On Monday, the series finale of Skins aired on SBS. The British television drama has both upset and pleased audiences for its often raw, truthful depiction of teenagers. Unlike many other teen dramas, Skins refuses to show holier-than-now youths, who resist drugs, sex and rock ‘n’ roll—in this case techno.  And while Skins’ characters indulge in activities that would make any parents squirm, it resists glorifying such behaviour.


Now in its fourth season, after gaining a new set of cast members in the third, the show is dealing with some even more confronting issues that are relevant to today’s youths. And just when Skins was doing everything right to get its youthful audience thinking about important subjects, it let us down in its final moments just to create some extra drama.

Last week, one of the characters, Freddie, was bashed to death by his girlfriend, Effy’s, psychologist. Effy had tried to kill herself and was taken to a rehabilitation centre. Her psychologist had become obsessed with her, his techniques made her worse than she was before, and finally his jealousy drove him to kill Freddie.

 

Dramatic yes, but what kind of message does this send Skins’ young audience? That mental health practitioners are unprofessional and can’t be trusted? That they will play with your mind to get what they want? That seeking help for a mental illness may not make you feel any better? And all of this is before we realise he is actually psychotic himself and a murderer.

This is a discouraging message to send to Skins’ viewers.  The show’s prime audience is 16 – 24, which happens to also be the demographic most affected by mental illness.  While Skins viewers are aware they are shown a fictional, dramatic character of a psychologist to shock and entertain, Skins is not alone in presenting these negative stereotypes; rarely are we shown positive or accurate depictions of mental health practitioners on screen.

Can you remember the last time you saw a realistic portrayal of a mental health practitioner in the media? Or perhaps you don’t even know what an accurate depiction of one is. You are not to blame.

In response to how mental health practitioners are portrayed in Hollywood, American psychologist Harriet T.Schultz, along with other members of the American Psychological Association, developed several categories of stereotypes that are shown on screen. They include:

‘Dr. Dippy,’ who is crazier or wackier than his patients, like Brenda’s parents in TV series Six Feet Under or TV’s Frasier Crane. ‘Dr. Evil,’ a corrupt mind-controller or homicidal maniac, like Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs. ‘Dr. Rigid,’ who stifles joy, fun and creativity. ‘Dr. Line-Crosser,’ who becomes romantically involved with a patient, like the police psychologist in The Departed or Richard Gere in Final Analysis. The psychologist in Skins fits in to every one of these categories.

Of course the entertainment industry is in the business of entertaining but there is a very real danger in these misrepresentations. If you’ve never visited a mental health professional, the media may well be your only understanding of what counselling is like. For a person experiencing a mental illness, seeking help is hard enough without having to wonder if the professional you see is going to be trust worthy or worth your while. 

Almost half the total population will experience a mental health disorder at some point in their life.  Depression alone is predicted to be one of the world’s largest health problems by 2020. Despite this only one third of people with a mental health disorder used health services for their mental illness in 2007.

One of the main reasons people don’t seek help is for fear of stigma, which SANE Australia says is predominately perpetuated by the media. In response to this, SANE has developed Stigma Watch, an initiative where the public can report any misleading representations of mental health issues shown in the media.

In a 2003 study, Steve G Hartwig and Catherine Delin of the University of South Australia surveyed Australians and found that psychologists are viewed unfavourably by the public, and that participants believed GPs, nurses and other ‘physical-health’ practitioners are ‘needed’ more than psychologists. Yet those who had seen a psychologist before were more willing to consult them again in the future.

With these reoccurring stereotypes put forward by the media – that mental health professionals are useless, a waste of money, crazy themselves, can’t be trusted or will save you with their love and friendship – it is little wonder that those who haven’t seen a mental health practitioner before have these ideas about the profession.

Unfortunately, despite its prominence, mental illness is still taboo in society. We have little understanding of those who experience it first hand and those who work hard to fight it.

On Monday Skins’ loyal audience watched Effy no better than the week before. Her treatment hadn’t worked, her mother was going to care for her instead of getting professional help, and her boyfriend was dead. It is hard to imagine that she was going to be ok – what a bleak message to send.

Most commented

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John GW says:

      08:35am | 23/09/10

      Movies tend to take one aspect of life and distort it completely.  Some people’s minds are completely moulded by what they see in movies.  I attribute a lot of problems in modern society to movies – some people see the distortions on TV and in the cinema and what they see becomes the norm.  How many women live like Carrie? How many think that the movie police and detectives (blame CSI, too) are actually like that?  I watched one episode of The Bill and saw a police superintendent’s car stolen!  How many think House depicts day-to-day, real doctors?  Even Numbers distorts reality because some things that may happen once in years becomes a daily happening.  And The Girl with a Dragon Tattoo paints a very bad picture of a social worker.  Having said that, I can’t stand Skins.  I hope not too many people live like that.

    • HappySkinsFan says:

      02:19pm | 23/09/10

      More people live like that than you would like to admit, John, while they might be slightly enhanced caricatures and the show does romanticize it a bit and it certainly doesn’t quite go as far as it could, Skins does do a very realistic depiction of teens today and even teens 10 or even 20 years ago.  I know I was once one of these kids, sort of a cross between Freddie and Cook with a bit of JJ added in for extra neurosis, but as a teen I’ve run across all the stereotypes Skins has and more wink

      I love its unflinching, non-judgmental, immoral depiction of modern teen life.  Too many series on TV hold back on the real harsh, heart-wrenching stuff, especially since many producers don’t want to be taking angry calls from parents who claim shows like Skins are not teaching their kids the way they want them to be taught.

      Consider yourself fortunate that you think teens don’t live like they do on Skins but also know that it is more common than you know and a lot harsher than what is depicted on TV.

    • Zeta says:

      08:48am | 23/09/10

      Well thanks, now I can delete the last two episodes I recorded because you spoiled them. Of course Skins is bleak. That’s the whole point. Four seasons of completely messed up bullshit happening to unrealistically gorgeous young people. Ill fated saphic love, drug fueled violence, death, it’s all there. It would have been stupid to end the series with ‘And Effy goes to a nice psychologist and everything is happy the end’. What kind of lazy writing would that have been?

    • Tim says:

      09:22am | 23/09/10

      Don’t worry Zeta,
      Freddie rises as a zombie in the last episode and Cook has to chop his head off with a shovel. Well worth a look.

    • AliceC says:

      09:50am | 23/09/10

      @Zeta,

      Still watch the episodes, I found them thrilling personally.

    • SD says:

      09:15am | 23/09/10

      Where did you get the data that the prime audience for skins is in the 16 - 24 year old age group?

      I disagree - and think it would more likely lie in the 30 to 50 year old bracket.

      The attraction of the show is that it is a form of voyeurism for older people that have left that world behind, or never had it.

      If you don’t have a reliable source for your target audience age bracket, we could examine the sorts of advertisements that are paired to it. Advertisements turning around home loans, cars, and health care would all point to a higher target audience.

      What sorts of ads are normally shown during skins?

    • HappyCynic says:

      04:14pm | 23/09/10

      It’s SBS, they might have 2 or 3 ad breaks during the whole show and most of them are short and are for other SBS shows wink

      Oh and since I record it and watch it later I fast forward the ads.  Who watches ads these days when there’s TiVo?

    • AdamC says:

      09:17am | 23/09/10

      I couldn’t agree more. I feel exactly the same about Rush’s depiction of Melbourne. I mean, what tourist is going to want to come here when we have bombings and hijackings on a weekly basis?

      TV producers should be more responsible.

    • Kyle says:

      09:24am | 23/09/10

      As sad as it is, it’s not the entertainment industry’s responsibility to be morally correct. I understand a lot of young people watch Skins and are influenced by the show. But there are a lot of other games/TV/movies that are worse.

      Mental illness is definitely a subject that needs better understanding but it shouldn’t come down to entertainment media. Perhaps the NEWS media should be covering a lot more.

    • stephen says:

      09:52am | 23/09/10

      I imagine kids see this stuff and think ...‘now I know why I feel sorry for myself’. Or this is what the producers want, cause I know a lot of youth (some angry, some not), and they don’t bother with these shows.
      (Some parents do though, coz they can hold hands and feel sorry for themselves).
      Modern reality entertainment depicting the miserable ‘human condition’ is a fraud. It’s a variation of Tolstoy’s….....’.but all unhappy people are unhappy in their own way’... and the specificities of pain and anger in the characters are supposed to give such feelings a common representation. Such feelings can be realistic (very easy to do), yet any resolutions are fake.(they’re much harder to do). These shows give us a response, and that response is circular : pity, sorrow, abjectness, but no release. That one character may finally fall in love, we know from real life, is not enough.
      Why would any sensible person allow themselves to be so manipulated, emotionally, when there is no payback, not for us, or anyone ?

    • hot tub political machine says:

      09:52am | 23/09/10

      Can I just quietly suggest that portraying adults breaching the trust of teenagers is not so irresponsible as the author suggests. If you ever have the fortune to work with teens in mental health, you might find that you have to really prove yourself before they trust you. Not surprising considering how badly adults treat children and teens in western countries. For goodness sake, yes seek treatment – but its not too terrible thing if a teen makes an adult prove their worthiness before they give their trust.

    • AJ says:

      10:22am | 23/09/10

      Go Cook!

      Given the fact that Skins treats any number of subject matters in an unrealistic manner, I can’t say I was looking to the show to provide an in-depth and accurate portrayal of mental health issues (both the suffering and the treatment).

      I guess we’ll have to wait and see whether any of the second generation appear in the upcoming movie before we know how everything turned out for everyone. I was happy enough that Naomi and Emily finally got their act together - they were the most likeable individual couples and my favourite “ship”.

    • Scruffs says:

      10:25am | 23/09/10

      Why do television shows, movies, games etc. need to send a message? It’s just entertainment. If your life is so influenced by the media you consume that’s your problem. People like you assume the rest of the population is so feeble they’re unable to make the distinction - it’s a sign of arrogance.

      PS - you should have put a spoiler alert on this article. Thanks for that.

    • Vicki PS says:

      01:10pm | 23/09/10

      The point about lack of realistic depictions of mental health professionals is well taken, but in reality, in Australia at any rate, the chance of getting help for a mental health problem (whether young or old) is precisely 50/50.  If you have top level health cover, yes: if not, no.  Public mental health services have solved the problem of strained resources by rigorous gatekeeping.  No-one gets in.  (P.S.  It’s only a TV show, and who really cares about the self-obsessed angst of a bunch of obnoxious Gen-Zedders anyway)?

    • Richard says:

      02:02pm | 23/09/10

      People are also probably worried about the message the Barney Stinson sends to single guys on ‘How I Met Your Mother’, but that doesn’t stop him from being AWESOME.

    • Leez says:

      02:36pm | 23/09/10

      Best comment ever, online-five on that one.
      Regarding the article I think it is a fair comment on Skins, but mostly broadcasters that scare away impressionable young people from help that might be vital to them.

    • bella starkey says:

      03:33pm | 23/09/10

      I think the major problem with skins is the feeling of inadequacy you get from it.

      I watch and think “Why wasn’t i that cool when i was 17?” “how do these kids afford all these drugs when none of them have jobs?” and “How did that kid from about a boy grow up so quickly? am I actually this fkn old now?”

    • Nate says:

      04:26pm | 23/09/10

      Oh my god, come on, it is just television! Stop taking it so seriously. Some other things you might want to complain about - if SpongeBob is a Sponge… how can he talk? And if he can talk, how could he possibly live under the sea? Isn’t this setting children up for disapointment when they go deep sea diving and find Sponges don’t actually live there and if they did they wouldn’t talk.
      Or how about Home and Away… apart from that one time when they had a mudslide, it never rains there. Isn’t that a false advertisement to tourists that it never rains on Sydney’s beaches?
      Honestly.
      If you are thinking that hard about TV, you should probably just watch documentaries… although you will probably find something to whinge about there as well.

    • CollaroyAL says:

      05:08pm | 23/09/10

      Have still been watching Skins, more out of habit than anything else. I have to say that the show has really dipped in quality in last two series - the characters are just so one dimensional and ordinary. Cook is the most unpleasant dick out there and most things what happen there are just so impossible to believe. This is not a real life, by any means.

    • Jason says:

      05:32pm | 23/09/10

      By saying the show is a misrepresentation of reality, the article seems to suggest that no young person has ever been done wrong by a mental health practitioner.  And that no psychologist has abused their power.  Or best of all - that mental health professionals are somehow immune to mental health problems themselves.  I find this very hard to believe and so does the case law.

    • Kelly says:

      05:33pm | 23/09/10

      As a 22 year old sufferer of mental health issues (depression, anxiety, and my own Effy-like breakdown moment some twelve months ago) I watched the Skins finale with a sense of camaraderie with Effy. The things I related to: Effy feeling hopeless and like her mind was under seige, and Freddie, someone who loves her, being powerless to fix her, even though he keeps trying. It’s pretty brilliant television and something with more depth to it than ‘This person is mental because they’re on ice’ which is pretty much the only mental health narrative that gets played out in prime time at the moment.

      As somebody who has seen a psychologist or three, the psychologist that Effy is taken to is somebody who is unbelievable. That’s okay too. This particular storyline isn’t about him. It’s about the cycle of mental health.

      In earlier Skins episodes Cassie is taken to a mental health residence and later, JJ is shown visiting a psychiatrist who pumps him full of medication. Mental health is a huge issue for people my age and its prevalence in Skins is on trend.

      Here’s the thing about mental health professionals - some of them are crap. Some of them are scary, some of them you should steer clear of. Finding somebody you can trust who seems to know what they’re talking about is half the battle. Portrayal of ambiguous mental health professionals in a show like Skins is brilliant. It says, ‘It’s ok to see a counsellor/psychologist like Effy, JJ, Cassie’ and ‘I should be on my guard until I find someone I can trust’. Pretty solid.

    • Jess says:

      06:17pm | 23/09/10

      Skins has definitely got under the skin of many! Thanks for this great article which has created debate and discussion on important issues . In terms of stereotypical mental health profesionals I like the treatment in the united states if Tara where one of her alters plays the role of her own psychiatrist!

    • Marcus says:

      06:17pm | 02/10/10

      um… spoiler alert??? thanks a lot jerk.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

RT @rdhinds: David Warner out for 2 in 5 balls. Now that's a real days work @malcolmconn and @crashcraddock1! #unrealopeners

Anthony Sharwood

Footy Show apologises for 20 years of irrelevant, boofheadish drivel... in our dreams. But the baby apol is a start http://t.co/oaDfGDMJBh

Malcolm Farr

@katedoak Love the 'gay click' reference. Sadly my comment wasn't good enough to be recorded.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @newscomauHQ: Blackberry. Levis. Sony. @sarahmichael24 reports why brands are cool one minute, and cold the next. | http://t.co/3KJHXkVG

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter