Australia has taken another huge step towards hosting the World Cup after it withdrew its 2018 bid to let Europe host the tournament – galvanising European support behind our 2022 bid.

On home soil? A 2022 Australian World Cup is looking more like reality. Photo: Getty Images

In a tactical masterstroke which saw FIFA take the rare step of publicly praising Australia for its “exemplary” conduct, Football Federation Australia chairman Frank Lowy said yesterday Australia would now concentrate solely on the 2022 World Cup to clear the path for Europe in 2018.

The move is a coup for two reasons – it has sidelined the United States, which is still bidding for 2018 and 2022, and won plaudits from Europe, which holds eight votes on the 24-member FIFA executive committee which selects the host nations.

Many or even all of those eight European committee members are expected to back Australia in 2022 – a massive voting bloc given that we need 13 votes to get over the line.

Australia is now tantalisingly close to securing a majority bloc, with strong support from Europe, the one vote from the Oceania group, and some votes from Africa where the FFA and Australian Government have been commended for their $500,000 poverty and education programs.

And while Asian support is patchy – especially with Japan and South Korea mounting their own 2022 bid – the FFA is looking at bringing the region into our bid by staging World Cup friendly matches with our Asian neighbours, regardless of whether they have qualified for the finals. 

The change in Australia’s position was announced via a very rare joint public statement between FIFA and Football Federation Australia.

FIFA CEO Jerome Valcke said the FFA and FIFA had been “in constant dialogue about Australia’s bidding intentions since last autumn”.

“The FFA have displayed an exemplary level of solidarity with Europe and the European Bidding Nations and were among the very first to enter into an open and constructive dialogue with me after it became apparent that there was a growing movement to stage the 2018 World Cup in Europe,” Mr Valcke said.

“Their announcement of today therefore, to henceforth focus solely on bidding for the 2022 World Cup, is a welcome gesture that is much appreciated by FIFA’s leadership and Executive Committee. We wish to thank Mr. Lowy, the FFA and the Australian Government”.

The development was forecast earlier this week by News Limited when, in an eclsuive interview, FFA Chairman Frank Lowy said he was considering focussing solely on the 2022 bid.

The decision has been months in the making and is unrelated to the fact that Asian Football Federation president Mohammed Bin Hammam , from Qatar, this week publicly backed Europe to host in 2018, to boost his country’s chances of hosting in 2022.

“We have been in discussion with FIFA for months,” Mr Lowy said yesterday.

“It is that trusting relationship with the leadership of the governing body that has caused us to focus on 2022 and decide to leave the field for 2018 to European Contenders”

The 2022 cup bid is a five-way race between Australia, Qatar, the USA, Japan and South Korea.

But each of the last three have recently hosted World Cups - the USA in 1994 and Japan-South Korea jointly in 2002. And while Qatar has backing as the first Arab host nation, there are concerns over the nation’s punishing heat which would force the use of air-conditioned stadiums and underground training facilities.

Sports Minister Kate Ellis, who is in South Africa with Mr Lowy and FFA CEO Ben Buckley for this week’s FIFA Congress, said the decision had boosted our chances of securing the tournament.

“As Australia was making a single bid for the 2018 OR 2022 World Cup - the only change is the FFA will now focus on the 2022 Bid,” Ms Ellis said.

“This can only be a good thing for our bid and major strategic move as we head into the final straight. Australia can deliver an event that the country, the region and the world can be proud of.”

54 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • KH says:

      08:04am | 11/06/10

      Of course this was the obvious way to go.  Europe and South America have been the only winners of the Cup since 1930.  The tournament mostly went between them in hosting duties until recently.  The USA has been a recent host (1994), and so has Japan/South Korea (only in 2002).  For me, the USA tournament was the worst - well, certainly the most boring I have seen!

      2010 is South Africa, 2014 Brazil (so South America) - there was no way Europe was going to have a third world cup in a row outside of Europe in 2018.  It was a wasted bid for us, and England have every chance of getting it.  2022 gives us the best chance ever - Japan/South Korea are unlikely to get it since they hosted it so recently - even in 2022 it will only be 20 years.  Australia have never hosted, and have an excellent track record of hosting international events.  The time difference for Europe and South America is not that different to any other part of Asia.  I think we will probably get 2022, which would be brilliant.

    • The Cricket says:

      02:49pm | 11/06/10

      KH,
      The ‘94 WC final was definitely the worst I’ve ever seen. But the rest of the tournament was a cracker. Remember the brilliant Romanians with Hagi? Bulgaria with Hristo Stroichkov into the semis, along with the Swedes. Sadly no Australia again!

    • Macca says:

      08:32am | 11/06/10

      Manipulation is everything within FIFA, Australia is in good hands with Lowy the head of its bid.

      Hopefully, the European voters remember this decision.

    • Steve Smith says:

      09:08am | 11/06/10

      “Hopefully, the European voters remember this decision”

      My thoughts exactly!

    • roundage says:

      08:45am | 11/06/10

      Its a real thrill for us football fans to see Mr Lowy on the global stage making a pitch for Australia to host. Whether we get ‘22 or not, its great to see our fine nation have a seat at the Fifa table. Bravo !

      And rest assured, the gov’t money is well spent compared to tourism ads and the rest. This bid is raising Australia’s profile beyond just the football field.

    • roundage says:

      08:48am | 11/06/10

      KH ... Time zones for TV work in Asia’s favour for 2022 also. 2002 - last time in Asia, 2006 + 2010 - Europe/Africa, 2014 - Americas, 2018 - Europe. 2022 should go back to the Asian time zone before the Americas/USA.

    • KH says:

      09:03am | 11/06/10

      I was pointing out that the time zone is no advantage to any Asian group player….....

    • roundage says:

      09:37am | 11/06/10

      yeah i was thinking of the benefits for Asian TV audiences given it won’t have been in this zone for 20 years by the time 2022 comes round. As opposed to the USA getting it so soon after Brasil

    • shabangabang says:

      08:49am | 11/06/10

      Pulling out of the 2018 bid was a stroke of genius by Frank Lowy and Co.
      To concentrate on 2022, and having to deal with, effectively only Qatar we should get it. USA and Sth Korea/Japan should already have been ruled out for recently hosting it in ‘94 and ‘02 respectively. Surprised China hasn’t put in a bid for the 2022 cup. They could have been a real rival to our bid.

    • Bob H says:

      10:21am | 11/06/10

      If we get 2022 - Lowy needs to be recognised by Australia and have a state named after him (never liked the name Queensland - hmmmm Lowyland thats better)

    • barry says:

      11:32am | 11/06/10

      With Frank Lowy at the helm we are in good shape - he does not do anything by halves.

      Go you Aussies…...!

    • Your name:Hung says:

      04:49pm | 11/06/10

      Thank you mr Frank Lowy wiht you the helm of FFA we’ve seen soccer have taken off. Please bring the game home” AUSTRALIA FOR 2012”. We are all behind you 110%

    • Razor says:

      11:34am | 11/06/10

      I don’t support Australia bidding for this.

      However, i will be happy if this means a new Stadium will be built to replace Subiaco Oval and Perth Oval is upgraded significantly.

    • Kenny says:

      11:40am | 11/06/10

      Sorry soccer lovers, but the Europeans won’t give a stuff about our bid, we will not get a WC for a long, long time, if ever.  FIFA knows that the majority of Aussies support our national game & rugby & are against a WC, because it will disropt our favourite sports.

    • Bruce says:

      02:23pm | 11/06/10

      FIFA could see that as a reason to give Australia the WC.

    • Steve M says:

      03:05pm | 11/06/10

      I’m not a soccer fan at all, but surely bringing the WC here could only be a good thing. Both economically for the country but also for the game here? I mean it is still struggling and if it succeeds it takes nothing away from league, afl or union.

    • Pieman says:

      04:14pm | 11/06/10

      Whats our national game? AFL? The game dilike by over 50% of the population. It is thinking like this that will not see Australia move forward. lucky for us you are not invlovled

    • gil4d says:

      11:49pm | 11/06/10

      such a fuss over such a boaring boaring game but then i think all ball games on tv are like watching paint dry

    • NEFFA says:

      11:50am | 11/06/10

      Give it up Australia, you will never host the world cup.
      lets look at it. this is supposed the “world game”. the world consists of seven continents. lets leave out Antarctica as,even though the Koreans have taught Penguins to play soccer, i dont think they do it in the wild.
      so - 2002 world cup = asian continent. 2006 world cup = european continent. 2010 world cup = african continent. 2014 world cup = south american continent. 2018 and we only have 2 continents left, Australia and North America, yet FIFA want the world cup in Europe again. Why?
      Let me tell you why. they are scared of letting the “new world” take over, they are haning on ferociously to the past when Europe was relevant.
      These people will never give us the hosting gig because they are afraid of soccer getting out of their control.
      however i will never listen to anyone ever again calling this the world game, when it so clearly isnt.

    • Warren says:

      12:19pm | 11/06/10

      People said similar things before Sydney won the Olympic bid. FIFA want football to expand as a global sport, not contract.

    • Steve Smith says:

      12:31pm | 11/06/10

      When clearly AFL is the world game!

    • Warren says:

      12:01pm | 11/06/10

      Lets hope the other local footy codes stop trying to torpedo our bid to host the world cup. Statements about football stadiums “not being available” are to say the least, unhelpful.

    • Steph says:

      12:42pm | 11/06/10

      I’ll agree with you there but, considering the issues being experienced at Etihad Stadium’s surface, I can assure you that FIFA would never approve of the stadium’s surface for a world cup game, primarily due to asthetics & safety. I should know, I worked there previously and was privvy to their quiet assessments.

    • TheRealDave says:

      01:20pm | 11/06/10

      Soccer Australia would be better off spending the money developing their own game here in Australia - a very minor game in Australia I might add, rather than throwing it away on yet another useless World Cup bid. It aint gonna happen. Not when its only a fringe game here that can’t get any decent TV airtime ever on any station.

      Face facts, we have three major winter sports - League, AFL and Union. Always have, always will. Sure we might get a few extra people jump on the bandwagon every few years but we all know soccer will always be a third rate game here.

      Whats next, bidding for the Baseball world series?? Caber Tossing World Cup?

    • mightymitch says:

      01:52pm | 11/06/10

      league will be dead by 2022 dave.

    • b0ris says:

      02:42pm | 11/06/10

      You sir, are an idiot!

    • Steve M says:

      03:03pm | 11/06/10

      LOL. Oh Mitch, cut back on the medication there my lad. Its affecting your brain!

    • Bob H says:

      05:01pm | 11/06/10

      Football is the biggest game in Australia and the fastest growing check the facts - more people play it than any other sport.  If you are talking about lard arsing around a TV, then wobbly ball is the big one.  However sport is not about TV it is about participation and not drinking beer and while sitting on a sofa.  Maybe this is why we are the worlds most obese nation.

    • Tom says:

      06:11pm | 11/06/10

      So true Mitch. Just look at the exodus of NRL’s best to rival codes. Football will be Australia’s most popular sport by 2022 when we host the WC!

    • mightymitch says:

      07:44pm | 11/06/10

      Boris and Steve M have resorted to the last stand of people who haven’t enough brain power to rebut, abuse, if you had used facts to back up your claims i would have been willing to listen.
      I like what you have to say Tom, not only is there an exodus of players, but an exodus of fans as well. No sport can survive when the only revenue available comes from pensioners playing pokies.

    • c says:

      09:49pm | 11/06/10

      its not Soccer Australia its football federation of australia genius

    • Steve says:

      09:27am | 12/06/10

      That is the most riduculous thing I have read! When you say we have three major winter sports - League, AFL and Union…in what context?! we are a country of 20 million…out of billions of people!!.

      Not sure if you were in Sydney during the Olympics but it was amazing and there has been a legacy which will be ten fold if we get the World Cup.

    • Harquebus says:

      02:26pm | 11/06/10

      The last thing we need is the World Cup. An expensive, boring and irrelevant media extravaganza which will not benefit us at all but, leave us with another mountain of debt. The Olympics did the basket cases Greece and NSW a whole lot of good. Yeah right! South Africa’s national pride has just cost them a fortune.

    • Andy says:

      04:42pm | 12/06/10

      Above you don’t have brain, a world sport event like the World Cup or Olympics will make money for our economy. Tourists will come here in the millions and that means a lot of dollars flowing into our economy. Boring? for you and people like you that is.

    • Harquebus says:

      02:02pm | 15/06/10

      I doubt they will come here in the millions and I also doubt that profits on sales, not just the money they spend, will pay for the infrastructure that goes along with these media extravaganzas. Try not sitting on your brain Andy.

    • Keith says:

      02:27pm | 11/06/10

      As a devoted soccer fan, in a way, I don’t wish the World Cup to come to Australia. It is a prestigious honour to host a World Cup. I don’t wish my country to be the laughing stock of the world. Reasons?

      1. There will be the expectation that World Cup games be played at places like the MCG, SCG and Gabba. These places aren’t even appropriate to play soccer. It’s a disgrace and insult to fans to be sitting so far from the game. If we want the World Cup, we need proper stadiums.
      2. There will still be those idiot AFL-Rugby League authorities who won’t agree to let the World Cup use their stadium because they will feel their game is more important than the “biggest sporting event in every 4 years”.
      3. The capacity to accomodate an extra 500,000+ people in a space of 1 month will be a difficult challenge. More hotels please.
      4. Capacity of airports? Look at Perth International Airport. It’s an embarassment. It can take up to 2 hours just to leave that airport when there is an influx of 300+ travellers arriving at the same time. Improve our airports please.
      5. Soccer is not one of the top sporting codes in Australia, such the atmosphere that can be generated for the game couldn’t compare to soccer-mad countries around the world.
      6. There will always be your idiot AFL-Rubgy League fanatics who will embarass themselves with their ignoranace of the ‘global game’.

      By the end of the day, sure it will be an honour for the World Cup to come to Australia. If Australians can actually realise the great priviledge they have of hosting a World Cup and make the appropriate actions for it, then please bring it home. I don’t want a half ass job of a World Cup here in Australia.

    • rcfinc says:

      05:38pm | 11/06/10

      Keith,

      1. Football (soccer) hasn’t been played at the SCG or Gabba for a very long time.  Have you heard about the Sydney Football Stadium, Sydney Olympic Stadium, and finally Brisbane’s Suncorp Stadium?  And I have been to two amazing world cup qualifiers at the MCG - one in 1997 being a shattering night for Australian sport, full of emotion.
      2. A compromise will be found for the world’s biggest event - sporting or otherwise.
      3. FFA’s bid will have already addressed this problem.  Remember Frank Lowy didn’t become Australia’s richest man through poor planning.
      4. See 3 above.  Sydney and Melbourne already can handle major sporting events such as the Olympics and Commonwealth Games.
      5. What is a top sporting code?  What is seen on free-to-air TV or how many people participate?  And what will Australia be like in 12 years time - just think how much it has changed in the past 12.  You obviously weren’t at the Sydney Olympic Stadium in 2005 when Australia beat Uruguay to qualify for the 2006 World Cup.  I doubt whether any single sporting event in Australia’s history could match the atmosphere at that game.  The pent-up emotion just over flowed as Australia was about to enter the world stage again after 32 years of frustration.
      6. All the codes can co-exist.  But 12 years out the landscape will be very different once the bid has been won.  The major competitive sport for amateurs is football (soccer) - so all those 10 year olds (boys and the every increasing girls) will want to attend matches as adults.

      As I said, Frank Lowy is Australia’s richest man through genius, detailed planning, and most importantly being politically savy - far more than any of our politicians.  Who ever thought Sydney would win the 2000 Olympics against China.  Thorough planning down to the minutest detail won the vote.  And Frank knows that.

      RC Finc

    • 3 lions says:

      12:45pm | 12/06/10

      RCFINC

      Your point 5 is the single, most-sensible and accurate statement I have read in relation to the whole “most popular sport in Australia” argument. As has been stated previously, placing oneself in front of a TV screen is no substitute for taking part. With a ramped-up profile and the lure of big $$$$‘s to the (all of a sudden clued-up) media, the ‘playing field’ is going to change dramatically over the coming years. You heard it here first!

    • Matt says:

      02:42pm | 11/06/10

      I find it to be disappointing reading peoples comments about not wanting to host the World Cup and that Soccer should ‘know it’s role’ in the Australian Sporting landscape. Having experienced the World Cup first hand in both Germany and Australia in 2006, the World Cup was much more than a sporting event. It goes beyond winning and losing, wrong referring decisions, players diving and coaching selections. It is an event that unites. For one month we forget about cultural/personal differences and stand side by side and support our nation. More importantly, it unites different cultures and countries together in a way that no other event does because it unites the everyday ordinary people who live in those countries.

      I have no doubt that if we win the World Cup, Football will still not be the number one sport in this nation. It probably never will be. However, the World Cup will give Australians the chance to showcase our country like never before and even more importantly, it allows every Australian the opportunity to be apart of a true cultural festival.

    • hmmm says:

      02:51pm | 11/06/10

      How can this be praised as a stroke of genius? More like tail between the legs stuff. It was obvious Aus was no chance on hosting 2018 so they should have soley focussed on 2022. All this time has been a complete waste. Can we have our tax dollars back please.
      As for the 2022 bid - at least Aus have some chance - although Qatar would be more beneficial to the game you would have to say.
      There is not much ground-level support in Aus for the game of soccer - let alone to host a WC

    • iansand says:

      06:35pm | 11/06/10

      It’s always a good idea going into a negotiation with something you can throw away.  Even better if, by throwing that away, you get the other side to support your preferred position.

    • nosthow says:

      03:16pm | 11/06/10

      What an honour for Australia if we are selected to host the World Cup soccer in 2022. But which city should host it ? I am from Brisaband so I think we shoudl host it. Certainly not Sydney or Melbourne who have enough sports thrown their way already. Brisbane it is then !

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      08:26pm | 11/06/10

      A whole country and not just one city hosts the World Cup hahaha

    • Bundy Bloke says:

      03:36pm | 11/06/10

      Only threat to soccer assuming it’s rightful mantle of number one sport in Oz are the boofheads who for 30 years have controlled commercial tv sports coverage, protecting their own jobs. Average Ozzie trundles along oblivous to the massively unfair sports coverage shoved down their throats. Despite 30 years of saturation coverage ARL attendances are about 10-20% above A League which channels 7, 9 and 10 go out of their way to ihide, ignore and disparage. If socccer got 50% of the coverage boofhead boy games do - it, then netball could ssume their rightful places as by far number one and two Aussie sports. STOP falling for the boofhead overhyped ‘state of boredom’ origin yawnfest.

    • Tim says:

      04:31pm | 11/06/10

      Ha ha,
      it must be fun living in your fictional country.
      Last year A League averaged 9800,
      Last year NRL averaged 16000 whilst having 60 more games.
      NRL had 70 of the top 100 rated shows on Foxtel.

      Just a tad bigger than 10-20%.

      Only threat to tiddlywinks assuming it’s rightful mantle of number one sport in Oz are the boofheads who for 30 years have controlled commercial tv sports coverage, protecting their own jobs.

      Oh, that and the fact that no-one really likes it.

    • mikk says:

      06:46am | 12/06/10

      I respectfully suggest it is “the boofheads” who control international commercial TV that are failing consumers. They are the ones not promoting superior sports like rugby or afl. Who can take a game seriously where the most common score is nil all.

    • Bruce says:

      08:00pm | 11/06/10

      What other team can get tens of thousands of people out onto the streets in all our major cities in celebration?

    • eric says:

      08:03pm | 11/06/10

      Nice to see you on the bandwagon David.No doubt your sports columnists are sharpening their knives, waiting for the World Cup to finish so they can stick it to “soccer”.

    • lee says:

      09:04am | 13/06/10

      Your comment:if australia want to host the 2022 world cup,they must do better then four years ago and must be in the top 20 of the football ranking.other wise they can kiss their chances goodbye.in my oppinion australia will not get past the first round.positive or no positive attitute will not place them any better or wors,this is just fact.

    • luke09 says:

      05:28pm | 13/06/10

      Is anyone watching the world cup on tv without the mute button?

      They should ban the annoying trumpets, it sounds like an attack of wasps, bees, blowflies or some other annoying insect.

    • Dan says:

      11:16pm | 13/06/10

      what is hilarious is that Qatar are even being seriously considered.

      The daytime temperatures right now are well above 45 every day, nightime temps are 30+

      They have stated that all games will be held in indoor air conditioned stadiums. Can anyone say greenhouse gas? carbon reduction?

      I am in Kuwait at the moment and we have our first days of 50+ degrees.

      You would assume then that the TV audience would have to be huge considering that no-one will put themselves through that cruel punishment of walking from taxi to venue in 50deg. BUT Al Jazeera have been struggling to telecast games so far as their signal has been sabotaged by hackers.

      Qatar vs Australia??  no question about it,  it is after all a winter game.

    • acker says:

      06:18pm | 14/06/10

      @Dan ..what is hilarious is you must be from Sydney or Brisbane as Melbourne and Adelaide often top 40 for 1-2week spells in February ..every day

    • Ronk says:

      04:22pm | 15/06/10

      Noooo! let the Europeans and South Americans have it, they are the only places where significant numbers of people are actually willing to pay to see a soccer game. If the world soccer authorities are stupid enough to give the misnamed “World” cup of their sport to a country where most people would find it more exciting watching paint dry, there will be a massive debt for themselves and for Australia as very few Europeans and S Americans are rich enough and have enough annual holidays to fly all the way to Australia for a month - and travel between states.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter