As a political reporter I haven’t paid too much attention to the Hey Dad sex allegations story but it has been difficult to miss, as it’s dominated much of the news media for the past week.

The Hey Dad story has been big news

Which is why I was surprised Prime Minister Rudd didn’t know about the story when asked if he had heard of it by Neil Mitchell this morning, ‘ah no, sorry I haven’t seen those reports,’ he replied.
This morning, as Kevin Rudd was in the Sunrise studio waiting to go on-air, the 7 o’clock news was broadcast; it’s lead story? The Hey Dad claims. It is possible he was mentally preparing for his upcoming interview and didn’t see or hear the story.

But the Prime Minister’s been aware of much lesser ‘tabloid’ stories before.

On the 22nd of May, 2008, photographer Bill Henson had his Sydney exhibition, featuring images of naked children, shut down.

The next morning, Kevin Rudd appeared on The Today Show and declared them ‘revolting.’  On the 10 June last year, the BBC reported on the Australian Prime Minister calling British chef Gordon Ramsay a ‘new form of low life.’ The Prime Minister’s intervention into his spat with Journalist Tracey Grimshaw was ‘unfortunate,’ Ramsay retorted back.

Kevin Rudd was (rightly) criticised back then for commenting on the tabloid issues; Prime Ministers shouldn’t be armchair news commentators, was the admonishment.

It is advice he has clearly taken. Just over a week ago, while in Brisbane, he was asked about Michael Clarke and Lara Bingle as their relationship publicly broke down. There’s been a lot of talk about it in the news this week, the reporter noted, ‘do you think it’s good for Australian cricket? Are you surprised by what’s happening?’  The Prime Minister sensibly refused the bait, ‘I’m going to leave that to them, I’ve got other priorities called the health and hospital system.’ He didn’t want to comment about it but was still aware of the story.

It is what makes this morning’s claim of not having seen or heard of one report about the Hey Dad claims such a surprise and out of character. If the PM did know about it, surely the best reply to Neil Mitchell’s question would have been ‘yes I have heard about that but it’s a legal matter that I won’t be commenting on.’

If he didn’t know, it shows he isn’t ‘in touch’ with what’s going on out there in the burbs. Of course, he could defend this perception by claiming to be a hardworking Prime Minister focused solely on his health reform plan.

However you could compare that with the Former Prime Minister John Howard, who would stay up late at night to read the first edition newspapers online. In the morning, after his walk, he would make breakfast and then read over the hardcopy second editions.

His wife, Janette, would regularly bring him stories she’d circled in the papers she thought interesting. He wanted to know what was going on in the community even if he wasn’t going to be commenting on much of it.

As Opposition Leader Tony Abbot pointed out later ‘it’s important politicians try to stay in touch, on the other hand there are lots of things which happen in our community, which politicians for all sorts of reasons don’t comment about.’

The Prime Minister’s thoughts on the Hey Dad case are not important but he was probably only asked about it because he’s been so willing to comment on things in the past, which he would have been wiser to shy away from.

It’s certainly no crime for a PM engrossed in his own work not to know about tabloid issues dominating the news media but why then did he care enough to be across them and be so willing to comment before, only to turn off completely from what’s being discussed now?

Most commented

43 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Sherlock says:

      05:21am | 27/03/10

      I personally think he’s doing it right this time although I agree that he shoud have said he just wasn’t going to comment on it.

      Does anyone really care what kevin Rudd or Tony Abbott think about the news? I want to know what they are going to do about health, energy or the economy not if they think Lara Bingle is being treated unfairly.

    • Grumbles says:

      12:07pm | 27/03/10

      So it is better to lie than say no comment? Because no one really believes Kevvie didn’t know.

    • Botfly says:

      06:17am | 27/03/10

      We expect to much out of any PM, we have. If he comments, then some think he shouldn’t, if he says nothing, then hes indifferent. Before during and after being PM, above all hes an Aussie. We all comment to our families about issues, and would comment to the press if we were important enough to ask. So why should any PM not be able to comment if asked. Tony Abbotts comments on his sex life were a turn off, I think comments like that are better left unsaid, but if its in the news already, then its anyones to discuss

    • Morgan says:

      01:59pm | 28/03/10

      The problem is not that we expect too much. As a result of Kevin Rudd’s governance, we’ve come to expect too little. Whether it’s about health reform or the Hey Dad sex allegations, Kevin Rudd speaks, but doesn’t actually say anything - that’s why he is becoming known as Prime Minister Blah Blah.

    • persephone says:

      07:03pm | 28/03/10

      Morgan, the Libs tried to get that moniker to stick but gave up after about two days.

      It’s OK, though, if Labor lowers expectations too much, it will make it easier for Tony.

    • Old Bert says:

      07:27am | 27/03/10

      Both of today’s ‘leaders’ would have fitted nicely into the past LEAVE IT TO THE GIRLS, a 9 Network panel based show featuring a team of ladies attempting to solve viewers problems. Based on a radio show of the name and hosted by Terry Dear, with Margo Lee and Elizabeth Riddell.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:01am | 27/03/10

      So Rudd wont go tabloid when you want him to?
      What was Abbotts and Bob Browns take on this allegation?
      Does the accused have any rights, ? why would you, Latika want to encourage public speculation about the matter?
      If as you point out, the PMs reaction to Ramsay etc was
      “(Rightly) criticised” then why are you now whingeing that he wont do the same?
      Have you ever stopped to consider why so many hold the “press” in such contempt?
      To paraphrase HG and Roy,- a trip to the room of mirrors may help.

    • Grumbles says:

      12:20pm | 27/03/10

      Did you read the article? The point was Kevin could have said “no comment” instead he said I didn’t hear about it. It was front page news and Kevin hadn’t heard or so he claimed. One of two things either 1) he is a liar or 2) he is so single minded on flawed health reform that he has forgotten there are other problems with the country and that he needs to be accross all portfolios only the health minister should be single minded on health. Either way it’s pretty bad for him, my guess is that given past performance he lied without even thinking about it.

      So to sum it up. Rudd Lied. Pollies shouldn’t comment on tabloid issues but they should be aware of them.

    • Dan says:

      07:06pm | 27/03/10

      Grumbles, how is this Hey Dad thing a problem with the country? It’s irrelevent and it has nothing to do with any portfolio!

    • Andy says:

      08:08am | 27/03/10

      Are you trying to say that Rudd with a wife and kids and a truck load of media advisers doesn’t know what the news headlines of the day or evening are? Yeh right.

    • preciouspress says:

      08:14am | 27/03/10

      And the point is?
      Damned if you do and second guessed if you don’t.

    • Aussie Bob says:

      08:41am | 27/03/10

      Yeah Latika I find it hard to believe he wasn’t at all aware of the issue. I think that he really would not have wanted to comment on it to as it could distract from his key message of the day as well as being a sensitive issue which is understandable enough but to then just plead complete ignorance to the entire story is not believable from my perspective.

    • Ed Brown says:

      08:48am | 27/03/10

      I for one am glad he’s stopped commenting on unimportant tabloid stories. The Chaser’s Realistic Wish, the Bill Henson photos, the Matthew John sex scandal - it’s always frustrated me that the person running the country sees fit to rant about the trivial.

    • janeylong says:

      08:46am | 27/03/10

      what…...? is that a story?

    • Greg says:

      08:46am | 27/03/10

      Howard only got across the trivial issues so he could beat them up into something political - and the media fell for it, like a mob of unquestioning fools. Your reportage of Howard’s late night and morning rituals like they are something to be commended shows just how easily played you are.

      If Rudd is not doing that anymore I say excellent, let’s hope this puts an end to radio talk back hosts and journalists asking politicians about irrelevant crap.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:55am | 27/03/10

      Rudd has become complacent , feels he need not cover the day to day tabloid concerns. What you are seeing is a Prime Minister smugly believing that he has done enough to covince the electorate that he has his finger on the electoral pulse.  Maybe he should lose some of that smugness , the electoral pulse has been known to ” flat-line ” in the past.

    • Mike says:

      09:06am | 27/03/10

      Kevin rudd is a puppet controlled by the media.

    • persephone says:

      12:29pm | 28/03/10

      Well, obviously if he was, he’d have known the answer to the question.

    • Julia says:

      09:31am | 27/03/10

      I’ve seen the promos on ACA and a bit of scuttlebutt here and there, but I don’t know the full story either.

      But I still don’t like Kevin Rudd.

    • John A Neve says:

      09:56am | 27/03/10

      Latika,

      Has answered her own question, the PM has learnt from his mistakes. Why would a PM comment on trivia?
      Who is interested in events that may or may not have occured some years ago. I for one am more interested in what is happening now.
      Based on what little I know about the claims, the police don’t seem very interested either.

    • Bruce says:

      10:37am | 27/03/10

      John: Agree, Is this show biz story high on a PM business, would not think so. Particularly making comment about trial by media.

    • Grumbles says:

      12:23pm | 27/03/10

      He should have said “no comment” instead he chose to lie. what does that say about him?

    • Michael says:

      09:58am | 27/03/10

      It isn’t a “legal matter” yet. It’s Current Affair ratings chasing. As a “political reporter” you might consider having a little think about the bigger issues confronting our government. Thank you, however, for sharing your intimate knowledge of the Howards’ Kirribilli breakfast table with us, but I’d prefer to think our Prime Ministers have more on their plate than using tabloid press commentary as a bridge to the wider electorate.

    • A Bob says:

      10:30am | 27/03/10

      I know squat about Bingle or any of the other real life Desperate Housewives dramas the media uses to fill the space between soundbites. As soon as I see a headline about such things I avert my gaze and look for something else to read. It’s saving me a lot of time; I can scan the home page of news.com.au and close the browser window within seconds these days.

      Looks like now I’ll have to avoid anything with your name on it. Your only other contribution to the Punch is a story about Turnbull tweeting. And you call yourself a political reporter? I guess that’s why the Bulletin closed down, it couldn’t compete with New Idea.

    • Peter H says:

      10:40am | 27/03/10

      Who cares whether the PM comments on this or not.  It could subjudice so he should really make no comment.

      In regard to Mr Howard and his wife scanning the papers you will find that his former Chief of Staff, Arthur Sinodinos, said that Mr Howard and Janette spent 2/3rds of every day scanning the media, with Mrs Howard ringing up; to 10 times a day to speak to John Howard.

      I would have preferred it if Mr Howard had paid that much attention to infrastructure, health, education, etc.  A PM who spent 2/3rds of every day being a media bunny!! It’s no wonder the media were so sycophantic and never questioned his lack of attention to his primary job.

      Good on Rudd for deciding to give the tabloid stuff a gigantic miss.  Most of us do anyway.  Juvenile reporting at its worst.

    • mickey says:

      10:43am | 27/03/10

      here’s another question:

      who cares?

      i keep seeing ads for ACA about the Hey Dad thing but I still have no idea what it’s about nor do I care that much and no I won’t find out, and last I checked I wasn’t running a country and had more important things to worry about.

      It’s only a little bit retarded.

    • Dee says:

      11:05am | 27/03/10

      More important is Rudd wont comment on what an incompetent man he has placed in the position of Broadband and Communications, and the real reasons behind the censoring of the internet or why the myschool website is such a dud, and why individual schools will have to pay the $50,000 early retiring teachers from the schools funding

    • BTS says:

      12:34pm | 27/03/10

      I don’t think anyone should be commenting on the ‘Hey Dad’ issue, prior to it going to court.  Since when was it acceptable to have a trial by media as we have seen this week?  Does it risk contempt of court?  I hope they have good legal advisers on this, otherwise we may see the trial aborted due to the unprecedented coverage.  How would the victims feel about that?

    • iansand says:

      01:31pm | 27/03/10

      I’ve worked out your problem.  You think the Hey Dad thing is important.

    • Windsmoke. says:

      02:26pm | 27/03/10

      It’s about time Prime Minister Mr Kevin Rudd stopped commenting on tabloid stories and trivia that won’t be around very long anyway and got on with governing the country like he was elected to do by the Australian people.

    • jack of Melbourne says:

      03:38pm | 27/03/10

      My God Latika, I think you have stumbled across a scoop here, imagine the PM not watching ACA, the world is going to hell in a handbasket.
      I am also waiting for his views on the Carlton /Richmond game, after all he has nothing else to do at night.
      Strangely, I havent noticed a comment on this drama from Mr Abbott or Senator Joyce for that matter.

    • persephone says:

      03:59pm | 27/03/10

      You know, Latika, he might just be telling the truth.

      He commented on the others because he knew something about them. He hadn’t heard of this story, so he didn’t.

      Honestly. It happens.

    • S.L says:

      06:25pm | 27/03/10

      I can’t believe “does Kevin Rudd know about the Hey Dad allegations” is a news story! What the hell does he or the Mad Monk or even the tree hugging senator from Tassie and their opinions have to do with the allegations? 
      ACA had these “shocking” allegations on the table for a week before their public spirit forced them to reveal the name of the accused. Wasn’t to build their ordiance up for a week of course! Besides why is this only coming up now after 20 plus years? All I have seen on ACA for the past week are washed up has beens I haven’t thought of in years enjoying a rare moment back on the tube. Is this their chance to get on TV again? Looks like it.
      Before he was named Robert Hughes was touted by those accusing him as being a “very powerfull figure in Australian broadcasting”. So all it takes to be “powerfull” in the local industry is to be an actor in a successful sitcom?

    • Louisa says:

      08:54pm | 27/03/10

      persephone.. is your real name Kev?


      Actually you are a pain in the a…...

    • persephone says:

      06:59pm | 28/03/10

      Then just ignore me, Louisa.

      Brilliant comeback, by the way.

      You’re one classy lady.

    • Serious says:

      09:37pm | 27/03/10

      Does anybody with an IQ over 30 watch the current affairs programs on the commercial stations?

    • TGo says:

      12:22pm | 28/03/10

      I don’t care waht the PM thinks of Hey Dad allegations, the make up of the cricket team, or who he thought really shot JR.

      I want to know why “journalists” are asking political leaders about things that should not be on their radar.

      Why was Julia Gillard asked to comment on Binglegate? Why did she even comment at the time?

      If K Rudd is aked to comment on the allegations that have yet to appear before a court, does that not add to the defence when/if any charge are laid that the alleged perpetrator cannot hope to achieve a fair trial because the entire country - even the PM - already have an opinion on the matter?

      Why isn’t the PM being asked questions like Kerry O’Brien did in the week of the Garret movement - and have answers demanded, rather than take the spin - “PM, why is the sky blue?”, “Well, thanks for that question, I would dispute the fact the sky is blue at all”

      It’s because theya re so afraid he won’t spin to them at all.

    • william says:

      04:10pm | 28/03/10

      Why don’t you just call it as it is! The PM will lie through his teeth if it suits him.
      He has a well documented history of lying and to think we made him our PM.
      Pleased to say I didn’t vote for his party because one can pick a two faced fake a mile off.

    • persephone says:

      07:09pm | 28/03/10

      William, you’ve obviously been in hiding for three years or so.

      It’s OK, you can come out now, Howard isn’t the PM anymore.

    • Bob H says:

      07:29pm | 28/03/10

      They may as well try and get their minds around the trivial stuff as they sure as hell can’t do the big stuff

    • 6c legs says:

      11:17am | 29/03/10

      I’ve read 1 report about the Hey Dad situation, a while ago on Aunty.

      Child sexual abuse *is* something to care about - whether it happened today or 20years ago.
      But, to be trialling the perpetrator or alleged victims via the media (and joe blow on comments sites) isn’t how our legal system works. That is of course if justice *is* to prevail…

      If Mr Howard was so across all issues raised in the papers, then how come he was so indifferent to Forgotten Australians, Child Migrants and the Stolen Generations when society was shocked/angry about what had happened to those individuals?

      At least in a weasly way, you [the author] have revealed your alliances.
      When will you Libs get over the fact that your hero not only lost the PM’ship, but his own seat?

      “Scorned women”  have nothing compared to scorned liberals.

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      12:59pm | 29/03/10

      Little Kevvy wants to micro-manage all of our lives.

    • Heléna says:

      08:31pm | 31/03/10

      he must have taken your post to heart! - given today’s outrage at Robin Williams

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick likewise!

Daniel Piotrowski

Hurray racism is fixed no protesters at anti-Islam demonstration http://t.co/hRFbZq8u9h

ToryShepherd

OI TWITTER! Need your best misheard lyrics pronto for @891adelaide's #thebuzz! Hit me, please!

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick I really meant without me writing any news

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter