Like a distant fog-horn through the acrid smoke of political battle, an early English wicket in the first Ashes Test on Thursday morning echoed across the divide between real life and politics: Summer’s here!

Yay - there's only one more sitting day for the House of Reps! Picture: AFP

By late afternoon, as the scheduled end of the parliamentary year came and went, and politicians huffed with even more indignation than normal, the origin of that fog-horn, let’s call it the ``life’’ side, upped the ante, perhaps aware its initial message had not been heeded.

What happened next, one of the genuinely golden moments in Australian sport, made for a stunning contrast on Capital Hill.

Journalists, political staffers, security officers, frankly anyone near a TV in Parliament House fumbled with the remote switching away from proceedings in the Senate, where the Government’s structural separation of Telstra bill remained bogged, to the cricket.

Peter Siddle’s outstanding hat-trick, half of a memorable ``six-for’’ in an all-round brilliant day’s play, sounded a reality-checking fog-horn, this time so loud it was audible even in Canberra’s hermetically sealed political bubble: ``Stop already!’’ it bellowed. ``Enough is enough you fools, the cricket’s on, nobody cares!’‘

Mind you, not everyone switched across. In one of those bizarre coincidences, some journalists were at that very moment trapped in Parliament’s window-less ``Blue Room’’ attending a Stephen Conroy press conference on, wait for it, how to ensure ordinary Australians had free access to `iconic’’ sporting telecasts such as test cricket.

But that’s another story.
The fact that parliamentary sittings have failed to wind up when scheduled on Thursday (and will now have to return on Monday) should not surprise us really. It has been that kind of a year. A year when protracted arguments, like those on asylum seekers and resource super profits taxes and national broadband networks, went on and on. A year when a long foreshadowed election came and went offering no closure, just more uncertainty.

Yet in hindsight, it has also shown the system to be surprisingly robust.
For all the dire predictions of unworkability and of a shaky, minority government never more than a by-election or two away from defeat, the Gillard operation has generally found a way.

It was a point well made during the final question time of 2010 by the Government’s invariably punchy manager of business in the Reps, Anthony Albanese.

``When the 43rd Parliament was formed some were critical about how effectively we could govern,’’ he told the House.
``Well, after five weeks of sittings we can say that this Government has shown that the 43rd Parliament is able to get legislation through and is able to function in the national interest.’‘

Among the 51 pieces of legislation processed, Mr Albanese picked out key bills relating to the National Health and Hospitals Network, the National Broadband Network, higher education, and child care reforms.

``Indeed, the Government has not lost a single vote on legislation nor has a single amendment been passed to its legislation on the floor of this House _ a remarkable achievement and a fact,’’ he said.

``This is a parliament that is functioning and passing our legislation.’‘
Mr Albanese’s assertiveness betrays two things: a gathering confidence within the new Government that it has what it takes, and an accompanying sense of injustice that it is not been recognised as such. A theme is now apparent that senior Labor figures believe they have been getting bad press, that Labor was unfairly treated in the election campaign, and that Tony Abbott scored an easier ride because expectations of him had started out much lower.

On several occasions in recent weeks, Julia Gillard has found ways of gently upbraiding the press gallery for what she regards as excessive negativity and cynicism, and for failing to distinguish between real stories and frippery.

It may be valid commentary but it conveniently ignores the fact that governments rely on taxpayer-funded spin machinery dedicated to selling government messages, routinely attaching the same weight to fact and fiction, and which lack even the pretence of objectivity.

After a scratchy campaign, and a shaky start, the Government heads into the summer break in better shape than many within its ranks thought likely just weeks ago.

Gillard herself is increasingly convinced she has Tony Abbott’s measure. This week, after progressively turning up the wick since returning from international meetings, she believes she stung him on a couple of key occasions. Time and again in parliament, she honed in on his approach as unerringly negative, directing a warning over Abbott’s head to the Liberal party-room that their leaders’ `total politics’ style of absolute opposition will be simply unsustainable over a three year term. Some know it is true.

There’s no doubt Julia Gillard is learning on the job. Any new PM would be. But she is also growing in the job - becoming more accustomed to its pace, its demands, and its opportunities.

Next year, she told press gallery journalists at her Christmas drinks, there will be plenty of big stories around but less of the other kind.

That’s as may be. But for now, Australians are turning their minds to more pleasant realities: long hot days; summer salads; and the knowledge that the only politician they’ll hear from will be making the odd guest appearance in the commentary box at the cricket.

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • persephone says:

      06:07am | 27/11/10

      Gillard upbraids the gallery for focussing on frippery…and what does this article do?

      You would think, from the above, that the argument in the Senate was a trivial matter, a sideshow purely to indulge politicians’ egos, and nothing of any import to the real world.

      Instead, it was about the structural separation of Telstra, one of the Holy Grails of communication policy for over a decade and a forerunner to the full implementation of the NBN - the biggest infrastrucuture project in Australia.

      Interesting that no articles posted on this blog have focussed on this, just as there has been virtually nothing on the Victorian election.

      Interesting that there is no mention of Asa Waldquist’s claims about journalists being censored by their editors, either.

      Despite rantings on these blogs, Australia’s media is relentlessly anti Labor. Part of this is because the NBN threatens the interests of one of the world’s biggest newspaper owners….and Asa Waldquist’s previous employer.

      The dismissal of yesterday’s events in the Senate (and if the media were turning off, I know of other people, who are genuinely interested in politics, apparently unlike our political reporters, who turned it on) simply supports what Gillard has been saying - our political journos ignore the important in their pursuit of the trivial.

    • TimB says:

      08:53am | 27/11/10

      Oh god, News Ltd conspiracy theories? Really? I thought you were better than that Perse.

    • Richard says:

      11:39am | 27/11/10

      This article is so right: time to give it a rest Persephone. The Christmas truce has been called and the trench warfare has been put on hold. And like WW1, this war has also been ground out to a stalemate.

      But just to get in one parting observation, I don’t think its accurate that “Australia’s media is relentlessly anti Labor”. Of course Gillard thinks that the media doesn’t focus on the “real” issues. According to Gillard, the “real” issue from the election campaign that the media missed was the coalition’s alleged “$11 Billion Black Hole” in their costings. Nevermind the fact that Labor had a $12 Billion Black Hole (and growing) in their mining tax estimates.

      Of course Gillard thought that only the coalition’s alleged inaccuracy deserved media scrutiny, but her own Treasurer’s miscalculations should be accepted on good faith at face value. Of course Gillard thinks that the media didn’t focus enough on the “real issue” of Abbott travelling to Afghanistan a few days after her instead of at the same time as her. Of course Gillard didn’t think the media pursued Abbot hard enough over whether or not he supported Hockey’s 9-point plan. You would expect her to think that the opposition should be scrutinised harder than the government.

      But it shouldn’t. The price the government must pay for having power is to be held accountable and be subjected to great scrutiny. When the government stuffs up, its the media’s responsibility to report it and bring it to light, and Gillard has no right to complain when the media does do their job, even if it makes her job harder.

    • Rocket Surgeon says:

      06:39pm | 27/11/10

      It’s not conspiracy theories, it’s a recognition of of the use of one News property to protect the interests of another. The Telegraph’s current crusade is to prevent Greg Inglis joining Souths at the expanse of the News owned Broncos. The Australian’s is to stop the NBN because it will hurt Foxtel. The Telegraph did everything it could to play down the Storm salary cap breach.

      I don’t have a problem with News using its outlets in this way but denying it happens is just burying your head in the sand.

    • stephen says:

      07:47pm | 27/11/10

      The NBN should be privately run.
      That’s it.
      In which case it should be costed at 25 billion and will be run on time and on budget.

    • TimB says:

      09:36am | 28/11/10

      @ Rocket Surgeon

      Proof please. Because as far as I’m concerned you’re making stuff up. The very definition of conspiracy theories.

      And more to the point on Persephone’s laughable “anti-Labor” rubbish, how does one explain the News Ltd papers that endorsed Labor at the recent Federal election?

      The Sunday Telegraph, The Adelaide Advertiser, The Sunday Mail, The Sunday Herald Sun, The Hobart Mercury & the NT News.

      But why go back to the Federal election? Perse bemoans the lack of coverage of the Victorian election, so lets see what News Ltd papers endorsed Labor for that…

      The Herald Sun, The Sunday Herald Sun & The Australian.

      I repeat once more. News Ltd conspiracy theories are garbage. Anyone who has to rely on them to explain why their opinions aren’t being agreed with is pretty desperate and lacking a coherent argument.

    • persephone says:

      06:25am | 29/11/10

      TimB

      actually, what you describe is a well worn game, played by the media for years: slam a party in articles leading up to the election, then ‘endorse’ them in editorials (which have exactly what effect?).

      It allows the paper to then do just what you’re doing here, and offer this as proof as lack of bias.

      Anyway, I find it interesting that, of all the matters raised in my post, the daring suggestion that perhaps the media isn’t pro Labor is the one which gets the most attention - seems I’ve hit a nerve there.

      Oh, and just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you!!

      Richard

      you may not have noticed, but Parliament is still sitting.

      As for a Christmas truce, Tony Abbott has instructed his members that there is to be no such thing, and that his Shadow Ministry are to maintain the attack over the holiday period.

      Take the issue up with him.

      No one has any trouble with the media reporting issues correctly. It’s the way they blatantly ignore gaffes by Abbott which would have cost any one else their head that gets up my nose….let alone Julie Bishop’s, Andrew Robb’s and Joe Hockey’s.

      Stephen

      the private sector have been given plenty of time to put in place something like the NBN. The result is totally predictable: adequate broadband in highly populated areas, crap elsewhere.

      And regardless, relying on private companies to put in essential infrastructure has always proved to be inadequate - it results in unnecessary duplication in some areas and no service at all in others.

      Once its built, and this problem is avoided, yes, there is an argument to put it into private hands.

    • TimB says:

      07:22am | 29/11/10

      @ Persephone, so they will slam “a party” in the lead-up to the election….but only the Labor party right? They’d never criticise the Liberals. Not at all.
      And any criticism that does get through must surely be a brilliant Machiavellian plot designed to eliminate perception of bias, thus fooling the ignorant masses.
      But not you Persephone. Oh no, you’re much too smart to fall for that. Only you alone can see the truth the rest of us so blindly ignore.

      Please.

      As to you “striking a nerve”, no not really. I took your entire post as an attack on the media for not favourably reporting on what *you* saw as important, wrapped up as part of the standard “News Ltd is biased” gobbeldygook.
      I didn’t feel there was any other points in there that I could have focused on even if I had wanted to.

      Also what gaffes of Tony’s are they ignoring? Every misspoken word he’s uttered over the last year has been blown utterly out of proportion by the apparently Liberal- biased media.
      Hell, at one point they even had to invent stuff he said just to come up with a story. (Badger is still bleating on about his precious Boatphone)

      I’d love to see the stuff they apparently missed. Feel free to share.

    • persephone says:

      11:34am | 29/11/10

      Tim B

      no, it’s a game that they play with both sides of politics on occasion.

      At the moment, they are playing it with Labor, but yes, they have done the same with the Libs in the past.

      I’m sure you weren’t accusing Howard of conspiracy theories when he claimed the ABC was biased against him.

      Still mystified that the bulk of what I said has been swamped by what I think is a very minor point, but can only assume that everyone agrees with the rest of the post.

    • TimB says:

      12:24pm | 29/11/10

      Can’t say that I did accuse Howard of anything, but to be fair I’ve only really been paying attention to politics for the past 3 or 4 years.

      I should also point out that I personally don’t use the “ABC is biased” argument. It’s intellectually lazy IMO. Arguments should be debated on their merits not simply dismissed because of the source.

    • nosthow says:

      08:37am | 27/11/10

      The new Paradigm Mark has given hope to all losers in Australia per medium of this years No1 loser none other than Tones Abbott. Tones who ran dead last in a 2 horse race, where he had the equivalent of 50m start in a 100m race, stood in front of his fellow losers and had the bald faced cheek to declare himself a winner ! I kid you not folks. “Look a meeee” he said “I am a winner” . Now anyone in Australia who now runs last in a race or fails an exam can point to the example set by Tones and declare themselves also winners ! Oh yes thank you new Paradigm. Of course by now the sloth headed Opposition are now starting to ask the big question of Tones that being “Tones if we are such big winners how come we are sitting on the losers bench fella ?” Tones response so far has been “Errrr ummm errr ummm errr ummmm ” Oh yes Tones the polls toll for thee !

    • TimB says:

      03:25pm | 27/11/10

      Nice to know you think there’s hope for you Nosthow. Stay positive now.

    • Richard says:

      10:30am | 28/11/10

      If it was a horserace, it would have been over more like 3km, not 100m. And over the 3km, Labor was well out in front for more than 2km of it. Abbott was such a good jockey that he forced Labor to switch riders on the home stretch, and when it came to the finish, Abbott did in fact win it by a nose (73-72), only to be dudded out of the prized by a couple of vindictive independents.

      (Incidentally, I noticed last night that my post-federal election prediction that if the 2 rural Independents supported Labor to form government then it would galvanise the National party’s bush vote in future elections and spell an end to rural independent representation has eventuated.)

      Will you please stop posting nonsense now nosthow? The fact that you were “confidently predicting a Brumby victory” in the Victorian election on this site merely two days ago just highlights how much of a fantasy-land you really do live in.

    • CaptainCrunch says:

      10:10am | 27/11/10

      Drunk at 6 am?

      Why are you angry? You got your bloody NBN and Govt monopoly. Be happy.

    • Ryan says:

      10:48am | 27/11/10

      @persephone: “Despite rantings on these blogs, Australia’s media is relentlessly anti Labor.” oh please persephone, pull the other one, they continuously post your propaganda don’t they?

    • Fourth Estate? says:

      02:03pm | 27/11/10

      @ persephone. Are you kidding??  ‘Australia’s media is relentlessly anti Labor’. Are you serious? The majority of the media has always had a left wing bent. Don’t get me started on the mouthpiece of the ALP (otherwise known as the ABC), or that contemptuous left wing rag, the Age. It’s hard to get information from the media that doesn’t have a left wing bias. I’ve never read an article in the Age that wasn’t critical of John Howard, despite the overwhelming public support he received during his term as Prime Minister. As for Kerry O’Brien, let’s just wait to see which safe labor seat he is given as a reward for services to the ALP.

    • persephone says:

      06:59am | 29/11/10

      The ABC starts almost every Federal politics piece with “The Opposition claims….” and clearly draws most of its stories from ‘The Australian’, as even a superficial comparison of articles in one and stories in the other demonstrates.

      I am charmed by the irony of people who claim the media is anti Liberal accusing me of conspiracy theories when I claim the opposite.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      03:26pm | 27/11/10

      I’m just pissed off that the taxpayer has to pay for an extra day of the circus that passes as the Australian Federal Parliament. Thank You Liberal Party for wasting my taxes…..

    • MarK says:

      10:04am | 28/11/10

      Or…...

      Labor could have released the document 2 weeks earlier so everyone could actually make an informed decision on what they were voting on.

      Hmmmmmmmmmm

      Thinking is hard

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      03:44pm | 28/11/10

      Probably for you it is hard and novel experience….

    • nosthow says:

      05:00pm | 28/11/10

      @Shane From Melbourne - well said Shane. Sadly all the Libs know how to do it BLOCK ! Johnny Howard spent 12 years in power and only introduced a new tax - the GST. Its been left to Labor to provide Australia with much needed infrastructure. Ms Gillard has said the next 10 years will be infrastructure years. By about 2025 the Libs if still around by then may have woken up to the needs of their electorate and may - just may - even actually win an election - but I am drawing a long bow there Shane arnt I ? hahahahhhhhhhhh

    • iansand says:

      06:55pm | 27/11/10

      Abbott had 6 months, maybe 9, to show that Labor could not govern so as to justify another election.  June next year at the outside.  So far he has failed.

      The Liberals’ long term problem is that there seems to be no sign of Plan B.  The longer this goes on the more apt the Wrecker label will appear to be.  If Abbott cannot pull the rabbit out of the hat by June he is gorn.

    • nosthow says:

      10:15pm | 27/11/10

      Looks like after a mammoth 11 years with a Labor government we may be headed for a hung parliament there. Ted Baillieu of the Liberal Party , just like his Federal counterpart Tony Abbott, has failed to win outright. The Labor party after 11 years in power should have been an easy target for the Libs but once again they have bombed bigtime ! Poor result Teddy old fella - you couldnt even beat a tired 11yo Labor govt !

    • TimB says:

      09:47am | 28/11/10

      nosthow says:08:42am | 26/11/10

      Labor to romp home in Victoria Macca ! Nosthows “surefire winner” prediction !


      I know you do this because for some inexplicable reason you get kicks out of being a pretending to be an utter moron. But honestly, how do you live with yourself? Do you have any sense of shame? At all?

      How does one simply brush off the fact that they constantly contradict themselves?

    • MarK says:

      10:00am | 28/11/10

      Do not feed the trolls

    • Aitch B says:

      10:17am | 28/11/10

      @nosthow

      Here’s what you said on Friday:

      “Labor to romp home in Victoria Macca ! Nosthows “surefire winner” prediction ! “

      Make up your mind, mate….. you can’t have it both ways - as you have endlessly tried to do with the federal election result. What will your comment be if Baillieu does get in? Something like “Poor result - Baillieu should have won by 20 seats” I would imagine.

      Your constant anti-Abbot and anti-Lib/NP rubbish shows nothing other than the fact that you are a rusted on, die hard, blinkered Labor stooge.

      Your credibilty meter remains static at zero…...

    • Richard says:

      10:38am | 28/11/10

      Clutching at straws nosthow, pre-polling votes and postal votes ALWAYS support the coalition by a significant margin. Bentleigh will fall, no hung-parliament for you to bleat about.

      Oh, and nosthow: I warned everyone 2 days ago that you would be doing this. Do you still want to embarrass yourself by persisting in this nonsense?

    • Aitch B says:

      07:49pm | 28/11/10

      I see that nosthow has the intestinal fortitude to respond to a comment by Shane of Melbourne above but not here.

      True colours perhaps?

    • nosthow says:

      08:03pm | 28/11/10

      @TimB - no shame at all Timmy - why would I - am rich and handsome, love the honeys and they love nosthow so I have it all. Must take you out on my powerboat one day to show you what being a winner is all about fella !

    • TimB says:

      07:36am | 29/11/10

      Say what you will about Nosthow, he clearly has a good imagination for fantasy.

      You should write a novel. Give Rowling a run for her money.

    • MarK says:

      11:24pm | 27/11/10

      Just finished watching/listening to the Victorian election.

      What struck me most was the rejection of the “new paradigm” by Victorians.

      The sitting independent gone - and he had been there since 1999.

      Greens loss of votes.

      Greens expected to win 4 seats - they got none.

      Even though a fluke might be on the cards and a 44 seat result is possible it is clear the electorate wanted a major to govern.

      Sign of things to come now everyone has had time to think about the ramifications of having a fool like Oakeshott call the shots. Or having Labor in government but the Greens in power.

      Very interesting.

      Oh and big Bazza in NSW will now see the excellent advantages of NOT preferencing Greens. Won’t they howl. makes me smile. Tears of the Greens are so refreshing

    • iansand says:

      08:09am | 28/11/10

      When the Libs are in power they claim that the media is anti-Liberal.  When Labor are in power they claim that the media is anti-Labor.

      This is good news for us, because it shows that generally the media are anti-the-government, which is as it should be.

    • Rosie says:

      10:29am | 28/11/10

      Mark good article and yes what a start for the Aussies - hat trick! Lets hope they finish it off with a win! Any win against the Poms spells a great summer for me!

      As for our political scene Julia Gillard and her team are getting away with their ferocious approach in Parliament. I believe it is not a fair playing field as the speaker is always saying; “Order Order” and “sit down” when any of the Libs are mentioning that the answers given to them were not relevent to the questions asked.

      Sledging in cricket should be acceptable, because it only involves 2 players and can easily be fought out on the field and left on the field. To me it is like “ball against bat”

      It shouldn’t be allowed in Parliament when it includes family members

      Recently Julia Gillard with the power she obtained from 2 other politicians thinks she has the right to foolishly tell Tony Abbot that he should take his wife and family for a long holiday, “1 whole year” she added with sarcasm.

      “Attack Tony Abbott as the leader of the Opposition but leave his wife and family out of it.” It is cheeky and disrespectful attacking those that do not have to answer to her in any way shape or form.

      The media, report what they see but may have missed this one because if the shoe was on the other foot and Tony Abbott had given her the same advice “and uttered the word “boyfriend” he would have been in “deep shit.” with the media and Gillard lovers.

    • Richard says:

      10:54pm | 28/11/10

      Let’s get one thing straight, Rudd (along with Stephen Smith, John Faulkner and Lindsay Tanner) are the only individuals connected to the whole ALP movement that emerged edified from the political events of the last four months.

      When Paul Howes says things about Rudd like:
      “I’m trying to work out some way to keep his legacy and memory alive, for years and decades to come as a constant reminder of how one slightly unhinged, vindictive geek from semi-rural Queensland almost destroyed the soul of our great movement and why we should never let his ilk stain the party again”;

      What the real meaning of Howe’s sentiment is: “The type of person that Australians are willing to entrust with their national government is the type of person who is incompatible with the spiteful machinations of the ALP movement.”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter