Veteran Labor heavyweight, Graham Richardson was asked several weeks back what Kevin Rudd would really think about a Labor defeat. The powder-dry former senator conceded that somewhere in the dark recesses of Rudd’s soul, he’d probably be delighted.

Kevin Rudd at the Labor campaign launch on Monday. Picture: AFP

That may have been true just after his demise. And to be fair, a degree of schadenfreude is only human after such trauma. But a few weeks on and with the voters’ judgment hanging like Damocles’ Sword, Kevin Rudd must now be hoping for an ALP victory. His future prospects and his legacy depend on it.

Whether fair or not, nothing short of the Government surviving will salvage Kevin Rudd’s reputation with his colleagues.

Nobody will say it openly, certainly not before the election, but word from inside the Labor camp is, if the Gillard Government hits the fence tonight, he will be directly blamed - and become persona non grata in Caucus.

``They just don’t trust him,’’ a well placed figure said.

This level of enmity will come as a surprise to more distant onlookers who might expect that if Labor loses, he would be vindicated and Ms Gillard blamed. Her move on him viewed as a disastrous over-reaction to bad polls.

So why do Labor MPs see it differently? Principally because any loss will be attributed not to the leadership change but to its aftermath and particularly, to a series of leaks which crippled Gillard’s campaign, costing it three weeks and causing voters to consider Tony Abbott seriously for the first time.

Kevin Rudd, and some commentators, believe the switch to Gillard was the problem and that Mr Rudd would have done better than his replacement. According to this logic, voters saw the change as a damning self critique by Labor which of itself, rendered it unfit for office.

It has some attractions as an argument but advocates need to show how Mr Rudd was going to resolve the mining tax dispute which he was intent on allowing to drag on swamping all else for ``months’’ - his words.

With an election due, this self-started crisis was a political cul de saq from which Rudd (and Wayne Swan incidentally) showed no sign of even trying to escape. Exasperated Labor MPs concluded it was the triumph of bravado over strategy and felt they had no option.

Of course, the leadership change led to the three damaging leaks against Gillard so in that sense, his run would have been smoother. But she was riding high in the polls when thy occurred.

Few in Labor express any doubt about their origin pointing the finger squarely at Kevin Rudd. Leak one claimed Ms Gillard had reneged on a deal to delay any challenge until October.

Its main effect was to keep the coup in the headlines stealing Labor the oxygen needed to talk about the economy.

There was also a claim that she sent a junior staffer to National Security Committee of Cabinet. Again, its main damage was superficial. By far the most damaging, was the claim that Ms Gillard had opposed paid parental leave and a pension increase. This killed her new hero status with women.

Pollsters say you can chart Labor’s decline from this moment. A decline from which it never fully recovered.

Even if Labor scrapes through, Kevin Rudd’s future remains problematic given these events. It is a remarkable fall from grace. The actual source of the leaks will never be known. But this is politics, not a courtroom. Trust has been fractured.

Among the options open to Ms Gillard would be to install him as foreign affairs minister. This has the advantage of keeping her promise while also having him out of the country a lot.

Then there are outside posts. A UN role or senior diplomatic appointment possibly? Academia? Mr Rudd’s Alma Mater, the prestigious Australian National University, is searching for a new Vice Chancellor to replace Professor Ian Chubb next year. Perhaps a former PM would suffice?

While it is not known who did the leaking, one can imagine their thoughts today as Labor contemplates a devastating first term defeat. Like an accidental murder suspect on The Bill, who’s suddenly faced with the true consequences of his actions: ``I just wanted to scare them, that’s all, I didn’t mean to kill anybody’‘.

Most commented

49 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Adam says:

      06:12am | 21/08/10

      Gillard mounts the final offensive but it’s not through the mud, it’s throwing the stuff.

      Adam of the Skeptocats

    • PeterD says:

      06:39am | 21/08/10

      I think you make too much out of the leaks. If you asked most people in the street they wouldn’t even remember what the leaks were. What is scary is if Labor win and Rudd is put back in the front row with Gillard there is sure to be no unity with in the Labor Government. You speak about 2 leaks, that will be nothing compared to a Government with an ex Prime Minister who was knifed by the current Prime Minister in the front row and a Government full of people who don’t like him.

    • TimB says:

      06:50am | 21/08/10

      It’s not just judgement from his colleagues he wll have to face. It will be the judgment of history.

      If Tony manages to pull off a win today, Rudd will be labeled as one of (of not the) worst PM’s in history. As it stands it might happen even with a Labor win.

      His ego won’t be able to handle that.

    • Super D says:

      07:26am | 21/08/10

      His party has already delivered to him a humiliation that will echo through the ages.  In a hundred years pundits will be comparing first term leaders with bad polls to Rudd.  His great-great grandchildren will feel his shame.

    • MarK says:

      09:35am | 21/08/10

      “If Tony manages to pull off a win today, Rudd will be labeled as one of (of not the) worst PM’s in history. As it stands it might happen even with a Labor win.”

      Oh that verdict is in. The Labor Party made that clear 8 weeks ago.

      History will not be kind. Think a poor mans Gough without the groovy voice.

    • Luke says:

      05:32pm | 21/08/10

      Many consider Howard one of the worst PM’s in history

    • TimB says:

      07:36pm | 21/08/10

      You mean many one-eyed LABOR supporters consider Howard one of the worst. The unbiased view of history knows better.

    • Razor says:

      07:07am | 21/08/10

      “This level of enmity will come as a surprise to more distant onlookers ” - only if they have been walking around with fingers in their ears going lalalalalala.

      In less than half a day after the challenge against Rudd coalesced the numbers became so bad for Rudd that he didn’t even have the honour to back his last promise to the electorate and didn’t run in the ballot in caucus.  For his own party to react so viscerally towards him, a first term PM, indicates just how hated he really is by those who know him much better than the electorate.  I am glad La Guillotine offered him a senior Cabinet post if re-elected because it shows what a craven political animal she really is - a devotee of Richo - whatever it takes.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:26am | 21/08/10

      Rudd is a very rich man, he doesn’t need politics. He could be a real man who fights for his and his family’s honour or he could be Gillard’s lapdog. Guess which one he chose. Sad and pathetic….....

    • Reg says:

      02:54pm | 21/08/10

      Yes it is sad and pathetic that you think people only enter politics for the money, though not surprising to hear from a Liberal supporter.

    • Against the Man says:

      10:08pm | 21/08/10

      Silly Reg if you read my post you would realise I’m stating that since money isn’t an issue for Rudd that he should have fought hard like a man not like a man that is a slave to the party because of his monthly paycheck!

    • T.Chong says:

      07:32am | 21/08/10

      Rudd has played the game, same as Turnbull. 
      The angry, disruptive, election campaign destroying Rudd never materialised, much to the dissapointment of many a Right leaning journalist.

    • Philip says:

      09:06am | 21/08/10

      T. Chong, is it possible you were watching a different version of the election campaign than I was ? Mr Rudd was already destroyed before the campaign began and has only had confirmed by the Prime Minister that he was dumped because he was dragging Labour backwards.
      I really don’t get your drift.

    • Gregg says:

      01:13pm | 21/08/10

      Chongy, I’‘ll do a metooism but only in as much that you’ve lost the plot.
      Turnbull was dissappointed some on losing the leadership and that’s natural though he is knowledgeable and resilient enough to know that’s politics and his views were not held by all Liberal parliamentarians and a change occurred on policy lines.
      There is not the hatred that Krudd has and Turnbull will always be a solid contributor to the Liberal side.
      Krudd was always immune from electorate defeat as it was known he was popular in his electorate and possibly could pick up sympathy votes.
      The only campaign to destroy him has come from within the Labor Party and he has had bugger all media coverage other than leaks and that god awful meet up followed by a sombre looking immediately ex PM in the second row of all places, a real show of support for Gillard in that!
      Not only astute rusted Laborites would pick that up, no Therese there and there could yet be a swing against him too.

    • John C says:

      07:53am | 21/08/10

      The problem with Rudd, and also Gillard and lots of others on the labor front bench, is that they had no commitment to principles, other than power, and were prepared to say anything and pass it off as the truth. This government was the perfect post-modernist government, with no point of reference other than that of moral relativism.

    • Philip says:

      08:35am | 21/08/10

      What was the point of Ms. Gillard offering Mr Rudd a senior position on the front bench if it wasn’t in anticipation of the vindictive side of Rudd somehow causing trouble for his successor ? Labour’s big mistake was not to give him that role before the election .To say as Gillard said,she would give him a senior role if Labour is re-elected reaks of some kind of attempt at a control order against Rudd.Well it didn’t quite work if it is true that he leaked internal secrets and so they had to pull him to a subsequent meeting by his ears to stop the rot.In the photos of that meeting,it certainly looked like he had been read the riot act and now,if Labour do escape the chop,how is it possible that he could cooperate with the Government as a senior man given he has always been a one man band and is unlikely to listen to anyone except himself ? Likely as not he would be dismissed as a minister at some point and again,chaos would reign.You would have to be simple minded to vote Labour in under those likely scenarios.God help Australia if Labour is re-elected.

    • Polly Waffle says:

      08:44am | 21/08/10

      Australian doesn’t deserve any of the two manjor parties.  Even tho I don’t agree will all of the Greens policies, I hope we khave a hung Parliament so everyone has to discuss and negotiate everything!

    • T.Chong says:

      09:00am | 21/08/10

      The trouble with that Polly, is that the major party in the coalition would be obliged to follow any and every crazy idea of the coalition, in order to stay in power, very much like what happens in the Israeli parliament, where loony settler and supremists paties hold sway.

    • MarK says:

      09:40am | 21/08/10

      No you don’t.

      We will be doing this all again for Xmas if that is the case. The whole thing would be dysfunctional given the likely (well certain) prospect of the Greens holding the balance of power in the Senate.

      One thing would come of it. We would see the Greens actually have to account for their decisions. That will be funny…..and so not what they want.

    • nosthow says:

      09:20am | 21/08/10

      And so it does Mark. However the terrible spectre of having the Mad Monk as PM, ancient Warren Truss as Deputy PM and god help Australia Julie Bishop of all people as our Foreign Minister ! Ladies and gentlemen of Austarlia I rest my case !

    • Luke says:

      12:42pm | 21/08/10

      The real risk is you could wake up Sunday morning with Julia Gillard as Prime Minister.

    • Dwgw says:

      05:35pm | 22/08/10

      Nosthow,have actually even met any of these people you are bagging?
      I bet not. Just peddling the Labor fear campaign still

    • Philip says:

      09:27am | 21/08/10

      Polly Waffle,That would be just dandy ! More talk fests,less action,nil debt retirement.Trying to negotiate or discuss anything with the Greens will likely be long,drawn out and totally counter productive given they are trying to destroy the economic base that Australia needs to maintain to survive in the modern world.

    • Freeman says:

      09:32am | 21/08/10

      if labor lose Rudd will go down as the the worst PM in living memory and for an ego maniac like Rudd that’s gotta hurt. I still cringe when I recall his self-serving speech after he was knifed.

    • Joan says:

      09:37am | 21/08/10

      There is nothing worse than a stalled car….. a vote for Greens will stall the growth and progress of this nation ... a Liberal or Labor outright win is the only way to a better Australia, better for its people, better in every way.

    • Big Al of W.A. says:

      10:25am | 21/08/10

      Polly Waffle, it is very obvious that you didn’t live in Tasmania when Bob Brown had the balance of power in the state upper house. If you had lived there you would not be making such a stupid comment. The state was ungovernable because of the inane conditions he put on passing any policies, if the Greens get the balance of power in the Senate it will be Tassie all over again

    • Gerard says:

      01:50pm | 21/08/10

      At least if that happens, people might stop seeing the Greens as a legitimate political option.

    • Gran Depine says:

      10:35am | 21/08/10

      Mr Rudd is only concerned about his UN ambitions. I encourage ambition and hard work, but I honour successfully completed business plans,  leadership and fraternity even more.

      If Mr Rudd wants to pay homage to the world elite and UN, well let him piss off quickly from Australia because I did not have the chance to vote him out. As for the UN, they should wipe Mr Rudd’s lipstick from their behind and scrutinise his report card during his former State Government position as Chief of Staff at the QLD Premier’s office and his performance during Federal Government since 2007. His alleged data documentation skills have not yet been scrutinised properly during the continuing QLD case, internationally recognised as one of the world’s best examples of Government data documentation records incompetence which were destroyed during a court case that perverted justice for the gang rape of an Origine minor victim nearly 20 years ago,  known as the   “Heiner Affair” .

      As for our PM who orchestrated the Ex-PM Rudd’s resignation. All she can say is, LET’S LOOK FORWARD. PM GILLARD, shame on you. If you represent everyone and especially people who can not represent themselves why haven’t you mentioned anything during your election campaign about Indigenous affairs. Let’s look forward. You wish to introduce NT Intervention methodologies for social security recipients where they will be given “Food Stamps” or vouchers so that your “NANNY Socialist” state will tell them what to do like the poor originie people facing during the Intervention in NT. 

      The successful progression and evolution of a society is demonstrated by the way we treat our custodians, elders and they way we care for people who can not help themselves. This is Australia PM Gillard not the USA or corporate subsidiary of the United Nations. Do us all a favour and piss off quickly to New York with Mr Rudd.

    • mervyn ford says:

      11:43am | 21/08/10

      Why has Rudd hung around. Most ex PM’s do the honorable thing and resign.
      He was a pathetic figure sitting on the backbenches, it just shows what he will put himself thru to hold on to some form of power, and possibly undermine gillard if she gets up ( god help us all).

    • Reg says:

      04:11pm | 21/08/10

      As much as the Liberals may wish it, we in Australia have yet to adopt the Japanese philosophy of suicide before dishonour.

      Perhaps John Howard should have taken this course but he didn’t. I bet he still waves his gnarled finger in the air telling everyone how right he was. Well the people didn’t agree, he was voted utterly and completely thumbs down which is the final political assessment. Why is he not slinking shamefaced into the past? How can he dare show his face in the public arena ever again?

      Kevin Rudd has not suffered such a complete rejection, he is still available and elected. The Liberals can adopt the Japanese way out if they like, but we on the other side are made of sterner stuff.

    • Sam says:

      05:28pm | 21/08/10

      Reg says:04:11pm | 21/08/10

      As much as the Liberals may wish it, we in Australia have yet to adopt the Japanese philosophy of suicide before dishonour.

      Perhaps John Howard should have taken this course but he didn’t. I bet he still waves his gnarled finger in the air telling everyone how right he was. Well the people didn’t agree, he was voted utterly and completely thumbs down which is the final political assessment. Why is he not slinking shamefaced into the past? How can he dare show his face in the public arena ever again?


      Reg, I keep wondering if any of his liberal friends have had the balls to inform the old fool that the ICC job he so coveted, but was too racist for, has gone to a Kiwi.

    • Reg says:

      08:11pm | 21/08/10

      Sam I believe that John Howard would have felt the International black-balling even more than he did the loss of his political status. To lose office after a near record period could never hurt as much as being informed that his chosen activity had decided,—- by international consensus,—- that he had shown himself to be unworthy of the position.

      Better never to have sought the position than to suffer the public humiliation of having his presumption rejected. I think it’s typical of the man that he thought his image would make him a shoe-in. 

      But we mustn’t gloat , must we? Kevin wouldn’t want us to.

    • mervyn ford says:

      07:32pm | 23/08/10

      @Reg. Howard was voted out after an electon, krudd was a sitting PM stabbed in the back by faceless men

    • David says:

      11:45am | 21/08/10

      Labor will blame Rudd if they lose or there is a hung parliament or the Greens get the balance of power in the Senate. What they wanted (like any party) is control of both houses. They are unlikely to get that. Nobody is going to blame Gillard, Swan or the unions - and that is where the real problem lies. 
      As it now stands the Greens could easily end up the most powerful political force in the country. They have some completely irresponsible and unworkable policies - that will appeal to some irresponsible people. It is a pity that the major parties have not taken environmental issues much more seriously because we will have a major problem on our hands come tomorrow. All we can hope for is that this coming Labor government does not last long enough to do too much damage.

    • Bob H says:

      12:23pm | 21/08/10

      Maybe Rudd is playing a long game.  In his view, he delivered Labor a win after years in the wilderness, was betrayed and Gillartined against the wishes of the people.  Rudd the Phoenix?  I cannot think of any other reason why he stuck around..

    • MarK says:

      12:43pm | 21/08/10

      Needs to still be in the public eye to get into the UN.

      If he goes private it will be harder as he can carry “no weight” as an Aussie govt rep - or Aussie politician in all likelihood after today.

    • FooManU says:

      12:52pm | 21/08/10

      He has an understanding of Chinese ways where the long game is all.  He has even developed the Chinese leader, glazed look, that says “I’ll get you in the end”, check out the photo.  I wouldn’t even rule out Rudd starting a new party to damage Labor, his personality requires revenge.

    • Gran Depine says:

      02:02pm | 21/08/10

      @FooManU Mr Rud’d gaze is more like a Singapore Air Hostesses “would you like number 43 with satay sauce and a happy finish” smile. Revenge by starting a new political party ..hahaha..please don’t make me laugh. No, no, no ,no he is a well trained student of the Machiavellian success by manipulation, deception, false flag and psy op school. He is the type that will BLUFF IT ‘TIL HE MAKES IT every bloody time. He is not intelligent enough to rise to power on his own. He needs to use people to do this.

      Unlike Mr Rudd, the NIDA finishing school Oscar nominee PM Gillard has an obedient red goanna gaze. Blood only flows through her veins when she gets the sunshine and heat from the Labor factions. The Socialist elite may have groomed her, but the majority intelligent will eventually expose and destroy her. She is just a mask and tool for the orchestrated destruction of Australian manufacturing and exports; family values; longer retirement implementation; death duties; increase of GST to 12-15%; GREATER DEBT and submission of the middle class and poor using enslaving sovereign debt that will take 30 years to pay off. Damn TREASON is the definition of these actions.

    • Reg says:

      07:36pm | 21/08/10

      Holy ****  grandma calm down. Yes it’s common knowledge that Philip Ruddock is supported by the only above ground cemetery in Australia.

    • Gregg says:

      01:40pm | 21/08/10

      Rudd’s already a goner no matter what happens for
      . Labor win well enough and Shortie, Howe and mob will be telling Julia his bags are packed
      . They scrape in or there’s a hung parliament, there’ll still be the working together conflicts they can do without and secrets have a habit of escaping.
      . Libs win and he’s Therese’s houseman
      As for
      ``They just don’t trust him,’’ a well placed figure said.
      It’s more he’s just not one of the real tribe

      ” This level of enmity will come as a surprise to more distant onlookers who might expect that if Labor loses, he would be vindicated and Ms Gillard blamed. Her move on him viewed as a disastrous over-reaction to bad polls. “
      Well to those unread of Labor traits, traitors and Drovers Dogs it may be a surprise but Labor/Unions are traitors to those they represent by not being prepared to be honest about what a competitive global market place means for Australian workforces.
      How many people will need to lose their jobs before they wake up.

      ” So why do Labor MPs see it differently? Principally because any loss will be attributed not to the leadership change but to its aftermath and particularly, to a series of leaks which crippled Gillard’s campaign, costing it three weeks and causing voters to consider Tony Abbott seriously for the first time.”
      They’re so shallow ain’t they!
      ” Kevin Rudd, and some commentators, believe the switch to Gillard was the problem and that Mr Rudd would have done better than his replacement. According to this logic, voters saw the change as a damning self critique by Labor which of itself, rendered it unfit for office. “
      Too true and yet none of them seem to think their performance has anything to do with it!

    • The Family says:

      01:41pm | 21/08/10

      It is not what Rudd or Gillard has to loose.it is what we have to loose if Abbott is our next Howard.
      We have made plan in that case and there will be room for six more people in Australia as we go and spend holidays in our former country.The problem is that not many people can afford it.
      Good luck to us all.

    • Dee says:

      03:03pm | 21/08/10

      A measure of Kevin Rudd was seen this morning. After arranging for the media to interview him at 1pm at the Uniting Church at Norman Park polling station where he was to cast his vote he did another backflip at the speed of light when it was realised that the godfather of Matthew Fuller, (one of four fine, young blokes who were electrocuted during the insulation disaster) and his wife were holding photos of Matthew.  “I just want Mr Rudd to look him in the eyes,” Mr Blythe said. That, fellow voters, is the measure of the man.

    • DB says:

      03:55pm | 21/08/10

      Spot on Dee.  Rudd is a massive coward.  Labor did well to get rid of him.  Australia would do well to get rid of Labor.

    • Reg says:

      09:27pm | 21/08/10

      Yeah spot on Dee and just getting out to vote today probably caused innumerable old people to keel over and die. Small Business too has a lot to answer for, taking and charging for jobs they are not capable of performing with the required skill and safety. Hope of a quick profit can lead lots of people to take risks with their own lives and those of others. Personally I think your self-righteousness is short-sighted, but typically Liberal.  ummm you too DB.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      04:39pm | 21/08/10

      That is truly awful.  This family have lost a son, brother, godson and all he can do is run away from them because he does not possess one scintilla of moral courage or integrity.  If there are consequences for him of the dire kind if Labor lose this election, then it serves him right and he should just retire from public life altogether so we don’t have to see his face either.

    • xyz says:

      05:18pm | 21/08/10

      Julie, as you well know, the blame lies squarely with the greedy and incompetant employer, not with the government!

    • Dee says:

      09:01pm | 21/08/10

      I beg to differ, xyz.  The Rudd government was repeatedly warned after Matthew Fuller died of the problems and danger attached to manner in which they were handling the insulation debacle. They chose to ignore all of those warnings and consequently we lost another three outstanding young men. Of course there are also all the house fires which they chose to ignore as well. So you see the blame for the deaths lies with the Rudd government and their shoddy manner of handling things.

    • Reg says:

      09:41pm | 21/08/10

      Dee where do you see the right of Small Business to be allowed to manage and perform their task, unfettered by Government interference? This is the axiom of Liberal philosophy. Perhaps you need to consider the shoddy, (inept,) handling by Small Business when considering the lives of their workers and those for whom they pretend to efficiently undertake the work.

    • Dwgw says:

      05:29pm | 22/08/10

      Reg how dare you make such sweeping statements which have no basis in fact. I have been a Small business operator for 16 years with four different business. I take exception to your words that employers by deffinition are the Boogie Man.
      Life is lfe is life. There are good and bad people in all walks of life, even Labor party members or unionists, polce or clergy etc etc.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@Kittu64 That's true. Pretty sure I referred to "high salaried" women.

David Penberthy

@michelangeloruc not at all mate it is a great story and photo

tory_maguire

@nswpolice very polite and helpful officers manning the Pyrmont road closures this morning

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter