Here’s a great story in the spirit of the festive season.

Aiming for independence

Melbourne-based academic and human rights advocate Sekai Shand has spent the majority of the last 25 years working in various international disaster zones.

But she recently returned home to the African village where she was raised to perform her most important mission yet - helping the women of her village overcome poverty and violence through self-sufficiency.

Home these days is not suburban Melbourne but a small village called Matarutse that is 200km from the Zimbabwean capital, Harare.

Laughing at what she calls her “midlife crisis”, Shand is deadly serious about making a real difference with a program aimed at true self-sufficiency – of the type that will never requite another aid agency setting foot in her village.

Shand was born in Matarutse, and made several trips back to visit her 80-year old-mother. She’d give money each time she visited, but soon realised that these one-off donations changed nothing in the long run.

“I just arrived, splashed money around and then disappeared,” she says.

So Shand devised a better plan.

A former advisor to Tim Costello with years of on-the-ground international development experience in places like Rwanda and Indonesia, she was better placed than most to plan long-term.

“We have donors who give us seed once every year but then that ends. We need to become self-sufficient, so that we have grain and seed throughout the year, without relying on anyone else.”

In a community of approximately 300 people, almost 50 per cent of Shand’s own peer group have already died from HIV/Aids.

“I started by joining the Women’s Burial Society, raising money to pay for the coffins, but it wasn’t long before I became sure we could do something else,” says Shand.

“The women (of the village) were spending hours each day walking up to ten kilometres to grind their maze and collect water.

“I wanted to give them work and the power to control their resources.”

In the 12 months since her return Shand has gained funding for a maize grinder through a loan from a lawyer friend in Melbourne and with the use of her own car, organises monthly visits to Harare for villagers requiring regular HIV Aids treatment.

She’s also started raising chickens, a project more difficult than it sounds. Shand has to strap the noisy brood to the roof of her care and drive the 200km to market.

Social relationships are also on the agenda.

“In any project such as this one in my village, we must involve the men. I work with the women, but we must bring the men along.”

The younger, male, generation are of particular concern for Shand:

“There is an increasing level of violence and abuse among young women in the village because the young men are bored.

They are brought up to believe as men they must provide for their families but when there is no work, they drink too much and go home, often hurting their wives.”

But her biggest current challenge is promoting self-sufficiency.

“I have worked in international aid agencies and travelled far and wide and I know that you can give aid to a country and then return ten years later and things are as if they’d never had any aid at all.

“But his time I want to start at the grass roots level and work with the community so that in I can go back to organisations and say, this is what we can achieve, with only “this” amount of money.”

Shand admits the pilot project is a huge undertaking and that much of the past year has felt like an “uphill” battle, but she is determined to stay.

“I get my inspiration from the women I work with in the village.

“I may have Western education but I am lacking in their wisdom and their experience.”

Dr Sekai Shand is also a board member of ActionAid Australia, a non-for-profit organisation currently working on a project that aims to empower women suffering from violence in Afghanistan.

Most commented

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:53am | 18/12/10

      We’ve had numerous stories by and about aid agencies on The Punch. One common thread is that they only seem to care about women, as in this example. Sure, men are mentioned, but only as a threat.

      Since aid agencies are only interested in helping women, why should men support them?

    • Lucy Kippist

      Lucy Kippist says:

      08:47am | 18/12/10

      Eric, this is blatantly not true, particularly with respect to Sekai Shand’s work - she even makes specific reference to the importance of including men and men’s issues in community development work this article, did you not read the quote?

    • Eric says:

      08:56am | 18/12/10

      Yes, Lucy, I did read the quote. Here it is:

      “The younger, male, generation are of particular concern for Shand:

      “There is an increasing level of violence and abuse among young women in the village because the young men are bored.

      They are brought up to believe as men they must provide for their families but when there is no work, they drink too much and go home, often hurting their wives.”

      In other words, men are only considered because they might hurt their wives. There is not any sort of concern for the welfare of the men for its own sake - only for the sake of the impact it has on women.

      The other articles to which I refer on The Punch are “Ignore Water, Ignore Women”, by an international aid scholar, and “Why There is no International Men’s Day”, by an aid executive. Both offer similar reasoning - men are the problem, women are the ones who need to be helped.

      This reflects a disturbing misandrist trend among charitable organisations in general.

    • Adam Diver says:

      09:35am | 18/12/10

      It takes some effort to be comprehensively embarrased by Eric, but there you go. To be fair I fully agree with Eric on this one. How do you improve a community by focusing on half of them?

    • Heath Karl says:

      02:26pm | 18/12/10

      What happened to this quote, Eric;

      “In any project such as this one in my village, we must involve the men. I work with the women, but we must bring the men along”

      This one contradicts your ‘phassile’ claim.

    • Eric says:

      04:48pm | 18/12/10

      No it doesn’t, Heath Karl. It is followed by the words I quoted, which make it clear that the only reason to “involve the men” is to protect the women.

      My objection stands. International aid and charity tends to ignore men or treat them as obstructions, while only helping women. Is this fair?

    • AliceC says:

      08:12am | 20/12/10

      @Eric,

      Yes, lets stop helping women, anyone in fact. Let’s leave eveyone to thier own devices, and all will be fine.

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      11:50am | 20/12/10

      I dont agree with everything that Eric says.  I do agree with this however and it is a trend I have noticed myself.  There are some charities out there that do fantastic work for men as well however, so as a man I would be more inclined to support those as I empathise with these issues more.

      In the case above, the point is that Men should be included into a project like this because its for the benefit of that community that they consitute roughly half of, not because of the levels of violence are increasing.

      @ AliceC, I dont think Eric at anyime has said that this project should be stopped, what he has said though is there is a more equitable and productive way of looking at things that do not place blame on one section of a community to try and induce that section’s co-operation with a scheme.

    • John Smythe says:

      12:47pm | 20/12/10

      Eric, I understand where you are coming from, but, in this case, I think it’s miss-guided. I don’t pretend to know the whole situation, but I don’t think there can be much doubt to the plight of women in these communities.

      What we have here, is an individual recognising the plight of a certain group, and doing what she can. I’ll admit that this article is all I have read on the topic, but unlike certain articles raised in the Punch by others with their own extremist feministic agendas, I don’t get that at all from what Sekai is trying to do.

      Let’s forget the scope for the moment, and just realise someone is trying to good for some struggling people. It all takes but a small step to start it all. Imagine for a moment, that her efforts start to show real changes for the community, in say, agriculture. They begin to produce sufficient amounts of food, and stock so that when there is more than enough, trade can be opened up with each other, or other communities.

      What starts out as a step to assist one subset of a community to become self-sufficient can now extend out to empower the community as a whole.

      Anyway, that’s how I interpret her efforts. But given all the usual sensationalist rubbish other writers throw at us without any concern of solutions, I can see why you have reacted as you have.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:06am | 18/12/10

      Would of been better had there been positive outcomes. As of yet, all I can see that is someone is trying to do something. That has been done for decades, yet very little progress ever seems to be made.

      Don’t get me wrong, I hope she exceeds her own expectations, I just won’t be holding my breathe.

    • Colin J Ely says:

      10:03am | 18/12/10

      Why is it that Zimbabwe, as a British Colony, was a net exporter of food and had a good standard of living, but since gaining self government has had to import food and their standard of living has gone down the toilet? Did the perfidious British take all the rain and natural resources with them when they left? wink What has changed for the country in that time? I am sure that a lot of countries, including Australia, have sent aid in both money and kind, what has happened to it?

    • Greg says:

      12:06am | 19/12/10

      The Zimbabweans were given a fully functioning and efficient first world country called Rhodesia in 1980, and they have managed to turn it into a third world hellhole.

      They only have themselves to blame, and no amount of aid or assistance is ever going to help.

      And why should we help a racist country that persecutes, steals from and murders white people? Why shouldn’t the country be embargoed and boycotted like apartheid South Africa was?

    • Eric says:

      01:53pm | 19/12/10

      Good point, Greg. While noting the misandry in the article, I missed the location.

      Zimbabwe is a disaster area under Mugabe’s dictatorship (installed by Jimmy Carter and Malcolm Fraser, among others). Until the despotic, racist government is replaced, nothing will help the people.

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      11:55am | 20/12/10

      Wont happen quickly though.  There is no large deposits of oil in Zimbabwe and Mugabe is not threatning his neighbours, just the people that are unfortuante enough to have him for a President

    • Ur$ula says:

      05:29pm | 19/12/10

      It was the the interference of the “do gooders” in support of black majority rule.  These people involve themselves persistently advocating freedom to have lives. These people are worse off and being beaten and lied to by the very people they promised freedom.  Where are the “do gooders” they are raped, starving, tortured beaten and killed. How are they better off and why did you stop caring for their needs?  Robert Mugabe is responsible for mass murder exceeding Hitlers numbers.

    • Eric says:

      09:35am | 20/12/10

      @AliceC - Perhaps, instead of setting up straw men, you could add something positive to the discussion?

      How about helping everyone who needs help, regardless of gender? Unfortunately, feminists don’t like that idea. There were actually some “charities” operating after the Haiti earthquake that point-blank refused to give any food to men. They would only feed women.

      How could anyone support such sexism?

    • Lucy Kippist

      Lucy Kippist says:

      10:02am | 20/12/10

      Eric, I’m goingto assume that you were not fortunate enough to hear Dr Shand speak because one of the things that struck me most about her approach was her willingness to see the community and its future development as a whole - women and men, children and adults and elders of the community, educated, like herself with the more traditionally and lesser educated.

      Women are integral to programs like this one because they focus on issues affecting day to day life; as mothers and grandmothers they are at the centre of domestic village life. 

      Men have exactly the same importance in the life of a village but traditional roles dictate that they play a significantly different role to women day to day.

      We are all familiar and most of the time empathetic with your worthy pursuit of men’s rights but in the case of this type of development work -where the whole community is consulted and considered-you really are off the mark.

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      12:21pm | 20/12/10

      Gotta love the good old stereotypes over women being more empathtic and therefore deserving of greater involvement with such projects.  If you focus on one segment of society to help all of it, dont be surprised when it doesnt quite work out for you.

      True assistance programs need pariticpation from all walks of life to be truly able to assist.

    • Eric says:

      05:22am | 21/12/10

      Well, perhaps I’ve gone overboard on this article. It seemed to be one in a series - some of which I’ve referred to in other comments.

      But if, as you say, Dr Shand really is an exception, then please accept my apologies to both of you.

    • John Smythe says:

      10:16am | 20/12/10

      Lucy, excellent article. You are one of the few Punchers that consistently produces enjoyable/interesting reading. Thank you.

      Perhaps Sekai should start a project up with Global Giving, if she hasn’t already. She can have multiple projects targeting each requirement/need.

      I understand her desire to empower the community by becoming self-sufficient, but she can also accomplish that by setting a target total donationary value.

      Anyway, cheers.

    • Lucy Kippist

      Lucy Kippist says:

      01:13pm | 20/12/10

      Thanks very much John Smythe, that is a very nice thing to say - I will make sure that I pass on your suggestion to Sekai.

    • Mandy Mc says:

      08:35pm | 20/12/10

      Hear Hear John, Global Giving is a great cause (allowing small Social Entreprenuers to set up aggregated funding sources) and I concur with John’s comments your article’s have been great (even if you didn’t publish one of mine, ha ha) - keep up the great work Punch crew

    • AliceC says:

      02:41pm | 20/12/10

      @Lucy

      Great article, glad to see someone who is from the area going back and finding ways for the people to help themselves. Would love to hear of more stories like this in the future.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter