Her name was Honey and she came to live with my family for a few weeks in 1979. I was enchanted by her exotic name, the swing of silken hair down her back. She was the big sister I’d always wanted.

Showing baby how to empathise with planes. Picture: Thinkstock

My brothers and I had plenty of add-on siblings over the years. Joanne, who stayed for several months; the three-week-old baby whose mother attempted suicide. Mum never explained why or how they came. Instead, she set to baking double batches of biscuits and reloading the washing machine. Taking in foster kids was our normal.

Years later, my mum still works as a special needs teacher. It’s seen her bitten, punched and a victim of theft. But she’s also been held, hugged and relied upon by families whose challenging days bleed into exhausting nights. Parents and former students stop her in the street, all bearing the legacy of her kindness.

She’ll hate me making her out to be a Mother Teresa. “Stop it,” she’ll shush when I elevate her to a pedestal she’s never sought. But it’s thanks to her that I can forage deep within me for a compassion I don’t often show, much less act upon.

The glimpse of a wheelchair always takes me back to Hayley, a girl whose curled limbs and skin like waxed cheese were the crippling symptoms of a genetic disease that would claim her and two of her sisters. I doubt Mum even thought about it when she took me with her to visit Hayley. Back then you didn’t teach empathy; your kids learned by how you lived.

How different, then, my life with its token acts of kindness: a donation for flood victims, a photo of a sponsored child stuck to the fridge as evidence (to whom? Our friends? Ourselves?) of our charitableness.

Sometimes, in the dash between dancing, swimming and soccer practice, I’ll dump a bag of clothes with The Smith Family and tell the kids about what it does. But I suspect it means little – even less than the nonsensical link between them eating their dinner and the “starving children in Africa”.

So where do children learn compassion if not at home? And how can we teach it when we’re barely keeping upright on the hamster wheel of our “me, me, me” careers and lifestyles?

What am I showing my kids when I groan about the effort of having house guests? How can I preach giving when I’m “too busy” to manage their T-ball team?

And how will they know that tenderness, humility and integrity are valued when we increasingly measure them on their minds? Every two years, they sit NAPLAN tests from which they receive a series of black dots that, apparently, tell them who they are.

But how do you tabulate the natural or learned decency that will one day transform and invigorate a desiccated society? Where on the high school forms I recently filled out was the space to write that my daughter is a loyal friend?

They may learn it from books – as Atticus says in To Kill a Mockingbird, “You never really understand a person until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.” Or maybe from pop culture – Lady Gaga: “It’s important to be giving, to return the love back.”

But still I despair. So I turn to the person who will see it for what it is. “Oh darling,” my mum says. “Look what happened after the Queensland floods and the Christchurch earthquake. People still have good hearts. They’re just more stressed, so they don’t quite have the opportunity to show it.”

Most commented

34 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bertrand says:

      06:07am | 11/03/12

      I agree with the sentiments in this article; about the need for us to show compassion and to give of ourselves.

      However, I don’t think I see the argument that somehow there is a difference between ‘then’ and ‘now’. Your mum would have stood out in her time as someone who gave much of herself. As with today many people in your mum’s time would have been too absorbed in their own lives to be able to give fully of themselves. It wasn’t the time that was special, but your mum who was special.

      And as your mum once did, many people still do.

      The idea that the world these days is somehow busier and more stressful is one that I think is false. Sure, more people may have made choices that made them busier, but there is nothing intrinsically different about the world today that means people must behave differently.

      We all make choices, if and if one’s choice is to get on the treadmill of two parents both working full-time, then that is a choice they have made and they cannot then use that choice as an excuse, in which lack of time becomes some uncontrollable external factor that prohibits them from focusing on other areas in life.

      Too many people point to their lack of work/life balance as an excuse to explain why they can’t do something - volunteer, pursue a hobby, spend more time with their children, whatever. People have a choice about what they prioritise in life, and if they want to prioritise work over all other things, that’s completely fine. But they can’t then treat work as some type of uncontrollable factor that negatively impacts on those other areas.

      Obviously what I’m saying doesn’t apply to all. Families with both parents on low incomes unfortunately do end up with little choice but to both work long hours. For the rest of us though, that choice is definitely there.

    • Rose says:

      10:17pm | 11/03/12

      There is absolutely no difference between then and now, compassionate and empathic people still find a way to make a difference now. It may be that the means are sometimes different, but the desire to make the world a better place is still there. being kind to others will never go out of style smile

    • Carz says:

      06:18am | 11/03/12

      I think it is easy to show children how to be empathetic, and to teach them the difference between that and being charitable. To me, being charitable means giving of your money, or of things you don’t want or need anymore. Being empathetic means to be giving of yourself. Do your kids see you spend time with friends who need someone to listen and really hear them? Do they see you stop and help at car accidents to help rather than just drive slowly past gawking? Do you praise your kids when they stand up for others, regardless of how small the issue is? Do you teach them how to experience events as themselves rather than through the camera of your mobile phone? Do they hear you speak out about injustice and discrimination?

      My kids and I are in a situation where we don’t have much to give. Being a single parent and studying full time doesn’t leave much for luxuries, let alone to give to charity. But my kids will always find time to give of themselves to their friends, and that makes me more proud of them than if they could give away a million dollars.

    • stephen says:

      04:22pm | 11/03/12

      What you have described are different ways of being generous, ie. whether it be of time, or money or affections.
      Empathy, I think, is a way of appearing concerned without giving anything away.
      Nothing is at stake with this word.
      Nothing is really offered.
      And with it, we get fuzzy thinking and feeling, and we lose quality or perception.

      Forget empathy.
      Be selfish with your feelings if you must, but when it counts, that’s when the act is imperative, and not the facade.

    • stephen says:

      05:09pm | 11/03/12

      ‘quality of perception’ is what I meant.

    • Kipling says:

      06:39am | 11/03/12

      Good article, of course, role modelling is irreplaceable so it is well and truly worthwhile to question our decisions, committments and actions because despite how we may justify them, kids learn from the behaviour demonstrated regardless of the excuses….

    • Parent #1 says:

      02:09pm | 11/03/12

      Hard really. How do I explain to my teenagers why our PM is some unmarried liar with no morals or compassion allowed to be in such an important position? If we have leaders like that we can’t expect kids to get a mixed message. Why do the right thing if being a betraying and selfish person gets away with it all? Why be good?

    • BJ says:

      09:03pm | 11/03/12

      She is unmarried because she never bothered getting married.

    • Rose says:

      10:32pm | 11/03/12

      Parent #1, are you serious? What the hell does Gillard’s marital status have to do with anything? My kids understand the main problem with politics, that despite the best intentions of most politicians, once they are elected they become cannon fodder. The simple truth is that most politicians go down that path thinking that they have something to offer, that they can make the world a better place. Unfortunately they soon discover that politics is a game of strategy, that they must somehow not only bow to their party machines, but also to a public that will make judgement calls on the headlines, not the substance of what they do. I don’t see that Gillard is any more or less a liar than any other leader, state or federal, that we’ve ever had.
      I can also tell you that when it came to giving my kids role models, I tried to get them to look more toward people they had met, people that they were able to get to know. I did that because regardless of how many times you see a politician, singer, actor or indeed anybody in the media, you will only ever get to see a one or two dimensional image of that person, not the real deal!

    • marley says:

      07:53am | 11/03/12

      I wouldn’t worry so much about teaching kids to have empathy for the starving millions in Africa or for the victims of some natural disaster.  Teach your kids about having empathy for their pets, their family members, their friends,the people around them - when they can see the world through the eyes of the family dog or the old man who lives next door, they’ll soon enough be able to see it through the eyes of some kid in a refugee camp in Sudan.

    • acotrel says:

      10:25am | 11/03/12

      Teach your kids to have empathy for the poor bastards who might have to serve under them in workplaces, after they’ve grown up !

    • Rose says:

      08:27am | 12/03/12

      Better still, show your kids that you have empathy for everyone that they come across. You do that by no being judgemental, by treating everyone with respect and courtesy and just by basically trying to be a good person.

    • xar says:

      08:09am | 11/03/12

      aside from the fact that if you place that much emphasis on NAPLAN you have seriously got the wrong end of the stick - I really agree with the sentiments expressed. I think we all need to recognise that to give is also to recieve, a lot of people are searching for good feeling in shopping malls and jobs that make us time poor instead of realising it comes from helping others and spending time with those we love.

    • stephen says:

      09:31am | 11/03/12

      I wind my clock up with empathy, but I don’t think it’s a good word to use with people.
      Doesn’t really mean anything.
      Does it mean soft, or forgiving, or non-reactive, or does just stop short of sympathy, but heads down the same road, only to give up at the first tear ?
      It may even be a bad word.
      It may be only responsible for good intentions, (and nothing else) and the good acts are left for those who weren’t taught compassion, but were taught to go out and get experience and use up all emotions.
      You cannot teach compassion.
      But you experience love, and everything else - Empathy included - falls down beside it.
      Besides, I don’t want to crawl into someone elses skin ; I want my own, and if I have to be someone else to want to help - to have to not need a sense of Justice and Mercy, but to have to feel what they feel, which just kinda makes me feel guilty at my own better fortune - then I ain’t really human.

    • Kipling says:

      06:50am | 12/03/12

      um, the desire to “help’ comes from having empathy for people in shit situations….

      Without it, you will not have compassion. In fact without empathy at some level you will pretty much be a sociopath…

    • stephen says:

      08:28am | 12/03/12

      You help people in shit situations because it is the right thing to do.
      Empathy, (which is a form of self-pity ) is unnecessary

    • Cynicised says:

      10:47am | 11/03/12

      Compassion and empathy are attitudes which we can practice in our daily lives. If you show it your children will imbibe it from you. They will learn by observing your actions and your listening to your speech. Your Mum was special, and god knows, more like her are needed these days, there simply aren’t enough foster parents, but you don’t have to emulate her great heart to be a compassionate person.

    • Sharon says:

      10:55am | 11/03/12

      Good article Angela, thanks.  Your mother is one of those very special people who really gives her time to help others, not just money. More families now have both parents working, which of course means less time for volunteering. For many of us, it is about personal choices.

      I could easily go back to full-time work now that my two children are in middle primary school, but I choose to work part-time to enable me to pick them up from school 4 days per week, and also do a small amount of volunteer work during the year. My partner would also like to shift down to part-time work at some stage. We consider ourselves well-off on combined income of $120k pa. Most of us can choose to make time for some volunteer work, even just once a month, if we want to. We don’t all have the capacity or temperament to do the amazing work that foster care and other full-time volunteer roles require, however most of us can volunteer a small amount of our time to help others in some way. 

      Empathy and compassion is something my partner and I teach our children (and we don’t need religion for this). This extends to animals, and is why we are vegetarian.  The lifestyle and consumption choices we as parents make, as well as the honest education of our children about the impact our choices have, are critical for us as good role models for our children.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:31am | 11/03/12

      People who teach their kids empathy are crippling their kids for success in later life. It has been scientifically shown that the average rich and well off have less empathy and are more prone to lying and cheating.

    • marley says:

      12:47pm | 11/03/12

      @Shane - you’re only crippling your kids if your measure of success is purely monetary.

    • year of the dragon says:

      01:13pm | 11/03/12

      “it has been scientifically shown that the average rich and well off have less empathy and are more prone to lying and cheating.”

      If that is the case, and I’m sceptical, then those that are teaching their kids empathy may be making it less likely that they will be rich but they are not “crippling their kids for success in later life”. In fact, quite the opposite.

    • Chewy says:

      01:19pm | 11/03/12

      @Shane That is a worry, sad thing is you are probably right.

    • jase says:

      02:39pm | 11/03/12

      I fully agree with Shane on this one and its not really a personality flaw at all, its human nature. The nice guy/girl tends to finish last, that saying did not just originate from thin air, it would have originated from observation. In my experience this holds true for business and personal life, for myself and for others.

      Marley how exactly do you measure success? Monetary value is really the only quantitative measure. Your success is also governed by your social standing which is class, and well your class is generally determined via your wealth or power status.

    • kgrant says:

      02:55pm | 11/03/12

      Yes but does being rich and succesfull make life happy?  Take Gina Rinehart (as a prominent example of a rich person) how happy and well balanced does her life appear to be?  Anyone who has that much money and is still driven to make more, who according to the media is in court fighting with her children over money ... well it doesn’t sound that attractive to me. 
      If I knew that I would die in half an hour, money would be the last thing on my mind.  I’d be thinking of the pleasure I’ve given and recieved and all the laughs!

    • jase says:

      06:47pm | 11/03/12

      No it does not necessarily make you happy, but it sure helps. The opposite also stands true, does being poor and unsuccessful make you happy? I know I would not be very happy on minimum income in a mediocre job.

      I don’t have any issues with wealthy people wanting to build more wealth, it makes no sense at all to just give up making more wealth because you have what the public perceives as enough. Its all subjective, what I think is enough would be very different to what you think is enough.

      Family issues are not exclusive to the rich and successful, and although money does play a big role I am confident that there is as many family problems happening because they do not have enough money etc.

    • marley says:

      07:23am | 12/03/12

      @jase - I measure success by whether you’ve led a good, fulfilling life - whether people care about you and whether you care about them - whether you’ve made a difference for the better to anyone’s life.  Success is a lot more than the size of your bank account or the cost of your car

      My father never earned more than an average wage, and never had fancy cars or an expensive home - yet he was respected, liked and trusted as an exceptionally decent, gentle man by everyone who knew him.  What can be more successful than that?

    • year of the dragon says:

      10:52am | 12/03/12

      marley says: 08:23am | 12/03/12

      By some people’s measure, Robert Mugabe (or despot of choice) is more successful than Ghandi.

    • marley says:

      01:34pm | 12/03/12

      @Dragon - well, that just goes to show there’s no single quantitative measure of success, doesn’t it?  If you think money is the best measure, then the Bill Gates and Warren Buffetts will appeal;  if power, the Putins, the Obamas, the Kims and even the Mugabes;  if sports, the Nadals and Freemans and Bradmans and Thorpes; and so on. 

      I don’t accept any one of these as an absolute criterion of success.  And I think we should teach our kids that success can be measured in many different ways, of which money and power are only two, and not necessarily the most important.

      In the end, Gandhi freed a nation and his influence and ideals still fuel at least a part of what that nation has become.  And he has influenced a great many peaceful forms of protest over the 60 odd years since his death.  I doubt Mugabe will influence much of anything in 60 years time.

    • year of the dragon says:

      03:13pm | 12/03/12

      marley says: 02:34pm | 12/03/12

      “In the end, Gandhi freed a nation and his influence and ideals still fuel at least a part of what that nation has become.  And he has influenced a great many peaceful forms of protest over the 60 odd years since his death.  I doubt Mugabe will influence much of anything in 60 years time.”

      I’m betting Ghandi was also a lot more content and happy in his life than Ghandi.

      I concede it is hard to be happy if you are living in poverty but beyond I think that there are much more important measures of a “successful” life than how much wealth you’ve accumulated. It’s just that most other measures are qualitative and therefore, by definition, difficult to quantify or measure.

      Thus wealth accumulation is the standard, albeit simplistic, measure of success.

    • Bob Stewart, the Elder says:

      01:15pm | 11/03/12

      I was born in 1930. Back then mogther raised the children but these days, children are being raised from vastly different teachers. The fundamental need for a re direction is long overdue.

      20,000 calls to Drug Help Line, a Teacher KO’d with a brick in a Northen School and a boy holds up a bus driver with a knife on Magill Rd. But, did over 4000 “critical” behaviour incidents in schools last year.signal more than a change just to me?

      I have watched it develop. We do not teach community values and the role of Law to children in the tween years and I cannot believe that the Minister and Education Dept Adminstration do not know what those values are or they do not know or care to introduce them into the curriculum.i

    • Sharon says:

      03:25pm | 11/03/12

      Empathy
      Noun
      The ability to understand and share the feelings of another
      http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/empathy

      Empathy is an emotional response but unlike sympathy (which is often confused with empathy) it is not always based on negative emotions, you can have empathy for someone who wins a million dollars just as easily (probably more easily) as having empathy for someone who has lost their child. As positive emotions are easier to cope with perhaps we need to start here with our lessons in empathy.
      In your article you talk of other emotional responses (simpathy and compasion), actions brought about by your emotional responses (charity, kindness and sacrifice) and those concepts that fall into that grey area in between (loyalty, decency, integrity, humility and tenderness). These things and more are often (but not always) interrelated in any number of combinations. Because of this it can be very confusing as to what emotional response is being felt even by the person feeling it.

      I agree that living an example can greatly influence the level of your children’s empathy, so can experience (you had plenty of both as a child), where I disagree with you is the “tell”. Without talk examples and experience mean very little, if your child does not know why you or others feel or do something how are they supposed to understand why? If your children do not talk about their feelings or why they wish to do things how are they supposed to understand them? Someone must have told you of the plight of your foster sibs or you would not have understood why your mother did the things she did for them. To acquire empathy talk is just as essential as example and experience.

      Ps; as a mother of teenagers myself, I empathise with your concerns.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      06:22pm | 11/03/12

      Too easy Angela, you don’t “teach” empathy, you model it. To the day she died my Mother looked out for others, at her funeral the minister told us that on the day she died he received a phone call from my Mother asking him to look out for the young cleaner from the hospital because he was having relaionship troubles. 350 people turned up to say good-bye to her, one 61 yo bloke drove from Griffith to Gawler SA to pay his repects, he told me that if my Mum hadn’t staightened him out when he was 18, that he would have been dead or in goal. Mum was an ordinary working lady, with an extrodinary ability to show people their best side.

    • Liz says:

      06:36pm | 11/03/12

      Measures of success? How many people have you helped? How many lives have you had a positive influence on? How much $ have you secretly given away? Do you go in to bat for others? For those with kids, do they turn to you for help? Are they life-long learners? $ means nothing in itself. Any of these values can be quantitive if you want. Caring about quantitive measures of your own success means you aren’t successful at all in my books.

    • Kipling says:

      06:44am | 12/03/12

      @ Parent 1: First up, “ROLE MODELLING” does not require you to “EXPLAIN”. Once you get your head around that little concept you might start giving your kids a really meaningful gift.
      It is ironic you say that about the current PM, I had a conversation along the lines of honesty with an adolescent who had come into my care some years ago about the then current PM. Of course, I pointed out that the individual must always choose their role models. This might not be palatable but it is how this seems to work. That is why kids can come from a diverse range of backgrounds (including seriously harmful ones) and still turn out to be valued members of a community.

      Oh, and finally, this was about parenting, not politics. Your post appeared to be more than a lttle inane.

      Where are those posters who would attack acotrel ad nauseum? The above effort is lower than anywhere he goes…

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter