There is a legend, whispered among only the maddest of souls, that under the glamorous, perfectly-tailored clothes of famous people are actual human bodies.

We'd show you the rest of this pic but meh, you wouldn't click anyway

“You fools,” they screech. “Why can’t you see that beneath the flowing gowns, industrial-strength hairspray and vodka stains there is flesh and blood and bone?”

And the rest of us laugh because we all know celebrities are simply floating heads atop designer outfits that are inflated with the taunts of seven-foot stage mothers.

Then, every so often, a nude photo leaks. Sometimes, it’s a bitter ex. Others, it’s some faceless, mischievous hacker. Then, of course, there are times when the subject of the photo is also the one launching it into the howling depths of the Internet like some sort of attention-seeking missile. And as the pictures bounce from site to site, followed closely by the stern warnings of legal reps, they are analysed and mocked and posted and re-posted.

Then, everyone gets bored. The flurry of pithy tweets stop, the snide remarks in comment sections and forums cease and the “celebrity” in question goes back to their regular, fully-clothed existence. We realise that just like most of us, they are firmer in places that are typically squishy and squishier in others that are usually firmer.

Late last week, walking nightclub decoration Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi - of Jersey Shore “fame” - became the latest to see her rude bits leap onto strangers’ laptop screens in a series of raunchy photos.

Her rep, whose job mainly consists of pretending her client isn’t a liquor-filled wrecking ball intent on reducing every social interaction to a mixture of tears, yelling and bizarre, grinding dance moves, has since confirmed the pictures were indeed of the pint-sized “celebrity”.

She was likely anticipating some sort of controversy or media frenzy. But Snooki was probably surprised to find, as others have noted, that hardly anyone seemed to care, with the most common reaction being a semi-muted yawn and a quick eye-roll.

Even the chatter and schoolyard giggling that accompanied the release of Blake Lively and Scarlett Johansson’s nude photos last year died down relatively quickly. Aside from the odd joke, the incidents have largely been forgotten by most.

Celebrity nudes are leaked so frequently, it seems, that they fail to garner attention anymore. In an age where anyone of any status is incessantly watched and streamed and captured, it’s almost accepted as an inevitability. And where once the icons who graced our screens and smiled from billboards were remote, mystical creatures - today, they are so relentlessly shoved toward us that it’s difficult to see them as anything but ordinary.

Unique, perhaps - talented, even - but ordinary, nonetheless. We see them shopping, tripping over furniture, nursing hangovers, feeding their children and crying in the aftermath of vicious break-ups. It’s not surprising, then, that we would eventually see them naked, too.

So, when we do see celebrities awkwardly posing in front of a mirror while clutching their phone or grinning suggestively at some unseen lover, it’s neither titillating nor scandalous. It’s mundane - almost comforting.

When the endless preening ceases and the glamour is stripped away, they become so very much like us - foolish, vulnerable, proud, self-conscious, embarrassed, exhilarated. Perhaps that’s why we seem to have lost our appetite for this particular brand of voyeurism.

There is, after all, nothing so boring as ourselves.

Most commented

35 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Emma says:

      06:23am | 14/06/12

      Hmmm but do we see them contribute something useful to society as well? I always have to chuckle when I see someone like Colin Farrell play some supersmart FBI agent, when in real life you wouldnt even be able to spell FBI. Maybe after a few Guiness…

    • Pedro says:

      08:42am | 14/06/12

      Err Emma - Guinness has an extra “n”. How ironic is this, given the subject matter of your post?

    • Emma says:

      09:39am | 14/06/12

      I dont drink beer. Forgive me, Pedro. And “Guinness” is more difficult to spell than FBI, after all it has more than double the letters!! smile

    • I, Claudia says:

      10:03am | 14/06/12

      And Farrell doesn’t work at the FBI, either. Also, I think that you wanted to put a semi-colon in your last sentence, Emma. It should’ve read:

      ...’‘is more difficult to spell than FBI; after all, it has more than double the letters!”

      You’re welcome, by the way.

    • Chris L says:

      12:35pm | 14/06/12

      Colin Farrell is expert at “playing dumb”. He is, after all, a comedian.

    • Scotchfinger says:

      01:16pm | 14/06/12

      @I, Claudia, you are frightening and mesmerising in equal measure.

    • bella starkey says:

      02:26pm | 14/06/12

      Chris I think you are confusing Will Ferrel for Colin Farrell

    • Chris L says:

      02:43pm | 14/06/12

      Oops! I am. Thanks Bella!

    • Harry Lime says:

      05:16pm | 14/06/12

      Chris, you forgot that Colin is an Irishman, say no MORE

    • Matchofbris says:

      10:10pm | 14/06/12

      @ Claudia - actually, no. I’d disagree. Semi colons separate two independent clauses, and the second clause there is directly related to the previous, due to the use of “after all”.

      “... than FBI. After all, it has…” would be correct. Those two sentences are too closely linked for a semi colon to be appropriate, and the comma, as you pointed out, is not really fitting either. There merely needs to be a full-stop induced pause.

    • Kronos says:

      06:56am | 14/06/12

      When the endless preening ceases and the glamour is stripped away, they become so very much like us - foolish, vulnerable, proud, self-conscious, embarrassed, exhilarated. Perhaps that’s why we seem to have lost our appetite for this particular brand of voyeurism.

      Or maybe people realise it’s the same product, in different packaging.

    • James Ricketson says:

      07:19am | 14/06/12

      Good one, Justin. With a bit of luck we heave entered the early days of the end of celebrity as we have come to know it. Perhaps we are ready to celebrate, emulate, men and women who actually achieve something substantial in their lives. I’m not holding my breath but we do live in strange times in which what seems impossible one year becomes reality the next and passe the year aftet that.

    • M says:

      07:51am | 14/06/12

      Let me know when nudes of Jessica Alba come up.

    • St. Michael says:

      12:03pm | 14/06/12

      You haven’t watched “Machete”, have you?

    • JN says:

      01:40pm | 14/06/12

      Machete - for Robert Rodriguez fans, quite possibly one of the most anticipated movies of all time after previous classics such as Planet Terror, Death Proof and Sin City. In the end it was quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen.

      Jason, I think you must have been neutered at birth you new age metro twat. If Scarlett Johanson or any other hotty for that matter wants to flash a bit of skin my way then I say bring it on.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:14pm | 14/06/12

      But, JN, Machete don’t text!

    • Condor says:

      03:19pm | 14/06/12

      JA wasn’t nude in Machete. It was all CGI

      Let me know when pictures of a naked Doetzen Kroes full-frontal show up.

      PS I will kill anyone that sends me the pictures of Snooki. No-ones wants to see that naked. Or clothed. Or breathing, for that matter.

    • Brizben says:

      04:30pm | 14/06/12

      If you go into the special features on the Machete DVD/BD and turn on the audience reaction audio track, I think it makes watching the movie a lot more fun. It is the closest I will get to going to a Film Festival full of Robert Rodriguez fans.

    • Katie says:

      08:38am | 14/06/12

      If you’re famous, or looking to get famous, but really would be ‘horrified’ if your nude turned up online, simple solution.

      Don’t take nude photos of yourself.

      I’m not sure why this is so difficult. Naturally it only applies to the real nudes, not the photoshopped ones, but just don’t save any naked photos onto your computer, or e-mail them.

      Duh?

    • miloinacup says:

      10:32am | 14/06/12

      I don’t see the issue with sending nude pictures of yourself - just don’t include your face in them! Or, if you have distinguishing marks/tattoos, strategically cover them up (if possible).

      I have a friend who I adore but who I have to shake my head at - she sent nude pictures of herself to a guy she was seeing. They had a messy break-up and he refused to delete the pictures. She made herself sick with worry, thinking he would put them on facebook or some equally public forum. Nothing came from it, but a few months later she did the exact same thing (nude pictures, face included) to a new bloke she was dating. My advice? Show your lady bits if you want, but DON’T SHOW YOUR FACE!

    • che says:

      12:20pm | 14/06/12

      I had a guy send me a full body naked wanking shot, face and everything on show. When that relationship went pear shaped due to his wandering penis (who would have guessed that would happen lol), oh it was so hard to not use those for evil purposes! But I resisted, I was quite proud of myself.

    • Greg says:

      08:54am | 14/06/12

      Maybe we’re not becoming better people. Maybe it’s just that, with the sudden surge in the amount of pic-taking smartphones and hackable cloud photo storage, we are seeing a lot more celebrity nudes than before. So, simply through supply and demand, the value of each becomes less. Plus, I suspect a lot more people would want to see Johansson in the buff than Snooki. I find these much more persuasive arguments than some vague theory that we’re finding a new maturity, or that celebrities are somehow losing their allure. There has been Hollywood gossip almost as long as there has been Hollywood. And there have been trashy overexposed celebrities alongside demure, goddessy ones for decades.

    • ibast says:

      09:25am | 14/06/12

      Gotta say Katy Perry actually looks better with clothes on.

    • Scotchfinger says:

      09:55am | 14/06/12

      I’ll have to take your word for that.

    • ibast says:

      10:59am | 14/06/12

      The interweb is your friend Scotchfinger.

    • che says:

      10:08am | 14/06/12

      Everyone has already seen all of Snooki’s bits (if you watch Jersey Shore she flashes them regularly). Plus, is nudity really that interesting or abnormal? We are all naked under our clothes.

    • Scotchfinger says:

      11:38am | 14/06/12

      I wish more women had your advanced viewpoint.
      Chimps don’t wear clothes, they look ridiculous wearing them.
      We are chimps, ergo we look ridiculous in clothes.
      Scarlett is an alpha female.
      Snooki is an upstart who would be beaten by Scarlett and left for dead on a forest clearing, covered by branches.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      10:12am | 14/06/12

      I’d have to say that I have a hell of a lot more interest in seeing Scarlett Johansson naked than Snooki.  To mention the two of them in the same article is nigh on blasphemy!

    • Muggles says:

      10:50am | 14/06/12

      What’s the point of this article? It sounds like just another scattershot whinge about modern life. Must be a very slow news day.

      You might be boring, but Scarlett’s ta-tas are not.

      I’m not a fan of celebrity culture, but if Miss Johansson’s dirty pillows are on display, then I’m clicking.

      And so is every other red blooded male. And quite possibly many women, hetero or otherwise.

      (And last time I checked, nobody is forcing you to click on a link…)

    • che says:

      12:15pm | 14/06/12

      I’m more of a Katy Perry fan as far as girl-crushes go.

      And well done on the use of ‘dirty pillows’ smile

    • Audra Blue says:

      12:35pm | 14/06/12

      I would totally jump the fence for Ms Scarlett!

    • Muggles says:

      10:52am | 14/06/12

      Celeb raunch culture is bad, but writing articles about it is good for ad-clicks.

      Is that how it works?

    • SydneyGirl says:

      11:16am | 14/06/12

      Muggles in one sentence you have summed up modern culture. Hat doff.

    • Meph says:

      11:43am | 14/06/12

      One could observe that the fantasy is usually better than the reality.

      Personally, I’d recommend anyone fantasising about Snooki to be either committed or lobotomised. There’s a special kind of hell reserved for oompa loompa fetishists, and people who talk in the theatre. (Apologies to Shepherd Book and Joss Whedon for bastardising the quote)

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter