Julia Gillard has teared up while heaping praise on America as the beacon of hope for humanity and the nation that can do anything it sets its mind on. You can watch the full speech here.

Like a glowing ember. Pic: AFP

Only the fourth Australian PM to deliver a speech to a joint sitting of the US Congress, Ms Gillard charmed her audience which was bolstered with numerous school children and Congressional aides, drawing 16 sustained rounds of applause in all - two of which lasted into minutes, and six of which were standing ovations.

The delighted response came as the Australian leader repeatedly told US lawmakers that Australia stood with them, through thick and thin, war and peace, boom-time and recession.

“You have a true friend down under,” she told the packed House of Representatives in the Capitol.

“Americans can do anything,” she said laying on compliments as thickly as any Australian prime minister has. “There is a reason the world always looks to America. Your great dream, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, inspires us all.”

Time and again, she stroked the American ego, stressing Australia’s undying loyalty, unstinting support and unflinching one-ness on everything from security matters, to economic issues and cultural values. Recalling her feelings when she watched the lunar landing in 1969, she said it was the moment she concluded, Americans can do anything.

The speech sought to elevate Australia/America relations to perhaps their closest level ever, and it was a move that clearly pleased its audience. But did she go too far?

Some Australians might not feel quite so dewy-eyed about America. Some will see her appropriation of her former political enemy, John Howard as disingenuous. Ditto with her glowing praise for the cold-war warrior and darling of the American Right, Ronald Reagan.

It was hard not to conclude Ms Gillard was engaging in a bit of over-compensation - that she was maybe too determined to assuage any fears she was “of” the left.

Critics will likely point to the lack of any serious reference to America’s divergent interests, its failure to show leadership on climate change, its bungled war efforts in Iraq (which Labor had opposed), its crippling addiction to debt, and its abject failure to properly regulate its finance sector which in turn laid the conditions for the GFC.

While none of these problems would or should have been raised in such a speech, it was that they did not even exist in the background that stood out. And most jarring of all was the sense pervading the speech that America and Americans somehow represent the best there is in humanity - the highest point. For an Australian prime minister, leaving such an impression would surely not be a winner at home.

The fulsome rhetorical flourish reached its crescendo as Ms Gillard’s voice began to waver at the end of the 30 minute address, causing some Congressional eyes to moisten as well.

This year you have marked the centenary of President Ronald Reagan’s birth. He remains a great symbol of American optimism. The only greater symbol of American optimism is America itself.

“The eyes of the world are still upon you. Your city on the hill cannot be hidden. Your brave and free people have made you the masters of recovery and reinvention.

“As I stand before you in this, this cradle of democracy, I see a nation that has changed the world and known remarkable days. I firmly believe you are the same people who amazed me when I was a small girl by landing on the moon.

“On that great day I believed Americans could do anything. I believe that still. You can do anything today.”

It is in the nature of such goodwill addresses to be generous. And while Ms Gillard may have taken the praise thing a few steps too far, she will get away with it. She has far bigger problems than being seen as too close to the Americans.

But for a politician already criticised for flip-flopping and for standing for nothing, her surprisingly enthusiastic embrace of the American ideal will do little to make her look more grounded. Besides, imagine the reaction if John Howard had said these things?

160 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • nene granadillos says:

      11:15am | 10/03/11

      Go Julia! It makes me proud to be an Australian!

    • Matt says:

      11:22am | 10/03/11

      You’re kidding right? What a disgusting display.

    • john says:

      11:24am | 10/03/11

      @Matt I thought she gave an excellent speech to make us all proud. What was wrong with it that you thought it was a disgusting display?

    • FelictyC says:

      11:27am | 10/03/11

      @Matt - cuckoo, cuckoo,cuckoo

    • matt says:

      11:51am | 10/03/11

      ok ok a bit over the top, but a bit gushing don’t you think? May as well of just given everyone a BJ…

    • MarK says:

      12:02pm | 10/03/11

      Just to get this right Felicity you are an enthusiastic and non conditional supporter of the US then?

    • AJ says:

      12:36pm | 10/03/11

      Imagine if Tony Abbott had delivered that speech. Every lefty journo and rusted on Labor supporter would have been screaming their collective lungs out. Remember the outcry when Howard was PM about how close we were to the US. This speech makes Howard look like a lightweight.

      I also read that she was open to more American troops being stationed in Aus. Can you believe that! And hardly a murmur from the press. How not surprising.

      One rule for the Libs and another for the ALP in this country.

    • john says:

      12:41pm | 10/03/11

      @matt, I think congress liked the speech so much because, I think USA has been though alot with wars in the middle-east since 1991, the GFC, 9-11, foreign debt, and fear of a rising china. As a true friend should now and then, take a friend by the hand and pat them on the back and say its OK nothing to fear.

      She gave them strength by reminding them they could do anything.

      ...and right now more than anything its a real- not a fake friend the USA needs more.

      Julia shined and it was her moment, its a great speech she deserves the credit for it.

      Once she gets back to Australia, she’ll get a reality check.

    • rufus says:

      01:16pm | 10/03/11

      ‘Screaming their collective lungs out’? Don’t mind the clumsy, exaggerated metaphor, do you. AJ?

      I was never a supporter of the Howard ‘all the way with the USA’ line. I don’t support Gillard continuing it, either. I haven’t screamed about it yet, though.

    • poa says:

      02:58pm | 10/03/11

      Apparently hardly anybody bothered to turn up, so they got a whole heap of juniour staffers etc to fill in. Empty seats in the US. Empty promises at home.
      And she borrowed the speech from Bono.
      Empty head as well.

    • Sandy says:

      03:16pm | 10/03/11

      poa
      A man with an empty head thinks everyone has an empty head.

    • Vince says:

      03:20pm | 10/03/11

      @AJ - “Imagine if Tony Abbott had delivered that speech.”

      But that’s the point, isn’t it?  He wouldn’t.  He can’t.  He doesn’t have that ability.  That’s why he is ultimately the lessor of the two.  He’s nothing but a wrecker and couldn’t inspire a dog to chase a stick.

    • acotrel says:

      03:41pm | 10/03/11

      @AJ
      ‘Imagine if Tony Abbott had delivered that speech.’

      I simply cannot imagine it.  What would the Yanks think of us then?

    • acotrel says:

      03:45pm | 10/03/11

      @Rufus. It wasn’t ‘all the way with the USA’!  It was all the way with LBJ, and Harold Holt said it when our youth were being sent to Vietnam to die for the paranoid anti-communist cause!

    • Andoo25 says:

      03:56pm | 10/03/11

      Sounds like AJ liked it

    • John says:

      04:04pm | 10/03/11

      Vince – are you saying Gillard is inspiring?

      The article is right – If Howard started fawning about moon landings, he’d be called an arselicker.

      The only reason she’s there making the speech at all is because of the relationship we have with the US.  That’s due in no small part to the work and ability of Howard.

      I guess the speech was ok.  Wonder if Bob Brown checked it.

      And she should leave the footy at home next time.

    • acotrel says:

      04:09pm | 10/03/11

      What doesn’t make me proud to be Australian, is the bitter poisonous crap being spouted by the conservatives on this topic!

    • danny donaldson says:

      05:22pm | 10/03/11

      My earliest memories are of Julia being a young rusted on America hating marxist- conspiring with the unions to bring the dreaded socialism/communism to the ex workers paradise downunder.
      We avoided it then, alas now it has a hold much tighter. And i mean ex workers paradise!

      Just what is this with all this university inspired American hatred?
      Just what are those idiot maoist professors telling the kids, bloody disgraceful behaviour from them, should stick to teaching facts; not their own commo dogma.
      Tell me this what was the last commie movie you watched, the last commie computer you owned, the last commie car you drove the last marxist song you heard on the radio.

      BTW Just who when and why airbrushed Julias early history from all places of reference. Its as though she never existed.

      Time for all of us to think a bit about this red headed shiela.

    • Christian Real says:

      06:54pm | 10/03/11

      It is time for you redneck liberals to give credit, where credit is due, the Prime Minister’s speech in Washington was superb and she done us proud.
      Can just imagine Abbott standing there blank faced and nodding his head up and down.

    • Rosie says:

      08:16pm | 10/03/11

      Kidding yourself, the woman couldn’t be more insipid. She played right into the hands of an Americian audience. The only thing Gillard does very well and got away with it! Only the Yanks!

    • Reg says:

      08:37pm | 10/03/11

      FelicityC “cuckoo, cuckoo,cuckoo”

      MarK; “Just to get this right Felicity you are an enthusiastic and non conditional supporter of the US then?”

      What has this got to do with a cuckoo or the US, let alone the wild-eyed extension into unconditional anything? Nothing more than a weak attempt to label Felicity to suit your inner voice MarK. Cuckoo is certainly the right term.

    • Leigh says:

      09:48pm | 10/03/11

      channelled Howard? that’s a bit lazy Mark Kenny.

      She has plagiarised a speech by Bono back in 2006 getting allweepy about moon landings and childhood.

      Maybe when Bono gave her an ipod he left copies of all his best sermons to try and inspire her.  Probably didn’t expect her to just copy them though….

      Acotrel, get over it champ, you think she’s wonderful, the rest of us think she’s a fraud.

    • Gregg says:

      01:40am | 11/03/11

      @accadacca,
      ” What doesn’t make me proud to be Australian, is the bitter poisonous crap being spouted by the conservatives on this topic! “

      I’m so pleased acotrel, not so much about what you might claim but the hypocrisy you display as all you lefties do.
      Talk of calling the kettle black!

      As for the speech, haven’t heard anymore of it other than the US landed man on the moon when she was a kid but back to the future and reality and really what would one expect other than good things to be said about the US and what really would you expect the response to be!

      She sure wasn’t going to come out and talk to them with any honesty about her idea of camaigning/leadership and her own inconsistency nor her role in disposing of a sitting PM of her own party, one she had expressed the utmost support for.

      She takes a football to Obama and is there not some irony to her also having claimed last year that there was as much chance of her being PM as there was of her being fullforward for the Bulldogs!

      She is a fraud and it matters nought what she puts into any speech when she is a self confessed flip flop who cannot be trusted.

    • acotrel says:

      06:50am | 11/03/11

      I wonder about Julia’s comment about Ronnie Raygun?  Was she just being nice to someone who suffered from dementia?

    • Reg says:

      08:04am | 11/03/11

      I think she had as a main goal the wish to engender greater unity in a country that is being so dreadfully divided by Republican forces. This would certainly be in the long term interests of Australia and the world. After-all mediation is her forte, no matter how frantically the Aussie right-wingers squirm and squeal.  smile

      And Port Macquarie is SUCH a boring hole.

    • Elphaba says:

      11:21am | 10/03/11

      I thought it was an excellent speech.  better than I’ve heard most Aussie pollies give.

      But just ask Barack Obama how far pretty speeches get you.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:33am | 10/03/11

      I thought it was good too and I think she did really well.

      Julia and Barack are pushing the same piece of shit up the same hill with the same stick. They popularity is low, they have limited control of their respective houses etc etc. Of course they are going to be palsy and of course Barack will be seeking to promote her in a favourable light.

      That aside though (and even with the tears) I think that speach was emotive, relevant and well presented. She did good and she didn’t make me half cringe like she did on her first trip OS. Good luck to her I say, but this is hardly going to turn the volume down on the music that she will be facing when she steps of the private jet on home soil.

    • Joan says:

      12:16pm | 10/03/11

      It was Juliar in full form . .  Dressed in red she harked back to the good old Cold War days when she was a commie in the Socialist Forum , she switched on full saccharine , using the very same choke rehearsed only just recently in parliament as she snivelled about the man on the moon and capped it all with ~ `Real mates talk straight` straight from the liars mouth…. Yep here in Australia we know all about your type of straight talk Juliar.

    • Vaunted says:

      02:26pm | 10/03/11

      No caustic rhetoric, no endlessly repeated group-think slogans, this was the genuine, the REAL Julia all right. I think. Or maybe not.

    • Jade says:

      02:50pm | 10/03/11

      @ Vaunted… but how do you know? There are so many Julia’s I am losing count wink

    • Smat says:

      03:15pm | 10/03/11

      The White House? Not good enough?

    • acotrel says:

      03:49pm | 10/03/11

      @Joan
      ‘Do you get your vitriol from Farbenfabrik Bayer along with the Zyklon B ?

    • CABAL says:

      04:22pm | 10/03/11

      @acotrel’s comment

      Bahahahahaahaha HA

      (good old Godwin’s Law)

    • Joan says:

      07:35pm | 10/03/11

      Acotrel…. there`s a sucker born everyday and politicians count on people like you. Gillard wasn’t even eight years old when man landed on the moon….. don’t believe anyone was running around Australia saying ` Americans can do anything… except it would seem our Juliar growing up in her left-wing family. Were there people snivelling as they watched the moon landing?? I think not… people marvelled at what was now possible.  Now 2011 and Australian PM snivells as she talks about a moon landing…. weird .  real weird.

    • Reg says:

      08:25pm | 10/03/11

      Cabal; When did this ever become a law?  And under which jurisdiction?

      “Godwin’s law (also known as Godwin’s Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin’s Law of Nazi Analogies)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] which has become an Internet adage.”

      It’s nothing more than an attempt to curb discussion about the most horrific occurrence in recent history. As such it represents a continuation of the Nazi propaganda machine that was supposed to have died with Goebbels. Nothing to be proud or frivolous about really. See that word humourous, it means you’re talking shit.

    • nanna from vyle bay says:

      11:31am | 10/03/11

      Your comment
      :Julia Gillard did a great job crawling up the Yanks.
      But are the Yanks worth anything to anyone?

    • Banana from vile bay says:

      12:45pm | 10/03/11

      You’d be speaking Japanese or Mandarin if the Yanks weren’t around.
      And your pommie mates with be speaking German
      konichiwa

    • Patrick says:

      01:01pm | 10/03/11

      With a 14 trillion dollar GDP and the most powerful military in the world by far, I’d say the Yanks are worth quite a bit to quite a few people, it probably isn’t a bad idea to be in their good books, even with all the problems they face today.

    • Lucius says:

      01:30pm | 10/03/11

      @Banana from vile bay

      Yeah instead of speaking Japanese or Mandarin, we are now one of the most obese countries in the world with a McDonalds on every corner, half of the white population of Australia would fit in well with the KKK, and we have multitudes of American-inspired reality TV programs and an obsession with American drug addict celebrities.

      But its okay, have another Big Mac, after you lift up your fat rolls to hold your penis to pee,  you’re not fat you’re just “big boned”.

    • Mac says:

      02:55pm | 10/03/11

      Lucius: after you lift up your fat rolls to hold your penis to pee - clearly from experience!

    • acotrel says:

      03:53pm | 10/03/11

      @Banana
      Is that why all those Yank soldiers were in town when I was a kid?
      If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas, but I love my dog!

    • acotrel says:

      03:59pm | 10/03/11

      @Lucius do you make it a habit of blaming others for problems of your own making?  Nobody forces you to eat Macca’s! Nobody forces you to use Boeing aeroplanes, or IBM computers with Microsoft software either! It’s all just too easy, you just press the power button, and it all just happens?

    • Nonmus says:

      04:14pm | 10/03/11

      Er Lucius, if you spoke to my Nanna like that I’d be really ticked off. Do you have no manners? You don’t have to be vile, hateful, crude and despicable to make a point old son, unless you’re a rabid lefty of course. In fact on reflection I’ll forgive you because your comment says a lot more about you than it does about Nanna or Yanks or anyone else. PS you might take a trip through the islands and count the young American WWII dead, died saving Australia. Speaking of bigoted, you don’t do a bad impression yourself, and nobody crams Maccas down anyone’s neck, they do it to themselves. You make me ashamed.

    • Justin says:

      11:32am | 10/03/11

      I think you’ll find that she was recalling Bono’s feelings when he watched the lunar landing.

      Cheesy speech, but that’s what the Americans want to hear.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      01:17pm | 10/03/11

      Not sure what the Greeks would say about the US being the ‘‘cradle of democracy’’

    • Justin says:

      01:39pm | 10/03/11

      I’m sure the Greeks would be appalled, but then they’re not the audience.

      Gillard’s problem is that the secondary audience (Australia) doesn’t seem to be reacting very well. Barry Cassidy was talking about Howard’s 3 point bounce after his speech to congress & wondered if it would be repeated. I’m thinking it may actually go the other way. The comments on the SMH piece were at least 3 to 1 against (probably closer to 4 or 5 to 1) & every where else it’s even stronger. The faceless men may be lurking again shortly.

    • Mac says:

      03:41pm | 10/03/11

      Justin do you actually read the blogs on newspapers as a representative selection of the people? Firstly, only those who work in offices can post. Secondly, only those who work for someone else would be bothered to post. Thirdly, the way most blogs read, the article is forgotten and it’s just a slinging match. One side has more people who can be bothered posting because of a born to rule mentality. Just the way it is. Would be surprised if you could point to ANY blog with a Labor advantage in the posts.

    • Justin says:

      04:37pm | 10/03/11

      Mac, thanks for your wonderful insight. Don’t know where I’d be without it. Probably exactly where I am.

      Meanwhile, you may recall the blog post reaction to the carbon tax announcement which was followed up by a rather large shift in the polls that reflected that reaction. How odd.

      SMH is usually fairly down the middle in the comments. Not today.

      I’m guessing you’ve never looked at Crikey’s comments?

      Work for myself by the way.

      Your office worker comment is valid though.

    • Rob says:

      09:38pm | 10/03/11

      @Banana.U.S. participation WW1 6-4-1917 to 11-11-1918.U.S. participation WW2 8-12-41 to 13-9-1945.If your septic mates had started or at least come of the bench when needed maybe the ‘‘games’’ would have finished earlier.When they do start, it’s ‘‘I’m quarterback or I’m not playing.’‘Guten nacht!

    • Dr B S Goh says:

      11:37am | 10/03/11

      We should all be proud of our PM performance in US Congress.

      Our FM Rudd was selling uranium in UAE so that UAE with huge gas reserves can have a Nuclear Power Station by 2017.

      The ALP and Greens Ideology on Nuclear Energy for Australia is really hypocritical. If it is so dangerous why sell to a Middle East country. One day there may be revolutions and the nuclear material may fall into hands of terrorist.

      Why turn Australia into a third rate country in Nuclear Energy. Tunisia with 10m people and quite poor plans to have two nuclear stations by 2019. France gets 80% of its electricity from Nuclear Energy.

    • Dr. BS Staye says:

      12:47pm | 10/03/11

      What party supports Nuclear Energy Dr BS?
      Certainly not the LNP.
      Perhaps One Nation does - Go check their website for policy.

    • acotrel says:

      06:56am | 11/03/11

      France also has COMPETENT ENGINEERS!

    • Ripa says:

      11:39am | 10/03/11

      From one Marxist to another, you really cant go wrong.
      Did she suggest America should move itself forward?

    • Just Sayin' says:

      12:46pm | 10/03/11

      Yes we can.  Sorry, I mean: Yes she did.

    • pC says:

      01:11pm | 10/03/11

      didn’t Obama already say that?

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:49am | 10/03/11

      Gillard and the Greens. Hard to tell the bigger hypocrite.

    • Damien says:

      11:50am | 10/03/11

      and to think, only 7 years from the party led by a man who said the immortal words, ‘conga line of suckholes’. how times change (or perhaps, how times change when you’re the one in charge).

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      02:28pm | 10/03/11

      Ahhhhh. What a great moment in Australian politics that was.

    • Max Redlands says:

      11:56am | 10/03/11

      is it true she virtually quoted Bono (Bono?!?!) verbatim when reminiscing about the moon landing?

      has this woman no clue at all?

    • Nadia says:

      12:17pm | 10/03/11

      I dont think Bono claimed he was a small girl

    • Scarneck says:

      12:33pm | 10/03/11

      That is true Max….they edited out her rendition of “I still haven’t found what I’m looking for”

    • NO new world order says:

      12:00pm | 10/03/11

      I notice she threw in a nice ‘new world order’ reference for her globalist masters. What a traitor to Australia and a puppet.

    • Mick In The Hills says:

      12:01pm | 10/03/11

      The Greens and lefty types will be grinding their teeth over Gillard’s suck-up to the (Republican) US Congress.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      02:04pm | 10/03/11

      He he.

    • Mac says:

      02:56pm | 10/03/11

      Good! Hope the Greenies are grinding

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:21pm | 10/03/11

      Considering that Australia borrows heavily from China and China is our main market, she should be in Beijing, sucking up to the oligarchy that runs it.

    • ZSRenn says:

      05:06pm | 10/03/11

      @ Shane Please don’t use big words if you do not know the meaning of them or what you are talking about. An oligarchy is government by a small number of people.

      This hardly describes China’s political system composed of thousands of members and of 9 political parties.

      But you’re right she should be sucking up to China. The states is going down the tube it is trillions in debt, each state has it’s own monitory problems and with the disparity of wealth that that creates makes them a possible oligarchy with so few rich leading so may poor.

    • S Morris says:

      12:24pm | 10/03/11

      a total embarrassment. She is a fawning middle management zombie. I was aghast that her gifts to Obamalama were a mix cd of aussie music and a sherrin football. That sums up her stupidity and lack of respect for her office. Surely a dozen of the best aussie wines and books by contemporary aussie authors? She is a bogan abroad.  When her term is finally up maybe a trainee job in the australian tourist board would suit. Her cringeworthy ‘performance’ was more a try-out for the US dinner speech circuit when she’s voted out. Idiot.

    • Erick says:

      02:24pm | 10/03/11

      Just look at Obama’s gifts to Britain - an iPod loaded with his own speeches to the Queen, and a Wal-Mart collection of DVDs to Gordon Brown, who is going blind.

      Gillard is simply living up to the standards set by Obama himself.

    • Martin Hopes says:

      03:22pm | 10/03/11

      “cringeworthy”?  What a pity Tony Abbott will never get the chance to do the same - Now that would be ‘absolute’ cringe. I personally thought the idea of an Aussie rules football was a great idea.

    • Vince says:

      03:56pm | 10/03/11

      “Obamalama” - is that, like, witty or something?

    • acotrel: says:

      04:07pm | 10/03/11

      @Martin Hopes
      Every sane Nazi knows Tony Abbott coulda dun it bedda?

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      04:19pm | 10/03/11

      @Vince - youtube the Obama Llama song.

    • Mayday says:

      04:22pm | 10/03/11

      Bogan abroad….....I love that, a new reality tv show perhaps?

    • neil says:

      12:34pm | 10/03/11

      It was like watching a train wreck you don’t want to look but you can’t turn away, what a cringe fest. And off course the Yanks were applauding, Gillard couldn’t blow anymore smoke up their arse if she tried.

      What is it with her accent? Australians just don’t sound like that, the woman is an embarrassment.

    • Jade says:

      01:21pm | 10/03/11

      I agree 100% Neil.  Its very embarrassing.

    • Semi Precious not green stone says:

      02:21pm | 10/03/11

      I disagree 100% Neil. It was very uplifting.

    • acotrel says:

      04:35pm | 10/03/11

      @jade.  If you want to hear ‘embarassing’, wait until you hear Tony Abbott’s comment about Julia’s speech!  Should be on tonight’s TV News? Bet he shoots himself in the foot!

    • Just Sayin' says:

      12:43pm | 10/03/11

      She said:

      “As I stand before you in this, this cradle of democracy…”

      America is a ‘cradle of democracy’?  Since when?  I’m pretty sure they inherited their democratic systems from the british and french.  And it’s not like the british and the french invented democracy either, the Greeks were democratic about 2200 years before America even existed, and the Sumerians even before that.

      If you’re going to heap lavish praise upon your friends, the least you can do is ensure it is at least slightly based in reality.

      But at least she didn’t salute the US President, unlike her un-democratically deposed predecessor.

    • Mac says:

      03:07pm | 10/03/11

      The referendum of 1958 approved the constitution of the Fifth Republic of France. The Westminster system operates in Australia and the United Kingdom. The absolute separation of powers between the executive, the judiciary and the legislature are a very important part of American Democracy.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_government_of_the_United_States
      When the system was set up in 1789, it was one of the first modern national constitutional republics in the world (Wikipedia). I was taught this in school in the 1980’s.

      But yes, the basis did come from ancient Greece.

    • Just Sayin' says:

      04:10pm | 10/03/11

      Seperation of powers?  That would be Montiesquieu’s doctrine of the seperation of powers.  (France, 1689-1755).

      I know the US has a slightly different form of democracy to everyone else, but everyone has a slightly different form of democracy to everyone else.  That hardly makes the US a cradle of democracy.

      And yes, I did see the unreferenced line in your link “The government was formed in 1789, making the United States one of the world’s first, if not the first, modern national constitutional republic”

      “... on of the world’s first, if not the first…” doesn’t exactly reek of thorough research.  Weasel words if ever I saw them.

      I’d accept a “creche of modern democracy” or “cradle of constitutional republics”, but “cradle of democracy” is absurd.

    • Against the Man says:

      12:49pm | 10/03/11

      She is like a Porsche without an engine. Looks impressive but it isn’t going anywhere. Remember empty vessels make the most noise….........the poll numbers say it all…...........

    • Pollster says:

      02:09pm | 10/03/11

      Especially when polls look at who is the preferred Prime Minister.

    • Mayday says:

      02:26pm | 10/03/11

      Pollie wants a cracker

    • Pollster says:

      03:19pm | 10/03/11

      Not long to go now mayday
      Another month and a half and you’ll have you day.

    • Ian says:

      12:51pm | 10/03/11

      Standing oviations everywhere, from a bunch of seat warmers as she drones on and on and on. Fabulous stuff. Only in Amerca as they say.

    • John says:

      01:05pm | 10/03/11

      It amazes me that the Liberal Rightards (or should it be Retards) are lining up to denigrate Gillard’s speech to Congress. She was articulate genuine. I wonder what Abbott would have said? He would go down the same path but add a few “Ah’s”. Then his idiotic fans would rave about his statesmanlike qualities.
      I am sure it grates with the Liberal fan club that Gillard did so well. I, for one, am happy it is causing a reaction in that it shows Australians how small minded these people are and irrelevant to boot. It hurts, doesn’t it?

    • Just Sayin' says:

      01:38pm | 10/03/11

      Yep, everyone that disagrees with you is retarded.  Is it lonely up there on your pedastal?

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      02:05pm | 10/03/11

      @John: How do you know she was genuine? Seriously, the rest of us are having a bit of difficulty figuring out when she’s telling the truth, so you appear to have a gift the rest of us lack. Maybe we just haven’t seen her tell the truth often enough to recognise the signs?

      Can you tell if it was the real Julia, too? I ask because there now seems to be quite a growing number of Julias -there’s the one who is a socialist, the one who isn’t a socialist, the one who thought Kevin Rudd was her bestest friend, the one who knifed him in the back, the strong one who could see first hand the destruction wrought by floods and storms without a murmur, the soft one who gets teary just thinking about America’s first moon landing (eh?),  the one who said there’d be no carbon tax, the one who said we’re having a carbon tax, etc, etc.

    • JKM says:

      02:52pm | 10/03/11

      @John: why do you assume Gillard critics are default Abbott supporters?

    • ian f says:

      04:17pm | 10/03/11

      John really genuine are you kidding look back at her history of socialism against all thing American, after that how can her speech be genuuine your kidding right! Coz i suspect she is

    • Just Sayin' says:

      04:35pm | 10/03/11

      @JKM - One can only assume that John is from the George W Bush school of politics.  If they ain’t for us, they’re against us.

    • Christian Real says:

      07:02pm | 10/03/11

      John,
      Tony Abbott would most likely had said, ” Don’t believe everything I say “, and he would most likely have added: ” The statements that need to be taken absolutely as the gospel truth are those carefully prepared scripted remarks. ”

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      10:13am | 12/03/11

      @ChristianReal: I know what you’re saying, and I wholeheartedly agree with you. Tony Abbott does try really hard to be absolutely honest with us, even going as far as to admit that he’ll get it wrong sometimes. You really know where you stand with him.

      There’s no way Gillard would be so frank and honest - it just isn’t in her nature. Let’s face it, half politician, half lawyer - she’s qualified to bend the truth twice!

    • brian m says:

      01:10pm | 10/03/11

      She was talking to the Yanks, not to us, so of course the language and the message is going to be different. A bit cringeworthy but hey, by this time tomorrow they’ll have forgotten that she was even there.

    • Muzz says:

      01:26pm | 10/03/11

      This should fix everything, standing ovations, the works….what carbon tax?  what lie? Fixed.

    • Zac de Spudnut says:

      01:33pm | 10/03/11

      How is that “Hopey Changey Taxy” for ya?

    • Zac de Spudnut says:

      02:54pm | 10/03/11

      Sorry folks it should read…... How is that Hopey Changey Taxy going for ya?

    • Doh nut says:

      05:08pm | 10/03/11

      Are you sure it wasn’t supposed to say
      that “Hockey Changey Taxi going for you?
      makes as much sense.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      06:52pm | 10/03/11

      What sort of intellectual lightweight quotes Sara Palin for effect?

    • Sag says:

      01:40pm | 10/03/11

      Cringe-worthy!
      I also heard that the the staff from offices etc were ordered in the chamber to give a full attendance image.

    • really says:

      03:20pm | 10/03/11

      really.. you have contacts in the White House which confirm this..?

    • neil says:

      04:13pm | 10/03/11

      ABC news 24 reported that only about 30% of senators showed up and the chamber was filled with various govt employees and Aust embassy personnel

    • Paul C says:

      04:16pm | 10/03/11

      Even Kim Beazley was there - He took up a few seats.

    • John L says:

      01:42pm | 10/03/11

      The speech was so sycophantic and fawning Im not sure if it was written by John Howard or Mark Arbib

    • Miki says:

      06:09pm | 10/03/11

      I’m sure Mark Arbib is delighted with her. Keeping Arbib happy is part of any Labor leader’s job description, as Kevin Rudd could testify.
      It was a nauseating display, but did anyone really expect anything different?

    • Warwick says:

      01:46pm | 10/03/11

      i am a great admirer of the American nation and the American people,but I found this speech cringe-making. As Just Sayin points out, ancient Greece (which was nothing like the present, Turkic, Greece) was the cradle of democracy. Modern democracy was developed in Britain and France. How could our PM be so ignorant?

      And she paid homage to Ronald Reagan? The ALP loathe Ronald Reagan. Friends speak then the truth to each other? Then our PM should have said, “Amongst Australians in general, and amongst my party in particular, anti-Americanism is rampant. But don’t mind, I believe that you Americans can do anything;  not only did I see Americans walking on the moon; I read very many Superman comics. I am convinced that the normal laws of nature don’t apply to you.”

    • Mac says:

      03:14pm | 10/03/11

      Depends on what kind of democracy Waz - Both France and Britain were ruled by royalty when American’s constitution was adopted in 1787. This set out the system of government as a republic. The revolution in France was in 1789 and even that did not introduce democracy. Try 1958 for the Fifth French Republic’s constitution. Britain still ruled by a Queen and their Westminster system doesn’t contain the same separation of powers - of the three, who’s is the true representative system? Who is ignorant??

    • Mac says:

      03:35pm | 10/03/11

      Sorry, Waz, but who is ignorant? Britain and France? I hope you are joking….surely…you are? French revolution was 1789…does the phrase “Let them eat cake” ring any bells? Fairly famous in that unrepresentative monarchy at the time. Try 1958 for the current constitution of the Fifth Republic of France. Britain, still to this day led by a Queen as head of state, using a Westminster system where the executive branch of government MUST be part of the legislature. In the USA, (system of government outlined in the constitution adopted in 1787…before French Revolution…the separation of powers is absolute. The representative legislature acts as a checks and balance on the executive….so Workchoices could not have happened via a rampant executive like it did here in our British, Westminster system. So, either you were clearly having a laugh when you said modern democracy was cradled in Britain and France, or just ignorant? Who reads your comics to you?

    • Just Sayin' says:

      04:29pm | 10/03/11

      Yes Mac, I’m familiar with the phrase “let them eat cake”.  It was first written in a letter by Rousseau, 18 years before the birth of Marie-Antoinette.  What’s the relevance here?

    • Zopo says:

      02:04pm | 10/03/11

      I thought it was a good speech. If your mates cant be there to “gee: you up and help you get back on your feet then who can. As we expect the US to hep us out in a time of need we should be doing the same during our prosperity.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      02:24pm | 10/03/11

      Good job.  Think they’ll buy it?

      Probably will.  I recall hearing about a speech Howard recently gave to a conservative organisation in the US who went on to applaud him.  If they knew how much of a socialist state Howard’s Australia was they’d have run him out of town on the end of pitch forks. Just look at their reaction to universal health care, i.e like our medicare.

    • dobbo says:

      02:43pm | 10/03/11

      Can we please stop using that hideous Americanism “teared up”...anyway I always misread it initially as something being ripped up.

    • yobbo says:

      03:03pm | 10/03/11

      dobbo
      this merits further discussion, lets touch base and do lunch.

    • Andrew says:

      07:07pm | 10/03/11

      Great idea lets run it up the flagpole and see who salutes.

    • Richard M says:

      03:03pm | 10/03/11

      Gosh, what a surprise!  The Punch, and all its crawling sycophantic right wing disciples criticising Julia Gillard - yet again.  Yawn.  Don’t you ever get sick of this bile - so monotonous, so tediously predictable, so one-eyed? Such utter crap.
      For the record, the PM’s speech was superb.  She struck exactly the right note in relations with our most important ally - the main bulwark between liberal democracy and its many enemies.  But it is pointless to say this on this site, because its controllers, the Murdoch media empire, insist on consistent anti-labor rhetoric, and Julia Gillard must therefore be subject to relentless vicious attack, whatever she is saying and doing.

    • Mac says:

      03:38pm | 10/03/11

      Oh I don’t know, I think you are being harsh. I see both sides being allowed pretty much free reign. Even completely moronic people who believe democracy (modern) was born in Britain and France and those who describe how to lift fat rolls to pee are allowed to post.

    • Peter says:

      04:24pm | 10/03/11

      Why do you read it Richard.  The Fairfax Media and ABC cannot see past Labor.  The 10 9 and 7 channels certainly favour your side, so surely you should be fulfilled in enough in their slavish devotion.
      By the way.  Why is Julia dropping in on Rupert on her sojourn to the States.
      Ridiculous statement RM.

    • Vaunted says:

      05:46pm | 10/03/11

      Richard M, if you’re looking for blind, fawning sycophancy you could try trawling back through your own comments by the sound of it. Most Australians can now recognise both Gillard and her predecessor quite clearly for what they are, and thank goodness we’ve had a Punchbag to express our discontent. I for one am neither a sycophant nor a member of any party, but I can detect a rolled gold phoney at 1500m. It that pair are good enough leaders for you that’s for you to decide, but don’t call me names. I’m very sincere in my belief that they’re both self-serving turkeys and bad for our nation, and why the ALP power brokers have chosen to foist them on the mostly hard working, pragmatic ALP faithful remains a mystery to me.

    • Richard M says:

      10:28pm | 10/03/11

      Oh, perlease, Peter.  You’d better call the TV man ‘cos you have something badly wrong with your reception.  The free to air commercial channels are of course relentlessly anti-Labor, as is Sky News.  Nothing demonstrates more clearly the general right wing bias of most of our media than a claim that the steadfastly middle of the road Fairfax media is biassed towards Labor.  As for the BBBC (Bob Brown Broadcasting Corporation), it is simply far to the left of both major parties.
      as for Vaunted, raving rubbish is not worth replying to.

    • June says:

      03:24pm | 10/03/11

      IT doesnt matter how well she does you will get a few who do not respect the office she holds as the Prime minister.
      Educated people don’t   insult any leader of a country with personal attacks . It’s the hight of bad manners.
      Nobody will think you are clever in doing what you are doing . It reflects on your party and of course we all know who you support , God only knows why. My respect has gone to zero for Tony Abbott as a leader of the opposition because he
      should also respect the high office of a PM. which it seems he doesnt.
      Julia Gillard has done Australia proud and i applaud her. Just respect the position she holds and stop these personal insults they are degrading .

    • Louisa says:

      03:59pm | 10/03/11

      Oh come on June - have you listened to the harpy during question time? Julia, for whom I have no respect, has extremely bad manners….. but then again she has not been correctly educated in that respect

    • John says:

      04:09pm | 10/03/11

      June – what do educated, good mannered people do?

      Stare straight down the barrel of a camera days before a democratic election and tell a bald-faced, knowing lie regarding a major point of policy?

      Respect is earned, not simply handed over.  Deal with it.  Julia hasn’t earned it, no matter what her title.

    • CABAL says:

      04:36pm | 10/03/11

      Maybe if the PM respected the Australian public (enough to not lie to their faces) the Australian public and the LNP might respect here. Respect like equality is a two way street

    • mary says:

      07:02pm | 10/03/11

      With you on this one June. I can’t believe the distasteful comments about our PM. It shows such really poor form. There are many ways to disagree but the way many aussies seem to on the punch with regards to our PM is just plain bad manners. Doesn’t matter if you’re for or against. Doesn’t matter if she lied or not, it’s like your parents .. you just don’t call them names, no matter what.
      Yeah, reflects really badly on the people doing so.

    • mary says:

      06:26am | 11/03/11

      Interesting moderation going on lately. Totally agree with you on this one June. Don’t know how many times this needs to be submitted before it gets posted .. if at all. Seems that lately only certain opinions are allowed to be expressed on the Punch. Maybe Penbo and his crew would like to look into that. Or is this intentional? It appears that the Punch is morphing into the other news sites where only certain opinions get air.

      And yes I also am disgusted with the name calling and lack of respect for our PM on this site. Very poor form. And indeed not an indication of educated opinions.

    • Bonestar says:

      03:41pm | 10/03/11

      This a new Julia - Yankee friendly Julia. John Howard is so well respected overseas she wouldn’t have been given the time of day if she said anything negative about him. I wonder if Juliar or Kevin will be remembered so fondly? I say definately not.

    • Paul C says:

      04:37pm | 10/03/11

      Julia V4.5 - Complete with lying add-on module.

    • notSue says:

      03:43pm | 10/03/11

      Haven’t read a transcript yet, but I’m kinda glad I haven’t! Sounds like a good deal of good ol’ fashioned sucking up was the oder of the day. Urrrgh!  Although, when one is in the presence of Congress, I suppose it is churlish to do otherwise. However, surely the Americans are thinking we are nothing but sycophantic nobodies, to be patted on our head and sent on our merry way? Didn’t realise Julia was Bob Menzies, just with transatlantic tremblings.. *siigh**

    • Richard M says:

      04:32pm | 10/03/11

      What utter nonsense.  Do you actually believe this half-baked twaddle?  The USA, the defender of the free world (whatever you may think of their tactics from time to time, they are our only hope) welcome any nation which is a stalwart ally and friend, ready to stand with them - and to remember with gratitude the many thousands of their young who they have sent to die on foreign battlefields to defend freedom and democracy.  They don’t get a lot of gratitude, mainly criticism and denigration, so they appreciate fully the steadfastness of their friends in the Anglosphere who stand with them, as we have always done.The world would be giving Nazi salutes or acting as slaves for the Japanese if it wasn’t for the Anglosphere, led by the US.  Be proud of our place in this honourable group and don’t spout such adolescent rubbish.
      Wouldn’t it be great if many of the contributors on this site could just put aside their petty partisanship and juvenile animosities to look at the bigger picture.  Too much to ask, obviously.

    • notSue says:

      05:32pm | 10/03/11

      I guess it’s also too much to ask for an Australian PM to not arse -lick? Ever wondered why the Americans “don’t get a lot of gratitude, mainly criticism and denigration” ?  Foreign policy perhaps?
      I agree, without the Yanks during WW2 the war would not have been won. However, what about the other wars they’ve dragged us into - Vietnam? Afghanistan? Iraq?

      I am no longer sure we need to be so closely identified with “this honourable group”.  I am however, sure that it’s time we looked like a grown-up nation, able to think for ourselves on the world stage, bijou though we are and ever shall be.  It is the alacrity with which we relish any sign of acknowledgement of our existence from “big brother’ and the sycophancy we public display that I find difficult to swallow. We can remain an ally without losing our dignity ( and Julia’s cherry) in the process, surely?

      Oh and I’ll spout whatever “rubbish” I believe, ta very much.

    • acotrel says:

      10:09pm | 10/03/11

      @NotSue
      ’ However, what about the other wars they’ve dragged us into - Vietnam? Afghanistan? Iraq?’

      Get your facts straight.  Paul Hasluck went to Washington on behalf of the Menzies govt.  to lobby the yanks to send infantry into Vietnam to supplement the ‘advisors’.  By the time the troops were in Vietnam, the crisis in Indonesia was over, but we were committed !  The much vaunted ‘domino effect was a furphy.  When we lost, it never happened!  SE Asia is mainly non-communist, despite what Hasluck, and Menzies would have had us believe would be the consequence of not sending our troops to ‘Nam!

    • Tezza says:

      10:56am | 11/03/11

      Actually, I think we DID win the Vietnam war didn’t we? I have little doubt that had we not entered the conflict the South would have been quickly defeated, and a communist insurgency would have prevailed in Thailand. Possibly Malaya. The Americans did enough in Vietnam to exhaust the North Vietnamese army and prevent these other dominoes from falling.
      Regarding Julia’s address to Congress: I thought she did well. I wouldn’t vote for her, and i don’t think she is a good prime minister, but she is definitely a good talker (remember in past life she was a top lawyer for one of the slickest legal outfits around; and that is a field where “the gift of the gab” is a prime attribute for success).
      The anti-Americanism of the left amazes me. Just ask yourselves if the world would have been a better place if the Russians had won the cold war. (Gulag archipelago anyone)?
      Or what about if the Nazis had prevailed in the Second World War - that one was in fact pretty touch and go. Had Hitler not fancied himself as a general and invaded Russia a month too late; or had he taken Moscow (the key to the Russian railway system - he almost did take it) then the Russians would never have winkled him out of there, and the war was won by Hitler. So, actually it was not the yanks who really beat Hitler (although they put the icing on the cake at the end). 
      How close did the Japanese come to victory? Had they won at Guadalcanal and in the Coral Sea then Australia was history. No doubt Japanese are all very polite and friendly these days (although their school history books still can’t quite bring themselves to tell the truth about the war), but if you want to know what they were like with their boot on your throat do some reading about the fall of Nanking.
      Unlike her erstwhile colleagues in the Left, Julia is at least sensible enough to know that America is worth sucking up to.

    • NotSue says:

      09:42pm | 11/03/11

      @ acotrel
      I think I do have my facts straight, thanks. Yes, we initially entered the Viet conflict as “advisors” and perhaps we requested support from the Yanks, ( our staunch alies) however, the Americans escalated the Viernam conflict massively, relying on “Domino principal” ideas to back it, in turn requiring from us a larger and larger ( conscripted)  fighting contingent. The Yanks could have pulled the plug at any time, but in their typically oveconfident way, only prolonged the conflict. At least we were in the region ( ie Asia) and had a legitimate intial cause. The Americans quickly learned to their (and our) cost the price of interfering in a guerilla civil war.

    • notSue says:

      09:58pm | 11/03/11

      @ Tezza.
      The Domino Theory was proven to be bunkem, ultimately. There were many internal factors, apart from proximity, which prevented Thailand and Malayasia from following the Indochinese example.

      As for Russia, you are correct. Hitler made Napoleon’s mistake of launching as offensive which fell into a Russian winter. However, if not for the sturdiness and bloody -mindedness of the Russian resitance, it may have fallen - BUT he would never have been able to hold it.

      I’ve acknowledged the assistance given in the Pacific theatre by the Americans. however, that was then and this is NOW. The Yanks are a powerful ally, granted, but I still maintain that if we are EVER to become a nation with some sort of international standing, we need to have our *own* views on the world, without reliance on blindly following the stances taken by our more important ally - which aren’t always justifiable nor advisable. Again, please explain the second Iraqi conflict and why we’re STILL in Afghanistan, except at the behest of our big brother??

    • mary says:

      04:03pm | 10/03/11

      As our prime minister visiting an overseas ally, she did extremely well. As a matter of fact I read that she’s outdone any other speaker. Good on ye Julia. Isn’t that what friends do, give each other a pat on the back? She did it well.

      I’m just a little mystified by the following coming from an atheist,
      “the eyes of the world are still upon you.
      Your city on a hill cannot be hidden.”

      I’m sure though that these sentiments, inserted strategically at the end of the speech, weren’t lost on the (mostly religious) congress.

      “You are the light of the world. A city built that is set on a hill cannot be hid.”
      yes from the bible (Matthew 5).

      The relevance however is lost on me because this line is part of the sermon on the mount and in reference to the poor, the downtrodden, the humble, the rejected, the merciful and the peace makers being blessed ..

      I guess Julia has clever speech writers.

    • Paul C says:

      04:07pm | 10/03/11

      I bet congress felt like they were all back in school.  To her credit, she did seem to keep the sign-language down to a minimum.

    • Ryan says:

      04:16pm | 10/03/11

      Oh common, whats wrong with poodle!

    • Ryan says:

      04:27pm | 10/03/11

      Can I say, “conga line of red poodle suckholes”?

    • TCB 24 X 7 says:

      04:27pm | 10/03/11

      Hmm,
      I can imagine what the chinese living here and in China are reading into, about her speech,
      Sounds like we will have to intervene with the U.S. if they keep expanding their military.
                I wonder if Greens or labor Lefties would agree entirely with her speech.

    • Ryan says:

      04:36pm | 10/03/11

      What about “conga line of suckhole mincing poodles”?

    • Reg says:

      09:36am | 11/03/11

      Better than a fairy ring of bleeding faux-liberals with a smattering of honorary strap-on men in tow.

    • true democrat says:

      06:21pm | 10/03/11

      Democracy or modern democracy is still democracy, in any democracy only the people are sovereign not just a select ones or party politic in power.
      Democracy is to give the people what people ask NOT what she thinks and her cronies the people ought to have “THE CARBON TAX”.

      Autocracy or moderm autocracy is still autocracy , in any autocracy only the elected ones or the party in power decide what to give to the people and the people are IRRELEVANT like in a SERFDOM , the Barons and the SERFS this is exactly what we are right now.

      If she could respect democracy the same way as she is respecting her americans friends we would be a more prosperous country without any debts and more relaxed and comfortable that we are today under the rule of autoparticracy.

    • stephen says:

      06:51pm | 10/03/11

      Hot diggety dawg, That’s my gal !

    • Matthew says:

      06:54pm | 10/03/11

      So is this the real real real Julia .... lol at the fawning by the media just waiting for any, any piece of good news about our current PM and Labor party.

      But tearing up about the moon landing .... are you serious, choking back tears ?  It’s like a puppy that has learnt a new trick and can do it on cue ... oh dear.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      07:07pm | 10/03/11

      For ABC-TV to claim, as they did in their 7.00pm News that “Julia Gillard received rapturous applause” when she addressed the Chamber of the US House of Representatives is indeed drawing a very, very, very long bow! Anyone from the President of the USA, down to a non-entity such as the Australian Prime Minister, including John W Howard, are afforded a standing bout of applause on their entry to the Chamber. They are also afforded another standing, minutes-long bout of applause when they stop speaking. Members of the Australian Parliament do exactly the same for any foreigner invited to address the Australian Parliament. It is all totally meaningless window-dressing!
      According to reports from Washington there were, despite it being touted as “A Joint Meeting of both the US House of Representatives & Senate” precious few actual elected members of either House present for, this time, it had been padded out with friends & families of Democrat (the US equivalent of our ALP) supporters, just as it was padded out with Republican (equiv to our Liberal-Nationals) family & friends when Howard addressed the Chamber!
      Gillard, just like Howard, said all the things the US wanted to hear:  All praise & no criticism, what good allies we were (this our “Howard Echo” repeated numerous times at every opportunity she got!) - Typically & sycophantically she made no mention of the USA being allies of Australia. There is a great difference!
      This was a totally meaningless charade. It was nothing more than an exercise, once again, of an Australian Prime Minister, albeit this time an unelected “Grace & Favour Prime Minister” at the behest of three Independents & those despicable, stand-over merchants the Greens, sycophantically doing & saying exactly what the USA wanted her to say.
      Rather than poncing about the USA Gillard would be better served if she stayed in Australia & tried to restore her & her dreadful government’s appalling reputation with the vast majority of Australia’s voters!
      Her standing with the public is way, way below that of the man who’s position she usurped as Preferred Prime Minister!  Welcome back Prime Minister Kevin Rudd!. The ALP’s standing is, just like Joooolya’s, in free-fall. A change of Prime Minister is almost assured - not that they have anyone of any substance to replace her with. Joooolya has, for the sake of the Party, to go & go now.

    • Le Ombre says:

      09:56pm | 10/03/11

      Chamberlain meet Hitler and Stalin and it was all lovey duvvy,,, Viva la Peoples Revolution, Viva Tony Abbott,Bravo Bravo

    • Rick says:

      10:51pm | 10/03/11

      She speaks with elegance but she acts like a bastards.
      A true Jekyl and Hide and I don’t like that.
      Can’t trust a person with this kind of behave.

    • ASS KISSING JUDGE says:

      11:20pm | 10/03/11

      The moon walk part of her speech was plagerised almost word for word from a speech at a gig Bono did some time ago, even more nauseating was her real tears for a memory from 1969 compared to crocodile tears for flood victims in 2011, talk about hippocrite, this sad excuse of a leader has spent most of her adult life USA bashing and now gives the best Brown Nose performance of anyone I have ever seen KISS US.ASS. If she was there a few weeks ago she’d be coming back with the top OSCAR,” sorry folks I gotta go”,,,,,,, have to drive the porcelain bus some more,,,, ralph,,ralph,,ralph.

    • PORCELAIN BUS DRIVER says:

      11:44pm | 10/03/11

      I’m writing a satirical drama play about a deceptive, sneaky, sly, two faced, ambitious lying, red headed politician, who at any cost will do anything and say anything to stay in power, including selling her soul to the devil, and kissing the arses of the ones she spent a lifetime criticising and hating. Think I’ll call it VOMITUS MAXIMUS.

    • stephen says:

      08:09am | 11/03/11

      Bus Drivers don’t write plays, stupid .
      They drive buses, so get to it and don’t annoy the passengers.

    • Govt.Fauxcitizen says:

      12:00am | 11/03/11

      Hells Bells she speaks a heap of shit, and she’s got such a big mouth.

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      12:51am | 11/03/11

      Conga line of suckholes indeed.  It was an embarrassing display in all, we need to get away from America not closer.

      Suck up to the US and Israel.  That’s her deal.

    • Sean Williams says:

      03:29am | 11/03/11

      I guess this give you a warm glow. Nothing to put a spring in an Aussie’s step like the thought that they actually matter, especially to their beloved Yanks. As Gillard addressed a room 70 per cent filled with interns and Australian Embassy staff, the President was off somewhere talking to the British PM about Libya and discussing his forthcoming full state visit to the USA’s pre-eminent ally, no doubt joking with Cameron about the funny woman with a strange accent from one of his former colonies who thought it appropriate to bring a strange football with her to the Oval Office for a chuck-about. What a joke Australia is.

    • grumpy old man says:

      07:16am | 11/03/11

      I thought it was a total suck up to a dying empire, and practically begging the US to put more troops in AU will have her left wing predecessors turning in their graves.

    • mervyn ford says:

      10:49am | 11/03/11

      Your piece should have been entitled “Ma Kettle goes to Washington”

      The hypocracy is breathtaking, this is the same party that used every opportunity to have a go at Howard and the relationship he had fostered with the US. Howard was a professional, Gillard was cringeworthy. And the tears…probably for herself.

    • Reg says:

      02:54pm | 11/03/11

      You faux-liberals sure are a mealy mouthed bunch of sad sacks. No-one can do anything right except that ineffectually shit-happens apology for a would be Prime Minister, Tony the inept.

    • m says:

      09:49am | 12/03/11

      Reg, grow up. No-one can explain away they idiots in govt…unless its another idiot
      you would you would have had a spray if howard had delivered such a suck speech

    • Ryan says:

      04:28pm | 11/03/11

      @Reg: sorry they had been censoring just about every comment I made so the last three you saw were me protesting and asking what was wrong with calling Julia Gillard by her own parties words. A mincing poodle followed by a conga line of suckholes I believe they were.
      Oh well, at least she didn’t feign tears again, oh wait she did.

    • Ryan says:

      04:29pm | 11/03/11

      @Reg: hey Reg, what is a faux-liberal? Is it anything like a lying commie red head?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter