The South Australian election is not over just yet. 

SA Liberal leader Isobel Redmond: straight talk on water and health

Some 20% of votes are yet to be counted and there are three Labor seats which are too close to call.  Bright will most probably be Liberal by the end of the week and Hartley and Newland are still in play.  If all three come to the Liberal Party then Labor will only have 22 seats and will need to do a deal with independents to survive.

We should consider the facts on Saturday night’s result.  There was an eight percent state wide swing to the Liberal Party resulting in approximately 52% of the state wide two party preferred.  There will be at least five new members of the Liberal team, an increase of a third to the Parliamentary team.  Better still the new members including Dan Van Holst Pellekann, Steven Marshall, John Gardner, Tim Whetstone and Rachel Sanderson have genuine talent and will add some real fire power.

On the other hand Labor lost two cabinet ministers and many others had 10 to 15 percent swings against them.  At the next election they will have some six to eight seats under five percent.

Certainly a majority of South Australian voters want a change of government and it may yet be delivered.  South Australians like Isobel Redmond’s straight talk and her plans for water and health.  She ran a very positive campaign about the future whereas Labor tried every negative tactic to try and hold onto the past.

Today the level of desperation in the Labor campaign has been revealed in its full glory.  The shameless con of having Labor booth workers pretend to be Family First workers with a false and misleading how to vote card is nothing short of a disgrace.  As David Nason states in The Australian today “democracy was seriously diminished by this low exercise and those who behind it, should feel ashamed”.  But yet Michael Brown the SA Labor State Secretary was happily accepting it as an authorised Labor tactic this morning on Adelaide radio. 

This type of campaigning has no place in our democracy.  Kevin Rudd should rule out using this tactic at the next Federal election and we should consider legislative change to prevent a similar occurrence in the future.  People were duped and misled in an authorised attempt to change the course of an election.

In this regard it was interesting reading the Bruce Hawker’s analysis on The Punch this morning.  In reading Bruce’s analysis you should remember he was thanked by Mike Rann at least three times on Saturday night for running the Labor campaign in South Australia.  So he has an insight no doubt but it is completely biased.

Bruce spins the Labor line in a typically high quality fashion however the mood in the community is impossible to ignore.  The style of governing through spin and style rather than policy and substance is turning voters off and unless Kevin Rudd realises this he will face the same level of angst as Mike Rann did on Saturday.

Either way it is the end of the Rann era and there will be federal ramifications to this end.  Rann’s ungracious spray on Saturday night revealed a man who knows he is out of time.  But even I was surprised how quickly the factional deal that has survived in South Australian for 16 years fell apart.  Within hours of the booths closing on Saturday, the left’s Jay Weatherill challenged the right’s Kevin Foley for the Deputyship of the Party and in doing so made not so subtle comments about the bullying style that is a hallmark of the senior leadership of the Labor Party.

This is the beginning of what will be a bloodbath in the State Labor Party as the right seek to reassert their dominance over the left and vice versa.  The challenges of water, health and the economy will be put to one side while the factions fight out who will become the next Labor Party leader.

Unfortunately for South Australians if Labor does sneak over the line, the famous Mungo MacCallum expression on politics in Australia will be proved correct again - Liberal governments get thrown out one election early and Labor governments get one election too many.

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John A Neve says:

      02:08pm | 22/03/10

      Jamie,

      Reading your article reinforces the view that all pollies are tared with the same brush. “The shameless con of having Labor booth workers pretend to be Family First workers”.  Came on Jamie, would you like me to list some of the liberal parties stunts?

      Tell us Jamie, what is it with you people, don’t the Australian voters deserve better than all this party B*** S***?  Are you trying to tell us the Liberals do no wrong? What real contribution have you and those like you ever made to this country?

      Bricklayers lay bricks, plumbers run pipes, doctors cure people, what do people like you do for us in a meaningfull sense?

    • Ryan says:

      02:33pm | 22/03/10

      @John A Neve: “Came on Jamie, would you like me to list some of the liberal parties stunts?” yes actually!

    • Bek says:

      07:24am | 23/03/10

      John what Labor did on the weekend was absolutely unacceptable - they cheated to win. Which shouldn’t really surprise any of us out of a Rann government. If you can list when the SA Liberals did something similar and were allowed to get away with it I’m all ears buddy.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:53am | 23/03/10

      Ryan & Bek,

      Do the pair of you have difficullty reading?  No where have I mentioned SA or the “weekend”.
      This is our countrie’s problem, people like you see only what they want to see, you live in fantasy land.

    • persephone says:

      02:11pm | 22/03/10

      Calling Redmond fat is a bit harsh!

      She looks quite svelte in the photo.

    • Pat Ryan says:

      02:17pm | 22/03/10

      Ranns Labor team are bloody disgracefull.If there so ho hum about useing dodgy how to vote cards treating voters as morons .makes you think what else have they done

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      02:25pm | 22/03/10

      Don’t blame me, I voted Liberal! ! ! !

    • hughie says:

      02:53pm | 22/03/10

      Same old result for SA Libs.  Great on the two party preferred, lousy on the marginal seat campaigns.  Who cares what people voted in Port Adelaide or Salisbury - “50 States” style campaigns don’t work here.

      Yes, Hawker is an odious toad, but he fights the only way that will lead to winning.  The Liberal Party needs its own Bruce Hawker.

    • Saskia says:

      04:02pm | 22/03/10

      Wasn’t real impressed with your interview on Saturday night Jamie.  You needed to take things a bit more seriously and convey a more positive and determined outlook as to the election result.  Isobel did a great job and SA wanted the Liberals.

      You should have shown more respect to these voters. 

    • cityboy @ Sydney says:

      04:24pm | 22/03/10

      Are Family First voter so feeble-minded as to religiously follow the ‘how to vote’ card handed out by pseudo FF volunteers? Maybe they are.
      Considering they only garner about 1% of the statewide vote how effective would this little deception be? You would need someone at every booth in every electorate statewide, and 100% complient voting to influence the end result in any meaningful way!
      As Alice said: “It gets curiouser and curiouser!”

    • matt says:

      04:44pm | 22/03/10

      Yes, they are.

      Want to know just how stupid? Two words - Steve Fielding.

    • Formersnag & swinging voter says:

      06:02pm | 22/03/10

      it just goes to show how desperate the red/green/labour conspiracy was to grab even 1 or 2 votes. I have seen the same person registered at 3 different addresses, but that was more about branch stacking, which was rife in QLD at the time & in that area.

      i have also met labour staffers at polling booths proudly boasting about groups of them, driving around in a bus, to all booths in an electorate & voting at every 1 of them. in knife edge, marginal electorates a few dozen votes is all it would take.

      Get all “Polly” staff stooges or “Galahs” off the net.

    • cityboy @ Sydney says:

      05:13pm | 22/03/10

      Gotta agree with that matt!!  (I was just trying to be a little kind…...!)

    • Tom says:

      05:16pm | 22/03/10

      Well I can think of twice the Liberal Party has fudged election material and I’m sure there are many more, so don’t get on your high horse too quickly Jamie. We had Jackie Kelly distributing false material at the 2007 Federal election and the WA Libs at the last State election distributing misleading Greens material. Were those ‘shameless cons’ as well Jamie?

    • Louisa says:

      09:50pm | 22/03/10

      Tom - You stated “We had Jackie Kelly distributing false material at the 2007 Federal election:

      That is not true. Perhaps you may wish to rephrase or correct your comment.

    • Front Man says:

      05:36pm | 22/03/10

      Only question: If it wasn’t meant to be misleading, why did it look so much like Family First?
      It’s like asking why those copy watches in Bali have Rolex on the face, I guess.

    • Bruce says:

      08:20pm | 22/03/10

      Ah ! State elections. The elections you have when you want to punish the Federal government.

    • Daniel says:

      07:46am | 23/03/10

      Where were the Greens in the SA elections. In Sydney all we heard about was the Tasmanian Greens. how did they go in SA?

    • Barry says:

      11:32am | 23/03/10

      I must say I loathe Family First and their policies….BUT what the SA Labor party did on Saturday with the fake how-to-vote cards was un-Australian and a disgrace,  and they should be punished accordingly.  The fact that they don’t believe they did anything wrong just goes to show the hubris shown by this Rann-led team.  I agree Jamie; this practice needs to be outlawed before the next election.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter