This week there is an amazing discussion going on in Tokyo between Chinese and Japanese companies, academics and Government representatives about how to cooperate in the area of new energy. It is part of the ‘PVJapan Solar Power/Photovoltaic 2009’ conference and trade show.

Both countries are realizing that the new kind of economy we need to cut greenhouse gases, is itself going to become an opportunity for jobs and development. 

Japan’s PM Mr. Taro Aso raised the stakes back on June 9 when he said that solar power and electric cars are the foundation of Japan’s future economic growth and the way out of the financial crisis. He announced that by 2020 Japan’s new low-carbon sector will be a 50 trillion yen market ($AU650 billion), employing 1.4 million people.

As he concludes:

“To work up a sweat. To produce great results as a team with organizational power. These traditions have contributed to the “manufacturing” sector of Japan. If these strengths can be utilized, the Japanese economy still has great potential.”

You can read the whole speech here.

It should come as no surprise that Asia’s two biggest economies – China and Japan – are cooperating to create a clean energy revolution in the face of climate change and Peak Oil.

While Australia’s coal, gas and aluminum lobby moans about how hard it would be to save vast amounts of energy and generate baseload-grade renewable power, Japan and China are getting on with it.

To get a sense of how quickly photovoltaic (PV) energy will change your life, remember back to when mobile phones reached the tipping point.

For years they were obscure and perhaps even a little pretentious, then suddenly everyone had to have them and have them they did. PV is about there now. Before you know it, it will be everywhere.

Yesterday I explained to some of one of the organizers of ‘PV Japan 2009’ how far behind Australia is and today was told by a German journalist how this story has gone around the conference. He says that people find it incomprehensible how little solar generation Australia has.

He suggests helpfully that Prime Minister Kevin Rudd ‘should be a great step’, compared to the previous PM John Howard and allow us to realize our vast solar potential.

The whole of this event is about photovoltaic cells, the ‘solar panels’ that can can be put on the roof of a house to generate electricity on site. The conference in Tokyo this week is just about this one technology and does not look at any other promising renewable technologies such as wind and wave power. 

PV is interesting because it puts the power plant on the house or business where it is needed, saving energy losses from transmitting electricity over long distances. This gives it a competitive edge over all forms of centralized energy from conventional sources such as coal and nuclear to renewables such as wind farms or concentrated solar thermal power plants.

According to discussions in Japan this week, there is a consensus that Japan can easily quadruple its installed PV by 2030, to 202GW. To put this in perspective, a big coal-fired power station puts out around 1GW. And unlike coal-fired power, the PV power is in many cases on the actual building where the electricity will be consumed.

Japan’s PV industry is driven and coordinated in typically Japanese fashion, by NEDO, the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. My guide from NEDO is Masanori Ishimura. He helps translate Japans inspiring approach to the climate change crisis. 

Japan has confidence that it can invent an energy revolution. The Government has just announced this week that 36,000 schools will be solarised with PV, in order to increase demand and bring on economies of scale that will lower prices.

Last year NEDO spent Y74 billion ($AU967 million) on various energy conservation and renewable research programmes. PV got Y3.7billion ($AU48 million) on R&D of new technologies and Y6.3billion ($AU$82 million) on field testing to bring them out of the laboratory and up to scale for commercial utilization. This research looks at the basic materials and componants, including investigations into organic solar cells. 

Japan used to be the world leader in PV and intends to get back there, according to Hideki Fukuda, Director General of the new energy programme at NEDO. He acknowledges that China has become the worlds largest exporter of pv cells and that the Americans now spend about three times as much as Japan on pv R&D.

In 2007 China was the second biggest investor in renewable energy US at $12billion (just behind Germany at US$14 billion).

The Chinese Government will soon announce a new policy target for clean energy, tipped to be 20 per cent renewable electricity by 2020. This will entail a 75-fold growth in solar in just over ten years.

The biggest energy source in the world is conservation of wasted energy, or ‘Negawatts’. Even conservative World Bank forecasts predict that China could reap 100 GW in energy savings by 2020. This is equivalent to around 100 coal-fired power stations. 

Analysts estimate that around one third of China’s US $590bn economic stimulus package is ‘green’, such as new energy transmission systems and public transport, which both cut emissions

The enthusiasm for solar is of course not limited to Japan and China. Chung-Wen Lan General Director of Taiwan’s Photovoltaics Tehcology Centre says that even with the global recession, ‘We should be very optimistic for the future of photovoltaics’.

If Australia wants to stay competitive in energy, we have to switch our national priorities from coal to solar.

12 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • camaropl says:

      11:38am | 10/01/12

      <a >the diet solution review</a>

    • Chris says:

      02:36pm | 24/07/09

      Without subsidy and political patronage, solar PV will not cut it. Placing mini-power plants on the roof-tops of buildings sacrifices economies of scale - an advantage in big centralised power stations.
      What the German observer failed to admit is that subsidised solar panels are a politically defensible way to buy votes; pork-barrel politics parading as environmental virtue. The gullible buyer who opts in believes he is getting something for nothing, a base motive the canny politician eagerly exploits.
      The author does not make it clear that most solar PV on domestic rooftops (as in Australia) is not stand-alone plant, but requires mains infrastructure as both a sink for surplus output and a vital backup . Battery storage has proved very expensive for domestic users. So I’d question whether there will be a saving in investment in distribution plant, even in the long term.
      200 GW of Japanese solar would need about 2 billion square metres of collector area. In a country where industrial land costs hundreds of dollars a square metre, roof-top collection becomes obligatory. As for subsidies, Japan already has a public debt exceeding its GNP, so I wonder if any Japanese politician’s promises can even be trusted beyond this decade? Can Kevin Rudd’s?
      Remember, a kilowatt of solar is not worth a kilowatt of base load coal, anyway.
      Total global PV inventory recently reached 5GW, enough to replace some 1.2 GW of base load coal capacity .
      Just to replace all nuclear plant in the world, you would need over 1000 times the extant inventory of solar PV, a big cost without a carbon reduction dividend..
      Roof-top solar water heaters are not the main story, but relevant to the overall subject. However, if every dwelling in Australia installed 1 sq Metre of solar water heaters (costing about $12 billion) it would save barely half a percent out of national energy demand. Big deal.
      Unlike the author, I am totally unimpressed with the Rudd-Wong-Garrett triad.
      Without buying into the climate change debate, it is obvious to me that anyone who takes carbon emissions seriously must support nuclear power plants for the next 50 years. The three stooges do not.

    • AllanL says:

      09:34am | 24/07/09

      And how many coal powered power stations and nuclear power stations is China going to commission over the next twelve months Dan?
      China is undergoing such a huge demand for electricity that it would pipe human farts to power stations if it was technically feasible.
      What is constantly underestimated is the future demand for electricity.
      The amount of electricity that will be required to replace petroleum products with the conversion of trucks and cars to electricity and hydrogen fuel is mind boggling.
      And with the National Broadband Network and its associated infrastructure will place further demands on current electricity suppliers.
      As you said Dan, there was a tipping point for mobiles, there will also be one for greater electricity production.

    • Dan Cass says:

      12:47pm | 14/07/09

      Follow up : while Australia is planning on building more coal power, China will build 1.8GW of new solar by Suntech (an ex-Australian!) http://ff.im/-5boIV (via @live_china)

    • Dan Cass says:

      01:22am | 02/07/09

      I appreciate your point of view Phil. There really is no economic argument in favor of delaying climate action - Stern proved that, as if there was any doubt!

      Shaun that’s interesting - how does the price of a solar water system compare to conventional? Is there any subsidy at play?

    • Phil says:

      10:28pm | 01/07/09

      The Japanese commitment is even more shame-making for Australia when you consider the further delay and hand-wringing that is preceding the carbon trading scheme development - justified by Penny Wong on the basis of Australia’s economic down-turn.  What about Japan and its record negative growth figures? Australia’s solar shame.

    • Shaun says:

      10:31pm | 30/06/09

      I have been living in Beijing, China for the past 5 months and have traveled to several other provinces across the country, and its staggering to see the amount of solar panels on the rooftops of houses and apartment blocks. I believe most are solar water heating panels, and given the hot climate (not unlike Australia) they certainly serve their purpose well. In every city there are many stores selling these panels, I believe prices start at about 1,500 yuan ($270AU).  Very impressive for a developing nation, it’s unfortunate that in the West we prefer to preach rather than practise.

    • Dan Cass says:

      09:07pm | 30/06/09

      Thanks for the comments.

      Jim I think you are right about where the ALP is at now, but don’t you think the politics of energy might shift rather quickly now Obama is making the USA move? Yes ANDIKA I think California is a good example, especially for people who might not be as enthusiastic as Philippa as taking a lead from China and Japan!

      watty I think you’re wedded to the past and not sure where you are getting your nuke figures? China will not get to 20% nuke in the foreseeable future for the same reason its a dud everywhere - its waay too expensive.

      If you don’t think Japan can do it, then see this scenario that has Japan reduce emissions by 77% by 2050 *and* phase out all its nukes. http://bit.ly/Hnuhn

    • watty says:

      03:52pm | 30/06/09

      The State of California is an economic basket case in more ways than one.

      Despite billions of U.S. $ being given to solar energy resources in grants,tax breaks and “development” costs solar contributes less than 1% of California’s energy mix.

      The countries mentioned Japan and China have or will have approx 20% nuclear power to help reduce their emissions a factor not given the light of sday by the Australiann Government or even the Australian media.

      I seem to remeber that the German Government calculated they would need more than 60.000 windmills just to replace their existing nuclear generated power.

      They would possibly run out of suitable land before installing an unproven (in this capacity) form og electrical power.

      Dream on “alternatives” your day will be a long time comingf(if ever)

    • ANDIKA says:

      01:59pm | 30/06/09

      Australian State Governments should just copy what the Californian State Government has mandated for every new residential dwelling built from 2012 onwards – that is all homes must have solar panels with return to the grid flexibility, solar hot water and be fully insulated. Include compulsory water tanks and you’d be making a real difference. This would also equate to new jobs as you would need a lot of solar installers etc.
      The only downside to solar of course is when it’s dark there’s no energy, but recent technological advances with regard to Battery GEL storage facilities may just overcome the need to install expensive rechargeable lithium battery banks.
      I personally think GEOTHERMAL and HYDRO are the way to go – just look at NZ.
      Rudd & CO would have been better off to spend tens of billions of taxpayers’ money not on useless handouts but on building a massive hydro dam in central QLD. The last floods alone in central/north QLD was equivalent to 50 SYD harbours in terms of water volume.  Not only would a hydro dam ensure renewable clean energy, but it would also guarantee QLD’s (and may North NSW’) water needs and it would take significant pressure of the River Murray.

    • Philippa says:

      11:27am | 30/06/09

      It would be great if Australian leaders responded to the PV industry with the same guts and enthusiasm. Our government should stop supporting coal and start supporting green energy technology. Does we really want to tie our future to the toxic coal industry when, judging by the ambitions of Japan and China, it will soon become obsolete?

    • Jim says:

      08:33am | 30/06/09

      Sadly, with the limp, net feed-in tariffs offered by our state governments, there is little chance of solar power ever taking off in Australia like it has in China, Japan, Germany or Spain. There is too little incentive for households to invest the thousands needed to generate their own solar energy. Our big coal companies have too much sway and, in NSW at least, I can’t see the government implementing a feed-in tariff scheme that would make its soon-to-be-sold off power retailers less attractive to buyers.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter