Looking for love? You’d know, then, that most people have a subconscious list of attributes that his or her ideal partner must possess: ‘Must be tall’, maybe. ‘Good looking’. ‘Generous’. ‘Noble of spirit’. ‘Kind to puppies’. Some people’s lists are flexible. Most aren’t. It’s tough out there.

Phwoar: the dead sexy Charles Bukowksi dragging on a bunger.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there’s a new one: ‘Must be able to write’.

In an era where so much of our communication happens via the written word, writing has become as much if not more of an aphrodisiac than a fat bank balance or supermodel measurements.

Haphazardly applying capital letters, rambling senselessly in emails or posting poorly-spelt Facebook updates puts you at an enormous disadvantage when it comes to attracting a mate or cementing a relationship. It becomes increasingly difficult to remind a potential suitor that you look like Jessica Simpson in real life if you sound like her on paper.

Pre-internet, this wasn’t a problem. Unless you were courting an author (or, god help you, a journalist) you’d be unlikely to see much of anything a partner or potential partner wrote beyond the odd birthday card. Now all of us are writing to each other, via dozens of different methods, daily.

So how are you meant to compete? Problem is, the web is heaving with good writing. It’s like porn for word nerds. And it’s so accessible that we’re becoming dangerously desensitised to it. As a consequence, our expectations of our partners’ real-life writing skills are becoming unrealistic.

If, like me, you regularly find yourself lying awake at night, feverishly thumbing your iPhone as you follow the Twitter updates of writers like @caitlinmoran, @indiaknight or those from @thedailybeast you’ll know how addictive top shelf, black label writing is. These people are verbal gymnasts. Every syllable is tight. Every phrase flawless. Each joke climaxes in a wave of 140 perfectly punctuated characters. “Wish my girlfriend would do that,” one of my male friends gasped raggedly after one acrobatic exchange between Caitlin and India the other day.

Too much of that sort of thing and a text reading “Did u pick up spaggeti for dinner” becomes a turn-off. Even a perfectly serviceable email like “Morning darling, get to work okay?” starts to look yawningly vanilla.

But you need to remember that these people are professionals. They’re paid to do it. Many of them write for publications with paywalls, so you need a credit card before you can get off on their work. Your boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife mightn’t be in line for a Pulitzer. But at least you can touch them.

That said, it doesn’t hurt to pick up a few simple tricks from the experts to spice things up every now and again. No one can help you much with actual content, but even a bit of sexy spelling can do wonders:

Form the plural of ‘bureau’ with an ‘x’ instead of an ‘s’ (optional but how hot is the ‘x’?). Learn the difference between ‘advise’ and ‘advice’ (mmmm). And I’m shocking myself that I’m exposing such a personal fetish in a public forum but…make a plural into a possessive with an apostrophe following the ‘s’ (I can barely breathe).

Last resort, use a spellcheck. It’s cosmetic surgery for the written word. Sure it’s unnatural, it’s deceptive, and too many Americanisms will reveal you’ve had some work, but if you need just a little tweak to perfect what your mama gave you, it might be the answer.

Finally, remember that everyone gets better if they practise. That’s the verb ‘practise’. ‘Practise’ with an ‘s’. Oh god. I’m off to have a cold shower.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

59 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Rob says:

      06:43am | 15/09/10

      Ms Carlton, I cannot agree with you more. Having had dalliances with ‘online dating’, I have found nothing turns me off more than the butchering of what should be simple English. Without wanting to appear snobbish, while looks and personality are important, if you can’t take the time to write a proper sentence rather than “Id luv 2 txt u on my…” then I’ll take a pass thanks.

      And as a post script, I am a tall, non-smoker with a good sense of humour and generally no need for a dictionary. If you’re interested…

    • Jim says:

      07:57am | 15/09/10

      So…instead of saying “Lexie C is fkn HOT!!!”, I should say “Alexandra Carlton has the most captivating smile and beautiful eyes I have ever seen.” Yes?

    • peeb says:

      08:05am | 15/09/10

      Wonderful Alex!  Now if only people would stop using apostrophe s to indicate a plural.  Arrrrgh!

    • Steve says:

      08:17am | 15/09/10

      I must show my 15 year old daughter this article who has her head down in Facebook for the majority of her free time,  too many ‘best friends’ to be able to actually spell correctly or structure a sentence so that it flows and makes sense. When she puts her mind to it and takes the time she is a fantastic little scribe which is why she is planning to study journalism in a couple years and then work for an oversea’s aid agency after graduating. I hope she learns patience whilst writing,

    • Sarah says:

      11:06am | 15/09/10

      Work for a WHAT aid agency?!

    • CBD says:

      09:15am | 15/09/10

      Can we lift the bar for journos too?
      If I hear one more “reporter” say “..over two hundred demonstrators gathered..”
      What happened to ...more than…?

    • Chinaski says:

      11:52am | 15/09/10

      My editor always tells me you can’t go physically “over” a number, so why would you write it like you could? A similar example is how you can’t be “around” numbers. Hence, I write everything as “about” or “more than”. You could even just say “200 demonstrators gathered…”
      However, at the end of the day the subs will still change everything!

    • Jones says:

      05:30pm | 15/09/10

      You know, my favourite journalistic pet peeve is in sports reporting.  “Australia have gained the lead.”  No!  No, no, no, no, NO!  Australia HAS gained the lead.  It’s ONE team!

      Sure, if you change it up a bit and say, “The Australians have gained the lead,” that’s fine.  There are many Australians in the Australian team.

      But Australia HAS gained the lead!  Singular!  It really irks me.

    • rick says:

      09:29am | 15/09/10

      Nothing sets me off more than reading sentences like “(so and so) SHOULD OF (done this or that)” Seriously, am I missing something here due to english being my second language? I suppose those ignorants mean “SHOULD HAVE” but their auditive perception of the verbal form “sould’ve” makes them register - and then write - “should of”. Seriously, how ignorant do you have to be to think that ‘should of’ makes any sense at all?

      On the other hand, I don’t know if our (correct) way of writing (for those feeling sympathetic with the article) will be considered ignorant in some time: My brother wrote me an email the other day. In spanish, where sentences are usually longer and therefore in more need of punctuation signs. His comas were all over the place, but again, nowhere in place. An email full of the spanish equivalent expressions to LOL… Is it us who are staying behind? God forbid…

    • Chinaski says:

      12:04pm | 15/09/10

      When I see people (usually on Facebook) write “should of”, I die a little on the inside. I could jump on the site now and provide more examples of crimes against the English language, but alas work is calling.

      One that always sticks in my mind is “onli”. Yes, “only” spelt with an “i”. It only takes slight move of the finger to spell the word correctly, but for some reason I fear I’ll never understand people (mainly vacuous-looking girls) decide to announce their illiteracy to the world. The only explanation I can think of is that it sounds or looks “cute”?

    • Eats, shoots and leaves says:

      06:06pm | 15/09/10

      AGREED! 

      My other bugbear (often written by the same special people who write “should of”) is where the word “being” is replaced by “been”. 

      For example: “Sam is been stupid”. 

      Don’t get me started on apostrophes (or apostrophe’s wink It’s not that hard people!

      Then there’s the word to/two/too - how can friends of mine who completed 12 years of school in Australia continually update their Facebook status to say they are “to cold” or “to tired”?  It’s depressing.

    • Secular Saint says:

      09:07pm | 15/09/10

      I hope your brother recovers from his comas and that he will then remember to properly use of his commas.

    • Jhamiltonwa says:

      09:49am | 15/09/10

      Peeb, meet Steve.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      10:00am | 15/09/10

      R U SRS? OMG, ROFL, AFK…....

    • Matthew says:

      04:24pm | 15/09/10

      OMG, ROFL and AFK are all acronyms which makes them correct in the English language.  I’m definitely not an expert in the English language so feel free to correct me if I’m wrong though.

    • Isle Bee says:

      10:13am | 15/09/10

      I failed (and hated) English with honours but I would still back myself against younger people today. I’ve had many bad experiences with email exchanges (courting) where my lack of usage of commas and full stops has turned the whole meaning of the email (I’m probably doing it now) therefore costing me dearly in the courting stakes wink

    • fairsfair says:

      10:42am | 15/09/10

      I don’t think choice of words is so much of an issue, it is just grammar and basic spelling. If someone can spell you seem to think they are generally more intelligent than someone who spells phonetically.

      Also, in world where we are trying to fire off messages quickly (like posting on a website before your tea break finishes), someone who takes the time to actually write correctly conveys to you that you are worth that little bit extra. Though not in the online dating world - that is how I would interpret it. If you can’t take the time to fill in your profile and communicate yourself in an effective way - what kind of person are you? Probably lovely…. but anyway….

    • Laura says:

      10:54am | 15/09/10

      I try not to be a snob about these things, but you’re right. Basic written communication skills can really make a difference when looking for love online. As soon as I see a profile littered with spelling mistakes, lacking punctuation and embracing a fair amount of ‘text speak’ I find myself completely turned off. I’m not looking for perfection, but are the basics really so hard to grasp?

      I don’t need them to come out with witty one liners. “Morning darling, get to work ok?” is poetry compared to the barely comprehensible comments that some people come out with. Is it really more efficient to constantly replace letters with numbers, and use text speak? It certainly takes me a lot longer to decipher what they’re trying to say. And for the love of Dog, please use punctuation! Reading a profile with no commas or full stops is like running a sprint! At the end you’re gasping for breath.

    • NEFFA says:

      11:40am | 15/09/10

      Why try not to be a snob? embrace it.
      This is the written equivalent of having your first date at Maccas. It’s lazy and shows a complete lack of care factor.

      If someone didn’t care enough to write a coherent on-line profile, or to send me a well constructed introduction, i will instantly delete.

    • Shane says:

      10:57am | 15/09/10

      My pet peeve is “I could care less” when the writer is attempting to indicate their disinterest.  Please, people!  The phrase is “I couldn’t care less”!!!  As in, you care so little that you couldn’t possibly care less if you tried. 

      Dunno about this twitter claptrap, though.  You say there’s actually stuff on there that’s worth reading?

    • Johanna says:

      01:17pm | 15/09/10

      Shane, I suspect that you mean ‘lack of interest’. 

      As politicians and journalists can attest,  critical comments about spelling /grammar are perilous, as they almost always contain at least one error.

    • Secular Saint says:

      09:16pm | 15/09/10

      Now that would be uninterested.
      It is not the same as disinterested as in a good judge should be disinterested in an interesting case.

    • Zeta says:

      11:25am | 15/09/10

      Grammar and spelling sexy? Grammar and spelling is for sexless nerds and talentless lady boys.

      My spelling, syntax and grammar are rubbish and I bleed raw literary sex appeal out my brain hole - I mean, look at that, what the hell even is that? That dash. I put those everywhere. For no good reason. I just like it. And you can’t stop me. That’s sexy right there. Sometimes I just mix it up; throw in a semi-colon. What are you going to do about? I don’t even know what they’re supposed to do! What even is a semi-colon? It’s ridiculous - y’all just throw a dash in there instead. Dashes can save the world.

      Grammar and spelling is just another method of control.  You got great earth shattering ideas in your head but the Establishment wants you to try and jam them between full stops and capital letters.

      People need to let go of these antiquated notions of what constitutes good writing, because there is better writing scrawled on toilet walls than in a lot of newspapers / See what I did there? F*** the grammar nazis / just use forward slashes and write everything like it’s a song lyric scrawled in the back of some school kid’s text book / Forward slashes are for lovers.

      Great writers say no to rules. Allen Ginsberg didn’t need rules when he wrote ‘I’m with you in Rockland where we wake up electrified out of the coma by our own souls’ airplanes roaring over the roof they’ve come to drop angelic bombs the hospital illuminates itself imaginary walls col-lapse O skinny legions run outside O starry spangled shock of mercy the eternal war is here O victory forget your underwear we’re free’ and neither do you.

      It’s not how you say it, it’s what you say. And all the spelling and grammar in the world won’t save you if you’re boring.

    • bobw says:

      11:41am | 15/09/10

      Love it, Zeta.

    • John L says:

      12:01pm | 15/09/10

      Point taken. But even exciting concepts need to be expressed properly!

    • bella starkey says:

      12:05pm | 15/09/10

      I know many editors who own many cats. I put the high level of cat ownership in the literary editorial staff demographic down to thier incessant obsessions over the age old em dash/en dash dilemma.

      Grammar isn’t sexy, grammar kills.

    • Scarneck says:

      01:40pm | 15/09/10

      Very clever Zeta / lovely work - cheers

    • Eric says:

      03:41pm | 15/09/10

      Excellent grammar and spelling there, Zeta.

    • Katie says:

      04:15pm | 15/09/10

      Very amusing, but I’ll bring the learning on ya’ll because too much of society celebrates ignorance as genius.
      A dash is a punctuation mark, while it looks like a hyphen dashes serve two purposes; for each purpose there is a different type of dash.
      The most common versions of the dash are the en dash (-) and the em dash (—) .
      The em dash demarcates an interpolation or thought. (I collected the mail—not the magazines—and hurried inside.)
      The en dash is for denoting something occurred between the two written dates. (July-September.)
      If you don’t think this is sexy then you’re a liar, just say “em dash” and tell me you don’t like the way your lips dance around that!

    • Alexandra Carlton says:

      05:19pm | 15/09/10

      I’m too dazzled by your perfect spelling and grammar to pay attention to anything you said.

    • TC says:

      09:27pm | 15/09/10

      Your all loosers.

    • Brooke says:

      11:28am | 15/09/10

      Words, especially good ones, are terribly sexy…

    • Nicole says:

      11:30am | 15/09/10

      What I would like to know is when did ‘then’ replace ‘than’? Now that’s infuriating !

    • Daniel says:

      12:28pm | 15/09/10

      My god, I am far from perfect but this mistake infuriates me. I makes me want to send a grammar Nazi message every time.

    • Redvixen says:

      12:52pm | 15/09/10

      I thought this particular peeve was just mine! 

      And the other one - to “try and do something”.  No! You try TO do something.  And this particular error is in so much literature today written by some very popular authors.  Were their editors asleep on the job?

    • Chinaski says:

      12:07pm | 15/09/10

      Many girls have commented on my rather large, weighty dictionary.

    • go their says:

      12:51pm | 15/09/10

      their, they’re and there are all different words- they want to be your friends too

    • Judas says:

      12:51pm | 15/09/10

      The thing that sends me into conniptions of visceral rage, is the abuse and misuse of possessive adjectives.

      Your versus you’re.

      Being involved in the wonderful world of “online dating”; I have learned that by filtering out both the aforementioned literary sin, along with text speak and Internet acronyms, that I have been able to significantly decrease disappointment when the virtual world gives way to the real one.

      “Your cute wanna hook up” is an example of some of the finely crafted missives that one receives.

      For my own amusement, I would often reply explaining that I was perplexed, that I did not own “cute”. This only lead to confusion however, so I ceased.

      I have found that people who are able to refrain from laziness in the written word tend to be more attentive to other areas of their lives as well; for example, personal hygiene.

      This is something that I have, sadly, had to personally experience.

      Be warned people, if someone is texting or emailing you, using conglomerations of vowels and consonants such as “ur,lol,2,c,8” - it is likely that they aren’t all that concerned about bathing daily.

      That is my rant - don’t get me started on that disgraceful portmanteau “blog”.

      This fellow echoes my thoughts quite succinctly:

      http://www.ravenparadox.com/index.php/diatribe/this-is-not-a-blog-in-fact-none-of-them-are/

    • martin says:

      12:57pm | 15/09/10

      I just like people to know their there’s, they’res and theirs. I’m tall with a GSOH but I smoke like a bastard so I guess I’m screwed.

      But to take it as far as you want don’t you find it all rather turgid?

    • NEFFA says:

      01:14pm | 15/09/10

      HAHAHHAHAHHA - I like it.

    • Gregg says:

      01:43pm | 15/09/10

      It’s OK to make typos isn’t it?
      You really lie awake at night Alex subscribing to texting!

    • Alexandra Carlton says:

      05:36pm | 15/09/10

      *shamed* Yes.

    • wordsbyh says:

      02:03pm | 15/09/10

      Hear Hear!!!
      And apostrophes. Learn how to use them people!

    • Aitch B says:

      02:03pm | 15/09/10

      http://www.inappropriateuseofapostrophes.com

      Unfortunately it doesn’t exist….. wish it did!! However you should be presented with pages of links if you put it in your browser..

      Check out the signs at your local JB Hi Fi….. TV’s, CD’s, DVD’s, etc. etc.

      Aaaaaarrrrgggggghhhhhhhhh!!!

    • bella starkey says:

      03:22pm | 15/09/10

      You know what is really annoying?

      People who whinge about other people’s use of apostrophes but don’t realise that the apostrophe on your key board isn’t and is actually a single quotation mark and and apostrophe is really ’ (rather than ’ ) which can only be written by typing in alt0146.

    • Chuck says:

      04:27pm | 15/09/10

      Whoa bella, you just blew my mind.

    • Aitch B says:

      05:07pm | 15/09/10

      Nitpicker! smile

    • Relaxed says:

      03:30pm | 16/09/10

      “Ok, we’d had a few drinks. The idea of the letter ‘x’ plotting to bring about the demise of the letter ‘z’ struck us as unbearably funny. But I’d love it to happen.”
      I love this idea Alexandra smile
      ‘X’ has always struck me as being slightly shifty and I find your suspicions to be entirely justified.
      The second article is the counterweight to the first and I enjoyed reading it.  Thanks for the link.

    • Relaxed says:

      03:14pm | 15/09/10

      Having studied English I sort of agree with you all ... if it wasn’t for the fact I can tell that you all have little markers or pieces of chalk in your pockets so you can fix those irritating punctuation errors on shop windows or on signs outside of take away stores.
      Ever heard of an evolving language people?
      Many of the problems you are referring to are simply examples of the fact that in the middle of a pressure filled day it is simply not appropriate to stop and write a full sentence when a simple abbreviation will do.  Especially when these quick notes are only meant to be viewed by friends or family.
      If I’m texting a mate then ‘C U later’ conveys my meaning perfectly.  That doesn’t mean that I would write it in the same manner in formal setting.
      Facebook, twitter, texting are all informal mediums are they not?
      Wow ... relax people ;P

    • Alexandra Carlton says:

      05:29pm | 15/09/10

      I agree that language should evolve. In fact, I agree so vehemently that I wrote about it on another site a few years ago (with luck the mods won’t mind me posting it): http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2166611.htm

      I’m not particularly concerned when someone gets their spelling or grammar wrong. You’re right, it’s snobby and boring and there are better things to worry about.

      I just find it very sexy when people get it right.

    • Relaxed says:

      04:39pm | 16/09/10

      My reply is one space too far up.
      I was sure I had pressed the right button :(
      Just go and read Alexandra’s article and you will discover what I’m referring to.

    • K says:

      04:00pm | 15/09/10

      There. They’re. Their.
      -You’ll find it over there.
      -They’re on the way.
      -Their pocket is full.
      Please use the correct ‘there, they’re, their’ you’ll save countless grammar purists from eye haemorrhaging in disgust. 
      I’m not a rocket scientist or anything flash, but simple mistakes like that make folk look backwards and really stupid.
      I won’t discuss ‘to, too, two and 2’ because people should really know better.
      My hot tip is not to confuse wholly with holy.
      Abbreviations are what they are and they seem to want to stay. I don’t like them, but that is me personally.
      I’d never correct a menu or chalkboard; I mean; I could be wrong! That would rate right off the fox pass scale! (faux pas… See how silly you can look?!)

    • Matthew says:

      04:37pm | 15/09/10

      Maybe it’s just me, but don’t 2 and two have the exact same meaning?  Of course, I was taught that you should type a word out in full if it’s less than 10 but I don’t know how accurate that is.

    • Daniel says:

      04:22pm | 15/09/10

      Your just going to have to accept there use of Y-Gen language its better then coming across as a looser.

    • Richard says:

      05:42pm | 15/09/10

      There is a term for all you pompous gits writing comments today (except for the lovey Zeta, luminous as always): ‘literary luddites’.

      There is nothing more sexy to me than the intentional omission of as many vowels as possible from a text message/twitter update without compromising your target audience’s comprehension.

      I’m writing this comment on my phone while riding a bus, and let me tell you, I am really looking forward to the day we can do away with all these arduous spelling and grammer conventions for real.

    • Secular Saint says:

      09:28pm | 15/09/10

      Rarely is the word terrific is used correctly. Certain radio announcers repeatedly make this mistake.

    • Soos says:

      01:36am | 16/09/10

      @ Steve says:08:17am | 15/09/10

      ...I must show my 15 year old daughter this article who has her head down in Facebook ...why does the article have its head down in Facebook, and how do you know it’s a she?

    • talopine says:

      11:26pm | 16/09/10

      My phone doesn’t even think “practise” is a real word… So sad :(

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter