If Matthew Newton’s A Current Affair interview was his opening shot at public redemption, it was a misfire.

Both the actor and A Current Affair seemed to want the Australian public to swallow the troubled star’s “cathartic” TV tell-all and wave him off cheerfully on his road to professional rehabilitation.

But, there was one big thing lacking – free and easy use of the “s” word.

We needed to see Newton acknowledge his behaviour with an uncomfortable honesty, we needed prime-time repentance and we needed a genuine apology.

Instead, we got to see Newton showing Grimshaw a large black bag full of his medication and long, lingering shots of the former Underbelly star wandering around a park looking contemplatively off into the distance.

Time and again Newton went into detail about episodes of self-harm, but skirted specifically acknowledging the hurt he had caused Brooke Satchwell and Rachel Taylor.

Facing Grimshaw, under glaring TV lights, Newton seemed to dodge accepting responsibility for his violent outbursts, instead repeatedly blaming his behaviour on his manic depression.

While Newton’s decision to speak publicly about his struggle with mental illness is commendable, his apologies were watered down by his reflex to blame everything on his disease, not himself.

It was only after prompting from Grimshaw that Newton finally uttered the word everyone had been waiting for.

“Of course I’m sorry,” he said.

But then he added: “My biggest mistake was not knowing I needed treatment sooner than I did.”

This Friday is White Ribbon Day. Courtesy of Newton’s ACA interview, there is little doubt that this week will see renewed public discussion about domestic violence and mental illness.

“People will think what they think and I’m not here to convince anybody of anything,” Newton told Grimshaw.

Right you are, Matthew.

UPDATE: White Ribbon Australia have put out this response to Newton’s interview, arguing that he clearly is not taking enough responsibility for his actions.

On Channel 9s A Current Affair last night, Monday 21st of November, Matthew Newton was interviewed by Host Tracey Grimshaw about his abusive relationships with past girlfriends.

White Ribbon Australia, the largest male-led campaign to stop violence against women, was mentioned in the story.

White Ribbon Australia would like to put forward Ambassador and well-respected Australian expert on gender and sexuality studies from Wollongong University, Dr. Michael Flood, to comment further on this story.

Dr Michael Flood says that Matthew Newton is clearly not taking enough responsibility for his actions:

“Matthew Newton’s story puts the spotlight on some men’s use of violence against women. But it also misleads. Men who’ve abused a partner are more likely to stop if they acknowledge their violent behaviour and the harm it has caused others, make a commitment to change, address their sexist beliefs and sense of entitlement in dominating partners; and seek professional help in perpetrators’ programs,” says Michael.

“So far, Matthew Newton hasn’t done enough to take responsibility for his actions or commit himself to changing them.

“Matthew Newton emphasised the influence of mental illness on his violence. Yes, mental ill health can be a risk factor for violence. But most men who abuse and control their partners aren’t suffering depression or other mental ill health. Instead, they’re using violence because they feel entitled to do so. Their violence is one way they seek to dominate their partners. Men’s violence against women is a symptom of gender inequalities and our culture’s tolerance for violence.”

222 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • RJ says:

      07:32pm | 21/11/11

      I didn’t watch the interview so it’s difficult for me to comment

    • Carz says:

      08:12pm | 21/11/11

      Its available on the ACA website.

    • Lady Runner says:

      08:13pm | 21/11/11

      Apparently not THAT difficult to comment.

    • stephen says:

      08:33pm | 21/11/11

      Well click on the link above and get some second hand news.
      And don’t apologize for what you didn’t do ; you sound like Bob Brown.

    • sophie says:

      09:53pm | 21/11/11

      That gave me the best laugh of the week.

    • Karen says:

      06:37am | 22/11/11

      I must have been watching a different interview, I did see him say sorry a few times. Making fun of a man with obvious mental health issues is a low act and he was honest enough to come on television to explain the lowest point in his life which must have been embarrassing and humiliating.  I guess the ads on Television are not working, the ones that ask people to be more tolerant and accepting of people who, for no fault of their own, have been given this hard road to life with mental illness.  Shame on those who make fun or judge these people, even those in on television.  Well done Matthew for speaking out.

    • Graeme says:

      07:07am | 22/11/11

      Shame on you Daniela,you call yourself a journalist, yet you continued to write your own personal views with very little understanding of mental illness.
      Matthew has no reason at all to say sorry to you or me . The people he has hurt ,his loved ones his family are the one he needs to say sorry to.
      Daniela I’m sorry to say that I am disgusted by your so called views on Matthew.

    • rob says:

      07:34am | 22/11/11

      Wake up Karen, it was all about publicity so he can get his acting career back on track. Save your bleeding heart for someone who deserves it.

    • mark robinson says:

      07:36am | 22/11/11

      Obviously the writer has never suffered from these issues…it’s not a case of ‘taking responsibility….if it was that easy there would be prescious few problems like this around; that’s why it is a problem, because when these illnesses grab you it is at times almost impossible to control…far harder than just writing about it…

    • gg says:

      09:08am | 22/11/11

      Wake up yourself Graeme - she’s not asking for a personal apology. And “So called” views? Wow.

    • Rebecca says:

      09:39am | 22/11/11

      His mental illness is not an excuse. He chose to be violent with his intimate partners, but not with other people. So he did have control over his behaviour. There is a broad spectrum of mental illness. A small proportion of people with mental illness may exhibit violent behaviour. Violence directed to intimate partners/ family only is never a mental health problem. It is Family Violence/ Domestic Violence. Men in particular need to stand up and say this is wrong and stop using mental health and alcohol as an excuse.

    • Madam Bipolar says:

      02:35pm | 22/11/11

      Karen he has committed several low acts, not just one.

    • No excuse for violence says:

      08:35am | 24/11/11

      Karen, I know several people with varying mental health issues, including myself.
      Neither I nor any of those people has used violence or lashed out physically even at the height of our mental illness.
      Newton is using his as a convenient excuse to cover up the fact that he’s a violent thung who thinks it’s ok to beat up women (notice how he’s never bashed a man?).

    • Debbie says:

      07:41pm | 21/11/11

      This guy is a complete creep, blaming everyone except himself for his behaviour. If had not been famous and had famous parents and a very expensive lawyer, he would have gone to jail for those assaults. How long before he does the same thing to another woman, and another and goes on blaming his illness. Depression is not an excuse to behave like a complete drop kick. I have suffered from it too, but managed to avoid beating anyone up. Funny how these were all diagnosed to keep hm out of jail.

    • Lesley says:

      08:05am | 22/11/11

      This person does not just have depression, my daughter suffers mental illness so I know where he is coming from, it is not for us to judge him, at least he is getting help and acknowledges he has a problem.

    • AngelaM says:

      11:00am | 22/11/11

      Manic Depression (now known as bipolar disorder) is different to depression. Tha manic episodes can have psychotic features, whereby the person is really not in touch with reality. Obviously, I do not know & cannot comment on what Matthew Newton may have experienced, however some people who have manic episodes really are not in control of their actions. They legitmately may not be able to take responsibility for what they do when manic.
      I have worked with people who have been devastated & appalled by their own behaviour when the mania has passed. What they can take responsibility for is seeking treatment, & learning to identify the warning signs.

      Matthew Newton may or may not be a spoiled brat, etc, but please - combining uninformed information about mental illness with character judgements does not help anyone, and serves to perpetuate stigma.
      Compassion & education is what is needed.

    • dougZ says:

      02:40pm | 22/11/11

      AngelaM - so why is it that Newton was not in touch with reality or in control of his actions only around women, in particular his intimate partners?  It seems like an unusual form of mental illness that lets the sufferer choose when he will be out of control.

    • Lorraine says:

      04:33pm | 22/11/11

      Many people have mental health issues but   they don’t use the issues as an excuse for abuse of others.
      Matthew has to take responsibility for his actions… now.
      He has made this “apology”  before on Channel Nine. How many episodes of the apology are there?

    • Bill says:

      07:54pm | 21/11/11

      This guy is a weak, pathetic excuse for a human being.

    • Rossco says:

      08:33pm | 21/11/11

      says the guy behind the keyboard who loves judging other people he doesnt know too much about. The guy has a serious mental illness, did you miss that part?

    • Sam says:

      09:43pm | 21/11/11

      Rossco, is it a cause or an excuse?  I think the latter.

    • Sharon says:

      08:14am | 22/11/11

      I agree Bill.  I think this article is very well written and too many people are prepared to support the abuser rather than those he abused.

    • Lady Runner says:

      07:56pm | 21/11/11

      Way too harsh, Daniela.  I thought he was very open and candid about his mental illness and how he now sees in hindsight how damaging it was to himself and others around him. 

      Your comments smack of someone who doesn’t understand the enormity of mental illness

    • Daniella says:

      08:36pm | 21/11/11

      Completely agree with your comments, Daniela you seem very quick to judge someone with serious mental disorders. In no way do I condone his actions however there is something to be said in “blaming” the disease - he was legitimately not of his own mind.  Do some research before making such quick judgements!

    • pete says:

      08:57pm | 21/11/11

      And your comments smack of someone who doesn’t understand this is part of Newton’s PR rehab for his reputation. Early 2009 and we were treated to fawning media treatment and a glossing over of his previous misdeeds when Nine trotted him out in advance of Underbelly.

      But as long as the smokescreen is working for you, enjoy.

    • Ben says:

      10:07pm | 21/11/11

      How is it too harsh to comment that he seemed to be a bit slow to accept responsibility for his actions and apologise for them?  In particular, the apologise bit.  If I get drunk and say or do something that I don’t remember the next day, is really out of character for me, is not something that I would ever do while sober, I don’t go “hey, it’s the alcohol that is to blame, not me” - I say “sorry about that, hopefully you know that is not what I’m really like”.  Which I think is the jist of this article.  You can be sorry for something even if there are other contributing factors for why it happened.

      Or are you saying that by definition, having a mental illness means you are absolved for any future ownership of anything that you did while “under the grasp” of the illness?

      As someone who has been diagnosed manic depressive - I understand the “enormity of mental illness” but I never use it as an excuse for behaving badly.  If Matt is “legitimately not of his own mind” and cannot control himself, then I suggest he be put somewhere that he can be controlled properly - ie, under lock and key.

    • Dan says:

      05:34am | 22/11/11

      What’s with drawing all the parallels between drunkeness and mental illness? Ben - you’re obviously either too young to know the difference, or don’t really suffer too badly from your supposed BP disorder. ‘Lock and Key’ - what a crock.

    • Joan says:

      06:46am | 22/11/11

      I didn’t see the program but it is obvious some viewers judge another in ignorance of meaning of mental illness.  So in ignorance they expect the person with health problem to behave the same way as they do and say sorry . All those throwing barbs at Newton use themselves and their expectations as role models. Their nasty gripes about Newton say a lot about them and its not very nice and I wouldn’t want to look to them for support if needed.  I think Newton is great actor. I hope his health comes good and we can see him on screen again

    • Ben says:

      06:53pm | 22/11/11

      Dan - way to judge, keep up the good work. 

      Maybe it is just that I can actually manage it that is the difference?  I don’t use it as a cop out.  I never directly hurt anyone asides from myself.

      When I was a danger to myself, I was committed.  If other people are a danger to themselves, or others around them, why should they be exempt?

    • Mark says:

      07:58pm | 21/11/11

      Before you place judgement perhaps you should speak with some people that struggle with the daily torment of bipolar disorder or OCD. Only then will you realise the seriousness of his situation and the situation so many of us are in - at least 1% of Australian’s have bipolar disorder, and they are the lucky ones that have actually been diagnosed. Shame on you Daniela Elser.

    • Mark G says:

      08:29pm | 21/11/11

      Yeah but even people with OCD and bipolar can recognise that what they did is wrong. They have trouble controlling it and if unchecked will often offend again but they still know when they are in the wrong. I have a problem not with what he did but rather that he doesn’t seem to accept that he is not the only victim here.

    • Sufferer says:

      09:32pm | 21/11/11

      I have bipolar. I don’t hit people. When I hurt people, I say sorry - I don’t hide behind my disease.

      Illness is illness, sure. But it’s not an excuse.

    • Toady says:

      06:33am | 22/11/11

      Mark is just saying it is his right to act like a total tool - a complete asshole, as he has a mental illness.  No-one has the right to take that right away from him - it is the New Age of self-indulgence.

    • Kate says:

      08:27am | 22/11/11

      I do have OCD, and depression. I still think it’s inexcusable to abuse your partner. Mental illness can have a terrible impact on your moods and behaviour, but it’s still not an excuse for treating others horribly, particularly if this behaviour continues for an extended period of time and you never take the responsibility for seeking help.

    • Sue says:

      08:02pm | 21/11/11

      Why does he have to be sorry for having mental illness? Healing and what he has had to go through both publicly and privately would have been horror, perhaps if you have witnessed or had a traumatic breakdown, you would understand.

    • marley says:

      08:38pm | 21/11/11

      He doesn’t have to be sorry for having a mental illness.  He has to be sorry for physically abusing two women.

    • Kim says:

      02:52pm | 23/11/11

      They’re obviously not seeking an apology for his having manic depression. He assaulted TWO partners and has barely acknowledged either attack, let alone apologised for them - this is why people want an apology.

    • Brian says:

      08:03pm | 21/11/11

      The problem with articles like this is they tend to ingrain a false sense of “entitlement” to people. As a viewer of the television interview you are no more entitled to a genuine “Sorry” than any one else EXCEPT his victims. This was an interview with an actor, nothing more, nothing less.

      Although I think Newton himself is a low life scumbag, The fact that you think as a viewer you are entitled to an emotional heartfelt plea shows that you are as far removed from reality as the shows he acts in.

      Get a grip on reality please before you write another article

    • Bec says:

      08:57pm | 21/11/11

      EXACTLY what I was thinking. Well said

    • Paddy says:

      09:13pm | 21/11/11

      Brian, I love your comment. You are 100% right that he owes us no apology, only the victims.

      But I must say, by allowing himself to be interviewed, is he not inviting the audience to judge him and form an opinion. He has asked for our time hoping we would judge him favorably in return. He should thus also accept unfavorable criticism, and also note that he would gain more favour by accepting responsibility rather than blaming his illness.

    • Anna says:

      12:04am | 22/11/11

      He owes me no apology, sure, but he spoke publicly about his his issues without showing remorse, and apparently that is all fine, because he owes me nothing? He showed a lack of remorse, I can judge that.

      If it matters, I suffer from mental illness.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      06:30am | 22/11/11

      Marley, as usual, makes a very good point! She says it all really but sadly the likes of Grimshaw and his family influence will see him back in a staring role on Channel 9 on a pay scale better than those who haven’t bashed any women. One of the worst aspects of his behaviour is that he avoided a conviction by an easily manipulated court system,an influential family and a lawyer prepared to buy a medical report in his favour.

    • Big Ted says:

      07:24am | 22/11/11

      He owes no-one an apology - unless he wants us to watch him on television again you mean - and unless he wants the money that results from that. In which case he owes EVERY potential customer an apology. He knows that - which is why he did the “interview” (aka PR exercise). The author isn’t “removed from reality” - she has a far better appreciation of the commercial world than you.

    • Nic says:

      09:02am | 22/11/11

      That doesn’t mean he “Owes” it to the potential customers. It means he knows that they’re entitled idiots who feel they need to be part of his life and personally forgive him.

      Thus that an apology would sell them a redemption story.

      They’re not owed or entitled to anything. The author never mentions this, she seems to fall directly into the same “Why didn’t you say sorry to me!?” heap as the rest of the masses.

    • dougZ says:

      02:45pm | 22/11/11

      so we’re back to Big Ted’s point, Nic - the ‘interview’ was nothing but a PR exercise.  If he doesn’t care what the customers think, then why bother?

    • mr enigma says:

      04:50pm | 22/11/11

      My thoughts exactly

    • Mark G says:

      08:06pm | 21/11/11

      All I heard of this was “I’m a victim, i’m a victim, i’m a victim”. There was no sorry, just him saying how bad his life is. I agree, this doesn’t raise much sympathy from me yet.

    • sharon says:

      08:17am | 22/11/11

      It was nauseating and all too common for an abuser to portray themselves as a victim.  I feel sad reading all the comments supporting him, what about the women who were beaten by him, does their fear and pain not count?

    • Anonymous Doug says:

      08:07pm | 21/11/11

      “Facing Grimshaw, under glaring TV lights, Newton seemed to dodge accepting responsibility for his violent outbursts, instead repeatedly blaming his behaviour on his manic depression.

      While Newton’s decision to speak publicly about his struggle with mental illness is commendable, his apologies were watered down by his reflex to blame everything on his disease, not himself.”

      A man that is mentally ill went on TV in front of the whole country and admitted he was wrong and apologised for his past behaviour. If the author of this article knew anything about Mental Illness, she would not make such stupid comments in regards to Mr. Newton.

    • Classic says:

      05:25am | 22/11/11

      Everyone who does something wrong these days has a mental illness and anyone whop criticises them “clearly doesn’t know “anything about Mental Illness”.  There’s no bravery in Newton’s apprearance on TV, only self-serving PR spin delivered by an actor.

    • Alex says:

      08:09pm | 21/11/11

      In my opinion, violence against women is inexcusable. Each case is different, but unless Matthew Newton has a learning disability, no matter how ill a person gets it’s one of those things you learn at a young age you never do. It’s in the same category of taboo for most people as bestiality or cannibalism. If either Rachael or Brooke were my sister/daughter I’d find it difficult to want anything more for him than jail, and privately, much worse.

    • Wisdom Is Rare says:

      08:35pm | 21/11/11

      The world does not only revolve around women you know.

    • Alex says:

      10:34pm | 21/11/11

      no aspect of my comment suggests that it does!

    • Sharon says:

      08:19am | 22/11/11

      As a sister and daughter who lived many years with frightening abuse it is really wonderful to read comments like yours.  thank you

    • stephen says:

      08:12pm | 21/11/11

      But if drugs were legalized, wouldn’t this sort of thing be unheard of ?

      Matthew Newton was an addict, and the drugs have ruined, for now at least, his career and his good name.
      Irrespective of his feelings, or not, of guilt and remorse, his behaviour has damaged severely those people who once liked and trusted him, and now, as if he is still acting and in character, expects us to believe that he is OK now, because, you know, we are all, in some way, victims.
      Cause and effect, he should know, is not only for inanimate objects ; there is also a thing called responsibility ... after the fact, and act, too.

      Nothing’s sunk in yet.
      Let’s hope that in his next job, he gets a tough Director, (and probably, as payback, a female one.)

    • Jason K says:

      05:26am | 22/11/11

      Good point about the drugs, he was hardcore into them apparently, alot of ice. But it’s all about the mental illness isnt it.

      I’d never want to be near the guy again personally. Too risky on everyone.

    • John Ph says:

      08:29am | 22/11/11

      I would say having lived in a priviledged lifestyle he has the sense of a spoilt kid. Mental ilness is caused by both stress and illegal drugs. A public apology caused by a public lynching was necessary. But as far as acting as a career goes. He’s shown he cant take pressure. Learn a trade and get on with your life. If you can after the major screw up. No one in the public will forget what you did unless you do.

    • Lilly says:

      08:14pm | 21/11/11

      To do it on tabloid television, to me, means that whole line of spin (aka the interview) is complete bullcrap.

      He’s not sorry, he wants people to give him a go because he has another acting gig in the pipeline.

      How about actually doing good first, then p a completely **independent** doco after about 5 years. Not some pandering piece by the network that kisses your father’s backside.

    • Diane says:

      06:59am | 22/11/11

      I agree Lilly - he just wants to get back into acting.  The ACA interview was just a performance piece for him.  He skirted any issues he didn’t want to deal with.  What rubbish to say he was only trying to hurt himself and not the other people!!  Crawl back into your hole, Matthew.

    • Carz says:

      08:15pm | 21/11/11

      “I glad that you asked all the questions because they need to be asked.”

      Sure they were asked. Shame they weren’t answered. What a narcissistic piece of work he is. I have lived with a person with mental illness, with bi-polar disorder. While accepting that every person is different the illness doesn’t excuse being a world class bastard who can’t control your fists.

    • Daniel says:

      08:28pm | 21/11/11

      This ACA interview was in usual style. A total utter Joke. “Newton vs Grimshaw” please. I think the guy does have issues but if he stays on his pills he will be fine.

    • stephen says:

      08:58pm | 21/11/11

      Not half as bad as Indonesia’s Dr. Marty on the ABC who reckons we shouldn’t feel too bad at our northern neighbour’s aghast at our impertinance ... and then I swapped channels and saw an even sillier apologist.

    • yvette says:

      08:29pm | 21/11/11

      Daniela why dont you google manic depression and then you may see he has every right to blame his behaviour on it.He is now medicated for it said publically sorry so get off his back.

    • Jess says:

      10:42pm | 21/11/11

      So would you trust him not to bash you if you were his girlfriend.
      Do you think having a mental illness gives you the excuse to bash someone. Is it less damaging to the victim if the basher is mentally ill.

    • Rossco says:

      08:30pm | 21/11/11

      And what would a sorry on tv prove Daniela? If anything, it would seem fake and put on just for tv sakes. I believe Newton maintained some format of dignity and respect throughout the whole thing. The guy has a serious mental issue and is getting help.

    • Dr Sam says:

      12:55pm | 22/11/11

      Rossco you may buy his PR spin and turning-over-a-new-leaf bullshit, but any individual with a memory longer than a fishes would have heard it before.

      He wants the public to accept him and put his various violent indiscretions behind. Not possible without apologizing for what he did instead of hiding behind his illness as an excuse and shifting blame to others.

      I agree though - a sorry won’t help at all as far as I’m concerned his career is DEAD.

    • Nic says:

      08:35pm | 21/11/11

      I care for a bipolar sufferer, My wife.

      She is a beautiful loving human being and in no way does she want to behave in the way she does,  after caring for her full time for the last 2 years I can clearly see the illness is fully to blame for her actions in life and she in no way would ever ask to be like this, she even asks for the medicine to help manage her illness.

      Matt Newton you are a brave man going public about your illness, lead the way young man with awareness of this insidious disease and lets hope for better medical treatment in the future.

      Nobody would hit a person in the chest who is having a heart attack ? Why then do people hit out at those with mental illness ?

    • nick says:

      06:51am | 22/11/11

      He is a goose…. but dont worry he will recover and be on tv when he belts up his next overseas girlfriend.  He is a spoilt brat .

    • whatever says:

      09:13am | 22/11/11

      A person having a heart attack isn’t bashing his girlfriends. Girlfriends PLURAL. He didn’t seek help after the first time.

    • Finch says:

      08:36pm | 21/11/11

      I work in this field and mental illness is rarely the reason for domestic violence in my experience. Amazing how often celebrities, entrepeneurs, magistrates and other high flyers seem to suddenly confess to suffering from mental illness, invariably some type of “mood disorder”, when they are in serious trouble over their misbehaviour. Seems to be awfully convenient sometimes.

      I have seen many men who suffer from major mental illness and hardly any of them ever bashed those they professed to love. The few who did blamed themselves and not their illness. On the other hand I have seen many women who have suffered from domestic violence and hardly any of them were victims of mentally ill lovers or partners, they were most often bashed by someone who was frequently intoxicated with alcohol or amphetamines, sometimes by a person who became violent after a serious brain injury, and the remainder were unlucky enough to have found a partner who was simply violent by nature.

    • Kel says:

      11:05pm | 21/11/11

      Sorry. My father had a mental illness and he was violent and abusive to all of us, in many ways. He never admitted he was ill. He never gave remorse either. For you to say it’s rare, it doesn’t even add comfort. It took an order for psychiatric assessment to figure out what was wrong. By then, it was too late.

    • Jordan says:

      09:32am | 22/11/11

      I find it concerning that someone who “works in this field” thinks its appropriate to put “mood disorder” in scare quotes.

    • Lee says:

      08:37pm | 21/11/11

      This article and numerous comments here show a complete ignorance and lack of compassion for those with a mental illness such as Matthew’s.  There are people who can not control certain behaviours when they’re in an agitated or anxious state so to say “he should blame himself not his disease” shows a lack of understanding.  This is one of those cases where it sucks for everyone involved: the ex-girlfriends, the families, Matthew Newton, those who care about all of them.  And for those of you saying “I’ve had depression, I didn’t beat people up”—I guarantee your ‘depression’ is absolutely nothing compared to what others (like Matthew) have to live with.

      Until the attitudes of the author and commenters here are a thing of the past, those with mental illness will continue to be judged, discriminated against and never accepted by society.

    • James says:

      07:58am | 22/11/11

      I have an issue understanding how bashing a partner’s head into the floor could be deemed acceptable to the point where the protagonist feels it was not their fault, and they are not directly responsible.

      Mental illness or not.

      When do people accept some responsiblity for their own actions, without blaming it on their “illness” particularly when they have behaved in a similar fashion before and presumably been diagnosed.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:39pm | 21/11/11

      Urgh the mental illness card. The hypocricy of social standards is shocking sometimes. Under the prism of Penbo’s recent article, this is a joke. That man kevin was likely to have had some sort of mental illness. His wife killed him prior to him getting a diagnosis or treatment. He is a monster? She is a hero? Matt is brave? Well maybe Kevin was just undiagnosed brave? I don’t think so.

      Matt newton deserves the ability to dissolve into the real world and get on with his life. I for one have had a gutfull of the double standards. He should seek treatment for his issues. Should he be praised for doing that and should it be some sort of excuse for his behaviour? Fk no.

    • Stiffy says:

      05:58am | 22/11/11

      “He should seek treatment for his issues” - Where do you think he has been for the past 9 months.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:03am | 22/11/11

      Poorly worded on my part sorry. I was simply trying to reinforce the fact that he should not be “rewarded” and “praised” for doing something that he *should* be doing anyway.

      And he should be slammed when he falls off the wagon and [his illness] smashes his girlfriends face into some marble in Italy… because if he repeatedly fails himself and those around him and we all dust him off and say “now now, that wasn’t your fault, here is some money to do an interview on ACA” - WTF does that tell other people who have mental illnesses? It tells them that there is no accountability for some people. He deserves a chance to form a life for himself, and the faith of his family and friends that he can change with the management of his illness - but this rediculous response by the media et al does not seek to favourably educate the general public as to what it is like to really live with a mental illness.

    • Mahhrat says:

      09:02am | 22/11/11

      @Fairs - agree totally.  I see it this way:  Should I be rewarded for losing weight (beyond the better health I’ll enjoy), given I have the illness of morbid obesity?

      Of course not. I should be healthy because it’s right to be healthy.

      Mr Newton should not be lauded for “seeking help”, he should be told simply, “Good to hear,” and then left to get on with it.

      What this does is simply reinforces the idea that we’re all “special”.  We are not.  seeking help for your problems is simply the right thing to do; it’s not deserving of a reward.

    • Horns Up says:

      09:07am | 22/11/11

      A fairly simplistic view of mental illness. People with these sorts of sicknesses do not wake up one day and say “hey, I’m mentally ill I should seek treatment”. My mate didn’t really know how sick he was until he tried to put a knife into his own heart.

      \m/

    • Steph says:

      08:40pm | 21/11/11

      I found this interview absolutely disgusting to watch. Matthew Newton just seemed to try to justify and excuse his behaviour and seemed to take no responsibility for it. He refused to even admit to many of the acts of which he’s been accused.
      Tonight’s interview felt like the first step by Channel Nine in what will be a long effort to restore his reputation. It seemed like empty showmanship that exploited mental illness as an excuse for truly abhorrent behaviour in the form of domestic violence.
      I cannot understand why celebrities who are accused of these acts are so often forgiven - look at Chris Brown, for example. The public too quickly forgives and forgets as violent men go from one success to another. It’s disgusting.

    • Big Ted says:

      07:19am | 22/11/11

      Well said Steph - and so true. Maybe the interview would’ve had more credibility if it was on the ABC or any other network other than Nine. As it turns out it came across as little more than a PR exercise for one of Channel 9’s talent. Yes he has a mental illness - but he stil needs to take responsibility for what he did.

    • pete says:

      08:44pm | 21/11/11

      Anyone of a ‘lesser’ form of employment or family would have been cast adrift long ago, but nope we have to suffer Newton’s ongoing excuses beamed into our living rooms, just so he’s completed the superficial circle of redemption and can have his acting career again.

      Seriously Newton, bugger off. I’m sure someone who owes your daddy a favour will give you a job driving a Channel Nine satellite truck, but I have no interest in watching you slither across my TV screen again.

    • JandK says:

      08:45pm | 21/11/11

      I live in Rozelle. I recall seeing young Brook Satchwell looking both ‘haunted’ and lost at our local Post Office and, that was before the first problem. Not wanting to encroach her private space I probably, like many others, said nothing - I forever will regret that.
      Somebody murdered my own sister years ago - that fellow actually had balls and apologised for the trauma he had caused to me and to many others…
      The health system said of that man - he was ‘cured’.... so he became free.
      As it so often happens - years later that man has been recalled back to custodial care - he was not cured after all? Just cunning!

      Newton - sorry but I am like so many people… he blew his chances and really needs to quietly go elsewhere, and off our screens - gone where we can all forget his manner and give thanks that neither young lady was killed by his bursts of insanity.
      Grow up and Go away - Show genuine compassion for your victims whom you may have hurt for life.

    • James Shaw says:

      08:51pm | 21/11/11

      Umm why would he apologise on ACA? Did he wrong Tracey Grimshaw or the viewers of ACA? I really don’t see the point of your article other than to take another easy shot at the guy.

      I don’t know enough about the incidents Matt Newton was involved in however I assume he owes (and may well have given) and apology to Brooke S and Rachel T ... I still don’t understand how that relates to aologising to ACA

    • devilsman60 says:

      09:13pm | 21/11/11

      So many experts in this world!

    • Phill says:

      09:24pm | 21/11/11

      Blame the interviewer/producer for being a chump, because we all know ACA and T/T haven’t piss poor standards for journalistic integrity.

    • Dorry says:

      09:26pm | 21/11/11

      Apart from the mental illness - Matthew Newton showed all the signs of meth-amphetamine abuse which may or may not have contributed to his violent outbursts. 

      My advice to him would be stay clean, stay away from the media - go grow some veggies and raise some goats on a remote property for a while and contemplate honestly the heartache caused to partners and parents and god know who else who had to put up with the arsehole behaviour.

    • Argus says:

      09:27pm | 21/11/11

      Newton gives sufferers of this illness a bad name! Having bipolar disorder doesn’t stop you from knowing right and wrong nor taking responsibility for your behaviour - violent or otherwise. How else is he going to recover if he doesn’t take ownwership?! He just wants a media whitewash courtesy of his mates at Channel 9.

    • BPD says:

      06:54am | 22/11/11

      Argus - from the tone of the comments here, I think those with mental illness already have a bad name, regardless of the Newton interview. Apparently we’re just self indulgent new-agers who use it as an excuse for all our behaviour.

    • Aaron says:

      09:29pm | 21/11/11

      (The follow isn’t correct, nor would i harm myself or anyone)

      —-I am alcoholic and I struggle with mental illness, manic depression just like Matt. I’m—-abusive to my family where to the point i’ll will snap as soon as i walk in the door, it’ll take—-me 3 beers to calm down.

      I’m sorry. Does this count too Tracey?... NO! HELL NO!

      Why because you’ve painted a picture of me, that I am bad person. and say sorry doesn’t count, we can all say the ‘s’ word too easy these days or blame what ever it is. Its about time Mummy and Daddy stopped spoon feeding this brat and kick into the real world, Nothing is an excuse from beat up your girlfriend(s) Matt.

    • Blasp says:

      09:33pm | 21/11/11

      I don’t believe you can ever cure mental illnessses.  When you have one you will always have to live with it.  You can treat it, and lessen the symptoms and this doesn’t necessarily have to be with Drugs.

      Anxiety is a perfect example of this.  The drugs that I took have helped reach a level of Self management, so I don’t need them anymore, I use other forms of treatment like exposure therapy and relaxation techniques.

      A lot of mental illnesses are so closet linked.  Anxiety OCD depression etc.

      I can fully understand all the crap and stuff that Matthew was talking about going round in his head, and can understand how people can get too a stage where he was at.  A turning point comes when you realise you a sick of living that way.  It’s just a shame the wake up call didn’t come early enough for Matthew and everyone he has affected.

      Judging by the interview.  I can tell by the way he was behaving, he still has a long way to go and will prbly have to go back into hospital next year for another stay. 
      He will never be fully cured.  He will just learn to manage the illness better.

    • Andrew says:

      03:57am | 22/11/11

      Good post.

    • Brandon-seen too much says:

      09:47pm | 21/11/11

      You all fail to understand mental illness if you believe that Newton is wrong for blaming his behaviour on it.

    • All Your Base Are Belong to Us says:

      10:03pm | 21/11/11

      What a butthead.

      I have PTSD, major depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and IBS.

      Surprisingly, I don’t hit women. I hold down a full time job. I have a relationship. I hit the bottle more than I should, but considering what the majority blame mental illnesses on, I think I’m doing pretty good.

    • BPD says:

      07:04am | 22/11/11

      Not many mentally ill, functioning alcoholics could hold down a full time job and a relationship. For some, those illnesses are severe enough that they can barely leave the house every day.  Like many commenting here, I’m not suggesting we condone Newton’s behaviour, merely respect that his situation is more complex than being a ‘butthead’ who ‘chooses’ to hit women.

    • karen says:

      10:13pm | 21/11/11

      whatever illness he is suffering, just dont hit a woman again, try hitting a beefy guy.

    • Ian says:

      10:31pm | 21/11/11

      He’d be an unknown if it wasn’t for his parents.  Methinks he has trouble reconciling that.

    • stephen says:

      11:07pm | 21/11/11

      I don’t agree.
      I saw him in Underbelly and I thought he was good.
      He appears quite clever, but was hasn’t sunk in yet is that a person of talent should take life more seriously, (we keep hearing ‘we shouldn’t take life seriously,’ as though, if we actually do, and we’re found out as dunces, well, there goes our entire credibility ... cowardly, I say, as if confidence and a bit of luck counts for nothing.)
      Serious and strong people, especially in the acting profession, I would think, should have the highest pride.
      He should now become the person he wants to be.

    • Andrew says:

      03:58am | 22/11/11

      You may think it, Ian, but you don’t know it.

    • McNaughton's rules says:

      10:39pm | 21/11/11

      Bipolar is not associated with increasing violence.  That is a separate issue.

    • Damian says:

      10:39pm | 21/11/11

      Matthew Newton didnt need to apologise the interview was about mental illness not his bashing of rachel taylor but as your a women you will hold this against him and not see the real issue - its mental illness awarness month - lets support the issue of mental illness - and leave the other garbage alone for a little - matthew newton doesnt need to apologise to the public or you, because you and the public want forgive him anyway… get over yourself

    • Portia says:

      10:55pm | 21/11/11

      If a person with diabetes lashed out into a violent attack as a result of low blood sugar ( I am the mother of a placid child with type 1 diabetes who can turn demonic and full of rage if his blood sugar levels plummet) - they would be forgiven for their behaviour, because it was fuelled by a medical problem.
      Matthew’s problems are as legit as any other medical condition - I felt that he was candid, open and very brave to speak about a topic that is still very taboo, even though much progress has been made about understanding mental illness. He doesn’t owe Australia an apology. I’m so disappointed to read that so many people are so quick to judge, and are unable to open their minds.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      10:06am | 22/11/11

      If you believe your sons rage is caused by his low sugar levels alone then you are delusional Portia. There would be an underlying mental or other problem causing such rage. I have had diabetes for 20 years and i know dozens of people who also suffer from it. Low sugar doesn’t cause a situation as you have described , bad temper and other disorders are responsible. If someone is having a Hypo then i doubt they would have the energy to fly into a “demonic” state - more likely to be upset with a Hypa or high sugar levels. Seek some professional help for the kid in addition to his diabetes assistance.

    • K says:

      11:03pm | 21/11/11

      For all those people carrying on about how “they don’t know what it is like to suffer mental illness so we should judge” i say blah blah blah!  Sure when some people go through depression they can be horrible to those they love.  I was.  One of the first things you learn when recovering though is taking responsibility for your actions, the good and the bad, and realising that you do have control over your behaviour and your emotions.  Depression is a mental illness, not an excuse.

    • Vicki PS says:

      11:03pm | 21/11/11

      Just because you’re manic depressive, doesn’t mean you’re not an aggressive arsewipe.  People with mental illness are just as likely as the rest of us to be creeps or charmers, as the case may be.  (I have a daughter with bipolar disorder).

    • Chris says:

      11:39pm | 21/11/11

      As a mother of a troubled son, I admire Matts courage and honesty.
      He is an intelligent and talented actor and I hope the future will be better for him.
      Everybody deserves the chance to recover and move on.

    • Trav says:

      11:41pm | 21/11/11

      The article and a lot of the comments are typical of the ignorance towards mental illness. Grow up and get educated because when the black dog comes calling, it knows no mercy. You will undoubtedly face the same prejudice and at a time when it can really mess with your head. I feel sympathy for all of the people involved. Just remember, mental illness favours nobody !!

    • Andy says:

      12:00am | 22/11/11

      I suffer from bi-polar, OCD and a sever personality disorder and most people I know blame my actions on my mental illnesses. I don’t really agree with them. I make choices based on what I believe and stick by them.
      He shouldn’t have to say sorry for hitting women - women are just as equal as men. I have hit many woman in the past, partners included and do not feel remorseful for it - they deserved it and I felt better for doing it. Why are woman treated as off limits for violence? I mean really, why? because they are smaller? Because they have nice fingernails?

    • rob says:

      07:54am | 22/11/11

      Wow, Andy, what a tough guy you are.

    • August says:

      03:59am | 22/11/11

      Hey, if it was good enough for John Howard ...

    • Corangamite says:

      03:59am | 22/11/11

      The guy is a D grade celebrity who may or may not have a problem, but he certainly has family money and a television network trying to paint him as hard done by and now reinvent him.  How did he avoid gaol?  A young friend who did much less than Newton got 200 hours of a Community Service Order which is very demanding and now has a criminal record - not so for little Mattie though.

      How about some true journalistic analysis of why ACA did a piece on Newton rather than some Joe Blow who has a similar problem.  Reminds me of the article from Caroline Wilson where she said we didn’t understand Eddie McGuire rather than some true focus on his conflicts, biases, aggression and ego.

    • Andrew says:

      06:26am | 22/11/11

      What you think his status is as a “celebrity” is utterly irrelevant, Corangamite, but you make it sound like a judgement. Weird.

    • Dan says:

      05:28am | 22/11/11

      This story is a complete insult to anyone with serious mental illness. The author obviously has no idea what it’s like to be so ashamed of your own identity you wish you didn’t exist. I’d never condone violence towards women, but blaming the disorder rather and accepting you are inherently a good person is the only way to move on.

    • Stiffy says:

      05:29am | 22/11/11

      It was interesting just how long the interview went without an ad break. ACA timing is interesting also with his ex flying back home today.

      There are many differing types of mental illness. Some make a person violent. I have seen a very close member of my family go thru something similar. His illness cost him everything and even with medication, it eventually cost him his life. Drugs and alcohol brought on his psychosis.

      To run down the street and try to punch his boxing champion neighbor for just driving home goes a long way to explain that this guy was very sick.

      To say he feels about 6 out of 10 shows he still has a long way to go. I think he is a great talent. We have seen so many good actors battle with mental illness.

      I don’t think he needs to make any public apology.

    • CiscoKid says:

      05:54am | 22/11/11

      Just another spoilt brat suffering LOFD.

    • Sally says:

      05:59am | 22/11/11

      Friggen hell there’s some awful people on this planet. Give the guy a break. How would you feel if it was you, a member of your family, or a close friend? Honestly. Reading some of these negative comments, one would be led to believe you are all perfect, when in actual fact, statistics show that half of you have some mental illness. God help you all.

    • Emma says:

      07:13am | 22/11/11

      Oh the irony in this statement.

      So he can beat up two women, within an inch of their lives, and nobody can criticise him for it?  Really?

      Having a mental illness in most cases, if you knew anything about it, does not absolve you of any responsibility.  If you believe this PR spin you’re the one who needs help.  Stop being so naive.

      And I’m guessing if somebody ever physically assaulted you, you wouldn’t be sitting here all self righteous.  It’s not about being perfect, it’s about not crossing the line, which most of us don’t do.  It’s one thing to shout at somebody when you’re angry, it’s another thing entirely to severely assault two people, much smaller than you, who can’t fight back.

      I really hope this doesn’t happen to you.

    • Sally says:

      10:14am | 22/11/11

      Reply to Emma - I was a victim of domestic violence (both physical and mental) throughout my 18 year marriage, and I have battled reactive depression for years, but hey, what would I know? People like you need to learn to understand this illness, and not be too quick to lay blame over and over and over again if someone does something wrong. When do you stop the blame? grow up.

    • Kate says:

      11:49am | 22/11/11

      It has been me, on both counts.
      It’s been me in the sense that I have a mental illness, and it’s been me in the sense that I had an abusive ex-boyfriend.
      I do strange things on account of having OCD, and sometimes it causes irrational anger, but I would never use that as an excuse for belting somebody. Matthew Newton did not just lash out once - he systematically abused his partner, both verbally and physically, over 12 months. That’s a very long period to recognise you have a problem and seek help, and he failed to do that until he got caught. That does not indicate remorse to me.

    • John B says:

      06:02am | 22/11/11

      Blame it on the booze.. blame it on the drugs… blame it on the illness… blame it on society… blame it on the pressures of being a total irresponsible idiot. Just blame it on something already!!! Everyday we see thugs, murderers, rapists, thieves and all manner of lowlifes getting out of jail for these reasons. It truly is society’s fault!

    • GG says:

      06:06am | 22/11/11

      Daniela Elser - you really are scraping the bottom of the barrel with this headline aren’t you? If you knew anything at all about mental illness, you wouldn’t be an ‘entertainment’ ‘reporter’ that writes crap articles. I got to the end of your article, and looked for page 2, but there was none. What exactly was your point? The fact that he told us what he went through? What he put others through? What he has done to help himself and those around him? What exactly is your problem? But who cares, hey, anything for an “angle”. Utter rubbish.

    • Sally says:

      06:13am | 22/11/11

      Nothing but a big steaming pile of PR. I am guessing that within the fortnight they will announce he is in a new show.

    • Yawn says:

      06:19am | 22/11/11

      Am I the only person who just doesn’t care about Matthew Newton?  Haven’t newspapers got more important things to report?

    • Negative Ned says:

      06:20am | 22/11/11

      Mathew has some very serious issues that need to be addressed professionally. What is of no value to anyone with personal experience with events such as these, victim or not, is negative sensationalist “journalism”. I went through the last dozen articles that Daniela Elser has put her name to; yes she has experience, but also showing trends that she’s becoming (wittingly or not) part of the self serving media machine.

      Don’t get me wrong, good luck to Daniela for carving out a career, but heed your audience more so than the executives that pay your wages. Sure, it’s a harder road, but professional respect (and dollars) will come.

      Report! ...becuase who cares about the opinion of someone they don’t know!
      ...oops sorry! I forgot this was entertainment ...I still want my money back!

    • The Oracle says:

      06:21am | 22/11/11

      What is grimshaw doing a pathetic rigged pathetic interview like this?
      This appeared as a publicity shot for him,as if he is the only hard done by person and it is not his fault. current affair you have lost me and grimshaw any respect i had for you has gone ,you have lost credibility sitting with this weak,wimp of a person. Like bingle i wish he would just fade away as he apparently wants sympathy and you endorsed it .

    • nfw says:

      06:21am | 22/11/11

      This is not news.  He is quoted as saying “I wish I were somebody else”.  I wish he were somebody else then we wouldn’t have to put up with the commercial on Nine about him.  What a waste of space and oxygen thief.  Grow up, stop whingeing & whining, get a real job and fade into society as what you are, a nobody. As for ACA et al, how about real news and reporting work being done in Australia to make life better?  Hah, real work and scientific endeavour is not real news for them; most of them wouldn’t understand. It’s just a video version of a women’s magazine; after all that’s all it is doing, just providing an ad for stable partner mags.  This rubbish is what a media enquiry should be about.

    • Boris says:

      06:51am | 22/11/11

      Matt is an excellent actor. You only need to watch this interview to see that.

    • Rose99 says:

      06:52am | 22/11/11

      I don’t condone his behaviour at all, but he is damned
      if he does and damned if he doesn’t.
      All his life he has had to try and prove himself
      regardless of how much talent he may have.
      because he is ‘Berts’ son.
      I commend him for giving the interview, if anyone
      actually saw it, he did say he was sorry, but why apologize
      to the public, it it Rachel and Brooke who
      he needs to apologize to, and it is up to them
      - not us to accept.
      In time he will be forgiven by the ‘industry’
      and the ‘public’ as long as he sticks to
      his meds and therapy, for Bipolar sufferers
      that can be difficult to do, so Matt, it’s up to you.
      Prove everyone wrong and make your parents proud.

    • Steve says:

      06:59am | 22/11/11

      I do not denigrate mental problems. However, in this case, I can’t help but notice that none of this man’s “episodes” seem to happen when he’s near some 190cm 150kg man. Coincidence? I think not!

    • Check your facts says:

      08:06am | 22/11/11

      Not True. He gave a specific example of taking on a champion boxer when he drove fast down his road. Matthew ended up in hospital. Get your facts right (as should many others posting comments here). He abused himself more than other people, its just that the media only tell you about the times he abused his partners.

    • Stiffy says:

      02:28pm | 22/11/11

      No one in their right mind would attack a boxing champion.

    • TCM says:

      06:48pm | 22/11/11

      And where is this mysterious “boxing champion” he attacked? You think Channel 7 would have tracked him down by now if he existed - or any of the other guys he suggests he fought bravely? Hang on - did he actually attack the boxing champion or just get angry at him.  Newton was conveniently fuzzy on his recollection of this. No he attacked women and only women.

    • You try dealing with them says:

      07:06am | 22/11/11

      I think this editor needs to remove herself from her perfect world to go spend time dealing with people who suffer from mental related disorder.

    • Emma says:

      07:08am | 22/11/11

      My mother had a mental illness and she physically abused me until I was 7 years old.  i guess I should have been more sympathetic, how cruel and unreasonable of me.  Funny how neither my mother nor Matthew Newton ever picked on anybody their own size who could fight back – doesn’t anybody ever wonder that?  Obviously there is an ability to control this behaviour at certain times.  Funny that.

      I would imagine all of these people standing by this person have never had to witness it first hand.  Easy to sit in your armchairs and spout ignorant cliches about ‘mental illness’ and how ‘people can’t help their behaviour’.  Sorry, but most of us, including those with mental illness, are responsible and accountable for our behaviour, no matter how confronting that might be to some of you.  That would be exactly what Matthew Newton would have been told by his psychiatric team when he has treatment - setting limits and to take responsibility.

      He’s an antisocial, narcissistic, angry, spoiled little brat – that’s his personality, not a set of symptoms.  Anyone could be diagnosed with a mental illness if you show the right set of symptoms, in the right situation, and have a rich family a lawyer willing to sell his soul to the devil to get you off.
      FYI - to those very literal commenters ‘wondering’ why he has to say sorry - it has nothing to do with the general public or Tracey bloody Grimshaw.  Saying sorry means you accept responsibility for what you did with blaming anything else - an important part of becoming rehabilitated and well.  Something which seems to be a dying art these days, given the number of people defending him.

    • Louisa says:

      07:46am | 22/11/11

      Well said, Emma. A dear friend of mine’s eldest son suffers from mental illness. He can get violent sometimes and on a few occasions they have had to call the police to help deal with the situation (they have nothing but praise for the way the police have helped them). When he is violent, he lashes out at ANYONE who happens to be there at the time, including his stepfather and brothers. Funny how he doesn’t just restrict that violence to his much smaller mother.
      Newton has had a free ride through much of his life; he is a spoiled brat who has had way too many people willing to excuse and cover up behaviour that should have been dealt with long ago. That interview showed he still doesn’t ‘own’ his behaviour. Mental illness or not, it’s all-too-obviously a PR exercise.

    • rob says:

      08:01am | 22/11/11

      The best comment on here, well said Emma.

    • anti bully says:

      01:58pm | 13/04/12

      Hallelujah

    • Bee-Bee says:

      07:12am | 22/11/11

      interesting how he suffers from a mental illness that makes him ‘crazy’ yet he only hit women. His ‘insanity’ apparently left him with enough sensibility not to take on ..oh anyone bigger than him.

    • Misha says:

      07:26am | 22/11/11

      I must say, the phenomenon of many cashed-up ‘celebrities’ instantly suffering from mental illness upon breach of a law (and an appearance in court) is not only insulting to us as a society - but mostly insulting to the hundreds of thousands of Australians who really do suffer from mental illness. Disgraceful. Its should not be abused as a get out of jail free card when others are suffering with a life sentence of illness. Pessimistic? Perhaps - but why are they only ever pushed to get treatment once in court, but not at life-threatening (other) junctures? Do not want to see this guy on my screen again.

    • BP2 says:

      07:36am | 22/11/11

      well as someone with bi-polar II disorder, I’d say that is what Newton has.  Bipolar I is a very acute disorder. All I can say is that drugs are a big no-no and it seems he has sought refuse in drugs. I found as a teenager that experimenting with drugs that gave y friends a nice high was traumatic for me. Great highs and days of depression crying etc after. Alcohol is of course a well known form of self medication and I used it a lot ! I agree with others that hitting a woman is a terrible thing and I suspect more to do with his drug addiction than his mental disorder. being manic is more about saying and doing inappropriate things from laughing too loudly to having grandiose ideas. Depression is more about withdrawing and being self consumed in your dark thoughts. Get off the drugs Matthew.

    • Bozo says:

      07:41am | 22/11/11

      Again the stigma of mental illness - Bi polar is a mental illness. You can not just rationalise your way out of it just like a person with a broken leg can’t rationlise their way into walking. Would the same comments / criticisms appear if an athlete didn’t apologise for not winning a gold in the olympics after breaking their leg?

    • Cheers says:

      07:41am | 22/11/11

      I only caught a few minutes of the interview but what caught me was that he couldn’t sit still on the couch. Just a few minutes gave me pause and realise that this guy really is mentally ill. I abhor his prior behaviour but commend him for seeking the proper treatment he needs to try to live a normal life. For those who say he is hiding behind mental illness to defend his actions, I ask you to think how bad you would have to be to spend 9 + months in full-time treatment. Please also understand that people with mental illness are like alcoholics or drug addicts in some respects - it can take some time to acknowledge that you have a problem and the first step is admitting it. Not one of us can possibly imagine being in Matthew’s head, so it isn’t for us to judge.

      I think Matthew Newton should be judged on his future actions so that he has a chance to prove that he can be a decent human being now that he is being treated correctly.  Time will tell if his past behaviour is a result of his illness not being treated or if he’s just a scumbag.

    • snuff says:

      07:49am | 22/11/11

      go Emma, so true. Mental illness has its place but Matthew was able to make plenty of choices in his life and he could have made the choice to get help before he did the damage to Rachel and Brooke, the first time he threw himself against a wall. He chooses to deny it and avoid the emotions of what he caused.. What a farse of an interview.. instead of talking about your bloody illnesses.. say sorry

    • Someone says:

      07:49am | 22/11/11

      I always used to say ‘what a poor little rich boy’. But you know what - after watching this I understood him. And after reading some of these totally uneducated, emotionally fuelled, total lack of empathy comments I only support him more.

      I wish some of you would actually listen to the interview with an open mind and read up on mental illness’ before bringing out your big ol’ judging stick.

      I have been hospitalised twice battling my own demons. I always thought ‘What’s Matt got to be worried about? He’s got money… a good family…’

      But you know what I was the same. Nothing was really ‘wrong’... I just wasn’t well.

      So after watching this I realised - he’s a person just like any of us. He screwed up. He’s fixing himself. What more do you want?

      Why does he need to ‘take on’ a thousand men to prove he’s sick? How much does he have to hurt himself to prove he’s sick? How many people does he have to hurt to prove he’s sick?

      He isn’t going to take a bunch of pills he doesn’t need.

      If I had ‘been in the spotlight’ at the time I was at my lowest… you would have all thought I was mad as well.

      But you know what - I’m not. I turned myself around. I apologised to people. It took me 2 years to get better but i did…

      Just give this dude the same damn chance and give him a break.

      I will now.

    • Bloke says:

      08:16am | 22/11/11

      I disagree completely. 
      I have suffered severe mental illness also but never hid behind that as an excuse for my actions.

      Nor did I beat up women…repeatedly.
      Nor did I go on tv to sell my side of the story.
      The ONLY reason for him to go on ACA was to salvage some PR. There’s just no other reason to do it.

      I agree that many of the comments above are spiteful and uninformed but the ego on this bloke is extraordinary.  He blamed the illness.  That’s a cop out.

    • Emma says:

      09:33am | 22/11/11

      “Why does he need to ‘take on’ a thousand men to prove he’s sick? “

      He doesn’t.  It implies fairly heavily though that he can control his actions when it suits him.  Like when it might have negative ramifications for him.  So this theory of Matthew not being able to help himself kind of flies out the window.

      “I wish some of you would actually listen to the interview with an open mind and read up on mental illness’ before bringing out your big ol’ judging stick.”

      Perhaps you should read up on “mental illness”.  It’s not one disease, it a collection of diseases.  Most people with bipolar disorder, depression and OCD don’t physically harm others, in fact they’re probably more likely to harm themselves. 

      As far as the ‘judging stick’ goes – well I hate to tell you this but people are judged in society, particularly when they cross the line of physically hurting somebody who can’t fight back ... twice.  He needs to be judged and he needs to know that what he did was unacceptable in society otherwise you, and people like you, are enabling his behaviour and he will never change.

      It’s disturbing to hear so many people talking about empathy for Matthew when they themselves don’t appear to have any for his victims.

    • Jay says:

      11:06am | 22/11/11

      ‘It’s disturbing to hear so many people talking about empathy for Matthew when they themselves don’t appear to have any for his victims”.

      So true. Victims always seem to be an afterthought in cases of domestic violence and murder. All the focus is on the perpetrators and the terrible struggles they went throught that drove them to violence. Meanwhile victims are left to pick up the pieces of their lives or quietly forgotten.

    • Not Happy Tracy says:

      08:03am | 22/11/11

      Really disappointed in the way Tracy handled this interview and her shameless promotion of the story before it aired. To say that it was the most difficult interview she has ever done, and to show fear in her eyes when interviewing Matthew, shows just what little respect she has for those with a mental illness. And the questions…don’t get me started. To expect him to apologise or seek redemption from the general public is ridiculous. He obviously chose to appear on ACA to share his story, but Tracy demeaned him and mental illness in general. I used to respect Tracy as a reporter, but not so much anymore. I thought in this day and age we were all about promoting acceptance of mental illness, not holding up a person with such afflictions to be poked and prodded.

    • life long sufferer says:

      08:10am | 22/11/11

      Wow….so many experts who know absolutely nothing.

    • taz says:

      08:11am | 22/11/11

      Asking someone to apologise for being sick ? very poor form.
      I doubt this author would have the guts to put themselves in the forefront like this on television and talk about such an illness.
      He is recognising he has a problem and has been working towards getting better or at least accepting this illness.
      What more do you want blood sacrifice get over yourself and report about something you actually know about or have empathy towards.

    • not fooled says:

      08:11am | 22/11/11

      Since when is being an entitled, spoiled prat a mental illness?  And what mental illness is sporadic and only makes you occassionally hit women?  The guy is an out and out wanker and I don’t believe for one second he has a mental illness..  Blaming mental illness only makes it worse and does people that actually have a mental illness no favours.

    • Sufferers of Mental Illness Deserve More From Jour says:

      08:13am | 22/11/11

      The whole point of the interview was to bring his mental health issues to the table, not to apologise to the public. He doesn’t owe us an apology and regardless - he did indicate he was sorry for his actions.  You have demonstrated gross journalistic negligence by drumming up hatefulness towards a man who has clearly been affected by mental illness, which many Australian’s are. This article contributes to Australia’s general lack of awareness and understanding of mental illness.  This contributes to the stigma.  Poor form.

    • Sarah says:

      08:14am | 22/11/11

      I can’t believe the amount of people on here bleating about ‘poor Matt’ and that some comments are ‘disrespectful’ towards mental illness.

      Hardly.

      From everything I’ve read so far this morning in the comments section, it seems that there are plenty of bleeding hearts who have been brainwashed by the Newton Family PR machine and Channel 9.

      Matt Newton has disease, he has a mental illness and any mental illness is difficult to diagnose, difficult to manage and difficult to control. That’s a given - and unless you have had personal experience or know someone well who has personal experience with manic depression - its a hard illness to understand - as its not much like clinical depression - which most of us have an understanding and idea of.

      I didn’t see any comments ragging out on mental illness or sufferers of manic depression.

      I saw comments serving Matt Newton up for being a spoilt little feral who has had a lifetime of throwing his weight around in order to get his own way. 

      I saw comments serving Matt Newton up for being a pathetic excuse for a human being - because he has repeatedly abused his partner’s physically and emotionally.

      Its an insult to 99% of the other sufferers of manic depression in the world to write this idiot’s actions off as a result of ‘manic depression’. Having manic depression does not automatically make you want to beat up your partner, or treat them like dirt.

      Having manic depression does not automatically want to make you take drugs and abuse alcohol.

      Matt Newton beat up his partner’s and abused them. Matt Newton used drugs and abused alcohol. Not manic depression.

      As far as I am concerned, he has a mental illness that he will probably spend the rest of his life struggling to control and manage and for that, I feel sad for him. - No-one wants to spend their life on the roller-coaster that is manic depression.

      But I don’t pity him, envy him, or support him for any of his actions. His family have covered for him, protected him and let him get away with this for years. He’s a bad person - and he is insultingly, using a mental illness as his excuse and reason and justification for all the terrible things he has said and done.

      And I also agree with the previous comment from Misha - I think its interesting if nothing else, that after several highly damaging PR incidences, Matt Newton all of a sudden is reported to have a mental illness, this is the reason why he acted the way he did and he is getting help - therefore once he is better - he deserves our support.

      You know what - I don’t see any real support for the partner’s that he abused and God only knows how many more men and women are out there that have had the misfortune to know this fool and have suffered from his actions.

    • bloke says:

      08:14am | 22/11/11

      didn’t people keep these sorts of things private once?? why air it out in public???

    • not fooled says:

      08:49am | 22/11/11

      Future preparation, pity and a bit of narcissism, the belief that these days an appearance on ACA will absolve you of all wrong doing and line up that next big role from any TV producers watching….

    • openminded says:

      08:15am | 22/11/11

      Depression and manic depression, as I, along with most people who have a true understanding of it know, affects each sufferer differently.  And like it or not, the very sad, but scary fact is that in such states, often those that are afflicted actually have no or little control or rational comprehension what they are doing. And lets get some facts straight, neither men or women go to jail for these assaults, its usually after multiple repeats of such assaults that jail time is handed out. Instead, they are sent to rehab or psychiatric clinics to “fix them”. I think this is more the point of the interview, this man knows that what he has done in his manic states is wrong, and he is not trying to make his actions acceptable, pass the buck or make excuses, he is merely trying to make an even greater awareness of these illnesses, and what they do to the sufferer…..lets remember, he is still a human being and has lived through many years of “misdiagnosed” and untreated hell himself, I say well done Mr Newton, and good luck!!! (I post these views as a sufferer of depression as well as having been on the receiving end of such assaults, experience and education can help to open your minds and hearts)

    • Kay says:

      09:14am | 22/11/11

      So how to explain why he only hit women and not men in these irrational, ‘out of control’ moments? It looks to me like he was very *in control*, and was exercising that control over women simply because he could.

    • Ryan Melrose says:

      08:17am | 22/11/11

      Nothing about that interview seemed genuine, as he played monster with his nephew I imagined that was how he acted toward both Brooke and Rachel. He didn’t really even apologise about his actions nor did he acknowledge a substance abuse issue, all a cover up. Sad when a celebrity blames a disease for all his personal mistakes.

    • Tim says:

      08:19am | 22/11/11

      He really only needs to say sorry to those he’s hurt, not the general public. Its really none of our business so I’m sceptically assuming he’s done this because of his career and not for much more which consequently makes his actions less credibly linked to his illness. People like him and Ben Cousins should learn just to shut up and work it out behind closed doors with a semblance of dignity and spare the nosy public of a chance to shoot them down and first opportunity.

    • Bob says:

      08:20am | 22/11/11

      Who is Matthew Newton? Why should I care? And just for the record, why did you “needed” to hear anything at all?

      I appreciate you are an “entertainment” reporter, god knows what that is, yet really, you had nothing better to do with your time than sit down and watch something like a ACA? It must have been a very very very very very slow night in ‘tinsel town’ to have wasted 30 mins of your life watching this show.

    • Schmavo says:

      08:22am | 22/11/11

      so poor little Matty Newton does a soppy interview with the family affiliate at channel 9. I’d like to see a real journalist do the interview with no ties to the family.

    • Rose says:

      08:26am | 22/11/11

      Lets all feel sorry for little Matt, what about the victims who maybe feared for their lives. The guy has had all the opportunities in life and is able to go to rehab when he feels like it. Most people have to wait to gain assistance with their disorders and if you assault people you are usually charged regardless if you any mental illness. Yes I have a mental illness and a brother who is schizophrenic who is currently serving time for assault and not recieving counselling in jail. One set of rules for celebs and one set for everyone else.

    • Oscar says:

      08:27am | 22/11/11

      The wool pulling over the eyes continues: 12 months in a psych ward and were still making excuses.
      Bert n Patty didn’t see the signs: Over indulged childhood. Absent and/or ineffective father figure.
      Just add money and/or alcohol and/or party drugs and the result is what you see before you. Usually it ends in jail or with an overdose, someone killed in a brawl or their car wrapped around a tree/power pole.
      It wasn’t me your honour it was the disease! Clearly they need to find a psychiatrist who will tell them what they need to hear not what they want to hear. Stop making excuses!
      You have violent, spoilt little brat who hasn’t grown up disease and it could end badly for someone in the future.

    • Thai says:

      08:28am | 22/11/11

      Why is it that we feel the need to roll out celebrities for public apologies whenever they behave badly? Surely it’s not us they need to apologise to, but the people they have hurt with their actions.

    • Mr A Dad says:

      08:39am | 22/11/11

      Spot on Daniela, no remorse for the pain and suffering that he caused those TWO girls and the failure to take personal responsibility for his own behaviour, is something that I feel is becoming too prevalent in society today.

      I hit the girls because I had depression, so I don’t need to be sorry because I was unwell. What I feel is that that type of statement is so insulting to every other person who is suffering from exactly the same condition but has the personal fortitude and strength not to assault other human beings.

      It seemed more like an interview for him to try and get his career back on track rather than a true heartfelt apology!

    • Ron E Coote says:

      08:44am | 22/11/11

      One of the more obvious traits in a psychopath, is an inability to empathise and the absence of personal responsibility. Contrition is not something that they can genuinely feel.
      I’ve known a couple of people with the condition, and while they might seem outwardly “normal”, it’s pretty freaky to watch them in action as the character flaws come to the surface. They have no idea that they’ve done, or are doing, something most people would consider wrong.

    • Chi says:

      08:52am | 22/11/11

      I wonder why so many cannot see that by saying his biggest mistake was not getting treatment earlier, is saying that taking preventative measures that would have prevented two women, and other individuals also by his words, from the pain and terror they felt.

      I’ve been in the position those women have been before, and also would have far preferred that the men in question got help for their issues before belting me, rather then even the most heartfelt apology afterwards - on TV or otherwise.

    • Jase says:

      09:24am | 22/11/11

      Chi, he was also high on ICE alot. Who really believes anything he says.

    • Chi says:

      10:05am | 22/11/11

      Jase,

      A great deal of people are sitting in judgement here, and I dont’ think that any of us have the right to be. My point was his statement that it would have been far better to have prevented it.

      Saying someone is on ICE a lot? So far I’ve seen no one give proof of that - it’s hearsay, so therefore I cannot take it into account. What I can take into account is a forced committal to a mental rehabilitation facility, and a stay there of many months. I also must take take not of an admission of a serious mental illness, not one of ICE.

      I do have to say again though - having been in that position, I would far prefer that the men who hit me had received preventative treatment first - rather than terrorising me. It saddens me that mental illness is treated with such disdain in our country, and we can see the direct effects of lack of treatment in this story.

      Rather than denigrate this man, why can we not take from this part of the story that we need to improve treatment of individual’s with mental illness, and prevent many of the crimes against innocents that are committed as a result.

    • Mel says:

      03:54pm | 22/11/11

      “Rather than denigrate this man, why can we not take from this part of the story that we need to improve treatment of individual’s with mental illness, and prevent many of the crimes against innocents that are committed as a result.”

      Probably because domestic violence and assault are not neccesarily caused by mental illness. I’ve been in the same position as well. The man who assaulted me had a mental illness. He also had very warped and backwards attitudes about women and ‘masculinity’ and enjoyed dominating and exerting power over women with physical violence. To prevent violence we need to address these attitudes and this abuse of power, not just mental illness.

    • Steve says:

      08:59am | 22/11/11

      Tough guy… strange how his “mental illness” doesn’t make him bash guys…

    • Kay says:

      09:06am | 22/11/11

      Exactly what I was thinking. If he was so out of control, why did he only direct his rage towards women and not the men around him?

    • Chaps says:

      09:23am | 22/11/11

      Hahah true that Steve. He only hits woman, must be part of his ‘illness’ eh?

      Everyone seems to have forgotten he was a major drug addict, ice ice baby.

    • psychotherapist says:

      09:16am | 22/11/11

      It sounds as though Matthew Newton has borderline personality disorder.  Violence is not part of a mental illness diagnosis.  He fits five of the nine criteria for BPD.

    • Graham says:

      09:26am | 22/11/11

      Bipolar Disorder and OCD, huh? Maybe. Did the psychiatrist mention Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Matt, cause that explains your behaviour too? It also accounts for your lack of empathy towards your victims, lack of insight, lack of accepting responsibility, lack of remorse, sense of entitlement, inflated sense of self-importance and arrogance.

    • ted thorne says:

      09:33am | 22/11/11

      Wonder what Rachael did to Matthew to make him react like that. Wonder when Rachael will apologise for her actions too. No man should have to put up with that sort of treatment.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      09:39am | 22/11/11

      Who, what, how when? I only get the ABC and SBS where I live. Can someone enlighten me or is that irrelevant?

    • Shama says:

      09:43am | 22/11/11

      I have an aunt with mental illness and she has episodes of violence.  While violence is inexcusable it is also hard to “blame” someone who is not in control of their actions.  My aunt also has other personality issues and no “sorry” has come from her towards abused family members, it is not expected too. 

      The TV interview is not about mental illness though.  Whether it is in the public eye or otherwise lives have to go on.  For e.g. we had to work very hard to ensure that my aunt has the right kind of job given all her problems.  This helped her illness to some degree. In Newton’s case he is in a career mediated by the media, there is little else he can do but appear in an interview to show he is back on track.

      The point is he may have a mental illness and it appears he is a first class tool and a spoilt brat.  These parts have to be treated/dealt with by the law or family as appropriate. But his career per se will be based on how he is as an actor.  And based on what I read and see it appears he is not a good person but is a decent actor.

      And unfortunately being an actor these days requires you to be on the talk shows, look appropriately contrite, say sorry etc. And get the audience to feel sympathetic about a person they don’t know.  And have articles on The Punch where we all can opine on how people we don’t know should behave.

    • SZF says:

      10:33am | 22/11/11

      Seems strange to me that most commenters are hung up on the fact he hasn’t said sorry enough times, or he is deserving of sympathy because he is mentally ill. So what!? Sick or not, sorry or not, the dickhead is a repeat domestic abuser.

      Newton’s sole motivation for crawling out from under his rock is to rehabilitate his public image and resurrect his career. It’s no coincidence that he’s been out of the spotlight for a while now - PR 101 is to lay low until the storm blows over, then do a puff piece mea culpa 6-12 months later. No doubt we’ll see a few more appearances (2Day and Nova spring to mind) and sorry’s from this arse in the weeks to come.

    • Tony says:

      10:46am | 22/11/11

      And he kicks off by evoking Lord Byron by saying he’s “mad, bad and dangerous to know”. Helping himself to the praise that lavished on Byron by an adoring female. So this is how Newton sees himself. As some dark and romantic character?

      There’s nothing romantic about domestic violence. There’s nothing glamourous or mysterious about punching your girlfriend. Man up and take responsibility instead of pulling sad puppy dog eyes at the camera.

    • Jem says:

      10:49am | 22/11/11

      There’s mental illness and then there’s domestic violence. These are separate issues. Please note, as others have, that Newton’s mental illness seems to have driven him to hit women only. There’s a reason for that and it has nothing to do with his mental illness. Mathew Newton managed to control himself pretty well around other men and not all people with mental illness assault women.

      We need to stop making excuses for perpetrators of domestic violence. I do hope he gets help for his mental illness, however he also needs to remedy his habit of exerting power and control over women through violence. This is not on, mental illness or not.

    • Hank says:

      11:41am | 22/11/11

      Well said Jem.

    • sheryll green says:

      12:02pm | 22/11/11

      Regardless of the wrongs commited by Matthew Newton,it by no means gave Tracy Grimshaw the right to exploit him.
      I felt that the extended report was for the benefit of ratings only and that it did little to offer the viewer an understanding of mental illness and domestic violence.
      I dont know why,but Grimshaw made me cringe..Yes Matthew Newton needs to be held accountable,but so do the media for making a circus out of this issue.

    • marley says:

      07:12pm | 22/11/11

      Well, okay, but Matt chose to go on the program - he wasn’t ambushed on his way to work by a hidden camera.  He is as much a part of that interview as Grimshaw, and if there’s a circus going on, he’s a willing part of it.

    • CJ says:

      12:09pm | 22/11/11

      Dear editor,
      Here are just a few examples of the material you have chosen to publish today about a person with a mental illness:
      “A complete creep”
      “Twit”
      “Complete dropkick”
      “Mental basket-case”
      “Spoit brat”
      “I don’t think young Matty is right in the head”
      “A weak, pathetic excuse for a human being”
      “A low-life scumbag”
      “A narcissistic piece of work”
      “A goose”
      “A butthead”
      ... and so on.
      Being a senior journalist, I take it you’re familiar with SANE Australia’s guidelines for reporting on mental illness? The guidelines state: “Most people working in the media are conscious about using appropriate language. While improvements have been made, some negative terms such as ‘mental patient’, ‘nutter’, ‘lunatic’, ‘psycho’, ‘schizo’ and ‘mental institution’ are still in use. This language stigmatises mental illness and perpetuates discrimination.”
      It seems you also forgot, didn’t know about or ignored SANE’s advice to: 
      “Include phone numbers and contact details for support services, including helpline numbers. This provides immediate support for those who may have been distressed by your story or prompted to seek help.”
      Furthermore, you also appear to have ignored News Ltd’s Professional Conduct Policy. Section 8.1 of the code states:  “Do not make pejorative reference to a person’s race, nationality, colour, religion, marital status, sex, sexual preferences, age, or physical or mental capacity.”
      And section 11.2 of your Professional Code states: “Where possible, include in such articles the contact number of support groups where people with problems may seek help.”
      So what happened? Why are you publishing such dangerous and unhelpful material? Is there an agenda, or is it just an epic failure, worthy of an over-excited first year cadet? How are you not incompetent at best, reckless at worst?
      How about a “sorry” from The Punch, eh?

    • not fooled says:

      01:02pm | 22/11/11

      CJ, not once did the ‘editor’ call Newton any one of those names.  Those would be the personal views of the commenters that choose to submit a post.  This is an opinion site.  Those are opinions.  The story itself is not about mental illness, it’s about Newton’s failure to say sorry until prompted and the fact that his appearance on ACA was pathetic and did himself no favours..

      This is not an ‘epic failure’, merely an opinion site you CHOSE to read.  If you don’t like it, print it out and dry your tears with it..  I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for that sorry either..

    • CJ says:

      01:44pm | 22/11/11

      Wrong dopey. The editor chose to publish those comments. He / she should not have if he / she were adhered to SANE and News Ltd reporting guidelines for mental illness. It is the editor’s responsibility - not the responsibility of the highly strung git who wants to thrash about on his keyboardand tip shit on everything that moves. It would be the same if an editor published a comment from a reader that was in contempt of court or defamatory - the editor and publisher are liable, not the reader. While this is indeed an opinion site, it is not quarantined from the agreed ethical standards of reporting and publishing.

    • TCM says:

      02:27pm | 22/11/11

      So you write a War & Peace blog post about how terrible it is that The Punch is publishing personal attacks and the first thing you do when “not fooled” questions you is call him “dopey”. Perhaps you should apologise to “Not fooled” first and then ask The Punch to delete your own post before you choke to death on your own hypocrisy.

    • CJ says:

      03:02pm | 22/11/11

      Aaaaand first prize for taking the bait goes to ... TCM!

    • Ron E Coote says:

      04:42pm | 22/11/11

      CJ, are you one of those highly strung gits?
      Thought so.
      Fishing, my dear friend has a far greater art to it than your effort, which appears to be something akin to sticking ones leg in the water to catch a crocodile.

    • TCM says:

      05:38pm | 22/11/11

      @Ron E Coote: Don’t worry. Me making him look like a twerp was clearly part of some master plan of his. He sure played me.

    • Tory Shepherd

      Tory Shepherd says:

      07:09pm | 22/11/11

      You’re right about ‘basket case’, and ‘right in the head’. I deleted those. But the rest are aimed at Newton, not at his mental illness.

      As for including the number; well, the story wasn’t really about mental illness, so it wasn’t included - generally we include it with all stories on suicide, self harm, depression, etc. but not on every piece that relates to people who suffer those.

      Having said that, I will have a think about broadening the scope of when we include the numbers.

    • Ron E Coote says:

      07:29pm | 22/11/11

      Tory, Newton himself admitted mental illness, ergo the not right in the head comment… I don’t give a flying ferret about having a comment pulled (not as if I haven’t had plenty published on this subject), but it seems the censor switch is a little faulty.
      How can you separate the “person” from an “illness” that determines the very behaviour of that person, which your correspondent has herself commented on before inviting us to discuss?
      How does that work?

    • Ron E Coote says:

      08:12pm | 22/11/11

      Actually he (Newton) didn’t admit mental illness, he bloody well claimed it on national tv. Thus rendering this hyper-sensitivity all the more pointless.
      That’s it for me on this subject.

    • stephen says:

      09:02pm | 22/11/11

      Well she’s not a doctor, so she’s not at least guilty of negligence.
      And that the author did not include every proviso for her opinions ... well, I don’t think that’s a case for the courts.

    • george says:

      12:12pm | 22/11/11

      Suzie O’Brien says its unacceptable for a man to hit a woman under any circumstances. Whilst i generally agree, what about if the woman is being physically violent towards a man. My Ex Wife assaulted me, I didn’t even defend myself, just took the blow. I was then instructed by by council and the court to take the equivalent to an IVO to give finality to the issue as to fight it would be long and expensive. Will never fall for that again. Next time I’m assaulted by a woman, if that ever happens in my life, i will slap her all the way to the cop shop. At least then I will know I earnt the IVO.

    • GB says:

      12:15pm | 22/11/11

      Can somebody please answer me this. Why is it that we have only ever heard about him acting out these violent episodes against the women in his life? Where is the story about the random guy he punched in the face at the local Pub as a result of his “illness”? Or by some mysterious freak of nature, do these episodes only occur when he is around women? What also hasn’t been discussed is the cause of this mental illness. It’s no secret he has enjoyed his fame and all the “benefits” that go with it. Last night’s ACA interview did absolutely nothing to change my opinion of him. I think he is a little grub, hiding behind the difficult to disprove cloak of mental illness as a means to cover his own arse, all the while buying himself some sort of sympathy from the wider public with his bullshit Mea Culpa act. Sorry Newton, not from me.

    • Joan Bennett says:

      12:20pm | 22/11/11

      I guess the proof is in the pudding.  If he hits another woman, after he’s receiving treatment (and admitted he is doing much better) he can’t say it’s the illness that’s making him do it.  Let’s wait and see.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      12:29pm | 22/11/11

      The first time I laid eyes on Matthew Newton I decided he was a First Class Ar*ehole. He was appearing on a Christmas or New year outdoor concert as a singer and brought a couple of other make singers on to sing with him. Boy, does that guy love himself. His ego must have its own gravitational field.

      Whether or not his subsequent actions were caused by mental health issues, I can’t say, but I suspect that, even underneath his depression and bipolar problems, there lurks an unattractive personality and an unhealthy disdain for women. Nothing in the ACA interview changed my mind. He clearly accepts no responsibility for his actions and sought to control the interview. His body language was all wrong and I felt that more violence lies just beneath the surface. He was acting a part last night, but small glimpses of his true nature leaked out nevertheless, and I reckon he struggled to contain his anger at being questioned so frankly by a woman.

      He could change, but I doubt that will happen until he learns some empathy and some respect for women - and accepts that the world does not revolve around him.

    • Andrew says:

      01:12pm | 22/11/11

      Its funny how this mental illness of his only makes him strike out at woman, I didnt realise mental illness could make you so selective, if he cant help striking out how come he can choose who he strikes out at, when he walks into a pub or down the street and strikes out at someone that isnt actually weaker then him I might start believing he has a illness that he cant control.

    • The Free says:

      02:35pm | 22/11/11

      He did hit a guy, it’s just that we never hear about it, because hitting men is not the same in most people’s eyes as hitting women

    • Bony Toby says:

      03:43pm | 22/11/11

      @ The Free: Correction, he CLAIMED he hit guys. A champion boxer too no less! He was craaaaazy. Strange that none of these guys ever went public with the story that they were attacked by Matthew Newtion. Pretty sure Today Tonight would be paying 5 figures for that story. smile

    • Madam Bipolar says:

      02:34pm | 22/11/11

      I have bipolar disorder and I don’t go around bashing people up. This makes me sad because I believe people will now think people with bipolar have a propensity towards violence. This is mostly untrue.
      The thing that got me about the interview was that Newton spent most of the time talking about himself and not acknowledging the pain he had caused.
      I am also putting money on the fact the interview was paid. That is sad and immoral of Nine.

    • Lou says:

      03:04pm | 22/11/11

      Too many people are associating this privileged actor’s pattern of violence towards women with mental illness (thereby tarring mentally ill people with the violent brush).

      Not nearly enough comments about his reported hard drug addiction. 

      No good PR in owning up to the drug problem.

    • CynicalGoatWA says:

      03:10pm | 22/11/11

      Matt Newton is a gutless wanker plain and simple. It was a fantasy to think that he was ever going to apologise. And Tracy Grimshaw and Channel Nine should be ashamed of themselves for giving him any oxygen.

    • Paradoxy says:

      03:14pm | 22/11/11

      So I’m just going to throw this one out there, but has anyone considered Matt Newton is a product of violence and abuse? We all sit here and paint the Newtons as a wholesome and down-to-earth family, but we don’t know what happens behind closed doors. Matt’s violent tendencies have to come from somewhere.

    • Ron E Coote says:

      05:01pm | 22/11/11

      Oh yeah, it must be Bert and Patty’s fault. Blame the folks.
      My old man used to smack my mum around a bit, and he used to give the kids a bit of a touch-up for good measure. Actually they were both pretty handy with the strap/power chord/coat hanger/wooden spoon/insert handy item here.
      I have never hit a woman, and never will. I have very rarely smacked my kids, as a behaviour modification of last resort, and abhor bullying of any kind. Never had a real fist fight.
      People have to own their actions, and not blame shithouse behaviour on any number of fashionable excuses. If he were any ordinary pleb he would in all liklehood have copped a lot more from the judge than he did.
      He needs to count his lucky stars, take a long walk through the room of mirrors, and do whatever it takes to figure out how to start acting like a man, and not the spoilt celebrity dickhead he so shamelessly appears to be.

    • Paradoxy says:

      08:01am | 23/11/11

      Wow Ron E Coote, didn’t realise you were so close to the family. Just because you broke the circle of violence doesn’t mean everybody can (or does). Some will blame mental illness, others will blame drug abuse, but I suspect he is a product of his environment. Just because his parents are nice on TV, doesn’t mean they are nice in real life. Just take Matt and his public persona before he got into trouble.

    • Honest Mum says:

      05:15pm | 22/11/11

      If every ordinary, non “famous” (and I use that term loosely) person could get away not once, but twice with domestic violence, our prisons would be empty, and our mental health facilities full. As for the Magistrate who let Newton off the first time, calling Newton a “gentleman”, I hope to God my sons don’t end up being that type of “gentleman”. I hope my sons grow up to be REAL MEN that don’t hit women.

    • Skeptical says:

      09:13pm | 22/11/11

      I have great sympathy for mental illlness; and a deep understanding of it being an on-going student of neuroscience and a writer on this topic. What I find hugely disturbing is that if you go beserk and hit yourself and others in a frenzy then most people would come to the immediate conclusion there was something seriously wrong and see a doctor, So much is known about mental illness nowadays even a general practitioner would see the signs of bipolar a mile off. Yet we are supposed to believe Matt had only recently been properly diagnosed? ... I sense there is more to this story than meets the eye. And if he was diagnosed earlier than he claims, and failed to medicate or stay on his meds, then he has no excuse for the physical violence against others and against himself that continued on for so long.
      I applaud his honesty but I suspect he missed a few crucial bits of information; and Grimshaw hasn’t had the experience with mental illness to ask the hard question.

    • Mik says:

      09:20pm | 23/11/11

      Sadly research has shown bipolar disorder is often not diagnosed until about ten years or more after onset. Much damage can done by and to the sufferer in the intervening time.
      It is not something that may be as easily diagnosed as suggested.

    • Bipolar Registered Mental Health Nurse. says:

      10:24pm | 22/11/11

      Disappointing ACA. This did nothing for destigmatising mental illness. Highlighting violence as a feature of mental illness and a manic episode angers me as a sufferer of Bipolar Affective Disorder. I did not assault anyone when manic and as a mental health nurse I am well aware the majority of mentally ill people do not ever assault anyone. Yes mania is confusing and sometimes terrifying and mental illness requires long term commitment to treat effectively. Mental illness also requires effective early intervention and acceptance of the illness and need for treatment by the individual suffering.  Manic Depression is old fashioned terminology which is not used in modern mental health. Did A Current Affair consult with any mental health advisory bodies for this piece? If the aim was simply catharsis for Matthew maybe the goal was achieved. It is sad that effective treatment is delayed for a variety of reasons and I hope Matthew’s progress continues.

    • Honest Mum says:

      11:27pm | 22/11/11

      If a man treated Matthew Newton’s sister Lauren the way he treated Brooke and Rachel, this would be a very different story. Would the Newton PR machine be so quick to protect then? Nope, there would be no “it’s terrible, but Lauren must understand it’s a mental illness, and that’s why she was beaten”. All that this family seems to care about is image and career.Matthew is an actor - don’t take it for granted he hasn’t Googled mental illness to escape conviction . ACA was an interview alright - a job interview.

    • SpagBol says:

      07:54am | 23/11/11

      If violence is such a hard-to-control part of his “serious mental illness”, how come he isn’t violent with men? Does manic depression make you a sexist twat, too, then?

    • NightStalker says:

      11:06am | 23/11/11

      Been there done that so I have an idea how it all works, what would go a way to solving Matthew Newton’s problem would be a good smack on his bottom!

    • V says:

      01:50pm | 23/11/11

      A person with a mental illness needs care and love around them. His parents are also victims of his illness. They love him unconditionally, and what a lovely couple they are. Take him away from media exposure and let those experienced in the field of mental illness deal with it.  It is not a death sentence, however perpetuating the situation is not helping.  He did a wrong thing. He has owned up to it.  Now it is time for the healing process to begin. One thing nobody can ever claim, and that is the thoughts of what is going through another persons head. Nobody can ever know someone but perhaps give a little.  Encourage and this may help his illness and is sense of worth as well.
      Perhaps underbelly didn’t do any good for his mind.  I wish the Newton family Peace and happiness at Christmas and great things in 2012.

    • girlpedro says:

      02:45pm | 23/11/11

      I’m sorry but did I see the same interview as everyone else?  Multiple times Matthew said that he was sorry for what had happened and that he utterly regretted his actions!!  He also stated that his violence was directed at family , partners and close friends which would include men so he’s not selectively targeting women!!  It’s ignorance regarding mental health issues that has all the rightous folk out there up in arms and focussed on the ‘violence against women’ issue.  Being female and have being mis-diagnosed for the same condition for over 20 years, I know how hard it is to keep yourself in some semblance of ‘normal’ when even your doctors can’t help you!  I self-destructed many times without having a clue what the hell was happening.  The mental health industry is seriously under-resourced and it wasn’t until I was ‘sectioned’ or involuntarily committed, anyone bothered to think about possible other diagnoses.  I hope Matthew’s struggle is a little less and that people are more forgiving in the future.

    • Kerenina says:

      09:12am | 24/11/11

      To blame this little man’s behaviour on mental illness is demeaning to people who do actually suffer from mental illness.  Being bullying and abusive to women (or anyone) is just not acceptable, and even more so for people in the public eye who are at risk of becoming very unhealthy role models to impressionable young people.  Kyle Sandilands and Matthew are in the same boat!

    • Elise says:

      10:33am | 24/11/11

      I totally agree with this article. I understand that mental illness may have played a role in his repeated assaults, but I balk at the suggestion that this means he is not to blame or should not apologise.
      An explanation is not an excuse. When you do something wrong (several times, no less, and in a pattern), you apologise unreservedly and without qualification. I don’t believe that mental illness, short of the most serious kinds, should EVER mean that a person cannot take responsibility for his actions.
      As far as I’m concerned, there is very little he can do now to save my and many others’ opinions of him. He had his chance (twice in two separate controversies) to admit his wrongdoing and admit his fault, but chooses instead to constantly cower behind the banner of mental illness.
      Matthew Newton, if you were murdered by someone with anger issues, do those issues excuse that person? Is the defence “Yeah, but it’s ok, because I made him mad and he’s been having some personal issues”. Grow up, dude

    • Heidi Mungoven (Loving wife of Bipolar sufferer) says:

      08:41am | 28/11/11

      If the media’s intention was to hold a loaded gun to Matthew’s head with the hope of getting an apology, then it was the media’s gun that misfired. Mental Illness already carries heavy stigma. Shame on you media. You should be raising awareness of this very dark disease known as the Black Dog. This story showed a lack of understanding and empathy for the sufferers, their spouses, families and friends, all of whom suffer pain and anguish at the hands of this insidious disease. Educate yourselves, to at least hide your ignorance.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter