While the Government’s new taxes on the mining sector and tobacco are central to bringing the budget back into deficit over the next few years, there are a lot of nasties in this budget in both cuts and taxes that will bring in a tidy sum for Wayne Swan. Here’s the top 10 with a few bonus ones at the end. 

Just one highlight from the Expenditure Review Committee.

Child care rebate cap reduced: This is going to mean tens of thousands of families around Australia will be paying more for childcare - it’s that simple. The Government is set to reduce the cap on the annual Child Care Rebate from its current rate of $7778 to $7500. They will also pause of the indexation of the maximum that can be claim. This cut will save the Government a whopping $86.3 million in tax.

Increased fuel tax on ethanol: In the truly indecipherable language of the Rudd Government this has been named “an energy content-based fuel excise system.” This entails an excise on ethanol fuel of 25 cents per litre from 1 July, and will bring in a tidy $276.5 million over the next four years. The Government claims that this is to off-set the grant payment to domestic ethanol producers, which is to be reduced from 22.5 cents per litre from July 2011 to nothing by 2015. But interestingly this doesn’t mean that the tax will be abolished by 2015, with tax only go down to 12.5 cents over the same time period.

Green car innovation fund: This program was launched with much hoopla but has failed to switch into gear. Funding for the Green Car Innovation Fund will be cut by $200 million over the next three years, which the Government says is the fault of carmakers who failed to take up the offer of extra funding.

Cracking down on the disability support pension: From July 1 2011 the Government will introduce a new test for those on the disability that will be conducted by an allied health professional. This is the lead up to a bigger change which will take place in mid 2012 when: “claimants without sufficient evidence of a future work capacity of less than 15 hours per week may be referred to an alternative income support payment and offered employment assistance through Job Services Australia or Disability Employment Services.” Basically it will force more people off the disability pension, well the Government certainly hopes it will, cause they say it’s going to bring in $383.4 million over the next four years.

Going after cash-in-hand businesses: Well this is only a nasty if you’re on the wrong side of it. The Government is coming after all those businesses that prefer to deal in untaxed cash-in-hand. The Government is giving the Tax Office $107.9 million to wage the war, but are calculating they’ll end up making $366.5 million from it. The Government also hopes to bring in $2.7 billion in extra GST from businesses who aren’t lodging accurate GST tax statements.

Cuts to the AFP and ASIO: The $23.5 million cuts to the Australian Federal Police weren’t called as much in the budget papers, they were “identified savings” after an audit and are supposed to be retained by the AFP. The problem is there’s nothing indicating where that money is going, it’s just money saved and looks like a cut.  Over at ASIO they’ll be feeling it too with $15 million worth of cuts over the next four years.

Cutting boys education initiative: Apparently a specialised education program for boys isn’t worth the bother. The Government is cutting the Boys Education National Initiative which will save them $5.9 million over five years.

Water tanks to go down the drain: Funding for water tanks and piping for grey water use will be reduced by $179.7 million over five years. Among other things this program provided up to $10,000 to surf life saving clubs to install rainwater tanks. When they put it like that it’s hard to argue against the logic of cutting back on this thing.

Cuts to cancer treatment funding: Almost $90 million will be saved by cutting a program that gives patients better access to radiation oncology services. The Government will argue that its investments in health, with programs targeted at cancer treatment and research, will compensate for this, but if you’ve benefited from this program or stand to you’d be a little nervous about that reassurance.

Changes to the PBS and grant programs from health and ageing: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme changes will mean the Government will save $1.9 billion over four years. Although it’s those big pharma companies that will pick up the tab, so nobody will kick up much of a fuss. The Government is saving almost $90 million on what it calls “grant reprioritisation” from the department of health. Basically it’s cutting future health grants but can’t say to from where, although it’s worth $88.9 million over the next four years.


Some bonus nasties….
Centrelink fraud prevention and compliance: $56.6m over four years. Enhanced spending on fraud detection to stop the abuse of the social welfare system by organised crime groups.

Family Court: $10.5m over four years. Not proceeding with filling four vacancies for judicial officers within the Family Court and Federal Magistrates Court. Government says: “reflects an expected reduction in the workload and improved administrative systems”.

National Native Title Tribunal: $7.8m over four years. Rationalising number of registries for the tribunal

Australian Learning and Teaching Council: $18.4m over three years. To be superseded by the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency

Family Day Care Start Up Payment: $14.8 million over four years. Government to cease providing the payment, which is $1500 or $5000 in remote areas. Government says: “payments have not been successful in encouraging potential carers to establish FDC services as an ongoing business”.

Skills for the Carbon Challenge: $20m over four years. “Skills for Sustainability Incentive Pilot” program axed. Government says: No longer required, has been superseded by National Green Skills Agreement announced last year.

Business Skills for Visual Artists: $2m over four years. Surely one of the more controversial cuts in the budget, this axes the Cultural Development Program element of the Business Skills for Visual Artists program. Government says: “The Government provides ongoing support for artists through programs funded by the Australia Council.”

Caring for our Country: $81.3m over four years. Funding for the National Heritage Trust of Australia will be reduced by $70.4m, and for Landcare by $10.9m. Government says: “The Caring for our Country program will still provide funding of more than $1.6 billion over the next four years. A significant proportion of the savings come from departmental expenses.”

Environment Research Facilities Program: $3m over two years. Funding redirected. Government says: “has been replaced by the National Environmental Research Program”.

Point Nepean – Uni of Melbourne rental guarantee: $2.1m over six years. Axed, with the funds to be “redirected towards other Government priorities”.

Rainwater and Greywater initiative: $179.7m over five years. Reduced funding for the program that gives rebates of up to $500 for the cost of installing rainwater tanks or piping for greywater use. Government says: “in response to lower than expected demand”.

National Urban Water and Desalination Plan: $70.3m over two years. Program supports desalination, recycling and stormwater harvesting projects to secure water supply security in cities. Government says: funding reduced “in response to lower than expected demand”.

Family Tax Benefit Part A, requirements for 16 to 20 year olds: $31.2million over five years. Participation in education or training required. An anti-teen bludger measure.

Indigenous Communities Strategic Investment: $48.3m over five years Reduces funding to the program. Government says: “funds to be used towards the establishment of the National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples” and other programs.

Notification process for compensation recipients: $9.1m over four years. Smart move: compo payers will have to let Centrelink know about payments to clients from July next year. Centrelink can better assess the person’s entitlement to benefits.

Major office machines: $4.2m over five years. Government will switch to using a whole-of-government process for buying major equipment for offices.

85 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • DaisyMae says:

      08:40pm | 11/05/10

      Oh dear I hear they are targeting the disabled again..more votes lost
      Credit card intrest rates will go up.. I can’t see people being happy there
      Things just seem to go from bad to worse

    • Sherekahn says:

      10:43am | 12/05/10

      Don’t give us heaps Daisye, I am an age pensioner that is also disabled.
      My wife is also an age pensioner.  We manage very well thank you because we live like pensioners should.  We never play poker machines, we never eat out, nearly all our clothes are from charity shops or church rummage sales.  I dress better now than when I was working.  We live in a small old Queensland workman’s house that we own.  We are not fat because we don’t overeat!  We brew our own beer and buy cask dry red wine.
      I agree with all these cuts, indeed I have suggested to Government that since pensioners use the majority of health care facilities, they should continue paying Medicare when they are pensioners.  It would cost us $4.50 per week.  I would prefer to pay this than see Government filling Australia with another 10 million migrants supposedly to pay for aging Australians in the future!
      Too many pensioners don’t care, saying they won’t be alive then, what does it matter.  It matters because the whole world is overpopulated killing world fauna and flora such as trees and Orang-Utans.

    • Jenny says:

      01:59pm | 12/05/10

      Perhaps Sherekahn, you should try living so well on a single pension and see how you go, bearing in mind that lots of expenses are the same whether you are receiving the single or double pension.

    • R Gray says:

      09:04pm | 11/05/10

      Well what did you expect after they blew billions for stimulus packages which were not needed. The piper has to be paid!

    • Dan says:

      09:53pm | 11/05/10

      Well, kudos to them for paying the piper quickly - that’s to say, um, I mean trying to force the mining companies to pay quickly…

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:27pm | 12/05/10

      Kudos for what exactly?

      Labor identified “economic management” as the main issue for the next election and everything is focussed on that. Kudos for sucking in so many muppets who believe their spin maybe.

      Labor has made and broken so many promises, paying off the massive debt they racked up is another PROMISE.

      The debt they claim saved us all from the GFC, included billions on useless websites, pink batts, and rorted second school halls. A completely GDP and infrastructure free zone, which had nothing to do with the GFC in reality. Rudd’s $900 handout to every second muppet to spend on a new plasma or overseas trip hardly goes down as economic management.

      It’s funny that you refer to the piper being paid, because Labor’s economic management is just a fairy tale.

      This promise to pay off THIER DEBT is subject to so many things, it is completely undreliable.

      Don’t expect the subservient media, with the cheer squad of Laurie Oakes etc., to actually query this though…

    • Shannon Naylor says:

      10:11pm | 11/05/10

      When will people ever learn. You voted for a damm Labour Government. They do it everytime, there are two things they are good at, 1. Spending and 2. Taxes to correct their repeated stuff ups.

    • Wooly says:

      03:35pm | 12/05/10

      Just remind me which side introduced the GST ... ?

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      04:08pm | 12/05/10

      @Wooly:  I believe Paul Keating as former PM of this country was going to introduce this GST himself, so it was around well before the Liberals got hold of it.  I do agree though that it was PM Howard (no GST ever) who put it into legislative effect.

    • fred says:

      05:05pm | 12/05/10

      Its the makeup of the people that are in the parties - usually Liberal & national have business backgrounds & have been successful all their lives. These are the people we need to balance the cheque book properly. Labor comes in every once in a while & is supposed to do things to favor working class. But the working class & the unions have been ignored in this circumstance - but the die hard laborite’s will always have an excuse to defend them. The truth is that it was the state of the country left by Howard &  China that have saved our bacon & nothing else. 43 bill just blown away!!

    • martin says:

      10:13pm | 11/05/10

      cuts to boys targeted education to save less than Rudd spends on 2 or 3 trips per year. taxing ethanol fuel so much for environmentally friendly fuel options.
      prolonging the agony of the family court for working families…........etc
      This government is a joke

    • Fred says:

      10:21pm | 11/05/10

      I do not agree with his requirement for an allied health professional as this will increase costs considerably. I was interviewed for 15 minutes for my application & it was knocked back (they knock back as many people as possible) & I was told I could do 15 hrs a week. 15 minutes is not a real assessment of what someone is suffering. After making a complaint, I actually got someone that knew what they where talking about & understood my plight.

      I am suffering from depression / shoulder impingement / bulging disc in back / swollen feet / Bursitis in one knee / emphysema & now addicted to the strongest painkillers (making me sick every other day) the list goes on. 

      So what am I going to do to work 15 hrs per week I ask ?? no response.
      I fail to see what things that I can do other to suffer more pain. Why try to bring broken people into a work environment - I cant do anything to help someone in an accident. I cant walk 20ft without running out of breath. I cant lift anything - I have difficulty lifting my arms up to a desk & driving is pure agony as the action of moving my arms - inflames the muscles.

      If I had not complained I would have been dragged through the process of being helped to deal with my problems & try to find work. I do not need help to find work - I NEED A COUPLE OF OPERATIONS - I NEED A HEALTH SYSTEM. Once I have those I can be a part of society again & not be a drag on the system. I can then hold my head up in public again!!! How many people are stuck in this situation continually costing the government money for welfare when a couple of grand will fix me up???

    • Rover says:

      11:29am | 12/05/10

      “Dragged through the process of being helped to deal with my problems”?
      How is that a bad thing?

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      12:32pm | 12/05/10

      I also had to be “dragged through the system” for 2 years!!!!....before I was finally put on DSP: there was nothing “instant” about it as some disingenous people claim.  Sometimes I wish I had a broken hip/leg/arms/skull whatever, so that my disabilities could be seen with the naked eye i.e. plaster/braces etc.  You don’t have to be sitting in a wheelchair to be disabled and that is what worries me about this.  The “allied health professional” will be looking for one thing, and one thing only (ergo, fixed mindset), to get people off DSP to receive a lesser amount of money:  it is biased “from the start”.  Whilst I fully support enhanced methods to go after people who deliberately set out to defraud Centrelink e.g. organised crime gangs, my fear is that this will hurt people who don’t.  I foresee many appeals to the Tribunal.  Some compassionate society/politicians.  And this, coming from a Labor government!  Whatever happened to social justice?  Is that a dirty word now?  Obviously it is if one wants to be re-elected.  BTW I did not vote for Labor at the last election and never will.

    • Frank Buble says:

      12:41pm | 12/05/10

      What he is saying is that it was not easy enough for him to get his welfare cheques, having to go to a second interview and the like…....
      Perhaps we could refine the system so he could just send a text and the money would start flowing?

    • Fred says:

      02:51pm | 12/05/10

      I am saying that as a person truly suffering from chronic depression (other mental diseases require help as well) - we need help not hindrance. If my application was given the assessment it deserved, say an hour at least - instead of 15 minutes - then I would not have been forced to go through a pain full & distressing complaint process. The mindset is not - Hi you are disabled - what can we do to help?? Then receive a fair assessment - No one is helping me deal with my problems at all - 

      It is all about how many people you can keep off disability & its like, hey!! I have a scoreboard out the back.

      It is never about helping anyone - I am 51 & paid taxes all my life - when I was unemployed - I started a business & trained & employed people.

      Now I need help & when you are not well you just do not need the pain. If I do not feel up to a process because of disability - in this case my depression - then my disability should be taken into consideration.

      People should be assessed fully & if there is an opportunity to place them & 5K would fix the disability problem - no matter what the problem is - it should be spent - if it’s worthwhile. 

      What is wasting money is putting every person through training schemes to write a resume or use a computer when they already have evidence of being able to do it. My wife has run a business for some 15 years - yet time & time again she has to repeat courses that do nothing for jobs that are not there & just reap in money for the organization handling her case.

    • Graham S says:

      03:04pm | 12/05/10

      Very simple solution. Go out and a buy a gun, shoot a politician, preferably a rabid monarchist catholic nutter and presto, off to a comfortable jail cell, 3 meals a day, all your health problems will be taken care off at tax payers expense and whilst your lawyer is pleading for a reduced jail time based on an insanity plea you’re woes will be taken care off. An added bonus is time away from the wife and think of all the new drinking buddies you’ll meet inside for a catch up drink on release. Sweet

    • David says:

      10:38pm | 11/05/10

      “Changes to the PBS and grant programs from health and ageing: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme changes will mean the Government will save $1.9 billion over four years. Although it’s those big pharma companies that will pick up the tab…”

      If you seriously believe this I have a bridge in Sydney that I would like to sell you.

    • Graham says:

      06:55am | 12/05/10

      Agreed.  I work in the generic pharmaceutical industry.  Major (and I do mean major) reforms were put in place only two years ago.  These reforms were meant to take 10 years to mature, but here we go with yet another bashing.  There have already been significant job losses and the closure of a number of businesses.  These changes will force wholesale restructuring of the industry to the point where it may well collapse - meaning less generic medicine for everyone.  The “big pharma” companies are actually Australian businesses with 1000 or less employees (albeit owned by overseas parents).  They’re staggering now.  This will drive them to their knees.

    • watchingwithinterest says:

      08:48am | 12/05/10

      This government has no foresight and no understanding of basic financial decision making.  The higher the risks taken by a company the higher the expected return otherwise the risk is not worth it.  mining and now pharmaceuticals, what will be next, banking ?????

    • D Sullivan says:

      11:31pm | 11/05/10

      This is crazy do they really think people would want to survive on a Disability Pension on their own accord.. :( I don’t think so.. My husband has been on a Disability Pension due to being born with Spina Bifida and has never been able to work and has had to struggle to get anywhere in life he has not had the option to work and earn a wage but take a pittance off the government and now will have to even fight for this… It is also an insult to careers this will lead to Careers coming into question due to bureaucratic bull****, if Disability Pensioners go onto a different payment with no 100% guarantee of ever getting a job… wake up I would love to see one of these Politicians to live on a Pension for atleast a year to get a taste of how hard it is… Especially for people that have been born with conditions and have never been or are able to work and earn a wage… Why not have a Disability Payment (my husband is only 36) why put him and everyone else under the pension age in the class of Pensioner :( it is not only older people with Disabilities…. 

      Also don’t they think families are also struggling they want people to work and then slug them with higher childcare ??? doesn’t make sense why don’t we get a say in what happens it is after all us tax payers that you even have a budget to make.. I even bet the Politicians will get their annual pay increase, we would save a damn fortune if we had award wages for Politicians smile

    • Robynne says:

      05:36am | 12/05/10

      well if he has a disability so be it, but whats stopping you getting off your bum and getting a full-time job and swap roles, its time the gov stopped handing out money to people.  Why not train into a job he can do, people with spinabifida do have good jobs and work full-time you know. if you lived in another country you wouldnt get anything.

    • Nicole says:

      09:11am | 12/05/10

      Robynne, pull up You don’t know what other ailments this man has. How do you know this lady doesn’t work? How do you know they don’t have children to support? It’s all very well for you to sit there, behind your PC and act holier than thou, but until you know the full circumstances of this family, don’t sit there and judge. And she is 100% correct in saying that these vultures will continue to receive pay increases and all the other perks for doing jack sh!t. This Government is an absolute disgrace and the sooner Rudd is kicked out on his ass the better.

    • Brian says:

      09:40am | 12/05/10

      Nicole .. If they have children then I don’t want ANY of my tax money going to them. If the guy is disabled then it’s not his fault, give him some money ... but if they have children ... I no longer have any sympathy ... what a stupid thing to do .. have children when you can barely afford to live.

    • Eye4anEye says:

      12:59pm | 12/05/10

      They are not making him “fight” the system for the disability pension they are implementing a standard method of assessing disability - if he’s disabled he’ll get checked and nothing will change (only people that should complain about this are ones unable to satisfy an independant assessor of their “disability).

      In regards to your comment on pensions/pensioners it has nothing to do with age a pension is a stipend paid out for various circumstances ie widow’s pension, disability and old age pension - it just so happens the old age pension is the most common and therefore most often applied use of the term pensioner.

    • Fred says:

      04:07pm | 12/05/10

      I agree with D Sullivan in that there needs to be an incentive to work. If you are going to lose $30 a week or sometimes more by going to work, are you going to put your time into getting a job - This is supposed to be a caring government being Labor I thought.

      To Robyn - well you should go to these countries & work there - then you wouldn’t have to worry about leaches on the tax you pay. Have fun putting up with far increased crime rates. Good go to America - you cant even walk or drive in some places without fear of being held up or raped. Or better Papua New Guinea where the biggest industry is security guards!! People have to eat & there has to be a job there anyway - there will always be a percentage of unemployed - if its not one person it will be another.  Get used to it.

    • Robynne says:

      05:02pm | 12/05/10

      Nicole, my husband has a spinal injury and has done so for the past 25 years , a work realted incident we didnt get compo for.  I work full-time, and managed to bring up 2 kids, supported my mother till she died, and also studied part-time.  So I know what it is like to have a disabled husband, but instead of whingeing about it, I got off my bum got myself an education and go on with the job.  I have never taken a hand out from the government EVER !!!  I dont agree with the gov getting perks etc eitehr, but I’m sick of people whinging about it, yet do nothing to improve their situation themselves.

    • Jodie says:

      05:10pm | 12/05/10

      Yeah Nicole, because the Coalition have always been so much better at helping the disadvantaged!
      No Government is perfect but I would prefer this one that is actually trying to fix problems in health, education, childcare and other services after a decade of neglect by the Howard Government. They have only had three years with a global financial crisis to deal with as well and everyone is blaming them for not instantly fixing problems that the last Government couldn’t fix in the nearly 13 years they had. I think they deserve more time to prove themselves.

    • Jenny says:

      11:43pm | 11/05/10

      Here we go again. Target those members of society who can’t stick up for themselves, while we bow down to asylum seekers by spending millions housing them in a 4 star motel!  Most Disabled folk are too ill or are unable to stand up for themselves so they are fair game.  Why should the disabled be targetted to fix up this goverment’s unbelievable stuff ups!

    • Fred says:

      09:11am | 12/05/10

      I agree - if he has spinabifida who looks after the kids & runs them around & does the housework / cooks meals etc. I am on disability & I need my wife at home to help do all that - I cant mop the floor / wash clothes / driving is agony. As I have depression - I am seriously scared of being alone & if I was to be left at home continually I would be worried that I might do myself some harm. In these circumstances the family unit needs the other person to function & do these things. In my circumstance I have four kids that are still at school - 3 HAVE to work to get the things usually supplied by parents - they all work at McDonalds which means 3 am starts & shifts all over the place. If you are on disability it means that you are not capable of doing all these things. I am anti drug of any kind yet now I am addicted to stuff & i was not aware of the repercussions as it was not explained to me by my doctor. Every day I live with nausea / headaches / constipation / generally feeling sick - would you expect to be doing all the other stuff while in that condition. I should have a carer - but no they have knocked that back as well.

    • bella starkey says:

      09:23am | 12/05/10

      I think the point is that a lot of people on the DSP aren’t actually disabled. It has been incredibly easy to rort, really all you need is a sympathetic GP at present.

    • fred says:

      09:35am | 12/05/10

      Disability is incredibly hard to get now & it has nothing to do with a sympathetic GP - they have no input really. The std thing they do is knock everyone & then those that really need it will complain & get some action. 10 years ago it was easy to get onto Disability pension - but it all changed with Howard quite a few years ago. Yes some people work if they can - but look at the pittance they give us - if I did nothing then we would not eat. Everything has gone up 300% or more & yet we are still expected to live on $220 a week - anyone want to try that out for a couple of weeks ?? I thought not. I saw an article about a woman who’s husband was on 200 k per year & could not live “properly” - I would love a quarter of that.

    • Keith hammersmith says:

      12:47pm | 12/05/10

      Fred, you seem like a coherant person, and have managed to troll this website and blog intelligently, even with your disability, this indicates to me that you are capable of making a wage. Many opportunites exist that could have you working from your computer at home, instead of relying on government hand outs.

    • fred says:

      03:09pm | 12/05/10

      To Keith - Great get me a job in front of a computer - that’s about all I can do. Unfortunately I have chronic depression & I am addicted to opiates by my doctor making me feel nauseous & sick every other day - your offer will have to wait until I can get off them unless you can put up with someone that can only work every second day. Time taken to get off them 12 months possibly.

    • Don says:

      05:23pm | 12/05/10

      Fred - sometimes you need to just grow up and help yourself instead of asking everyone else to help you out of your depression. You’re full of excuses - work through it, go to a free GP and get a referral to a drug counsellor, make the effort instead of complaining all the time. I’ve been diagnosed with chronic depression and PTSD earlier in my life, and you know what ? It just got to the point where I said stuff it, I’ll fix myself. And I got off my bum and helped myself. I now work full time, have a great life. Really there are so many free programs that are accessible to you because you are on DSP - you’ve got a pensioner concession card, thats practically a free ticket anywhere!! Stop complaining and DO SOMETHING POSITIVE about your situation. There are many people in far, far worse situations then yours.

    • EJ says:

      12:03am | 12/05/10

      Force more people off the disability pension… oh that’s right I forgot…you can be cured overnight right Mr Rudd? What fools we have running this Government! Never…ever… have I felt any emotion for Politics in this country but today I can say I feel ashamed, betrayed and quite frankly frightened for the future of this country & many Australians especially the disabled who struggle the most.

    • yvette says:

      06:19am | 12/05/10

      i wonder what the “selection criteria” will be for who gets to keep their pittance and who is forced to try to work. hope its fair and does weed out those few that dont really need the DSP.
      i have 3 disabled (adult) children and would hate to think that they would be forced to work.

    • Brian says:

      08:24am | 12/05/10

      Genuinly disabled people need our support and should not be targeted, however, not all people who are recieving Disability Pensions are genuine. I have a friend who is an investigator and the lengths that some people will go to fake disabilities is astounding. I have seen it myself, I used to live next door to a guy who had been on a pension for years who would work in his shed all day yet magically turn in to a cripple whenever anyone would knock on his door.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:45pm | 12/05/10

      Yvette is right - there are plenty of fakers on disability,  just like there are plenty of people on the dole who simply don’t want to work. As long as this cut doesn’t harm those who are genuinely disabled, and they continue to get the support and assistance they need, I say bring it on.  I’m more than happy for my tax money to help those who really need it, but I resent it going to those who are capable of working but feel that it’s beneath their dignity to do so.

    • Matt says:

      02:25pm | 12/05/10

      The truly disabled will always be financially supported in this country.  Perhaps not sufficiently, but they are supported.  The problem is 1 in 5 ‘working age’ Australians receive some form of income support from the government.  Think about that, that’s crazy.  5.6% of working age people receive the Disability Support Pension, that’s 1 in 20, that seems excessive to me.  Disabled?  Really?

      Here’s an interesting and little known fact:  2008-09 tax revenue from incomes (i.e. income tax paid by the working people of this country) was $125.7 billion, and $124.5 billion of this was paid out to ‘social security and welfare’.  This includes the aged pension.  Bottom line = ALL the tax working people pay on their incomes is just enough to pay for all the handouts to those that are not working.  Nothing is left over for other government spending, that all has to come from other taxes e.g. company tax, GST, excise, etc
      (figures sourced from Treasury 08/09 budget outcomes)

      I will support any initiative that addresses this problem.  By removing those on the DSP that ought not to be it will free up some $ to increase payments to the truly disabled and their carers - something that is long overdue in this country.

    • mtdd says:

      12:23am | 12/05/10

      Yet $10million to the union movement to run “education” programs…Pfft.Lame duck budget by a lame duck govt.

    • The Shoe says:

      06:07am | 12/05/10

      The frightening thought is that should an Abbott led coalition bring down the next Budget - 2011 - I would imagine there will be even more pruning to the welfare tree.

    • Fine pants says:

      09:06am | 12/05/10

      Good. Get those bludgers to make themselves useful. This country no longer needs so much welfare.

    • Billy B says:

      10:10am | 12/05/10

      The Shoe - Yes, but Abbot wouldn’t have spent like a drunken sailor.

    • fred says:

      06:10pm | 12/05/10

      Why do you think that way “Fine Pants” - I have paid taxes for years to make sure that I have help in disability & pension in retirement. No one has or is paying my way in any way. In the future you will need this essential service - I hope not - but your odd’s are not good.

    • Bemused says:

      07:20am | 12/05/10

      The Hunter Valley is not happy and can you blame them? They have been given nothing along with most if not all mining towns in Australia. Newcastle has supported Labor for years and I think its time we had a change of position. Targeting the disabled will affect our town as well as every other town in Australia. People with less money have less money to spend. Not that I personally feel they have oodles of money, they hardly get enough to live on. The smoking tax will affect small business, as extra spending money will now go to the Government in the form of tax. Kevin Rudd seems to have adopted Tony Abbotts policies, the ones he would have lost votes for like the smoking tax and targeting the disabled. They have made it easier for the Liberals to win. I defiantly am not impressed and feel now we probably would have been better off under Howard.As a footnote let me add I have never voted Liberal in my life. This is coming from an ex as of today labor voter.

    • Wendy says:

      07:34am | 12/05/10

      The Family Court and Federal Magistrates Court is already struggling with not enough Judicial Registrars.  My son has been trying to get an interim hearing to see his little boy (who he has not seen for 18 months), been back to court 3 times, now has to wait another 2 months for the next available spot.  They need MORE - not less.

    • Sustainable Populator says:

      07:43am | 12/05/10

      Your comment:TheBaby Bonus should have beencuit after the second child but motherhood is still a sacred cow even tho Australia will soon be over populated.

    • Sustainable Populator says:

      07:44am | 12/05/10

      The Baby Bonus should have been cut after the second child but motherhood is still a sacred cow even tho Australia will soon be over populated.

    • malheureuxmaus says:

      08:08am | 12/05/10

      ‘Parenthood’ I think you mean. Takes two to collect a babybonus.

    • Larissa Zimmerman says:

      08:44am | 12/05/10

      Just to throw my 2 bobs worth in. The mining tax may help us stop raping the Earth and the childcare changes may help us stop the over population. Thinking small - I may like to have my own child(ren) one day and one person can’t make a difference. Thinking big - this planet and many of its homeless children actually need a few good (wo)men to look after it / them. grin Hope you all have a great day and remember that for every minute of ill feeling we lose 60 seconds of happiness that we can never get back.

    • Bob says:

      09:04am | 12/05/10

      We should all be disappointed but not surprised. The introduction of the mining tax and increase in tobacco tax should have prepared us for this disappointment. This government knows it faces heat over the deficit and is raising money any way it can without increasing personal tax.
      The predictions are overly optimistic and based on the assumption the mining tax will be passed by the senate and if it is, mining development will continue at the same rate.
      The claim that incentive programs were under utilised only means that the amounts offered were not enough to induce people to invest. I agree the baby bonus should be stopped. If population growth is a problem, why encourage it.
      Carers do need to be better scrutinised. I know some who gave up work because they could the carers benefit, and the husbands do not need carers at all. The system is too easy to beat. The question is, how will the government do it.

    • Fred says:

      04:30pm | 12/05/10

      Hi Bob - population is not a problem in the right ratio of retirees to working people. They are encouraging people to have babies & bring new people into Australia to grow the population to pay for baby boomer retirements. There are a huge number of people about to retire that want a pension. Though the amount of people entering into Australia should have had all that covered - problem is they are just starting another boom - in 65 years time there is going to be another boom that will have to be dealt with. But they do not have to worry about this now.

      Carers are very well scrutinized - eventually the false ones can be weeded out - but it needs whistle blowers - not false & untrue claims by people who really do not know the truth.

    • Rob says:

      09:07am | 12/05/10

      So if i understand this correctly ,the money saved by reducing disability pensions will be paid to employment agencies to retrain or find jobs ,for less than 15 hours a week ,that dont exist.That makes perfect sense.

    • Fred says:

      09:27am | 12/05/10

      You have to prove that you cannot get a job through an employment agency before getting disability. I can get a job - I just need operations so I can do something towards getting a job. How many people are stuck in this position?? But no they force you to go to work the way you are - it doesn’t matter if you are in continual pain & every move is torture.  Yes everyone has to go through the “process” they pay people to train you for a job that does not exist. They teach you to deal with your pain (waste of time as I have been suffering for 20 years with my back pain & still working until it got that bad that I couldn’t work.)  Any job that I am able to do is full time - Maybe I can paint Christmas cards with a paint brush in my mouth??  So whats it going to do - put everyone that should be at home on the dole - whats that going to save - what about the extra costs of having a health professional to check you when already I have had a battery of tests to prove what is wrong - they already have health professionals that interview everyone (15 minutes max) & knock everyone back.  They need to assess people & then push them through for operations, if it looks like they could return to work after being operated on. That would save a lot of money - as i could be back at work for 5k of operations - yet now I am going to be a continual drag on the economy & cost a lot more in pension payments.

    • Bludger says:

      09:26am | 12/05/10

      bye bye rudd.. I’m not currently enrolled to vote but you have motivated me to do so and kick you out!!!!

    • Adam says:

      09:33am | 12/05/10

      “Cuts to the AFP and ASIO: The $23.5 million… and $15 million respectively”...
      “Cutting boys education initiative to save $5.9 million”...

      Our police are already in low numbers across the country and home security certainly of considerable importance and this is where they decide to make cuts to? Disgusting.

      Boy’s education. So many studies have confirmed that boys are, generally speaking, the largest sufferers from dyslexia and poor performance (they excel in sports, etc. but they lack absorbing literacy, etc.).. $5.9M would help a considerable number of boys and this is just a foul grab at money that would hardly make a dint in the overall budget.

      “Cuts to cancer treatment funding: Almost $90 million…” - because they promise their new Health reform will recoup this and provide better services. Um, it hasn’t happened yet, you’re going to save it until the election and in the meantime how many people have to suffer because of this disgusting cut.

      This whole thing stinks and I can’t help but loathe our current Government. It’s always been Greens or Libera for me. This is out-right wrong now. Overboard.

    • john says:

      09:40am | 12/05/10

      Business Skills for Visual Artists program was pretty dubious. The org that ran this program -ABAF—is paid 1.5million each year and delivers less than a million each year in tax deductable donations to arts projects. ABAFs CEO is paid more than 250k to do very little.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      09:48am | 12/05/10

      I see all the whinging liberals have marched past Abbott office for their free and uneducated, morning spin pill. You all look very bitter and twisted because the Rudd government have done amazingly well.

    • Mavis says:

      12:09pm | 12/05/10

      Straight out of the Hawker Britton cue card. - “10 (1)  Accusing your opponents to neutralise their observations about yourself.”

    • Jenny says:

      01:37pm | 12/05/10

      You are kidding!!!!!! If you think they have done such an amazing job, please tell the rest of us where so we can understand what good has been done with all those billions of dollars of our money Krudd and his cronies have squandered.

    • Fred says:

      04:33pm | 12/05/10

      See how the polls go tomorrow shall we - not looking good for them at the moment though.

    • Fred says:

      09:49am | 12/05/10

      Why shouldn’t there be welfare for those that really need it - I have worked all my life - I am 51 - when I couldn’t get a job I started my own business & employed & trained people - despite having a bad back. I paid my taxes for many years & many times I have lost my own savings rather than go on welfare. Now I have nothing left - I am not happy being socially isolated. I am not happy that I cannot provide for my family. To see my children miss out continually for even the basics in life is heart breaking. I have depression due to not being able to work & that I am missing out on all the big dollars flowing over in WA & other mining states. For me a job in mining would mean another chance at owning my own house.  Anyone want to switch places is welcome.

    • L says:

      01:46pm | 12/05/10

      Hey Fred.  How about you cancel your internet for starters - that should give you a few extra dollars a month.  And you seem to be able to sit comfortably at a computer all day and type - wish my back could handle that kind of abuse.  Glad to know that my tax dollar is paying for you and your computer and your lazy days spent trolling the internet.  Thrills me to bits.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      04:03pm | 12/05/10

      @ L says:02:46pm | 12/05/10.  What a nasty comment.  Is Fred not supposed to have anything that “you” consider a luxury just because he is on a DSP?  I didn’t know there was a requirement that people on DSP must have no TV, microwave, internet, computer et al.  You really are the pits.  How do you know that he is on the computer “all” day?  He may get up and move around the house for all you know.  I am not allowed to spend more than an hour on a computer at any one time because of a bulging disc of which there is little left and once it prolapses I could be paralysed from the waist down.  You would love that wouldn’t you? It would please your self satisfied, smug, holier than thou outlook.  You would then be able to say:  “now” you are disabled. Remember this L:  “There but for the grace of God go I” and think yourself very, very lucky that you are not in Fred’s position or mine.  Some of the vitriolic and uncompassionate comments on this article today have left me feeling quite despondent and wondering where is this so-called “fair go” that Australia is supposed to be famous for.  It doesn’t exist anymore and in fact, I’m wondering if it ever did.  Hope you never have an accident L or lose your job, or get old and frail.

    • Bethany says:

      06:07pm | 12/05/10

      Depression, and other ‘invisible’ ailments, are incredibly hard to verify. This leaves the allied health professional in a difficult position. Given her role as gatekeeper, her default position must be that anyone who claims a mental illness is faking it. (I would bet that the gatekeepers will be given targets to meet) It is therefore down to the client to prove that they aren’t. To a genuinely depressed individual, this can seem an overwhelming and almost insurmountable task. (Writing this, I wonder whether this is a deliberate strategy to drive truly ill people off sickness benefits.) Be that as it may, to have to prove that you are sick, especially when you don’t actually have a bone protruding through your skin, is an onerous task. How much more difficult then if you are prey to the black dog and can’t find the energy to drag yourself from the bed in the morning? What about a bit of compassion for those suffering and some recognition that not all illness is visible.

    • Gary Davey says:

      10:13am | 12/05/10

      Vote Labor in and then be surpised - you must be joking.  Gough and the loonies did their best to wreck Australia - Crudd and his travelling circus of spin doctors and liars are simply trying to get the job done.

      The light on the hill was extinguished a long time ago.  The soldiers who died for Australia must be stirring in their graves.

    • Angie says:

      10:24am | 12/05/10

      Kevin and Wayne - spend like drunken sailors and then nickel & dime the poorest people in society ......there is Labor the “caring” party.

      Disgraceful.

      Tony the next PM - a man of conviction & courage.

    • Pete from Sydney says:

      04:49pm | 12/05/10

      Tony ain’t going to be the next PM, labour will murder the bums and BTW he’s a man of little conviction and not terribly much courage…on a push bike maybe, but not so much in life…he’s flip flopped more than most

    • Chris says:

      10:30am | 12/05/10

      Meh. If people stopped looking for the Government to manage their lives and took control of their own lives they’d be better off. If you want to know who’s responsible for your life being the way it is look in the mirror.

    • Hannah says:

      03:50pm | 12/05/10

      You said it Chris!!! Thank you!

      its beyond helping ourselves though too. we need to be less selfish and greedy and “me me me” focused and help those around us in need.  where has community gone?

      it doesnt matter which government is in…there is no left or right people! they are exactly the same! exactly the same!
      don’t wait for the government to help those in need - those of us that can help individuals now should do so. one person CAN make a difference in another person’s life.

      it could be a regular meal with a family you know are struggling, transportation to appointments for elderly who can drive and cant afford taxis, setting up a co-op for fruit n veg between a few families, passing on clothes that you know longer wear to someone you know needs them. it could be going for regular walks or coffees with your friend who has depression or mental health issues to lend a listening ear.
      Or you could do the big stuff, open up yor house to a homeless person or a foster child…
      why wait for the government when you and i can make a difference now with what we have.
      cheers!

    • Fred says:

      04:38pm | 12/05/10

      Hannah - your an absolute Legend - it couldn’t have been said simpler or more to the point.

    • karen says:

      10:58am | 12/05/10

      Brian says:10:40am | 12/05/10
      .......your an idiot.  We all pay taxes so that we have access to welfare if we need it. You obviously have no idea about living with a disability and implying that people with disabilities should be denied the right to have children is discriminatory and just plain nasty.  Disabled people have the same rights as everyone else in Australia…....the same rights that apply to you.

    • KH says:

      12:00pm | 12/05/10

      I don’t think so.  Having children means bringing more people into the community, and the community should have some ability to have a say in who exactly brings them in.  If you are disabled and can’t work etc, then how the hell do you afford a kid? You can’t always have what you want.  All this BS about rights is getting kind of annoying - what about the rights of the people who pay taxes to have a say in who gets all this welfare?  If someone is already on disability, then asking for more handouts so they can have children is insulting.  Ditto for ‘single mothers’ who have more kids whilst on welfare - once they go on welfare, they should get no more handouts for additional children, since they can barely afford the one/s they have.  All these children growing up in poverty cannot be good for the whole community.

    • No Sympathy says:

      01:12pm | 12/05/10

      Yep, ashamedly i have relatives that rort the system claiming the disability pension due to their laziness and uneducated attitudes.  Its almost a science for them (they’re not dumb), they know what to say, when to say it and how to say it.  They have fabricated witness statements and all sorts of crap.  They have children and make no attempt to to provide a better future for them or seek to make them contributing members of society.  These scum need to be dealt with heavy handedly, their rights to children should be restricted to a video call so they can’t unduly influence them to be bludgers and live life playing a sympathy card.  If your disabled, the community needs to look after you but if you can’t look after your own and the community carries this, you obviously have no respect for the community, so don’t expect a sympathetic ear.

    • Rover says:

      01:26pm | 12/05/10

      KH, while I agree that people should make sure they can look after children before making the decision to have them, your suggestion that the community should have a say in who gets to have children is extremely disturbing.
      Who in your view has the right to have children? You might think I would be a terrible parent and I might think you would. But I don’t think either of us has any right to have a say in each other’s choice.

    • Justin says:

      11:01am | 12/05/10

      The people who elected this Government mantra was ‘Kevin 07’. The writing was on the wall right at the beginning! We had strippers in USA, temper tantrums on a RAAF flight over the food service and becoming agitated when Diggers couldn’t locate a hairdryer for a photo opportunity whilst in Afghanistan. Now we have backflips and broken promises.  I like many other Australians are growing tired of the Global Economic Meltdown wheelbarrow. It gets rolled out for anything and everything. Wake up Australia, we elected a dud by the name of Rudd. The mantra now is ‘Kevin Never Again’.

    • Henry says:

      02:45pm | 12/05/10

      In regard to the photograph used to illustrate this article; I put it to you that Leatherface would make a more stable, honest, caring and fiscally responsible Prime Minister of Australia than the weak pale little coward that currently holds that position.

      In Rudd we are talking of a man that lied about his upbringing, meeting Brian Burke, seeing strippers, eating a ‘dagwood dog’, seeing a test match at the GABBA, and eating his own ear wax - even when captured on film. To name but a few.

      Then there are the temper tantrums, dozens of broken electoral promises, and non-existent management of major projects.

      Yes Leatherface WOULD make a better PM than Crud. Come to think of it even my pet galah ‘Gerald’ would.

    • Craig says:

      03:26pm | 12/05/10

      I am worried about the cuts to the PBS. There is a medicine I need that I currently cannot afford because it is not subsidised on the PBS. Not only does this cut make it look like it will be harder for medicines to go on to the PBS, but it also looks like medical study funding which gives patients the treatments for a limited time for research will be cut as well. The cuts to health really disgust me and it really shows what hypocrites Labor are to claim they’re big on health and education.
      I bet everyone is loving their handouts now?

    • ben morgan says:

      04:24pm | 12/05/10

      It is interesting to see the comments about the DSP. 

      A close friend of mine (32 yrs of age) with a serious heart condition (not a smoker, not overweight, lives a healthy life, never been on the dole) had succesfully managed his own business until his condition affected his ability to meet client expectaions and work daily, sought disability support payments - had the 15 minute assessment and was deemed not eligible. 

      Taking the decision on board, he secured the only work he could and two weeks into the role suffered a series of massive heart attacks that very nearly took his life.  Medical assessment being that he pushed himself too far physically at work…  He has done further major damage to his health and no doubt will now be eligible for support - a shame the initial assessment wasn’t more thorough rather than simply trying to knock genuine people back…  Too many frauds seem to get support where the genuine applicants hve a real struggle…

    • KO says:

      05:22pm | 12/05/10

      Quick! Some one tell Eric even the government doesn’t care about men’s issues with the ending of the boys education program. A time he can legitimately bring it up!

    • from the trenches says:

      06:38pm | 12/05/10

      All grist for the mill!
                              But….tell me how can you budget increased taxes as ‘savings’ and not ‘revenue’?? Therefore are we closer to a surplus or further from reality?

    • stephen says:

      08:10pm | 12/05/10

      Savings and revenue ?
      Two sets bro’.
      Savings is what we can do and keep.
      Revenue is what we must do and save.

    • Marilyn says:

      09:07pm | 12/05/10

      The budget night tinkering is not the budget.  It is just a speech.

      The budget is $320 billion in taxes and other revenues and that is the only part of the country’s wealth that the government has any say over.

      There will still be 18% of the 320 billion pie spent on health, 40% on welfare, 8% on defence and education each and the rest into other areas.

      Don’t any of you know how this works?

      As for the so-called waste - for god’s sake, both the BER and HIP were very successful, 200,000+ jobs were saved over all and we are not in recession because of it.

      Do you want to be like Greece and Spain you dimwitted liberal hacks.

      And Paul you forgot one particularly stupid horror - almost $1 billion more to lock up completely innocent human beings.

      All in the name of pandering to rednecks and other clowns.

    • Luke says:

      12:17pm | 20/05/10

      Its just a speech alright… it also reflects the character of the government that one can choose to, or not, vote for next election…
      Given money is valuable (or should be if inflation is kept under control) what the government decides to do or not do with it is important…
      Don’t devalue a speech like this… it is important… the bulk of the money stays the same yes, but other things are the choice between future tax movements, up or down…
      BTW… Greece and Spain really DONT COMPARE to our country at all… not even remotely…

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter