What is it about air travel that evokes in people such morbid fascination?

And if you could all just keep looking out the windows you'll notice the beautiful view of Sydney Harbour…

In his recent essay, A Week at the Airport, philosopher Alain de Botton reckoned that, basically, we’re all both petrified of, and obsessed by, air travel because our various religions have successfully instilled in us a prevailing awe of the skies, of the heavens and of whatever else goes on above the clouds:

“Despite its seeming mundanity, the ritual of flying remains indelibly linked, even in secular times, to the momentous themes of existence. We have heard about too many ascensions, too many voices from heaven, too many airborne angels and saints to ever be able to regard the business of flight from an entirely pedestrian perspective, as we might, say, the act of travelling by train.”

“Notions of the divine, the eternal and the significant accompany us covertly on to our craft, haunting the reading aloud of the safety instructions, the weather announcements made by our captains and, most particularly, our lofty views of the gentle curvature of the earth.”

You need only look to Greek mythology and the story of Icarus – who, in the giddy arousal of flight flew too close to the sun, melted the glue of his feathered wings and plummeted to his death – to know that man’s preoccupation with the mystical qualities of flight predates even the birth of Christ.

This may go some way to explaining the disproportionate air time and column inches the media afford coverage of flight delays, airport rage, terminal security, terror on the runway, terror in the skies, the mile high club, plane food, so-called emergency landings, and so on. 

The Australian groupthink about aviation safety is at best shrill, at worst hysterical. It emanates from a few noisy airline customers and the media – both of which feed each other – and egged on by unions that very effectively leverage the issue to extract favourable wage deals. 

This is not purely an Australian phenomenon. When he was CEO of British Airways, Sir Rod Eddington famously described the job as analogous to rowing a boat carrying two elephants – one being fixed superannuation obligations and the other uncompetitive labour costs.

The sustained scare campaign around safety and offshore maintenance has, ironically, done inestimable damage to airline employees by damaging their employers’ brands.

Take Qantas.

Their offshore heavy maintenance is at comparable or lower levels than since a small percentage of maintenance went offshore 40 years ago. Qantas did 92 per cent of its heavy maintenance in Australia in 2009.

Even so, and in stark contrast to the largely uncontested version of reality, offshore maintenance is actually of a very high quality and performed by the same providers that do 100 per cent of heavy maintenance for the likes of Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific and Emirates. Does anyone seriously suggest those are not safe airlines?

The campaign against offshore aircraft maintenance is, under an almost sheer veil, all about race. Agitators incite fear on the basis that our planes are being maintained by unskilled, downtrodden Asian serfs using nothing but staplers. It’s the same xenophobic subliminal messaging that underpinned the campaign against the 457 visa program.

Granted, it has been a hugely successful tactic. Do a straw poll at any barbecue or Tupperware party and 95 per cent of people will parrot the line that airline safety isn’t what it used to be since all the aircraft maintenance went offshore.

However, compare the rhetoric with the harsh reality facing the industry:

In the past year, more than 30 airlines have gone to the wall. SwissAir has sunk. JAL has just been bailed by the Japanese Government. British Airways is now all but a carcass – the question is not whether the UK flag carrier will fall over but if Downing Street will come to their rescue. Labour is not particularly enamoured of BA chief Willie Walsh and a rescue package should not be considered a certainty.

The Australian media, broadly speaking, has been breathtakingly delinquent in this debate. Either they can’t be bothered checking or wilfully ignore the indisputable facts of aviation safety. It may be a simple case of the truth getting in the way of a great yarn. And great yarns sell newspapers, boost ratings and increase circulations. Indeed the editor of a major Australian newspaper once confided to me that splashing Qantas on the front page on any given day inevitably boosted the edition’s sales by a significant degree.

And only recently I got stuck into The Punch’s very own Penbo for, as then editor of The Daily Telegraph, for leading the front page with the screechy and grossly inaccurate splash “RUSTBUCKET” following the QF30 diversion to Manila in July 2008. The Air Transport Safety Bureau later concluded that incident was the result of a manufacturer’s fault and not related to the aircraft’s age or condition.

We would all do well to remember that, on a fleet and service measure, Australasian carriers lead the world. Anyone who has flown within the US in recent years would have been lucky enough to pay ten bucks for a tiny bag of pretzels and a 200ml can of tepid Mountain Dew, served by a pissed off attendant bearing a close resemblance to King Tutankhamen.

When it comes to air travel, Aussies and Kiwis don’t realise how good they’ve got it.

- Joe Aston is an adviser at the public affairs firm CPR. He is a former Qantas executive and previously an adviser to then workplace relations minister Joe Hockey.

Most commented

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:39am | 11/11/09

      That silly ‘fear of flying’ theory is really scraping De Botton of the barrel for ideas.

    • Stu says:

      07:52am | 11/11/09

      I thought it was a well written article with the reference to Mr De Botton a great way to start. I tend to agree with the writer on Australian’s attitudes to overseas maintanance. The staples seen on a Qantas 747 were attached post service in Australia. There is nothing wrong with the maintanance and the Unions in cohorts with certain parts of the Australian media have over beaten the subject.

      The Unions use fear to lever higher wages out of the airlines. However their wage increase demands as a % of their pay were rather small compared to upper management. So there are always two sides. In the end it is the consumer who is going to have to pay.

    • theo says:

      08:32am | 11/11/09

      I have never heard of such a silly idea!

      Firstly, the heavens are so far out there, past the end of the physical universe, that no plane or space vehicle is capable of reaching them! Flying at 30,000 feet does not even come close!

      From a religious perspective, the wonders of air travel are because of how much mankind has achieved by virtue of the gifts granted unto us by G-d:
      That flash of brilliance of an initial idea; then the ability to conceptualise it; then the internalisation of the idea and application of it to the physical world.

      Mathematics is the language of the physical universe and science is using that language to understand the world. Engineering then takes it one step further and enables us to actualise it all into the physical. And it’s all a Divine gift.

    • Doug says:

      09:03am | 11/11/09

      Oh pur-lease! Nothing Judaeo-Christian or even faintly religious about fear of flying mate, it’s based on the simple fact that if a train or a car comes a cropper you’re already on the ground and you have a fair chance of surviving, whereas if you’re a mile or two in the air it’ll take you a while to hit the ground, and the chances of survival are minimal. Under the circs it’s natural for people to want to be reassured that maintenance is being done by people with a direct stake in the company concerned, i.e., employees, rather than some semi-detached contractors, at home or abroad, and to want it done as close to home as possible under the eyes of more employees, equally fully engaged with the company. Stretch the lines of supply and introduce more layers of communication and control and you increase the likelihood that cock-ups will a) happen and b) not be spotted or c) will be covered up. Simple logic and nothing to do with religion or race!

    • Ben of Margate says:

      09:16am | 11/11/09

      Religion? So when I was a small child and had dreams of flying out of my classroom, it was really because of Judeo-Christian ideas about the heavens? What the? The skies are exciting because we can’t get there using our hands or feet. Just as for many, the scenery and animals of the deep sea are extremely fascinating.

      Who is this clown. Religion-bashing has become numero uno on The Punch of late - it’s getting a little tiresome.

      I hope the rest of the article was as ridiculous - there was no way I could be bothered reading it after that claptrap.

    • Clover says:

      09:39am | 11/11/09

      Eric: nice one.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      09:48am | 11/11/09

      This is a great “Yes Minister” poll question:

      Do you support Australian Workers? Do you support high air safety standards? Should Australian jobs be offshored in the aviation industry? NO WAY!

      Or

      Do you support cheap air travel? Do you think air safety should be managed by companies specialising in that business? YES WAY!

      I think it pays to remember that 10 years ago it cost $700 return for a QANTAS flight from Adelaide to Melbourne. Now it costs $250. And given people choose even cheaper options than this, contrary to the shrillness of the media, quite clearly the people are ready to take whatever risk is there.

      Once again (it could be my pet theme): personal accountability! If you don’t want delays or cancellations, and want extreme standards of air safety, then be prepared to pay three times as much. Simple!

    • Jason says:

      10:13am | 11/11/09

      Religion has nothing to do with it.  Fear of flying is due to a lack of understanding.

      I fly light aircraft (as a hobby) and the best way to make your non-flying passengers relax is to provide a laymans understanding of how it works and why it is completely safe.  Don’t mention god!  I fear more for my life driving to the airport.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      10:17am | 11/11/09

      Religion plays no part in my day - don’t know anyone else where it plays any part.  There may be some residue like saying “my god” as an exclamation of surprise that is inoffensive but I am not wrapped up in any religions evil tentacles.  I get a little tired of so called superior minds like philosopher Alain de Botton coming up with a notion that deserves at most one minute of flippant comments over a beer at a BBQ by him, and did not even need to be written down.

    • Sandy says:

      10:22am | 11/11/09

      if you read the thing a bit further down the page i think you’d see the whole hasnt got a lot to do with religion at all. its more about the media and unions blowing things out of proportion

    • Gibbot says:

      11:36am | 11/11/09

      I’m afraid of Judeo-Christians.

    • E says:

      12:24pm | 11/11/09

      the most ridiculous introduction ever ...we are scared of flying because its one of those times when we have absolutely no control over our destiny, a bad pilot, bad weather or bad maintenance and we have no ability to save ourselves.
      I didn’t bother reading the rest but im sure it was just as bad!

    • J-boy says:

      12:26pm | 11/11/09

      Could we please stop using the phrase “Judeo-Christian”?
      If something is Christian, it can’t be Jewish at the same time. The two theologies are very different and it does not service to equate them.

    • E says:

      12:48pm | 11/11/09

      @J-Boy - Judeo-Christian is used to insult members of both faiths by implying that the two are the same.

      I did read some more of this, what utter tripe. The only saving grace is that the author’s bias is identified at the end, thus the whole thing can be written off as an unsophisticated attempt by one of our elites to tell us poor stupid plebs what to think on a given subject.

      The attempt to connect concern over international maintenance quality to racism was particularly weak and offensive (our elite’s stock in trade). The truth is that Qantas engineers were worried about their jobs and their ability to feed their families, which is perfectly understandable. Its a pity that Qantas executives (like the author of this piece) figured that we dont need engineers in Australia, we can make do with a lawyer and shop assistant based economy.

      Man, I’m getting angrier and angrier. This dufus of a writer has really pinned his colors to the mast with this total overkill peice. Hes a manipulator and part of that class of people who are terrified of engineers, scientists and other technical people, because those people remind him how stupid he really is.

    • stephen says:

      03:56pm | 11/11/09

      Bogans like me bro’ like the trains cause we aIways get sex on’em. (no kiddin’)  Planes, well its like watchin’ the movies - without the movie.

    • E says:

      04:04pm | 11/11/09

      I guess we now know why the qantas PR wing is testing the ‘people who worry about plane crashes are religous nuts’ and ‘people who worry about the quality of international maintenance crews are racists’ spin attack (total fail I reckon).

      http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/bang-and-flames-before-qantas-flight-turnaround-20091111-i8fh.html

      A Qantas flight had a bad bang last night, just making it into papers, how many dollars saved justifies putting passengers at risk? And why did it take until 4pm for the Age to report something which happened last night? Still hasnt been picked up by the Australian. Yeah, quality journalism worth paying for right Rupert?

    • stephen says:

      04:08pm | 11/11/09

      Where’s lucie’s Post for today ?

    • Rei says:

      08:20pm | 11/11/09

      I wonder what Alain De Botton would say about E’s true colours… something about status anxiety and general unhappiness perhaps?

      It seems well researched and well argued to me!

    • Andrew says:

      09:43pm | 11/11/09

      Rei I have to agree - E sounds like he REALLY came at this with an open mind… hmmm… then he was upset that the Oz lagged behind the Age on a totally non-newsworthy story… Hilarious. These are the 40 people in the world that the Age caters for. So truly tragic. E - maybe the Oz found it so lacking in newsworthiness that they laughed at the idea of running it - something the Age, as long as it has some anti-authoritarian bent, wll never do…

    • Dan says:

      04:27am | 12/11/09

      Just to go a little off topic here but Judeo-Christian-Islam faiths are actually quite similar , many “bible” stories can be found in any of these faiths

    • J-boy says:

      01:36pm | 12/11/09

      Dan, the “stories” are similar, but the lessons learned from them and the concepts of Divinty are quite different in each.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter