198 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • iansand says:

      12:28pm | 25/03/10

      News and current affairs uncomplicated by commercial and ideological imperatives.

      Innovative, interesting Australian content.

    • Mark says:

      12:59pm | 25/03/10

      Surely since everyone has an ideology, conscious or not, that colours everything they do or say, that is next to impossible…?

    • Ross says:

      01:57pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC used to be a reliable source of news and commentary.  It has always been left leaning however.  I would like the ABC to at least try to be even handed.  I used to be an addict to the 7.30 report. When it was at State Level I got put off because in WA Alan Carpenter was so biased ALP it was an open embarrassment.  When it was NAtional we were treated to more of the same with Kerry O’Brien.  He has to be the most worn out hack on TV - get rid of him and put some young and inquiring blood into news and current affairs like you used to have.  If we want Dorothy Dixer interviews we’ll read the AGE

    • Peter Link says:

      02:06pm | 25/03/10

      Innovative, interesting Australian content - What a load of rubbish.

    • Dazza says:

      02:14pm | 25/03/10

      Ummm, why are we always having these navel gazing episodes at the the ABC. Why don’t we whinge on about how right wing the Commercial channels are. There are three right wing commercial channels and one (perceived) left wing ABC. 3 to 1 ratio. Leave the ABC alone you right wingers. You’ve got your way with the Commercial channels. And before you go on about that its your money being spent on the ABC through taxes. My money goes to the Armed Forces through my taxes and i don’t agree with that. What you going to do, agree with me that we should dismantle the armed forces?.

    • Seano says:

      02:36pm | 25/03/10

      I don’t agree that the ABC is particularly left leaning.

      But I do think it is precious the number of conservatives who aren’t happy with ABC’s preceived bias when many would identify ring wing bias in the majority of commerical news programs, particularly Fox news.

    • John Sorensen says:

      02:46pm | 25/03/10

      Close it down.

    • papachango says:

      02:53pm | 25/03/10

      Dazza - how are the commercial channels right-wing? I don’t see much polical bias in ‘law and order’ or ‘Survivor episode 9: Kazakhstan’.

      Even what passes for ‘current affairs’ is hardly politically biassed, just sensationalist. I suppose you could call a Today Tonight segment on dole bludgers rightwing, but then their segments on the supermarkets ripping us off are leftwing.

      When was the last time Mel and Kochie or Tracey Grimshaw took Kevin Rudd to task over his wasterful spending the way Kerry O’Brien or Tony Jones attack anyone from the Libs?

      Anyway the commercial channels are not publicly funded (apart from Conroy’s handouts), so if they wanted to they could lean to whatever sides they liked. The ABC is publicly funded so should reflect the diversity of political views in Australia instead of being the far-left collective that it actually is.

    • Clem says:

      12:24pm | 25/03/10

      The same things it’s now spending its money on. The ABC rules FTA TV. May pay TV continue to writhe in its own excrement.

    • Patrick says:

      12:50pm | 25/03/10

      Exactly!. Leave the ABC alone

    • Sean says:

      01:09pm | 25/03/10

      I agree! Those that watch it, love it.

    • ABCmeh says:

      01:25pm | 25/03/10

      Sean: those that watch it and love it should pay for it by either accepting advertising on the channel or subscribing to it. Those that don’t watch it and don’t love it shouldn’t be forced to pay for other people’s viewing preferences. A simple principle that applies almost everywhere else when it comes to making a choice about what to consume. I can’t see why the ABC is exceptional in this regard.

    • Pinball says:

      01:32pm | 25/03/10

      Clem is on the money. The ABC is the most innovative and progressive media broadcaster in Australia by a long shot. Excellent mix of programming. Certain programs I don’t like, but that’s fine cause I’m sure someone else does like them.

      And at ABCmeh maybe you should watch, listen, or read it sometime, it’s more than just the news, the 7:30 Report, and british police shows.

    • ABCmeh says:

      01:58pm | 25/03/10

      Pinball: how is that in any way a rational response to my argument? You like the ABC, I get it. The point is that many (actually, most) don’t, and they shouldn’t have to pay for your preferences; any more than you should have to pay for theirs. That’s the argument you failed to address, and the ABC’s output is completely immaterial to that point..

    • Dan says:

      02:12pm | 25/03/10

      Please ABCmeh! Those who watch it pay for it? How about those who dont have children paying for maternity leave for those who do? Those who work paying for those who dont to live? Double standards my friend! ABC is by far the most decent TV channel of TV atm, none of the commercial crap that is being aired by the other channels!

    • James1 says:

      02:26pm | 25/03/10

      Likewise, ABCmeh, why should my taxes go towards subsidising Australian farmers, industry, and business?  I do not run a farm, work in any subsidised industry, or run a business.

    • ABCmeh says:

      02:46pm | 25/03/10

      Dan: it is you who needs to “get a grip”. You do realise that it would only be a double standard on my part only if I had actually written that I supported taxpayer-funded maternity leave, which I didn’t. Please discuss what I wrote and not what you want me to have written.

      James1: I agree entirely. I don’t support corporate or rural subsidies under any circumstances (the Too Big To Fail concept leaves me cold).

    • Mark says:

      02:52pm | 25/03/10

      Oh to live in the diabolical little world populated by ABCmeh! Bring me my calculator and receipt book! “I don’t drive down this pothole ridden road that’s being refurbished, so my council rates for the month should drop. And I don’t attend that private school, so my taxes should be reduced in turn. But I do enjoy swimming at the local beach, so I’ll deign to contribute to the work of the relevant environmental authorities.” I thought the post was trying to tease out our opinions on whether Australians believes the ABC can perform a legitimate public service under the planned changes, and where we think the money should be spent, not whether individuals should only pay for what they personally consume. Surely this isn’t a debate on whether “there is no such thing as society”?

    • Nathan says:

      02:55pm | 25/03/10

      I don’t love it, and resent being forced to pay for it, under the threat of imprisonment (because that’s what happens when you don’t pay your taxes). I find it a great injustice that I work hard all day, and have the government step in and take some money off me to pay for Jennifer Byrne and her sleep-inducing book club. Oprah’s book club however, costs me nothing to NOT watch.

    • ABCmeh says:

      03:37pm | 25/03/10

      Mark: don’t you think it’s rather silly to legitimise an argument by responding to it (however crudely) BEFORE writing it off as irrelevant?

      Anyway, why don’t you try this on for size - the Australian taxpayers shouldn’t spend their money on the ABC. Following that happy occurrence, the ABC can spend its money on whatever it chooses.

    • Guido says:

      12:36pm | 25/03/10

      More Australian made drama.

    • SM says:

      01:03pm | 25/03/10

      More C grade actors pretending to be doctors or police officers

      Can’t wait

    • Nick says:

      02:38pm | 25/03/10

      With you Guido.  More shows like Answered by fire, Bastard Boys and Curtin.  Less Bed of Roses, East of Eden, The cut and Valentines Day.  Prodigal son stories, we get it!

    • Simon the Pieman says:

      04:18pm | 25/03/10

      No - it may unearth another Blue Heelers

    • The Watcher says:

      12:41pm | 25/03/10

      A new channel like fox news. Jeez most in this country have been made dumb like a bag of carrots because of the one sided left wing bias in ALL tv news.

    • Warren says:

      12:52pm | 25/03/10

      I guess your idea of balanced news coverage would be FOX News?

    • Luke T says:

      12:57pm | 25/03/10

      FOX news has to be the worst channel in the world.

    • sleemol says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      So… you’re calling Fox News viewers smart by comparison? Seriously?

    • Drew says:

      01:26pm | 25/03/10

      You mean Faux News, right? Or did you mean Fox Noise? The most bigoted channel in the USA and one of the most bigoted in the world? The Republican Party’s media front? That channel?

      No thanks, we already have News Ltd.

    • James1 says:

      01:35pm | 25/03/10

      I’ll keep that in mind next time someone on the ABC shouts down (or screams down, a la Glenn Beck) anyone who disagrees with them…  Until then, your comparison is rubbish.

    • Tom says:

      01:37pm | 25/03/10

      Shame Watcher. You’ve upset Warren, Luke T and Sleemol.

    • Miles says:

      01:42pm | 25/03/10

      You mean, you watch tv for ‘news’???

    • Infense says:

      02:13pm | 25/03/10

      Dumb like a bag of carrots? Bit harsh on the old carrot. Perhaps your problem Watcher is that you are looking to carrots, or for that matter Fox News, for intelligence.

    • Baz says:

      02:28pm | 25/03/10

      Commercial news is so dumbed down it is insulting.
      Apart from having the same news stories read to us 3 or 4 times a day by different news readers, the stories are generally fluff.
      The last thing we need is a dedicated news station feeding us worthless crap all day.

    • john says:

      07:35pm | 25/03/10

      Fox News is more intelligent than ABC.  Fox News challenged the global warming argument that possessed the ABC and eventually was proven correct when the global warming argument fell apart.  The ABC still continues to slavishly promote global warming and allows no discussion of the alternative position, even though the world has moved on.

    • Dan says:

      10:01pm | 25/03/10

      John, are you serious? ‘Fox News is more intelligent than ABC’? That has to be one of the funniest comments I’ve read in quite a while. Oh, and when did the global warming argument fall apart? The majority of the world’s scientists would disagree with that.

    • Island View says:

      12:43pm | 25/03/10

      Anything other than aping commercial media as it seems it is increasingly doing

    • Tonbridge Welles says:

      07:44am | 30/03/10

      Too right. Here’s my crack at an ABC schedule (pinched ffrom Kim Williams’ waste paper bin)
      7pm (START OF TRANSMISSION)
      Gardening Australia
      7:30pm
      Chamber music recital
      8pm
      Gardening Australia (repeat)
      8:30pm
      Piano recital
      9pm (CLOSE OF TRANSMISSION, VIEWERS OF ABC SHOULD BE IN BED BY NOW)

    • Chewy says:

      12:50pm | 25/03/10

      Some conservatism to balance out its current Left leaning propaganda.

    • Andrew says:

      01:18pm | 25/03/10

      Actually the ABC is about as center as they come. Which means they just piss both sides off. They proved it a couple of years ago when they gave the stats on which political parties ABC exec’s have joined. They where 20 labor, 19 lib… You don’t really get much more center of the line than that with 39 people.

    • Matt says:

      01:15pm | 25/03/10

      Really? People still believe in that left wing/right wing tripe?

      There is no political spectrum, both sides are out to serve their own interests.

      I find it hilarious that you think the ABC has a left wing bias, most probably because everything it reports on is the truth, if you want spin coverage, go watch Channel 10.

    • shevek says:

      02:23pm | 25/03/10

      I quite like ostensibly right wing shows Counterpoint. Credit to ABC management for supporting them

    • Joe says:

      02:43pm | 25/03/10

      Actually the claims the ABC leans towards the left are disproved by research done recently on the subject of media bias by ANU,  which shows that the Australian media are actually mostly unbiased, including the ABC.  The only favoritism shown by the ABC was actually towards the Liberals and the right, when it came to one particular issue.

      Read it for yourself here: http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/~aleigh/pdf/MediaSlant.pdf

    • Chewy says:

      03:03pm | 25/03/10

      Joe we all know those who conducted the research were friends of the ALP. Andrew Leigh is an advisor to the ALP for crying out loud.
      Friends of the ALP giving the ABC a clean bill of health, it would be funny if it were not so serious.

    • papachango says:

      03:08pm | 25/03/10

      @Andrew - the execs may be 50:50 but the journalists are all leftwing almost to a man. Check out which political parties they end up in.

      @Joe - ANU are even further to the left - that’s about the only explanation I can find for their conclusions.

    • Purple Shoes says:

      12:50pm | 25/03/10

      “A new channel like fox news. Jeez most in this country have been made dumb like a bag of carrots because of the one sided left wing bias in ALL tv news.”

      awesome sense of humour smile

    • Karl Marx says:

      12:53pm | 25/03/10

      “A new channel like fox news. Jeez most in this country have been made dumb like a bag of carrots because of the one sided left wing bias in ALL tv news.” - Yeah like that bolshy mob at Channel 9. Socialists the lot of them - especially that Packer. And don’t even get me started on Rupert Murdoch, the greatest exponent of left wing ideology the media has even seen.

    • Peter M says:

      12:56pm | 25/03/10

      Packer sold out in 1998. Even my bag of carrots knows that.  You’ve been watching the ABC haven’t you Karl?

    • Peter M says:

      01:45pm | 25/03/10

      Self correction *2008.

    • Peter M says:

      01:59pm | 25/03/10

      Evil, Jared & Drew. You guys should check out the internet. You can get TV and radio from all around the world. You can get a great variety of views and even do research to verify what you read.

    • papachango says:

      02:47pm | 25/03/10

      At least Murdoch permits left wing views to be heard in his media (Philip Adams, Jill Singer etc)

      More than i can say for the ABC

    • Jerry says:

      12:53pm | 25/03/10

      I’d rather watch the ABC and SBS than tabloid commercial TV whose version of the ‘world’ is an American one

    • bella starkey says:

      01:30pm | 25/03/10

      Recently i was watching SBS news with some young men. The were completely shocked at what had happened in the world that day, none of which was even alluded to by commercial news.

    • Madeleine says:

      04:26pm | 25/03/10

      I agree. The commerial channels ‘news’ programs are a disgrace.

    • Madeleine says:

      04:26pm | 25/03/10

      I agree. The commerial channels ‘news’ programs are a disgrace.

    • Peter M says:

      12:54pm | 25/03/10

      In a media rich environment there should be no need for a state funded broadcaster. The ABC should be abolished.

    • Dr Evil says:

      01:04pm | 25/03/10

      Agree. Now all we need is a ‘media rich environment’.

    • Jared says:

      01:06pm | 25/03/10

      Disagree - a media rich environment controlled by media companies means a media environment controlled by only one imperative - profit. That’s what companies are mandated to do - make money.  State funding of media ensures that forms of media and voices other than those dictated by commercial pressure and those that are profitable have some room, allbeit small. If Peter M was perhaps part of a group whose voices and opinions were infrequently heard, then perhaps he might think differently.

    • Drew says:

      01:31pm | 25/03/10

      I also fail to see anything remotely resembling “rich” in the current media.

      Anaemic, yes. Rich, no.

      Or maybe you meant “raking in the money” rich? As in, global media corporations? Yes, they indeed are rich…

    • Peter M says:

      02:08pm | 25/03/10

      Evil, Jared & Drew. You guys should check out the internet. You can get TV and radio from all around the world. You can get a great variety of views and even do research to verify what you read.

      (Note to Editor: I think you may have the same scripting error as news.com had - if you open more than one reply box any comment will be inserted into the first one opened)

    • Lefty says:

      12:55pm | 25/03/10

      I like its left wing angle…all other stations are right wing

    • papachango says:

      03:14pm | 25/03/10

      I disagree that other stations are rightwing - see my response to iansand above for reasons. We don’t have the equivalent of Fox News in Australia. The only genuine ‘right wing’ (or rather conservative) news is the opinions of a handful of newspaper columnists - Bolt, Ackerman, Albrechsen, Henderson, Terry McCrann, and that’s about it.

      But it’s good to hear a lefty finally concede that the ABC has a left-leaning slant, most of them hysterically deny it and try to claim it’s ‘balanced’.

    • Duncs says:

      12:51pm | 25/03/10

      Keep doing exactly what your doing, ABC2 in the morning.  The ABC is the only station now which actually requires an individual to think.

      Keep up the great work
      (A full time news channel would be great as well- but I hear that is coming up on ABC3)

    • Melissa says:

      01:47pm | 25/03/10

      ABC3 is a kid’s tv channel and I really think it should stay that way. Advertisement free children’s programming is such a blessing.

    • Paul says:

      12:57pm | 25/03/10

      More of what it curerntly does and more global news.

      Sorry to say but C9, News.com, C7 and so on do a very poor job of reporting the news. Somebody watching C9 News in Sydney for example would have no idea whatsoever of what is happening in Israel whatsoever and very little idea about what is happening in Iraq.

      I accept that there should be little government interferance when the market is working, but the market is not working. Ultinately we will end up with a very dim and isolated population

    • William says:

      02:01pm | 25/03/10

      We’ve already got a very dim and isolated population. Thanks to 30 years of leftwing educational policies.

    • James1 says:

      02:27pm | 25/03/10

      Speak for yourself, William.  According to the stats, we are still one of the best educated Western countries around.

    • Bob Marley says:

      12:58pm | 25/03/10

      What wasted money? I enjoy any channel that does not bend over backwards for Paris Hilton and other B-listed celebs (especially Aussie wannabes) who spend make headlines on 7,9 and 10

    • Louis McLennan says:

      12:59pm | 25/03/10

      I feel it needs to put more funds to supporting the ALP. I’m thinking add the 6:30 report and 8:30 report to the line up at night. Maybe give Kerry and Tony some money to run some compulsory classes for everyone at the ABC. Also perhaps another 2 or 3 guests of Tony’s choosing on Q and A. Maybe a bit of merch at the ABC shops. Also a warning if deceased Anglo-Australian’s might be shown or voices heard.

      New line (it starts now). Perhaps more programs promoting the Australian culture for kids. Rather than being over run by do-gooders. I think the ABC television is quite good. It has a good all-round mix.

      I’ve not listened to much ABC local radio as it’s only playing in the morning and car. I enjoy Saturday night country. The presenters all vary. I think it gives an alright representation of the of the listeners. However, there are times where one can’t help but wonder if some careful planning goes into the messages and callers put on.

      Maybe try and boost triple j coverage in rural area’s.

      I guess maybe try and save some money. I’m sure there is room to save money and maintain the same quality (it is government after all).

    • Jordan says:

      12:59pm | 25/03/10

      Love the ABC. Intelligent, informative, unbiased new reporting. Some really interesting doco’s. ABC, SBS and Ch 10 are the only TV channels presenting progressive programming in Australia. The ABCs advancements in digital content is outstanding. Ch 7 & 9 should be retitled “Women’s Weekly 7” and “New Idea 9”. They both churn out utter trash.

    • Peter says:

      12:59pm | 25/03/10

      Don’t we constatntly hear that our children watch too much TV?  Yet the new ABC channels are directed at kids!!

      Lets have more news but perhaps less editorialism.

    • Seano says:

      02:45pm | 25/03/10

      It’s not up to the ABC to be parents! Having the programming there provides a tool for good parents to use.

    • Andrew says:

      12:55pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC is not duplicating the work of the private sector; it is providing an essential alternative to the lowest-common-denominator, filthy-with-advertising, low-quality tripe the commercial sector prefers. On the advertising front alone, the ABC will always be at least one third better than any commercial channel, as “38 Minutes” proves.

    • tommo says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      The ALP woops i mean the ABC is a waste of money…

    • Katie says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC is doing a great job just as it is, good mix of news and entertainment and really good commentators.

    • Matt says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      The government should stop wasting tax-payer dollars on commercial advertising and use the ABC for this info instead.  I disagree with ABC’s need to be more intellectual than commercial stations - it should be more appealing mainstream Australia, rather than just targeting a minority of the population.

    • CK says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      They have the right idea, they just need more of it.  There are some awesome comedians and drama writers out there, they need to be given more chance, and the ABC is the best place for them.  The other channels can OD on cop shows and tacky sit coms, let the ABC do more of the intelligent and innovative stuff.

    • playa won says:

      01:01pm | 25/03/10

      less ‘delegates’ (aka freeloaders) at industry conferences such as aus doco convention, MIPCOMM, Cannes. Only 1 or 2 is required, not the usual 6-8. No Joke, Ive seen it myself…same goes for SBS while were at it.

    • Daniel says:

      12:57pm | 25/03/10

      Everything it is currently spending it on. ABC is ten leagues above anything the commercial stations foist upon the public.

    • Bill says:

      12:57pm | 25/03/10

      “In a media rich environment there should be no need for a state funded broadcaster. The ABC should be abolished.”

      Oh please.  It is the only free to air station that has any credibility whatsoever…and that is exactly why it was created and should remain.  “Free Press” should also incorporate freedom from agendas of media moguls too.

      We are rich indeed in other media as long as you consider drivel such as ACA as having any value at all.

    • Steve says:

      01:03pm | 25/03/10

      More CSI shows.. NOT!  Keep the ABC as is

    • Hugh says:

      12:58pm | 25/03/10

      Not much,

      Just on all political programs, balance of opinion.

      If you have 4 guests, 2 from either side of the spectrum, not continually stacked against the conservative.

      If you have a left leaning show, add in a right leaning show for balance.
      Have all interviewers have NO political agenda or leaning.
      This may be inherently difficult, but we expect the same of football umpires when they call a game.
      Have an interviewer not be allowed to interject with their own opinion.

      All very simple and basic stuff which is preached at the ABC - just needs a little more enforcement

    • Alex says:

      03:01pm | 25/03/10

      “balance” is everything that is wrong with journalism today.  Reporters long ago discovered they could avoid having to actually interpret or understand anything, by merely quoting two opposing points of view. 

      Never mind if one (or both!) is utterly wrong, just close with something like “but the reality lies somewhere in between..” and you’re done.

      Forget balance.  Forget bias.  Balance does not negate bias.  Bias does not negate truth.

      Report the truth.  That’s all.  People will watch, listen, read.

    • Mark says:

      01:04pm | 25/03/10

      A journalistic series highlighting environmental issues, but looking equally at the threats faced by specific environments and the positive steps being taken in others.

    • Adrian says:

      01:04pm | 25/03/10

      If it wasn’t for ABC or SBS who would 7, 9 and 10 get their ideas for good shows and technologies from?

    • steve says:

      01:26pm | 25/03/10

      america?

    • John Paladin says:

      01:05pm | 25/03/10

      I tend to think that the ABC does a pretty good job by and large, but could perhaps do better.
      One of the best shows on tv - Breaking Bad - was shown on ABC2 recently. I would love to see them pick up even more of the quality English language shows from around the world that aren’t picked up by the commercials because of possible niche appeal.
      I would also cut Sunday Arts as a waste of time and (admittedly relatively little) money but I guess since an important part of their mandate is to show stuff that appeals to a smaller market that the commercials won’t cater for I need to take the good with the not-so.

    • Patricia says:

      01:05pm | 25/03/10

      keep the format and build on it more! The kids channels are great.  The Uk content is also really good. Maybe a documentary style channel to complement whats already on and the news channel should keep to good qulaity professional journalism as we are used to with both local and international content/

    • Nick says:

      01:06pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC should setup a daily tabloid newspaper in each major Australian city. I hear it’s a profitable business.

    • Chris says:

      01:07pm | 25/03/10

      Keep on as you are.

      More funds to enable more local dramas should be made available, IMO.

      The same for growing Australian comedians.

      There is nothing on the commercial channels that appeals to anyone in my home.

    • Dave says:

      01:02pm | 25/03/10

      More Leigh Sales! More Leigh Sales! More Leigh Sales!

    • Mark says:

      01:08pm | 25/03/10

      1. Provision Kerry O’Brien with a variable current electrode set to fry party hacks who avoid the question (and no rubber soles allowed!).

      2. A worm.

      3. A cape for Peter Cundall smile

    • S says:

      01:08pm | 25/03/10

      Information is too important to be left in the hands of a failing business model, so let the ABC give us news, and stop bitching about how they’re so damn good at it no-one can compete. Then commercial TV can focus on what it does best ... works of art like the Matty Johns Show, and anything involving weight loss or instant celebrity (or ideally both).

    • Matis says:

      01:02pm | 25/03/10

      More well funded investigative journalism & documentaries.

      You will never find commercial stations working well in these areas – there is always some sponsor or bean counter to jerk their chains.

    • Dr Evil says:

      01:03pm | 25/03/10

      Anyone seen RT? Thats news I can get into. The ‘RT’ stands for ‘Russia Today’. They tell it like it is…

    • Zeta says:

      01:21pm | 25/03/10

      Coming up next on Russia Today - Jesse Ventura talks about the UFOs broadcasting directly into President Obama’s brain. Freemasons and Jews - in our schools, reading our children’s minds. President Putin takes his shirt off, and a slide show of dismembered Iraqi insurgents. After the weather.

    • Rowdy says:

      01:34pm | 25/03/10

      Oh Victor…....you are a very unattractive man….....

    • Adam says:

      01:04pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC does not duplicate the work of the private sector to any large extent. Show me a commercial network with the depth and breadth of news, documentaries and international programming that the ABC offers.

    • Young ABC viewer says:

      01:04pm | 25/03/10

      The first and most important element of the ABC must surely benews and currant affairs content without the bias of commercial interest.

      The second objective of australian content.

      Surely this has risien not as a result of ‘new media’ but because media outlets want to charge for online content and the free ABC news would render there business models unviable. Also, the ABC has had some very successful TV content recently and the commercial networks and pay TV really don’t like loosing the younger viewers to the ABC.

    • Weary says:

      01:10pm | 25/03/10

      It should just re-run episodes of Idol and Big Brother, from previous seasons, over and over.  Period.  If we don’t support these show they may not last, and that terrifies me as much as it terrifies other talentless imbeciles who crave fame despite the notable handicap of having no talent whatsoever.

    • Sam says:

      01:11pm | 25/03/10

      Real news from the ABC unlike the news from commercial TV which is crap.
      Particularly like Lateline & Landline.

    • Vic says:

      01:06pm | 25/03/10

      1. Providing strong, vibrant competition to News Ltd, Fairfax etc in all areas of new content. For all it’s flaws, it’s the independent voice that a democracy needs. 2. Extending Media Watch to 30 minutes. 3. Getting rid of all the low quality British stuff.

    • ryan says:

      01:12pm | 25/03/10

      abc is a top rate television,its commentry are unbiased, and the journalist are arereally good,just take a lok at media watch providing some of insight into some of other so called journalistic-put them into shame.

    • Shan says:

      01:16pm | 25/03/10

      Leave the ABC alone! They do a fantastic job offering good programming that from what I’ve seen provides factual information with the opportunities for reporters to provide non-purchased opinions on interesting topics.

    • Zeta says:

      01:16pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC should bite the bullet and start producing all the ideas for TV shows I send them, such as:

      Watch Zeta Hunt and Kill Australia’s Idols - Urban survival program in the vein of Man vs Wild, Zeta hunts down contestents from various Australian Idol seasons, Big Brother contests and Top Models and subjects them to hours of endless torture.

      Untitled Colonial Vampire Drama - Reveals the secret history of Sydney, Governor Macquarie fights vampires and drunkards in colonial New South Wales.

      ‘Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ‘07’- Follows the lives of an edgy group of Liberal staffers as they stave off impending defeat and unemployment with a heady cocktail of booze, drugs, and sex. Stars Bronwyn Bishop as herself.

      Untitled Avant Garde Comedy Project - Zeta produces a weekly half hour of ultra violent black comedy, existential despair and heart warming laughs to a sinister ambient soundtrack influenced by Aphex Twin.

      Post Modern Children’s Cop Show - Set in Far North Queensland, tells the stories of ordinary Police and the Indigenous Australians who accidently die around them from the perspective of a happy go lucky set of stairs who people keep accidently tripping over multiple times every few minutes leading to fractured skulls and broken ribs.

    • James1 says:

      01:48pm | 25/03/10

      Now there is a list of shows I could really get into.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      07:24pm | 25/03/10

      Sign me up Zeta - can’t wait for the ultra violent black comedy - will Rove be in it?

    • Marke says:

      01:11pm | 25/03/10

      The best news on TV is on SBS. So why don’t we just rebroadcast this on the ABC?  I also think the left wing political bias of the ABC’s current affairs journalists is unprofessional. Tony Jones and to a lesser extent Barrie Cassidy and Kerry O’Brien please take note.

    • Anthony says:

      01:18pm | 25/03/10

      I have to agree that it is time to be abolished.  The ABC is funded by the taxpayer and as such should be neutral and have no barrows to push. You go to school and have socialist propaganda rammed into your head then turn on the ABC for more of the same.

    • Malcolm Buchanan says:

      01:20pm | 25/03/10

      Leave the ABC alone.  Let them be creative, developmental, meet a particular clientele that doesn’t like the claptrap of 30 sec grabs that skew perceptions.

      You can’t help but notice that after the ABC has shown/developed programs, the commercials pick them up to meet a different clientele.
      This demonstrates a lack of vision by commercials.

      Commercials will follow the crowd.  They won’t lead the way.

    • Trowzers says:

      01:24pm | 25/03/10

      I’d like them to have a regular daytime timeslot where they show old documentaries to show us how we got where we are now (not just ABC documentaries either).  Even if they are out of date or misinformed - then a short panel show afterwards discussing them.  Maybe rescreen Walkley award winning docos as part of this.  Put this up in the Judge Judy/Days of Our Lives timeslot.
      Other than that - keep doing what you they doing!  ABC is my ‘default’ channel.  Very, very rarely do I watch the commercial channels these days and then usually only for one specific show like House.  If the ABC is not showing something I’m interested in- I usually end up turning the TV off!  How could I think that ABC TV is ‘duplicating mainstream TV’ when the ‘mainstream’ stuff is so generally distasteful and repetitive?

    • Scott says:

      01:20pm | 25/03/10

      Last week I was at the Aus/NZ cricket test match in Wellington, NZ.  I encountered a pretty unpleasant piece of journalism.  The channel nine reporter who was there was rounding up the small handful of people who were trying to lampoon the Michael Clarke/Lara Bingle situation and get them into a small area.  Then she was trying to encourage the crowd to yell things out and make cheers about Bingle.  It was obvious that she was trying to get some footage showing that the NZ cricket crowd was making a big thing out of it (which of course it wasn’t).  Fortunately her plan failed and she was told to naff off.  This is an example of a commercial news reporter trying to essentially ‘make up’ the news.  It is an unfortunate byproduct of commercial television that people such as this reporter rise to the top.  Where does this leave the Australian public who want to find the truth? (or at least our best estimate of the truth). 

      Having watched TV in various parts of the word I can say that the ABC is one of the best news/current affairs channels in the world (and that’s tough to say as a New Zealander).  Australians who value the truth should be prepared to fight hard to keep it.

    • Zeta says:

      01:38pm | 25/03/10

      Only morons and school children believe there is any truth to be found, and if you watching commercial television uncritically you’re an idiot.

      As for the journo in question, that’s a great piece of journalism. Clarke and Bingle are a pair of celebritards that deserve to be lampooned constantly, be on the news, the weather channel, or in ad breaks on shopping television.

      That’s why the Kiwis gave us Flight of the Concords, while Australia’s idea of funny is Kath and Kim.

    • Crones says:

      01:21pm | 25/03/10

      Who exactly has accused the ABC of duplicating the work of the private sector?

      I haven’t noticed an increase in the amount of ‘lowest common denominator’ rubbish dished out by commercial stations as cheap entertainment.

      The ABC should be left exactlty the way it is.

    • Tom says:

      02:04pm | 25/03/10

      Sorry, Crones. Your argument is garbage. The fact that commercial stations televise rubbish does not give a tax-payer funded organisation unfettered a prerogative to ram left wing propaganda down people’s throats.

    • Crones says:

      02:28pm | 25/03/10

      Perhaps you could point out exactly where I said that commercial stations televising rubbish gives a tax payer funded organisation unfettered a prerogative (sic) to ram left wing propaganda down people’s throats?

      Strawman?

    • jay says:

      01:27pm | 25/03/10

      This whole agenda is just being pushed by Rupert having a gripe with the BBC, ABC etc. How is he going to charge for his ‘quality and innovative’ journalism, when state broadcasters churn it out for free (well from our tax dollars)?

    • Sam says:

      01:28pm | 25/03/10

      I only watch ABC lateline and not the commercial networks’. ABC is worth anything

    • Jarrod says:

      01:23pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC is the channel which is on most of the time when the television is on in our house. Years ago I abandoned the commercial networks due to their erratic scheduling of programs and tendency to play things out of order. I now watch the programs I want on dvd or other means with out the excessive amounts of advertising whenever I want, like most of other people I know. The ABC is the one channel which show programs which actually make you thing and more importantly *want* to watch week in week out.

      The ABC have made all the right moves to retain their audience. Showing a wide selection of programs appealing to most parts of our community. With the launch of the digital ABC channels, they are moving into the same kind of model as the BBC uses in the UK. Their iView service is second to none in relation to web based content to the other Australian networks (who else deals with our isp’s to work out deals which makes data from iView not count towards our caps). As far as I’m concerned, my tax dollars are being well spent.

      My only criticism would be more programs giving up and coming Australian actors, comedians and musicians a chance to reach a larger audience. And no, that does not mean ‘reality’ programming.

    • Barny says:

      01:31pm | 25/03/10

      I would like to see a politics news channel that cover state and federal politics right around Australia as well as major developments around the world. Also I think some televised footage of court proccedings should be available on T.V so people can gain an appreciation of how the Australian justice system works.

    • Steve C says:

      01:31pm | 25/03/10

      Would love to see the ABC exand its news and current affairs content across all mediums (internet, TV, Radio, 24 hr news channel). The country does need quality in this area and the commercial media is not up scratch (witness ACA,  TDT and most print media).

    • James1 says:

      01:31pm | 25/03/10

      I thought ACA was a comedy show.  Do people really watch it for news?

    • James1 says:

      01:29pm | 25/03/10

      Buying more shows the The Wire, Breaking Bad, and HBO series, so that the commercial stations don’t show them in the middle of the night, and cancel and shift time slots sporadically.  What we need is quality drama - who cares where it was made?

    • Andre says:

      01:29pm | 25/03/10

      Make the 7pm news at 6pm

    • drew says:

      03:10pm | 25/03/10

      Keep the 7pm news where it is but make it australian content only, and have 6pm world news.  We don’t need ABC to follow the other stations with the same time slots.

    • John says:

      01:36pm | 25/03/10

      Leave the ABC alone. It provides a wide range of programmes to suit every taste. Look at the number of shows the ABC have run which have been either bought off or rerun by the commercials, especially the comedy shows. Non of the commercials have a programme as good as Foreign Correspondent or 4 Corners or even a programme like Talking Heads which is one of the best face to face talk shows around. If you have a complaint just let Media Watch know, they will follow it up. You can see the rip off shows on commercial which try to beat shows like Can We Help. The ABC suits me and millions of other Australians, leave it alone and keep up the funding.

    • Concerned says:

      01:32pm | 25/03/10

      Make the ABC subscription based.  That way those who like it, pay for it.  Then redirect the saved dollars into our very sick health and primary/secondary school system.

    • Melissa says:

      01:47pm | 25/03/10

      So having children be able to watch TV without junk food advertising and providing informative non-biased current affairs programs, as well as educational content for school children (e.g. Behind the News) has nothing to do with health and education? Huh.

    • Saurabh Das says:

      01:35pm | 25/03/10

      As long as the continue to spend money on “ABC Dig Jazz” I’ll be happy. (http://abcjazz.net.au/)

      Dig Jazz is Awesome…

    • Trent says:

      01:35pm | 25/03/10

      ABC is Left Wing, any statement to the contrary is rubbish, have a look at the posts no one accusing the ABC of being right wing… do you suppose there is a reason for that. I would like to see neither wing favoured. The ABC is not there to push political agendas. It would be nice to see them not reusing coverage from the Free To Air channels as that is always shot with a Bias in mind. Get out there and do some reporting rather than relying on the coverage supplied by the non independent channels.
      Also loose the show following the news No Corners is just a repeat of news it has nothing new to offer

    • James1 says:

      01:47pm | 25/03/10

      Bob Hawke and Paul Keating accused it of favouring the then-opposition - do you suppose there is a reason for that?  I personally am centre-right politically (more to the centre, though), and those of us who aren’t extremists generally find that it presents a pretty balanced account.

    • Gerard says:

      07:18pm | 25/03/10

      James1, yes, there is an explanation. Hawke and Keating used that ambit counter-tactic to neutralise Liberal accusations of ABC bias.

      I don’t find the ABC balanced. Their anchor men (and anka wimmin) sound like whining 1960s-70s students who never grew up. I am probably more anti-Labor than you are.

    • Simple says:

      01:42pm | 25/03/10

      This must be for the really simple people?
      How ABC spend it on tax practices of News and its subs

      Wasted money is Foxtel and rest of News LTD journalists *cough*

    • Chris Ford says:

      01:38pm | 25/03/10

      Rupert Murdoch wants us to PAY for the news.  The ABC does a fine job in providing balanced and clear reporting - warts and all.

      Rupert Murdoch cannot see value in the ABC at all.  He’s made this very clear.  He wants you to pay HIM for your news and entertainment.  This is where these arguments are really coming from. 

      The only thing wrong with the ABC is that it ISN’T providing enough service - expansion into other areas, such as a 24-hour news channel, additional digital channels and expanded Internet access is that I want MY tax dollars spent on.

      If a government cuts the funding, I WILL vote against that government at the next election - like many millions of others.

    • Alex says:

      03:14pm | 25/03/10

      Murdoch wants us to pay for the news.  If we don’t pay, we don’t get to hear Rupert.

      The ABC compels us to pay for the news.  If we don’t pay, we go to jail.

    • Panda eyes says:

      01:45pm | 25/03/10

      PSB’s by definition should supplement commercial mass broadcasts and not compete with them. They should focus on meeting the needs of minorities and highlighting the plight of the disenfranchised.

      By the way, the headline on News.com.au is grammatically incorrect. It should read “If it WERE your ABC” and not “If it WAS your ABC”.  Maybe this is a good example of private and public media.

    • Mel of Adelaide says:

      01:46pm | 25/03/10

      The private sector has not been able to replicate the quality of the ABC

    • Alex says:

      01:47pm | 25/03/10

      I am really pleased with the current ABC content. I’m sure it will need modification and updates over time but nothing drastic as far as I am concerned.
      It would be a tragedy if the ABC was forced to show the inane content that is currently on commercial TV.

    • Bogan says:

      01:47pm | 25/03/10

      Yep, down with the ABC. If it were up to me, I’d ...
      * Get rid of Kerry O’Brien and Tony Jones and have Peter Overton and Paul “Fatty” Vautin handle the serious interviews.
      * Drop Four Corners and encourage Today Tonight and ACA to run for an hour each.
      * Sh-t-can Spicks and Specks and give Richard Wilkins his own music quiz show.
      * Drop Foriegn Correspondent and add a new reporter to Getaway.
      * Axe Media Watch and ... ahhh, actually, that poses a problem.
      * Fold Lateline and have the commercial stations air their brilliant phone-sex fantasy ads a little earlier.

    • Eric says:

      01:48pm | 25/03/10

      Expanding shows like Mediawatch.

    • BaSH PR0MPT says:

      01:49pm | 25/03/10

      Hiring awesome bloggers like me who cover games and technology along with random op ed and vox pop stories! 140k demographic reach, ahuh, yeah baby. You can’t BUY my cult following. wink

    • Sam says:

      01:52pm | 25/03/10

      It really isn’t worth watching any commercial channel for current affairs or news.

      No commercial network takes its journalism seriously anymore.  They are purely for entertainment and for advertising revenue - not to be taken seriously.

    • heather says:

      01:53pm | 25/03/10

      ABC local content is great, especially the comedy, but for god’s sake, don’t let the PC mob get hold of it, or it will end up like 9 or 7. And get rid of all those awful British TV programs; impenentrable gibberish most of them.

    • Ben H says:

      01:56pm | 25/03/10

      I like the non-commercial manner in which the ABC produces its news and current affairs. News can’t be news when there is money involved; it becomes tainted and biased, and often tries to pass-off advertising and/or business/political agendas as objective, rational and balanced reporting. If I could write the law, there would be no commercial networks, and all advertising - except having your business name and number in the phone book - would be banned. The ABC never advertises, but it does seem to be somewhat dominated by the left on issues of religion and morality.

    • Jason says:

      01:55pm | 25/03/10

      How ironic for Rupert Murdoch to attack one of the best media sources in the country.

      He really has no idea, after squeezing journalism for all its worth.  And after sleazy tabloid media profits got thumped by the internet, he goes running to paywalls.  But he understands so little.

    • Joe says:

      02:04pm | 25/03/10

      I find the ABC is not only the most educational channel on T.V its also the most entertaining. Don’t change nothing. This could be a recipe for a bigger disaster.

    • Em & Em says:

      02:05pm | 25/03/10

      It’s comforting to know the commercial stations are pulling out their “tax payers’” angle as their reason for thwarting the ABC.  It must mean the ABC will be more than adequate competition to the tripe they call news on the other channels.  Long live the ABC.

    • Adam says:

      02:08pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC should be privatised.

      Firstly, why should every taxpayer should sponsor the viewing predilictions of a minority? And before you harp on about commercial TV bias, I’ll remind you that the ABC is biased and two wrongs don’t make a right, you hippy.

      Secondly, if governments can’t run a hospital, what are they doing making musical game shows?

      Finally, anybody who thinks it is appropriate to promote left wing views on a publically funded network (I’m looking at you Triple J) needs to reaquaint themselves with who pays their wages.

    • cats says:

      02:39pm | 25/03/10

      pffft what do you listen to then? Nova? Triple J is targeted towards young adults, most of whom support left wing ideologies. Build a bridge why don’t you.

    • Harry.V.Dirchy says:

      02:40pm | 25/03/10

      I’ll remind you Adam, that you own bias undies are clearly showing. All you have to do is listen (& look) at Fox News and you know who pays their wages - and their bias. Why is Julie Bishop always filmed with a Fox News Studio in the background ?
      The same sort of mentality applied Education funding should apply if one applies your logic. Why should taxpayers help fund private schools? Or are all those sunversive Sate Schools really hotbeds or radicalism are they?

    • Paul says:

      02:08pm | 25/03/10

      Careful kiddies, this article isn’t about serious discussion. Rupert Murdoch (owner of this website), has made it quite clear, and on numerous occasions that he’d like to see the ABC vanish into thin air.

      If our pollies weren’t so desperate for their 30 second grab on one of Ruperts networks, questioning the relevance of the ABC would be the thing that vanishes.

    • David says:

      02:14pm | 25/03/10

      Original Australian Drama, and not the generic Cop/Doctor/Suburban Drama, Something that Australia hasn’t seen before

    • JTH says:

      02:16pm | 25/03/10

      Why does the ABC broadcast things like Footy for example when it is already on several other radio stations?

    • IANB says:

      02:19pm | 25/03/10

      The drivers for this type of campaining are from those with a commercial Interest.  This is a logical campaign, in that it has very commercial roots because it is a good outcome to reduce the quality content output from other broadcasters and competitors. Lachlan Murdoch was on the podium in Scotland only last year complaining about the BBC’s unfair advantage in that they have too much content.  It’s no so much unfair and a flaw of the system, it’s just a historical fact that they own the output of > 50 years of broadcasting.
      This debate is driven from this very commercial view and completely ignores the topic of bias and conflict of interest.
      Every successful democracy has had incorporated within its structure the need balance power and it’s misuse.
      I think the same applies here, and their are plenty of examples in this sphere where it has been shown that their are numerous possibilities for a conflict of interest, and, because content is now far more important than the specific broadcasting medium ( think how you get pelted with the same news on newpapers,TV, phone & Internet) then it is even more important that we do our best to keep the balance.
      The concentration of the different mediums is also a real concern as there are real commercial drivers to pump the same content out to all the various channels without any additonal cost ; read human intervention and variation. If in the end you could have a small clique determining all the content on all the channels ,yoiks!

      I’ll bet my bottom dollar I know which news that Lachaln’s Dad watches when he’s in town.
      Vive la différence

    • Simon says:

      02:15pm | 25/03/10

      The best thing you could do for the ABC is to leave it alone! Aside from SBS, they are the only independent channel we have!

      This country can’t afford to be dominated by rubbish like A Current Affair, Today Tonight or Channel 10 (Generation Y) news.

      The ABC should continue to spend its $$$ on making shows available via iView and embracing new technology like their iPhone app. They are WAY more advanced than Ch 7 and Ch9 who are still churning out crap like a cheese factory.

      How many more reality, dance, cook, fat, sing shows can we make in this country? That’s Australian TV for you.

    • club matt says:

      02:15pm | 25/03/10

      Mr Squiggle

    • Dave says:

      03:51pm | 25/03/10

      I’m glad that someone has finally said what needs saying!

    • notsurprised says:

      02:18pm | 25/03/10

      This is a fact. The ABC is just one of the many government bodies that frivilously waste taxpayer money in order to justify their budgets. Initiative to save money is not promoted because departments need to justify their high costs in order to secure the same, if not more, money the following year. This is how the system has been functioning for years. I know of one person at the ABC who had the idea of selling redundant video equipment to try to recoup some costs, only to be told to forget it because it wasn’t in their (collective) interests. Often the ABC would aquire new equipment when it wasn’t necessary for just this reason. Aren’t you happy that your hard earned tax is being put to good use?

    • Peter says:

      02:24pm | 25/03/10

      Lose all the spruiking lefties and their insufferable agendas. Until that happens, I refuse to watch (or listen to) the ABC

    • Michael_S says:

      02:25pm | 25/03/10

      ...Yes, and Australia needs more endless dumb coverage of Lara Bingle and any other moronic celebs.

      ABC and SBS have become the only news I watch because I got so sick of celebs being covered by other news sources. We only have PayTV for sports and documentaries. The rest is all endless repeats…How many times can you really watch Gilmore Girls, Simpsons, etc?

    • Lachlan says:

      02:31pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC runs good programming you can’t - and wouldn’t see - on commercial television, due to the profit motive. I watched a great Australian documentary the other night about a photographer on Lake Eyre. No commercial channel would have screened it, but it was absolutely amazing.

      That’s what the ABC is good for - it does its job well and it’s well resourced. I think the 24 hour news network is a great idea too, because people who can’t afford pay tv don’t have a 24 hour news network.  Plus, there are some areas of Australia where distances and infrastructure costs compared to viewers wouldn’t support a number of privately owned broadcasters - the ABC is really important in rural and regional australia, for example.

    • Scott says:

      02:40pm | 25/03/10

      More infrastructure for its news team.

      An award winning news service and its Journalists in the field can’t get a Logo raincoat or a decent link to the office through which to broadcast breaking news.

      The commercials can manage it…Why can’t the publicly funded ABC?

    • Nicholas says:

      02:36pm | 25/03/10

      SBS AND ABC is the ONLY quality TV available! If anyone touches them…they will have to mess with me first. I get angry when people touch my ABC!

    • Lea says:

      02:36pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC is so boring. Once it had a place supplying quality programming for all ages. Now however it seems there is no quality to it at all. The news is still biased becuase it has a ‘holier than now’ air. The ‘Rockwiz’ type shows are for those left ‘above everyone else’ wingers and fail to be entertaining to anyone else. The early childhood programming is non-sensical rubbish, the ‘tween’ programming is comparable to a bad sitcoms and reality shows. The days of quality shows and programming at the ABC are truly over. No more Seachange, no more Degrassi High (old or new versions or similar type programs). Not to mention the disaster that has become Rage. Why bother with the station at all?

    • Peter says:

      02:50pm | 25/03/10

      Not to mention the swag of 1940 movies it runs - at least the last time I looked about ten years ago

    • Gus says:

      02:47pm | 25/03/10

      Its not the ALP’s ABC money to spend - its ours. Start by paying our the current contracts of the bunch of rabid left wing global warming alarmist, left wing, Labor loving, one eyed, narrow minded, idealogical driven so called journalists, and do it now. Once thats done, find new fair minded people to host, 7.30 Report, Lateline, Q&A, Insiders etc, and get back to the basics of reporting news and current affairs with balanced opinion pieces. I used to enjoy the ABC and wander in to have a look now and then - I then reach for the remote soon as Red Kerry or Jones opens their mouth. Must be some stupid form of self torture I put myself through!!  Or we could just save money and privatise the ABC and save the taxpayer heaps, which would be a much better and cheaper solution.

    • Angus says:

      02:41pm | 25/03/10

      We need the ABC to provide a standard that none of the commercial networks could ever provide. I view the ABC with the highest regard, especially in terms of their attitude towards journalism. I know they can sometimes put out some boring stuff which you have to question, but what other network doesn’t? They are very dedicated to providing unbiased, comprehensive coverage on issues that ACTUALLY affect the people and culture of Australia. News Limited needs to lay off, I’m happy for my tax dollars to go towards something even if I don’t watch it, but know how important it is!

    • Pendulum says:

      02:49pm | 25/03/10

      The one thing the Conservatives do MUCH better than Labor who are geneuinely trying to get on with the incredibly difficult task of fixing eleven wasted years of neglect in critical areas of public health, mental health, dental health, public education, disabilities and environment….is play/manipulate/control the media.

      Daily our country is bombarded with right wing froth from 7, 9 and 10, the shock jocks, Jones, Sattler and the like. Joe Hockey, Tony Abbot - kings of hype over substance and about as much positive policy as an empty plastic bag.

      The commercial media is about as factual and substantial in their political analysis as yosemite sam - without the ABC and SBS we may as well all go and live in Saudi Arabia as if/when the right wingers like Mr Abbot and Co get there way - there will be little difference.

    • Tegan says:

      02:50pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC might swing more with the left wing of politics, but because of the ABC ACT 1983, IT IS EDITORIALLY INDEPENDANT.

      Not everyone would agree with the programming or financing of the ABC but the ABC is crucial to the development of Australian Arts. Many shows that wouldn’t have been given a chance on commercial networks, have become a great success with the guidance of the ABC. Not to mention that if you want a new story with any substance then usually your only option is The ABC.

      I would much rather my tax money go to funding a network that doesn’t ram adverts down my kids throats to pay for an American television program and ‘report’ on Brad and Angelina’s relationship status or botched up boob jobs. We need at least one other option.

    • codeturner says:

      02:46pm | 25/03/10

      Information is power.  That fact alone should be enough to dissuade anyone from abolishing national broadcasting body.  It is the only line of defense agains comercial broadcasters whose job is to increase shareholder wealth, often at the expense of the truth and certainly the taste. The comercial broadcasters have their place in the media mix just as the national broadcaster has and removing either would skew the picture in the favour of the remainig camp.  To right wing orientated - “Profit over substance” is not a good recepe for smart population.  To left wing orientated - not all problems are caused by “profit chasers”.  To the rest - “vote with your remotes”.

    • P. Darvio says:

      02:46pm | 25/03/10

      Americans put a Man on the Moon for 8 cents a day per citizen over the life of the Apollo Program. Wasn’t the ABC’s catch cry that it only cost the taxpayer each “8 cents a day”? So my question to the ABC is when are they putting a man on the Moon?

    • jay says:

      02:48pm | 25/03/10

      The ABC should invest in those things that most scurrilous Australian news media fail to invest in .... quality news and journalism.

    • Jane says:

      02:54pm | 25/03/10

      Save money and angst.

      Privatise the ABC.

      It’s not as if communications haven’t advanced and people living out in the sticks need to tune in on a sideband radio to get the news any more.

      The Government owned Communications Centre is an anachronism now. It has served its purpose.

      Let the ABC compete on a level playing field - privatise it and put the money towards health or Education.  The same goes for the SBS and any other hangers on to the public purse.

      People who want to watch quality programs will still tune in.

    • drew says:

      03:21pm | 25/03/10

      Yeah privatise it…  we could do with another channel that continuously plays endless reruns of seinfeld - yeah right.

    • Nathan says:

      02:49pm | 25/03/10

      I propose they hand it back. Firstly, it’s not their money, it’s OUR money (sorry Penbo). I don’t think we really need the ABC. If anyone wants such a thing, they can purchase such a thing, be it recycled BBC shows or Lefty, editorialised ‘news’. The advertising-assisted networks provide enough colour and movement for the mouth-breathers, and everyone else who has a job can decide what additional content they want to buy with the money they get from a tax cut. Perhaps it could go on healthcare, if they see fit. After all, its our money.

    • David Hallam says:

      02:53pm | 25/03/10

      ABC great, especially “I View” where there are really great shows to watch in my time and thedownloads on the ABC national- Great !.  Better than BBC and CNN.  Keep up the leading edge stuff

    • Blink says:

      03:00pm | 25/03/10

      How about some fair and balanced news and current affairs?  Getting rid of media watch or at least making it impartial?  At the moment the only worthwhile things on the ABC are the kids shows that keep my kids entertained on the rare occasions they actually watch it.

    • Spectoral says:

      03:00pm | 25/03/10

      Sitcoms. ABC is not just about News. It’s about Aussie entertainment that we can then export. Invest ABC money into quality Australian sitcoms like the BBC do! I’m sick of a) Yet another Crime show, and b) All the clones of game shows, panel shows, recycled out-of-work comedian talkshows and novelty shows. They are cheap, repetitive and wasteful of proper talent and timeslots. How about a thinktank of creative writers and some great COMEDIES? Why can’t we have our own “The IT Crowd” / “Father Ted” etc… no proper sitcoms since Hey Dad!? Btw, no more Aussie Battler stories. Get some original ideas!

    • Clara says:

      03:07pm | 25/03/10

      “Holier than now”? Oh dear.
      If some of you ABC haters would actually tune in to the occasional 7:30 Report or Lateline, rather than the latest episode of Australia’s Fattest Idiot, maybe we’d have a slightly better-informed populace. Don’t worry, I’m sure the occasional episode is not going to turn you into a raging Communist.

    • Scott W says:

      03:05pm | 25/03/10

      ABC has proved itself as an innovator and ahead of the curve in recent years. They provide real news, they discuss the real issues in there current affair programs, they provide an alternative to Americanised TV programs and your not bombarded with advertising like we are in almost every other form of media. To top it off there ‘iview’ website is better than any other Australian tv stations alternative. I would prefer not to be fed the dribble that the other stations come up with. The only reason not to watch the ABC or SBS is if you want to watch sports that the larger stations have secured. At the end of the day people will complain because the ABC is not like the other stations but that’s exactly why we need to keep it.

    • xenu says:

      03:28pm | 25/03/10

      Why has the ABC spent $1.5 million in 4 years on 4 different versions of a project to replace it’s web content management system? This included a junket overseas to Europe so that managers could see various vendor systems working. Whats to see working in a web page that can’t be demonstrated on a laptop?
      Spend my money better than this.

    • Steve says:

      03:47pm | 25/03/10

      1) 24 Hour news channel
      2) More Aussie made shows that aren’t a so called “reality show” (hardly reality)
      3) Locally made documentaries.  Not just nature Doco’s either, have a wide variety.
      4) A big production show.  There is no show made in Australia right now, by any network which expresses Aussie culture AND has a story too it.  Only problem is many Aussies don’t seem to know our own culture.  Yet at the same time no producer seems willing to take a risk.  So lets see if someone can have an entertaining big production (lots of money/actors/resources) kind of show.  Try floating some original ideas.  Basically do something the commercial stations wouldn’t try. ...gee thinking back to #3, I can think of Doco’s that the no one would make, how about suppressed cultures and ideas…like ..umm.. Nimbin…  lol.. no one would do that would they?  (That’s out there in left field)  Or a comedy show based on it… There’s one, how about a comedy show on a Principality in oz, Australia has more Principalities than any other country.  There’s 2, ... try a story line that’s completely original but also based on something that happens in Australia, and could also be made entertaining, it’s not hard just take a risk!  There are lots of Unique thinks in Oz, it always annoys me people seem to judge what would/wouldn’t work by looking through glasses fogged up with lots of American TV.  Otherwise its just Outback stuff…  No wonder the rest of the world thinks we have no culture.  Cause we can’t even find it on our own on TV!

    • Amanda says:

      03:49pm | 25/03/10

      Hardcore investigative journalism. After all, no other media spends money on it anymore.

    • Freeman says:

      04:00pm | 25/03/10

      it seems that the ABC has reporters on overseas junkets all the time. much more so that privately owned media. they always cross to such and such africa, joe blow in spain, someone else in greece, it must be a good gig and it must cost a bomb.
      but my biggest problem with ABC is the ideology and objectiveness of it’s news reporting. some of the posters on this thread can’t seem to see this, and this is likely because those who can’t see the ABC’s bias agree with it.
      you just have to look at the 4 corners hour long attack on tony abbott to see it. you’d think it was a crime to be catholic! they constantly attack the libs and were the major pushers of the “children overboard” story for months but illegal boat people barely get a mention now.  their bias is best shown in what they choose to report. now ALL media is biased, but the ABC is publicly owned and funded and should be unbiased .How dare they use public money to push their own agenda!

    • Sam Chowder says:

      04:22pm | 25/03/10

      An iron for Kerry O’briens skin - Full HD TV is not kind.

    • John T says:

      04:57pm | 25/03/10

      1. 24 hour News channel with international, national and local coverage, even if the latter requires separate state/regional programs.

      2. A website where news stories, especially local news stories don’t disappear without trace

      3. A better search engine which allows easier retrieval of stories from the archives.

      4. Archiving all news stories (video and text only)  online indefinitely.

      5. Rebroadcasting APAC or, if that not possible, broadcasting of parliament (and committees thereof) .

      6. Allowing ads (as BBC World News does) where programs are transmitted or available online in overseas markets.

    • Shelley says:

      12:31am | 26/03/10

      Before the ABC worry too much about their plan for world domination it’d be nice if they could figure out a way for people in Australia to receive their broadcasts when the wind blows. The quality of the ABC Breakfast show is a joke both for it’s poor reception and it’s poor presentation. It’s got about an hour max of worthwhile content if you’re really generous . The rest is repeats. And the presenters leave a hell of a lot to be desired. 
      Before I became aware of the left lean on the ABC I was horrified by a couple of segments I happened to catch of 7.30 Report, Lateline, and Q&A. Now I can’t be bothered with the dribble they produce.
      The dribble Greens member Clive over on The Drum is allowed to publish unchecked is also a disgrace. The cancellation of a couple of rights of reply the Drum had commissioned was a very poor show . The Drum is not Hamiltons personal political soapbox.
      And I agree with xenu. Why the heck do the ABC need overseas jaunts to check out web pages?
      It’s about time this taxpayer funded corporation had to prove itself viable by showing a larger viewing audience. Especially before any more funding was tipped into it unquestioningly.

    • Shelley says:

      12:54am | 26/03/10

      What he said.

      A snippet from The ABC’s waste of money on nothing new or original

      Most noticeable has been the steady decline in the intellectual content of the ABC’s programming. Ironically the ABC shows much less Australian content than the commercial channels, whilst we all recall Sea Change with affection it didn’t represent a distinguished period in the ABC in local output and the ABC has not yet recovered to levels of Australian output it had in the 70’s. It’s difficult to visit a seaside or country town these days without being an unwitting extra in an ABC ‘drama’ from that memorable series. But where is the volume we need of truly high-quality Australian programming? Where are the serious Australian-made documentaries, drama, mini-series and performance art programs on the ABC? You can still find them, but they’re fewer and further between than they should be especially given the current massive increased level of ABC funding.

      What viewers want and deserve and should be getting for their ABC taxes is superior, content and a capital A in terms of national programming. There should be more dramatized novels, more serious discussion of books and science, and more edgy ABC-made versions of, The Wire and Mad Men.  This—improving content quality and scope —is where the ABC should be spending the $137 million in extra funding it is getting from the Federal Government.

    • Daniel says:

      07:51am | 26/03/10

      They need a better news website. The layout of the current is shocking.

    • Justin Turner says:

      08:14am | 26/03/10

      Less niche broadcasting/programming, particularly when it’s at the expense of things that would be listened to or watched by more than 17 people & a dog.

      Digital radio is an area that strikes me as out of balance. Dig, Dig Jazz & Dig Country - how many people are actually listening to these services? At the same time there’s a struggle to broadcast all the sporting events the ABC covers because they are limited to Grandstand & (sometimes) Grandstand 2.

      One the claimed benefits of digital was that Local radio would be able to carry alternate programming on the digital version of the station (e.g. 702 Digital in Sydney) while sporting events were being covered. Due to the limit of 2 Grandstand channels, Local digital has to carry the sport too when there are 3 events to cover (e.g. Saturday night in Sydney - league, union & AFL).

      Leaving aside the fact that SBS was given way too much digital bandwidth at the expense of the ABC, the ABC must use what it has for the benefit of most Australians, not just small groups.

    • Shelley says:

      10:44am | 26/03/10

      The ABC has a problem. This comment for example lifted from

      http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_nowhere_to_put_all_those_new_australians/

      I was listening to ABC radio today and the presenters had Bernard Salt (the demographer) on but only referred briefly to the academic Bob Birrell (who opposes a larger Australia)in their discussion.

      Needless to say, it was a very shallow interview with the consensus being that any opposition to a ‘big Australia’ would be racist in nature. They even started the discussion by stating what they wouldn’t discuss or where they wouldn’t go. ie: the social cohesiveness or lack thereof from large scale immigration.

      If this is the calibre of such an important topic in our taxpayer funded media, I’d be surprised if the debate even ventured outside the parameters of the economic or environmental costs associated with mass immigration.

      The elite sections seem to be deliberately ignoring the symptoms now apparent in Europe, of such massive, unprecedented immigration.
      Nicholas of Melbourne (Reply)
      Fri 26 Mar 10 (12:59am)

    • David C says:

      11:15am | 26/03/10

      Why do we “need” the ABC? Why does the government need to provide a service that the private sector is more than capable of providing?

    • Guy Littleford says:

      08:00pm | 26/03/10

      Because, David C, the private sector IS incapable of providing fair, dispassionate quality news, comment and analysis.  And if you wish to challenge this, go see channel 7 or ACA.

      Because the private sector will show Big Brother, and SBS will show a documentary on George Orwell.

      And because you are a twerp, and I have some notion of quality and the value it represents to our society, pillock.

      Do you get paid by Rupert, I wonder?

    • Ross says:

      11:34am | 26/03/10

      The ABC is by far the best broadcaster in the business, how could anyone compare the commercial networks to the ABC. The ABC actively monitor for bias. Tell me when the other networks did that, or for that matter put entertainment up there with product flogging as important. There push for profit gives us pap like repeats of Green Acres and Gilligan’s Island. The only new programs invested in on commercial networks are so called reality TV or crime from USA .so they can make us as brain dead as Americans. Let the ABC spend its budget as it sees fit and increase it if you want to support Australian drama..

    • Guy Littleford says:

      07:49pm | 26/03/10

      We damage our ABC and SBS at our peril!

    • Mark says:

      04:15pm | 29/03/10

      If anything, the ABC should have their budget doubled, while we need to ensure that even though remaining publicly funded, it should remain a couple more arm lengths away from the government. I’d also like if they were not so heavily criticised if they tried to push the boundaries (e.g. the chaser fiasco). In terms of taxpayer dollars, we’re not paying much for it per capita. The traditional players in the industry are going downhill from falling revenue and the quality of their reports also deteriorating. Who’s with me?

    • thomas vesely says:

      06:02am | 30/03/10

      a better DAB+ signal,my new radio is constantly dropping the signal.(box hill victoria)

    • Chris Johnson says:

      03:18pm | 06/04/10

      Recovery!
      Bring back the Saturday morning Recovery session on ABC TV, with established and up and coming acts alternating as house band.  Re-boot is with new talent.  Look at where the previous generation ended up.  Dylan Lewis, Angus Sampson and most successfully Leigh Wannell.
      Other than that, how about a Saturday late night show for new talent to gain exposure.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @mumbletwits: +1 MT @meadea Adding voice to the boss RT @abcmarkscott: Hereby instruct @Colvinius to make a swift return to good health. (Take care Mark.)

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter