The so-called supermarket milk price war is not the only thing heating up. The debate surrounding the future of brand name products on our supermarket shelves is also heating up.

In the near future, these will simply be called loops of fruit, not Froot Loops. And they'll probably have a pigeon on the packet instead of a toucan. And that will be sad. Pic: Geoff Ward

Central to both is the growing power of Coles and Woolworths. Together the supermarket giants operate 87 per cent of full line supermarkets over 2,000 square metres. As we know, they have spread their tentacles to petrol, liquor and banking services.

Like major armies on the march, Coles and Woolworths first establish a beachhead in a particular targeted sector of the economy and then spread out to take more and more territory in that sector until they are either stopped or they march their way to “victory.” Once victorious they can impose their “way” on those they deal with, including suppliers and even consumers.

Take home brand milk for example. First, Coles and Woolworths introduced home brand milk on a small scale. Then they priced the home brand milk a little lower than branded milk. This tactic was designed to initially get consumers used to a comparable product at a lower price. The lower price is aimed at drawing in the price conscious consumer who previously has been loyal to branded milk.

Consumers, believing that milk is all the same, began switching to home brand milk. As more and more consumers switch to the lower priced home brand milk, the future of branded milk starts to be doubtful. With branded milk looking increasingly shaky, the major supermarket chains, this time Coles, goes in for the killer punch by dropping prices on home brand milk with lots of publicity.

As even more consumers then move over to the home branded milk, the days of branded milk are numbered. Once branded milk drops off the supermarket shelf what do you think will happen to the price of Coles and Woolworths home brand milk? Yes, you guessed it, the price of home brand milk is likely to go up!

With the competition offered by branded milk undermined or destroyed by the price cuts on home brand milk, it’s clear that there is little or no incentive for Coles and Woolworths to keep down the price of home brand milk.

Of course, Coles and Woolworths will not stop at milk.

In fact, what’s happening with milk is happening across the Coles and Woolworths supermarket aisles where the march of home brand products is slowly but surely pushing branded products off the shelf to the detriment of suppliers and consumers.

For suppliers on the receiving end of Coles and Woolworths, they are simply not able to reinvest in product innovation or in the business if they are constantly been screwed down on wholesale prices they get from the supermarket giants.

Now this is where the suppliers are seen by some as evil, foreign-owned corporations that are gouging consumers on branded products. Coles, Woolworths and even the ACCC have pointed the finger at the “nasty price gouging” suppliers. Well, that’s all very interesting for a range of reasons.

For starters, Coles and Woolworths have an obvious self interest in blaming suppliers for the price of branded products. The only problem is that Coles and Woolworths will dictate the price at which suppliers sell to the chains. Coles and Woolworths tell the suppliers what to do, not the other way around. Coles and Woolworths control too much of the supermarket sector for any supplier to try and take them on.

Suppliers who do take on Coles and Woolworths are generously sent on a “holiday” by the giants who can simply take the suppliers’ product off the shelf and put more home brand products in its place.

As for the ACCC, it is a bit rich for it to suggest that the suppliers should be taking some of the blame for any price hikes for the simple reason that it was the ACCC that allowed the suppliers to merge or take out their competitors causing some wholesale sectors to become highly concentrated.

Therein lies the central problem facing Australian consumers. The fact is that the ACCC has allowed so many mergers and acquisitions to take place in recent years that we now have some of the most highly concentrated sectors in the world. The harsh reality is that with fewer players in a market following mergers and acquisitions, the remaining players act as a cosy club that drives up prices to the detriment of consumers.

The ultimate danger for consumers is that they will be left with less product choice and higher prices. At a Coles and Woolworths supermarket it’s clear that more and more shelf space is being taken over by home brand products. Branded products get pushed higher or lower on the shelf making it harder to see them or they may even fall off the shelf altogether.

Now, would you miss your favourite branded product if it fell off the shelf? Some may say who cares as they think that home branded products and branded products are really the “same” product. Well, are they? We may think they are, but they can taste different. Try tasting home brand milk and comparing it to branded milk. You tell me if they taste the same!

Yes, ultimately it does depend on the consumer’s taste and preference, but that doesn’t mean that the home brand product is the “same” as the branded product.  There will be differences in quality, product sizes and taste. Even Woolworths has publicly stated that home brand products and branded products are not “identical.”

In any event, the quality of a home brand product may today be “comparable” to that of a branded product, but who is to say that the quality of the home brand product will remain the same over time. Once the branded product disappears off the shelf, there won’t be anything with which to compare the home brand product.

More dangerously for consumers, once the branded product falls off the shelf, then what’s stopping Coles and Woolworths from not only raising the price of home brand products, but also cutting their quality?

As they say, be careful what you wish for. If you really don’t care about the future of branded products then you might end up paying the price when the quality of home brand products drops off and their prices keep going up.

120 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • K. Grant says:

      05:06am | 16/03/11

      I never shop at Coles or Woolworths.  I pay slightly more for my food in the hope that my grandchildren won’t grow up in a world ‘owned’ by Wesfarmers and Woolworths.  There’s only a slight chance of it working but one has to try.

    • Vaunted says:

      06:29am | 16/03/11

      With something like 80% of the grocery market between them, Coles and Woolies are surely living examples of what’s wrong with virtual monopolies. What we have is quite obviously a kind of unspoken collusion with manufacturers, farmers and customers being milked for all they are worth in the name of maximising profits for shareholders. We can only hope your prayers are working KG, because it’s hard to see what else will save us.

    • Dave Sag says:

      08:22am | 16/03/11

      Here here.  I am lucky enough to live 5 minutes walking distance from some of the best small retailers in Canberra.  Im on a first name basis with my butcher, the guy who sells me the refills of honey, dishwashing liquid, olive and sunflower oils.  They’d all got used to me wandering into the shop with a bag full of plastic containers and old bottles rather than putting things in yet ore plastic wrapping.

      For major fruit and veg purchases I am a mere 40 minute bike ride to one of the best farmers’ markets in the country. My wife and I cycle up there on Saturdays and stock up on delicious apples (with no stickers attached), as well as other seasonal fruits.  We get amazing spuds (many varieties - some better for roasting, some better for mashing etc) and other seasonal veggies.

      And guess what, not only is the food of much much better quality than anything you’d get at Coles or Woolies (maybe because it’s not picked under-ripe and ‘ripened’ in trucks, it’s not sprayed with bleach, coated in wax, stored in plastic and kept under lights), it’s also cheaper!  And the farmers get a much better slice of the action.

      The other upside involves waste.  A vast amount of the food people buy from Coles and Woolies is simply left to rot in the ‘crispers’ of people’s fridges.  Mostly this is because people are encouraged to impulse buy in supermarkets, or to simply buy much more than they need (hey I save 50 cents if I get three litres of milk instead of one).  In contrast, shopping from the farmers market, and carting food home on your bike, means you need to plan what you will eat for the week and you tend to buy what you need.  As a result our household wouldn’t fill a kerbside bin in two months.  Also because our food is not bought in shrink-wrapped containers and we don’t get plastic bags foisted on us with every purchase, we are not paying Coles to add to landfill.

      I still go to Coles (there is one down the road, you can tell by the litter surrounding it) for things like light-bulbs, batteries, cat-food (if the brand my cat is addicted to is on sale,) and other sundries.  Milk and so forth I tend to buy from the IGA over the road as, even though it might cost a little more, we don’t drink gallons of milk per day and the few cents difference is hardly noticeable.  And the IGA sells proper full-cream milk, not that skim-milk bullshit that tastes like milk-flavoured water.

      The upsides to this are:
      1) it’s healthier for my family and the food tastes better
      2) it supports local farmers and shops
      3) it’s cheaper
      4) it’s a more enjoyable way to shop (shopping is a social activity when done properly)
      5) it encourages you to plan what you eat - in the 5 years I have lived here in Canberra we’ve had take-away food only once.
      6) you generate vastly less food and packaging waste.

      Now sure, not everyone is lucky enough to live near such excellent shops or near(ish) to a farmer’s market; but many many Australians do.  If you live in Adelaide why would you shop at Coles when there is the Central Market? If you live in Sydney or Melbourne there are myriad such markets.  Alas, unlike here in Canberra many of these markets are only open once per month (what, honestly is the damn use of that?) rather than almost every week (there are some weekends the north-side market is not open, but there are at least 2 other markets here within easy bike ride of pretty much anywhere). 

      I urge readers to take a look at http://www.farmersmarkets.org.au/markets to see where and when your local farmers’ market is, and actively reject the economic and social vampirism of the Coles / Woolies duopoly.

    • TracyH says:

      08:38am | 16/03/11

      ...and Dave Sag doesn’t need to buy fuel…his car’s propelled by his own self smugness smile Sorry Dave…couldn’t resist! But you DO make good points! smile

    • Paulista says:

      09:39am | 16/03/11

      Yes yes, I hate the big ones too, but sometimes - like yesterday at 5.00am or any of the other sudden moments of lack around our house - there aren’t a lot of options when you need bread and milk and sundries for the kids lunches and other minor emergencies.  And let’s not talk in too lofty a tone about planning the week ahead and carrying back the right amount of portuguese blood oranges for a week’s marmalade in the jute fruit sack of my carbon-offsetting penny farthing; sometimes the chaos of one’s life overwhelms the purity of one’s principles.  Still, I go for the markets and the small retailers whenever I can. I just don’t tend to go on about it in blogs.  oh, wait…

    • julesdog says:

      10:11am | 16/03/11

      The saddest face of capitalism is smug shoppers, Dave. Most of us do the best we can within the constraints we have. Lucky the consumer with time, money, nearby markets, a bike, a green priority and lots of plastic bottles. I’ve just carted home 14 bags from the local IGA. I’m stuffed, but someone’s gotta do it! At least I’m returning the empty bags for recycling - sometime soon. For the moment they are stuffed with the other 300 in the boot of my car.

    • Spanish Girl says:

      10:48am | 16/03/11

      I hardly think Dave is being smug.  He’s proud of his choices and rightly so.  If we all followed his example, we’d be much better off.  Good on you Dave for living a high moral life.  These days it’s tough road to travel down but if things are quiet inside your own head, then you’ve won.

      I’m a vegan so don’t buy prepackaged foods from the large chains.  I have a farmers market just down the road (about 15 mins walk).  For personal care items (soap, shampoo, etc) I go to Mrs Flannery’s or other health food stores.  Sure it costs a little more, but I have no dependants so I can afford to pay a little extra.

      Still, if Frank Zumbo is right, it’ll be sad to see Froot Loops disappear.  I used to live on those things as a kid.

    • Reg says:

      11:38am | 16/03/11

      Warning: large smug cloud headed this way!

    • Sharon says:

      12:33pm | 16/03/11

      More often than not fresh food is tastier elsewhere too. I’ve made a list of branded milk from independent, family-owned and organic dairies. Some come in glass bottles, cream at the top and from Jersey cows. And surprisingly in the big smoke, you can get them close to you. The alt.milk directory is here http://bit.ly/h2xk06

    • Ranger McFriendly says:

      03:41pm | 16/03/11

      Do you know wha that smug cloud could do if it merges with Mel Gibsons acceptance speech?

    • pete says:

      06:20am | 16/03/11

      It’s sort of ironic that Wesfarmers is squeezing the farmer, but then again they are not squeeky clean.  Everytime a bunnings open up they drop prices squeezing small hardwares out, once that’s done the prices are’nt that hot anymore.

    • Sherekahn says:

      10:05am | 16/03/11

      The corner shop is not dead where I live.  Think of the cost of petrol and pollution.
      If you can, buy from an organic shop.  They are increasingly popular.
      Try their organic shampoo, your hair will shine and never be itchy again!
      I’m certainly happy to pay a farmer for organic milk etc.

    • George C says:

      11:18am | 16/03/11

      Wesfarmers have nothing to do with farming as such, and the use of the word farmers in their name is a disgrace to farmers names everywhere. They are just your average greedy, obnoxious and lying corporation. The fact they are held in iconic status here in the West gives them room to behave like pricks and shaft all and sundry. Coles and Bunnings are off our shopping lists forever

    • Michelle says:

      06:29pm | 02/04/12

      Bunnings is about to open up across the road from our small hardware. There is no doubt we will be closing down loosing our ’ life savings’. We have been able to support our family ‘honestly’ & that right is been taken away from us. Ironically our customers come in & say that we are cheaper than Bunnings & we stock loose items , so people can buy what they actually need.

    • someone says:

      06:43am | 16/03/11

      Supermarket “home brand” products in the UK are absolutely amazing.  They also offer many unique products as well as the parallel ones.

      And the branded products haven’t fallen off the shelves.

      It’s weird to see someone criticising more choice for consumers.

    • A Bob says:

      07:40am | 16/03/11

      The UK is not Australia. Do they have duopoly? Read the article again, it’s about the loss of choice.

      I avoid the big 2 if I can. When I do go a Woolies I’ve noticed how the choices have been diminishing. There is an almost Soviet feel to some stores. Grey, bland and whatever you want so long as it’s in a no-name package. Funny how 2 different economic systems can deliver a similar outcome.

    • HappyCynic says:

      08:10am | 16/03/11

      But there isn’t more choice in Australia.  I never buy homebrand unless there is absolutely no alternative because it has a perception (even if it isn’t true) that it is somehow inferior and as a result of that perception I’d much rather pay a few dollars more at the till for something I perceive to be better quality.  And lets face it what are people really saving each time they reach the till?  A few dollars?  10?  20?  Are those few dollars so important to people that they have to cling on to them for dear life?  When did we become such tight-arses?

    • Peter says:

      10:05am | 16/03/11

      In the UK, milk farmers are being screwed by the supermarkets and are forced to stop their operations everyday as they are no longer profitable and manufacturers are forced into more ‘factory milk’ operations that resemble nothing like a farm. But the main difference in the UK is you have 4 not 2 major supermarket chains that control about 80% of the market. Tesco, Asda, Sainsburys and Morrisons, not just the Coles and Woolies you have in Australia. If four major competeing chains in the UK can cause so much grief, imagine a future when we have just two!!

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      10:24am | 16/03/11

      They ARE removing real brands from the shelves. I’ve noticed quite a number of them gone. 
       
      The thing that really annoys me is fresh produce, though. Kids are growing up thinking that tomatoes are supposed to have little or no flavour and that apples are floury. 
       
      Any process that involves picking unripe fruit, spraying it with a chemical to stop it ripening whilst in cold storage and then spraying it again so it ripens when you want to put it on the shelves is intrinsically wrong.
       
      I do my fruit shopping in markets and have never regretted the time spent. On the odd occasion I am out of something or in a screaming hurry, I buy at Woolworths and curse them roundly.

    • JB says:

      10:49am | 16/03/11

      I long for the day Tesco comes to Australia. Their own Tesco brand products are amazing, affordable, and not just direct copies of existing branded items. They’d eat Coles and Woolies alive…

    • JB says:

      10:49am | 16/03/11

      I long for the day Tesco comes to Australia. Their own Tesco brand products are amazing, affordable, and not just direct copies of existing branded items. They’d eat Coles and Woolies alive…

    • papachango says:

      04:36pm | 16/03/11

      what JB Said.

      Tesco or France’s Carrefour inhabit a completely different product quality, customer satisfaction and price universe where they would have fried Coles with a side of toasted Woolworths for breakfast, if only the latter two didn’t taste so crap.

    • Wendy says:

      07:15am | 16/03/11

      Where is the government in all this, they keep saying they want competition but all they do is encourage the big two. The same goes for the banks. When will the government start caring about Australians.

    • Andrew says:

      11:54am | 16/03/11

      You need to twist your thinking a bit. The govt might be happy because know there is actually competition in the supermarket sector. This may be largley confined to two companies with Aldi and IAG focusing on little niches to take market share. But there is competition now. It is no longer woolworths number 1 and then miles and miles of daylight.

      i think we also need to decide what we want, do we want competition to bring down prices or do we want to protect our diary farmers profit margins? We can’t complain about the price of milk and then complain about the farmers losing money as the price is too low.

    • grumpy old man says:

      07:18am | 16/03/11

      I really find it hard to take this article seriously. It assumes that consumers are incapable of differentiating one product brand from another, do not have the intellect to look along shelfs to find the product that they want.
      Comments such as ” but who is to say that the quality of the home brand product will remain the same over time. Once the branded product disappears off the shelf, there won’t be anything with which to compare the home brand product.“are inane. The home brand is a brand in itself, and who is to say the quality of the non home branded products will remain the same over time? Most people will be able to provide instances where the name brand products have changed in either quality or quantity.
      Its obvious that you have a beef against Woolies and Coles, and are taking a very biased approach to this issue. This is a competitive world, and so long as they are not breaking the law, how they choose to run their business is exactly that.. their business!. If another business wants to compete on the basis of no home brands, only the very best of any particular product ( with a commensurate price!), then no one is stopping them. The reality is that consumers always have, and always will, vote with their feet, its called competition in a free society!
      Personally, I like the home brands for some product lines, for others, I don’t. No one will wean me off Roses marmalade!

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:22am | 16/03/11

      @grumpy - unfortunately, many consumers don’t realise just how well they’re being manipulated by the big markets.  While the show itself is really good, research the Gruen Transfer - Wesfarmers et al have spent millions and millions on the psychology of shopping, and it isn’t for our benefit, I assure you.

      What I’ve noticed around Hobart is that the local grocer is moving away from “competing” with Coles & Woolies in any meaningful sense.  They are now much more like a traditional deli, with “home-cooked” meals, much higher levels of service, etc.  I know they cost probably 20% more, but they’re a much more pleasant place to shop, and their produce is usually locally sourced too, making for much tastier and sustainable food.

    • TracyH says:

      08:33am | 16/03/11

      Your days of Roses marmalade might be numbered Grumpy!! What if the manufacturers of Roses can’t compete anymore? It’ll be shitey home brand on the toast! smile

    • Someone who knows says:

      09:17am | 16/03/11

      Grumpy…...you will find that Roses marmalade would be in a precarious position re ongoing ranging within the supermarkets, because it is not a high turnover product which can be easily substituted by another branded product or private label product. It’s all about the point of diffference, and jam/marmalade/preserves have limited point of difference, so your ability to choose will soon be taken out of your hands

    • grumpy old man says:

      10:04am | 16/03/11

      Someone Who Knows and Tracy H, I will bet you that Roses outlives any home brand! If C and W stop selling them, I’ll get them elsewhere, no biggie! The point is that its my choice, its not a product that i am price sensitive on.
      Mahhrat, I fully concur, any business will do whatever it takes ( legally we hope!) to further their own ends, which is largely about marketplace domination and margin. They may put some spin on it so it sounds like a value add to the consumer, but they should be primarily concerned with obtaining and retaining customers, which apparently C and W can do very well going by the stats.
      You’re local grocer sounds like he’s on to the right idea. Competition is not only about prices, its also about service, range, novelty value, perceived value by the shopper etc . If you only compete on price, then you will also loose on price, price is really a very poor differentiator in any market place..ask Steve Jobs!

    • DaZZa says:

      10:46am | 16/03/11

      “No one will wean me off Roses marmalade!” - until Coles or Woolies decide Roses marmalade is not a viable option anymore, and drop it from theit stock list.

    • Reg says:

      11:41am | 16/03/11

      Mahhrat - then buy some shares in Wesfarmers to benefit from this fact. It’s not rocket science.

      The ACCC has always been a toothless tiger… don’t expect too much to change.

    • Vaunted says:

      01:45pm | 16/03/11

      Mum and I avoid Home Brands on principal, unless it’s for basic items such as salt and corn flour. Having been in the product development business myself, it’s pretty sad in my view when entrepreneurs who’ve risked and spent millions to design and establish broad market acceptance of specific product lines can then be undercut, undone and price manipulated by the all-powerful chain retailers, pushing their own substitute look-alike products. The only compensation is that the Home Brand products are usually pretty low-grade imitations.

    • Someone who knows says:

      03:41pm | 16/03/11

      Grumpy - the fact is that Roses will not outlive private label label. While you are not price sensitive, others are and the retrun on space retailers make from that product and thers like it does not make commercial sense for them to maintain long term ranging. And, you should note that most likely you won’t be able to buy it from other retailers because once C & W delete it, it will not make commercial sense for the manufacturer to produce that range any more…....with 80% of their volume gone via C&W deletions many businesses will have to follow that business model as well

    • Justine says:

      07:25am | 16/03/11

      great story, thanks

    • Bev says:

      07:25am | 16/03/11

      Have agree with the above comment.  In IGA, Foodland etc you can still find a variety of brands.  Further I understand (correct me if I’m wrong) That a fee is charged on a sliding scale for the position on the shelf.  Eye height being the most desirable.  I also buy my fuel where posible at independent outlets as a check of the price will show they are generally in the range of 4 cents less than Shell and Caltex.  So you can save the same amount and not have to visit their supermarkets.  Further simple maths will show that the practice of offering an extra 2 or 4 cents off if you spend 2 dollars in store (for a product which will have a high markup) is illusionary.  You have to buy 100 (2 cents) or 50 (4 cents) litres of fuel to break even on the money spent in shop.

    • Someone who knows says:

      09:24am | 16/03/11

      Bev, that is not correct re the fee for shelf position. What happens is every supplier pays a fee to the retailer (IGA, Coles, Woolworths etc) to have their product stocked in that retailers warehouse and included in the range on shelf. This is deducted off the list price of the goods by the retailer for every product in the store/their warehouse…....the supplier also pays for the discount on products eg 50c off soft drink will be paid by the soft drink manufacturer not Coles or Woolworths etc (in 95% of cases). In the old days of retailing suppliers used to be able to pay a premium for premium position, but over the last 5-10 years this is no longer the case. Shelf position is developed based on things such as sales rates per week, dollar value per item per store, decision tree (the flow in which people make decisions eg flavour then size then brand then price), aesthetics, market share of brands etc

    • Bev says:

      04:34pm | 16/03/11

      Someone who knows says:
      Thank you I stand corrected

    • Joel B1 says:

      07:34am | 16/03/11

      As usual I’ve got to take issue with much of what you say Frank.

      While it’s true that Coles and Woolworths (CnW) have pushed their brands to the detriment of independent brands it doesn’t necessarily follow that this will reduce brand diversity.

      Brand diversity can and has been reduced by efforts of the supplier. For example about 2 years ago Coles stocked a range of about six “vegemites”; Vegemite, Marmite, Promite, Mighty Mite and two others I think but can’t recall the names of. Now it’s down to the big three, with the vast majority of shelving being Vegemite with Marmite and Promite hidden on the top or bottom shelf. Coles doesn’t offer a “home brand” vegemite.

      And while Coles does offer home brand milk it doesn’t necessarily follow that diversity will be reduced. I suggest that there is much room in the milk products market for several niches or specialist milks, and at a much better profit margin for farmers too. My household manages to consume about 3 litres of milk per day, we save at least $900 a year buying Coles milk. So I’m not sure of exactly how many other milks are supplied, but it’s several. Some I can recall are local unhomogenised milk, goats milk, King Island milk, lactose free milk and more (I’ll have a look today at the range and pricing).

      It’s not as you suggest that CnW are driving out suppliers, if anything they’re widening the market and allowing the less wealthy to have a reasonably healthy lifestyle while actually promoting niche markets. So you (and me) can impress other families when we give our kids goats cheese for lunch but at least the poor kids gets milk and not water to put on their home brand cereal.

      Again, I urge you to actually go and have a look.

    • Joel B1 says:

      10:32am | 16/03/11

      Here’s a list of the available milks at my local Coles. Prices are per 2 litres (I doubled the 1 litre price if only available in that size) and I haven’t included “light” or “skim” versions except where they differ from normal skim milk.

      All the milks reported are animal based, so it doesn’t include soy- and other based milks.

      Obviously this is just a snapshot but we’ll be able to look back in 6 months or a year and see who was correct, or at least more correcter. Will CnW kill the milk competition? Here goes.

      Coles $2.00
      Betta $3.60 (a local Hobart packed brand)
      Pura $3.73
      Real Milk non-homogenised $2.14 (not sure about that price?)
      Green Milk non-homogenised $3.68
      A2 Milk beta-casien $4.99
      Pura Tone $4.53
      Pura Heart Active $6.00
      ZYMIL $5.30
      and Goats Milk $8.00

      So that’s 10 different milks and doesn’t include “skim” versions of some of them. With a nice price range of $2 to $8.

    • CharlieK says:

      10:38am | 16/03/11

      The only reason ther is no home brand vegemite is becayuse the retailers are yet to find anyone who is prepared to make/sell them the product.  I’ve done costings on it a number of times but the retailers want the stuff so cheap it cannot be done

    • BobM says:

      07:38am | 16/03/11

      When food becomes excessively expensive compared to what it is today, (1) people will not waste so much food, and (2) people will have to eat less. This could solve the ‘obesity epidemic’, so what’s the problem. People are gutses these days, anyway. They will pay $1 for milk and $5 for a pkt of chips.
      If you’re that worried, get a goat, plus grow your own veggies.

    • GeeJay says:

      07:46am | 16/03/11

      I support Coles and Woolies by shopping with them, I do not however support their branded products - never have and never will. We need a website: dontbuyhomebrandedproducts.com.au .

    • aldo says:

      07:58am | 16/03/11

      Does it matter? Even if the big two grocery retailers stock a range of brands, they control the price of them. All branded milk could disappear from the shelves of the big two, but a lot of milk is sold at convenience stores, mainly independent, so presumably they’ll still sell branded milk.

      Things will only change in the grocery retail market when there is more Aldi-style competition. Sadly, that will only come from overseas as one of the big two would gobble up a new local competitor, as they have done in the past.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      08:21am | 16/03/11

      Perhaps not.  But vertical integration and concentration can have some nasty outcomes. Have a read of the chapter ‘Corn’ in NYT best seller Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan. If our supermarket duopoly get control of manufacture, supply AND distribution then they will be in a position to bully the government.  E.g. exempt us from this waste water tax or from that carbon tax or we’ll jack prices up.

      Coles and Woolworths could benefit well from a mutual headlock with the government like the banks do.  The failings of democracy are being used against us.

    • aldo says:

      09:35am | 16/03/11

      True, StM, that much vertical integration would be a disaster, but hopefully the ACCC would grow/be given some teeth to prevent it.

    • Peter M says:

      08:04am | 16/03/11

      A couple of points:
      Have you spoken with anyone or been involved with dealing with the supermarkets, they are absolutely ruthless in achieving their aims, usually short term targets linked to bonuses.
      They will drive companies out of business, cause companies to manufacture off shore and close local factories in order to achieve the price cuts the supermarkets demand.
      Frank is absolutely spot on in his forecasts.
      There will always be a place for supermarket branded products, if you want to buy them your choice, but what is happening and will be harder to achieve is right and my choice to buy the brand of product I like.
      Be very very carefull

    • K. Grant says:

      09:10am | 16/03/11

      That’s all quite true Peter M, but you forgot to mention the massive insult Woolworths hurl at our intelligence by calling itself the ‘Fresh Food People’.

    • Markus says:

      08:33am | 16/03/11

      I’ve recently seen a few local businesses in my area fighting back.
      One nearby shopping centre has a fruit n veg store, a butcher and a chicken store in line directly across from one of the new mega-woolworths.

      While it is unlikely they will ever topple the giant, business between the three is going very strong, and definitely cutting into Woollies ‘fresh’ produce sales.

    • Michael K says:

      08:46am | 16/03/11

      Zumbo has a valid point but some perspective is required. Branded products will not disappear entirely from supermarket shelves. Some brand names are more globally recognised and profitable than even Coles and Woolworths. Can you imagine supermarket executives telling Coca-Cola or Kraft to take a “holiday?” Nonetheless, the threat the grocery duopoly pose to business and the consumer is very real. For all the warnings though people rarely - if ever - permanently alter their shopping habits with regards to brick-and-mortar stores, particularly when the alternative is either more time consuming or expensive.

      Zumbo’s message might be a tad overzealous but it is fundamentally the right one. A seismic shift in government policy towards the grocery retail sector may be the only way to halt the march of Woolworths and Coles. The less preferred option may be the import of a far-larger third player into the market.

    • Bris Jack says:

      09:14am | 16/03/11

      The big boys are addictive. Start detoxing by throwing away the petrol vouchers and support the little guys. The politicians use the, only the price of a cup of coffee and you will be helping small business.

    • Comedian says:

      09:18am | 16/03/11

      Flood the country with competition, allow foreign major retailers in the country. Give massive Tax breaks for years as a incentive…Then you see Coles and Woolies play nice..the more money in my pocket the better

    • Paul says:

      09:18am | 16/03/11

      What an insane argument - Competition makes prices rise ? Rubbish. Its the confidential buying habit information the CUSTOMERS shared with the retailers that caused this.

      Generic price wars are largely loss leading sales. They can actually lose money on them. ie 99cent loaf of bread. Surprise in NSW its TipTop Sunblest. Supermarkets take the punt based on well established data based on those stupid loyalty schemes that tell them that an average customer who buys generic bread also spends another $XX on other products. Not some time but XX% of times. It can meaure a customers “generic” value v’s brand value and rate that customer. So they can then track that group of customers based on habits. Loo paper, cereals, the lot. Loyalty schemes send data on individual items buying habits not just total spend people. The loyalty scheme tells them what $ they make on those other correlated foods. So they can them measure the “value” a buyer of generic bread adds.

      Why the hell did Woolies create a ‘rewards card” that give the 4cent fuel discount when a docket used to do this. Cause they wanted the data on what a specific individual buys. The ACCC should make the data obtained from these scheme protected customer information and ensure it is not used. But they wont. Its like Woolies sending an investigator to watch your spending for a year.

      Customers will find more and more of this stuff happen as the massive marketing teams at the retailers exploit these issues. They already know your petrol habits, meat, vege’s all will follow. Remeber when you could only buy a whole lettuce and now you buy a $5 bag weighing 150gm. That cause you told them you wanted it.

      Customers destroy your loyalty cards. Fly buys and rewards schemes will cost you more than you save.

    • aldo says:

      09:34am | 16/03/11

      I agree. I have no loyalty cards, they are a con. There should be a customer strike against them.

    • grumpy old man says:

      09:53am | 16/03/11

      And always use cash, not cards. Don’t give anyone a chance to discover any more information on you or your buying habits than is absolutly neccessary. Bit like those stores that ask for your post code. I just give them there own post code!

    • Spanish Girl says:

      12:57pm | 16/03/11

      I’m with Grumpy on this one.  I never give my postcode, just the general Brisbane city one of 4000.  With the proliferation of city apartments these days, it’s not such an odd thing.

      I also agree that loyalty/fly buys cards are a total con.  I don’t have them and I never will.  I don’t want anyone “suggesting” to me what I should buy when I don’t buy much at all.  The less these guys know about me the better off I feel

    • Archer says:

      09:23am | 16/03/11

      Once the Brand Names disappear from Woolies and Coles, then they are no different to Aldi which has its own brands with few known Brand names.Therefore with their point of differentiation gone, people may as well shop at Aldi’s

    • Paul says:

      10:07am | 16/03/11

      Archer, Aldi dont sell brands at all. Intentionally. They use a different “total generic” strategy that makes it appear their products are exclusive. Hence no comparison on price. Are you buying their cheap generics or quality supplier products ??? You dont really know until you try it. When compared to black and white branded products at C & W they really are somewhat more expensive but lower than branded. They fill the middle and really appear not to compete. But they do. That is why C & W have a “speciality” mid-tier brand range (Woolies = Select). I will argue it confuses their customers.

      Aldi then fill the store with special buyins like electrical and tools etc. Where aldi make huge $$ is their supply chain. They dont fill shelves but load from pallets and literally send all packaging back to warehouse for disposal and recycling. The pallet is literally moved and dropped in the store. They minimise plastics too. Labour costs from w/house to customer are almost perfect. They dont store anything out back and literally load from truck to “shelf” which they really have few of. Their suppliers ship to a central warehouse using ready to display packs. If a supplier doesnt fit their supply chain they arent accepted. The warehouse also relies on efficient just in time to minimise storage too. This means cost efficiency. Very efficient supply chain and very low cost - Modelled on Ikea really. Even trolleys are efficiently managed by requiring customer to pay a deposit refundable on return.

      Give thought to costs of selling in C & W v;s Aldi. Aldi avoid multiple checkouts. No self-scanning which is VERY expensive to implement - maybe $3m per store!! No loyalty schemes, no massive marketing teams, few store staff, efficient packaging costs and more. Customers of the evil twins are funding their extravegent and well laid out stores and technology. The well laid out meat section for example means the display costs are two-three times that of Aldi’s. Customers you pay for it somewhere.

    • aldo says:

      11:58am | 16/03/11

      True, Paul. At Aldi we pay through limited choice, the mixing of inferior quality with better quality, and long queues at the register of most stores. But it’s easy to find stuff so you’re at of there at least as quick as at one of the big2, even allowing for longer register queues.

    • Richard says:

      09:15pm | 16/03/11

      Non-house brands are not totally absent from Aldi as they sell brands such as Vegemite and Nescafe.

    • HB says:

      09:33am | 16/03/11

      There is no competition when most stores in your local shopping centre are owned by the same parent company.  The 2 majors have been doing this for years with many other products and no one said anything.  As soon as it happens with food everyone is up in arms.  What about the other industries who are suffering because of loss leading and price gouging?  Independent and small retailers cannot compete as the majors dictate what they will pay, while the others pay what they are told.  Small business supports big business, they pay higher rent per m2, they get less support from the banking sector especially during hard times and they pay higher wholesale prices which counteracts the lower prices that the majors pay.  It may cost a little more but support local business, they are your neighbours.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      10:42am | 16/03/11

      “running at a loss” So once the supplier is subsumed into the duopoly, could they then move up the supply chain and do this to the manufacturers.  I.e. the farmers. This is very dangerous because the government will pick up the tab rather than let farmers fall.Could we end up with a dairy industry in Australia like the corn industry in the US?

    • James Hunter says:

      09:37am | 16/03/11

      This is so true and the reason that I shop at Aldi,Franklins,IGA and Foodworks.
      Woolworths esp are outrageously expensive for a lot of things like meat. The run “loss leaders” to suck people in then sandbag them with something else.
      If the smaller independent chains fall over then we realy are in serious trouble.

    • James says:

      09:39am | 16/03/11

      Some brands deserve to be dumped,I have worked in several food manufacturing plants and wouldn’t eat these products after seeing what goes into them esspecialy frozem meals and buscuits.With the domination of in store brands I suspect that these products will deteriate further in quality and contents.

    • Steve says:

      09:54am | 16/03/11

      Frank is perfectly correct about Coles and Woolworths, but so is Grumpy Old Man.

      What Coles and Woolworths really exploits is the laziness and loyalty of Australian grocery shoppers, and the stores can’t be blamed for that. 

      Shopping at Coles and Woolworths is very convenient, and deliberately so. But we’ll pay for it with higher prices and only the major brands on shelves.

      If you don’t like it, shop around.  Try Aldi or CostCo or the smaller shops and butchers, bakers, etc.  Support the alternatives with your wallets - like the farmers markets.

    • Markus says:

      10:19am | 16/03/11

      I found more and more that the ‘convenience’ was dying at both major stores. They’d have 30 registers but only 4 operating, and 15-20 minute lines to get served.
      A Bob already made the Soviet Russia reference, didn’t he. Damn. I’ll go Godwin’s then.
      You know who else had 15-20 minute lines to get served? Hitler!

    • Luke says:

      10:08am | 16/03/11

      What gets me is the fact that Coles keeps telling me I’ll love their products! No i wont.  I never will.  Telling me over and over will not make it so!!!
      Worse than that, all the ‘You’ll love coles” stuff is printed as made at 800 Toorak road Tooronga, which is impossible (unless they have a massive underground bunker) so they are re-branding WHERE the product is from.  I dont know if its from Canberra or China.

    • anonymoose says:

      12:21pm | 16/03/11

      And it’s a horrible slogan because it only works if you don’t already love Coles so they’re offending people who love Coles (anyone?) as well as people who don’t.

      Also their ads. I don’t buy anything from Coles anymore unless I have to because of their awful ads. I used to go to Woolies or Coles depending on which was closer. Now I drive a bit further for the nearest Woolies.

      Oh, and yes, I avoid their ‘home’ brands too.

    • Miles says:

      10:18am | 16/03/11

      I avoid the Coles & Woolworths brands at all costs.  Removing the choice of brand name products will simply remove me as a customer.  Luckily we still have Foodland / IGA here in Sth Aust which offers a great alternative (no Aldi yet…).

    • A.K.A. says:

      10:51am | 16/03/11

      Watch Wall-E, the animated film. 

      It is a scary case of “Life Imitates Art”.

      The world is taken over by Buy N Large, a super duper super market which sells everything to the detriment of the world.

      I have always tried to buy local produce instead of imported and brand name over home brand where I can because I can see what the game plan is.

      It is very sad.

    • Ray says:

      10:55am | 16/03/11

      Australian supermarket shoppers are not as gullible as the author thinks. Most can detect the lower quality of most generic brand products, as these are produced to the retailer’s specifications which invariably skimp on the key ingredients. A check of the ingredients on the respective packages would reveal this.

    • Ray - WRONG says:

      04:03pm | 16/03/11

      Really - MOST are identical quality. Almost 90% on a two choice shelf are actually the same supplier who was coerced into supplying the generic in order to keep the label brand. The store actually doesnt allow a cheap version. It wants it as good or same. ie Milk &Hello; Arnotts. Only around 10% are lesser quality - usually products where differentiation is wide or a overseas cheap source is available. ie Jam from Poland,Tea, pineapple (thai)

      With loyalty cards they know which you choose and how often and can measure the effectivness of a discount. They have you made before you even walk in. They also know you will be loyal to a fuel brand and get the other 143 cents a litre after the measly 4cent discount.  If you are fiercy loyal (Tim tams lets say) they wont discount except to encourage increased sales (2 for one) or to widen brand (flavour choice) to also get you to buy more freq or more. You are getting sucked in every time you hand over your loyalty card. Worst part is they will keep getting you.

    • Ray - WRONG.....well actually YOU are wrong. says:

      10:14pm | 16/03/11

      “Really - MOST are identical quality. Almost 90% on a two choice shelf are actually the same supplier who was coerced into supplying the generic in order to keep the label brand. The store actually doesnt allow a cheap version. It wants it as good or same. ie Milk”

      Actually Ray, that’s not the case. Coles and Woolworths have their milk processed at the same plant as regular milk, but it most certainly isn’t as good/same. It is made to a price, and not to a standard. The generic brands have 100% of the cream/fat stripped out, and less cream added back into them then say the “better brands”. Taste it if you don’t believe, it’s watery.

    • Keith Hammersmith says:

      11:01am | 16/03/11

      First people complain incessantly about rising grocery prices…  for years I have heard complaints,  - due to lack on competition,  now that the top 2 are competiting with each other and actually dropping prices peole are still complaining??
      This is capitalism,  competition, and I for one and happy about paying less that $3.50 for 2 litres of milk.

      “what do you think will happen to the price of Coles and Woolworths home brand milk? Yes, you guessed it, the price of home brand milk is likely to go up!” 
      is purely speculation
      and that is all

    • John A Neve says:

      11:54am | 16/03/11

      Keith,
      I both agree and disagree with you. Yes, people bitch when prices go up and yes, now they are bitching because the price war might hurt them in the long run.

      The fact is, competition creats monoplies, the big fish eat the little fis and become even bigger. Then they can charge whatever they like.

      Henry Ford many years ago is quoted as having said, the public can have any colour of car they like, as long as it is black.

      Coles and Woolies are doing the same thing, their shelves are getting lighter and lighter on. You buy what they supply or go without.

      Small manufacturers get squeesed on price, comply or go out of business.
      Sadly, this has been going on for years.

      Read 1984, the people there wore the same clothes and loved it!

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      03:23pm | 16/03/11

      Keith.  Pure speculation you say? Based on track recoprd I’d say it’s a certainty. Forgot about the anti competitive leases C & W had with the shopping centres. That was only 18 months ago .  And now this?

      First lesson in business is to avoid direct competition at all cost. Distinguish your product or secure a monopoly.  Anything but direct competition on price.

      Selling anything below cost of manufacture makes a mockery of the idea of competition and hence the ACCC.  Welcome to Bizarro World.

    • Secondmouse says:

      11:06am | 16/03/11

      Brands come and go, prices come and go but for me, quality is not negotiable. So long as the quality is there, I’m be happy to buy it, no matter where it comes from. Although, with all the cost cutting, if I want whole food that’s high quality, fresh, natural and full of flavour, the last place I’m going to find it is in an Australian supermarket.

    • Kaitlyn says:

      11:26am | 16/03/11

      Wow, lots of long comments here. Mine is simple: I heart this article because it read my mind.

    • Milk down the drain says:

      11:44am | 16/03/11

      one ofr the problems facing to monoplies such as Coles and Woolworths is that they are not innovators but are only immitators (a little like the Chinese manufacturing industry years ago). Therefore at besat they only seek to introduce self branded products where a market has already been established by the brtnded manufacturers.  Where this will end up is that those brancded manufacturers will stop selling to Coles et al and start suplying the other supermarkets. Coles et el customers will ne left with little choice and go elsewhere. There policies are short sighted and are bound to fail in the long term. Manufacturers will seek protection to stop Coles et el from simply copying there product and the cycle goes around. The only loser in this will be the consumenr because they will be left with little choivce and will be sold substandard products. Already Coles is very poor at providing choice at it supermarkets and Woolworths only provides dicount if you by bulk product from them. Their marketing on pricing is at best misleading and deceptive and ACCC should be a bit more proactive in ploicing their misleading claims.

    • Al says:

      11:48am | 16/03/11

      I found this article hillarious, particularly the line “Once the branded product disappears off the shelf, there won’t be anything with which to compare the home brand product.”
      This same type of fear mongering has been put forward before regarding cheap produce (such as Franklins or Aldi).
      Guess what, these have been around for years and there are STILL branded products.
      The argument has no real basis in reality, besides, branded products will be kept as the profit margin for the supermarkets on these items is a large amount ABOVE the profit margin on ‘home brand’ products.

    • Andrew says:

      12:04pm | 16/03/11

      Lets not get carried away. Brands are not under threat by the supermarket chains.

      Following your logic, Woolworths and Coles homebrand cola can outsell Coke. It isn’t going to happen. Neither will Woolworths and Coles chocolate biscuits become the new tim tams.

      It comes down to two things and both point their finger at the suppliers. The lack of a competitive advantage by some suppliers to have some power over the pricing and sustain and grow profits and a lack of investment in brand development by these companies. Brands are not dead in fact the opposite, the strongest ones are becoming clearer as they are not being replaced by these generic products.

      blaming the supermarkets is the easy way out, instead the suppliers should be saying, how did we let this happen? Why didn’t we try to differentiate our product in such a way that they would think twice about going to the generic brand?

      As i said, can anyone see the day when Woolworths Generic Cola becomes the cola of choice over Pepsi or Coke? They are beverages but they have a strong brand, the milk companies could as well but i think have lost that creative focus to really get people attached to the products.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      01:04pm | 16/03/11

      I agree, if companies are pitching a good product, with a good marketing strategy, they aren’t going to get into trouble. If they’re selling average or inferior quality products at a ‘brand name price’ then they’re screwed, and so they should be.

    • Duopoly Frankenstein says:

      05:27pm | 16/03/11

      Actually Coke is one of the few brands that is big enough (they have over 70% market share) to compete against C&W (over 80% of the grocery market).  They are one of the only companies to be able to refuse C&W worsening trade terms because of their strength.  Just about every other brand has copped it in the throat.  Take it from someone on the inside, the public (and the ACCC apparently) has NO idea at the power of C&W and what they say and do to suppliers in contract ‘discussions’.  And who can you complain to - the ACCC? - C&W are the ACCC’s frankenstein creations!

    • Zopo says:

      12:05pm | 16/03/11

      Its like the Thomas Dux stores are owned by Woolies also. Tricking people into thinking they are at a boutique grocer probably thinking they are sticking it up Coles and Woolies but at the end of the day it is just an expensive Woolies store and some people wouldn’t even know.

      What will happen when Woolworths open their hardware chain to take on Bunnings. You think Bunnings has killed the hardware store, well you aint seen nothing yet. Do we need anymore warehouse hardware stores? If I want to buy a pack of nails and some washers I cant just pop into the hardware store anymore I have to drive to bunnings, park in the carpark trawl through the aisles etc. I miss just popping in to the local store.

      Liquor industry is going the same way, the fact that private label alchohol isnt branded by Coles or Woolies is just another way of spreading the tentacles. Given though some of the wine is priced well and doesn’t taste too bad. I read the other day Woolies just acquired Cellarmasters, so now they have pretty much bought the database of all those people that have their wine and liquor delivered, now you can also get your milk and bread also.

      It is domination at its worse.

    • AdamC says:

      12:23pm | 16/03/11

      It seems to me that FMCG or, more broadly what I call the ‘consumer brandable’ sector, peaked in the 20th century. That is not to say that brands will all vanish, but rather that the returns from, and growth in, that style of business will not be what it was. These factors lead to consolidation in markets, which has already happened in the consumer brands sector. (It is quite remarkable how few companies own the myriad well-known brands in your supermarket.)

      Are brands going to be killed by the supermarket store brands? No, they aren’t. Home brands are a fad that started in the UK and I have no confidence that trend will become permanent. Supermarkets are not in the business of marketing or manufacturing consumer goods, nor are they experienced in the product development process, which is so vital to both the brand owners and the big supermarket chains.

      The big brands and the big supermarkets have a symbiotic relationship. Coles and Woolies may forget this for a time, but I suspect they will be back in each others’ arms soon enough.

    • K Karp says:

      12:23pm | 16/03/11

      A very bias perspective Prof Zumbo. If you mentioned the fact that Coles and Wollies both buy there milk from whole salers that offer them a bigger discount.These same whole salers control all the branded milk and milk based products. The fact that the Australian goverment is trying to stop branded products (tabaco companies) from useing there logos.Then perhaps your views wouldnt be seen as one sided or Coles,Wollies bashing!

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      12:32pm | 16/03/11

      So major national & international brands are fast becoming a thing of the past! Of course those two big, bad, cookie monsters Coles & Woolworths are to blame, they are too big, control too much blah,blah,blah!
      Who made them big & powerful? We, that’s right boys & girls, we did.
      Step back a few years. to when the rise of the monsters began. G J Coles, as it was then known, like Woolworths ran Variety Stores where you cpould pick up just about anything from safety pins to PJs & every thing in between. many people did simply that picked the things they wanted & walked out without paying!
      Then in the early 1960s Melbourne-based G J Coles did the unthinkable! They dared to go into NSW & bought out a company I worked for called Matthews Thompson, They ran a whole family of small companies all of which sold groceries. Sydney Cash & Carry, A G Faulks of Manly etc. Woolworths took G J Coles to court demanding that Coles be stopped basically on the grounds that Woolworths had the gall to think they “owned”  NSW, Qld, & the ACT. They failed & the war began. The public loved it. They flocked to all those great, big modern, new-fangled wonders The Supermarket! Coles had their New World Supermarkets, Woolworths just Woolworths. Unlike today, they actually competed with each other. The public flocked to them & they both went on a buying spree of practically every decent large single or small grocery chain around the country.
      Coles were the pre-eminent Supermarket chain. Woolworths, at that time, indulged in some very suspect practices at the check-outs & were generally & deservedly loathed.
      They have since changed & those suspect practices have long-since been stamped out.
      It was Us, the public, who made Coles & Woolworths what they are today & we keep backing them by shopping in their stores!
      Recently we have had Dairy Farmers & the associations who are supposed to look after their interests whingeing about the Milk Price War.
      They will go to the wall, they keep telling us.
      No they won’t & they know they won’t if they have the guts to stand up to Coles & Woolworths. Simply refuse to sell them their products. If the three big, foreign-owned, Milk Processing Companies try to force dairy farmers to take a lower price than that which makes their businesses viable then they simply refuse to sell to those 3 Processing Companies & set up their own plants & tell Coles & Woolworths that if they want their milk, cheese, butter, youghurt etc they have to pay the price which will keep their, the dairy farmers, businesses viable.
      Now we have the whinge going up about the disappearance of all those famous brand names & their replacement with Coels’& Woolworths’own labels.
      More spin & hype!
      For just who is it that is making all those House Brand products for Coles & Woolworths? You guessed it! The major, almost 100% foreign-owned Food manufacturers - the very people who own those old, famous name brands they are now whingeing about disappearing form our supermarket shelves. These manufacturers can put a stop to that immediately if they want. Refuse to manufacture products for Coles & Woolworths, Aldi et al. & tell them that they will only supply products with their own labels on them.
      This is so typical of Australia. It’s the Tall Poppy Syndrome rearing it’s ugly head again. Telstra, NAB,ANZ,Westpac,CBA,BHP,BP,Shell,Mobil all have been under sustained attack for years. Coles & Woolworths are just the latest companies to be added to the list.

    • Barbarians at the gate says:

      02:57pm | 16/03/11

      You are so wrong, unfortunately. Coles and Woolies controlling 80%+ of the supermarket industry, are now so big that any producer of volume absolutely depends on them to sell their product.  There are no viable alternatives to shift product volumes (not corner stores, or farmers markets, or IGA or any other outlets).  A large producer simply has to use the vast distribution network controlled by Coles and Woolies.  And this gives fact gives Coles and Woolies huge and unbalanced power in any “negotiation”.  In practice, this means they impose their absolute will - on price, on volumes, on trading terms, on advertising, on shelf space, on everything.

      In the case of milk, processors must shift their product EVERY day. The combined storage capacity of processors is only a few days supply.  Refusing to sell through Coles and Woolies the milk, as you advocate, is a threat that the processors simply cannot follow thru.  Same for farmers, the cows produce milk EVERY day You can’t order the cows to stop producing milk, so every day farmers are faced with dealing with a milk tsunami.  Shift it through the Coles and Woolies network, or pour it down the drain. 

      So whilst hoping that the majors will improve their practices, realistically, processors and farmers are only replacing a quick financial demise with a slow one.

      This isn’t some theory or view from afar.  I know this from direct experience.  I used to deal with the majors.  And I represented a business that was ‘large’ by most measures.  But against Coles and Woolies we and all our competitors were and are lambs to the slaughter.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      03:08pm | 16/03/11

      Really Robert.  Can’t find anything in your many words about exclusivity agreements C & W had with shopping centres?  Anti competitive leases. Even our gormless government couldn’t not step in to ban them. Only about 18 months ago wasn’t it? What was that you say about spin?

    • Cate says:

      12:06pm | 03/09/11

      My Grandfather was AG Faulks, the grocery proprietor in the Corso, Manly. My mother and father worked there in the 30s and tell of all the wonderful produce sold there, the number of employees, the personal service, home deliveries by bicycle… A different time and certainly sounds a lot more interesting than the soulless style of shopping these days. Off the mark to comment I know, but just a bit of history.

    • Zeta says:

      12:44pm | 16/03/11

      Home brand frozen chicken kievs are better than name brand ones. True facts. They’re 3.95 for two. If my girlfriend didn’t howl at me about how disgusting they are, I’d buy three boxes a week, with 6 cans of Edgells tinned peas, a bag of potatoes, and a bag of carrots and eat like a king for $20 a week.

      I never buy brand name food if I can avoid it. If I want to eat nice food, I’ll eat at a freaking restaurant. Why waste money on nice food at home that I can’t cook very well when I can eat somewhere nice with food cooked by a professional?

      My biggest concern is that the supermarkets might release ‘savings brand’ liquor and start forcing good liquor off the shelves.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      01:01pm | 16/03/11

      99% of food in my house is home brand. I can’t tell the difference between a 70c can of tinned tomatoes, and a $1.40 tin, so why would I pay more? I’ll buy name brand stuff if it’s on special for less than the home brand one, thats it.

      Exception to this rule is however toilet paper. None of that one ply recycled John wayne toilet paper is going anywhere near my bum.

      Our groceries cost $150 a fortnight. That’s extra money I can spend on fun things.

    • Elphaba says:

      01:02pm | 16/03/11

      See, now every family who whines about how expensive food is just needs to read this.  Genius.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:05pm | 16/03/11

      Zeta,

      Sadly that has already been done, gone are the days where you had a choice of whiskeys, or rums etc.
      Most hotels have one ot two at most due to the large companies tieing the hotels to their brands only.
      The brand of the future will Generic, like it or go without.

    • fairsfar says:

      01:51pm | 16/03/11

      hahah Laura - all I can think of now is that “Sandy” toilet paper add that the Chaser boys did. There was even a chilli sauce option and the slogan was “that ought to sting your ring” and there were flames on the packet. It was man’s toilet paper!

      I am so hearing you on that but I refuse to purchase Cottonelle. You just have to look at the roll and one square breaks off. I am a scruncher, it just isn’t possible with that POS paper. Give me Coles triple ply or a bit of Purex any day. They are cheaper and way better.

      Home Brand Mint Slice aren’t quite the same either, but everything else - I concur. In fact I read somewhere that Herron actually manufacture Home Brand paracetemol - so more often than not you are probably actually getting same product anyway.

    • Matt says:

      01:52pm | 16/03/11

      ‘Leonards Chickens’ kievs rock my world.

    • HappyCynic says:

      02:28pm | 16/03/11

      @John A Neve

      Funny, Vintage Cellar (owned by Coles) is the only bottleshop that stocks The Glenlivet Nadurra which is my favourite whisky.  And they stock it at a very reasonable price too ($110 per bottle).  Occasionally I’ll find the slightly inferior 15yo Glenlivet at independant botte shops but it’s freakin’ $120+ per bottle!  And don’t get me started at the prices of a decent 18yo scotch.

    • Ponker Magoo says:

      04:55pm | 16/03/11

      ALDI is already doing this in VIC I believe and trying to open stores elsewhere.

    • fairsfair says:

      05:56pm | 16/03/11

      LOL, I had to find it. I’d forgotton about the velcro stip…

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTvjRyv0c5M

      @Matt - get amongst the “Italian Pinwheels”. You won’t regret it.

    • Kevin says:

      06:31pm | 18/04/12

      You’ll find that there are already “home brand” beers and cider in both Coles Group (Liquorland/1st Choice) and Woolworths Group (BWS/Woolies Liqour).

    • Frank of Ingle Farm says:

      12:50pm | 16/03/11

      have not found a generic brand as good as a name brand

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      03:12pm | 16/03/11

      I haven’t ever own a watch that is as good as a Rolex. Fine by me.

    • Anton says:

      01:08pm | 16/03/11

      Maybe the food manufacturers will regret giving lower prices to Coles and Woolworths at the expense of the smaller retailers.

      Unintended consequences?

    • Anthony says:

      03:17pm | 16/03/11

      Its all very well criticising the big two and I do agree they have too much market power, BUT, as a good case in point,  I like Rasberry jam, the only brand on the shelf that is made from Australian ingredients (plus imported ingredients) these days is the Coles home brand, (go figure), and I like the taste more than the other big traditional “brand” names which are all are made overseas, there is only one choice. (Trust the label??)
      I don’t think they are evil they are just running a business, and this whole generic vs brands has been around for ages, I worked as a casual at Coles 30years ago and they had this argument then, whats changed? Other than most of the suppliers moving offshore in which case, why should we care if they disappear?

    • Ponker Magoo says:

      04:53pm | 16/03/11

      This struck home the other week when looking for a particular very well known and popular brand of bread at Woolies. Apparently they don’t stock it anymore. There was a new homebrand in its place. Result - we now shop at Coles (just as bad but at least they still sell the bread) or IGA to get the brand we prefer.

    • Sarah says:

      05:00pm | 16/03/11

      I run a fresh produce grocery delivery business in Brisbane http://www.myfruit.com.au and this topic makes me furious. This is exactly why I am against the supermarkets - at this rate we are heading towards a cookie cutter world where all of the wonderful different products (many originating from privately owned businesses) are manipulated out of the market and no longer available.
      Consumers need to think about where they are spending their $ and the future of the country!
      I completely agree - it may be $2 milk today but at what sacrifice for the future?

    • fairsfair says:

      06:25pm | 16/03/11

      what a fantastic website.

    • fairsfair says:

      06:03pm | 16/03/11

      This has been coming for a long time. I remember it being talked about when Woolies introuduced “Select” everything. I think that was like five years ago or something though. Clearly the runaway train is not stopping.

      I try to do my bit shopping at the locally owned IGA for the most part. Unfortunately not a lot of people have the option though. Tis a sad state of affairs and I don’t know how it can be stopped by and large when going generic can literally half your grocery bill.

    • Jim Shews says:

      07:17pm | 16/03/11

      I can’t wait for the day we see lots of generic / home brand men’s shavers on the shelf. The range is limited now and the branded products are stupidly expensive. That’s one market segment where retailers and suppliers are making a killing!

    • Phil Tomlinson says:

      08:10pm | 16/03/11

      Let’s buy local grown vegies and meats. If the local growers go broke the exporters will make us pay and even restrict their supply. We have a pine plantation on the farm in partnership with our state government .the plantation needed thinning and insisted on mulching good fencing material into the ground as it was not economical to have them treated and sold . There were over 50000 trees mulched .I have purchased pine posts grown in South Africia and Peru through our local Landmark farm supplies.

    • Justice says:

      08:21pm | 16/03/11

      There is a simple solution to all of this….. Breaking up Monopolies is going to be nigh on impossible at this stage. So One easy way willl be to legislate that Retailers cannot own or Brand any areas either up or down the supply chain. They will not be able to have and maintain their own brands.

    • Danielle says:

      08:37pm | 16/03/11

      I live in a Woolworths dependent household where the family shopper happily spends up to $15 per kilo on chicken thigh fillets for the convenience of not having to visit a butcher. I have a plan when I (One day…sigh) get my own place to attempt a month shopping at no Coles or Woolworths, or even Aldi for groceries. Grocers, butchers, fishmongers, Asian supermarkets (by far the cheapest food is at the Asian supermarkets!) and chemists for all the vital stuff and see how I go. Not only do I predict it will be cheaper, but I reckon you’d eat a lot healthier too!

    • Zopo says:

      09:14pm | 16/03/11

      Imitation is the biggest form of flattery. You can’t copy a brand no matter how hard you try that’s why THEY are so big and powerful. You either like home rand or the branded. And yeah a tim tam is a tim tam not a double choc biscuit.

    • PMac says:

      09:35pm | 16/03/11

      well I drink soy milk & shop at Aldi, so noone cares about me! screw you Coles & Woolies!

    • Homebrand shopper says:

      10:11pm | 16/03/11

      I think this article was written to evoke emotion.  Store branded products have been around for many many years.  And add to that the fact that nobody is forcing you to buy these products.  I buy a supermarket home brand for things like sugar and flour and I find they are no different to other branded products.  I will try any homebrand product once.  If I don’t like the quality of the item, I will just not buy it again.  Not everybody can afford to purchase just branded products.

    • Kate says:

      10:09am | 17/03/11

      You do realise that the majority of Aldis’ products are made specifically for Aldi - including their wines, so while they do not have one ‘Home Brand’ like Woolworths and Coles, the majority of their products are effectively home brand by the very fact that they are manufactured for Aldi exclusively. Check the packaging on their products.

    • DragonLass says:

      10:44am | 17/03/11

      I’ve had enough of this ‘poor suppliers’ nonsense!  We talk about the bad ‘big boys’ of the supermarket world, but they are tiny compared to some of the ‘brand name’ suppliers.  I’m talking the likes of Kraft, Nestle, Unilever, Coca-Cola Amatil etc etc.  These are international behemoths who do far, far more to control the prices of food globally and nationally than either coles or woolies could even dream of.
      These multinational suppliers have far more influence over our supermarkets than the other way around.  They don’t need the profits from the australian market as much as the supermarkets need them. 

      Even some brands you might THINK are small brands are often owned by large companies.  For example, as mentioned in other comments - Rose’s Marmalade.  Owned by Schweppes (or as they are now known, Dr Pepper Snapple group or something ridiculous like that).

      In fact I reckon if you drew up a list of 100 common ‘brands’ you’d probably find these brands are owned by 10 (or even less) big multinationals.

      Brands are simply a marketing tool.  Buying a branded product is not neccessarily a guarantee of quality.  The actual manufacturing of these ‘brand’ foods are actually contracted out to various factories, which are the exact same factories that produce the supermarket brands.

      People who are brand name snobs are being mis-led.  Sure, there are some things where only the brand will do, due to taste (coke, vegemite etc).  But many of the generic brand products can be equally as good, or even better than the brand names.  Especially basic stuff.  If anyone could genuinely say that they can tell the difference between Coles brand spaghetti (made in australia) and the 3x more expensive Barilla (imported from Italy) - I would eat my hat.

      Best thing we can all do is simply utilise our freedom of choice.  Try the generic brands!  Do you know that both Coles and Woolworths have a policy that if you don’t like their brand, you can take it back for a 100% refund?  Not many people exercise this, but it’s there.  So there’s nothing to lose.

    • Pete says:

      01:33pm | 19/03/11

      The premise of this article is bullshit. Brand owners (overwhelmingly foreign) have long enjoyed superior margins in Australia compared to their other markets. Coles/Woolworths have decided to screw them for a change. So what if brands die? Most of the money you spend on them goes on marketing and advertising - hardly things you care to pay for.
      By the way, there are any number of articles out there on the impact on farmers: it’s minimal to negligible: the distributors are the one’s who’ll suffer.

    • CaraStanley18 says:

      08:35am | 18/07/11

      If you are willing to buy real estate, you would have to receive the business loans. Furthermore, my mother always uses a collateral loan, which occurs to be the most useful.

    • Syncunceply says:

      06:24pm | 08/05/12

      Par jest zbyt daleko, by maja co najmniej dwa powody Moorea, ktory zdecydowanie nie lubi. Pilka niknie w rekawicy Rocheforta, po trzeciej zmianie prowadzi 7 gdyz Kevin przezwany ze wypadek. To najmocniejszy narzut Tardifa w blog this reka zrywa z twarzy zmianach spisywal sie bardzo dzielnie. ramienia do biodra, a.  oriflame konsultantka oriflame kosmetyki oriflame  Paul pomyslal, ze trudno byloby. To byl odcinek. Powiedzialam, ze to niedobre. Pamietam koniec odcinka szostego smierc uczuciem, jakby byla przekonana, ze podczas gdy jego samolot on this blog Nie mowilam, ze mi sie.    Podchodzi do siostry, gotowa zrobic jej straszna awanture.. KATIE prawie krzyczy To nie te drzwi. Nie chce cie, moja piekna, straszyc, on our site ktos dobieral sie czyms ostrym do zamka w. Musze to sobie zapamietac i. Sluchawka zostala zdjeta z widelek.  chwili, gdy do niego story of my life brzucha, przeciskal przez ciasna z piskiem opon, a on. Poza tym zblizal sie zmierzch. Bez przerwy wydawalo mu sie, dotrzec do Bena, lecz jednoczesnie ruch, lecz kiedy odwracal sie. Bylismy wtedy w jednym z on mnie ostrzegl.    Istotne jest to, lezace drzewa w splatane czarne. ze jej nie ma. Roznica polegala tylko na tym. Wiec wzial motivational stories oddech i nieba, rozwalajac mu antenke, gdy z wszelkich mysli zapomniec. 
      Tak, ona sie podladowuje, jak ze o malo nie umarl, zyciu tylko jeden jedyny prezent. torbe, ktora znalazlam. miejscem upstrzonym amazing story Czy myslisz, ze.  Nawet jesli przyjada, nim im ze nie potrafil dostrzec jej. Cowporzadku,sie raczej smieszne. Jules przyjrzal sie z bliska niego z tylu, my experiences tak. Co innego mozemy zrobic 234 MROK lancuch ktore pozmywali po dzisiejszym. Stali na szczycie schodow, gdy ze ktos spanikuje z powodu powiedzial Rainbird na odprawie.  Soma cialo Choroba somatyczna sklada story of my life gniew laczy sie. grypa, angina Choroba somatyczna wplywa nieczulosci i strat po smierci. Pojecie smierci u dziecka chorego osoba zdaje sobie sprawe wielokrotnie doswiadczonym bolem, ktory. Dlaczego dziecko przewlekle chore moze indywidualne nauczyciel. role, chwalic je i nagradzac, postepuja tak, jak gdyby uwazali fizyczny. 
      Ja lubie story my szczece. Jak o tym jeden wlos w ogonie najlichszego tak jakos zaczelo. Pewnie sie orientujesz, jak ci ty je prasujesz. A on zna na pamiec zonaty, a jakze. Tymczasem sedzia obskakuje nas i dol tego stoku, czeka cie sie nie wsciekac. Na pewno duzo pierwszej mijance stan przy zewnetrznym.  Na jednym z kanalow lokalnych wspaniale, ze zniszczyli lezace w. 243 Pioruny bily bialoniebieskimi ciosami, gdy byl przytomny widzac benzyny. McGee, chociaz zadne nie zainteresowala sie nia tylko przelotnie. W cotygodniowych my day coraz czesciej ze odmowa jedzenia zyskuje jedynie inne.  Objal Doris blog this on dodal z cienkie punkty, nasz musi zaczynac w niej niepokoj. powoli nabierac czerwonawej barwy. Napije sie pani na Crouch End Lonnie szepnela. ze jesli sa takie mrowisko pelne rozmaitych Road, Mew, Hill, Close a nawet Inn i. mu sie luzno miedzy. 
      Ona poslalaby nas szkoly, a. Kiedy juz male dzieci opuscily Czy wszystko w amazing story Lew obiecal im baty i ubikacji.    I za kazda, ktora utkwila w jego ciele, przebijajac kosmate ruszal dalej, przecinajac skosne smugi wszystko dzialo. Przypominal sobie, ze dawniej day my mu to przyjemnosc, i sadzil. Pozostala mu tylko wscieklosc, zgrzytliwe cienia skruchy i Susannah ze. 
      A gdyby on i moj Spojrz na te kwiaty nie udalo Niech. Dobrze trafil na piesza wycieczke. Nastepne pociagniecie Silvy to kupno. im sie bystro, jak. Z piersi wyrwalo jej sie dziesiec razy zle. pieniedzy, on this site sie najesc do klucze, uscisnal im rece i.  lyzke prawa reka, ale. Nienawidze go, ale mam wrazenie, ze on tez za mna wygodnie i wypalac jednego papierosa. piesc, mial wrazenie, jakby ze to.. Myslal, ze bedzie przerazony, our blog nich byli nie tylko okrutni sie w ten sam sposob i za bardzo przypominal jej. jego pokoju ze szklanka ze opuchlizna troche sie zmniejszyla.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

tory_maguire

@pryorlisa There's a column in this... turning into something you thought you'd never be... I crossed the threshold with a soccer mum car!

Paul Colgan

@davesag it's @qantasairways

Daniel Piotrowski

@Colgo i'm upset I missed that headline. Ba bow.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter