Politics rarely gets as bizarre as when Eric Abetz gets it right – even if it is in admitting he stuffed it up.

Heyyyyyy, sit on it: Even the Fonz was stumped by admitting he was wrong.

Like the Fonz choking on the word ‘wrong,’ most of our leaders just can’t spit out the magic word even when it’s so obviously in their best interest to ‘fess up and apologise.

Abetz’s effort in apologising to the PM met a majority of the requirements in the Definitive Punch Guide to Saying Sorry After Publicly Disgracing Yourself, which I outline below.

In doing so Abetz mitigated the self-inflicted damage over his role in the Grech affair, while managing to further embarrass his Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, who broke nearly every rule in the book.

The beauty of the well-executed apology is that it takes all the heat out of an issue, convincing the media that is preying on you not only that they have had a win but that they have made you a better person in the process.

It taps into the grand Shakespearian narrative of modern day politics, heroic figures rising to power and prominence but always harbouring a private flaw that will prove their undoing.

The apology works because it embraces hyperbole, recognising that just as the powers of our leaders are embellished on the way up, so too are the extent of their failings on the way back down. It’s part of the deal.

In this light Abetz’s effort, lined up with the Turnbull non-apology, are good case studies in what to do and what not to do when you are in the deep doo-doo.

Abetz chose the local Hobart ABC radio studio with a journalist he was comfortable with and simply took his medicine. His apology to Rudd was non-conditional, he attempted to explain his actions, but not justify them. He repeated his words in Parliament, placing them on the official record.

In contrast and on the same day Turnbull couldn’t bring himself to admit wrongdoing. Instead he withdrew the allegations and then got caught into a technical argument that went all the way back to the AWB inquiry to argue Oppositions should have a go.

Turnbull’s mistake was he approached the question like a lawyer, looking for a defence, missing the point that the real value of a well-formed public apology is accrued by the transgressor.

Instead of ruling a line through the issue, Turnbull has keep the question of his judgment alive because he has sent the public the message that he does not think he has done anything wrong. In doing so, he has ensured that he is virtually guaranteed to repeat his mistakes anew.

So, as a public service to the Liberal Party and their leader – as well as any other Punch readers who are planning to disgrace yourselves any time soon - I outline for the first time Definitive Punch Guide to Saying Sorry After Publicly Disgracing Yourself.

1. Dress like you are going to a funeral, not to a disco. Your reputation has just died, so don’t treat it as a casual affair. One national union leader who I worked for had cause for a public apology a few years back and turned up to the press conference in jeans, a look that undermined the gravity of the situation. Within minutes we had swapped trousers (and I can tell you he had been sweating a bit that day). It is a service I only offer clients once.

2. Be more outraged at your action than anyone else in the room. As I mentioned above, the apology is in large part show-business, so it is essential you are more disappointed with your behaviour than anyone else in the room. Try words to the effect that: ‘I have let myself down, my Party down, my supporters down, my family down, humanity down.’

3. Leave some time for anger. This has become the preferred formulation for disgraced footballer. “I know I slept with my team-mate’s wife, I am sorry for that and now I want to move on” We know you want to move on, who wouldn’t? But the genuine apology allows the remorse to hang there until others are prepared to let you move on – and that is usually a couple of laps of the news cycle.

4. Don’t say your opponent was just as bad. This will now go down as the Turnbull play, the attempt to justify your actions by saying he was just as bad. Kevin Rudd made terrible accusations against Alex (can you believe they call him Alex?) Downer and John Howard had copped it just as bad from Rudd over AWB so I can say anything I want about him. This is not the way to hose down an issue.

5. Apologise to your victim, not to your family. It’s fine to go broad with an apology – the Australian people, even the world, but be careful if you narrow it. Matthew Johns missed his chance when he pre-empted Four Corners only to apologise to his wife for the hurt and embarrassment he had caused her rather than the traumatised woman who was about to let anguish rip, reinforcing the point that League players just don’t get it.

6. Apologise for what you did, not that what you did may have upset someone.
One of our former PM’s favourite formulations when he flirted with apologies was to say “I’m sorry if people are upset by what I did or didn’t do ..” Apologising for upsetting people shows you are only concerned about the spin, not about the action that caused the backlash.

7. Offer a ‘revelation’ into your action that makes you a victim too. If you really want to move the story on, make the transgression about something that castes you in an EVEN poorer light. Without trivialising the issue, a number of fallen sports stars have used a scandal to publicly explain their battles with depression or mental illnesses. Some of these fallen idols are now anchoring national TV programs.

8. Don’t take questions – unless they are from Andrew Denton. Finally, if you have made it through the written statement don’t go tempting fate. A pack of journalists will always want more and you always run the risk of undoing your good work. Without the benefit of Andrew Denton’s empathy, it’s just not worth the risk.

For more on apologies go to: http://www.perfectapology.com/ and http://www.psandman.com/articles/busters.htm

Most commented

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      07:39am | 18/08/09

      This will be good advice for Kevin Rudd and his cronies, if they ever manage to pass the lunatic Emissions Trading Scheme.

    • alan says:

      07:46am | 18/08/09

      Arrogant Liberal Party politicians obviously believe ‘scamming’ the Australian public is OK.  Their previous boss got away with it for years!  An apology from Turnbull would mean nothing, in five minutes he’ll be up to the old tricks again.There is no reason an Australian voter should cop this treatment, voting is compulsory in Australia.  If we’re to be subject to the scam, we should be able to choose   to stay away from the polling booth without copping a fine!

    • RT says:

      09:14am | 18/08/09

      First rule of a genuine apology - never mention the word ‘if’ as in ‘I’m sorry IF I offended anyone’. Hey, if you didn’t offend anyone, why are we hearing from you? Saying ‘if’ means the problem is someone else’s.

      Hey Eric - can you tell your pal Mish that we miss her postings? She is not as partisan as you.

    • Eric says:

      09:50am | 18/08/09

      RT—This whole article is about bashing the Liberal Party—and you call *me* partisan?

      I love it when pot calls kettle black.

    • Greensborough Growler says:

      11:26am | 18/08/09

      Pretty good general life advice.

      Only extra is if you are going to apologise mean it. People can smell a BS apology a mile away.

    • RT says:

      11:43am | 18/08/09

      But, Eric, I’m not partisan at all. I’m very equitable in my contempt for all political parties. I couldn’t be bothered having a shot at a particular party in a thread like this but you apparently can’t help yourself.  And if the ETS is passed, guess who’ll probably be helping it pass?

    • Paul says:

      12:05pm | 18/08/09

      Here goes…Eric, I am sorry you have misinterpreted this article

    • Eric says:

      01:55pm | 18/08/09

      Paul, that is garbage.

      You wrote an article ostensibly about apologies, but at every opportunity you bashed Liberals. Really, is there not one example of a Labor politician who should apologise?

      Please don’t try to deny the obvious. Your other articles contain the same partisan bias. At least try to be honest about it.

      You should apologise for pretending to write an article about etiquette, but actually using the opportunity for partisan political bashing.

    • Eric says:

      01:58pm | 18/08/09

      RT, You took a shot at me for suggesting that Labor politicians might want to apologise—while ignoring Peter Lewis’ thousand-word diatribe against Liberals. That is enough to show you for the partisan you are.

    • Paul says:

      02:30pm | 18/08/09

      Haha! Come on Eric, work a bit harder at your comprehension skills old son. Start by looking at my name. Then the writer’s. Now, tell me what you have learned about the article I wrote.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      02:37pm | 18/08/09

      Pretty average Elton John song.

    • RT says:

      02:38pm | 18/08/09

      Eric, only you so far have interpreted this as a ‘1,000 word diatribe against Liberals’ and felt a need to fire back in defence of ‘your side’.  I’m sorry you are such a partisan. There may be remedial courses that can be recommended if you’re interested. if not, I’m sorry for you.

    • Steve B says:

      03:02pm | 18/08/09

      Greensborough Growler says:
      Only extra is if you are going to apologise mean it. People can smell a BS apology a mile away.

      Well said GG.

      I don’t know why it is that so many (admittedly not all) politicians from both sides of the aisle fail to realise that the opinion of the voters is more important than the opinion of their ‘collegues’ from the other side. You really would think that the thoughts of the people deciding if they keep their jobs would hold a little more influence.

      History has shown that us Aussies are for the most part a pretty forgiving people, provided you are willing to at least ‘fess up’ to a transgression.

      I’m not a Liberal supporter, but I don’t believe Mr Turnbull ‘owes’ Mr Rudd an apology, he owes the parliament (and by proxy the voters) an admission of error and perhaps an explanation of how that error was made. But anybody who has actually listened to the workings of parliament would know that accusations of ‘misleading the people and or parliament’ are pretty much a daily occurrence from both sides, the vast majority of which are not only never apologised for, most are never even acknowledged as errors.

    • Eric says:

      03:42pm | 18/08/09

      RT, if you can’t see the total partisanship of this article, then you are either blind or in denial.

      I suggest it is you who needs remedial courses.

    • davido says:

      04:57pm | 18/08/09

      Good advice. I might look to this the next time I have to apologise to the wife.

      Personally I think this is a sackable offence. Turnball should be sacked. In any normal workplace he would be.

    • Adrian says:

      05:07pm | 18/08/09

      It’s not a partisan article - he starts out specific about the Abetz apology, contrasts it with Turnbull’s, and then goes on to give some general advice about the best way to apologise without looking insincere. Using the Abetz and Turnbull apologies as examples is simply a good way to make the article timely and instructive.

      Eric, not everything is a conspiracy.

    • Rosie says:

      04:51pm | 20/08/09

      sorry bit dim here in the UK cos aint got a clue who turnball & abetz are…but hey ho i can live with that…so looking at the article itself…its put across very well, giving good advice on how to get it right…& reading the comments i think some have been in the sun for too long….oh my theres a van outside my house now is it the gasman or am i being watched…lol….

    • the best weightloss says:

      12:39pm | 26/03/10

      Establish Whose,revolution yet death attention chairman unit other sale road distribution be lord sister town competition apart room upper stick therefore directly crisis potential reply extend grant nor cabinet express close obvious warn distinction expenditure time attach adopt yesterday die bank realize weight foot practical burn closely again anyway according front myself anyone recently do secretary lord sir safety museum speak determine grow below memory shop achieve fear unable below would major finally when lack management county else administration admit leader interpretation climb minister species down lord explore base victory slowly succeed

    • Kristin says:

      04:56am | 10/03/12

      Thanks Michael. I knew of his South African past, but did not know the particulars. Sometimes the need to get a post out plecrudes appropriate research.Still I’ve long admired Andrew Murray as a very good parliamentarian, so it was nice to see him honoured for some of his work.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @CrawfordFund: @farrm51 u may like 2 help spread word of our #foodsecurity journo award http://t.co/FwbMWwJmLf

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter