When you tune in to a Test Match and see the New Zealand skipper cop a Kookaburra in the testicles in super slow-motion from seven angles, you realise the technology of televised cricket has gone nuts.

Even StickCricket is more advanced than ever. Picture courtesy: StickCricket

In 1977 Daddles the Duck skulked across our screens for the first time, accompanying the brooding batsman on his long walk back to the pavilion. Willow under his wing, tear dripping from his eye, the animated quack was one of the first computer graphics to complement the on-field action, and was part of Kerry Packer’s push to package cricket for TV.

Three decades on, a glut of high-tech gadgetry and a smorgasbord of stats provide the DNA of every delivery. Atari-like graphics have been superseded by a sophisticated suite of digital devices which make NASA look like a bunch of kids farting about with a junior science kit.

Snicko, hawk-eye, super slow-mo, hot-spot… Sometimes I think I’ve tuned in to CSI Miami rather than the cricket. Each summer the micro-scientists at Channel 9 unveil some state-of-the-art simulation or cutting-edge camera which offer an autopsy of the action from every conceivable angle while condemning the baffled human umpires to glorified hatstands.

And you thought Greg Chappell played cricket with big brother.

Latest additions to the forensic wizardry include improvements to ball tracking thanks to 230-frames-per-second cameras; a protractor that rises from the pitch like a surfacing submarine to calculate the bounce angle of the ball to the nth degree; a two-dimensional wagon wheel which frightens my children because it resembles a tarantula; probes placed on players so viewers can see their accelerated heart rate after taking – or fluffing – a catch; a fall of wickets spreadsheet showing date and time of dismissal…

Sometimes you forget cricket is played with a bat, a ball and three sticks.

As you marvel at this incomplete list of high-tech enhancements, thanks to GPS satellite tracking you can also appreciate the fact that Michael Hussey, for example, has covered 3.5km during the course of his day’s play: 0.9km walking, 1.1km jogging, and 1.5km searching the dressing room for his beloved zinc cream.

This is the one stat I resent, as I guiltily realise that in the same time Hussey has covered several kilometres I’ve necked three beers and downed a pizza.

Not only is the technology analytical, it is also interactive. The Vodafone Viewers’ Verdict fluctuates like the graphic equaliser on a ghetto blaster, as we predict how many runs New Zealand will score, how many days the Test Match will last, how many seagulls are snoozing at fine leg, how many times Michael Clarke will scratch his nuts at slip.

The over-analysis of the game on the field is perhaps a reflection of its over-analysis off it. Modern dressing rooms are comprised of a cordon of specialist coaches – bowling, batting, fielding, fitness, nutrition, psychology – each of them with a laptop on their knees, painstakingly breaking cricket down into its constituent parts in the hope of improving future performance of the whole.

The irony of the over-coached era is that the standard of cricket in Australia has deteriorated in recent years, which suggests the science of coaching is no substitute for naturally talented players. Or perhaps it’s because those players are trying to play three forms of the game at once.

Watch this space – next year Channel 9’s Wide World of Slow-Motion Sports will have a graph averaging player performance across the various versions of the game. And, like many of their graphs, it will take me most of the summer to figure it out.

Technology is both augmenting and arbitrating the action. While other sports still debate the role of technology as referee, the heart-in-mouth climax to the recent Second Test between Australia and New Zealand signalled loud and clear that technology ruled cricket.

On two occasions, both of them LBW shouts against Nathan Lyon, the outcome of the match hinged entirely on a decision from the third umpire. Rather than ruin the spectacle, it added to the excitement. Trans-Tasman fingernails were reduced to serrated rubble as the third umpire proved the redundancy of the other two. 

Unlike free-flowing games such as soccer and AFL, technology has found its place in cricket because of the staccato nature of the action and the need to plug its gaps. And it has found its place as umpire because cricket is not a game of inches but of millimetres – that hallowed ‘coat of varnish’ on which games are won and lost, careers kick started and cut short.

Given Australia’s brittle batting line up, the upcoming Indian summer might not be high-scoring but it will be high-tech. The last time the Indian team toured Australia was the best advertisement for technology in cricket to be found.

Indeed it could have saved the race row. A matter of seconds after Andrew Symonds edged that infamous delivery into Dhoni’s gloves (only to be adjudged not out, go on to make a century and thus spark the acrimony) the only person in the stadium, indeed the only person in a worldwide television audience of millions who didn’t realise the decision was incorrect was the poor bloke who’d made it.

Steve Bucknor didn’t know Symonds was out from 22 yards, but I knew from as far away as North London. 

Perhaps sipping a Caribbean cocktail, banished Bucknor will watch the upcoming series between the same sides from an armchair in Antigua. And, thanks to the technology of cricket, he’d be in a better position to umpire the match from that armchair than he was in 2008 while standing at the crease.

However, just as at Lords, the ‘home of cricket’, technology doesn’t provide a level playing field. Ball tracking was less accurate at this year’s World Cup in India, where they used 25-frames-per-second cameras, than it is during the current summer Down Under, where we are using 230-frames-per-second cameras.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are much more likely to secure a conviction in CSI Sydney than in CSI Mumbai.

When used properly, technology is the best medicine for bad umpiring in cricket. No human eye can track that frantic cherry with pinpoint accuracy, even if the umpire has Twenty20 vision.

A side-effect of that medicine is the slow death of the dialect of the game. Today’s viewers no longer need know the names of the fielding positions, for example.

When a television commentator refers to, say, mid-wicket or square-leg, those areas of the oval are duly highlighted or have a circle drawn around them with some magic wand. Radio, on the other hand, or ear rather, calls on the sum of the listeners’ cricket knowledge.

When will this blizzard of technology abate?

When there’s a rain delay nowadays we watch matches from 20 years ago complete with graphics that seem so unsophisticated.

In the acid-rain delays of 2030, what could possibly appear unsophisticated about today’s graphics? Perhaps we’ll be watching in 3D. Perhaps the umpires in the middle will have been replaced by Emirates hostesses. Perhaps the tattoos on players’ arms will be animated.

A few years ago Test Cricket was on death row. Its stay of execution is due to an injection of aggression from players hung-over from Twenty20, as well as Daddles the Duck and the high-tech brood he hatched. The bombardment of slow-motion and statistical analysis ensures there is never a dull moment in the coverage when viewers might, heaven forbid, change channel.

Kerry Packer’s duck was truly golden. And still not out.

Most commented


Show oldest | newest first

    • Mahhrat says:

      06:04am | 21/12/11

      Six sticks.  Get your data right.

      Second, did you ever buy a silly nationally-coloured hat or shirt as a kid?  Maybe a massive finger?  Or make up a sign?

      That’s technology.  It added to the game. 

      The new generation of technology is simply more of the same.  It’s been going on a lot longer than just a few years.  I welcome it; it’s a great thing to ignore while waiting for the next delivery.

      I also love cricket stats because they gave me the leg up into my career.  I started my love of Excel when I was 15, playing cricket in the backyard.  We used to keep stats, and I’d lovingly transcribe them from scraps of paper into Excel sheets, complete with the graphs, percentages and averages.  I got right into my maths and governance skills, which I now earn a decent living off.

    • Nathan says:

      07:52am | 21/12/11

      your exactly right, after reading moneyball i see just how important and useful stats can be if you know what to look for.

    • Paul says:

      02:45pm | 21/12/11

      ten sticks if you are going to be anal.  (four bails, six stumps raspberry)

    • Daemon says:

      07:25am | 21/12/11

      I was listening to the cricket on ABC radio the other day and realised that my companion at the time had no idea what the commentators were talking about. An eye opening moment.

    • Jobe says:

      08:01am | 21/12/11

      Channel 9 have ‘educated’ viewers of all sports they televise. Thankfully pay per view sports have much better commentary and analysis. You do get what you pay for.

    • Stumped says:

      08:09am | 21/12/11

      “In the acid-rain delays of 2030” you must be trying to be funny with this remark but the reality is cricket is a dying game and has been for the last twenty years.

      Kerry Packer could see the slow decline, he was worried about ratings and tried to condense an overly long game into something interesting.

      Technology is the latest attempt at saving a lost cause.

    • TS says:

      08:14am | 21/12/11

      The Indians have declined the use of technology this summer, so no referral system at all during the tests.

      Good I say.

    • Budz says:

      09:25am | 21/12/11

      Terrible I say. They are there to help the umpire get the decision right. I know if I was an umpire I’d much rather have technology at my disposal. The first reason being that my job as an umpire is to give the right decision.
      Secondly we will have the situation in this series where the umpire clearly got it wrong, and will be made to look like a goose because of this, and the decision will stand. Even the umpires would rather use DRS!

    • TS says:

      10:25am | 21/12/11

      Budz, you are right in that it is there for the umpire. As Ch9 are happy to espouse, the technology is supposed to be there to overturn howlers, not contest 50/50s in the hope of ‘getting one’ to go your way.

      If the technology were there /only/ for the umpires to use, great. I don’t care for the players being able to refer decisions. In it’s current format I find it embarrassing to watch, and it takes far too long for decisions to be made.

    • Budz says:

      01:11pm | 21/12/11

      I reckon it adds to the theatre when players have to choose to refer a decision, same as with Hawk Eye in the tennis. It puts the responsibility on the players shoulders to decide.

    • bill09 says:

      08:16am | 21/12/11

      Can we please have jelly wrestling at half time ,as well….Any thing but the Cricket Show..!!!

    • Mahhrat says:

      10:16am | 21/12/11

      There’s plenty of jelly on there already Bill - every time Tubby Taylor gives us a full body shot!

    • Daemon says:

      09:19am | 21/12/11

      Listen on ABC Grandstand and watch on 9. They didn’t put the T20 on free to air last night in Brisbane, the game ticketing was apparently a complete shemozzle, no one had tickets at the gate (all reported on ABC 612 this morning). I think cricket has lost something, but when you want to indulge in some form of sporting, what else is there.

      I agree with the proposal for jelly wrestling. I recommend we get the Pakistanis in to star. That way they won’t have time to fix the matches.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      01:32pm | 21/12/11

      So much cricket takes place, these days, away from the eyes of the unwashed public - on pay TV. Personally, I have lost touch with who is in or out of the team and have no idea at all about the players current form- because I don’t have pay TV.

      Goodbye cricket, it was nice knowing you.

    • Daemon says:

      03:12pm | 21/12/11

      Actually, Blind, just listen to the cricket on Auntie. Makes no difference to you, since you are blind any old how.

    • Robert says:

      06:05pm | 21/12/11

      Who the hell cares about cricket anyway? have a look at the stands, boys 7 girls, when Cricket Australia allows the TV cameras to pan across them! Despite the canned cheering etc. of apparently 1000s all we see are a few lone people - maybe up to a couple of dozen & that is at week-ends. Cricket really is the most over-rated, alleged, sport ever. Those running the show are, it seems, continually coming up with new varieties of it & they always seem to fail! Now I am writing about Australia not India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Africa & the UK where the numbers of spectators at even the lowliest match climb into the 1000s. Maybe this lack of spectators during the week is understandable for some people actually do go to work here. But at week-ends - long & short? where the hell are the spectators? It is not as if there are other Mass Spectator sports going on every single week-end. Cricket during the Summer Months has the field all to itself but still can’t get the crowds.
      Cut off all Federla, Stae & Territory funding & do it now for it achieves nothing!

    • Philip Wilson says:

      06:43pm | 21/12/11

      I think Stumped should head home to the jungles of Rwanda,and join his brethren. Philistine!

    • Paul M says:

      06:45pm | 21/12/11

      So, is it time to abolish the umpire’s job? At least in so far as making calls?

    • Rhino says:

      11:14am | 22/12/11

      Test cricket, in Brisbane at least, has been killed by the complete lack of freedom afforded to patrons of the “gabba”. No longer is the mexican wave tolerated and if you dare play with an inflatable beach ball a big tough officer of the law will swiftly puncture it with his biro as he smiles proudly into the croud.

      The game has boring bits. Let the crowd do something to amuse themselves during these times and the crowds will return!

    • replica oakley sunglasses says:

      06:19am | 25/07/12

      Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting fed up of Wordpress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.


Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more



Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter