Australia has a desperate shortage of young people enrolling in science and maths at our schools and universities.

Without science we would never have sci-fi fans

Encouraging kids to embrace careers in science will be critical to Australia’s economic and social development.

Improving the scientific literacy of Australians – as well as the science savvy of business and political leaders - will also be crucial if our nation is to compete and prosper.

Let’s face it, science is now at the centre of virtually every important aspect of our lives and, indeed, at the heart of many of the most troubling decisions facing national and state parliaments.

In the last few years, governments have had to deal with scientific issues as varied as stem cell research, tackling climate change, bio-security (including how we handle pandemics), GM crops, and the science of rivers and water security.

Australia has a rich history of scientific discovery and innovation.

In my own State, we had the Nobel Prize winning father and son team, William and Lawrence Bragg, and their work on X-ray crystallography that eventually led to the discovery of DNA.

We had Lord Florey and his Nobel Prize for work developing penicillin that has saved countless lives.

There was Mawson and his work in Antarctica, and his geological mapping that helps to underpin our current mining boom.

There was Oliphant in the development of nuclear power and Basil Hetzel, one of our greatest living Australians, whose work in promoting the iodising of salt has improved the lives of hundreds of millions of people in developing countries.

But celebrating science excellence must be as much about the future as the past.

Early next month, the Duke of Kent will open Australia’s “Science Exchange” in Adelaide, which will promote science nationally to young people and the wider community.

It is funded by the Federal and South Australian Governments, with generous support from business, particularly from gas giant, Santos.

The Science Exchange, or more formally known as The Royal Institution Australia, is based on - and linked to - the world-renowned Royal Institution in London, which has been democratising science for more than 200 years.

The RI’s leadership has ranged from Sir Joseph Banks and Michael Faraday, through to Adelaide’s Braggs and its current director, Baroness Professor Susan Greenfield.

Its scientists have been awarded a total of 14 Nobel Prizes, and 10 of the chemical elements were discovered in its famous Albemarle Street research laboratory in the heart of London.

Susan Greenfield was one of Adelaide’s first Thinkers in Residence, and a series of science projects have been successfully distilled from her residency.

Her ‘Science Outside the Square’ events have drawn thousands of people, ranging from young people who flocked to her ‘Science in the Pub’ series, to the mass audience whose attention she captivated while discussing the science of sport during the half-time break of an AFL match at AAMI Stadium.

The Royal Institution Australia (RiAus) will be based at Adelaide’s historic Stock Exchange building, which has been refurbished to former glory, and at the same time turned into a high-tech centre linked to the media and to London, to enable international debates on current global science issues.

Like its British counterpart, the goal of RiAus will be to bring science to the people, and people to science.

Importantly, the Australian Science Media Centre (AusSMC) will be based there.

Each day, newspapers, electronic and web-based media report science issues.

Through the AusSMC, hundreds of Australian journalists can have on-line access to interview 3,000 Australian scientists.

When big science stories break – such as the outbreak of swine flu - the AusSMC can put journalists in touch with science’s best and brightest.

These are experts in their fields, as opposed to unqualified interest group lobbyists.

Thousands of media reports have already been generated, and the fiercely independent AusSMC has the support of major media and scientific organisations, as well as our universities.

Bringing the RI to Adelaide dovetails neatly with our University City push.

Carnegie Mellon, one of the top universities in the United States, became the first institution to offer US-accredited Masters degrees here when it opened its campus in the heart of Adelaide.

Cranfield, Britain’s defence industry university, has set up an office here.

We are also now home to a campus of University College London, which is ranked seventh on the list of the world’s top 10 universities compiled by The Times Higher Education Supplement.

For the first time, it will offer a degree program outside of Britain and - like the RI - University College London has chosen Adelaide as the place to establish its historic first-ever overseas presence.

These world-class institutions complement the scientific enterprise and excellence that is nurtured within our existing universities, schools and research organisations, such as Waite (leading innovation in agriculture and wine), our new $13 million BioSA science and technology Incubator at Thebarton, and our Defence Science and Technology Organisation installation.

What we need to do now is take science out of the lab, and bring it into the lounge room.

The aim is to make science as appealing and engaging as a night at the cinema, or an afternoon at the football.

Most commented

12 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Paul says:

      06:28am | 28/09/09

      Mike I was happy to get a great education in environmental science and to work on some of Australia’s leading projects. However, I realised that despite the natural genius and cherry-picked examples above, at the coalface of science we are mostly a hillbilly nation that trades on some heroic myths. For instance, you love to talk big and global but state bureaucrats like you, slowly killed the Murray Darling river system with scientific precision and focus. World class anti-science and anti-economics I’d say! And now you want to tackle the larger, gnarlier issue of climate change? Who are you fooling Mike? My advice is, study science but work overseas - they will pay you properly and value you there.

    • harry says:

      07:33am | 28/09/09

      I see the mighty mouth is jumping on others successes again. Me smells an election after which, science won’t get a mention.

    • Dwest says:

      09:43am | 28/09/09

      Considering you can’t even scientifically clean up your nuclear waste and radioactive dust in SA, what’s sci fi about SA… More like a fantasy… (?) You are so 1960ing on nuclear science and waste management.

      The brain drain must have nearly finished down south.

    • Jim Fletcher says:

      11:31am | 28/09/09

      Science is too important to leave in the lab.
      Regrettably not too much science has found it’s way into the thinking of the Rann government, and when we look at some ‘investments’ in renewable energy with published returns of less than 1%, much the same can be said for economics.

    • Terry Wright says:

      11:39am | 28/09/09

      The mind boggles at the hypocrisy. I am just dumbfounded how Mike Rann can claim credit for using science in policy decisions. If any state is guilty of ignoring science and evidence for personal ideology and political posturing, it’s SA. The recent changes to drug laws is SA has seen politicians (including Rann) openly mocked science and evidence and completely ignore the latest medical research.

      Does anyone remember Attorney General, Michael Atkinson in 2008 hammering Sandra Kanck’s suggestion to trial MDMA(ecstasy) for post-traumatic stress syndrome(PTSS)? Although it was recommended by medical experts in Israel and the US who had already had excellent results, Atkinson said, the Government would “not be supporting Sandra Kanck’s latest rave” and “Vietnam Veterans are not laboratory mice for a left-wing social experiment”. Ironically it has now taken up by Canada,

      What about ban on drug paraphernalia introduced by Anne Bressington? It received full support of the SA government although there was no evidence whatsoever that it would reduce drug use. There was however, plenty of scientific evidence that it would greatly increase harm. When pointed out to them, it was laughed off.

      The most damning example of tossing out science in favour of political and personal opinion were the orders by the SA government to shut down pill testing units at dance parties. Several doctors and nurses including drug expert Dr David Caldicott had voluntarily manned pill testing booths to inform users of exactly what they were taking. Many users simply ditched their pills when they discovered the ingredients whilst others agreed to counselling. Worldwide research has shown that pill testing saves lives and reduces drug consumption but the SA government again completely ignored the evidence. Incredible!

      These are some of Labor’s new laws that defy scientific research:
      -Increasing to life imprisonment the maximum penalty for the trafficking, manufacture or cultivation of commercial quantities of illicit drugs.
      -Trebling the expiation penalties for possession of cannabis.
      -Banning the sale of drug paraphernalia.
      -Introduced the Hydroponics Industry Control Bill to crackdown on the cultivation of hydroponically-grown cannabis.

      Every new law above has been scientifically proven several times NOT to reduce drug use. They have been proven though to increase harm and deaths. It seems that politicians have forgotten that the public can now check their claims on the internet.

      In a nutshell, SA’s drug policy is completely void of scientific evidence and medical research. Nearly every single drug related comment and drug policy decision by the current Labor government is based on anything but science. To claim that they are science savvy in their decision making is simply outrageous and sadly their agenda will continue to reek havoc on society.

    • sam says:

      11:43am | 28/09/09

      “Australia has a desperate shortage of young people enrolling in science and maths at our schools and universities.”

      I keep hearing comments like this, but theres no evidence of a lack of scientists. Scientists are consistently underpaid and undervalued - after around 10 years of ‘training’ (undergraduate degree, honours, PhD), a scientist emerges into an Australia where funding is increasingly scarce and jobs pay about the same as any other entry-level employee would get. The only worthwhile money is in europe.
      If there is truly a lack of scientists, wouldnt the market drive wages up? Seems that the lack of scientists is a myth, or there is a lack of value put on science.

    • stephen says:

      12:10pm | 28/09/09

      Hate to say it, but pay’em more.

    • MF says:

      12:23pm | 28/09/09

      Mike, I have a PhD in “Science”.  I spent 8 years at university doing my BSc (Hons) and then a PhD.  Yet I struggle to find a job doing what I’m trained to do.  There is a lack of adequate funding for scientific research in Australia and then our government wonders why our “best and brightest” continually leave our shores and head overseas, contributing to the brain drain.  It’s not that those working in science are “underpaid”, it’s the fact that they’re not getting jobs in science in the first place, because nobody here has any real interest in funding it.  I know far too many science PhD’s who have ended up working well outside their field due to lack of funding and job opportunities in Australia.  Or they’ve gone overseas.

      I assure you that Australia produces plenty of scientists, but until government and industry wake up and realise the problem (despite our constant pandering for more funding), then nothing is going to change.  The Australian Research Council is one of the most overly bureaucratic, politically motivated organisations around.  And they’re the ones making decisions on what scientific research gets funded.  They’re a joke, and everyone at the upper echelons of science knows it.

    • Cameron Price-Austin says:

      01:19pm | 28/09/09

      Your government supports science? Because last I checked, your Attorney General was a fundamentalist luddite who, despite evidence that an R18 rating for video games would protect children from harm, steadfastly refuses to even debate the issue.

      I hope you lose the next election Mike. You and your team have forgotten who you work for.

    • yornup says:

      01:39pm | 28/09/09

      MF, I can empathise with your position all too well. After finishing my PhD in September last year, I then underwent a soul-destroying 8 month’s trying to find a postdoc position, even relocating from Perth to the larger scientific centre of Melbourne in an effort to aid my search, only to find out that while more scientific research is undertaken in Melbourne, there are also a whole lot more people trying to fill the scarce number of positions available. After several interviews and innumerable applications I eventually stumbled across a postdoc position through a former supervisor. However due to funding issues I am only on a casual contract at the end of the year, finding myself reliant on future successful grant and fellowship applications as to whether I will still be employed come January 1. From my point of view it isn’t that there are too few good scientists, but too few positions available. The vast majority of those that I undertook my PhD alongside are now working in positions far removed from what they are actually trained in, or if they are still in science, they have taken up positions overseas. So naturally it all comes back to the government-of-the-day’s willingness to invest in research and development so that Australia does not get left behind.

    • MF says:

      01:55pm | 28/09/09

      @yornup - Yeah, I know how it goes.  I was lucky enough to find a postdoc straight out of my PhD (which is entirely industry funded - and they can pull the plug at any minute should their finances turn sour), but at the same time, I know some who’ve been job hunting for over 2 years.  That you managed to find something within 8 months is actually quite impressive to be honest.  Almost all postdocs are employed casually, that’s nothing novel.  Everyone doing a PhD knows that it’s no guarantee of getting the job you want in the place you want (or everyone *should* know that), but I’ve had to watch too many of my friends just ditch scientific research entirely and go into mediocre jobs due to lack of job opportunities within their field.

      And that has a flow on effect to the younger generations.  If nobody is employing scientists to work on cutting edge research, and they’re not being employed as university lecturers (because the baby boomers are already retiring and not being replaced), then they’re not passing on that new knowledge to the upcoming university students, who are the ones that high school kids look to for advice on what to study…

    • Max Bolton says:

      10:58pm | 28/09/09

      It’s bit rich for Mike Rann to be lecturing us on the benefits of science being used in policy decisions. All his policy decisions are based on what he thinks will win him the most votes at the next election. Science doesnt even enter into it!
      I’d like to know why Mike Rann blocks people from following him on Twitter who make any kind of negative comment? I was banned after making a comment about Media Mike being a Port fan, but quickly jumping on the Crows bandwagon for populist purposes (since Port didnt make the finals).
      In 1 of your earlier Punch articles, Mike, you talked at length about Twitter.
      You wrote this.. “I guess I could vet those who follow me on Twitter. But that would be like employing a bouncer, or a censor, at my street corner meetings”.
      You also talked about “feedback being healthy in a democracy”.
      Mike, it’s time you stopped being hypocritical and stop blocking those people who are straight-up and honest with, sometimes, negative feedback and criticisms. You need to realise that not everyone wants to constantly stroke your ego with warm fuzzies and compliments. You need to listen to criticism and embrace it. Perhaps use it to become better at what you do, rather than arrogantly dismissing it and ignoring it.
      So what’s it all about Mike? Why cant you handle criticism?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter