I voted for the first time this election. Willing to be a swinging voter in return for a competent government, I should have been the perfect target for a campaigning politician.

Picture: Getty Images.

Yet the major parties do a better job at alienating youth than including us.

The incapacity to decipher anything politicians say or mean is alienating to youth who prefer a quick sound bite that is straight to the point. For voters of every age, accessing information more substantial than if the ‘real’ Julia or Tony is out today or who has better suited ears for Prime Ministership was hard this election.

After this weekend no one can doubt Australia’s frustration with such a shallow campaign.

The results don’t point to a huge swing against Labor or a huge swing to the Coalition. There was a 1.9% swing to the Coalition, but to put that into perspective, the informal vote is at 1.7%. There was no significant lurch to the right, as most of the votes Labor lost went to the Greens.

The only recognisable swing was to boycott the major parties in favour of minor ones.

Living in the Labor stronghold of Chisholm in Victoria did put a bit of a damper on my first vote. Chances were the seat was going to remain stable no matter who I voted for, so I felt disenfranchised in that sense, like my opinions didn’t matter.

Yet for many of my friends living in the seat of Melbourne, their vote has been noticed nationally, with a 10.2% swing to the Greens and the first ever Greens MP. 

Melbournians set their agenda throughout the campaign, focusing on climate change, global poverty, human rights and refugees. With 9337 donors to Oxfam from this electorate alone, Executive Director of Oxfam Andrew Hewitt described Melbourne voters as having a humanitarian conscience.

It was Adam Bandt’s public advocacy for stronger leadership on climate change at many local forums that sealed the deal for Melbourne voters, and in particular young voters.

I was surprised by his honesty. He is the first Greens member I’ve heard to actually explain why the Greens turned down the ETS in the first place.

“The ETS locked in a low target (5%) for a long amount of time, and future governments wouldn’t have been able to change it…we need to cut emissions by 40% by 2020.”

Clear and simple.

Yet I fear that for most politicians climate change has become one of those problems too immense to deal with. There’s just too much effort involved, put it on the ‘too hard’ pile. After all, they won’t live to see the consequences, we will.

However, with the Greens set to hold the balance of power in the Senate next July, there is hope that there will be enough momentum to shift the agenda away from major party lines to more substantial action.

For those of you who think that youth are apathetic, it is usually because we feel disillusioned and excluded. Our opinions don’t matter; our vote isn’t worth being persuaded. So why bother?

Despite these odds we want to turn alienation into action.

A hung parliament may actually be just what Australia needs to act on youth concerns. With governments created by negotiation, our concerns are better represented and better listened to. No longer can governments, political parties and local members be complacent about our opinions because each vote will become more precious than ever.

It might just set a new precedent that reflects what democracy truly is. Of the people, by the people, for the people.

As the only developed nation that avoided recession, we are sick of being told we can’t afford what is essential for our future. We want to create a better Australia that gives the best possible life to all its citizens. We are the leaders of tomorrow and our voices deserve to be taken seriously.

Youth are more politically aware than most people think. But if you want us to really get involved in the political process you have to take into account the future.

Not one election cycle. Not the next three years.

If our vote really matters to you look to the next twenty years. I can guarantee you will have my vote.

72 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:42am | 27/08/10

      I used to think much the same way ... when I was young.

      The problem with young people assuming they’re going to change everything, is that they grow up. Then they get to watch as the next generation makes all the same naive mistakes that they did.

    • Trev_Northbridge says:

      09:28am | 27/08/10

      The problem with old people (I’m 38) so stick me in whichever category fits) is that most of is become seflish with age. Instead of hoping to change the world we all start to focus on what we want for ourselves and our own families. Good intentions of course. But without looking at the bigger picture we fail to do anything grand or with any sense of vision. This isn’t just a political thing, we do it in all facets of our lives. We think that by working longer hours, paying off the mortgage, buying a second or third property we are setting up our kids for a stable future. All we really do when we do that is get too busy to be a part of their lives in the hear and now.  Politically older people (anyone over 25) are voting more and more based around how it effects their mortgage or their own lives, only the young vote for idealistic and national or even international goals. I just wish they didn’t grow up into grumpy selfish older men and women.

    • Sue says:

      10:53am | 27/08/10

      I’m nearly 50 and about to install solar power on my home…with long term benefits in mind for both our family and the environment.  I dont believe the man-made climate change crap - but I do believe in climate change and the need for policies to suit.  Lets hope the young people of Australia actually read all the policies of parties such as The Greens before giving their support - because they are economic vandals who will ruin everyone’s life with their EXTREME left proposals!

    • hot tub political machine says:

      01:29pm | 27/08/10

      If a middle aged person and a teenager have a duty to perform and it goes horrible wrong, who would you hold responsible what happens – the adult or the teen?

      If we end up with some silly people in power on the back of young votes, who do you hold responsible? The first time voter or the political parties that gave them no hope for the future?

    • Eric says:

      03:43pm | 27/08/10

      @Trev - What if it’s not mere selfishness? What if someone realises with increasing experience, that the bright utopian visions of their youth were illusions? What if someone discovers that they were lied to, that what they thought was right was in fact wrong?

      What if, after many years of careful thought, it turns out that the silly old fuddy duddies were (mostly) right all along?

    • dead to me says:

      06:53am | 27/08/10

      Remember if you want a good government don’t vote for Labor. I was watching the morning show today and guess what - more medical mistakes in our hospitals even though more money is being spent but lack of staff being hired, a sign of very poor management from government; NSW schools so cramped that primary school kids are chucked into high school being because State and Federal Labor have screwed up once again. Remeber ALP is bad government.

    • sal says:

      08:37am | 27/08/10

      @dead to me,
      I took the article to be about youth not feeling engaged,  heard or represented.  “Chances were the seat was going to remain stable no matter who I voted for, so I felt disenfranchised in that sense, like my opinions didn’t matter.”
      You saw it as an opportunity to dictate.  “Remember if you want a good government don’t vote for Labor.”
      The problem is people don’t want to be told by major parties (or Punch contributors) what to do, think or believe.  The plea is for clear, concise information which would allow the young (and the not so young) to make an informed decision based on fact and individual issues/policy.
      Dogmatic and fervent belief, as opposed to logical, objective analysis and discussion, does not make for good politics or good life skills.  Dogmatic people don’t make good friends, partners, employees or policy.  Once you dictate, there is no room for flexibility, negotiation, scope or empathy.

    • Joel says:

      10:55am | 27/08/10

      Both sides are as good and bad as each other.

      The notion that one is inherently good, the other inherently bad is a biased farce.

      Mind you, if you were to mention literacy you might want to note who you blame for your lack of it wink

    • Skip says:

      11:28am | 27/08/10

      You know that everyone is entitled to their opinion and say in this Election but the problem that I have found with speaking to people who voted for the Greens is that they did it under protest to the Labor Government.  My question to them was did you read their policies and the answer was no I just wanted the Labor Government to know that they had been doing a bad job.  Now these people are educated people but my comment was well you may have just voted for Labor anyway.  Not in their minds as they thought they were getting back at Labor, how dumb!!
      So Dr. Brown the only way you got where you are is I say mostly by protest and that is no way this wonderful country of of ours should be run!!

    • Aaron says:

      07:59pm | 27/08/10

      What your problem is blaming STATE issues on Federal Govenment. Hey, your not the only one. The whole campain here in Paterson was based around state issues that Billy Baldwon slamed down everybodies throat. Scare Campains….. you know the ones.
      What needs to happen is some education to everybody showing what issues are related to Local,State and Federal parties. It’s stupidity to blame Federal for Local issues etc.
      The biggest problem in all politics is no matter who gets in, they’re blinkered in their policies. They only want to look 3-4ys down the track and only want to impement something in that’ll get them back into power.
      They show no vision for the younger voters and the younger generation growing up today and the future.

    • Peter says:

      08:36am | 27/08/10

      Anyone with a hyphenated surname is either a Socialist or a Green. 

      But I repeat myself.

    • Trev_Northbridge says:

      09:29am | 27/08/10

      Plenty of Hyphenated Conservatives out there Peter

    • sal says:

      09:30am | 27/08/10

      Quick Peter, let Tony know that Concetta Fierravanti-Wells is a plant.

    • Flo says:

      09:37am | 27/08/10

      Jo Bjelke-Peterson?

    • S.L says:

      10:41am | 27/08/10

      @ Flo. Jo doesn’t count he was a Kiwi anyway! His greatest mate was Mr Jerry Mander. Only way he stayed there for many years!

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:04am | 27/08/10

      @Sl..well that and the fact Qld doesn’t have an Upper House (Senate)

    • hot tub political machine says:

      04:32pm | 27/08/10

      I went to a very conservative school - not quite the country club-but not far of.

      Plenty of hyphenated names there. Stamford being a popular beginning half - the last half sounding equally old money

    • The Badger says:

      09:08am | 27/08/10

      Lately I’ve found that if it weren’t for stereotypes, conversation would be much more difficult for the closed-minded.
      Morgan Ivy

    • Trevor says:

      09:09am | 27/08/10

      @ dead to me- you can blame your former coalition government and especially minister Abbott for any staff shortages. He capped GP training places meaning there will be a backlog for years still to come. You can’t just materialise trained GPs out of no where. Same deal for nurses. Abbott did nothing the whole time he was minister to help train more nurses.
      Melissa, If you are voting for a future than it’s Gillard that invested $5b into univeristiea and innovation to create something like 45,000 new university places. It is Labor that wants to increase super to 12% so not only will your future be a good one, we aren’t going to be crippled by aging population demands. It’s Labor that wants to build the NBN to be the backbone of a modern economy and modern jobs. I could go on there are numerous more policies I could discuss (eg infrastructure) - but you didn’t see any of that from Abbott or the Libs. No great future plans.

      I reckon though everyone has got to stop thinking that you are limited to one vote every 3 years and then screaming at the news. Get involved in any political party, get involved in an issue, lobby. If people really want new politics when get involved and make it so. Until people stop commentating from their couches and actually participate in new politics then their demands for that change are just going to look as shallow as the promises they accuse politicians of making.

    • Ben says:

      10:28am | 27/08/10

      @Trevor It’s also Labor that has put forward an increase to the FEE-HELP loan fee of 25% from the previous 20%.  They really aren’t for younger Australians. Neither party really is.

      It’s great to say that they are for university students, but they have not put forward any changes to make it more affordable or easier to go to university since the previous government. There has been more self-interest by both parties this time around than any previous time

    • Joel says:

      11:01am | 27/08/10

      FEE-HELP are for those that do not make a HECS supported placement. That is, they did not meet the cut off for those placements and have elected to pay full fees, with the government acting as the load provider at a significant discount to market rates for personal loans.

      Part of making choices (ie: choosing to undertake tertiary education without obtaining a HECS placement) is bearing the responsibilities for those choices.

      To the uninformed you are intentionally ignoring the HECS-HELP placements to paint a worse picture. Full disclosure around the entire suite of support available to those choosing tertiary education should be advised.

      Personal disclosure: I have used both a HECS position for undergraduate studies and a FEE-HELP load for postgraduate Masters degree.

    • Young Gun says:

      09:30am | 27/08/10

      Peter, I understand that that is a requirement of membership… Idiot.

      I have to agree with this article. This wasn’t my first election, but I still consider myself a young voter. This election, I tried hard to do it properly. I did my research. I went hunting for information on policy. Shockingly, both of the major party sites focus on what the other party is doing wrong, and how they will NOT do that, but gives very little detail on what they WILL do. Too much of the major party policy on the lead up is focused on making the other guy look like a moron while ensuring voters that there is no way that they will make the same mistakes.

      That’s not useful information. We understand that the major parties disagree on policy. We want to know what you WILL do. Be brave and show some initiative in policy and you will be rewarded.

      All those suggesting that anyone who voted Greens didn’t realise they were voting labor is being foolish. The fact that the bulk of the swing away from labor went not to the coalition, but to the Greens indicates that Labor is still too politically right wing, and voters are moving towards a more left wing mindset.

    • Adam Diver says:

      10:20am | 27/08/10

      The respective websites for both major parties had quite a lot of policy infomation. The main issue is a media who do very little research or analysis of said policies. Oh look theres latham off we go. Not there fault though they tell the masses what they want to hear so we buy thier papers and watch the 6 o’clock news.

      But more than that government shouldn’t be about grand ideas and visions, particularly at this time in the economic situation. How about competant and efficient government and services.

      I am a young voter, and want to know where the punch trots out these young intellectuals with there impressive idealogy. Hell I will write a decent piece if someone asks me.

      ” voted for the first time this election. Willing to be a swinging voter” how the hell are you going to swing if you have yet to vote? Or is this purely that you had not made your mind up until election day?

      The youth are idealistic and naive a poor mix indeed. The unbelievable support for the NBN is testament to this fact, with any real tangible benefits for such a massive investment yet to be shown to me. Faster speeds yes, but how exactly does this improve lives. Medical exams via webcam? I am sure the insurance companies would love thier doctors doing that.

    • Sophie says:

      10:50am | 27/08/10

      Agreed Young Gun, I’m 33 so not sure whether you’d call me young or not.  The problem with this election and the last few that I tried to pay attention to, was that it was all negative politics and scare-mongering.  Noone went out campaigning on their policies, I don’t even know what some of them are and I follow politics in the news. 

      Perhaps the Greens and Independents got the votes because they actually informed their electorats on what they were about and lead positive campaigns.  The public have voted, and they want change, there is a fair move away from the major parties because neither are terribly inspiring.

    • Joel says:

      11:10am | 27/08/10

      NBN: tangible benefits for the Small and Medium Enterprise:
      - breakup of natural monopoly and competitive retail components of Telstra
      - availability of services currently not available over NBN:
      -> Offsite backup and storage of critical data (current upload speeds renders this near useless for SMEs unless they’re running many parallel connections)
      -> Option for greater use of VOIP, “cloud” (hosted) applications and storage technologies,
      -> Option for greater participation in the online economy (see above for services that can reduce risk and costs for SMEs and scale effectively as they grow) as communities with little broadband access gain greater bandwidth

      Then we can go and discuss the size of files required to be available in the medical world for analysis and review, with the connectivity and bandwidth upgrades providing an alternatives to the patchwork storage of such files that the medical world currently works with.

      Then there’s education.

      Then there’s the scalability (and lower imposition of required base stations for wireless connectivity that has limited and monopolised spectrum in the space required for the 4G technologies)…

      Care to discuss more?

      The Snowy Hydro Scheme was started by the ALP under Ben Chifley, did not have an absolute ROI for the first 3 years of operations, it’s business case rested on future capabilities, rural electrification grew more widespread as this and a greater investment in the transportation technology for electricity was made - again as an infrastructure investment. Without this rural communities would still be struggling with the supply of power, and the Australian Eastern Seaboard would be without its fastest black restart source.

      Why mention this? Because we’re looking at another infrastructure plank, with benefits that will last for a minimum of twenty years - the fibres themselves have an extremely long lifespan - and a country where monopoly assets have had a regulatory environment to balances costs with recovery models (even if people don’t always agree). We can do this - and it will most definitely form the basis for much of the access requirements in the first half of the 21st century and beyond.

    • JC says:

      11:43am | 27/08/10

      i don’t understand your point. do you think the parties all held out their policies for only the over 30’s to see?
      ALL voters were subjected to the fear campaigns and the “i know you are, you said you are, but what am i?” not just the young.
      Thats modern elections for you. Deal with it.

    • Shifter says:

      12:44pm | 27/08/10

      @Joel: I’m really glad that someone gets that the NBN is not for faster Youtube/Facebook/“Linux ISOs”, your broader outlook is refreshing.

    • Sophie says:

      01:16pm | 27/08/10

      @Shifter   Nah, the NBN isn’t for FaceBooke and Twitter, it’s just for us selfish city folk   /s

    • mickijo says:

      01:34pm | 27/08/10

      It is hard to work out who is the smartest, most honourable,the best to choose when the media concentrates only on Ms Gillard’s earlobes and Tony Abbott’s swim wear. The media cheapens everything and the pollies do not help with their common visciousness. You can only cross your fingers and hop’the best man wins’.

    • Carl says:

      09:34am | 27/08/10

      Maybe if young people could tear themselves away from facebook, twitter or some of the other junk for a few minutes and listen or read about the info put out in policies, they may have some understanding. It is not a simple process getting the info out required to implement a program to run a country.

      Rudd tried the simple sound bite approach in 07 with groceries, fuel, cheap housing, climate, sorry, Kyoto, workchoices, climate again. The kids loved it ‘cause it all sounded so simple and he did it on twitter…..how cool was that. Wasn’t so simple huh ??

      Its like anything else these days for some of the young’uns. If its too hard and someone doesnt cuddle up to them its not fair. Being patronising and all, you’ll get it one day.

    • Carmel says:

      10:52am | 27/08/10

      Well done, don’t be inspiring or anything just throw around some insults.. as if that is going to get young people interested.  There is nothing wrong with idealism.. plus there was barely any actual campaigning out there, just mud-slinging and insults (much like you!)

    • Stand Darsh says:

      11:07am | 27/08/10

      Read: Im cranky and bitter my best years have past me. Suck it up grandpa.

    • Kelly says:

      11:12am | 27/08/10

      @Carmel…
      Why is it up to everyone else to “inspire” and get young people interested?  Young people talk about the pollies “take, take take & all about me” attitude, how about taking a look at how people feel about Gen Y?????

    • jmac says:

      11:17am | 27/08/10

      Yeah well done. Maybe you should check it out, but last time I heard, facebook and twitter were allowing young voters to directly communicate with each other and in some instances the politicians and candidates campaigning.

      Just generalize why don’t you.

      Idiot.

    • Carmel says:

      12:22pm | 27/08/10

      @Kelly   Examples please?  Just more mud-slinging and generation bayhsing does not help anyone.  And if you want to talk selfish, what about the “think of the children” brigade?  Aren’t they being selfish as everything is about “working families” struggling these days? 

      We need vision, we need an NBN, we desperately need infrastructure.  Don’t go blaming young voters, the majority are middle-aged people who are just as “me, me, me” as the young people.  We ALL have our own self-interests.

    • Chaz says:

      01:59pm | 27/08/10

      @Carmel:

      And just why do we need an NBN?

    • Shifter says:

      02:38pm | 27/08/10

      @Chaz: have a look at Joel’s response further up. That’s why a NBN should be built.

    • Carl says:

      03:01pm | 27/08/10

      @ carmel, i dont care if i inspire you, there are just basic facts in life. running a country is not like running a cake stall.

      Idealism is great but it scares the crap out of the general populous when they find that to be ideal its gonna cost some coin, from their own pocket. Any clues why there wasnt any big flash new vision this time around ??? Most didnt want it, they want stability right now…..and you need a cuddle.

      @ stand darsh. I’m right in my best years and happy as, great family, mortgage paid off, earning plenty of money (mining…. shock horror) and i dont need to suck anything up because things are going just the way i like it ! maybe you need to lighten up a little sunshine

    • hot tub political machine says:

      04:35pm | 27/08/10

      Carl I find it interesting you can call facebook ect junk (which you are in many ways correct about) but not realise that the info in the policies put out needs so many “pinches of salt” that its about as reputable a source of info as say..twitter

    • Carmel says:

      06:44pm | 28/08/10

      @Carl   Maybe you need some reading comprehension.  Our politicians need to inspire us, I don’t care what you as some cranky, “I own my own house” fart thinks.  And you know what, we are stable, we didn’t go in to a recession as we’ve had good management of the economy and regulations put in years ago to prevent the kind of debacle the States had.

      Are you so cynical that you wouldn’t want improvements?  And remember, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or do you only care about how a mining tax might affect your bonuses?

    • Matthew says:

      09:51am | 27/08/10

      A few issues to which I take umbrage:

      1) I always find it interesting the way people can observe how shallow political parties are but somehow think a party like the Greens is real and authentic.  The Greens and there leader Bob Brown is just as shallow as any other politician or political group. Why did Greens preference Labor if it was against the ETS proposed. by Labor? The Greens will take as many cheap votes as possible including the author of this article where people are more concerned about feeling good about themselves then making a real difference.

      2) The Greens party does not have an open mind to nuclear power one of the most greenest energies available. Australia is designed for 2 sources of energy Solar which may become viable in the next 50 years and Nuclear power that is viable now. We have a country that is loaded with Uranium and has huge expanses of desert that nuclear waste can be safely stored. Greens are against nuclear power for political reasons alone.

      3) Carbon emissions: Can someone please explain to me what the benefit will be to mother earth is if Australia will cut its carbon emissions by 100%. Yes 100%.  There are several leading scientists and groups that are disputing the cause and effect of human produced carbon emissions. Why are the Greens not encouraging them to be heard. Why are any dissidents from their agenda being censored. Is Censorship ok when it applies to groups that disagree with the Greens. Why are we not focussing on reducing pollution of all kinds. We are now fixated on carbon emissions rather then pollution in general.

      4) Any party that supports late term abortions right up to 9 months is hardly humane or should be encouraged to influence Australians lives.

      Be careful what you wish for. A utopian green world is easy to sell. Coming back to reality to Make Australia a better place is much harder and I never lose sight of that.

    • Joel says:

      11:18am | 27/08/10

      1) Lesser of two evils - what was the Leader of the Opposition’s stance (assuming it could be taken as truth and not ad-lib falsities)?
      2) Nuclear power is neither green (embodied energy for construction, operations, disposal, containment, decommissioning and deconstruction) nor cost efficient (see cost blowouts in the UK for decommissioning and deconstruction and the lack of private sector participation where all liability insurance is not completely underwritten by the state)
      3) There is always reviews within the scientific community of all hypotheses and theories. Newton’s Theory of Gravity is false - unless you consider generalisations - yet it is still worth teaching, both for historic reasons and for its use in the context of the world we live in (even with its inaccuracies). Thus there will always be review and reevaluation of the science of climate - nothing is ever done and dusted. That said, over 97% of climate scientists agree that greenhouse gases are having an impact and the world is warming. This isn’t your high school lab experiment - this is the global environment and the consequences may well be catastrophic. For risk analysis I’ll side with the insurance industry who have most to lose. For those that don’t and believe that nothing is of concern, I’d suggest opening up an insurance company, investing your life savings in it and see how you go.
      4) Ah, here we go, you’ve just managed to show your true colours. Late term abortions may be required (and I use the word *may* not *must*) in many medical circumstances. I assume you’ve consulted with the AMA over the medical professions view on the subject?

    • SarahJaneJones says:

      02:01pm | 29/08/10

      1) Well they are hardly going to preference a political party where only 40% of the MP’s believe in man made climate change. So of course they preferenced Labor. The beauty of a preferential voting system is that you can make sure that people voting for a smaller party don’t end up disadvantaging the larger party that they would have voted for on a 2 party preferred basis.

      2) Not going to get into a nuclear power debate, but suffice to say there are many legitimate arguments against Nuclear power and not supporting it is a completely scientifically and politically valid position. You may disagree with it, but it doesn’t make a party “shallow” because they do not support it.

      3) There are basically no leading scientists and groups that dispute the cause of climate change. If you find one I’ll eat my hat. 97% of climate scientists agree with the IPCC position, every single scientific organzation of any international or national standing agrees with the IPCC position (except the American Association of Petroleum Geologists which still doesn’t dispute it, it just is non commital) and every single National Academy of Science in every country in the developed world agrees with the IPCC position.

      4) late term abortions are sometimes necessary medically for either the fetus or the mother. Wanting to allow for late term abortions in some cases does not mean the Greens are advocating for late term abortions to be widely available.

    • thomas vesely says:

      09:59am | 27/08/10

      dear children,an important lesson.its about power and status.when they say “i want to give something back” add quietly in your mind the words “to me”.all life is about hierarchies. ask your self,constantly, who benefits.ask always “how much to whom”.the more pious it sounds,dig deeper.ask why the sin resonates.when you see a broken thing,it suits some.and some get upset if you question it.tradition got us here(politically).
      why a 3 year term?surely the effects of changes take longer than 3 years to be assesable?.why not vote on a lot of separate issues by internet? read a lot,knowledge is everything,relish the real richness possible if you shed the crap told to you by self serving smarmy bastards. lol.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:09am | 27/08/10

      Everytime I hear the phrase ” I want to give something back’ I keep thinking of Russ Cargill,the EPA guy from the Simpsons…..

      “I wanted to give something back, not the money, but something’ ...

    • Ashley says:

      10:42am | 27/08/10

      I’m amazed for someone who want’s to vote compassionately and considers themselves humanitarian that you have not once mentioned about the problems faced by Australia’s indigenous population, youth unemployment and the need for youth skills training and higher education and youth homelessness.

      As much as environmental and refugee issues are important. There are more pressing issues which are facing Australian youth of various backgrounds, including refugee youth everyday.

    • Randal says:

      10:56am | 27/08/10

      Melissa, it is refreshing to hear the views of a first time voter who wants to engage politically and whilst we have differing political ideologies I support anyone who embraces the democratic process and wants to be involved in making a difference, and I am often depressed by the many members of the community, both young and old alike, who are apathetic to the political process in this nation.

      Remember also that whilst your vote in the House may not have altered the seat you voted in, it did have an impact in the Senate, and seats such as Melbourne and Denison not that long ago were considered safe for Labor, likewise the seats of New England, Lyne and Kennedy for the Nationals - so things can change and quickly.

      So you keep fighting for what you believe in and seeking information from all the parties and independents, encourage discussion and opinion from your friends, as this is after all what democracy is all about and in the end it is the people who determine who represents them, whether that be Labor, Liberal, National, Green, independent or anyone else who wants to throw their hat in the ring.

      Government for the people and by the people is what we have currently and the people have chosen for the past decades a two party solution, and in the end it will be the people just like yourself who determine whether that changes, and as we have seen in this election the power just one seat in the Parliament can have.

    • Barny says:

      11:04am | 27/08/10

      The thing about young people is most are only interested in idealistic policies that do not work in the real world.  Most end up voting Green or Labor so it is a waste of time and money for the Liberals to target them when their minds are already made up.

    • Joel says:

      11:21am | 27/08/10

      Surely not so cynical!

      Isn’t this what the media castigated Julia Gillard for allegedly saying about another demographic…

      Nearly anyone can be moved from one side to the other (both directions) with the right people, policies and pitches. The media however are the biggest elephant in the room on this part though.

    • SarahJaneJones says:

      02:06pm | 29/08/10

      I know far more young people who voted for the LNP this election than Labor or the Greens. It is ridiculous to set aside an entire demographic on the basis that “they won’t vote for us anyway”

      I also noticed (and of course this is a huge generalization from my own personal experience) that those who voted LNP were horribly uninformed about their policies and politics in general. Those who voted Labor and especially Greens tended to have a much better idea of what was going on and the policies of each party.

    • Wake Up Yung Uns says:

      11:22am | 27/08/10

      Youth want the world to revolve around them. How about they make a contribution first then earn the right to some respect.

    • Julie says:

      06:46pm | 28/08/10

      slow.clap   You could make a politician, sling some mud around but don’t suggest anything useful.  I’m sure you contributed a lot yourself during your teen years too.

    • N8 says:

      11:23am | 27/08/10

      I have to disagree, I am young and I didn’t feel ignored. The fact is that the two major parties don’t agree with you, not that they don’t care about your vote. Tony Abbott doesn’t believe that there is enough evidence for climate change to make any big changes, Julia Gillard is more interested in using it as a wedge than actually doing anything about it, and she thinks it is real but not all that urgent. Your position appears to be that it is real and it is an urgent issue, these are all reasonable positions (despite what you see from people demonizing each side).

      Just because they don’t agree with you on this issue doesn’t mean they are ignoring you. Have the ALP and LNP listened to people put this view forward? Absolutely, and they have to varying degrees accepted and rejected it. Tony Abbott moved from calling it crap to putting minor green policies in place. Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd moved from an ETS without global backing to only doing it with global backing. They both heard advice and shifted their policies. Just because they didn’t come up with the policies that you wanted doesn’t mean that they ignored you.

      A political party’s job is to put their position forward, and if people agree with them then vote for them. Their job isn’t to change their views every time someone disagrees with them. The whole populist poll driven government is the main problem that I see with our system that got us into this mess. I think they should be open to advice and shouldn’t lock themselves into a position, certainly, but they are supposed to do what they think is right not what they think is popular.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:38pm | 27/08/10

      N8, well said. And perhaps the most impartial comment I have read in a long time. No JuLIAR or Tony rAbbott to be seen, glad. Could it be that both parties policies have merit and as an idividial it is up to us to weigh up the options and decide which one we go with? Revolutionery idea that.

      I am a young voter also and though I did not feel any policy was being directed at me purely to secure my vote, I didn’t feel ignored. Besides I am young, healthy, I own a home because I worked hard for it and bought within my means, I have a job that pays back my hecs debt and decent enough internet access that offers me the ability to vent on websites such as this - which really is a benefit for all wink

      What do I need or deserve? I would rather tax dollars go to where they are required. Things like roads, hospitals and getting the internet that I currently have access to out to where people don’t have it. All these things indirectly benefit me. I drive on roads and one day I will no doubt get sick. I want to see action on climate change, but I don’t think it requires the panic that many currently claim. I think the first step is to reform our all consuming lifesyles and conserve what it available to us now. I am gen Y and I don’t have the me me me I want I want I want tendancies that most young people (including one of my siblings who came from the same household) have. But like most people on here have stated, Gen Y will soon grow up soon and take out their frustrations on generation next. The cycle will continue.

    • Lisa says:

      10:31pm | 28/08/10

      Interesting discussion N8 and fairsfair.
      I guess I have moved into the ‘mum’ demographic now, and I suppose it never occurred to me before that a two-major-party political system should specifically woo *me*, the ‘young’ voter.
      Up until now I guess I just felt that voting was an adult responsibility, with a whole community to consider in my vote.
      However, I didn’t actually look that closely at my political assumptions at the time, that took a lot longer.
      The shallow campaign is not specifically the experience of the young voter… it just is a reflection of the nature of our political system.
      In relation to one’s own political views, they tend to reflect your own experiences and perhaps hardships in your own life.
      I majored in political science at university, but it wasn’t until I became involved in small business that I really had cause to reflect on my political viewpoints, or even, prejudices.
      Called ‘growing up’, or even ‘growing old’, I guess.
      Reality is more complicated than I thought, as a first-time voter.

    • Carbon Trader Profiteer says:

      11:39am | 27/08/10

      The problem with young people is they want everything handed to them and are not willing to do some research to find out some real facts. Your swallowing of the whole Anthropegenic Global Warming cannard is proof of that. I’ve yet to meet one young person who has gone out and read something like ‘The Hockey Stick Illusion’ by Andrew Montford. Brainwashed may be too strong a word….

    • The Badger says:

      12:46pm | 27/08/10

      Sorry,
      I just don’t have the time to get PhD’s in multiple sciences and conduct decades of research to find out some “real facts”.

      Guess I’ll just go with what 99% of the scientists that have the qualifications say.

      Or perhaps I’ll just read what Bolt has to say. Now there is a man who is master of everything.

      We lie the loudest when we lie to ourselves.
      Eric Hoffe

    • Tim says:

      06:38am | 28/08/10

      Well said Badger

    • LC says:

      12:06pm | 30/08/10

      @ Carbon Trader Profiteer

      While I’m a fencesitter on the issue, I’d much rather myself and others cut down on thier greenhouse gas emmisions and later find out that the whole thing is a hoax than do nothing to cut greenhouse gas emmisions and find out they weren’t kidding.

      And here’s the kicker: I’m 26.

    • Andy says:

      11:52am | 27/08/10

      It is good to hear that there are some younger members of this fine nation out there who do care, and show genuine interest, in how our government is run.

      The biggest issue that I have, and it is by no means levelled at the author, is that the vast majority of this nation seem to base their votes on what the figureheads of the two major parties, and the outspoken individuals of the minorities and independents, have to say about each other. Either that, or succumbing to peer pressure or popular opinion/media hype.

      I come from a traditionally strong Nationals seat, and for the majority of issues my political preference remains. However, since 2001 I have been in a different electorate for many a state and national election, and have found that the Nationals do not contest in all electorates. So what do I do? Research. This has resulted in some interesting choices come polling time.

      This is what I encourage all people to do. Research all parties policies, and then find out the specifics of what each candidate are campaigning for in the electorate. This allows for a balanced and rational decision to be made on who you are voting for and why.

      I believe that if more people actually researched who they were voting for and why, there would be a much different result for this election. Also, understand how preferences work. Sometimes it might just be worth the effort of filling out the boxes under the line…

    • Kirsa says:

      01:11pm | 27/08/10

      Well written article ... however this quote I have to comment on

      “For those of you who think that youth are apathetic, it is usually because we feel disillusioned and excluded. Our opinions don’t matter; our vote isn’t worth being persuaded. So why bother?”

      You bother young lady as its YOUR future. Both my sons are first time voters too and instead of sitting back on their hands and wailing that their voice isn’t heard they go out and join a politial party (young Libs) and they get involved and go and hand out how to vote cards on polling day.  Sure they dont get paid for their time and they had to get out of bed at 5am - but hey, harden up princess!

      Stop being a victim and start acting.  Thats the way you change things and have your voice heard.

    • Doug says:

      03:04pm | 27/08/10

      Melissa, how quickly you jump at an arbitrary number - 40 per cent - as the magic solution. What an utterly devastating decision for all the people, the families, the kids who depend on the jobs lost by that call. And haven’t you learnt yet that every new generation thinks it knows the answer until it grows up and has to support itself and the next generation. No, I don’t think we will be listening to you anytime soon.

    • Carl says:

      03:27pm | 27/08/10

      When the greens outline their fully costed plans against the budget and deliver the news that we will have $x deficit / surplus for x number of years, and are judged by the people in an election on an entire platform, they will then have the legitimacy they currently believe they have.

    • BK says:

      03:27pm | 27/08/10

      Who knew that teenagers could become alienated?

    • Jeff says:

      04:35pm | 27/08/10

      So true!!

      Very well written article. Politicians need to understand the words they speak are willing to be accepted by the populus, but when they start spinning the lines people turn off!

      Get to the point of what you are trying to say and you will have not just the younger generation, but a greater share of the entire population!

    • Justin M says:

      11:36pm | 27/08/10

      Did it ever occur to you that if The Greens allowed the ETS to pass they would have been virtually irrelevant at this election? Locking in a low target was just a cynical excuse that Gen Y and the media swallowed hook, line and sinker…

    • Antique says:

      08:56am | 28/08/10

      It’s not just the young who are turned off.  The older generation have had more experience and can now see through the Liberal and Labor camps and have also revolted.

    • Ryan says:

      02:57pm | 28/08/10

      Just to clarify, the first Greens Federal MP was Michael Organ in the seat of Cunningham in NSW from 2002 to 2004, who defeated the now incumbent Sharon Bird. The only difference then was that we didn’t have a hung parliament and he was completely ineffective (as, for example, the cross-bench in the senate was when Howard had a majority in both houses), and so no-one noticed or cared.

      Except in situations in which the distribution of seats is extremely close (e.g. our current situation), the election of minor parties has little bearing on government. Yet, because it is impossible to vote for a hung parliament (as some commentators have suggested), you cannot determine whether your vote will be so important as to determine the balance of power in the lower house by voting for a minor party.

    • Pedantic says:

      03:48pm | 28/08/10

      I’m just being a pedant but the seat of Melbourne isn’t actually the Greens first lower house seat. They used to have Cunningham which they once won in a 2002 by-election. It is however the first lower house seat they’ve won in a general election.
      That said, as someone who is under 25 and doesn’t have kids I can’t help but ask what are the major parties going to do for me? I’m sick of hearing about what they’re going to do for families.

    • Shockadelic says:

      07:18pm | 28/08/10

      What point is there in detailed policies when neither the voters or the media will bother noticing?
      When One Nation first appeared they had clear policies on *many* issues. Did anyone notice? No, the media did their usual simplistic pigeonholing and the voters responded like Pavlovian dogs.
      Even if you convinced 10% or more voters to support you (as has happened with the Democrats, One Nation and the Greens) you still get zip result, because of the non-proportional outcome.
      We don’t have ‘democracy’. We have an elected dictatorship.

    • Matt Samson says:

      12:41am | 29/08/10

      I’m 26 so probably young, but I don’t feel alienated by the two major parties in fact quite the opposite, I find them insulting. They insult the intelligence of young and old with their shallow slogans and shallow policies. Governments used to have VISION, a 30 year VISION such as the snowy mountain scheme, such as building new dams, building the railways. These days its all about the three year election cycle, policies that are in the forward ‘estimates’ that the political parties NEVER deliver and never have to deliver because they’ll likely be voted out before they can ever be implemented because of how SHALLOW they are.

    • Phil Ossoffer says:

      09:03am | 29/08/10

      Give all australians upto the age of ten the right to vote,what a dynamic political landscape this could create.Imagine the first 11 year old pollie,the free icecreams,the money thrown at primary schools would eventually breed an edified electorate thus ending the childish he says ,she says ,slanging matches we witness from our ideas bereft members.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter