More than 90 per cent of people who finish Snooki’s book A Shore Thing reportedly Google the phrase: “If I hold my breath for 45 seconds while repeatedly head-butting a wall, will I get amnesia?”

Snooki: the vacuous face of modern celebrity.

A more pressing question for many of you, however, is probably “who or what is a Snooki?”

Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi is the result of an innovative reality television show called Jersey Shore which places a bunch of potential sexual harassment lawsuits in a house in New Jersey and leaves them to enjoy some good ol’ fashioned ‘roid rage, borderline alcoholism and painful acronym-inventing (eg. DTF).

She’s what you would get if you took the most obnoxious X-Factor hopeful ever and locked them in a tanning salon with a crate of cheap vodka and a Ke$ha “album”.

Snooki is the poster girl for people who are famous just for believing it’s their MTV-given right to be famous. She is adored by a legion of loyal fans who study her every move with the hope that they too can earn ridiculous sums of money for doing nothing particularly noteworthy. In his book (yes, another one), her esteemed colleague Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino responds to various haters and “jealous” detractors with “it’s been a lot longer than 15 minutes”.

Socialite Kim Kardashian probably agrees with The Sitch. Kim’s key achievements to date include endorsing a shonky credit card and getting sued for reneging on contractual obligations relating to said credit card after the American public realised it was shonky.

The Jersey Shore crew and the Kardashians are the worst possible role models for youth. I’m not talking about that wowsery “they’ll make six-year-olds wear mini skirts and drink Baccardi” crap. I’m talking about the way they encourage the idea that no one really needs to try to excel at anything anymore as we’re all special flowers who deserve to be rich and famous just because. These smug moneybags mistakenly think they’ve made generations of entrepreneurs and diligent workers look like suckers.

I realise it’s become especially uncool to praise the guy lately, but Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is something of a role model for my generation.

Whatever your opinion of Zuckerberg and his social network, you have to admit the man’s undeniably self-made. He may very well turn out to be a dotcom tyrant some day with 600 million identities at his disposal, but you can’t deny his work ethic. Men and women like Zuckerberg know that the world doesn’t owe you a living. It begrudgingly grants you an existence and dares you to do something with it.

While most billionaires buy up small islands and country manors to set up home offices in, Zuckerberg found himself a pad closer to Facebook headquarters. He’s got enough cash to buy half of New York, turn it into frat houses and then into pool rooms, but he still shows up for work each day.

Nobody deserves to be successful until they actually are. If you really want respect, you’ll spend 10 hours a day at your desk, your guitar, your studio, or your workshop until you get it.

Fashions change, artists die and pages yellow, but humility, focus and a strong work ethic will always be the key to enjoying a genuinely rewarding life. Because unbeknownst to The Sitch, the average person lives a lot longer than 15 minutes.

Most commented

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • S.L says:

      05:05am | 03/03/11

      I know nothing about Mark Zuckerberg outside of Facebook and the fact he attended Harvard (which means he had a more of a leg up than most of us!) but in my view good luck to him. He had an idea and ran with it. I believe Bill Gates started Microsoft courtesy of a 7 figure inheritance from his grandfather. He didn’t just sit on his fat backside either!
      I remember when they were auditioning for the first series of Big Brother here. The stunts people would do for their 15 minutes of fame? I remember one guy streaked through a shopping center!  Remember the girl with the bunny ears and the bum dance? Well I remember those but not her name.
      One name I do remember though who’s attached to someone famous for achieving nothing….........Danni Monogue.

    • Gerard says:

      08:06pm | 03/03/11

      Yes, Big Brother…what I really love about that show is that practically none of the housemates would have known who Big Brother actually was.

    • RT says:

      07:16am | 03/03/11

      Well said.

      Sad part of these Jersey Shore types is that they do not realise that they are only really famous because people like to have someone to make fun of.

      Making fun of these clowns brings people together. I don’t know anyone that watches the show, but they all know it as the show that has the douchebag guidos.

    • Dave Sag says:

      07:30am | 03/03/11

      Yet another reason not to watch free to air TV.  Kids these days (etc etc).

    • Tim says:

      08:13am | 03/03/11

      Um Jersey Shore is actually on Foxtel.

    • Geoff - Brisbane says:

      08:38am | 03/03/11

      Actually it’s a reason to cancel your foxtel subscription, (MTV is on pay TV) since this is the sort of crap you are paying for.

    • dex says:

      07:36am | 03/03/11

      Well when the media squirts sex, consumerism, body image and celebrity lifestyle down young peoples throats, eventually they’re going to start swallowing it. Its easy to take aim at the “stars” of the show, but perhaps you could dig a little deeper and find out WHY they’re popular. If nobody watched Jersey Shore, they wouldnt be famous. Maybe its a reflection of society, rather than a few individuals. And like it or not, a large proportion of our young generation like to go out, hook up and find out whos DTF.

    • iMitchy says:

      03:09pm | 03/03/11

      @dex,
      Whilst I agree with what you are saying in general, parts of that first sentence make me feel uneasy…

    • Samson says:

      09:24am | 03/03/11

      But Jason how many people watch that show because they actually respect and hope to emulate its protagonists?  I get the feeling that its main appeal is as a kind of disaster show, where people get some kind of enjoyment out of watching these train wrecks fail their way through life.

      You say that Snooki has legions of loyal fans, but what numbers are we talking about here?  A couple of hundred spread across a handful of internet sites?  Out of an audience of more than a billion worldwide that has access to MTV?

    • matt says:

      09:34am | 03/03/11

      It’s T-Shirt tiiiiiiiimmmmmmeeeeeee!

    • Don Homer says:

      10:28am | 03/03/11

      The fact that both Sarah Palin and Snooki have best selling books in America is a pretty clear indication that the US is screwed.

      p.s. caybs are here! caybs are here!

    • stephen says:

      03:39pm | 03/03/11

      Maybe the smart people in America are reading everyone else’s books.
      Isn’t this what the internet is for ?

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      11:32am | 03/03/11

      You missed out an important middle part Jason Tin.  I’ll insert it in italics for you.

      “I’m talking about the way they encourage the idea that no one really needs to try to excel at anything anymore as [the government will just redistribute most of your extra wealth gained to others so you might as well just slump to their mediocrity and pin your hopes on:] we’re all special flowers who deserve to be rich and famous just because.”

      Chicken and the egg Mate.  These kids aren’t stupid.  They can see where hard work returned for their parents - absolutely nowhere. Sticking your snout in the nanny state trough and carrying on like a celeb (fake it til you make it) has become a viable option.  That’s the moral hazard created by a heavy tax/levy/rates burden.

    • rufus says:

      12:00pm | 03/03/11

      Jason: ‘Nobody deserves to be successful until they actually are.’

      If someone does something they are paid handsomely for, and makes them famous enough for people in faraway lands to write something about them - whether complimentary or not - that’s success in today’s world.

      So you’ve contributed to the success of those you mention while at the same time, both decrying it and denying it. Bit of a convoluted position you’ve taken, there.

    • Andrew Martin says:

      01:19pm | 03/03/11

      This article ties in nicely with Brett Rutledge’s piece yesterday on idiots, which sums up the Kardashians and Snooki’s of this world (I had never heard of that Snooki thing until this article). 

      We should be using these dropkicks for our own national benefit though.  Have all Australian’s over the age of 18 complete a survey/census.  The first two questions should be along the lines of ‘who is your favourite Kardashian character?’ or ‘which season of Jersey Shore is your favourite?’  Anybody who actually fills in details relating to these people will be automatically removed from all voting obligations.  The rest of the survey can be pertaining to basic socio-economic understandings, so as to weed out the stupid who don’t have Pay TV.  Why would we want to continually cripple our nation by handing voting power to people who clearly do not understand what they are being asked to do?  Would you let a 3rd generation welfare-dependant from Claymore fly you to Europe on a new airbus?  Then why let the same derro make decisions based on your own livelihood.  Voting should be restricted to those who have been IQ tested (in a controlled environment, not on Eddie McGuire’s ‘National IQ test’), and their IQ is deemed to be over 110 or similar.  In this country we protect the stupid instead of restricting their influence and ability to f*ck up society.  Time to remove all the unnecessary safety labels and let the dumb kill themselves, and let natural selection be just that again.

    • Cody says:

      02:49pm | 03/03/11

      Yes, lets continue to support elitism and not educate the poor. Unfortunately the same intellectuals you speak of have over 100 years experience of continually voting in liberal and labor without giving thought as to why we only have a two party majority system.

    • Andrew Martin says:

      06:31pm | 03/03/11

      Well read sir.  I wasn’t using wealth or access to it as the separator, nice to see that you read what I said before jumping to conclusions.  There is a big difference between helping those who want to be helped and propping up those who don’t want to improve their station in life.  The ability to learn is at the modern man’s fingertips and costs near nothing, it seems that a large segment of society would rather spend that time watching oxygen thieves like the Kardashian’s and playing X-box that was bought with the baby bonus or unearned welfare payments.

      As for the two party system, well if you scanned back over our history you will see that there have been many different political parties over the years.  They always morph into the ‘big 2’ because of the basic ideological principles that are (supposedly) the premise of their membership.  This is a rough synopsis due to word limits, but people generally follow two lines of thinking.  The Labor Party was founded on the principles of protecting and supporting those who could not support themselves, and the Liberal Party was formed on the back of the ‘every man for themselves’ approach.  Unfortunately neither party subscribes to these theories any longer, instead made up of self-serving narcissists in the main.

      Cody, at the end of the day if you are happy to continue to support and provide an environment that allows for muppets like the title characters, then do not complain when the same type of idiot is making decisions that directly affect you one day.  Inaction and continually defending/protecting the stupid does nobody any favours in the long run.

    • Gerard says:

      07:52pm | 03/03/11

      Easier solution: make voting optional. That way, those who don’t care and the majority of those who don’t understand won’t be casting a vote which prevents those who do care and understand from influencing the result. Of course, it’ll never happen since the Labor/Liberal/National cartel with a stranglehold on power are the main beneficiaries of the current system.

    • stephen says:

      03:37pm | 03/03/11

      Another Capitalist rant - that we get what we deserve,( or rather, should) - and any reasonable person would have to agree with it.
      Labor Governments know, however, that we don’t always get ‘it’, and some others get more.
      Welfare is, then, a form of compensation.
      And there ain’t nothin wrong with that.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      03:40pm | 03/03/11

      Snooki is the one that got punched in the face right?....... hard to imagine why..

    • Grumpy says:

      05:14pm | 03/03/11

      These shows pay the characters alot of money. I read Lauren from the Hills made like $3million last year….the money talks.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter