The average executive salary is 100 times more than the average worker’s—and widening—according to ACTU figures. We’re told that bank CEOs’ loot-bags are bulging with the run-off from excess rate rises and capricious ATM fees.

Look, I'm just like you, only I earn 50 times your salary! Picture: Undercover Boss

But like so many social issues, the real battleground may be taking place outside of the political and news-based arena. It’s the mainstream popular media where opinions can be shaped and slippery messages fed to the young and the passive.

Ten’s “Undercover Boss Australia”—recently renewed for a second season—is a prime example of cynical corporate interests being delivered as “entertainment”. And yet it gets a free pass in the cultural debate over workers’ conditions, pay rates and CEO salary obscenity. In an environment where popular media isn’t considered to be worth serious discussion, we’re just expected to lap it up, not to talk about it.

This is why it’s still immensely important that media—of the most mainstream and mindless variety—can’t be allowed to be left unquestioned and unexamined by those who consume it, whether it’s kids in school or society at large.

“Undercover Boss Australia”‘s “heartwarming reality” shows CEOs of large corporations don store uniforms and go slumming undercover among their lowliest workers. Oh, what laughs they share and tears they shed. And then, when all is revealed, these loyal minions are rewarded with gifts showered from above and the warm glow of corporate appreciation.

As they receive their final moments of glory, their smiling faces shoved not only into extreme close-up but slow-motion as well, subtitles inform us of the wonderful future that awaits them as loyal workers of the corporate machine (for one particularly “endearing” worker on the US version, we were proudly informed that he “continues to live the American Dream”).

As well as simple propaganda, it’s also drawing on a deeper resonance, which is disturbing in its religious and monarchistic foundations: that of the god or king walking among men, testing their virtue, and meting out reward and punishment.

Myth and literature are full of examples, from “The Odyssey” to “Lord of the Rings”. In Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”, gods Zeus and Hermes put on some hobo-chic clothes and go looking for a place to sleep. Nobody lets them in except for Baucis and Philemon, who are then treated like real super-nice for the rest of eternity (meanwhile, everyone else gets killed horribly, or whatever).

It’s something of a poetic panopticon: at any moment you might be “entertaining angels unawares”. That may not seem like such a bad thing—treating everyone as though they were the most important person around could make for a pretty nice worldview—but I’m reminded somewhat of Kurt Vonnegut’s summary of the Bible’s crucifixion story: far from being a message of “whatever you do to the least among you, you do to me”, Vonnegut saw it as a message of: “Before you kill somebody, make absolutely sure he isn’t well connected”.

It’s also problematic when it establishes and normalises a natural hierarchy of lesser beings and the really important people who walk among them. Rewards and punishments flow solely from the perspective of the boardrooms, and the real focus, even in those demeaning rewards ceremonies, is on the boss’ display of generosity and glorious return to god-like form.

Whatever the bosses learn is quickly spun into corporate narrative: disruptive elements, we’re told, come in the form of misguided local managers or ungrateful employees. There’s always someone to take the fall for the boardroom. In one US episode, the CEO of degrading T&A franchise “Hooters” was apparently stunned that women were being treated less-than-respectfully by one franchise manager; the manager was offered up as a scapegoat, allowing “Hooters” to maintain its nonsense rhetoric of being all-inclusive and family-friendly.

While bosses walking as gods among mortals carry enormous power-reserves, the employees have a lot to lose with a camera sticking in their faces. Meanwhile, the bosses have a lot to gain by establishing their organisations as caring, nurturing and important elements of social stability.

Nothing in the show seriously deals with workplace issues or the roles of the minimum-wage workers that keep many of these organisations afloat. I wonder how many corporate workers will feel that this adequately represents their experiences: I wonder how many will have this kind of platform to safely voice their opinions at all. The “day in the life” approach misses the point that most workers aren’t there just for a day-in-their-lives.

We’re often told that the new generation of “kids” is selfish, lacks loyalty, and expects special treatment. That probably just shows that they’ve been paying attention to the way business runs. The savvy ones will realise that the loyalty and honesty they’re willing to show won’t necessarily get them anywhere, and it’s odd to see a generation criticised for lacking loyalty with casual employment perpetually on the increase.

So much for the fantasy of telling the boss to “take this job and shove it” (in the words of the David Allen Coe song). “Undercover Boss Australia” asks us to fantasise about receiving crumbs from the table.

If nothing else, all of this is a perfect reason why we need a culture of serious media analysis and education in schools and broader society.

All we end up with on a show like “Undercover Boss” is corporate advertising disguised as entertainment, and a cultural normalisation of short-term high-speed nepotism.

27 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jeremy says:

      07:39am | 29/11/10

      Damn right. Well said.

    • Jim says:

      08:23am | 29/11/10

      So someone with a nigh-on useless English Lit degree and an opinion is banging on about the evils of corporate bosses and is upset that a show dares portray a CEO as anything but a cross between an ogre and Scrooge McDuck. Just because someone named ‘Kit’ thinks it, doesn’t mean it is so.

    • Macca says:

      09:17am | 29/11/10

      @Jim, just what I was thinking. What extensive corporate experience does the author actually have.

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      02:06pm | 29/11/10

      c’mon fellas… corporate greed is bread and butter to soft-leftist types. It is evil to work hard, study, take chances and… this is the really evil part… “succeed”!
      How dare these CEOs pay themselves (err, they don’t set their pay anyways) so much when people out there are poor! Their wealth should be “redistributed” to more deserving types who, for whatever reason, are less “well off”, and so, are noble in their poorness [sic]. Let’s ignore the fact that it’s these people (and people on not so great packages) that subsidise the rest of society, with the rediculously high tax rates in this country.

      Me, I’m sick to death of corporate bashing, if boards of very succesful companies want to attract high performers by paying them lost of cash and incentives, fine by me.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      03:35pm | 29/11/10

      Brad,

      Every find it weird how the right and the left both use the exact same insults about intellectual and working laziness on each other?

      I wonder if it could be there are driven and lazy peeps on both sides-actually I don’t wonder, I know

    • Brad of Bentleigh says:

      12:30am | 30/11/10

      No, mate… I don’t find it weird at all smile

    • TChong says:

      08:41am | 29/11/10

      Corporate propaganda at its worst.
      All the bosses with no idea ( hey ! its not their fault ! they are stuck in the HQ, selflessly making wages for the ungrateful employees,) are all really super concerned about everyones well being, and gosh ,oh gee, would hate to know if not treated fairly.
      So , the pathetic ruse, CEO has the tiniest taste of humble pie, then reveals themselves as the White Knight.
      Should appeal to many of our loyal corporate citizens, who know their bosses are always right - the same toadies who support the LNPs workchoices.

    • Jim says:

      09:09am | 29/11/10

      It’s all or nothing with people like you TChong…you either partake in the Utopian Pipe-Dream where the bludgers get exactly the same benefits as the ones who try and get ahead, or you’re branded a ‘loyal corporate citizen’. Nothing’s ever in between is it?
      I’ve worked for some great bosses who, funnily enough, were more often right than wrong…guess it comes down to being intelligent and adept enough to climb to the top, hey.
      I’ve worked for some absolute dogs as well, their climb was based on bullying and intimidation, with a sprinkle of lies thrown in for good measure.
      As for Workchoices, it was only a massive scare campaign full of half-truths that brain washed a section of the population who couldn’t be bothered thinking for themselves. By and large it was loved by small business and (believe it or not) by employees who had a go.

    • TChong says:

      10:22am | 29/11/10

      But Jim, if so many people loved WorkChoices, why was Howard so definitely removed, AND why has Abbott said its no longer policy. ?
      As you concede dogs of managers exist, under Howards WorkCoices these same dogs would have had unchallengable final say over someone like you. Thats fair? How?
      We all like to think we are right, but in this case Jim, the overwhelming majority dont agree with you.
      Thems the breaks in a democracy.

    • jf says:

      12:57pm | 29/11/10

      The other “breaks” in a democracy are opportunity and freedom (including freedom of choice).

      All those employees with “dogs of managers” have the absolute freedom to seek employment elsewhere. And the stronger the economy the greater the ability of the employee to do exactly that.

      Alternatively, that same employee can go and do exactly what their employer has done. Put everything at risk, work massive hours for very little return, sacrifice their own leisure and build a strong successful business.

      Should that person be you TChong, you then have the freedom to lavish benefits and benevolence on your employees, to distribute equally the fruits of your labour and to continue to provide work and dignity to all Australians.

      However, until you do, you can sit back and carp about the very people that provide you with the means to do so, not to mention a quality of life that is (and personal freedoms) the envy of those economies that you would love to see ours become. That is your right.

    • Amy Sturt says:

      08:49am | 29/11/10

      “Nothing in the show seriously deals with workplace issues or the roles of the minimum-wage workers that keep many of these organisations afloat.”  Strange thing to say, since that’s the entire premise of the show -  that those on the ground are those with the best understanding of the way the company is run, how decisions of the executive shape their work environment and, above all, giving great respect to the knowledge and work ethic of the staff.

      Undercover Boss works with the same concept that has been present in business savvy corporations for years, particularly in the manufacturing sector.  In many corporations, including those in Australia, the executive is required to spend a prescribed period of time every week on the factory floor or out in the field, observing conditions and communicating with staff.  This ensures an understanding between both parties in the roles they collectively play, allows for changes to the workplace environment for the benefit of the staff and effective communication between different branches of the same company.

      For example, a well recognised Australian garbage collection company began a similar program to what I described above, asking the executive to spend an hour a week in a different branch of the company.  They picked up things they would never have noticed otherwise, that the garbage collectors deal with every day.  Things like, the company representative salesmen were selling the wrong type of bin contract for a popular chicken restaurant and the bins as a consequence were becoming impossible to clean (it should have half the size, picked up twice weekly, not twice the size, once a week), or the inefficient scheduling of routes and pickups.  In both situations, the executive can address this issue by communicating with another branch of the business and both issues directly result in a more efficiently run business with happier staff. 

      Sure, Undercover Boss has the thrilling make over at the beginning of the show, to allow for the big reveal at the end - but the idea of executives seeking to understand the various roles played by their employees and the importance of those roles has been around for a very long time, just like employing from within the company and funding in-company management programs.  And in every situation, the company benefits from the knowledge of the ground floor.

    • bella starkey says:

      12:01pm | 29/11/10

      Do you work for channel ten or something?

    • Kate Southam says:

      10:01am | 29/11/10

      Enjoyed your piece Kit. I have caught the show a few times and the moral of the story appears to be that the guy - sometimes woman - at the top is out of touch with their workers and customers.

      I do agree with your comments about the end of the show where the under paid overworked employees is handed a few crumbs. The whole thing is cringe worthy.

    • David C says:

      10:09am | 29/11/10

      news flash, Greens no result in Vic election and Labor probably shunted. The politics of envy (as opposed to aspiration ) is on the way out.

    • JoC says:

      10:11am | 29/11/10

      great analysis!

    • Mr GG says:

      11:55am | 29/11/10

      I think you missed the biggest point is that they don’t deserve those pay checks in any way. One of the CEOs was going to get fired from a minimum wage pizza making job. If the Man doesn’t posses the minimal Mental and Physical capacity to keep the lowest job in the corporation, how can it possibly be warranted to pay him anything? or suggested that he has skill to be a CEO? if you cant make a Pizza you are not in the top tier of humanity that deserves to be making decisions, high school drop outs with Physical handicaps can do the job that he was incapable of doing.

      I’m sick hearing big business saying ‘let them eat cake’ .
      VIVA LA REVOLUTION

    • David C says:

      12:27pm | 29/11/10

      Love the logic, one CEO cant make a pizza therefore CEOs dont deserve those pay checks .......in any way

    • marley says:

      01:20pm | 29/11/10

      Golly gosh.  Does this mean if I can’t hammer a nail straight I can’t be an architect?  Or does it just mean I shouldn’t be a carpenter?  Do you seriously believe the chairman of an airline should be able to fix an aircraft engine, or the head of a shipping company should be good at swabbing decks?

      Making pizzas requires a different set of skills from running a large corporation, dealing with suppliers, franchisees and staff, juggling budgets, picking up on innovations, expanding markets, attracting customers.  If the CEO can manage all of the latter, and keep the business profitable and employing pizza makers, what the heck does it matter if he can’t do a decent pizza himself?

    • Christine says:

      12:35pm | 29/11/10

      If people were paid proper living wages, bosses wouldn’t have to add ‘descending angel of bounty’ to their job descriptions. After all, they’re only getting 80 times what their employees are earning ~ squeezing another duty onto the resume is a tough call.

    • Jim says:

      01:08pm | 29/11/10

      Christine, you’d have to be a fool twice over to say we don’t have it good in this country. Our baseline Centrelink payments are higher than most countries average wages. No one that works should be struggling; it sickens me to see people complaining about not getting enough yet still have enough to buy ciggies and play the pokies.
      And so what if CEO’s get 80 times what the employees get? They are there to improve the companies bottom line and profitability and to be a face for the shareholders…they’re not there to flip burgers.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      03:56pm | 29/11/10

      @Jim - So they’re not there to actually do anything that makes the company money? Like flipping burgers for example.

    • marley says:

      06:58pm | 29/11/10

      @Christine - flipping burgers is good.  Negotiating for the best deal with suppliers, developing new markets, buying new technology, running advertising campaigns to get the customers in the door, negotiating with banks to finance and expand the business, these too are rather useful skills.  If you think that flipping burgers is all there is to owning and running a fast food place, never mind a chain, well, all I can suggest is that you try it some time and see how you go.

    • jf says:

      01:00pm | 29/11/10

      So says a man that spent at least three years completing a PhD and, by definition, focussing on a very narrow topic in great detail and yet “still isn’t sure what (it) was about”.

    • Cameron says:

      01:12pm | 29/11/10

      Wages are nothing more than an outcome of supply and demand.  The person qualified for the CEO position is in relatively short supply while a pizza maker is not.  We are paid the amount that is required to keep us working, not an amount that reflects the work performed.

      Highly paid CEO’s are an outcome of globalisation - like it or not, running a global company (or even national) is very complex and not everyone is qualified.

      That’s not to say Executives are overpaid - they certainly are - but the driver of their wages is the community’s ever growing desire for economic growth.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      02:42pm | 29/11/10

      Personally I’ve given up on the mainstream media - not because I’m some elitist but the pursuit of the lowest common denominator took tv too low for even an average Joe.

      I think the battle to make mainstream tv respectable (or even decent) has already been lost. Better off focussing on exposing it than trying to regulate it.

    • Drew says:

      08:55am | 30/11/10

      Good analysis, although the bible crucifixion bit doesn’t fit with your thesis. That particular “god among mortals” did not keep his status a secret, was crucified by the mortals for being so candid, and forgave his executioners anyway. In that corporation, even killing somebody as well connected as the CEO wouldn’t harm your career prospects, as long as you repent.

    • Claire says:

      12:45pm | 16/02/11

      Marketing at its best. People will be more likely to buy or use a product or service if they think the CEO is a nice, fluffy, caring bunny. Not to mention the huge amount of product placement present during each episode. Smart advertising, and the average viewer is none the wiser

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @BenFordham: Kevin Rudd says his colleagues see him as the "best prospect" to save the ALP.

Anthony Sharwood

Meanwhile, in the real world, hard-working Australians pack the kids' lunches and bundle them off to school #Ruddvenge#Auspol

Daniel Piotrowski

And @_Tors on Labor's scorched earth shenanigans http://t.co/E9I69dG5

Daniel Piotrowski

Malcolm Farr on what a Rudd administration would look like http://t.co/MSwM7ZWR

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Live blog: Gillard’s press conference

Live blog: Gillard’s press conference

Julia Gillard will give a press conference at 9.30am Eastern Time to respond to Kevin Rudd’s shock…

A sneak preview of PM Kevin Rudd Mark II

A sneak preview of PM Kevin Rudd Mark II

After modest carousing following his second elevation to Prime Minister - no more than half an hour -…

Scorched earth is all that will remain if they keep this up

Scorched earth is all that will remain if they keep this up

Never underestimate the furiously protective streak of an adult daughter towards her father. Last night…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Australia, we’re a bunch of heartless travel snobs

Justin says:

My 2 cents worth, If you feel the need to belittle other peoples holidays/methods of travel/experiences/destinations/restaurants they choose etc etc, then you should probably take a look at yourself in the mirror as well. People should be free to travel as they can best afford, best suits… [read more]

From: This Sally’s no lay down, she’s a lay down misère

Jacques Meoff says:

"Why can't we have more athletes like Sally Pearson?" The answer is actually pretty simple, notwithstanding the simple fact that she is an incredible athlete, the AIS pour 99 percent of their money into supporting the swimmers. Unless you form part of that team you fund yourself to train, travel and… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

160 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter