Jeff Greenfield, CBS News Senior Political Correspondent once quipped that more things in politics happen by accident or exhaustion than happen by conspiracy.

Not about finding Moon water at all

Inarguably his four decades of experience - which includes time as a speechwriter for Robert F. Kennedy - enable him to make such informed statements, but as the son of a politician I will venture that if it wasn’t for John Della Bosca’s sex antics and the occasional fantastically implausible conspiracy theory, politics would be as boring as bat guano.

Conspiracy theories have been a popular part of Western politics since 10.15pm on April 14, 1865 when John Wilkes Booth walked into Ford’s Theatre and assassinated Abraham Lincoln. Immediately after Lincoln’s assassination questions arose. Was Booth solely responsible or was he someone’s hired gun, and if so, whose?

But whereas explanations for Lincoln’s untimely demise were almost elegant in their simplicity (e.g. Vice President Johnson was behind it, it was a plot by the Confederates, a cabal of international bankers, or the Catholic Church), nowadays conspiracy theories are becoming more complex and obscure (not to mention entertaining) by the minute.

A significant factor driving this new generation of Jerry Bruckheimer-esque conspiracy theories is that up until the mid 80s it was much easier to take pot shots at politicians. Fact is, all yesterday’s budding theorist had to do to gain public attention was create a compelling story alleging the “real” method and motivation for a politician’s death (hence the Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X assassinations were all at some point attributed to popular Manchurian Candidate-style plots). But today, thanks in part to increased security, political leaders aren’t being shot as often, so zealous conspiracy theorists have had to shift their focus and begin crafting incredibly specific yet convoluted stories that allegedly “shed light” on clandestine activity just to get attention.

It was one of this new generation of conspiracy theorists that unexpectedly caught (and held) my attention at dinner earlier this week. For what previous generations of stereotypical truth-spinners had lacked, the new theorists seem to have in spades. Mr. X (I shall protect his identity) was a well kempt, well spoken, professional raconteur who convincingly intertwined fact with fiction to the point that he had half of the table nodding in agreement with his tale before we knew it. For had I not been seated beside Mr. X, I may well have gone to my grave without knowing the truth behind Bill Clinton’s career success and Barrack Obama’s controversial laureate win.

The Clinton Body Count conspiracy theory was recounted to us by Mr. X with just the right amount of casual confidence and condescension to convince us all that we were fools for not having known this before, and we would be even more foolish to openly question a story presented so truthfully. We sat in stunned silence and listened to how Bill Clinton during his time as president had quietly assassinated anyone who got in the way of his career, leading to a total body count of between 50-60 people. Mr X spoke convincingly on how each death was carefully constructed to look like natural causes or an accident so as now to arouse suspicion, and he named names (e.g. Vince Foster) with such honesty that by the end of the story I had recounted my obviously uninformed allegiance to Big Willy (Please note: my respect for you has now returned former president Clinton, so please don’t have me whacked!).

The, when a colleague seated across the table cockily commented that this kind of thing would never happen with president Obama at the helm, Mr. X wasted no time in proving just how inferior our intellects were by revealing the story behind Obama’s laureate win. What follows is a summary of Mr. X’s remarkably detailed explanation for Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize win, that I have subtly titled the Obama Bombing a Moon Again (O.B.A.M.A.) theory, linking NASA’s recent LCROSS mission to a closed down lunar monitoring facility and Star Wars research lab at Area 41, then across the ocean to Norway and back to the Oval Office with such intricate detail and deftness that I almost didn’t sleep that night for fear of my imminent death.

Here’s how the facts play out…

1. NASA’s $600m LCROSS Mission came to an end early Saturday morning when they successful crashed a 2 tonne Centaur missile into the surface of the Moon.

2. The “publicly stated” objective of the 113 day LCROSS mission was to locate traces of water on the permanently dark southern side of the Moon.

3. Locating a water source on the Moon would be a crucial first step towards NASA achieving George W. Bush’s challenge of returning man there by 2020.

4. The Centaur missile struck the lunar surface at 4000 miles per hour, generating a massive plume of debris that a trailing satellite flew through to measure for traces of water vapour.

5. NASA claims the impact would not affect the Moon’s rotation or destabilize it in any way, claiming that the speed was necessary to raise a debris cloud high enough off the lunar surface for the second satellite to fly through.

6. Back on earth, a “reliable source” claimed that the sole Lunar Monitoring facility was officially decommissioned just before the LCROSS Mission launched.

7. The Lunar Monitoring facility, requiring only $150,000 in funding, utilises an array of sophisticated lasers aimed at mirrors on the lunar surface (placed there by Apollo astronauts) to measure planetary spin etc.

8. The “reliable source” questioned NASA’s certainty that their “bombing” of the Moon would have no impact on its rotation or stability, asking why then would they cease funding such a paltry sum for the Lunar Monitoring facility just days before the LCROSS Mission started.

9. The reliable source has claimed that the reason the facility was closed was because the entire LCROSS Mission was a cover up for a Star Wars weapons program test fire of a nuclear weapon on the lunar surface, a test which would definitely shift the Moon’s alignment, and which would be noticed by the Lunar Monitoring facility.

10. Further, the reliable source claims that the LCROSS / Star Wars mission was a strategic exercise designed to showcase the US’s might to “Santa Claus”.

11. Well informed conspiracy theorists know that “Santa Claus” is the codename Apollo astronauts gave to alien space craft sightings, most of which were situated around the Moon’s southern pole.

12. The implied suggestion is that NASA accurately targeting and “bombing” the Lunar South Pole was their way of “firing a shot across the bow” to warn any extraterrestrial life forms that the US has the capacity to accurately target the Moon with weapons if need be.

13. As such, if the LCROSS Mission was in fact a weapons test then it is a blatant breach of the Outer Space Treaty which prohibits the Moon being used for weapons test or acts of war. Breaches of this magnitude could mean presidential impeachment.

14. Evidence that this was a conspiracy long in the planning; Obama’s nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize was submitted 11 days after he commenced office and the funding to the Lunar Monitoring facility was axed 10 months prior to the LCROSS Mission officially being publicised.

15. Meaning that the five-person Nobel committees decision to award president Obama the Nobel Peace Prize (ironically for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples”) was nothing more that a carefully planned ruse designed to bolster president Obama’s popularity, distracting the planets and media’s attention away from his act of war against our lunar neighbours simply to protect his job.

So irrespective of wether you believe we landed on the Moon in the 60s, that aliens may or may not exist, or that the lunar “bombing” was really about finding water or for a hidden agenda, TWO FACTS ARE CLEAR; Obama hasn’t had his job long enough to have a real impact worthy of the laureate, and UFO’s appeared above Russia days after the lunar “bombing”.

Coincidence? I think not.

Now you know.

P.S. On a positive note, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Mr Obama would give the laureate prize money to charity.

11 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • I see the truth and the rest of you are being fool says:

      08:12am | 16/10/09

      The part you left out is that Obama IS an alien, and a criminal alien at that, one that can aparently shapeshift. He fled his home planet of Rigel 7 after committing war atrocities and came here to Earth to hide.

      Eventually the Rigel 7 authorities discovered his hiding place and where on the way to arrest him, so “Obama” decided he had to defend himself by getting himself elected to the top office of the worlds foremost military power.

      He ordered this “shot across the bow” weapons testing to show to the Rigelians that if they tried to come to Earth to extradite him, he would wipe out their colonies on the dark side of the moon. He is also mind controlling the Nobel commitee with his telepathic powers.

      But “Obama” is not planning to use the US to merely defend himself, oh no. First, he will “unite” the world under a pretext of peace and co-operation, economically and socially, and within years he will us the US military to launch us unwitting humans into an intergalactic war in an attempt to reconquer Rigel 7 and after that the rest of the galaxy. He has deliberatly kicked up health care debate to distract from the massive military build up going on behind the scenes in the US.

      Obama is an alien and will lead us into a devastating intergalactic war. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!1

    • Tim says:

      08:26am | 16/10/09

      @I see the truth,
      So you mean Obama wasn’t really born in Kenya?
      You learn something new everyday.

    • I see the truth says:

      08:36am | 16/10/09

      Exactly Tim. The “birthers” are on the right track but not about the place of birth. Not only was he not born in the United States, he wasn’t even born ON THIS PLANET!!1!

    • Extrat says:

      09:34am | 16/10/09

      Hmmm!! Back to the moon for a minute wouldn’t ‘bombing’ the moon look a bit like pissing in the wind to aliens?

    • hoofman says:

      09:39am | 16/10/09

      So GWB had a plan to ‘return man to the moon by 2020’?  How did he sell that to the fanatics on the fringe of his party who thought the 1969 landing was a huge conspiratorial fraud?

    • Jugger says:

      10:45am | 16/10/09

      Wow, that dude sounds waco, just like the climate change conspiracy theorists.

    • Jugger says:

      10:51am | 16/10/09

      But seriously, these conspiracy wacos have become more proliferate because of the internet.

      Whereas, in the past your average conspiracy theory loony would only have an audience limited to his social circle, nowadays they have the whole world at their disposal thanks to the www.  It makes it easier for them to find like minded wacos.

      This is how the anti climate change conspiracy is spread there hatred.  These wacos use cherry picked ‘facts’ and scientific sounding falsities to spread their ludicrous theories.

    • I see the truth says:

      11:03am | 16/10/09

      Climate change IS also a conspiracy Jugger. It was invented by Margaret Thatcher as a pretext to break up union power on coal mines and steels mills in northern England. The evidence is there but all you people are falling for the tricks of the Lefties, themselves being manipulated by the great alien in Washington, who has recycled Thatchers original lie as a means of uniting the world around himself so he can later conscript us to fight for him in his inter planetary space army.

      I also think Hoofman may be onto something here. Does anybody else find it interesting that we have never ever seen George Bush and Barack Obama in the same place at the same time together? Sure there are videos and photos of this, but these things are easily docotred. It is also interesting that Bush was absent for much of McCains 2008 election campaign. Why was he not out there campaigning for his fellow Republican? Could it be that he was too busy out and about CAMPAIGNING AS OBAMA????!!

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:09am | 16/10/09

      Does anyone else find it suspicious that NASA lost the original moon tapes?

      I mean, it’s not like losing your wedding photos is it?

    • Glenn says:

      12:07pm | 16/10/09

      This article was actually an interesting read because people could find this easy to beleive, its frightening to think that people are so easily manipulated.

    • Corkie says:

      02:43am | 19/10/09

      “One small step for man, one giant step for paronia”.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @mumbletwits: +1 MT @meadea Adding voice to the boss RT @abcmarkscott: Hereby instruct @Colvinius to make a swift return to good health. (Take care Mark.)

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter