Competition in corporate Australia has always been fierce.  Everyone wants the best people, systems, products and services.

Photo:Ian Currie.

But behind the smiles and claims to the contrary, everyone from the Chairman down wants to get one up on their direct competitors on every metric that matters. 

At stake are bonuses, bragging rights and most important of all, continued survival in the corporate jungle.

This competitiveness hasn’t been checked at the door when it comes to corporates developing strategies for engaging with Indigenous Australians. 

Contributing to reducing Indigenous disadvantage and having a bigger and better Reconciliation Action Plan is the newest game in town and competition is hot as big business marks out its territory. 

For Indigenous Australia, this is a great thing.  Rivalry will drive corporates to be innovative, develop relationships, attempt to solve complex problems and create new ways of doing business. 

It will also keep everyone on their toes because you know the competition is breathing down your neck trying to leapfrog you the first chance they get. 

Corporates will be forced to stick to their knitting, play to their strengths and do what they do best. 

Cookie cutter, unsustainable cheque book charity will be relegated to scrap heap. Relationships will replace sponsorships and ‘learning by doing’ will become the norm.  Sure there’ll be some mistakes, but not on purpose and rarely the same mistake twice.

But despite the good intentions, another culture clash is in the air and it’s not a clash of traditional Indigenous cultures. 

Rather it’s the result of Governments’ increasing preference to tackle Indigenous issues collaboratively, and the tension that results when natural corporate enemies are asked to work together.

“Working together”, “partnerships” and “coordination” have become the war cries of collaborative Indigenous affairs. 

In the corporate world, collaboration among direct competitors is rare.  Indeed it is often the role of government to regulate against collaboration because it leads to less competition and choice which is bad for consumers. 

Yet there seems to be a growing smorgasbord of government sponsored networks, roundtables, councils, panel discussions, focus groups, think tanks and information sharing days where natural corporate enemies are encouraged to attend and share ideas, contribute feedback and collaborate with each other regarding their Indigenous strategies.

For corporates it’s a surreal experience.  Kinda like being forced to share answers with the kid who hasn’t done their homework while holding hands and singing Kumbayah. It’s supposed to be a good thing, but you still feel icky about it. 

Governments argue that facilitating collaboration opportunities will fast track improvements to corporate Indigenous strategies.  However, what corporates really want is to work with Government to grow their points of difference from their natural enemies.

Indigenous employment is a noticeable exception.  Twiggy Forrest’s ambitious 50,000 jobs target has transformed Indigenous employment into a compliance issue so corporates are currently driven by fear of being left behind.

However natural competitive tension will soon reassert itself and transform Indigenous employment into a more self-serving business outcome.  It will shift from quantity to quality as corporates compete to attract the brightest and the best young Indigenous minds to come, and more importantly stay, in their companies.

Some may decide it’s easier to have lots of Indigenous trainees; other may go straight for Indigenous university graduates; and some may crack the whip on the education system to deliver better educated kids. 

Whatever the case, competition will heat up and social outcomes will merge with sound business principles. As this inevitably gains traction, corporates will become less willing to share their recruitment secrets and competition will replace collaboration. 

One outcome is assured – if you’re a young Indigenous university graduate, you can pretty much name your price, because you are the hottest property around. 

Competition is not a bad thing and neither is collaboration – both have their place.  However, to date fierce competition has been sadly missed from Indigenous affairs as big corporates seeking to invest their significant resources to do good.

For the average Indigenous family the benefits are likely to be many - real jobs, real business opportunities and a toehold in the real economy for starters. 

This may cascade into intergenerational wealth creation opportunities like home ownership. 

Improved health outcomes may even see the 17 year life expectancy gap reduce enough to see most Indigenous Australians live long enough to collect their superannuation cheque.

So with these spoils at stake, let the competition begin and may the best corporate win. I look forward to the innovation and change that will surely come to Indigenous Australians as a result.

Most commented

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ben says:

      06:24am | 12/10/10

      The best person (based on merit alone) should get the job. Heritage, colour, gender, disabled/able-bodied shouldn’t even factor into the thinking.

    • mw says:

      08:45am | 12/10/10

      What if the best people are being systematically denied the opportunity to realise their potential?

    • The Badger says:

      09:54am | 12/10/10

      Interesting you didn’t include age in your factors?
      Says something to me.

    • Tim says:

      12:48pm | 12/10/10

      Badger,
      he didn’t mention height either which has a far more telling correlation to success.

    • The Badger says:

      03:47pm | 12/10/10

      Yes Tim
      Especially if you’re a jockey

    • Mark says:

      07:12am | 12/10/10

      Ben, that’s a nice easy statement to make. What, exactly, is ‘merit’? Are you talking purely about skill set, or are you extending that to cultural fit?
      Organisations - that would be most employers - are societies of people who have to work together. It is nothing like enough simply to look at qualifications or even experience, without considering the individual people themselves. Ultimately, employment is a subjective judgment.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:17am | 12/10/10

      Sincerely wish you , and this fantastic vision of corporate ultruism and magnimity all the best, but I feel that once all the backslapping is over,  things will go back to same old.
      Also as QLD wild rivers show, not all Aboriginal people share the same visions for the future.
      The Aboriginal communities are no more ( or less) united than any other diverse group.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:47am | 12/10/10

      Too true T.Chong (did I just say that!?!) wink

      The wild rivers up here in FNQ is a massive bone of contention - something the govt assumed all indigenous Australians would jump at. 

      The differing opinions and abilities prove to me that the old equity over equality stance taken by the governments is outdated. There is as much opportunity afforded to indigenous people in my region and as with other cultural groups it is their choice to do with it what they wish. It is very difficult to obtain QLD Govt jobs up here as most positions are “identified” or “specified”. There are indigenous only schools. I find the notion of only hiring a person who is indigenous and excluding all other racial groups perplexing. I don’t know what to make of it when I read articles such as this one.

    • Joan says:

      07:48am | 12/10/10

      Heritage, colour, gender, disabled/able-bodied….. may be just the right thing ... the icing on the cake for a particular job…

    • Henry says:

      09:23am | 12/10/10

      I look forward to the day when all Australians born here can be called indigenous - including 6th generation ones like myself!

      The reverse racism we are creating with this absurd two-tier culture beggars belief.

      I applaud you Glen for being a success but please if you are going to call yourself indigenous then I will refer to myself as a Norseman.

    • Jason says:

      10:16am | 12/10/10

      Geln - You know better than anyone that Reconciliation Action Plans have been notoriously difficult for a lot of companies. One big bank which likes to trumpet its’ social responsibility has completely failed to live up to any of the targets within its’ much heralded Reconciliation Action Plan. The plans have given corporate Australia an avenue for claiming social responisbility but the results dont back up the rhetoric.

    • Kate says:

      03:51pm | 12/10/10

      Really enjoyed your blog essay Glen. I hope the picture you paint comes to life.

    • Ben says:

      08:19pm | 12/10/10

      Badger, perhaps I simply didn’t think of it as I was typing.  I am in no way ageist; if you can do the job, then you get the job.  Yes, some positions should be culturally appropriate, in the same way that some positions are better suited to certain genders (e.g. rape counselor).  But those positions would be few and far between (in the grand scheme of thing).  I object to being on interview panels for not one of these jobs, and being told the successful applicant will be Aboriginal before a single resume has been read.

    • John S says:

      07:31am | 13/10/10

      Did I miss the part of the article where you describe what the ‘Aboriginal Australians’ will do to get themselves out of their predicament?  The difficulty with others solving your problems - is that they will get it wrong. We need look no further than the ‘stolen generation’ policy. Remind me how good that imposed solution was for solving ‘Aboriginal disadvantage’? Only you can solve your problem and only if you are willing to pay the price e.g. get an education.

    • Sam Wylie says:

      02:01pm | 14/10/10

      Glen
      I enjoyed you post, and I agree.  Competition is most acute, and works best, when the objective is clearly defined.  In sport the objective is crystal clear, competition is all there is between teams, co-operation is within teams and there is no hiding from failure.  Teams that don’t innovate and are not honest about their weaknesses finish last. 

      In commerce the objective is also fairly clear — create value for shareholders.  Other stakeholders are important.  But there is no hiding from a falling share price.  That share price is a daily vote by the market on the success of your enterprise. 

      When bureaucrats call for “co-operation”  rather than competition, what they really want is no clear metrics of success and failure.  If we all co-operate then who knows which teams are adding value for indigenous communities and which are not.  If we all co-operate then there is complete sharing of the blame when it becomes clear that nothing has actually been done. 

      I agree with you entirely about the need for competition.  Let’s know who is making progress and who is not and let’s reward the successful teams who help Aboriginal people to improve their lot.  The passion for “co-operation’  is really about hiding from accountability.

    • Hazera says:

      07:05pm | 07/02/12

      2500 dallors seems like a small sum of money to be owed for forced labour.  It should not only be about the value of the labour performed but the loss of human dignity as well.Of course they only want to give those that are dead a headstone.  What they refuse to consider is why people of colour continue to remain globally.  For generations we have been unable to pass down wealth through families.  Instead of being able to gain each generation we have remained stagnate.  The simple ability to purchase a home and pass that down to heirs means that each generation will have more opportunities.Renee’s last blog post..

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Hmm, Freudian analyses of the Hangover. Let's call this one When Journalists Take Their Job Too Seriously @smhhttp://t.co/bjy1DIuT8N

Paul Colgan

@patricklion extraordinary

Paul Colgan

Dollar heading for US96c, ASX down heavily, a huge blow to the manufacturing sector with #Ford... grim day.

Malcolm Farr

RT @andrewjbutcher: I hope I never agree to write a press release with a first par as full of nonsensical spin as this one from Ford. http:…

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter