Most people can’t resist taking a swing at Ricky Ponting’s captaincy. Ironically, despite my menacing pose in the image below, I am not one of them.

Punter and the author on a photoshoot for Alpha magazine.

That the bloke can bat, nobody denies. But if you buy the negative hype, then every time an opponent strikes the ball through the covers, it’s Punter’s fault because he sets poor fields.

Every time a match peters out to a tame draw, it’s Punter’s conservative declaration that’s to blame.

Whenever 10 overs pass without a wicket, well, clearly that’s because of Ricky’s complete inability to rotate his bowlers intelligently.

As a deal-sealer, Ponting’s army of thoughtful critics like to point out that he is beady-eyed, and hails from the small island state of Tasmania.

Even brilliant scribes like Cricinfo’s expat Aussie deputy editor Alex Brown have set their autopilot to “bag Ricky” mode on a more or less permanent basis. Brown’s lead after day two of the current Test? Ponting’s Batting Makes up for Captaincy.

So, does anyone want to tell me just exactly what Ponting has done wrong captaincy-wise in the current Test?

If you ask me, he pulled off one of the greatest double-bluffs I’ve seen in a long, long time in the dismissal of Kevin Pietersen.

English and Australian commentators alike rubbished Ponting for leaving three fielders in the deep as spinner Nathan Hauritz bowled, arguing he was giving away too many easy singles.

But think about Kevin Pietersen for a moment. He is a man who likes to dominate. A fours and sixes guy. A guy who’d leave the video store empty-handed if the Arnie section was bare.

Captaincy 101 says leave a few fielders in close, and encourage batsmen like KP to hit over the top. If Ponting had done that, it’s a safe bet Pietersen would have smashed Hauritz into the River Taff.

So instead, Ricky teased him. He said, You want to hit fours? Then find a different way to hit ‘em!

And wouldn’t you know, that’s exactly what happened. Pietersen tried to innovate and got caught on an attempted sweep from a metre outside off stump. “Stupid Pietersen,” said the English media. “Brilliant Ricky,” say I.

Look, I’m willing to concede Punter has had his bad days. Like the shocker in India where he let Mike Hussey bowl, sacrificing an outside chance of victory at the altar of over rates.

But for the most part, Ponting’s critics are like music fans who draw a line in the sand when they reach their mid ’30s. The stuff of their youth was good. Everything now and ever after is crap.

If you look at Ponting objectively, he actually combines in one package many of the best attributes of his celebrated predecessors Border, Taylor and Waugh.

His ability to instil belief in fringe players is pure Waugh. Just look at his faith in Andy Symonds at the 2003 World Cup, or the young bowling attack which won this year’s Test series in South Africa.

For sheer hard-arsed bastardry in the Alan Border mould, look no further than Ponting’s scolding of Brett Lee’s casual crowd banter in last week’s Ashes lead-up match, when the England Lions were none-for-plenty.

And for tactical nous which rivals master-strategist Mark Taylor, marvel at Ponting’s decision to bring on part-time trundler Michael Clarke at the death of the infamous “Monkey Gate II” Test in Sydney – a move which snared an incredible victory.

It was after that match that Fairfax’s cricket blusterer-in-chief, Peter Roebuck, urged Ponting to resign.

Resign? I would have asked for more of the same. Ricky may not be perfect, but if I was a current Australia player, I know who I’d rather be Stuck in the Middle with.

18 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Peter Warrington says:

      09:05am | 11/07/09

      Anthony, it’s like transport planning - everyone’s an expert!

      I have long rated Ponting as a good but not great captain. About Greg Chappell/Border level. better than me - I was rubbish.

      He can change that rating with a successful handling of the transitional era - he has a bowling attack as raw (but talented) as Ian Chappell had to shape.

      As for his instilling belief in younger or fringe players, maybe he is a true genius a la your Pietersen riff. all of that time he was saying he needed experienced hands for SA, fast bowling and Hayden, he was really instilling belief in the “young” (26-27) guys they had forced on him.

      either that. or he talks too much to the media and doesn’t think about what he says.

      or is just one of the many revisionists in the Australian cricket fraternity.

      anyway, runs and points on the board.

    • Greensborough Growler says:

      10:18am | 11/07/09

      Ponting also had to negotiate the career ends of some of the greatest players ever. Warne, McGrath, Hayden, Gilchrist would be starters in most “best ever” Australian sides.

      The loss of their talent and experience would have most of his detractors seeking their own early retirement. Ponting has played the cards dealt and his captaincy record stands up very well.

      BTW his 150 in Cardiff has to rate up there with the greatest FU centuries ever to his critics.

    • Peter Hayes says:

      02:17pm | 11/07/09

      I love the Punter !! Peter Roebuck is an ass !!
      If ever there was an Aussie I would be proud of, it is the Punter or Little Lleyton Hewitt !! They stand for what Australia has become known as, a bloody tough little fighter !! C’mon Aussie !!

    • Daniel says:

      02:46pm | 11/07/09

      So true Anthony, our country is full of followers who jump on the first bandwagan that passes. Punter has achieved some fantastic wins post Warne/McGrath. And while we are on Roebuck, what did he ever do to be such an expert…..........that’s right, nothing! Great article, I’d like to see more of it.

    • Mike How says:

      05:30pm | 11/07/09

      I agree with Peter Hayes, Peter Robuck is an arse who did he play cricket with ?????
      Punter has the credentials to change with Mcgrath,Hayden,Langer,Martyn,Warne, Lee,Clarke to just name a few retirees————-“Punter should be knighted”

    • bloke says:

      07:03pm | 11/07/09

      I’d like to hear less of Jeff Thomson’s rantings. When did he turn into Mr. Rent-a-quote? He’s getting as bad as Niki Lauda.

      Seriously gents, there are better ways of getting your names in the papers than just spouting controversial crap each time someone asks a question. You’ve had your time, it’s over. Now move along.

    • realto says:

      09:36pm | 11/07/09

      Ponting intervened to keep a few players in the team when the team would have been better off without them, as they now are. Apart from that, he’s been a very worthy captain and certainly the best equipped player to lead.

    • John of S Perth says:

      11:10pm | 11/07/09

      I agree with your article. Punter is no Mark Taylor or Ian Chappell. But he is as good as S Waugh, Border and Greg Chappell. The way he has taken on the responsibility to lead with his bat and set up games himself is outstanding. His average has increased since being captain. And the way he has embraced taking on the new generation and moulding a team is inspiring.

    • cutter9 says:

      12:07am | 12/07/09

      totaly agree ponting is a master and everyone should get off his back

    • Rich says:

      10:41am | 12/07/09

      Maybe its time to consider what Ponting has achieved in the game as a captain as well as a batsman. I bet no fewer than ALL of the current and past captains of world cricket would have settled for his record.

      Go Punter, go Aussies!

    • Yobbo says:

      04:42pm | 12/07/09

      The reason everyone bags Ponting is because he’s not Shane Warne.

      Warne should have been Australian captain. If he was, he would probably still be playing. That is the great tragedy.

    • regina says:

      10:53pm | 12/07/09

      so why then are you posing in a photo with punter looking like you’re about to wallop him with a cricket bat? was it some creative dingbat’s idea of an interesting or amusing shot? because it’s quite an aggressive pose you know. there’s a touch of homoeroticism as well, i think.

      anyway, i’m just not that into the ashes this time around. it’s not the same without warney.

    • RT says:

      10:03am | 13/07/09

      So are Ponting’s supporters still happy with his captaincy following his strange tactic of giving the ball to innocuous part time bowler Marcus North with time running out to take the last wicket to win a test? It made me wonder. Ponting was thinking more about the clock than how he was going to take that wicket.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      12:24pm | 13/07/09

      I have been a critic of Ponting’s captaincy in the past but I thought he handled the captaincy very well in this match and clearly out-thought Strauss.  Giving Marcus North a run at no. 4 in the 2nd innings against England A last week was a small but good sign that he was thinking about the bigger picture and in general I thought he got things pretty right in the field.  Reports suggest he fell back a little into his “I’ll just throw the ball to Johnson” strategy this morning despite his waywardness while Siddle looked far more dangerous and got the wicket of Collingwood when he finally came on.  Giving North a bowl wasn’t a bad idea as you have to try different things when looking for a breakthrough.  They may have relaxed against the part-timer or he may have been able to get one to zing off a crack in the pitch.  England showed some starch to hang on so well done to them for that, but we certainly gained an early psychological edge going to Lord’s, a ground where we always do well.  Assuming England bring in Harmison, it’ll be very interesting to see how he goes.  He can be anything from luxury ocean liner to Cleveland steamer.

      As for Peter Roebuck, he has the right to his opinion just like everyone else.  if you don’t like it or agree with it that’s ok, but he is paid to write opinion pieces.  Sometimes I think he makes a good point and other times he does go on a bit while occasionally it’s a little of both.  Who he has played with or where he’s from is irrelevant though and doesn’t preclude him from commenting, just like those of us posting here.

    • Bill Bentleigh says:

      12:50pm | 13/07/09

      Thanks Ricky for handing the Poms a draw. When you played on to 674, were you too gutless to declare at 500, or were you after a few more batting records for the team?

    • yeebarr says:

      06:04pm | 13/07/09

      Ouch. One wicket is the difference between genius and moron!

      Not a big fan of Ponting’s captaincy but even I didn’t think it was that bad (can only work with what you’ve got).

      People are annoyed we didn’t get that last wicket - I was surprised we even got the other 9! Big picture: poor cricket by England - Australia are one step closer to retaining the Ashes.

    • MarK says:

      07:50pm | 13/07/09

      I have been, and still am a couch critic of his captaincy, Hindsight is one thing but the mind boggles. Why not Give Hilf a second slip, Why take Hilf out just after he took the 8th wicket and not bring him back at all, I mean its not like he is the only bowler who has been getting the ball to swing… oh wait, Surely he could have gotten 1 over at least

    • Rob says:

      04:53pm | 15/07/09

      Punter is as bad a captain as he is a great batsman.  Nothing wrong with his declaration, the scoring was done at a fair clip and a good target set.

      Where he came unstuck is where he usually does - unnecessarily defensive fields (deep backward point for far too long this time round is one example), limited options if plan A doesn’t work, failure to stick to a plan to give it time to work (T20 mentality perhaps) and failure to improvise and instill a sense of urgency.

      I have no problem with Ricky if a bowler gets spanked through the covers, that’s just bad bowling and the bowler is responsible.  But if Ricky keeps bowling Johnston when he’s struggling to even hit the pitch, if he brings on Marcus “nude ball” North when we need the last wicket when he hasn’t given him any time to settle beforehand, if he underbowls the best bowler in the particular match (Hilfenhaus), if he doesn’t take the game by the scruff of the neck and have his fielders charging in, if he takes forever to consult and set his fields, then YES, Ricky is under performing as a captain.

      Last Ashes series he was new to the role and, whilst I believe his captaincy was a major reason we lost, he is entitled to time to learn the ropes.  Problem is he hasn’t. 

      Ricky needs to work with the coach and perhaps even engage Warne as a strategy development officer for planning against each batsman.  There were some good signs - leg slip, short mid ons and offs at various times, but he is too easily put off his plans if a few runs are hit.  We needed to get the Poms out on a relatively benign pitch, once they were 5/70 who cares if the tail smashes 6 runs an over and builds a lead of 50-100 by tea provided they are all out courtesy of immense pressure from attacking fields - assuming they aren’t dismissed earlier as they take risks to score that is.

      Ricky went soft when he needed to be hard, that’s what cost us this game, the last UK Ashes campaign and several games in between.

      Equally Clarke isn’t yet ready, Hussey is out of form so who do you choose as a replacement?

      The ACB need to ensure the coach steps up and Warne as master strategist is brought in.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter