Last week we saw two new Labor tax ideas floated in the media. First, a “slug the rich tax” – if you earn $150 thousand a year, the Rudd lot consider you are rich so they think a surcharge of 3% on those earning $150 thousand would raise some billions of dollars.

Illustration: John Tiedemann

Secondly, a “lets slug everyone tax” with a capital gains tax on the family home. The family home is sacrosanct but not to Labor.

They first wanted to tax it as far back as 1980 when in opposition. In fact we did not have a capital gains tax till Paul Keating imposed it in 1986 (retrospective to September 1985).

Even then he didn’t attack the family home and left it Capital Gains Tax free, but he did give us the Fringe Benefits Tax, The Recession we had to have and 17%interest rates.

The usual pro tax on the family home arguments are advanced. The main one being that leaving it out distorts the tax.

Well it does. But to me that’s a good reason to abolish the Capital Gains Tax altogether and replace it with a speculative gains tax which would impose the tax at the taxpayers top margin rate if the asset is disposed of within one year of acquisition. The tax rate would then reduce for every year the asset is held and phase out altogether at say seven years.

The family home would remain exempt, but the distorting effect is much reduced as there is an incentive to spread investment because of the phase out of the tax after seven years.

Tax reform should be to assist individuals invest and create wealth and not to be an exercise to simply gathering in as much tax as the government can get its hands on.

Again and again the Treasurer has been given the opportunity to rule out imposing a capital gains tax on the family home and has refused to do so.

Treasurer Swan tries to tell us that the tax revue being carried out by the head of his department is independent. What rubbish! A departmental head answers to his minister and, in this case, Mr Henry answers to Mr Swan.

Treasurer Swan has already told Mr Henry to rule out consideration of the GST and the tax-free status of superannuation payments (from a tax paying rule out) to people over 60, so why not rule out tax on the family home.

The answer is that Labor will always wield the blunt tool of tax to the disadvantage of the individual. By taxing and pretending they can spend people’s money better than they can; they deny the individual the right to manage his or her own money in the belief that they can spend it better on the tax payers’ behalf.

So it is with the proposed Carbon Tax, but that’s for future debate.

If a week’s a long time in politics 3 months is an eternity.

If you listen to the Minister for Sport and Youth Affairs, Kate Ellis, you are supposed to believe that thousands of university students are going to beg Parliament to pass the government’s legislation to make them pay $250 each per year as a compulsory levy to provide services they don’t want.

Fair suck of the sauce bottle – even Rudd shouldn’t swallow this one.

Joke of the week.
Minister Albanese accusing someone in the Liberal Party of not being a sophisticate – he’d sure know one if he met one. Really!

Most commented

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Rationalist says:

      06:27am | 25/08/09

      Apart from rich taxes etc, the biggest tax Rudd is trying to introduce is the carbon tax and that is the most REGRESSIVE tax of the lot. I would even go so far as to say it is as regressive as alcohol and cigarette taxes.

      Why don’t we see some more unified outrage against the regressive tax against working families and those even worse off?

    • RT says:

      07:02am | 25/08/09

      This article raises two questions, Bronwyn. 1. do you think readers are stupid and cannot identify the difference between an idea floated in a government enquiry yet to become government policy, and a genuine government proposal contained in draft legislation? and 2. Why haven’t you announced your retirement from politics yet to help your party get on with the badly needed work of replacing the deadwood?

    • Nick says:

      07:40am | 25/08/09

      Bronwyn,

      Please note:‘till’ applies to the agricultural practice of preparing the soil for planting. It can also refer to a device for holding money in a shop. Surely you meant ‘til, the abbreviation of ‘until’.

      I would love a ticket to the Henry tax ‘revue’: all those bureaucrats singing and dancing their way through weighty economic submissions. I really think Mr Henry is conducting a ‘review’!

      Seriously, why would you expect the Treasurer to give a commitment of any kind on any of the myriad submissions and considerations under discussion as part of the review. The current Liberal tactic of taking every suggestion before the review and pretending it is already government policy is dishonest in the extreme.

    • Dude says:

      08:37am | 25/08/09

      Rightardation strikes again!

    • jonky says:

      08:58am | 25/08/09

      Pathetic! What is the point of sacrificing and working hard when it’s all going to be taxed away? Think I’ll sell up,quit my job and take my chances on welfare.

    • pc says:

      09:36am | 25/08/09

      Jonky I’d like to see you try that. Then like all the other lucky recipients of government aid you can live in the big rock candy mountains where they banned work, and the handouts grow on bushes and the cigarette trees and lemonade springs are next to the lake of stew, theres one of whiskey too in the big rock candy mountains. Unfortunately welfare and long term unemployment mean suicide, divorce, homelessness and many other really unattractive prospects. Dude rightardation strikes again. Why do so many conservatives feel it necessary to announce their opinion, when their opinion is exactly the same as every other rightard? Why do they never say anything new or even vaguely interesting?

    • Portia says:

      11:12am | 25/08/09

      Psst, Ms Bishop did you also hear that the first home owners grant should be limited to new homes only, that superannuation retirement benefits should be predominantly taken in income form not lump sums that are deliberately splurged and that, at long last, the unfairly manipulated tax advantages of family trusts will end.  Why are you not asking the Treasurer to either confirm or rule out these measures.  Oh wait.  Silly me, these are just examples from some of the submissions, not recommended by the Review, much less government policy.  And what is the Liberal policy about the baby bonus, I’m sure I saw an email that said no further baby bonus and a HECS type repayment system for baby bonuses already received.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:43am | 25/08/09

      I guess the rich might have to find new ways of tax avoidance. My suggestion for tax reform- tax capital flows going outside the country. Then I wouldn’t care if corporations engage in transfer pricing or the rich engage in off shore tax shelters. Very hefty penaltys for individuals, corporations and banks who fail to declare these capital flows to Austrac.

    • Razor says:

      12:30pm | 25/08/09

      When WA ALP proposed a CGT on house over a million dollars it got cannd pretty quickly.  it was an absolute vote killer - even in the rusted on ALP safe seats.  This was during a Federal election campaign and the WA ALP was guickly convinced to change their stance.

    • em says:

      12:40pm | 25/08/09

      So the family home is ‘sacrosanct’ is it.  Bull. The last few years has seen a never ending parade of wankers who prattle on about what a great ‘investment’ their HOME has turned out to be. If they want to treat it like an investment then tax it like one.  To PC-  I wanna go to that welfare nirvana you described! I’m always hearing about it and it’s priveliged inhabitants. I went to Centrelink yesterday to find out how I can get in on the lucrative benefits but funnily enough all I saw was depressed, stressed out and downright over the edge people (and I don’t mean the staff) standing in line trying to get some help to survive.  Some poor guys still in suits because they’ve been knocking on doors trying to get work, and have now come in to justify to the government why they’re ‘entitled’ to $200 PW.  So I saw lots of sadness and desperation but unfortunately no rock candy mountains or cigarette trees. By the way Ms Bishop I agree with you on one point- this ‘Rudd lot’ is bad, almost as uncaring and out of touch as ‘your lot’ were when you were in.

    • Citizen says:

      03:01pm | 25/08/09

      Poor Bronwyn. A wee bit short-sighted when it comes to the difference between ideas & policy or even draft policy. I see no new ideas coming from her Liberal Party, though in Bronwyn’s eyes it seems even a rumour can get new found gravitas not seen before. Plenty of those around at the moment. And did Bronwyn really find it necessary to remind everyone of 17% interest rates? Her point? Slightly in desperate need of a narrative? Just like her liberals.

    • pc says:

      04:09pm | 25/08/09

      I think there is a problem with their narrative, Citizen, so far the libs have been unable to produce anything coherent or resembling a plausible alternative to labor. To some extent I think Kev can thank the me tooism of the last campaign in pulling the rug out from under them but its also a reflection of Turnbull’s lack of any beliefs of his own. Except of course the belief that he should be the PM. And why is Bron still around? I’m reminded of a story that is attributed to Gareth Evans. “Most people dislike her instantly.” Why? “Because it saves time.”

    • Citizen says:

      09:49pm | 25/08/09

      Agreed pc, no plausible alternative or evidence of borrowing of P Garrett’s ‘midnight oil’ for an all-night policy bender that might produce something worth considering. And of the me-too-ism being bandied about, JWH perfected the similar ‘small target’ strategy in late ‘95 to frustrate Keating’s campaign. How karmic that 11.5 years on JWH was beaten at his own game. As for Master Turnbull, he appears to view most of the heavy lifting of being Opposition Leader as an inconvenience & obstruction to his ascendancy to that prize - Office of P.M. And I do like that story apparently from Gareth, which was presented to me in ‘why do….’ joke format. Timeless!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @CrawfordFund: @farrm51 u may like 2 help spread word of our #foodsecurity journo award http://t.co/FwbMWwJmLf

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter