Life’s about film stars and less about mothers. It’s all about fast cars and cussing each other. But it doesn’t matter cause I’m packing plastic, and that’s what makes my life so f***ing fantastic.

And I am a weapon of massive consumption and it’s not my fault, it’s how I’m programmed to function. I’ll look at the sun and I’ll look in the mirror I’m on the right track, yeah I’m on to a winner. - Lily Allen.

The body image issues that plague so many women in our society are very real and are, in their essence, rooted in fear.

Let’s be clear – this is an insidious problem that saps the confidence, creativity and energy of so many women in our society – no matter what age, but alarmingly at an earlier and earlier stage.

Lily Allen’s hugely successful hit song “The Fear” is a seminal look at how success is determined in modern society, the aspirations of many young people - and the confusion, isolation and fear these modern challenges bring.

It contains lines such as “I want to be rich and I want lots of money, I don’t care about clever, I don’t care about funny”, and “I’ll take my clothes off and it will be shameless, cos everyone knows that is how you get famous”. And the killer “Now I’m not a saint and I’m not a sinner, but everything’s cool as long as I’m getting thinner”.

I don’t know whether Ms Allen meant the song as a parody – she is a young woman who herself has had some highly publicised problems with drinking and behaviour – but all good satire is anchored in truth.

The chorus of “The Fear” is perhaps the most telling of all: “I don’t know what’s right and what’s real anymore. I don’t know what I’m meant to feel anymore.  When do you think it will all become clear? Cos I’m being taken over by the fear.”

It’s a song that was hugely popular and many women – including lots of teens and tweens - would know the words by heart. I wonder how many personally relate to them?

The pressure on women to be beautiful, to be consumers, to be thin, and even to be “famous” – which the popular phenomenon of reality TV has now put in the grasp of just about anybody – is enormous and seemingly growing by the minute.

In examining the reasons for this, I think again Ms Allen provides a clue:  the first line in the excerpt at the head of this article is quite telling “Life’s about film stars and less about mothers”.

The de-valuing of motherhood has contributed significantly to a loss of matriarchal power in our society.  The cult of beauty and youth has become so significant that many older women feel virtually “invisible” in the modern world.

Motherhood is, by it’s very biological nature, an important bridge for many females from youth to adulthood. It’s a tangible “rite of passage” on the road to maturity.

While the world of celebrity has been inundated with babies in recent times, the concepts of motherhood we get from most magazines and the celebrities featured in them are often centred, sadly, around headlines like “How I got my body back”… which only re-enforces the idea that having children is a debilitating process from which you have to be re-claimed.

Or perhaps even more destructively, the stories of the celebrity “super Mum” who not only got her body back, but starred in a movie, visited starving children in Africa, jetted around the world for media interviews and still found time to look gorgeous for the photoshoot in her spotless Bahamas home.

Who could not feel inadequate comparing themselves to that?  Of course, there’s a lot in that list that relates to being a “celebrity”, rather than a “mum”.  Motherhood is always an addendum to celebrity, an ‘added extra’ as it were.

Sure, we like to talk about celebrity Mums, but there is still precious little in the mainstream media about the real joys and challenges of parenthood. (sans nanny, cook and housemaid) You can find a lot more information on “how to drop a dress size in 2 weeks”, “the latest fashion must-haves”, or “hot tips to make you better in bed”.

(All designed, as feminists would argue, to enhance our appeal to men) The thing is, while we all love our Mums, motherhood is not valued as a personal attribute nor a contribution to society in itself.

Women are not valued for this role - certainly nowhere near as highly as they are for their beauty or celebrity. This I believe has seriously eroded the role of older women in our society.

Instead of being valued for their enormous contribution to society in nurturing and raising the next generation, their wisdom and their generosity, or their achievements in the workplace, older women in our society are often judged on “how good they look for their age”.

I have deep concerns about the sexualisation of young girls and the body image issues with which many teenagers struggle.  But the fact is, a lot of older women struggle with these issues too – and they do so in the context of feeling like they are literally ‘persona non gratia’ because they’ve passed a certain age.

There is no silver bullet on this issue.

One thing we do need to do is put motherhood (and parenthood for that matter) on the pedestal that is currently reserved for beauty and youth.  We have to send the message to young women that their achievements (both personal and career) are more important and significant than how they rate on the beauty scale. Or the actual scale for that matter.

We have to start talking more about what really matters in this life – and start defining success and happiness by factors other than image and celebrity. Certainly, educational and career achievements are important. But so too is the achievement of mothering.

Many women who have had profound success in the workplace (and even those famous celebrities) acknowledge that the most important job they will ever do is to raise happy children.  It’s also the most fulfilling.

But our young women are definitely getting the opposite message: “Life’s about film stars and less about mothers”.

Most commented

26 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Liz says:

      06:59am | 30/10/09

      Lot of assumptions here,some of them dangerous.Why does Parenthood need to be put on a pedestal, isn’t that feeding into the exact thing you’re criticising?
      What we need is more good role models,more good parents whose concerns are raising happy,well adjusted kids.
      So motherhood is a rite of passage from youth to adulthood is it? Maybe that’s part of the problem that youthfulness=inexperience, having babies is seen as a badge and as conferring knowledge and skill which in some cases it definitely does not.Witness various recent cases and the growing prevalence of young mothers with a houseful of used nappies and no clue or care about how to be organised.
      Better support is also needed and and end point for rehabilitation when kids are given a realistic chance of a good life.
      Celebrities whatever they may say rarely provide a stable, settled real world existence for kids.Money doesn’t do it.

    • Jolanda says:

      07:38am | 30/10/09

      I think that the devaluing of mothers goes much further than just the desire of some mothers to be labeled a ‘yummy mummy’. 

      I often see, and recently there were articles about this in the DT in relation to mothers at pre-school, people criticizing mothers who are confident, who succeed and are good at their role and who have childen who develop milestones early. 

      http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/suedunlevy/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/how_to_turn_the_tables_on_playgroups_alpha_mums/

      It seems that if a parent has a child and she is coping well and if the child is developing at a fast speed and if a parent shares this she is critisized and called names and presented as though she is somehow showing off and insulting others.

      Yet if a mother cannot cope, has a baby who cannot settle or has a child who is not responding well to discipline and is developing somewhat slower than expected the mother is presented as being a hero and she can talk about it all she wants nobody calls her anything negative even if, maybe, the problems stem from her parenting?

      It seems that the less successful you are at your role of being a mother and the more delayed or badly behaved your child is the more respected you are as a mother.  Go figure!  Of course I am talking perfectly healthy kids here not kids with disabilities or disorders as that is a completely different story.

      Education – Keeping them Honest
      http://jolandachallita.typepad.com/education/
      Our children deserve better

    • Eric says:

      07:51am | 30/10/09

      The invisible parents are the ones left out of this article—and yesterday’s article about “what mothers think”.

    • Matt says:

      08:19am | 30/10/09

      Why do lame politicians want to co-opt perfectly good popular culture. I love that song, now every time I listen to it I’ll hear the sad bleating of a Victorian Tory. Thanks a lot, Sophie.

    • bob says:

      08:20am | 30/10/09

      wow what a brilliant lyricist lily allen is, not.

      throw away lines just to make a rhyme, mixed with vague rhetoric… so deep.

    • bella starkey says:

      08:39am | 30/10/09

      I think the real question, matt, is; why would we elect a polly so daft they dont understand quite obvious satire?

    • Julia says:

      09:12am | 30/10/09

      Unfortunately, Sophie, some mothers don’t enjoy motherhood. I wonder if there is more out there indicating this is a great job, great life and great lifestyle, more women would just feel cheated that they don’t have a hearts and flowers experience of the ‘hood.

      Personally I love being a stay-at-home mother. But I have a terrific husband who still contributes to housework and understands that while raising a baby has some fun moments, it’s still heaving lifting and nursing.

    • Bec says:

      09:37am | 30/10/09

      In my experience, so many mothers look down on me because I’m NOT a mother. I’m told that I will never have as rich a life because I won’t have my own children. That is just as hurtful. I think what the article should be focusing on is trying to get women to support each other no matter WHAT their lifestyle choice is.

    • a says:

      09:45am | 30/10/09

      Why should people not be fit and healthy, merely because they are having a baby or are about to have a baby?  It is not the human tradition to carry bodyfat.  For 10000 years man has been without surplus food, now we have surplus food we are fat.  I think reducing consumption and increasing exercise will benefit in society.  Not popular policy though is it? Smokers are a burden to society, but I’m sure the obese are a larger problem both physically and fiscally, shame we don’t see more ads and activities helping people to lose weight.

    • kw says:

      09:51am | 30/10/09

      amen to that Bec!
      Sadly I’ve known some mums who look down upon colleagues without children, suggesting they are automatically leading a selfish lifestyle etc.
      Balance and respect each way is key.

    • kym durance says:

      11:39am | 30/10/09

      I dont think we will get any where putting parent hood on a pedestal

      - we just need to discourage the vapid fawning offered to others with an over valued skill set - like the capacity to sing, or play dress ups in a movie - or even kick a ball - all very clever - but all over valued -

      I am a great believer in the tall poppy syndrome - which
      at the end of the day believe is more like judicious pruning -

      If we valued people for what they are really worth mothers might get alook in

    • Proud Dad says:

      12:26pm | 30/10/09

      Number one question, why does it all fall on the mother?  Dad has a part to play in all of this as well.

      I’ve got two great little girls, an 8 y/o and a 16 m/o, the 8 y/o has a twin brother as well.  Both my wife and I encourage the 8 y/o’s to be themselves, and only gently push them in directions that they are good at.  We always provide the encouragement and support that they need to get through life and deal with whatever issues and criticism they may come across.

    • Paul says:

      12:38pm | 30/10/09

      Matt, I’m surprised and dismayed by your view of “perfectly good culture.” Surely, you haven’t had your head that far in the sand over the past football season (in all codes and at most levels) to know that modern culture is not perfectly good. The culture, especially around football clubs, appears to be to achieve two things: to get drunk as often as possible and to have sexual liasons as often as possible. Of course, women are caught up in this trash (usually the victims) and Sophie makes a very good point about the things we value and put on a pedestal and how this affects the choices and lifestyles that young women adopt. As for the view that she’s a lame politician and Victorian Tory, I’d suggest you save the lame personal insults for your own private space rather than a public forum.

    • Grant says:

      02:06pm | 30/10/09

      Whenever I read or hear any material relating to womens issues written or spoken by women.  It is seems to be from the stand point of a being a victim of society or circumstances beyond womens control.

      However factually and statistically men are more disadvantaged.

      Lets see:

      1. Victim of crimes rate is higher for men.  Homicide is around 65% for males: for example 64% percent of homicide victims in 2007 were male and 58% percent of recorded assault victims in 2007 were male.  These are average trends over time and are most types of crimes.

      2.  Men’s suicide rate is around 5 times higher than women’s.  1657 males committed suicide in 2005.

      3. The vast majority of work-related deaths are of males - 541 males per annum 90.5% of working and commuting deaths as against 57 females/

      4.  More women than men attend universities in Australia and finish secondary and university level education.

      4.  Stastically men have higher rates of mental health issues.

      5.  The Cancer Council Australia reports the highest number of cancer cases after skin cancer in Australia is colorectal or bowel cancer in men , which also causes the most deaths (and the most premature deaths) in Australia from cancer.

      Funding for national screening programs for cervical cancer far exceeds funding and health service programs for bowel cancer.  However cervical cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer deaths in females.

      6.  Life expectancy of men in Austrlaia is 78.5 years men and 83.3 years women.

      7.  Women prisoners represent less than 7 per cent of the total Australian prison population.

    • cats says:

      02:21pm | 08/12/09

      OH my freaking god. This article is about the pressure on women to look good constantly, and how it effects our self esteem. Wtf is wrong with people like you, bringing men’s issues into EVERYTHING that is written about women on this blog. Why don’t you write your own article about men’s disadvantage and post it somewhere? FFS!

    • HP says:

      02:17pm | 30/10/09

      Please do your research - Lily Allen is absolutely having a go at the Paris Hilton type crowd with this song. I think this is a great song to show teenagers how shallow and unfulfilling that lifestyle as a goal is. In fact I think they should study this song in high schools and explore the themes she is parodying - much more relevant than some the assignments I see them doing at the moment.

    • Eric says:

      02:32pm | 30/10/09

      Well said indeed, Grant.

      We have to keep bringing these facts into the discussion, as currently they are ignored by the biased media.

    • Karl says:

      02:56pm | 30/10/09

      Interesting Grant..
      Maybe just as well if men make up more numbers in victims of crime, if we actually commit many, many, many more crimes than women….93% of the prison population??!?! yikes!!!
      And despite making up less of the uinversity attendees, and graduates, still hold MANY more management & senior positions in Australia?? Hmmmm. That doesn’t seem fair, on that we can agree!! 
      I think you’ve just lent more weight to the female issues raised on this site!!!

    • bec says:

      04:27pm | 30/10/09

      1. Men commit violent crimes at higher rates than women.

      2. The rates of female suicide in developing countries (i.e. 70% of the world’s population) far exceed the rates of male suicide.

      3. Men choose to work in dangerous professions. They are more than welcome to get administrative, nursing, or teaching jobs.

      4. Statistically and culturally, men are less likely to seek help for mental and physical health issues. If they took responsibility for their own health and got over stupid cultural hangups about manliness, they wouldn’t be getting ill at the rates they do.

      5. If men want more funding for biological-sex specific cancers, they should start campaigning for it themselves in the same way that women did for breast and cervical cancer. Movember and other initiatives are great starts.

      6. Maybe if a large number of men stopped participating in risky activities and behaviours there would be a change in these rates?

      7. As mentioned above, women commit fewer offenses.

    • BB says:

      08:16pm | 31/10/09

      Grant, all you’ve proved is that you’ve read ‘manhood’ and swallowed Steve Biddulph’s tedious statistics whole heartedly. Ever heard the saying ‘You can prove anything with statistics’?

      News flash: gender studies is not about winning the ‘most opressed’ badge of honour.

    • Grant says:

      12:40pm | 02/11/09

      What I am trying to say is that mens issues are under represented even though statistically we have highest number of issues on crime, physical health, mental health, education, life expectancy.  I would just like more attention to be brought to these areas, as they obviously need attention.

      @ Karl
      I don’t believe I’m lending weight to a side, I don’t believe that there are sides in this debate.  However I do agree with you in men commit more crimes, so we have identified an issue here that needs more attention to be looked at with proactive government policies to help address it.

      @ bec
      1. Yes exactly its something that culturally, socially and government that we need to look at more closely.
      2. That’s unfortunate but I’m only referring to Australia.
      3. So because it’s more dangerous, then they don’t deserve to work in safe working environments?  I don’t understand your response.
      4. Obviously there are reasons why men don’t seek to get help on health and mental health issues.  Shouldn’t we as a community try to address this by understanding why they don’t see help and try and communicate the message to young men that they should?
      5. I was referring to public government initiatives and spending.

      @ BB says:
      I have never heard of Steve Biddulph, however nice of you to put me in the same category as him.

      The Stastistics I got were from the Australian Bereau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Crimonology, they are both Government bodies and are widely recognised as providing accurate information.

      The statement that stastics can be used for anything doesn’t hold water here, would you prefer I used no statistics in my argument, that makes no sense.

    • BB says:

      05:07pm | 02/11/09

      Grant, regardless of whether you’ve heard of Steve Biddulph, or the statistics are accurate, they are still tedious. I don’t necessarily prefer you don’t use statistics in your arguement. I do prefer that statistics are relevant. 

      Does a tendency towards violence conclusively indicate that men are disadvantaged? Does less funding to male-related cancers indicate they are conidered less important? Possibly the required testing/screening/treatment for these diseases costs less.

      I’ll say it again, this is not about winning the title of ‘most opressed’.

    • Lisa says:

      08:56pm | 05/11/09

      I think the special contempt which so many teenage girls hold for their mums encapsulates society’s general attitude perfectly: you may cook for me, clean for me and pay my bills (although generally I’ll chalk your money as belonging to Dad)...but in doing these things, you are in fact announcing yourself as a brainless maid, with fewer worthwhile opinions than others.  You are old, and therefore, less ‘powerful’ than me, as you hold less sexual promise. Which is the power of a woman. So outta my way!

    • Harris Munchausen says:

      01:31pm | 08/12/09

      Sophie Mirabella, your writing is unbelievably boring. Please go.

    • cats says:

      02:35pm | 08/12/09

      Grant, your list of reasons why men are more disadvantaged just got owned. I agree with BB, male vs female needs to end, and the point of living is not to prove that you are more disadvantaged than the opposite sex. I know that Eric would disagree with me there. But you can’t do anything but feel sorry for a 40 year old unemployed virgin who lives for any chance he can get to bring women back down to where we have been for the past.. oh, maybe 1000 years or more

    • Harris Munchausen says:

      07:42pm | 08/12/09

      I have been told on very good authority that Sophie Mirabella was cloned from the severed hand of Mortimer Jones.
      As many of you will remember, Mortimer Jones was the genocidal creationist who spent 3 years and 5 million American dollars building what he claimed was “a spaceship to God”.
      It was, of course, no spaceship at all, but simply an elephantine statue of a pig.
      Made out of soap.

      As for her article, she clearly hasn’t inherited any of dear old Mortimer’s flair for the dramatic.
      Her prose reads about as smoothly as a bag of crushed nuts trying to crawl its way out of a drainpipe.
      Why won’t she just LEAVE?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ToryShepherd: Onya, @KRuddMP“@newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/CFaHrxyV5G

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/2KEO6yEx5F

Daniel Piotrowski

True Rudd style. Bazillion word folksy statement

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @Rob_Stott: Like a lot of Republicans in the US, it's much easier to support gay marriage when you're no longer in a position to do anyt…

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter