In the dying days of the1996 election campaign Paul Keating famously said “when you change the government, you change the country” in an attempt to scare people away from taking the baseball bat to his Prime Ministership.  He did it on the basis that the Australian people recognised John Howard and what he had stood for over the years.  The line didn’t work, the government changed and so to did the country.

Trying to make Australia in his own image. Photo: Lannon Harley

In 2007 when the doom of the campaign set in, John Howard used the same line to try and get people to focus on what Kevin Rudd really stood for.  This was ultimately a difficult task because at that time what Rudd offered the public was one great contradiction. 

For instance he had described the day of the introduction of the GST as “fundamental injustice day” but campaigned as an “economic conservative”. 

Following a visit to Iraq in late 2002 he had said: “Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. That is a matter of empirical fact,” but proceeded to question the motive for military action in Iraq.

Even today he defies logic by arguing that his approach to asylum seekers arriving by boat in northern Australia is “humane but tough”. It’s like being drunk and sober at the same time.

Rudd could do this before the election because he had very little public history to haunt him; he had not been a minister as had most previous Prime Ministers nor had he been a larger than life public figure.  His most famous achievement prior to entering Parliament was being the chief bureaucrat of the Queensland public service.  It is fair to say that going into the Prime Ministership Kevin Rudd was the blankest canvas ever to take the reins of our country.

Two years later we are starting to see Kevin Rudd’s true colours emerge.

Kevin Rudd is unlike any former Prime Minister of the modern age. He is a bureaucrat looking to ‘run’ Australia. He wants to be the ultimate controller of power, people and information.

Dennis Shanahan recounted a story in The Australian recently explaining how Kevin Rudd in a meeting with the Premier of South Australia on rail funding demanded a map of Adelaide to plot where the additional rail route would be situated. 

Don’t we have experts to plan rail lines? Is that what we want our Prime Minister to be spending his time on?

Equally, last week the Prime Minister delivered a speech to the Business Council about planning control in our major capital cities. We already have buildings full of town planners, landscape designers and urban developers – but Kevin Rudd thinks they could use his help.

In the area of health we are seeing a new proposal every week to intrude on Australians lives under the guise of “preventative health”.  According to the Health Minister, Australians eat, drink and (some) smoke far too much costing our health budget gazillions more than need be.

So Kevin Rudd and Nicola Roxon have a plan.  They will ban or restrict or worse still tax what they don’t like into submission.

Rather than spending the money educating Australians about health choices the Rudd approach is to socially engineer through legislation.

They will ban junk food advertising, restrict tobacco companies from labelling products and hit alcohol with new taxes all under the guise of ‘preventative health’.

Do we really need the Government engineering what we eat and drink? What’s next a minimum sleep requirement?

Kevin doesn’t like kids watching too much TV, so he has plans to restrict that as well.  Don’t worry about taking too much responsibility for your own family, Kevin’s guide to parenting will be law soon enough.

Even the internet faces the looming threat of Rudd’s social engineering. He’s introducing a new censorship system designed to prevent you from viewing what he considers to be “inappropriate” content.

Don’t worry about yourself; Kevin is here to micromanage what you see online. And don’t just take my word for it: the system is so bad that his unofficial marketing division GetUp have advertised against it.

Kevin Rudd’s also worried about what you might read in the post. The Prime Minister has changed the rules for Parliament forcing MPs to clear everything they send by mail to their constituents to ensure it does not criticise the government. 

If I tried to send this column to my constituents in the mail, the Government would black out anything that attacked Kevin Rudd or the Government in general.  Thank God for the (pre-Rudd censored) Internet.

So far words like “mismanage” and “debacle” have been removed by the government censors from opposition letters.  This is an unprecedented level of micromanagement meets censorship.

This is who Kevin Rudd is and this is what he believes in.  He said it all in the opening line of his maiden speech in Parliament – “politics is about power”.

Kevin Rudd, bureaucrat-in-chief of Ruddstralia. 

Hope you enjoy your stay.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

53 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • persephone says:

      06:14am | 05/11/09

      Oh, don’t be so precious, Jamie.
      Firstly, that rock of certainty you refer to, JWH: said he would never introduce a GST, then did; said he would not tighten gun laws, then did; said he would impose tighter Ministerial standards, then didn’t; said he would run a small spending government then didn’t….etc etc.
      His stand on principle always seemed to be that if you didn’t like the ones he had on display, he had others.
      Rudd on the other hand is consistent. He has largely tried to do exactly what he said he would do.
      And there is no inherent contradiction between saying you’re an economic conservative and opposing the GST, accepting (because the Howard government told you) that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction but suggesting that there may be other methods to deal with that than war, or being humane towards asylum seekers but tough on people smugglers.
      It’s also a bit rich to criticise the government for not spending on preventative health and education when your party is the one who’ve knocked back the budget for this program in the Senate.
      And incredibly hypocritical to criticise the government for trying to introduce a net censorship policy almost exactly the same as the one your party took to the last election.
      And you’re perfectly free to send anything you like to your constituents in the mail; it’s just that you can’t expect the taxpayer to foot the bill if what you write goes against the guidelines laid down by the previous government.

    • danj says:

      06:53am | 05/11/09

      Scary.

    • watty says:

      06:57am | 05/11/09

      Does the Rudd censorship of comment apply to transcripts of his rado/TV interviews which are freely available?

      Does that mean he will actully answer questions without blaming Howard,Turnbull,Hockey,Abbott, the “previous Government” and the big bogeyman “the Coalition”

      He was a nerdy nasty piece of goods when working for Goss and things have only gone down hill since then.

    • Will says:

      07:03am | 05/11/09

      Jamie Briggs seeks to dress up the perfectly sensible examination of his postal allowances as an attack on free speech. I am far more concerned that he thinks I should pay for his postage to promulgate his political message, rather than inform his electorate about his activities. Sorry, Briggs, but you’re exposing yourself as another trough-groveller here.

    • Wayne H says:

      07:03am | 05/11/09

      Not a real issue in my opinion as I don’t think he will be around too much longer. The people are awakening from their slumber…  2 years ago I thought wow, this sounds great. A man from the people for the people. Great ideas ambition and drive to get things done! Spin spin and more spin. Done nothing but blow the budget. Roll on election time.

    • P.Gibbons says:

      07:04am | 05/11/09

      Oh, so true. Although I prefer to call Australia Ruddistan, considering the current boat people problem.

      Has anyone ever watched him during ‘question time’, he act’s like a 4 year old. He completely avoids answering the question by attacking particular members of the opposition, What’s more, he refuses to provide the opposition briefings or documentation of particular incidents. What does this do - simple, the opposition can not question what they do not know! People might say it or consider it, but Keviee is a Communist, in form and fact.

    • Paul says:

      07:09am | 05/11/09

      Jamie, after all the Howard years you want to tell us YOU will fight for our democracy? Where did you suddenly get the track record or credibility to claim this? Leave GetUp alone they listen to ordinary Aussies more than the Liberals do and they were campaigning on these issues long before you got off your lazy bum.

    • AJ says:

      07:32am | 05/11/09

      This is becoming a tiresome and inaccurate refrain.

      There is no restriction on you sending anything you want to your constituents, provided you use Party funds to send it.  Again, Mr Briggs, if you’re too lazy/incompetent/unpopular to be able to raise enough money to do a mailout, please don’t ask to put your snout in the public trough.

    • Pete from Sydney says:

      07:36am | 05/11/09

      Watty, you don’t reckon the Rodent blamed the labour government before him   for just about every ill known to mankind for most of his term in office? 

      get fair dinkum son…

    • iansand says:

      07:54am | 05/11/09

      The level of squealing about ensuring that postal allowances are used for their intended purpose makes me 100% certain that they have been mightily abused in the past.  By all sides.

    • Kazza says:

      07:54am | 05/11/09

      He may still win the next election but I think he will be surprised how many Aussies are wising up to him and his own ambitions for himself. The man is an arrogant, egomaniac, the sooner he is back in the wilderness the better.

    • Dani says:

      08:15am | 05/11/09

      Sure wouldnt read this anywhere but the internet because it’s boring, rehashed pap. Jamie, how about writing your own stuff rather than rewording the work of other columnists? Be new, be different - then I might listen to what you have to say.

    • Zeta says:

      08:18am | 05/11/09

      Go back to bed Australia your Government is in control. Do not adjust your channel. There is only Masterchef. Watch more Masterchef. Cate Blanchet will now lead your children in meditation before their 30 minutes of excercise. Sugar is the root of all evil. Sugar will kill your children. Children are the future of our nation. Build more schools. Build more school halls. Soon, all of Australia will be one, giant school and you will be the coolest kid in class because you don’t do drugs. Don’t smoke. Smoking might mean you have to go outside and miss Masterchef. The Internet is for schools, not for pornography. Pornography is evil and banned. Watch Masterchef instead. Learn to cook new recipes using fat free ingredients. Do not drink. Drinking means you might get drunk and miss Masterchef. Do not offend others. Do not make jokes about other people. All jokes must be submitted to the Department of Culture before dissemination. Australia’s safest jokes will be announced each night before Masterchef. Watch Masterchef.

    • Shady says:

      08:53am | 05/11/09

      You can still use your postal allowance for factual information.
      After a decade of the coalition ignoring the issue, I think some central control of infrastructure planning will be a good thing. Traveling by road or rail in our any of our major city’s is a nightmare and due to the lack of supply, the cost of housing has gone through the roof.
      Howard left the battlers battling!

    • Steve says:

      08:59am | 05/11/09

      “We already have buildings full of town planners, landscape designers and urban developers – but Kevin Rudd thinks they could use his help.”

      Have you lived in sydney? Have you seen the amateur developments? Have you used the public transport? Of course they need help!!

    • Bored Pensioner says:

      09:01am | 05/11/09

      Crickey. I never watch MASTERCHEF.
      I have no future it looks like.
      Anyone wanna buy a good 57” TV .Only watched religiously on Sundays, I’m buying some grog before we all die of boredom…
      Can I watch Keffin and hear him murdering words and sentences before I go?
      Better than watching Johnny TV I reckon. Those insane words he uses to say what most can say in fewer words. Its like a word puzzle.

    • Patrick says:

      09:07am | 05/11/09

      Why is it now acceptable for the Coalition to publish outright lies in the mainstream Australian press? From Bronwyn Bishop 2 days ago, to whathisname Back yesterday, to Jamie Briggs today, all barking on about Rudd imposing totalitarianism on Australia when nothing could be further from the truth.

      They are peddling this change to printing allowance laws on the back of ramblings from ridiculously partisan newspaper columnists (read Piers Ackerman) as though it is some sort of infringement on the right to criticize the government. It is not, it merely means taxpayer money cannot be used to print partisan political material for either the government or an opposition. This has always been the case under the previous government aswell, the changes in regulation merely make eforcement stricter.

      But when confronted with his *fact* they ignore it and continue to lie and keep spinning their line, as do their nitwit supporters. These are lies, these are lies that have been proven to be lies and whats more, those peddling them know them to be lies.

      Is it that the opposition is now so bereft of absolutely anything meaningfull to say that all they have left is to lie? And why is it that lies are now given free reign in the mainstream Australian media?

    • Fan says:

      09:21am | 05/11/09

      The part I don’t understand about rudd the micromanager is the management part. Has he had any good, sustainable outcomes from his management? The fact is Australia is no different than the US, I mean they voted George W Bush in twice, if Australians couldn’t see what a hopeless cause ruddy was 2 years ago (and still is) then what hope does this country have. Get ready to sell us off to china or something.

    • Russ says:

      09:30am | 05/11/09

      I could have got this column in the post, Jamie, just as I could have got Bronny Bishop’s similar rant or that other loser yesterday.  It’s just that you would have had to pay the postage.  But if you restricetd yourself to the facts, it would be paid for by the taxpayer.  I think you do very nicely by way of taxpayer-funded expenses, and face it, under Howard the postal allowance was very comprehensively rorted - even to the extent of most of it being saved for election time.  A very slight tap on your snout.

    • Paul says:

      09:45am | 05/11/09

      I thought if you disagreed with the Liberals you were an Orwellian nonperson or UnAustralian? (In Howards version of Political Correctness.) Libs despise dissent and debate too:  Can we vote Jamie Briggs off the Island?

    • JaneAgatha says:

      09:55am | 05/11/09

      Initially I was not impressed by Kevin Rudd’s personal presentation in the media. Since he became Prime Minister I’ve been incredibly impressed, by his intelligence, courage, sincerity and moral sense. I feel he has a high level understanding of the policy responses needed to keep this country on track and hopefully make it a better place - far more so than most Australians. The economic stimulus is a prime example. Urban planning is a key issue for the future. Given how damn smart Rudd is I’m sure he could usefully contribute whatever area of government he sort to micromanage. His public sector background has been a good preparation for this. His high level knowledge of Chinese language and culture won’t do Australia any harm in the current global climate

    • Jane Greene says:

      10:11am | 05/11/09

      JaneAgatha- well and truely sucked in by the spin! Hook, Line and Sinker!

    • watty says:

      10:15am | 05/11/09

      Pete from Sydney I believe the “Rodent” left Rudd and Swan about $20 billion which they blew in a few months.

      All Rudd is going to leave is debt,debt and even more debt.

      Just one question.Why would the so called “Rodent” blame a non existant Australian political Party?

      I believe the LABOUR Party is still stuffing up in the U.K.?

      Next question smart***???

    • Haggis says:

      10:16am | 05/11/09

      Oh dear, more “rants”, “ramblings” and a couple of “snouts”.  Sounds like some folks are on a message again . . . .Tres objectif

    • David says:

      10:21am | 05/11/09

      Only thing I think KRudd feels is himself.

      A poster-boy for Narcissists everywhere.

      Can’t turn back the clock and we’re far from doomed, but history will reveal Rudd’s true personality.

    • watty says:

      10:24am | 05/11/09

      Help me. Am I being told that all the info coming uncensored from the Government is being paid for with Party rather than taxpayers funds.

      As for accuracy I quote just one slightly frayed but oft repeated phrase.

      “THE SCIENCE IS ALL IN”

      Just who is going to censor Rudd/Wong and the other experts who keep mis-informing us about"Global Warming” in print sound and video?

      That’s OK if the Party pays for it I presume.?

    • Patrick says:

      10:48am | 05/11/09

      watty.

      Do you support the use of taxpayer dollars going towards the printing of partisan political attacks on a politician’s opponents, governemnt or opposition,  or do you not?

      It’s pretty simple really.

    • H says:

      11:09am | 05/11/09

      Hi Jamie, please keep punching.

      About the Prime Minister’s “contradiction” on Iraq mentioned in your article. I actually think in believing that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but questioning the motivation - Kevin was right in tune with most Aussies.

      We mostly believed that there were WMD’s in Iraq, we simultaneously believed that wasn’t the real motivation for the invasion and saw it as a cynical and corrupt grab for oil.

      The coalition’s refusual to acknoweldge these concerns was an insult to the Australian electorate and one of the reasons it hardened against you from then on. Your colleagues and predecessor publicly questioned why Australians had stopped listening to them in 2007. May I suggest it has something to do with the fact your party stopped listening to us very publicly over Iraq.

      Since then your party has been burdened with a perception you have very little respect for the electorate….a perception increased by the hard liners in your party (Minchin saying workchoices didn’t go far enough, Tuckey saying the ETS is stupid)) being so out of touch.

      Perhaps before you look at Rudd you could look at what makes your party electable? I suggest one thing is you start listening.

    • Paul says:

      11:53am | 05/11/09

      Jamie,

      When is your party going to start talking about your ideas, rather than other peoples?

      It would be great if you could play-the-ball, rather than play-the-man.

      These rants do get a bit tiring.

    • JaneAgatha says:

      11:55am | 05/11/09

      I don’t mind Jamie’s punching and happy to join the fray. There’s a lot more behind these issues than mere spin or “contradiction”.

      I’ve just been reading a 1971 paper by prominent political scientist and theorist, Ronald Inglehart, and this stood out as relevant:
      ‘in politics it is sometimes impossible to maximise one good without detriment to another. In such cases, the relative priority among valued objectives becomes a vital consideration’

      I feel this is what Rudd has been doing and in so doing shows far more political perspicacity than Jamie’s glib piece implies. Jamie’s is a superficial journalistic appraisal apparently motivated by a desire to find fault and point the finger. No doubt some gullible voters will be taken in.

      The world is full of contradictions and ambiguities and within this context wise and decisive action (i.e. leadership) as opposed to helpless passivity requires just such a highly developed moral sense as Rudd has displayed.

    • Muzz says:

      12:18pm | 05/11/09

      Labor have not been able to form Government for 11 years, YES thats right 11 years! and they still can’t! Where were they before the last election? In the wilderness where they belong, and where they shall return!

    • Paul says:

      12:32pm | 05/11/09

      @janeagatha 1255 what was the point of all that management-speak exactly? You are missing the fundamentalist detrimentalism* of Jamie joining the conga line of Liberal hypocrites (3 this week) attempting to brainwash us with the same press release and making a mountain out of postage stamps. Stop. Now. Please.

    • Vince Predine says:

      12:56pm | 05/11/09

      Paul - we’ve had 2 years of Rudd/Labor and their media friends trying to brainwash us, so I say to Jamie keep it up mate! well done! you too Brony! Totally sick of hearing and reading nothing but praise and admiration crap hailed upon the messiah Kevin. It helps to put some balance back into the equation! GREAT STUFF JAMIE! Look forward to reading more of your articles in the future.

    • Allan says:

      01:18pm | 05/11/09

      John Howard at least recognised that States existed and had rights and responsibilities under our current constitution.
      I know it will be a shock to most Labor supporters but Howard defended state rights and Federalism.
      Unfortunately most of the State Leaders and Govts have been Labor and have been proven to be incompetent.
      Rudd conned the Premiers and Chief Ministers into a very traditional Labor “go slow” campaign so that Howard would be obstructed in his last term by state/ federal issues.
      Now Rudd is moving in on the States with their ineffective leadership to cast Australia in his vision.
      Go on Labor supporters, tell us how good Rees, Bligh, Stanhope and Rann are.
      The only State Labor Leader with any bottle is Brumby and he doesn’t care what the rest of Australia thinks.
      Just look at the way he is ripping water out of the Murray-Darling basin to water Melbourne and by that action stymying any improvement in water allocation between the States.
      On reflection Brumby is just like Rudd, doing his own thing and bugger the rest.

    • watty says:

      01:19pm | 05/11/09

      Good question Patrick and the answer is pretty simple.

      As long as the same rules apply to all Government,
      Coalition,Greens and Independents publications
      fliers,transcripts,YouTubes etc,etc.

      But if it is only a gag to stop criticism of Government I wouldn’t support it no matter who is in power.

    • watty says:

      01:27pm | 05/11/09

      Hey Paull….remember the No 1 brainwasher of the century repeated by Rudd ,Wong and now Pastor Gore

                  ” THE SCIENCE IS ALL IN”

      A very deliberate lie as even a nerdy Pubic Servant like Rudd realises that “ALL THE SCIENCE ” is never in..

    • Liz says:

      01:52pm | 05/11/09

      And if he didn’t run the country as PM you’d criticise that? Give him ago, he can’t do worse than the last one!

    • Patrick says:

      02:01pm | 05/11/09

      Watty

      “As long as the same rules apply to all Government,
      Coalition,Greens and Independents publications
      fliers,transcripts,YouTubes etc,etc “

      Well that’s interesting, because thats exactly what the changes to the regulation does. All MP’s are currently given taxpayer funded printing allowances for them to distribute pamphlets to those in their electorate. What MP’s cannot do with this allowance, and this has always been the case, even under Howard, is use this material for partisan political attacks on their opponents. The changes being made simply enforce this rule and eliminate the loopholes that have been used over the years to rort this taxpayer funded privelege.

      “But if it is only a gag to stop criticism of Government I wouldn’t support it no matter who is in power.”

      If you get your information about what goes on in Canberra from Piers Ackerman, Andrew bolt or the rest of those intellectually dishonest trollumnists then I can forgive you for thinking that was the case, and you would be right to oppose such a thing. As such, this is not the case.

      Nobody anywhere ever has suggested anything remotely along the lines of preventing people from criticizing the government. If the Coalition or the Labor party want to flood their electorates with thousands of propaganda leaflets, they may do so, but they must use their own parties finances to do so, not taxpayer money.

      Not to say Labor doesn’t do the same when it suits them, but on this issue, you are being lied to by the Coalition and that twit Ackerman who are trying to scare you with fanciful tales of totalitarianist government, and you are playing right into their hands.

    • Anna says:

      02:04pm | 05/11/09

      Your too funny Liz, he already has done worse than the last one. If you can’t see that now, you will before too long.

    • Shady says:

      02:16pm | 05/11/09

      What a whiner!
      If the Liberal party ever want to be back in government they will need to move past the Howard tactic of trying to fool the electorate with half truths and misrepresentations. Voters will only tolerate that when the economy is booming, not during an economic slow down. It’s time to start talking about issues that effect the long term future of the country, instead of the short term future of the Liberal party.
      Doe’s the Liberal Party have any policies’?
      I can’t think of one.

    • Emily's Nephew says:

      02:21pm | 05/11/09

      I’m interested that this opposition member wants to communicate with his constituents.  I live in Ms Markus’s electorate.  When she was a member of the government she was issuing newsletters and personalised mail v. regularly.  Since the election, nothing!  I wonder what she plans to do with her postal allowance.  Her electorate is marginal, but she doesn’t seem to care about her voters (or potential ones).

    • Henry says:

      02:36pm | 05/11/09

      Shady before your start critisising the Libs about policy you must remember, as someone else pointed out, Labor haven’t had a policy or a credible Leader for 11 years.  Also any policy this Government claims to have is only that of those opposite, with a little tinkering here and there.

    • Cam says:

      02:39pm | 05/11/09

      This is what the left is all about - big government controlling every little aspect of it’s peoples’ lives. I’m surprised young people feel the party(ies) who represent their views the best are the same ones who want to tell them exactly how to live their lives. I would’ve thought young people are far more receptive to messages of freedom, initiative, free markets and small government? Where are the Libs going wrong with that message?

    • shady says:

      02:43pm | 05/11/09

      That’s right Watty,
      all the science is not in, although it is heavily slanted in favor of in favor of man made climate change, about 90% to 10%.
      This compares with the predictions championed by the Liberals and Nats that the ETS will have a negative affect on the economy, which is only has about 50% support from economists. There not so skeptical about that one.
      Stinks of ulterior motives.

    • Fergus says:

      03:10pm | 05/11/09

      I think some people are forgetting a teensy-weensy little piece of legislation Howard wanted to put in. They were the sedition laws. They heavily restricted all freedom of speech, with severe punishments.

      Suck it up Briggs, legislation restricting drinking and bad eating is actually good for the country and the world. How do people not see that??? Left to our own devices, a disturbingly large amount of Australians are now obese and many are alcoholics.

      But no, big bad Kevin is now trying to stop that. What an evil man!

    • Patrick says:

      03:26pm | 05/11/09

      Cam, I think you are confusing the Coalition with Liberterianism. Turnbull is a Liberterian, but the rest of his party isn’t, they are social conservatives, intent on imposing their own religious morality over practicality on the rest of us.

      The Coalition stands for market “freedom”, not personal freedom.

      Tell me, whose government was it that imposed the GST tax on this country? Whose government was it that introduced firearms restrictions? Whose government was it that restricted the availability of abortion drugs based on the health ministers own religious views over genuine medical concerns? Whose government was it that refused to recognize same sex couples as equals under the law based on religious dogma, (something that has now been rectified by the current government)?

      I have no idea why you seem think the Coalition stands for or ever stood for personal freedoms.

    • watty says:

      04:16pm | 05/11/09

      shady…both the Liberal and Country Parties have policies.

      Those policies are not worth diddly with Labor in power so don’t pull the Rudd stunt when bereft of ananswer ...blame the Coalition.The Emperor has been in power for nearly two years and I vividly remember his famous wordfs"THE BUCK STOPS WITH ME” (except if a few things go a*** up)

    • Chris O'Regan says:

      04:36pm | 05/11/09

      “Kevin Rudd is unlike any former Prime Minister of the modern age. He is a bureaucrat looking to ‘run’ Australia. He wants to be the ultimate controller of power, people and information.”

      Why on earth could this fanciful assertion not be said about John Howard?

    • DJG says:

      04:38pm | 05/11/09

      When i read Jaime’s work i feel good. If he is what passes for talent in the Liberal Party they will be in opposition a very long time.

    • watty says:

      04:43pm | 05/11/09

      Patrick you are a presumptious pillock.

      Having spent more than 30 years dealing with Gov ernments
      Oppositions and their Departmentsfrom McMahon to Howard and haunting the corridors of power for days on end at both the Old and New Parliaments I don’t take my advice from Akerman or that old Labor minder Bolt.Just the same as I don’t take the advice of the intellectually honest Grattan or Oakes..

      The present Government is flooding the market from Primary Schools to Stare and Local Governments with blatant propaganda about “Global Warming” sorry ‘Climate Change’.

      And that is at taxpayer’s expense not Labor Party.

    • persephone says:

      07:07pm | 05/11/09

      Watty - the government is flooding schools with propaganda about climate change at taxpayers’ expense?

      Please provide evidence.

      I’m heavily involved in both my kids’ schools and I don’t think I’ve seen anything from the government in either of them on climate change.

    • Jake Fajzullin says:

      08:15pm | 05/11/09

      How will Rudd efficiently regulate how much TV children watch.  I know! We could invent TV’s that monitor you whilst you watch them.  We could call them something creative, like say… “The Telescreen”?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Square kilometer array? Exactly http://t.co/GOte9QFy

tory_maguire

@pryorlisa I had exactly the same feeling when I bought the Women's Weekly the other day. I think it's demographic creep!

Paul Colgan

@ClaireRConnelly hops into CSIRO and the government for the total non-campaign for the square kilometer array http://t.co/GOte9QFy

Malcolm Farr

RT @mumbletwits: +1 MT @meadea Adding voice to the boss RT @abcmarkscott: Hereby instruct @Colvinius to make a swift return to good health. (Take care Mark.)

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter