The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission’s final report is a much needed blueprint for health reform in Australia.

Can Kevin Rudd heal the health system?

But the recommendations of the report should not be confused with actual commitments and that is the real issue now: what recommendations will the Rudd Government actually commit to before the next election so as to actually have affected some change in the health system in its first term.

Before the 2007 election Rudd promised to takeover state hospitals if there was no improvement in services by state run hospitals by June 2009. This was actually crafted in terms of a “commitment by states to reform” but what people gleamed, and what Rudd was happy for them to take away from the promise, was that if there was not improvement by June this year he would hold a referendum for a full takeover.

The report has enabled the Government to dodge a bullet on the issue of a Commonwealth takeover of public hospitals.

The commission has shied away from going that far in its final report. The Government didn’t want it to and NHHRC wasn’t really going to come out and demand it do so straight away.

Today Rudd may has said he stands by the committment to takeover hospitals but the truth is all the pressure for it is now off.

Another deadline, this time a COAG meeting later in the year or next, has been created at which the Government will put its proposal to the states and if not agreed to there will be a referendum.

Still the fact that the commission did not recommend full Commonwealth control means that the Prime Minister can always point out that it’s not the preferred option of the real experts.

It’s worth remembering that whether or not a commission recommended a takeover was never part of their election commitment on the issue (it premised on whether states improved services in hospitals) but none-the-less it will now be easier than ever for the Government to argue that the takeover is unnecessary - thus getting around one of its clumsier and most disingenuous election promises.

Out of the 123 recommendations there is a lot to be excited about (though most of it already appeared in the draft report), from stand alone elective surgery hospitals, increased federal control of out-patient care to free up hospital beds and significant Medicare reform in dental care and new choices in coverage with Medicare “select”.

The changes to Medicare are estimated to increase the cost by 0.75 per cent of incomes.

The merits or otherwise of these recommendations can be debated for another 10 years but the task for the Government now is to answer the question as to what it will actually commit to.

Given that it is almost certainly not going to do anything on a hospital takeover in order to have actually achieved anything substance in its first term on health it must now decide what it actually plans to do to improve things in system that has 4500 avoidable deaths a year and wastes billions of dollars.

The commission represents an intelligent and experienced team of people from across the political minefield which is the health sector. If they can agree to a document like this then it’s fair to say it represents a pretty informed and considered consultation process.

By actually committing to recommendations in their first term the Government will engender trust and support that Rudd and Roxon are actually willing to do something in their second term.

People understand that health reform is not an overnight fix, but they get pretty sick of endless commitments to further consultation and caveat filled half-promises that begin to look like just another long waiting list.

Most commented

12 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Laura says:

      02:36pm | 27/07/09

      Similar situation where Rudd promised building of new houses for the Aboriginal Community. $700 million and not one house has been built. Commitment broken again. He’s always very sneaky the way he distracts our attention away from any bad puplicity for him and his Government. Constantly using the excuse of further consultation. Before the election these were sold to Austraians as promises.

    • Formersnag says:

      02:50pm | 27/07/09

      An infinitely better idea would be to abolish the states and territories, handing most of what they do down to local government to administer while the national government legislates and hands out the taxes collected according to national standards, guidelines and more equitably.

    • Paul. says:

      02:58pm | 27/07/09

      Rudds constant ability to keep dodging the bullets is going to come to an end. When we all get sick and tired of all his spin, he’ll be sitting on the other side of Parliament. His head is becoming so big it’s about to explode.
      And your right about being able to escape (once again) the consequenes of breaking an election promise it “premised on weather states improved services in hospitals.”

    • Lance says:

      03:16pm | 27/07/09

      When the deadline for Rudd Governments pre election promises arrive, we always get this excuse of “we are seeking more advice” “seeking further consultation” starting an “advisory commision to look into it”.
      If he was willing to make all these promises shouldn’t he have already done his home work. He was happy to stand up on his soap box and tell us” this is what I am going to do”. but now he’s not sure. It was OK to take our votes! He should have already seeked advice, already consulted, other wise his pre election promises are empty.

    • harry says:

      04:15pm | 27/07/09

      A politician is a politician is a politician. KRudd is no different and I for one have never trusted him.

    • LM says:

      04:54pm | 27/07/09

      You all need to stop with moaning.
      The only error on Rudd’s part was making the promise to take over hospitals to begin with. I’ll be first to admit, that was some serious spin.
      In terms of more consultation and breaking promises -well that’s not really fair. And it’s not something that the current government should be criticised on.
      The healthcare landscape in last 2 years let alone the last 10-15 has changed beyond recognition and there is a lot to take into consideration before making any big decisions.
      AND there have been MANY changes to the healthcare system introduced in the last 18 months that have saved us money and have improved Australian’s access to healthcare. The price disclosure agreement for generic companies was jsut one and was absoultely genious! The ridiculous amount of money that will be saved on generics will now be spent on innovative life saving treatments. Better treatment options are now available for people with chronic diseases with a better quality of life and the opportunity to continue working.
      Introducing nurses having prescribing rights to ease the burden on the diminsihing number of GPs in Australia? Introducing nurses aids to clear bed pans etc to free up time for nurses? Federal govt has established better medical training programs so we can address the GP shortage. I could go on for a very long time!
      I have a lot of respect for this goverment and what they are trying to achieve in this area.

    • Chris says:

      05:34pm | 27/07/09

      All this government will ever be known for is wasting money, by the time they are finally gotten rid of the whole country will be falling apart like NSW.

    • Emil Ang says:

      06:13am | 28/07/09

      And the public was very happy to swallow his drivel.

    • ryan says:

      09:14am | 28/07/09

      LM - half the reforms you mentioned (eg. nurse practitioners, nurses aids etc) have been around a while longer than rudd.  rudd doesn’t have the ability to think of a new route to take to work, let alone health reforms. 

      saying he’s going to do a round of consultation on the commission’s final report is a joke, considering the commission has just done that for the last 2 years.  and those who make submissions in this round, are probably going to be the same one’s who did so in the first round, and may not have got exactly what they wanted in the final report.

      rudd came out guns ablazin’ in the election promising action, but once in govt has been confronted by the reality of health care reform that those of us in the industry already knew - it’s hard, and it will pi$$ off a whole lot of people by challenging their power bases and frankly, rudd doesn’t have the balls to do it.

    • L says:

      10:01am | 28/07/09

      Rudd has no idea how to run this country let alone health. Please vote for him so we can all suffer alittle more. Thank you.

    • Chaz says:

      01:42pm | 28/07/09

      This Govt has demonstrated a propensity to hold 3rd party ‘workshop’ or ‘community hall’ sessions, spending on 3rd party consultants and finding ‘wiggle room’ in its pre-election statements. 

      Q.E.D. again with Hospital Reform.

      Kevin’s rhetoric, although long, will hopefully not be longer than the memories of those who held beliefs that his team may do something & who voted him in.  May they soon have the opportunity to vote him out for (more than any one group prior): over promising and under delivering.

    • YANGDeanne31 says:

      03:37pm | 16/01/12

      The personal loans suppose to be very useful for people, which want to organize their career. By the way, this is very easy to get a sba loan.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Malcolm Farr

@Drag0nista Can't see it bring re l 'ship Cos lots of Ruddites don't back gay marriage (Joel, Bowen) and lot of Gillardians do.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter