Each year the debate over the minimum wage seems to be dominated by people who’ll never have to live on it: economists, politicians, business lobbyists, and, I have to be honest, union
leaders.

Cartoon by Jon Kudelka. www.kudelka.com.au

We can all forget that a dollar means different things to different people. That for one of the 1.4 million Australians on a low wage an few extra dollars a week can be the money that keeps the lights on, pays the rent or buys new shoes for a fast-growing child.

Last week the ACTU lodged its minimum wage claim - $28 extra per week for a full time worker.It’s not a big ask when you think of the rise in electricity prices, fuel costs, rents and other expenses.

That’s why I want to share with you some of the experiences of Australia’s low-paid workers. The ones who keep the building you work in clean, serve you in shops and might be looking after your kids or your ageing parents.

Jamal is 55, he works late nights and early mornings to clean shopping centres for $16 per hour. He works weekends, not because he likes it but because he has to. His wife works too, but with three kids he says the money is gone as soon as it comes in.

He has diabetes, and says his main worry is how to pay for the medicines he needs to stay fit enough to work. His plea to the Fair Work Commission is that “they need to look at us as humans - we can’t survive on $16 an hour”.

Joe is a bit better off. He works for a youth service focussing on youth homelessness. Getting a kid out of a dangerous situation and getting a secure roof over their head is a satisfying feeling but it doesn’t pay the bills.

Joe’s wife needs to work to keep the budget balanced because Joe, despite his skill and his 24 years’ experience, suffers from the low wages paid by non-profit organisations.

He says this is stopping his organisation from getting and keeping good staff. “We become a training organisation, because people who love the work end up finding they can’t make ends meet so they move on,” he says.

People like Jamal and Joe should not have to feel guilty about asking for more pay to keep up with the cost of living. Strong economic growth shouldn’t be a spectator support for people who do vital but low-paid jobs.

Minimum wage workers are the backbone of the economy. They are the people who clean our schools and shopping centres, serve us in hotels, who take care of our elderly and our children.

But every year employers and business groups oppose rises in the minimum wage.

The latest reason is that Australian workers should have their minimum wage rise deferred because of the turmoil in Libya and the Middle East. That’s the same turmoil that’s pushing up petrol prices by the way.

Each year employers describe any rise as “irresponsible” and warn of economic damage.

That’s wrong for two reasons. First the economy is made up of people, and if people are damaged, by low wages then our nation is poorer for it.

Australia cannot afford to develop an underclass of people in low-paid insecure work, who do not have the chance to buy a home, support their kids at university, or stay healthy.

It is possible to have a society that gives a dignified, living wage to workers without high levels of unemployment.

Secondly, there’s no direct link between minimum wages and unemployment.

The Federal Minimum wage in the USA is $7.25 per hour or about $290 for a 40-hour week.

Their dollar is currently roughly equal in value to ours, but the low-paid worker gets half the wage of their Australian equivalent.

But the US unemployment rate is at 9.5 per cent compared to our 5.1 per cent. I’m yet to hear any business leader explain that one.

The fact is that profits across Australia have been growing faster than wages. To help low-paid workers keep their heads above water we need a strong minimum wage.

This is not welfare, it is a recognition that if we want to keep the egalitarian society we love, we need to make sure the contract cleaner’s income is in the same league as the CEO’s.

Life has never been easy for those on the minimum wage, but a fair pay increase will help a lot of our fellow Australians who work hard, and want a better future for their children.

More Kudelka cartoons at www.kudelka.com.au

58 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • michael j says:

      05:15am | 23/03/11

      $16 an hour,i m sure there are plenty of bosses out there that think it’s a bit
      much and will be digging their toe’s in to resist paying more,
      After all if pensioners can survive on half that what’s the problem ?

    • KH says:

      07:08am | 23/03/11

      Many pensioners own their homes after a lifetime of work, and therefore are less likely to have a mortgage, or be trying to get one.  They also don’t generally have small children who have school, clothing and food expenses. They also don’t have as many travel expenses as they aren’t going to work.  Those that don’t own their homes rely on services staffed, ironically, by the people we are talking about here.  Of all the stupid comments that could be made to this article, yours is gold.

    • michael j says:

      11:57am | 23/03/11

      many pensioners also can’t pay for utilities like rates,power,and water,many have only one meal a day,and its not caviare,perhaps you should open your eyes,,,,,

    • KH says:

      12:10pm | 23/03/11

      michael j - exactly - if pensioners are doing it tough, imagine a family trying to live on the same money….....

    • Al says:

      07:28am | 23/03/11

      While I do agree that the minimum wage (currently at $15.00 per hour, not $16.00) does need to be increased, the arguments set out in the article are not really valid.
      Cost of medications for a person is not the responsibility of their employer. It is their own responsibility to budget their costs.
      Same applies for rent/mortgage repayments.
      Besides, I survived for many years (at least 5) being paid the minnimum wage for PT work and having to purchase 4 different medications without the concession card provided to pensioners etc. plus rent for a 1 bedroom apartment and travel costs (no car) and food with absolutely no issues.
      Just find a cheap place to rent, may not be the nicest place, but it is what you can afford.

    • The Original Oz says:

      08:40am | 23/03/11

      A1 - “Just find a cheap place to rent,” They do not exist any more, especially if you have a family.

    • KH says:

      09:02am | 23/03/11

      Sounds like you were single too.  You can’t house a family in a 1 bedroom flat.  And I would love to know where the ‘cheap’ rental properties are in the current market…........

    • Max Carnage says:

      12:10pm | 23/03/11

      There are no cheap places to buy or rent in Australia any more, because of the massive real estate bubble. 12 months ago there was complete denial that real estate was in trouble, but now the realization is beginning to dawn on many that something terribly serious is about to occur in Australia. Australian housing is vastly, dramatically overpriced, by all reasonable measures. The recent analysis by The Economist is right on the money, and anyone will see from the excellent blogs on AustralianPropertyForum.com just how overvalued Australian housing really is:
      http://australianpropertyforum.com/pages/blogs/
      The bigger the boom, the bigger the bust, and the property boom that began in Australia in the nineties evolved into the greatest real estate bubble known to mankind. The bust that’s coming will be a doozy. As 2011 unfolds the spruikers will come to understand that real estate in Australia is dead for generations. During the next two years we can expect to see vacancy rates and inventory levels surge to unprecedented levels as house prices collapse by up to 40 or 50% in most parts of Australia. This might sound extreme, over the top. But how over the top were the 200% to 300% rises in house prices we saw over the past decades. A 50% fall is nothing in the scheme of things, it just brings prices back to a fair level. The bubble is dead. Long live the new new paradigm, where an average family can finally afford a decent home in Australia. It’s been a long time coming, but soon it will be time for the bears to party. Bring it on!
      Maxxx Carnage!!
      AustralianPropertyForum.com

    • AFR says:

      12:36pm | 23/03/11

      I guess every debate, not matter the topic needs a property price doomsdayer like Max Carnage.

    • John A Neve says:

      04:53pm | 23/03/11

      AFR,
      I take it you don’t think property is over priced?
      Houses for many years where 2.5 to 3 times the average wage, now they are about 6 times.
      Sadly I think Max is correct.

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:02am | 24/03/11

      The idea that a worker on minimum wage should be able to support children at university seems crazy to me.
      As a measure of ‘basic living’ that is way over the top.
      My mother, a single mum,was earning a professional wage, and was unable to contribute a cent to my university living and studying costs as a country student.

    • ZSRenn says:

      07:52am | 23/03/11

      The minimum wage rose by $26.00 / week only in June 2010 to $570 / week.

      An increase of a further $28 dollars now would be an increase of 4.9%.

      Reserve bank figures have the current inflation rate at 2.7%.

      The RBA is already squawking that inflation is too high and is talking about an increased interest rate rise within the next quarter.

      Surely to put more inflationary pressure as this double the inflation rate pay rise would go a long way to further over heating the economy and guarantee interest rates would increase.

      Sure it would be good for low income earners to have a bit more cash. They are going to need it if the Carbon Tax is implemented.

      It has to be done sensibly though and not at the behest of a Union Leader who only wants to make herself look like the hero of the poor without giving any thought to the economic consequences that such a large increase would incur.

    • PTom says:

      11:15am | 23/03/11

      What was increase before and the one before compared to your inflation figures then?

      CEO wages would have more of impact on inflation then workers. As CEO would be buying the new cars, expense holidays and paying for services like pay TV.  How many minimum wages people would have pay TV.

      One of RBA roles is to keep inflation between 2-3% which accord to you is in that ranage. The two speed ecnomy refers to mining profits and mining wages compared to the rest of Australia, you konw the ones that you just argued against getting a pay raise.

    • AdamC says:

      12:53pm | 23/03/11

      What nonsense, PTom. There are far too few CEOs out there for their salaries to meaningfully affect inflation. Obsessing about the pay of a few hundred people at the pinnacle of corporate Australia is nothing more than a tired political distraction.

      And heaps of households with minimum wage earners would have pay TV.

    • Get it rite says:

      03:14pm | 23/03/11

      You’re obviously living in a cave because they’re talking about cutting the cash rate because the economy looks like slowing.

    • PTom says:

      03:50pm | 23/03/11

      @AdamC
      Maybe I should not point out that the top 50 average corporate CEO is paid 6.4 million or that the average executive is paid almost 1 Million which went up at last year by 17.2% or that company profit increased 27.5% in the last 12 months while point out that the most disadvantage worker only got 4.8%  because I guess that would be class warfare.

      I know heaps of low income earns that don’t have pay tv too.

    • AFR says:

      07:56am | 23/03/11

      I can guarantee you there are hundreds of thousands of workers in Australia making a lot less than $16 per hour.

    • libertarian vegetarian says:

      08:51am | 23/03/11

      And most of them would be self employed/small business people.

    • AFR says:

      09:11am | 23/03/11

      Well, they probably fall into three categories, one being the small businss owner who works 7 days a week. The second is the low paid salary worker (often a young graduate) who is expected to work long hours of unpaid overtime,  and when you work our their hourly rate, it’s less than the minimum wage. The third and possibly most vulnerable category are immigrants working in a number of industries, who are paid cash. Most Thai restaurants in Sydney for example pay their staff $10 per hour. Now it might be great to get cash in hand, and its more money than you can make waiting tables back in Bangkok, but it also means no super, leave, workers comp etc.  I’m not suggesting minimum wage earners don’t do it tough, but whatever minimums we set, we are kidding ourselves that that is the “real” minimum.

    • Nick says:

      04:25pm | 23/03/11

      And why exactly does that make it ok to pay a person an unlivable wage?

    • JT says:

      08:57am | 23/03/11

      I should not be surprised a Union official has no clue as to how an economy works but it is quite dismaying to see that like a word on the tip of your tongue, the explanation to her questions and demands actually lie in her own column.

      Just quickly a few of them would be
      a) increased wages means increased costs, increased costs means increased costs of living.
      b) Jamal chose to have three children, and presumably also chose not to increase his skills or eduction beyond that necessary to be a cleaner. You get paid for your skill level, not what Ged thinks is fair.
      c) “Minimum wage workers are the backbone of the economy. “, wrong. Employers are the backbone of the economy, they provide the work, they pay the wages and yes amazingly enough, they employ the workers!. Without them minimum wage earners are unemployed.
      d) ‘‘Secondly, there’s no direct link between minimum wages and unemployment.’’ Umm, yes there is. Quite a number of case studies and research available that explicitly prove as such.

      And finally this ‘‘This is not welfare, it is a recognition that if we want to keep the egalitarian society we love, we need to make sure the contract cleaner’s income is in the same league as the CEO’s’‘

      Are you insane? You think the person who vacuums the office should have a wage ‘‘in the same league’’ as the CEO?

      For example there is a reason I am not a Doctor and I see no reason at all for me to be paid the same as one. They are on average, smarter than I, have skills I can not ever hope to attain and perform work I could not. I do not begrudge them that and you should not either. Envy is not your answer.

    • Chris says:

      10:23am | 23/03/11

      List 3 “Studies” that have been published in peer reviewed journals? And ones that don’t use emplyment to population ratio as the dependent variable.

    • Richard says:

      12:43pm | 23/03/11

      Yep JT, you are right. Obviously its desirable for everyone to get paid more salary, especially the poorest and lowest paid workers in society…

      HOWEVER!

      Wage rises don’t come from a central planning bureau just mandating it to be so, wage rises must come from productivity increases, that is the only way they can be sustainable.

      If wages just rise arbitrarily, without a corresponding increase in productivity, then that means more and more money chasing the same number of goods and services, which leads to rampant inflation, which drives up the cost of living, especially for people on the minimum wage, and so they end up being no better off than they were before-hand, except that now, because their salary has gone up, they have to pay more tax, so they’re actually WORSE off than they were before.

      Chris, take a look at this Peter Schiff video to understand how minimum wage increases can destroy jobs, and lead to lower living standards for everyone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LaPGIIAyk4

      He uses a real life example that is really intuitive and easy to understand because its actually just common sense.

    • Chris says:

      01:19pm | 23/03/11

      Richard - You’ve missed the point. I have been involved in this issue for over 5 years from a research perspective.

      There isn’t any research that proves the minimum wage causes unemployment. from the 1930’s to now. there may be substitution between jobs but there is no research that proves it. Look at the papers by Brown from the U.S or Lewis here in Australia. Or look into the Card and Kruger Debate in the U.S.

      Don’t use the political wannabe Schiff as a guide unless your mentally challenged. If I predict a recission for 10 yrs in a row of course I will be right eventually, they have happened historically every 60 months. He predicted the inevitable, but he is a joke.

    • Richard says:

      01:38pm | 23/03/11

      Did you watch the video Chris? I dare you to watch it and try to refute him.

      Peter Schiff has been right about everything he predicted. 10 years ago, when gold was $250 per oz and largely ignored by everyone, he started telling people to invest in it, because it was going to go into a bull market. No one listened to him, he was ridiculed, but he turned out to be EXACTLY right: current gold price~ $1427 per ounce.

      In 2006, he made this speech at a mortgage bankers conference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G3Qefbt0n4

      There is no possible way ANYone can watch this speech and think that Peter Schiff is a joke. I mean it. The prescience of the man, the detail that he went into, explaining exactly what would happen, and exactly why, before it happened, while everyone else was still predicting 10% growth as far out into the future, is incredible.

      And the fact that he was ridiculed, but stuck to his guns and turned out to be so right. Chris, you’ve just shot your credibility totally if you’re not willing to give credit were credit is due…

    • Chris says:

      01:56pm | 23/03/11

      The Internet economists messiah “The Schiff”

      If you read carefully, I gave him credit. “predict the inevitable” is still a prediction. It was right before I called him a joke.

      I’ll leave him to the rest of you ultra neo doomsday prophets.

    • Richard says:

      02:12pm | 23/03/11

      You’re being glib.

      He didn’t just make a flippant, generalised prediction for recession “sometime in the future”; he made a serious, in depth-analysis and identified problems in the American economy that NO ONE else had recognised, and out-lined in exquisite, minute detail exactly what the consequences would be, and ultimately, he was proved by history to be 100% correct.

      You are falling into the trap of ridiculing him yourself now: you’d better be careful Chris, or you’ll end up on the next “Peter Schiff was Right” video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw

      I guess that’s the thing about the internet nowadays. You leftist ideologues can no longer get away with just smearing and dismissing opponents who challenged you and turned out to be right, because we now have a digital record of it, right there for everyone to see.

    • AdamC says:

      09:30am | 23/03/11

      Surely there is a better way to set the minimum wage than this annual circus? I get that unions like the current process, because it helps keep them relevant, but it hardly seems in the national interest. Why not have a reserve bank-style body set minimum pay based on maintaining employment and, where possible, increasing the living standards of the low paid?

      And it should be stressed that minimum wages in Australia are high by world standards, both in an absolute sense and relative to the average rate of pay.

    • PTom says:

      11:29am | 23/03/11

      “Australia are high by world standards” but so is our cost of living.

    • Shifter says:

      03:06pm | 23/03/11

      @PTom - that’s part of the reason. Increasing minimum wage, increase the wage bill of an employer and thus the cost of services the employer provides.

      There’s a filter on effect, if you can imagine the coffee shop with minimum wagers now has to put up their prices, so the mid level managers ask for a raise because their daily coffee habit costs more.

      Minimum wage is a big driver of inflation, something that reserve bank, and government want to get under control

    • James1 says:

      09:42am | 23/03/11

      Perhaps you could lobby the government to lower taxes - in particular PAYG - for those on minimum wage to cover cost of living increases?

      Also, I am not sure a raw dollar comparison with US minimum wage is appropriate here.  The cost of living in much of the US is much lower than Australia, particularly when it comes to housing and consumer items.  Purchasing Power Parity would have been a more appropriate way of making the comparison.

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:07am | 24/03/11

      Yes, more efficient government is surely an incredibly important area for efficiency in our economy!

    • Mouse says:

      09:48am | 23/03/11

      So the Unions want equal pay for all, for a cleaner with no skills and tiny responsibility against a CEO with, more than likely, a degree of some sorts and massive responsibility. Aahhh! Now I see, this is what the carbon tax is all about! Getting the cleaner’s income in line with the CEO’s. Very clever. If you have everyone getting a CEO’s wage, the government isn’t going to have to subsise many people with these proposed tax cuts, is it?  Mmmmmm, that surplus is looking pretty good for 2012/13.

    • PTom says:

      11:34am | 23/03/11

      How does a Carbon Tax effect CEO wages?

    • Mouse says:

      12:40pm | 23/03/11

      PTom, I am assuming that you agree that the price of all goods that are produced by companies that will have to pay the carbon tax will increase. CEOs, and I am pretty sure most CEOs earn a substantial wage, will pay the increased price on goods. If you earn over $x, you will not be compensated with tax cuts to cover the carbon tax price increase. If cleaners earn the same amount as CEOs, the government will not have to give them tax cuts either!. See my point?
      It was said with a bit of tongue in cheek. Everyone seems so upset at the moment, either for or against.  It is a serious topic I know, but I was just trying to lighten the mood a little.  Forgive me?

    • PTom says:

      04:01pm | 23/03/11

      No Mouse I don’t as Carbon Tax will be charge on Carbon Emission,  everything does not need to emit carbon to be produce.

      I know it was tonuge check but I get annoyed when some post serious similar comments and mean them.

      Tho If everyone got a CEO average of 6.4 Million dollars I don’t think any one would be to worried about anything.

    • Mouse says:

      05:36pm | 23/03/11

      The way I understand it PTom,  is everything that uses, for example, electricity, will have a price increase to cover the tax on the electricity used to produce it. Tax on petrol used by trucks will increase transport costs, bus and taxi fares, ambulance membership, etc, etc, etc.  The biggest problem I suppose is that we don’t know many facts at all and a lot of what we are hearing is supposition. It would be nice to be told the truth and what impact it will have on us all.  But hey, the way it’s going we will all be pensioners by then!
      And you are right, if we were all on CEO wages, we wouldn’t care.  Oh to dream!!

    • MC says:

      09:55am | 23/03/11

      Apprentice wages need to be looked at before this.

      People on $8.50 an hour?!
      now thats a joke.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      10:43am | 23/03/11

      Agree with this, many of my employers struggle to find apprentices who will work for those shocking wages and unlike dole bludges that can do some work, get paid and still get the dole, apprentices just get a 1k handout for TAFE and kits and that’s all - people just can’t live on $250 a week, heck rent alone is almost that much.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:06am | 23/03/11

      Damian,
      Having been an apprentice myself, I’d suggest apprentices are over paid.
      For at least the first two years they are unproductive, added to which they have to be closely supervised.
      If apprentice wages rise too much it will be cheaper to bring in skilled people from offshore.

    • Tim says:

      11:13am | 23/03/11

      Why?
      You are being paid to be trained in your profession and it only lasts for the 3-4 years of the apprenticeship.
      When I was at university, I did 30 contact hours plus study and had to work part time to survive. The government helped out with Austudy to the grand total of $180 a fortnight and left me with a nice juicy HECS debt.
      But I knew at the time, if I stuck with it I would be able to earn more in the future, which I am. Why should apprentices be different?

    • AFR says:

      11:23am | 23/03/11

      Well its better pay than Uni smile

    • Dave says:

      11:31am | 23/03/11

      Hi MC,

      If you are so outraged by it, why don’t you find some way of employing these people yourself, and paying them higher wages?

      It’s very easy to make statements like this when you have no stake in the matter.

    • MC says:

      01:01pm | 23/03/11

      Theres a difference between education (uni) and work (apprentices) you cannot really compare the 2,

      John A Neve,
      Let me guess, apprentice for a big company? Yeah, generally they do nothing and are incredibly unproductive…

      and Dave,
      Yes it is easy to make statements like mine, also easy to make statements like “minimum wage workers deserve an extra $28 dollars a week”

    • Damian says:

      05:34pm | 23/03/11

      John, once again its clear that me and you live in completely different worlds….. In the industry I’m in (bakery, fully qualified) many apprentices are being expected to know the job and work near full trade levels by the 6 month point, yet still only get very little for it, and supervision? HA! I can’t remember the last time that I had time to watch a apprentice amongst the harpy screeching of packers, the abusive bosses, the unrealistic productions, the hours of unpaid overtime, broken equipment & the efforts that I go to to convince many of my fellow bakers to even stay in the industry (and if me and many bakers have a hard time dealing with it, imagine how the apprentices must cope).

      But again if you think Apprentice’s shouldn’t be paid more, feel free to try and live by yourself on $250 a week (I also don’t believe that the employer should have to foot the bill, but having government entitlements so they can at least get more than the dole would be good - not to mention it would be money worth spent over some of the *censored* Gillard is coming up with)

    • Huey says:

      10:04am | 23/03/11

      The $28.00 gets plowed straight back into the economy. The people on minimum NEED every dollar they can get to spend on living not luxury or disposable items. Wont the minimum wage flow on to all wages?

    • fairsfair says:

      11:17am | 23/03/11

      This article preys on the ignorant - me. I thought it seemed quite a reasonable suggestion, until I read the comments.

      And truth be known - I am only on a couple of dollars an hour more than that, but it is taken off me due to my $20 000 HECS debt and the amount of money I have to spend to actually remain employed (additional training, resources etc). Plus I am paying off a house (because that is apparently what we are supposed to do) so I pay more than I would renting. That is my choice, so if it gets bad enough, well I’ll have to sell my house for a loss and rent somewhere. Sadly, my employer won’t care and say here is an extra $2k a year.

      Scratch a little deeper Ged and I am sure that you will find everyone is struggling to keep their head above water due to the cost of living. I don’t think asking for higher wages is the way to go - the issue is the underlying forces that are driving up our cost of living. Address those - don’t put your hand out for more money.

      Petrol anyone? Due to the Libya issue the price of Singapore goes up? Why is that? Libya should only be impacting on the cost of the European markets only. Why, with oil at $100 a barrel are we now paying more than we were when oil got up to $150 a barrel? Our dollar is still the same. I don’t understand that, and it is only one of the many issues that is slowly bringing people down.

    • Rebecca says:

      02:15pm | 23/03/11

      I’m a uni student who lives out of home (my parents are in a rural area) and because I study full time, my only manageable option for employment is working nights and weekends in a fast food place. My parent’s can’t afford to support me financially and i’m not eligible for centrelink. I usually have enough each week for home brand groceries, bills, and my bus fares (a car? out of the question).

      The sad part is, compared to a lot of people in Australia I have it really easy, I know there are many who would be jealous that I have food and a roof over my head.
      So whatever your opinion on minimum wage, think about what it’s like to actually live on it. I can guarantee you it’s not fun.

    • JT says:

      02:49pm | 23/03/11

      Rebecca, it is not supposed to be fun.

      Ignoring the issues surrounding whether it should exist or not, Do you understand the definition of minimum? It is to provide enough for what you have; food and a roof over your head and you are doing exactly what is expected of someone earning min wage.

      You are studying to improve your knowledge and skills and once your studies are finished, you will no doubt see your income increase as time passes and experience is gained. This assumes of course you are not doing an Arts degree.

    • digger says:

      03:28pm | 23/03/11

      Physical manual work such as cleaning is a lot harder work to do than what a big fat CEO doe’s. Who only sits on their ass using a brain to work for them. Why shouldn’t a labourer earn better money for shear effort? Too many overpaid fat cats taking a a Hugh slice of the economic cake.Half the income of one over paid high income earner, could put more people into work for that company. Or for a fair pay increase to the low income earners already employed by that company.

    • Make it $50 says:

      03:40pm | 23/03/11

      It seems most of the idiots on here haven’t a clue what it’s like to be poor living on a fixed or low income.
      The prospect of doing a crap job day in and day out for a few measly bucks which doesn’t cover the basic expenses.
      Having to endure the heat and the cold because you’re afraid of the costs involved in turning the a/c on.
      Having to endure the pain because you can’t afford to go the dentist or pay the chemist for those blood pressure bills.
      Worrying if the next rent rise will put you on the street.
      The feelings of rage and despair knowing this is it and that it will never change.
      Then having to read comments from assholes who haven’t a clue.

    • The real workers says:

      04:17pm | 23/03/11

      A reality check for the elite. My wife and I, both university educated and with massive hecs debts, take home around $600/ wk each after tax. We pay $450/ wk rent for a 3 bedroom home on the Gold Coast with our 2 girls. Add $175/ wk groceries, $100/ wk fuel, $180/ wk to cover all bills, $80/ wk health insurance. Not included: social life, clothing, school excursions, books or uniforms, holidays, emergencies, car maintenance, savings. One would think an extra $30 a week would make life easier, but it would probably just cover the increases in water, electricity, food and fuel prices. So we stay on square one.

    • JT says:

      09:15pm | 23/03/11

      If you are an able bodied person without mental definiciency, I have no sympathy for you. Why should I? Get a new job? move somewhere less expensive, improve your skillset, improve your education, stop making bad choices in life, in fact it can be all summed up as take responsibility.

      Do that and you’ll be surprised at how quickly you can turn things around. I see however you are a long way from doing that, calling others who have more than you, idiots, assholes, expressing rage at them etc. Right now, you have only yourself to blame.

      Smae goes for The real workers, you are university educated but are working ‘‘low paid jobs’‘? Have you asked yourself why? Was the uni degree you attained worthless in the real world? (arts degree?), you rent a $450 per week home, based on a quick realestate search you can get a 3 bed house for 200 less. You chose to have 3 children. Did you think they were free? I say it again,  take responsibility.

    • The real workers says:

      09:23am | 24/03/11

      @ JT
      Thanks for your opinion, but we DID take responsibility. We had children young and decided at 27 to go back to uni. I studied media and my wife education. Your disdain for the artists of the world does you no favours as a person either. Never watched tv or listened to music?? Typically one would assume it’s a go-nowhere degree, but I have friends earning a hell of a lot more than myself in arts careers. From your attitude and the rest of the community who has proven themselves to be so removed from the reality of ‘making a start’ in 2011, I can assume you’re a baby boomer. You know, the ones who got free education, fuel for 50 cents a litre and could buy a no deposit home in a capital city for around $30 000. You can’t even rent a unit on the Gold Coast for $250 let alone a home so that assertion is false. And we have 2 children not 3, who are the reason we’re trying our best to send them to a great school, in a great safe area as responsible people who are doing our best in the world, albeit struggling financially, but nevertheless not sitting back gloating and criticising from our easy ride and multiple investment portfolio like so many who are simply out of touch with the reality of today’s society.

    • pro fisherman says:

      05:23pm | 23/03/11

      We have certainly come a long way,especialy over the last 25-30yrs.Before that their was no such thing as the working poor,it took one person to work to keep the family home,now two working struggle.This just happening to coincide with globilization,the rise of multinationals,the stock market boom and all the other things that we are told will make us more prosperous.Then theres promises like no child will be living in poverty,we will become the clever country,the smart state and the latest,a boom in green jobs and we keep falling for it as we go down the gurgler.

    • paulie71 says:

      08:34pm | 23/03/11

      Some comments raised the payrise in 2010 that helped recover lost wage rises from the Howard era.

      People who are not living on a minimum wage do not have any real perspective on what it would be like living fro pay to pay, in a job with no security and still struggling to make ends meet (in most cases using high interest credit to close the budget gap).

      Low cost housing is harder to get as states have pretty well given up building public housing and more people in these precarious lifestyles need 2-3 part time jobs to get a full time week of work.

      Some dignity and respect for the lowest paid would not break this country and when people have funds to spend, the economy is helped along as the lowest paid spend a much higher % of their take home wages as opposed to high income earners.

    • Laura says:

      10:21pm | 23/03/11

      Lets not forget Junior wages. I was on one, managing all the accounts for a small buisness full time doing unpaid overtime at age 19 and only getting 75% of the minimum wage. So I was old enough to be a parent but not old enough to be paid like an adult.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter