Hooray for Barnaby Joyce. I don’t actually agree with much the Nationals Senate leader has to say, but at least he’s saying it in an interesting way.

As well as being fun Barnaby Joyce is also an alternative energy source

In the political realm, he’s like a splash of bright puke-yellow on a beige lino floor.

In the daily ambush at the doors of Federal Parliament, where all the main players either try to slip through with a wan smile or stay resolutely “on message”, Joyce was asked about a survey that showed people think PM Kevin Rudd’s a massive tantrum-chucker. “The guy’s a psycho chook,” Joyce said.

“Who in their right mind gets onto a plane and because he doesn’t get the right colour birdseed has a spac attack?”

He was referring, of course, to the incident where Rudd reduced a flight attendant to tears because she failed to come up with reheated, reconstituted gunk on demand.

Joyce had to take back the “spac attack” bit after a complaint from the Spastic Centre, but the rest of it stands as a lovely little inventive outburst.

Political response far too often is a game of copy and paste, as MPs regurgitate policy documents for the consumption of a bored public.

The copy and paste function extends to press secretaries and department media, who struggle valiantly to mash key phrases together to answer earnest questions from journalists.

Joyce, though, just spouts stuff. He’s a self-styled maverick, a grinning country conservative. He linked climate change action to Nazism, for goodness’ sake!

His peers can fire up on occasion in the houses of Parliament, and the Independents have a bit more scope for creativity, but in the main they’re just highly trained pups jumping through the hoops. Behind the scenes they’re much more interesting, but the velvet rope to backstage is more of a barbed wire fence.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has said two interesting things during his reign. One was the apology to the Stolen Generation, which I found moving despite my determination to cling to cynicism. The other was the use of the word “shitstorm” – which he let slip while talking about the Global Financial Apocalypse - interesting because it appeared to be unscripted.

Sure, KRudd probably said it for political gain, to get kudos amongst those who thought he was just some grayscale nerd, but it still seemed like a flash of something real.
There’s been a devolution in personality in politics. Rather than survival of the fittest, it’s survival of the blandest.

People like and respect KRudd. They don’t love him. There’s no passion.

Even resident ranga Julia Gillard is disappointingly calm and controlled, as is Penny Wong, who sits outside the mainstream box in other regards.

Political pundits speak fondly of the wanton booziness of Hawke, the sharp smart-arsery of Keating, with nostalgia for a lost time. Old-school journos remember when you could get pissed with Members of Parliament, call them by their first name, even!

Of course the media are complicit in this gradual elimination of character. We pillory politicians – particularly, but not only females – any time they are less than circumspect.

Sure, chair sniffing deserves public contempt and a childish snigger, but we also ravage the slightest, most harmless deviation from robotic good behaviour.

Maybe we, like the public, are so bored to tears of practiced sermons, evasive answers and “weasel words” that we seize on anything that leaks out from the carefully cultivated edges.

My broader concern with the move towards inanity is the quality of people getting into politics.

Anyone with a remotely interesting life would have to be a brave soul indeed to expose themselves and their loved ones to the public life of a politician. We’ve gradually got to the point where it’s sort of OK to have inhaled, but that’s about it.

Pretty much everyone I know could picture how an Opposition (and the tabloids) would react to the whole truth of their past, and would rule out a political career because they just don’t want that righteous judgement.

Which means a whole lot of smart, forward-thinking, altruistic and passionate people will not enter an industry that would benefit immensely from their presence, leaving the path clear for hard-headed and ambitious power gropers.

It’s a giant shame with no easy solution, except that we need to look for a path between offensiveness and political correctness that allows spirited and open debate, and even a bit of personality now and then.

6 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.C. says:

      07:37am | 04/06/09

      Having a spaz attack over somebody using the words ‘spaz attack’ is political correctness gone mong.

    • Mark M Aldridge Independent says:

      09:31am | 04/06/09

      It appears there are very few polly’s that can speak their minds, with out having first to consider their Party’s position. Most party pollys are stiffled by the swine flu mask their partys ensure they wear. LOL

      Love or hate the minor parties and Independents at least they can say what is on their minds, and in some cases even their conscience, albeit with out much thought at times he he he he.

      It is a huge shame that all those chosen to represent us couldnt be a liitle more relaxed and open minded, well that’s 2 party politics for you.

    • David C says:

      11:26am | 04/06/09

      Which shows that we should never allow anyone that wants to be a politician to become one.

    • stephen says:

      04:17pm | 04/06/09

      Politics should be a part-time job for most portfolios, with the exception of, say, the Parliamentary front bench. The bulk of Ministers should, therefore, be drawn from the general community, elsewhere employed in their professions. This would make for a much more interesting political life in this country, and we could then all look forward to the the next gaffe with joy.

    • zebadiah81 says:

      05:17pm | 04/06/09

      The whole system of ‘democracy’, as it is currently being played out in Australian politics at the moment, is an archaic system, pre-dating even the Wright bother’s invention of the aeroplane, let alone the invention of television, computers and the internet.

      The reality of the 2 party system of government that we have today is ridiculously outdated in this digital age of instant gratification.  Neither of the 2 political parties even comes close to representing my views on any of the topics that are affecting me and my family, and yet I have to choose one of them, and then put up with that choice, regardless of changing circumstances, for the next 3 years.

      We have the technology to replace this whole bureaucratic nightmare with a simple computerized system that could enable everyone to vote on any issue, and to change their vote with changing circumstances.  No longer would we need the farcical “question time” – if you need to know something, look at the figures on the web site.  If you disagree with the figures, leave a comment.  If you like the idea, click the “yes” button.  If you don’t, click the “no” button.

      I know that people are basically lazy when it comes to voting, so the system could allow us to appoint a party as our proxy, allowing our vote to be cast by them – and when that party starts to make decisions we don’t like, we could re-assign our proxy to another.

      The system could show the statistics of different parties, how they voted on different subjects, and the party leaders could be chosen not by their command of the language and rhetorical speeches, but by their qualifications and experience on the given topics.

      If you like this idea, click the YES button.  grin

    • Cliff says:

      08:18pm | 04/06/09

      Get real. It’s what people say that matters, how they succeed in their quite serious and important jobs, not how amusing or media rich what they say is. Barnaby is a drongo, terrified about a double dissolution an losing his seat. He has to draw attention to himself fast!
      Some journalists have been failing to do their jobs and taking on being entertainers for so long they have forgotten what they should be doing!
      And when it comes to “boring robot MPs” I’d rather have a leadership line up that is hard working, articulate and accountable than the bunch of spin merchants, deniers and bunglers that we’re thrown out at the last election. Who could be more robotic than Mr Andrews, the great Haneef bungler?
      Someone’s political bias is clouding their judgements! And it’s not mine!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @bencubby: This Estonian chap is a bit of a superstar (has anyone ever said that before?) #SBSeurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

@MelanieTait I was thinking the same thing!

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter