It’s time that Mr. Rudd learned some manners.

Hey Kevin, Japan isn't ready to think so far ahead. Photo: Kym Smith.

Imagine, for a moment, that your house has caught fire. Imagine that some of your family members are still inside the house.

You are doing everything within your power to get them out, and to safety. At the same time, you know that some of your family members have already died.

You also know that many of the things – like photos – which connect you to those lost family members are going up in smoke.

You are exhausted. You can’t really remember back beyond the fire. It is impossible to think about the future. When you have a second or two to spare, you want to sit down and cry.

But you can’t. You have to brave the fire and get back in the house and try to save whatever – whomever – you can.

Now, imagine that at this very moment your next-door neighbour arrives and demands that you provide urgent briefings on the ashes and sparks that just happen to be flying from your house onto his roof. He is worried about his own house catching fire, and he wants to know what you are doing to prevent this.

What do you do? Do you grab the nearest thing at hand, and take a swing at your neighbor? Do you call your neighbour a long list of names, none of which are repeatable here? Or, do you simply turn your back on your neighbor, and get back to into your burning house to try and salvage what you can?

Right now, Japan’s house is ablaze. Through no fault of their own, many Japanese – many of the family members, if we are to continue the analogy – are dead. Many Japanese towns and everything in them – rooms in Japan’s house, as it were – have simply ceased to exist.

The Japanese government and the stoic Japanese people are doing everything they can to save those stuck beneath the rubble and among the wreckage.

The aftershocks – and there are many – are nerve-wracking. Everyone is exhausted. Life before the earthquake is but the dimmest of memories.

Nobody is thinking ahead. People want to sit down and cry. But they can’t. They have to get on with the job of saving people, and of saving whatever else is salvageable.

And, just to make things that much more difficult, the Japanese government must do something with a couple of nuclear reactors that – in the worst-case scenario – could raise the death toll by an almost unimaginable factor.

Now, into this nightmarish scenario steps Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd. He demands “urgent” briefings from Japan on the unfolding nuclear crisis.

Japan has made clear that it will keep the International Atomic Energy Agency fully apprised of the nuclear issue. Japan will, I guess, treat Rudd with a dignified silence.

That is more than he deserves. It is, by implication, more than Australia deserves.

This sorry episode reflects poorly on Australia. I, for one, extend my heartfelt and sincerest sympathies to Japan – a very great nation with which Australia should want to be on the best of terms.

123 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Sean Williams says:

      05:07am | 15/03/11

      From here in the UK I have for sometime observed this oddball with a kind of bewildered sense of awe. Australia is lucky that the world doesn’t pay it much attention. If it did then this man would be a major liability rather than the minor one he currently is. Mr Rudd’s recent displays, allied with your Prime Minister’s cringe-making performance in Washington, is for me the perfect example of how mediocrity can rise easily to the top Down Under. Aussies enjoy feeling smug and superior to what they believe is a still class-riddled Britain and think of themselves as a meritocracy. In truth Australia is a mediocracy. Rudd not only suffers from acute Greg Sheridan-itis (primary symptom: an inflated sense of Australia’s place in the world). He is also quite clearly a narcissist of the highest order. Did Australians think that President Obama cancelling his trip to meet him in Australia THREE TIMES a coincedence! I find it remarkable that the highly impressive British Foreign Minister William Hague - regarded as one of the best parliamentary brains in Westminster - has been under pressure of late for a slight mis-step in Libya. In contrast Rudd has been tearing round the world like an utter madman and is rewarded with rising poll ratings! To be fair, most of Mr Rudd’s big-noting is comic. But this rudeness to a devastated Japan is beyond the pale and brings shame on Australia. I fear it won’t be the last time you are embarrassed on the global stage by this strange little man.

    • Bris Jack says:

      05:38am | 15/03/11

      My name is Kevin and I’m here to help (myself)
      Sean,  good to hear your views from afar.

    • Charles Radford Bourke says:

      06:08am | 15/03/11

      Sean,  thanks.  We do not need input from Brittania thanks.  Back to abandoning Aussies at beaches,  changing billiards rules to suit yourselves and sitting back sipping tea.

      Perhaps you should just get back to trying to beat us at cricket and sorting out your own mess.
      tally ho

    • Tedd says:

      06:15am | 15/03/11

      Your comments about Rudd and the consequences of him are spot on.

      As far as “the highly impressive British Foreign Minister William Hague - regarded as one of the best parliamentary brains in Westminster” (who “has been under pressure of late for a slight mis-step in Libya”), that is a debatable proposition. 

      The common theme with these ‘mis-stepping’ politicians seems to be what is referred to on another of today’s Punch articles (by Kevin “Heritage” Donnelly) as “Anglo-Celtic heritage”, or was he just referring to Judeo-Christian heritage, or both. And David ‘fly-by’ Cameron.  Go get ‘em, cowboys (with apologies to Nth America’s mid-west heritage)

    • acotrel says:

      06:23am | 15/03/11

      @Sean You ain’t seen nothing yet!  Wait until the idiots vote Abbott into power!

    • KH says:

      06:37am | 15/03/11

      This from the country that will soon bring us King Charles and Queen Camilla.  When you don’t have any embarrassments walking the world stage, you can start pointing fingers at others.

    • KH says:

      06:38am | 15/03/11

      Also, I’ll remind you that we are a lot closer to the nuclear threat than you.  We have every right to worry about that.

    • walter says:

      06:53am | 15/03/11

      he is an A grade bombastic moron , goe’s to show how the niave young and uninformed sheepl of our country can be sucked well and truly in. Australia is truly lucky that the greater world pays no heed to this national embarassment ...... he was the closest shave we have had witha dictator !!!

    • Rosie says:

      07:42am | 15/03/11

      His email address;

      IamIamIamthegreatestmeisKevinRudd@.com.universe

      I am I am I am the greatest me is Kevin Rudd @. com.universe

    • Jade says:

      07:48am | 15/03/11

      Totally agree Sean,  I can see it, you can see it, the rest of the world can see it… most Aussies can’t.  This man is an embarrassment (as is Joolya Gizzard) and could not have been ruder. I don’t know who the hell he thinks he is honestly.

    • kerry says:

      07:56am | 15/03/11

      How can we be “embarrassed on the global stage” when “Australia is lucky that the world doesn’t pay it much attention”? Obviously didn’t achieve your O levels, Seano.

    • Chewy says:

      08:49am | 15/03/11

      I hereby nominate Sean Williams comment @ 5.07 am as a Nosebleed comment for the day.
      Pure Gold. Best comment I have read on the Punch in ages.

    • Drunk Guy says:

      09:52am | 15/03/11

      acotrel = Labor Troll

      When you grow up and the consequences of government have an affect on your day to day life you might just realise that you actually do need to change parties from time to time to stop the arrogance and make them compete for the job, something neither are doing right now, they are working for the parties not for the people, and it’s gormless troll’s like you insinuating voters are idiots if they exercise freedom of choice that are trying to influence the outcome in a deliberate manner. Give it a rest and comment on the topic for a change.

      And yes, Gillard is an embarrassment, and Rudd is worse, but hey, we voted them in.

    • PatC says:

      01:39pm | 15/03/11

      UK? UK? UK? I’ve heard that name somewhere…
      Ahhh… that’s right… it’s on that little island of the coast of France.

    • casba says:

      02:39pm | 15/03/11

      Excellent and spot on observations from afar, Sean. The sentiments you have stated reflect so much what the vast majority of thinking Australians feel and believe. Yet it just continues to worsen with each new “episode” from this inept and amateurish Labor Government.  The Prime MInister’s performance in the OVal Office with the football was so cringe worthy that I had to look away for fear that I was waking from a nightmare.  And then that voice assailed me and I knew it was not a nighmare, but stark reality.  Interestingly, last night on Q &A she made reference to her voice as being so trypically Australian in a girly kind of coquettish way.  I am Australian and I can assure you, I do not speak like that! Welcome to the reality of the current Australian political scene Sean.  Long may we say, “God save the Queen because noting will save the Prime Minister….” from herself!

    • Matthew says:

      02:52pm | 15/03/11

      Everyone in Australia knows that Kevin Rudd is not only an embarrassment but also does 10 times as much flying around (using tax payers money) as all the other foreign ministers in Australian history.

      The difference is we *are* reasonably big on the world stage when you consider our low population and relative isolation.  Unfortunately I think Kevin Rudd still forgets that that still only puts us halfway down the list in line with the scandnavian countries or maybe even as high up as italy/spain/france.

      Juliar and Kevin 747 are like Australia’s parents.  They embarrass you so much in the playground that no one wants to even talk to you anymore, let alone be your friend.

    • Stubby Cooler says:

      03:21pm | 15/03/11

      Nice one Sean. You’ve taken an article from an Australian criticising another Australian and expanded on the theme, and thought it necessary to tell us all how mediocre we are. Cheers for that.
      I’m guessing you won’t be visiting Australia soon?
      Why don’t you ask China how important Australia is?
      I’ll grant you Rudd may be an idiot. No, I am sure he is. As are most Aussies. But if you want to compare, we can always discuss the despicable behaviour of a certain British General with the same name as a current Foreign Minister during a rather large conflict some time ago, that cost a few thousand Australian lives regularly, as if they didn’t even matter. Our very mediocre country bled all over Europe to save your shitty, irrelevant remains of an empire and cold, ugly island.
      Please, in the most polite terms, piss off back to whatever part of your insignificant life you stepped out of.
      Cheers mate!

    • Paul C says:

      03:23pm | 15/03/11

      Yes Sean, Good Post, never thought I would say it, but I am agreeing with a pom.  When I saw Juliar Buzzard speaking in Congress, I thought she must have been applying for a job there - what a suck up.  I hope you are right about the world ignoring Rudd, because yes, he is truly embarrassing and a strange little man.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      06:29pm | 15/03/11

      Listen mate, there are an estimated 11,000 Australians in Japan and at the time of writing 180 missing. If you had relatives over there you would want Rudd to go in hard—as anyone would.
      By the way Hague may be one of the best brains in Westminister but unlike Rudd, he never made it to the top job.

    • Vote Kevin for Heaven CEO says:

      10:54pm | 15/03/11

      The Kevin is the second coming.
      That’s why he goes off half-cocked…. Ok?

      Insolent pommy.

    • Sean Williams says:

      02:51am | 16/03/11

      I would like to apologise if I gave the impression of bagging Australia, some of my words could have been better chosen. I lived in Australia for a year a decade ago and I do love the place, choosing to ignore the ever increasing vitriol that is directed at my homeland at any given opportunity as the work of an ignorant minority. I have retained a keen interest in Australian affairs and reserve my right to express my opinion, goodness knows Aussies are not averse to criticising all facets of Britain and the British. Although closer in political affiliation to Labor my belief is that, as one of the rare people from Britain who take an interest in Australian affairs, you are currently served at PM and FM level by a couple of political pygmies who would not last 5 seconds here or in many other countries. There may be some uncomfortable home truths but you can take that honestly-given opinion or leave it. But please know Stubby Cooler and Co, the pathetically predictable, historically inaccurate and, to someone whose grandfathers fought in WW2, downright offensive anti-British tirades do a greater dis-service to your country than Rudd’s bumblings ever could. Oh and as for PatC, yes haha I see what you did there, you pretended you had never heard of the UK, then realised you had but only vaguely as an island near France. That truly is genius, you should be employed as Australia’s Official Retorter to the Barmy Army!

    • catherine says:

      07:56pm | 16/03/11

      Slightly insulting, not worded sympathetically, but sadly mostly true, at least in regard to our leaders. Gillard makes me shudder with mortification every time she opens her mouth. Rudd was a grossly incompetent leader but at least he had some degree of integrity. Gillard lies through her teeth at every opportunity. Obama missing Aus three times was a blessing, we didn;t want the creep.

    • Andrew says:

      05:07am | 15/03/11

      All quite acceptable according to the Prime Minister to a gushing Tony Jones, audience and tweeters last night on Q and A last night.

    • ZSRenn says:

      05:51am | 15/03/11

      As It seems to be with Wayne Swann on an interview with Insiders reporter Barrie Cassidy

      I think it might be a case of Rudd big noting himself at the expense of his actually doing the right thing and under cabinet orders

    • Jackie says:

      10:07am | 15/03/11

      What a suck job that was on Q&A. Every time she was asked a question she would start with a giggle and a laugh with Jones joining in, and the majority of adoring audience members clapping. And your right about the tweets, even before she hardly had two words out of her mouth they started flowing, “great performance by Gillard” Complete contrast to Rudds experience. Well done ABC for making Gillards Q & A
      a pleasurable and easy experience for her.

    • James Ricketson says:

      05:15am | 15/03/11

      Beautifully written, Peter. An apt analogy. Rudd’s lack of empathy, except when there’s a camera around to record it, is a most unfortunate trait for a Foreign Minister to have at times such as this.

    • Robert Morrow says:

      04:35pm | 15/03/11

      I don’t like analogies as a rule. They tend to oversimplify the situation, and are a better representation of a particular political perspective than of the actual situation.

      It’s the same case here. The analogy here has glossed over a major detail provided in the very same article that was sourced to justify this infantile tirade against a man who’s just trying to do his job; namely the eleven thousand Australians in Tokyo who Rudd is responsible for providing consular assistance to.

      So shouldn’t this analogy be about a friend’s house on the other side of the suburb which has caught fire while hosting a sleepover at which your children were attending? Wouldn’t the “insensitive neighbour” in reality be more of a “concerned parent”? Yet Peter has not chosen to portray it this way. I smell a politically motivated football. For shame, Peter, this article smacks of grandstanding more than Rudd’s behaviour.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:03am | 15/03/11

      There are a significant group of Australians who voted for Rudd who believe they were victims of the ultimate con man ruddy aka ex-pm with millions aka the air hostie fighting ninja!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      There are many non-Australians who can’t believe we didn’t learn from the Rudd mistake and voted for Juliar Gilltard aka Rudd version 2.0

      Rudd is a ego maniac, coward who will bully those weaker than himself and jump around like a manic not on meds. He needs medical and psychological help.

      What a shameful behaviour from a small man.

    • acotrel says:

      06:36am | 15/03/11

      @ATM Go for the kill!  He is ‘dysfunctional’ like Abbott’s brain!

    • Tedd says:

      06:38am | 15/03/11

      The only thing that stopped the justifiable dumping of this rabble, for the Coalition, was the Coalition leader.  The pot was better then the pan.

    • Jade says:

      07:51am | 15/03/11

      +1…. I didn’t vote for either of them, which is the depressing part! We are stuck with Australia’s mistake until the next election…

    • Faery says:

      07:58am | 15/03/11

      If only there was any way that we could think voting for Abbot would be better.

      Why, Why, WHY wont the Coalition put up a leader we could be proud to vote for.

      As to Rudd and his perpetual social ineptitude maybe we should all start posting ideas on how to make the little man shut up and go away.

    • Jim says:

      08:02am | 15/03/11

      I’d disagree Ted, GetUp!‘s high court action allowing people to change address right up to a week the election and still enrol skewed the numbers (5000 people ‘moved’ to Parramatta just before the election), Labor reps going into nursing homes on polling day and telling people where to put the numbers, dead people voting, Labor reps at polling booths dressing up in the Liberal blue, handing out fake how to vote cards, unions telling their members how to vote, branch stacking, bribing the independents, hopping in bed with the greens and making each seat a 3-cornered fight, and don’t forget the big fat lies all contributed to Gillard getting over the line by a nose.

      Her demonisation of Abbott before and after the election shows most reasonable people that she has nothing. Some people will never see reason though…just look at some of the regular Labor fanboys on The Punch!

    • Cybacat says:

      08:46am | 15/03/11

      You’re right - I see Juliar as a carbon copy of Rudd.  Arrogant in the extreme, she doesn’t care what anyone else wants or thinks.  It all about her, and she throws out the most condescending, insulting explanations for her behaviour.

    • Jugg says:

      06:07am | 15/03/11

      Without being political:

      How do you know what aid to give unless you understand the problem?
      How do you know how much aid to give unless you understand the problem?
      How do you know how big the problem is, unless you understand the problem?
      If nuclear fallout kills vast numbers of our population, would you blame the government for not understanding the problem?
      Would you blame the government for not taking steps to protect the country?

      I know at least half the political monkeys here would.

      It’s not like every single Japanese citizen is physically on hand rescuing people.  There are administrators, so why can’t they be asked questions?

      Wring your hands though Peter, it should achieve a great deal.

    • Tedd says:

      07:15am | 15/03/11

      A distant county like should not be concerned that nuclear fallout will kill vast numbers of our population.

      A non-nuclear country like Australia should not be offering aid for a nuclear problems, so Rudd’s demands for an update in the nuclear crisis are not about aid.

    • Muzz says:

      07:21am | 15/03/11

      All good questions Jugg but I don’t think that is what he had in mind.

    • MarK says:

      07:23am | 15/03/11

      “How do you know what aid to give unless you understand the problem?”

      You ask them, not demand information. Ask what they need not tell them what we will do.

      “How do you know how much aid to give unless you understand the problem?”

      Seriously? No one could give enough. You give what you are able to on request at this stage.

      “How do you know how big the problem is, unless you understand the problem?”

      You ask if you can assist and offer whatever they deem is necessary.

      “If nuclear fallout kills vast numbers of our population, would you blame the government for not understanding the problem?”

      Given this is an impossibility as plenty of experts have said do you also demand the latest update from Japan vis their preparedness to repel alien invaders?

      “Would you blame the government for not taking steps to protect the country?”

      Protect us? From what? In Australia?

      “Wring your hands though Peter, it should achieve a great deal. “

      LOL. Yeh. And inserting yourself in the issue as Rudd did was so so helpful. I bet the Japanese are comforted that Kevin demand some information and the loss of towns is now so much easier to take.

    • marley says:

      07:43am | 15/03/11

      You’ve missed the point entirely.  Kevin wasn’t operating in a spirit of international cooperation and friendship by asking what aid and assistance Australia could provide - he was demanding that the Japanese should make a special effort to provide him with updates.  They’ve already committed to briefing the IAEA - what more does Kevin expect to get?  And what makes you think that Australia would the first and only country affected (or even affected at all) if the worst happens?  I would expect the Chinese and Koreans to have a much bigger stake in what’s going on than we do.

      The fact is, the information is being provided to the IAEA, it’s on their website and is available to Kevin from that source.  He was just thrusting himself into the limelight at a time when attention should be on rescue and recovery.

    • kerry says:

      08:19am | 15/03/11

      @MarK - here you go again, repeating the falsehood that Rudd made a demand. Doesn’t matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true. As you said yesterday: “My humble apologies kerry i “failed” as you rightly pointed. I should not have put words in Kevins mouth.”

      Basing an argument on a false premise, MarK, always leads to a false conclusion - like your claim that I hate Andrew Bolt. Not true. I disagree with a lot he has to say, but I don’t hate him and I sometimes agree with him and I will say that if and when it arises.

      By your ‘logic’ am I supposed to draw the conclusion that you hate Rudd and that that hatred makes you dismiss everything he has to say out of hand?

    • Jugg says:

      08:20am | 15/03/11

      @ Tedd - Why because we have no nuclear expertise at all?  Any of our experts can’t provide an opinion?  Not very neighbourly?

      @ MarK

      What about the Australians who are in the country?  Should our country be concerned for our citizens?  Would you expect them to be concerned for your family if they were in the region?

      What kind of aid are you proposing to give?  Send food? Water? What?  Unless you ask you don’t know what they need.

      In reality, right now the situation is not under control.  They have no idea whether there will be nuclear fall out or how far it will extend.  Again if it was your family in a foreign country - you sound like you would be jumping up and down demanding Rudd ‘do something’.

      From the article - there are 11,000 Australians there.  Do you think their family here are concerned?  Do you think they want to find out where their family is and whether they are safe and whether the nuclear issues pose a risk to themselves and others and to Australians when they return?

      ‘LOL. Yeh. And inserting yourself in the issue as Rudd did was so so helpful.’

      Of course I expected personal attack, your argument so far hasn’t even touched superficiality, so that’s all you are left with, personal abuse to cover your own inadequacies.

    • Jugg says:

      08:25am | 15/03/11

      11,000 AUSTRALIANS in the country of any concern to you marley?

    • Michael says:

      11:43am | 15/03/11

      Good points Jugg. Still without being political is the fact that there are 11,000 australians in danger if these Nuclear reactors melt down. The reasoning for the demand was the fact that on a daily basis the information coming out was contradictory. Added to this is the fact that if these reactors go into melt down, the resulting immediate fall out may not reach Australia but they WILL reach a significant area of the pacifi rim and SE Asia. Being a member nation of the area we are justified in demanding answers. I dont like Rudd, never have and never will, but I think this Op-Ed has missed the point and so have a few commentators as well. Trivialising nation’s relationships as being akin to next door neighbours is poor journalistic style. They are nothing alike.

    • Jugg says:

      07:15am | 16/03/11

      What do you know MarK,

      The situation deteriorates, it’s worse than reported or first understood.

      Of course, we and the 11,000 Australians in the country, aren’t entitled to know this information.  It could cause their deaths, but they aren’t entitled to know this.

    • Rocket Surgeon says:

      06:33am | 15/03/11

      Your analogy is deeply superficial. Governments are not people. They are not small businesses. They are not even big businesses. They are governments. They are capable of things individuals are not and operate at many different levels. To criticise Kevin Rudd as he goes about the normal working of government is just hollow.

    • acotrel says:

      06:34am | 15/03/11

      @james Ricketson Australia is lucky it’s not me communicating with the Japanese on this disaster.  It’s difficult to have empathy where lack of responsibility is involved!  Who performed the risk assessments for those plants? They were not fail safe!

    • marley says:

      08:49am | 15/03/11

      If you read any of the links yesterday, you would know that nuclear plants are never entirely fail-safe.  That being said, these three antediluvian plants, hit by one of the strongest earthquakes and one of the biggest tsunamis in Japanese history, are still holding together, if barely.  That says something for the design, construction and management of those reactors, particularly given their age.  The biggest problem, as I understand it, is that the reactors did what they were supposed to do when the earthquake hit - they shut down, but the tsunami took out both primary and back-up power, which has messed up the cool-down process.  I’m not sure how you can anticipate that or build it into your risk assessments.

    • acotrel says:

      07:29pm | 15/03/11

      @marley You are telling me that highly trained Japanese engineers couldn’t anticipate failure of generatprs due to a tsunami?  - RUBBISH!!

    • marley says:

      09:06pm | 15/03/11

      Well, I dunno Acotrel - a record earthquake, a record tsunami - undoubtedly the protective dykes should have been higher, but hindsight is a wonderful thing, isn’t it?  Kind of like, yeah, the Comet should have been designed with curved windows, but they didn’t know that at the time and a couple of the planes blew apart mid-air. Is that a lack of responsibility or an error based on a limited knowledge of the possibilities at the time?  Those dykes would have been sufficient for most tsunamis in recent experience.

      I think it’s more than a bit harsh talking about a lack of empathy when people are risking their lives to get the situation under some sort of control.

    • TChong says:

      06:52am | 15/03/11

      What a load of bullocks.
      Hell yeah, lets not ask , lets not worry about nuclear radiation, dont want to upset them..
      As seen with whaling, some aspects of japanese culture, like to paint rosey pix, that might not always equal reality.
      The pathetic little make believe story at the beginning of this article, shows that the author lives in some strange fantasy world, where for the sake of tradition, we should delay taking action, or even asking what the real situation is.
      Dumb.

    • Flexo says:

      07:22am | 15/03/11

      Have you ever heard of the diplomatic approach?

      Remember what Rudd said in Israel last year?

      Remember Rudd blaming the surgeons who did everything to save his Dad’s life after the car accident he was in with a above normal blood alcohol level?

      This is a pattern of unacceptable behaviour.

      TChong says ‘......even asking what the real situation is.’ Maybe if the ALP bothers to find out what the real situation is we might get some successful policies through domestically.

    • TimB says:

      07:36am | 15/03/11

      TChong, it’s called a metaphor.

      And the Japanese will tell us what the situation is. Kevin didn’t need to go and demand anything.

    • dovif says:

      07:42am | 15/03/11

      The Left has never have any sort of sympathy for other people, they are just power hungry union thugs.

      They do not cared that 100,000, I repeat 100,000 people might have died, all they care about is what is in it for me,

      That is why they will never make good governments

    • TChong says:

      08:01am | 15/03/11

      Yes, the japanese govts has such a long proud history of being transparent and forthcoming in their dealings!
      Never tell half truths, never evasive.
      Flexo - do tell what the connection is with asking about the nuclear reactors has with domestic politics ?
      Nothing? At all?
      TimmyB- i realise it was a piece of fiction, but for what purpose ?
      I ( and anyone else) could also invent a little story in order to advance a POV, doesnt make it correct or relavant.

    • TimB says:

      08:18am | 15/03/11

      Actually, I should correct myself. It’s more of an analogy. I have no idea why I said metaphor.

    • kerry says:

      08:44am | 15/03/11

      @TimB. Well, no, Mauch’s house story is not a metaphor, it’s an analogy, and a pretty poor one at that. See http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-analogy-and-metaphor/

      However, if Japan is a house, then it’s a very large house. And if the northern wing is under threat, it does not prevent those in the central wing (say, Tokyo) from assessing the situation and considering offers of help from the international community. Nor would it prevent it from giving out information about the safety or lack thereof for its own citizenry or personnel arriving to help.

      Btw, the repetitive, fraudulent claim that Rudd made “demands” is tiresome. If you want to make an informed argument, go right ahead, but at least make its basis in truth.
      .

    • Flexo says:

      09:50am | 15/03/11

      TChong, clearly your answer shows that you are a mindless ALP stooge. You believe that for action to be taken requires us to understand the real situation? Why can’t that expected ALP notion be applied to domestic politics where it is really needed. You pick and choose your arguments to fit your ALP leanings. Rudd f@*ked up again, deal with it. The real situation - the ALP and its leaders past and present are hopeless.

    • DJ says:

      07:14am | 15/03/11

      Rudd has always been an embarrassment and will continue to be an embarrassment until the Prime Minister brings him to account. She wont do that because if she does he will either go feral and dump on her from the backbench or worse (better in the minds of most) resign and cause a by-election. Consider the possibilities.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      04:53pm | 15/03/11

      I am sure the families of the estimated 11,000 Australians in Japan, particularly those of the 180 (at this point in time) still missing are glad Rudd is going in hard. This is what I would want if any of my relatives were involved.
      Really Mr Mauch this is just a gratuitous exercise in Rudd bashing.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      04:53pm | 15/03/11

      I am sure the families of the estimated 11,000 Australians in Japan, particularly those of the 180 (at this point in time) still missing are glad Rudd is going in hard. This is what I would want if any of my relatives were involved.
      Really Mr Mauch this is just a gratuitous exercise in Rudd bashing.

    • Ray says:

      07:15am | 15/03/11

      Sean, we do not need the likes of Britain to tell us what to do. Please go away creep in your nearest little hole have a “Cuppa” and attend to your own stink before you make comment on our problems

    • James Ricketson says:

      08:58am | 15/03/11

      Ray, Sean made it quite clear from what perspective he was venturing an opinion about Rudd - as an observor from another country. Wherein lies the problem? By the logic of your argument none of us has a right to make pubic comment, express an opinion, about politicians in any other country! Parochialism at its worst!

    • kerry says:

      07:26am | 15/03/11

      Very, very sloppy, Mauch.
      By your own admission “the Japanese government must do something with a couple of nuclear reactors that – in the worst-case scenario – could raise the death toll by an almost unimaginable factor,” describing this as a “nightmarish situation.”

      Why then castigate Rudd for wanting information/briefings on this development when Australia is on the verge of sending consular officials and search and rescue/recovery personnel into such an area? Absurd.

      Primary sources are the historian’s raw material from which to analyse the past. You are right on the spot, right when history is being made, and do you consult a primary source to assess Rudd’s conversation with his Japanese counterpart? Do you use your Japanese connections to assess Rudd’s conversation? No!

      Just a link to a News Ltd journo’s account who in turn was regurgitating Barrie Cassidy’s assessment of Rudd on Insiders (which was edited, btw, to prove Cassidy’s point). I wonder what sort of grade you would give a student for this shoddy work. I suggest FAIL.

    • AT says:

      10:19am | 15/03/11

      Petey isn’t the first ostensibly serious professional to author such disingenuous pulp for the Punch, Kerry. These sort of circle-jerk-invite articles are becoming commonplace here.

      Interesting you should mention The Insiders. It was Andrew Bolt, another News Ltd ‘journo’ on the same ep who dismissed media coverage of the nukes as “symbolic” and “political”. This was just two days ago. No one has noted that in the PM’s very first (short) media statement following the earthquake/tsunami he used some of that limited time to stress there was no nuclear threat. A short time later “low level” radioactive steam was being vented, but there was no danger. Then more radioactive steam was vented, but still no danger. Then they started using sea water to cool the rods, no word if this was an act of desperation. Then one plant exploded, but the containment chamber was holding. Then a second explosion, but still no containment breach we were told. Now, the latest news tells us, a third explosion has damaged a containment vessel increasing the threat of a leak…

      Given Japan’s mendacious public pronouncements you’d have to say Rudd acted quite properly and in the best interests of Australia. Even if he had impolitely “demanded” briefings.

      This piece is not even remotely serious or grounded, it doesn’t merit a grading. Perhaps a tap on the head a suggestion the author go and play outside with other kids.

    • Vaunted says:

      01:48pm | 15/03/11

      Very pleased you’ve taken the trouble @ AT; a profound ‘grading’ from a fair, unbiased and intellectually superior chappie such as yourself is exactly what we circle-jerk imbeciles need to put us back on the correct path to a Ruddster redemption. I’ll bet you thought some of his other ground breaking diplomatic protocols such as back-turning on a parliamentary speaker were fair enough also.

    • john says:

      07:42am | 15/03/11

      Why dont we just go to early polls and vote them out!

    • iansand says:

      07:51am | 15/03/11

      I seem to have missed this “demand”.  What form did it take?

    • Puzzled Cat says:

      07:54am | 15/03/11

      Rudd was rude as buggery during the Qld floods, running around in his chambray shirt and RM’s, barely getting dirty, reporting people to police who wouldn’t leave their house when he thought they should, wading through waters despite the police telling him not to.  He was a pest and a show off.

      He was a pig during the election campaign, destabilising and refusing to even acknowledge his opponent.

      No different whether it be the middle east or Japan.

      He only stays in this position because Julia can’t afford a by-election.

    • The Original Oz says:

      08:15am | 15/03/11

      Ahhhhh - Kevin Rudd, Australia’s very own Cartman (South Park for those unaware). This goose is an embarrassment to Australia. Has been throughout his entire political career. The sooner Him, the Ginga Ninja and that one-policy show pony Bob Brown depart the political scene the sooner Australia might be able to make headway on things that matter (and no, I am not supporting the mad Monk as a potential PM, he has the potential to be even more embarrassing and cringe worthy than the current crop of lame ducks.

    • Knemon says:

      08:22am | 15/03/11

      I can’t believe I just read this load of bollocks. Our foreign minister shows concern for his people in what could have been (or could be) a Nuclear disaster, not to mention the Earthquake and Tsunami, and Peter Mauch has the gall to call Mr Rudd rude and that this reflects poorly on Australia…I never want to go to one of your history lectures Mr Mauch, I can only imagine how distorted your views on history must be.

    • GB says:

      10:18am | 15/03/11

      Spare us the confected outrage knemon. Mauch is absolutely spot on. The only thing Captain Earwax is “concerned” about is his own image and standing in the international community. “Demanding” answers from our major trading partner, a country in complete turmoil is beyond the height of arrogance. Talk about punching above your weight. All of this is just a dress rehearsal for his coveted next job with the UN anwyays and this buffoon just wants to keep his name at the forefront of world news bulletin (read Libya no-fly zone).  And Mauch is also 100% correct with his assessment of his rudeness. Ask anybody who has worked for him, lives near him, or God forbid had the gall to serve him up the wrong meal while he was wasting more of our taxpayer dollars jetting off all over the countryside. He is an egotistical git and his only saving grace in my eyes is that I can’t wait until he gets the ultimate payback on his own party with his inevitable “immediate retirement” from parliament, forcing a by-election. This is the same guy whose endorsement Gillard bought during the election campaign with the promise of the Foreign Affairs portolio, forcing Stephen Smith to step aside when he was doing a perfectly good job and is probably the only honourable person on that side of politics. Yeah, what a guy.

    • Knemon says:

      11:30am | 15/03/11

      GB - I too don’t give a damn about Rudd or the ALP for that matter and I agree with what you have said. I just don’t believe that it was rude making the enquiries that Rudd did, it’s his job. Remember, a lot of Australian residents were concerned about their family members in Japan, so who do they contact for information…DFAT. Should Rudd or DFAT just tell them to piss off?

    • Vaunted says:

      11:49am | 15/03/11

      Knemon, it was his patronising tone. Ignoring the fact that Japan dwarfs us in terms of industrial and technological (including nuclear) achievement and advancement, Kevin came across like an old-style British colonial master; condescending, presumptive and infinitely self-satisfied. Many Australians found it objectionable; goodness knows what our ‘Japanese friends’ made of it. Just listening to him made me wish I could retract my head into my torso and make it all go away.

    • Amber says:

      08:34am | 15/03/11

      Why would anyone expect anything else from the self-serving Krudd?  Another opportunity to stick up his head, despite how inappropriate.

    • TCB 24 x 7 says:

      09:49am | 15/03/11

      Go Rudd,
      Never inappropriate, after what was done to him, he can say and do what he likes and no one in labor can do ANYTHING about it, for he has them by the balls NOW.

    • Lily J says:

      09:02am | 15/03/11

      He can’t win.  By wanting to be immediately informed, he is accused of being pushy, rude and undiplomatic.  If he did nothing while waiting to see what develops, he would be accused of not acting in Australia’s interests, being paid for not doing his job and accused of pandering to/colluding with a foreign country that clearly is not “in control of a situation”.  If he waited to be briefed by the Japanese government/diplomats/public servants/experts at their convenience, he would be forced to rely on the overused “didn’t know/ was misinformed” defence and be attacked anyway.

    • Cat says:

      09:07am | 15/03/11

      Rudd is no diplomat.
      Might I also say that, right now, the last thing the Japanese appreciate is people who think they can speak Japanese mangling their language. I have been helping to set up communication lines with Japanese colleagues.  I do not speak or write any Japanese so we are working in English. They are pleading with me to tell people to use English not Japanese. Please do, the last thing they need now is misunderstandings - however well intentioned.

    • biff says:

      09:32am | 15/03/11

      While exercising your imagination just imagine that Kevin Rudd was our Minister of Foreign Affairs.

    • Chewy says:

      09:35am | 15/03/11

      Remember when all the media pushed Kevin07 as having strong foreign policy credentials?
      haha

    • jo says:

      09:48am | 15/03/11

      I think Kevin Rudd is doing a great job, and am amazed at you people spinning all this hostility towards him.
      As for the UK person, I can understand you having this attitude, by all the false things written about Kevin Rudd, in the Australian media,

      Most of you nit pickers dont even know kevin rudd personally, It just annoys you to see a man that is confident and intelligent, what other talent do we have in politics,  I guess you would prefer the other boring conformist poititions that are boring us to death.
      Love or hate him?  its interesting to note we are all still talking about kevin rudd.
      to you people who think he has a big head,  why shouldnt he he is intelligent, and has achieved a lot in his life, no one is perfect, except the keven rudd nit pickers of course.

    • The Badger says:

      01:18pm | 15/03/11

      “As for the UK person, I can understand you having this attitude, by all the false things written about Kevin Rudd, in the Australian media,”

      Don’t forget jo News Ltd shares copy with News International in Great Britain which publishes The Times, The Sunday TImes and such gems as The Sun and the News of the World. Murdoch has a lot to answer for.

    • Kimworldwide says:

      09:48am | 15/03/11

      Mr Rudd is doing his job,and very well. today, as reported on abc24 ,several more foreign ministers are NOW demanding the full facts,as are the Japanese people. They should have been fully briefed on day one.

    • Comedian says:

      09:53am | 15/03/11

      Rudd has a job to do, he needs to know what is the exact situation on the ground, after all we have Aussie in Japan and we are also sending Aussie help..If he came across as rude then so be it.

    • Duff says:

      09:56am | 15/03/11

      Let’s try this headline:

      “Rudd’s request for ‘urgent briefings’ downright rude”

      Doesn’t have the same ring, does it?

    • Kathrine Grant says:

      09:59am | 15/03/11

      If media reports are true then Kevin Rudd has been very rude.
      BTW when we refer to him as Krudd or to the Prime Minister as Joolya Gizzard or Juliar we demean ourselves for more then we demean either of them.

    • Rosie says:

      11:17am | 15/03/11

      Kathrine

      I think we have gone way past the demeaning stage! It is total embarrassment now that unfortunately we as Australians have to endure from Gillard who shafted PM Rudd to become PM Gillard. In Australia we have seen the change, shafted PM Rudd to Foreign Minister but around the globe Rudd frolics as if he is still the PM.

      Gillard can’t do anything about Rudd and allows him to do as he pleases she giggles nervously when questioned about the free lancing Rudd. Watched on Q&A last night and everytime she was asked about the shafting of Rudd, the lying of the carbon tax, her gushing speech in the US, her interview with Allan Jones, being called a Ju-liar, fake and real Julia etc she giggled, said the usual; “a very good question I am glad you asked it” and tries to answer with the spin she wants her auidence to hear!

      At least with Rudd, “what you see is what you get” who couldn’t give a damm about what people say or think of him because he knows very well that there is no way Gillard will ever want to get rid of him unless she is prepared to call another ELECTION!

      That folks is the hidden powers of the most embarrassing political twosome Australia has ever had! One is showing it off and the other is in denial pretending and faking leadership control.

      Oh by the way back in Australia she is agreement with Rudd on the issue of Libya’s no fly zone and Rudd’s demands of instant info about the Japanese nuclear reactors. In America she was with Obama with everything Obama said!

    • Steve Putnam says:

      07:29pm | 15/03/11

      @Rosie give it a rest you’re only making more and more of a fool of yourself. You seem to be in a permanent state of confected outrage. Get with the plot; a catastrophe is unfolding before our eyes. Nobody is interested in your much repeated rant about who knifed who.

    • Dr B S Goh says:

      10:00am | 15/03/11

      The PM has a big problem here. Maybe it is the old story that you do not make a doctor a Minister of Health. He would not be able to see the bigger picture.

      Best thing the PM can do now is to re-organize the Cabinet, Move K Rudd to become Minister of Education. There he can talk his head off and it does not matter. Maybe they may even find him amusing.

      We live in a dangerous World and our Foreign Minister must focus on Asia.

      It is silly for the FM to fly around the Middle East and North Africa to try to sort out the MESS in that part of the World. Was he aware what, US National Intelligence Director James Clapper said that Gadhafi’s advantage in military force makes him likely to survive the revolt? Are we creating another slaughter in Libya as we did in the case of the Kurds by the evil Saddam Hussein in Iraq?

      Why was he pushing hard to sell uranium in UAE so that UAE rich in gas can have a Nuclear Power Station by 2017? There is danger that UAE in the Middle East can be taken over by an evil dictator or a group of Extremists. If ALP policy says Nuclear Energy is very dangerous why sell it to UAE.

      Again why does ALP stop Australia selling uranium to India. We should do so and place conditions: (i) It is not used for weapons (ii) India does something serious about CO2 pollution and (iii) India takes action to reduce population growth.

    • GB says:

      10:23am | 15/03/11

      Sorry Doc. Gillard isn’t going to take that portfolio off him. As part of shoring up the Qld vote during the elction campaign, she had to give him the Foreign Affairs portolio. If she takes that way from him I’d have no doubt he’ll retire from politics immediately and force a by election. He, like Bob Brown and the independents, has her by the short and curlies. An utter mess.

    • Georgina says:

      10:11am | 15/03/11

      So we are all perfect are we? Stop throwing stones and clean up your own back yard. Prevention is Better Than a Cure (G Kehl)

    • Bryndal says:

      10:22am | 15/03/11

      It was Barry Casidy that used the term ‘demand’ it was never part of the communication from Rudd. It was urgent as you would expect in the situation.

      Just more of the beatup the News journalists are perpetuating. Build a bridge.

    • Chris L says:

      09:51pm | 15/03/11

      Don’t bring up the truth Bryndal. It has no place here it seems.

    • Gregg says:

      10:34am | 15/03/11

      Rudd has always been one to want to own a situation, giving him his own sense of importance he so craves.
      If he too a few moments to see what is going on, he would realise that the situation up in the earthquake zone aside from the Nuke PS issues is so dire for the locals with shortages of all manner of things building that the Japanese government has such a massive task on its hands there are going to be numerous failures in providing even basic services.

      And then overshadowing all of this is the Nuclear very uncertain situation and you only have to read the statements coming out from the government, no doubt safely snug at some greater distance and it is more a case of there’s every hope that they will get some stability but there’s every chance of things getting far worse and they do not really know for they are dealing with something they have never had to deal with previously.

      All Rudd and the people going to Japan at the moment need to know is that they are going into a very uncertain dangerous place, even aftershocks and another tsunami a possibility, let alone a radioactive fallout.
      How do you have a scale of the potential dangers and how do you measure where you are on that scale when you have limited control and cannot measure.

      And then someone like Rudd reckons government officials ought to be updating him when the government officials themselves will not really know.
      The man is an idiot and will continue to be an embarassment no matter what he is doing.

    • Richard says:

      10:40am | 15/03/11

      Just because the armchair foreign correspondent who wrote this is short sighted does not mean that the Australian government representative must be as short sighted and twiddle thumbs. Fascinating to read up on News Corp LNP employees writing anti-government scrapes because they are clouded by real issues…. No wonder journalism is down the pipe in recent years..

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      10:41am | 15/03/11

      Although I agree that the man is a stooge. I think you are being disengenuous and misleading to say that he ‘demanded’ anything, he requested. There is actually a difference there.

    • Miki says:

      11:00am | 15/03/11

      Another Anti Rudd article in the Media! How many is that this week? Rudd’s every move, every conversation, every thought and every motivation are scrutinised to nth degree by journalists who would have us believe they are privy to… every move, every conversation, every thought and every motivation. Trite tripe is served up to the public as if it were fact and as if the journalist was actually reporting on something for which they had substantial proof. It begs the question of who is feeding the press these juicy titbits and why are they regurgitated to the public?  If I was a suspicious person I might think there was an orchestrated campaign determined to undermine Rudd and hound him for political life. Nah… surely not. Surely even the media aren’t that pathetic.

    • TCB 24 X 7 says:

      11:49am | 15/03/11

      The anti Rudd people can scream all they want about him, you see he dont give a shit, especially about gillard.
      People and the media Fail to see that Rudd is Untouchable, for he holds that balance of power within labor and he Knows it.
      He’s got labor by the balls, can say and do what he pleases and the anti Rudd people just have to take it or sack him, but they would not want that for it would risk of having a a bi election.

    • hermes says:

      11:50am | 15/03/11

      But everyone knows the press, particularly the Canberra press gallery and the ABC i.e. Q&A, are succoured and nurtured by the ALP establishment. Of course they are trying to make Kevin Rudd look bad; the machiavellian, and incompetent Gillard wants him to look bad, because more people prefer him as leader. Duh. It’s a no brainer. Where do you think these leaks to the press come from? The Coalition? They are just sitting back laughing.

    • Bryndal says:

      12:08pm | 15/03/11

      @Hermes - I see…Labour are doing this to undermine Rudd so he will look bad & Julia will look better? It is not the school yard….simplistic personality driven responses are not the answer.
      There is an ongoing campaign by News and other right wing affiliates like the Libs to destablise the relationship (what there is of it) and try and show disunity. Disunity is death. The oposition has exactly the same issue with Tony & Malcome but you dont see t0eh right wing media beating that up.

    • Vaunted says:

      12:49pm | 15/03/11

      @Bryndal, your ‘it’s all a conspiracy’ slant on the situation would be truly amusing if it wasn’t quite so serious for the rest of us. Your loyalty to the comrades is touching but believe me, nothing much bad would be said or written if our glorious elected leaders were in any way competent or cohesive. If you can’t see that you’re publicly backing an amateurish shower of inept bunglers who are bad for our nation that’s your business, but the rest of us are entitled to our thoughts and it’s got nothing to do with what’s said by News reporters, the Libs or or shock jocks. Give us some credit mate, we mostly aren’t members of any party and neither are we employees of News Ltd; we can actually think for ourselves.

    • Bryndal says:

      01:41pm | 15/03/11

      @ Vaunter - Never said it was a conspiracy - just a campaign by right wing media that is not very well organised so no conspiracy.
      Both sides are just as bad (as I pointed out) but I certain feel that 1 flavour of incompetents is better than the another. And that the otherside isn’t getting quite the same scrutiny in terms of its own leadership issues.  Settle pettle or you will bust a phuffer valve - if the public debate wasn’t always expressed through the lens of the media I would agree with you but when you see things like the variation of poll results when a question is worded differently as on the Drum site or the claims on Punch about ‘Demands’ which weren’t ‘demands then you have to question the ‘direction’ people are being pushed into thinking by influential commentators etc.

    • Chris L says:

      09:55pm | 15/03/11

      That’s funny Vaunted. I guess when the liberal supporters go on about media conspiracies to harm Abbot or the liberal party that is an amusing slant too? I agree.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      11:24am | 15/03/11

      @Mauch.  I’m not sure if the question has been asked:  Did Rudd raise his concerns directly with Japan first before raising the matter through the public medium? Public reaction suggests to me that people regard this as prudent and that Rudd could have done so in the timeframe.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      12:48pm | 15/03/11

      Oops again.  I meant to write ‘couldn’t have done so in the timeframe’

    • mike from toowoomba says:

      11:37am | 15/03/11

      DFAT has never given a rats about the average Australian overseas, so why pretend now!

    • Theythinkwearestupid says:

      12:01pm | 15/03/11

      Ho Hum - Another Rudd bashing piece from another dodgy journo.

      Here’s an idea, lets stick a camera and microphone in front of this journalist and follow him around 24/7 and see what we can come up with.

      To the Punch Technical Staff - It is about time you starting putting IP’s against some of these posters and the resolved name.

      The general readers of this site might be interested to know what kind of comments are coming from particular PR firms etc.

    • Saskia says:

      12:50pm | 15/03/11

      There is a myth that Rudd is a good diplomat.

      He is not.  In fact he is worst foreign minister Australia has ever had.

      He is loathed as a sly user in every nation he has set foot.

      In Asia in particular he is deeply loathed.

      In Rudd and Gillard Australia’s brand is being trashed, mocked, laughed at and destroyed by the minute.

    • Miki says:

      01:57pm | 15/03/11

      So eveyone keeps saying. Everyone being: certain sections of the press, certain Labor apparatchiks and certain Young Liberals; they all flock to their keyboards with endless enthusiasm to denegrate Rudd.  Their, and now your, diatribe seems to know no bounds. Rudd is Australia’s worse FM? Really? Your views stem from your substantial and comprehensive understanding of Australian history and international relations no doubt. Rudd is a sly user in every nation he has set foot in? You obviously accompany him on his travels and have first hand evidence you can share with us. And in Asia he is particularly loathed? You must be quite the talented linguist as well, to capture and understand the nuances in so many countries where cultural courtesy is paramount. We look forward to you sharing your vast wealth of knowledge and inside information with us more fully.

    • Rollo says:

      12:56pm | 15/03/11

      The problem with this analogy is that it’s not the ashes and sparks flying towards the neighbour’s roof that are the problem, it’s the dozens of gas cylinders stored in the garage that the neighbour is concerned about.

    • hermes says:

      01:45pm | 15/03/11

      um, for those criticising Kevin Rudd’s request, have you seen the latest updates on the Japanese nuclear emergency? Seems a tad more serious than a couple of days ago, having suffered meltdown, and a nuclear radiation cloud potentially spreading over large areas, which in a worst case scenario, could include Australia.

    • Against the Man says:

      02:36pm | 15/03/11

      So Rudd acting like a little, demanding bitch is going to help the situation how? You don’t seem to see that Ruddy is acting all tough and in chargey to over compensate for his cry baby image. Rudd has as much respect as eel turd all over Asia. Gilltard can’t get rid of him so she puts up with his childish behaviour. This ALP government is equivalent to the Nixon administration - corrupt, corrupt, corrupt; this ALP government is typical of all ALP governments - incompetent, incompetent, incompetent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      02:49pm | 15/03/11

      I make no secret of the fact that I cannot stand Julia Gillard - that is not to say she is not really a very nice person..But.. she did set about the destruction, based, we were told on a couple of bad Polls, remember them? They are the things Gillard tells us she never comments on. This latest one for her qualifies her for removal from office by the NSW Right & the unelected Paul Howes of the AWU
      However what is done is done & cannot be reversed.
      I do not like Kevin Rudd very much either..
      He got dumped. End of story.
      That Gillard was so stupid as to appoint him Foreign Minister just goes to show how ill-suited to leadership she is.
      Rudd is the Foreign Minister of a very small nation - albeit the best in the world - which, on the world stage, is of little to no importance. The only reason any other large country acknowledges us is because we have lots of lovely minerals & they want them.
      It is beyond time that Rudd pulled his head in.
      How dare he admit that he ‘demanded’ that Japan should report to him!
      Japan has more than enough on it’s plate right now to be worried about what Kevin Rudd or anyone else in Australia wants.
      Sure the nuclear break-down in Japan is serious The Japanese Government & associated agencies are doing their best to address the problem & don’t need some arrogant Australian politician sticking his nose in.
      He is not a good Foreign Minister. He is a lousy one. The fact that he can speak a bit of Mandarin is immaterial. It is high time Rudd stopped his fart-arsing around the world to bolster his over-inflated opinion of his own importances He should bloody well stay & stop embarrassing us.
      Just because someone says they have an interest in something like Foreign Affairs does not qualify them for the position of Foreign Minister.
      So Rudd was a sort of diplomat for a while. So what? Other countries, particularly the big & powerful, do not like some upstart control-freak from a small nation of minimal importance telling them what to do. It only puts their backs up. Doubtless they have huge teams of people inventing excuses why their Foreign Ministers, Prime Ministers etc. are not available to speak with this, reportedly, serial telephone pest. Gillard must cut him loose.
      The Rudd-Gillard Federal Government was a joke in Asia & elsewhere
      The Gillard Federal Government is a joke both in Aisa, Europe the USA & right here in Australia.
      Rudd is, as Saskia says, loathed & detested wherever he goes. He should go & go now.
      The Gillard junket to the USA was a waste of time & our money.
      She acheived about as much as she & Rudd acheived at the Copenhagen talk-fest and that was a bit, fat zero.
      Wayne Swan tarted around the world attending all sorts of Economic Summits, forums etc. and what did he acheive? Nothing.

    • michael j says:

      03:44pm | 15/03/11

      Should have offered him the key to the plant and told him to check the fu-n n
      thing for himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    • Against the Man says:

      04:42pm | 15/03/11

      Rudd has no balls to do anything remotely brave. Maybe the keys to a NY strip club…...............................

    • Rose says:

      04:03pm | 15/03/11

      “Therefore when we are getting conflicting information day one, it’s entirely appropriate for me to raise that directly in my conversations with the Japanese Foreign Minister and what I raised with the Japanese foreign minister was simply to request that information flow to Australian and IAEA officials.” What on earth is wrong with that?

    • The Badger says:

      04:39pm | 15/03/11

      Don’t confuse the conservatives with facts Rose. They love a good old fashioned baseless beat-up.
      It’s either that or NO and people are getting tired of NO.

    • Mirror says:

      05:20pm | 15/03/11

      He’s not Liberal…

    • jg deman says:

      05:24pm | 15/03/11

      Would you have still written this article if your children were among the australians in fukushima? i doubt it. nobody likes kevin-747, but asking for information is his job. Maybe you think foreign ministers should sit on their hands and do nothing to help Australians abroad in disaster scenarios. just watch out, it might be you next time.

    • Catching up says:

      07:06pm | 15/03/11

      Another beat up is Mr. Rudd demanding a briefing on the nuclear power house situation in Japan. The highly indignant Mr. Bolt is correct that we are to far away to be in any danger.

      What is also true that Australians that are visiting or living in Japan are not.  I am sure I support the FM Rudd’s attempt to ensure the safety of these people.  It does take time to get people out and any information as to whether this is a possibility is important.


      I have been led to believe that FM Rudd did not use the word “demand”.

    • MP says:

      08:38pm | 15/03/11

      Fair suck of the sav, Rudd-bashing should be declared an Olympic sport. - and it now seems that the English want a team.
        I would really respect a journalist who DID NOT just jump on the band-wagon and pile crap on the former PM.
      How about an original story, you know, one with facts!!! As it turns out, Japan has released information about the status of their nuclear reactors. Therefore Rudd’s request seems to have been a fair ‘ask’ and since as I, nor Peter Mauch,  was in the room at the time, or the phone, or the tweet, we cannot pretend to have any conclusive proof, as to whether it was a ‘DEMAND’ or a routine request for information.
      There was something called “The Rudd Experiment’ conducted on ninemsm last year.  It was concluded that when the name Rudd appeared in the title of a story, it received a large number of hits.  Very revealing I’d say.
      I think that exposes second-rate journos as the lazy, attention cravers that they are.

    • Ozziebloke says:

      10:01pm | 15/03/11

      In my opinion every foreign Minister has currently the right to ASK Japan for an explanation and regular updates. For starters already for economical reasons, as this disaster affects many other countries. If it is DEMANDED, it clearly shows irritation with the foreign Minister of not getting enough information and updates. Australian dollar went hard down today under influence of the Japanes yen. The fact that the PM DEMANDED today an explanation from the operator of the plant, shows an exact similar irritation. So what got that to do with politics, what got that to do with Kevin Rudd?
      Particular don’t like Rudd or Gillard for non-personal reasons. But I don’t like pommies either who call our official elected representations “an embarrassment”. Very offensive actual for the average Australian.
      My mum always told me, never care what other people think of you. Only care about the opinion of people who love you. This pommie clearly does not love Australia!

    • Anthony says:

      01:49am | 16/03/11

      Wish Rudd was on the ground in Japan (or Libya for that matter) solving the problems of the world. Anywhere but Australia. Please…....

    • Mark says:

      05:41am | 16/03/11

      If there were any real men in the cabinet room, they’d drag Rudd outside and punch the incompetent, arrogant control freak in the head.

      And repeat as necessary

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @bencubby: This Estonian chap is a bit of a superstar (has anyone ever said that before?) #SBSeurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

@MelanieTait I was thinking the same thing!

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter