New Guinea, geographically as well as historically, is Australia’s closest relative. Separated from the mainland during the last glacial period, the waters filled-in what now separates them: 150km of the Torres Strait. 

Rio Tinto's Freeport mine in West Papua.

Despite being endowed with enviable mineral stores, economic and political exploitation has left New Guinea housing many of the poorest people on earth – particularly in the western half of West Papua. 

Amidst a program toward independence from the Dutch, the international community neglected West Papua in order to realise a business deal between U.S. mining company Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (“Freeport”) and Soeharto – at the time an Indonesian army general. 

The deal granted a jointly-owned company, PT Freeport Indonesia (“Freeport-Indonesia”), full rights to prospect a ‘mountain of ore’ now known as the Grasberg complex.  In return, Indonesia would derive significant tax revenues and fees as well as a minority 9.36 percent shareholding. 

Observing the Grasberg mine via Google Earth, one sees a scar on the earth like no other: located four thousand metres above sea-level, open-pit (above ground) mining has bore a hole through the top of the mountain a kilometre wide.  What they’re digging for is more than US$40 billion worth of copper and gold.  Everyday, the operation discharges 230,000 tonnes of tailings (waste rock) into the Aghawagon River below.  This process is expected to continue for a further six years, at which point, exploration will go underground until there’s no value left.  Freeport estimates they’ll be done by 2041.

Now recognised as one of the most corrupt and tyrannical leaders in history, President Soeharto renewed Freeport-Indonesia’s exclusive mining rights in 1991 for a further 30 years with an option of two 10-year extensions.  The licence included an option to prospect another 2.6 million-hectares, as far as the Papua New Guinea border. 

Enter Rio Tinto. 

In February 1995, Rio Tinto announced a few deals that secured access into Grasberg.  First, they agreed to invest US$500 million of new capital in Freeport for a 12 percent stake in the U.S. miner’s business. 

Second, Rio Tinto agreed to finance a US$184 million expansion of the Grasberg mine.  In return, they received a 40 percent of post-1995 production revenue that exceeded certain output targets, and from 2021 a 40 percent stake in all production.  And third, Rio Tinto would receive 40 percent of all production from new excavations elsewhere within West Papua. 

By October 1995 an independent U.S. government agency had cancelled Freeport’s international political risk insurance.  The insurer, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, specifically cited the Grasberg mine operation as contravening the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, which required that “overseas investment projects do not pose unreasonable or major environmental hazards or cause the degradation of tropical forests”. 

As Soeharto’s reign came to an end, an increasing number of West Papuans also began to campaign against the environmental and social impact of Grasberg.  Papuan leaders brought the matter before the U.S. Federal District Court in April 1996 and later the Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the U.S. House of Representatives in May 1999. 

Then in August 2002 two American teachers and an Indonesian employed by Freeport-Indonesia were murdered at the Grasberg mine complex.  Following one rebel’s admission that he was a business partner of the Indonesian military, a revelation that might violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, it was later revealed that Freeport was incurring costs of US$5 million per annum for government-provided security of the Grasberg complex and staff, and fluctuating annual costs reaching US$12 million for unarmed, in-house security costs. 

On 23 March 2004, Rio Tinto announced it had sold its 11.9 percent shareholding in Freeport.  Rio Tinto made a $518 million profit.  Citing no environmental or social reasons, Rio Tinto’s then chief executive Leigh Clifford reassured shareholders that “the sale of [Freeport] does not affect the terms of the joint venture nor the management of the Grasberg mine” and that through “our significant direct interest in Grasberg, we will continue to benefit from our relationship with Freeport”. 

Rio Tinto remained committed to the mining of Grasberg, and would continue overseeing its management through various operating and technical committees. 

Alarmingly, as recently as 2008, fundamental human rights violations such as the “torture, excessive use of force and unlawful killings by police and security forces” have been confirmed by the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on Human Rights Defenders, Amnesty International, and United Nations Committee against Torture.

“There is no alternative to our reliance on the Indonesian military and police”, Freeport chairman James Moffett wrote to the New York Times in 2005, “The need for this security, the support provided for such security, and the procedures governing such support, as well as decisions regarding our relationships with the Indonesian government and its security institutions, are ordinary business activities”. 

Curiously, both Rio Tinto and Freeport position themselves in annual ‘sustainable development’ reports as socially responsible businesses.  We’re told Freeport were pioneers in recognising the land rights of the Amungme and Kamoro people, paving the way to compensation and dialogue since 1974, and an updated Memorandum of Understanding in 2000.  We find that 14 “invalid and unsubstantiated” land rights claims were made against the company globally in their 2008 report, and that steps are being taken to better process them in future.  And we are told Rio Tinto and Freeport set aside one percent of net revenues from the Grasberg complex which has enabled the indigenous Amungme and Kamoro people “to become equity participants in the mine” since 1996.  But we find the indigenous people are told, “the river upstream will largely recover naturally”. 

The story of West Papua reminds us is that the global financial crisis was not caused by the limits of “extreme capitalism” as Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd suggests his government can control, but the rampant and uncontrollable nature of capitalism itself; nearly all of Australia’s financial institutions are invested in Rio Tinto, and the federal government’s $60 billion Future Fund don’t disclose what they are invested in whatsoever.  They decide what’s a ‘good investment’, and in the absence of transparency and accountability, Australians just have to trust what they’re doing is ethical. 

- Nicholas A.J. Taylor is principal of Taylor McKellar, an international political risk consultancy, and a lecturer at La Trobe University.

The full text of this article can be found here.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Twitter and Facebook

Most commented

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:15am | 27/05/10

      The situation is not due to “the rampant and uncontrollable nature of capitalism itself”, as Mr Taylor claims. This is proven by the vast majority of well-managed industrial operations in the developed world - occasional accidents aside.

      Rather, the situation is caused by third-world government corruption, tribal rivalry, and the general shoddiness of regulation in undeveloped countries.

      Capitalism is the most efficient means of obtaining and distributing resources, when it is subject to reasonable constraints. Academic hand-wringing and ivory tower theories aside, this will always be the case so long as scarcity exists.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:37am | 27/05/10

      Eric,
      You don’t really believe what you have posted, do you?

      Even a cursory look at history would suggest third world countries have been raped by first world countries. Sadly it is still going on.

      I know you will not admit it Eric, but even this country is suffering, although not to the same extent. More of our mineral wealth goes off shore than stays here. But you are right in one regard, “Capitalism is the most efficient means of obtaining wealth”. What can be more eficient than terminating your opposition?

    • AntiMajorMistakes or Others Man says:

      08:36am | 27/05/10

      @ Eric & JAN, your both half right & half wrong.

      Look at how the Whitlam government betrayed the East Timorese? For much the same reasons, East Timor, at the time had some of the worlds last, best stands of Sandalwood & other forestry products, as well as, their end of the north west shelf.

      Corrupt locals sided with the corrupt Indonesian Generals to rape the forest, while “fair go Gough” did nothing.

      Australian journalists were murdered, along with non corrupt locals who wanted independence & it was eventually set right by John Howard.

      However 2 wrongs don’t make a right, as evil, incompetent, corrupt, the red/green/getup/labour coalition is, we must pressure the liberal/national coalition to do better, by only preferencing them, after supporting real minor parties & independents.

      http://www.democrats.org.au/

      http://www.australiafirstparty.com.au/cms/

      http://www.ldp.org.au/

      Regards the former snag & swinging voter

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      10:35pm | 27/05/10

      Hello Eric, thank you for engaging in this issue. 

      The Freeport and Rio Tinto example I use is a well-known issue for corporate governance providers.  That is, the decision of Rio Tinto to enter into business with Freeport-McMoRan and the Indonesian Government of 1995 not only displays a liberal reading of the political risk involved, but also deeper corporate governance failings within the management of Rio Tinto. 

      Go well,
      Nicholas

    • hugo says:

      08:18am | 27/05/10

      Well put Eric

      Another jab at the “evils” of Western societies and capitalism.

    • Boofhead says:

      08:46am | 27/05/10

      Sounds like I should buy some Rio Tinto shares. Thanks for the tip.

    • AdamC says:

      09:46am | 27/05/10

      Such a long post that says very little. Nicholas, what do you advocate should happen to this mine? Why do you single out Freeport and its corporate partners (like Rio Tinto) as the chief villains? Certainly, West Papua would have been annexed by Indonesia with or without a mine. Indonesia’s designs on Irian Jaya were/are primarily nationalistic, not financial. And how do miners control national militaries and their excesses? What should they do about it, exactly?

      This is a typical, politics faculty over-simplification of complex issues for the sake of blaming corporations, capitalism, westerners and white males (just put E – all of the above) for every world evil. The persistence of anti-capitalist (whether Marxist or post-Marxist) ideologies among global governing elites is one of the reason the development problems of the 1960s remain today. Foreign investment and free markets are not bad for development, they are good.

    • Economist says:

      10:35am | 27/05/10

      Adam C I have to say I’m pretty disappointed with yoru response. The article clearly outlines the history, quite briefly inactual fact, of this project.

      I also don’t see it as anti-capitalism, more responsible capitalism. Do you think the West Papau people are getting a fair return on their land? Would you tolerate this in your own backyard? Yes free markets and foreign investment are good, but clearly this is only the case when everyone has equal rights.

      As for your question as to what should happen to the mine, well how about Rio stand up to Indonesia’s corrupt elite and out in place geniune programs and polocies to compensate and raise the living standards of the West Papua people. How about they take responsbility for their actions. Your comment seems to justify that mistreatment and murdering of a people is OK in the name of economic growth because that’s just the way the world is, well why should we accept this? It a typical vacious Conservative liberal response and demonstrates that you have no knowledge of sustainable economic growth, limited resources and value for money. I think you should be grateful that you live in a society where government legislates to protect your rights and the environment we live in rather than throw you to the, as you put it, E-all of the above.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      03:02pm | 27/05/10

      I focused on Grasberg because that is a story that needs to be told. Tomorrow I might write about a bank. 

      As for foreign direct investment, I’ve not suggested it’s a bad thing.  In fact, I consult to the investment industry and government on such matters from either an ethical or risk perspective - which ever is relevant to the case at hand. 

      Go well,
      Nicholas

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      03:07pm | 27/05/10

      Economist, thanks for your thoughtful comments.

    • Andrew says:

      10:22am | 27/05/10

      The best thing I can say about this “story” is it isn’t worthy of acomment from me. Yaaawwwwwn…..........

      Did the big bad capitalists steal your lollies? there, there diddums.

    • Peter says:

      12:17pm | 27/05/10

      They are trying to steal your lollies Andrew and claim them as their own… There is only one group of people that lie more than politicians, and they all work for our major corporations… Hail they liar!! That seems to be a classic western trait…

    • Steve_of_Cornubia says:

      10:41am | 27/05/10

      Don’t worry Kevin, here comes Nicholas to your rescue!

    • Willy_K says:

      10:51am | 27/05/10

      Oh boy.  Another tired sad assault on big bad capitalism.  Which but for it you would be scratching this blog out on a pebble.

      You need to get a life and some perspective Taylor.  Utter dribble.

    • Kerry says:

      01:54pm | 27/05/10

      Yep Willy… big ‘bad’ capitalism (aka ‘big bad capitalists’) is largely responsible for the financial mess the world is in today. You may yet be reduced to scratching future blogs on a rock wall in the not too distant future.

    • Willy_K says:

      03:04pm | 27/05/10

      You don’t have the slightest grasp of economics or reality do you Kerry?

      Market intervention was responsible for the US housing bubble that caused the GFC not capitalism.  Clinton allowed people with no means to purchase homes.  What a disaster.

      Do some research.

    • Peter says:

      03:23pm | 27/05/10

      If you want to get a good idea of what capitalism is about, you shoud watch the documentery on “Enron - the smartest guys in the room” and then a nice follow up to that is Sicko by Mike Moore.. Tell me what you think of capitalism once you watch those two doco’s…

    • JR says:

      03:49pm | 27/05/10

      Actually no Kerry it was government intervention which cause the sub-prime mortgage crisis in America.

      Peter suggesting Willy watch a Micheal Moore ‘Documentary’. May as well suggest he watch a Ridley Scott movie. Want a good Micheal Moore doco, watch Manufacturing Dissent.

    • Economist says:

      06:16pm | 27/05/10

      Please Will K don’t pretend to be an Economist. Clinton was not the cause of the GFC.

    • Bruce Nesbitt says:

      03:28pm | 29/05/10

      ‘Economist’  Market interference by govt specifically that by Clinton - was the major reason the US had the housing credit crash which triggered the GFC.

      That is cold hard fact.  To even attempt to blame the capitalist system is so dumb and simplistic it is breathtaking.

      You might also want to change your moniker.

    • Neil says:

      10:57am | 27/05/10

      Nicholas, great article.  I appreciate the information and facts in the article as opposed to the unsubstantiated opinon that is now standard for Australian journalism.
      I expect we will see much unsubstantiated opinon in the replies from those who will dislike the article.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      01:01am | 28/05/10

      Thanks, Neil.  Interesting array of responses given it’s hosted by News Limited.

    • Harquebus says:

      11:49am | 27/05/10

      Gough Whitlam was a wimp for allowing Indonesia to capture West Papua.

    • Peter says:

      02:15pm | 27/05/10

      And what was Gough going to do? Send our entire 2,500 armed services to stop them?

    • Tails A. Bearderson says:

      11:56am | 27/05/10

      I’m going to grow a beard and use my middle initial more often. It might give my commentary more gravitas too. Tanks for the tips Nicko.

    • Saskia says:

      12:26pm | 27/05/10

      How about you propose an alternative Nick?  It is so easy to sit back and hang sh!t on a system that has got you to where you are today.  It is also very boring.

      Whats the alternative?  Green socialism?  Communism?

      Come on give us something apart from jaded cynicism, self-loathing, whinging and hate.

    • Dognuts says:

      01:37pm | 27/05/10

      Fair dinkum you are a twit. If you bother to read this, there is no call for an ‘alternative’. The article merely points out that if making money involves killing and displacing people and helping to prop up corrupt authorities, then that is an awful price to pay for profit. There is nothing wrong with capitalism per se, it is a system that best rewards the efforts put in. But when you allow your love of that reward to override normal moral and ethical standards, then that is where capitalism starts to fall over

    • Saskia says:

      02:51pm | 27/05/10

      I think you are talking with your mouth full of your name. 

      Sadly I read this awful twaddle which slanders a good company, all of its employees, managers and investors.  What a champion.

      If there is a problem then it is with corrupt locals.  Perhaps Taylor should grow a pair of your name and have the your name to have a go at Indonesia, and even Whitlam who allowed them to take WP lock stock and barrel and turned a blind eye to scores of murders including Australians.

      Doesn’t fit in with the anti-US/Capitalism/Conservative/Business/Liberal/Anglo-Saxon/Male/Investor group-think though does Mr Dognuts?

      If you haven’t any solutions then you are part of the problem.

    • Willy_K says:

      02:56pm | 27/05/10

      I agree.  Its so easy for these University educrats with their thesis’ on some obscure pointless topic to sit back in their ivory towers and spray poo all over companies and workers while being paid by the taxpayer.

      Where are the ideas?  Anyone can hate.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      02:57pm | 27/05/10

      I left the investment industry two and a half years ago to offer an alternative - I teach and consult.  A little hard in 800 words to identify an issue, support it with evidence, and talk through “alternatives”. 

      If you read closely, I make a simple point that you’ve missed: the GFC was not caused by “extreme capitalism” (as put forward by Rudd) or “isolated corruption” (as put forward by Bush), but is a systemic issue with our economic system.

      Go well,
      Nicholas

    • Willy_K says:

      03:32pm | 27/05/10

      It was actually caused by Clinton’s interference in the market to attempt to have people to be able to own their own homes - despite the fact that they were completely without means to repay the loans.  A non-corrupted market would never have lent this money.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      02:50pm | 28/05/10

      Saskia,

      Rio Tinto had faced a litany of signposts indicating that Grasberg was not meeting various standards, laws and norms: by institutions such as the World Bank, Australian Council for Overseas Aid, International Finance Corporation, Overseas Private Investment Commission, United Nations Committee against Torture, U.S. State Department, and the Indonesian Environment Ministry, as well as many U.S. and European politicians, independent environmental assessments, international media, Papuan leaders, civil society groups, and shareholder speeches and resolutions. 

      The $350 billion Norwegian Government Pension Fund has also blacklisted Rio Tinto (2008) and Freeport-McMoRan (2006) over this case following more than 15 months of research and dialogue.  These documents are readily available on their website:  http://www.regjeringen.no/en/sub/styrer-rad-utvalg/ethics_council/Recommendations/Recommendations.html?id=458700

      Thanks for engaging me on this issue.

      Nicholas

    • Sebastian G. R. V. Spencer-Churchill III says:

      12:42pm | 27/05/10

      As I sit here on my Apple MacBook typing whilst sipping on my latte made fresh on my personal coffee machine and look out over the inner city balcony of my week house I feel sad for all the poor dark people happily working to provide money for their families and improving their personal esteem and lot in life.  The evil capitalist companies forcing them to work in decent conditions and forcing them to live in company provided housing makes my blood boil.

      Why can’t we all live free in the forest away from the evil of capitalism where butterflies and birds flit silently around our naked bodies?

    • Kim says:

      01:45pm | 27/05/10

      I can understand why some people may crticise an article about the pitfalls of capitalism, but I still believe that these articles are important and necessary. We need to know what the hell is happening up there in the mountains of West Papua, so clsoe to our own shores.

    • Wood B. Butcher says:

      01:46pm | 27/05/10

      sounds like they need a super profits tax, that should fix it…

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      11:35pm | 27/05/10

      Yep, lets ban mining & let the bastards freeze in the dark! !

    • Peter says:

      02:50pm | 27/05/10

      Western society worships liars.

    • jim says:

      01:12am | 28/05/10

      We know it’s wrong… so whats the problem?
      Ignorance is not bliss, when justice has been implanted into all of us. We’ll all face it, that everything we use will come from corruption. The lack of transparency and red-tape.

      This is one of the reasons why I think Google is the future, though not related, they have the power to create transparency. Simply by looking at that satellite image.

      It’s good to believe God whilst you still can. Knowing that Justice will be served and not ignored.

    • Jim says:

      09:30am | 28/05/10

      Geez mate, you want a soapbox to stand on? Your article makes no sense, it’s like you’re wringing your hands together and trying to convince yourself that since Rio Tinto’s a big company, they must be evil. Do Rio have the same issues in South America? Mongolia? Australia? North America? Europe? Southern Africa? I guess not. Did you fail to read that Rio have also pulled out of massive projects in Sierra Leone - dropping billions - in protest against the regimes running the place at the time? Or you just omit that as it goes against the picture you’re trying to paint? Here’s a thought; maybe there’s something in the fact that all mining in PNG, West Papua and Indonesia turn ugly, maybe it’s to do with, I don’t know…these places being the most corrupt places on the planet? But then that logic may fail you…stick with your yawn-worthy ideology mate.

    • John A Neve says:

      10:38am | 28/05/10

      Jim,
      A little research on you part would show thare are many places in the world where large mining companies are screwing the local people.
      You have named some of them in your post.

      If you are fair dinkum, you would have to admit large mining companies are advantage of all of us, to a greater of lesser degree.

    • Jim says:

      12:47pm | 28/05/10

      I’ve been in mining for 20 years John, working all over the world. I think I know what I’m talking about. To single out a company that is a world leader (in mining circles) when it comes to community, human rights and the environment over one brief dalliance in an extremely corrupt country, and where the damage had already been done BY that countries government is just a fluffy, ill considered piece that would be more at home as a social science essay.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      08:45pm | 28/05/10

      Yes, Jim: “In mining circles”. 

      Go well,
      Nicholas A.J. Taylor

    • Samuel says:

      09:33pm | 29/05/10

      I am surprised at how many of these comments seem to be concerned only with fuelling the tiresome polar debate between government intervention and capitalim. This really only overlooks and oversimplifies the issues concerned.

      Taylor, in such a short number of words it seemed your objective was more focused towards raising awareness about a specific case, in relation to ESG and the moral hazards within investment. 

      I also saw the article as making broader points about the dangers of misconcieving the GFC as being either completely a result of “extreme capitalism” or “isolated corruption”.

    • Keith says:

      01:40pm | 30/05/10

      Mate… and your point is? Rio Tinto’s 12% stake in Freeport doesn’t even assume control of the mine site. An entity requires over 50% in shareholdings to be in control.  From what I see, it’s only an investment that is injecting capital to assist Freeport’s operations.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      11:21pm | 30/05/10

      Keith, the point was highlight the flaw in commonly-held logic like yours.  In the absence of absolute “control”, does one not have a “responsibility”?

      Put another way, say you drive within the speed limit, and realise as you’re taking a corner, that the road is caked in ‘black ice’.  The car begins to slide, and with little “control” over it, you slide off the road and damage a parked car.  Would you take any “responsibility” or drive off?

      The two concepts are not mutually exclusive.  Simple as that. 

      Go well,
      Nicholas Taylor

    • Keith says:

      01:16pm | 31/05/10

      Nick. Since you’ve spent so many years in the investment industry, tell me have you ever been a shareholder in mining companies? Have you ever held any shares in financial institutions who were also shareholders of these companies? If you did, did you take any responsibility with your little ‘control’?

      Sure 12% is a significant holding, but it still doesn’t mean control. Rio still cannot get votes to go their way when faced against 88%. As someone who’s worked in the investment industry, you should know this very well.

      FYI, I’d get my insurance company to pay for the damages.

    • Nicholas A.J. Taylor says:

      11:34pm | 31/05/10

      Hi Keith,

      Rio Tinto held a share in Freeport-McMoRan (US) for some years - it was eventually sold along with their proportional representation on the Board, but their stake in Freeport (Indonesia) was retained in order to continue to access the Grasberg mine. 

      Despite this change in arrangement, Rio Tinto do continue to sit on various operating and management committees related to the Grasberg mine.  So they do influence how it is run. 

      I have never held individual stocks, and I have my superannuation with an ethical super fund that excludes Rio Tinto.  I’ve written and spoken extensively on this issue here over the years: http://najtaylor.com 

      Go well,
      Nicholas A.J. Taylor

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

RT @leysie: Kate Legge on the last days of Hazel Hawke and Bob's farewell serenade. Warning: it will make you cry. http://t.co/iBDFBw74DJ

ToryShepherd

@TomRichardson @891adelaide That one is definitely a keeper #misheardlyrics

ToryShepherd

@TammyMLC @891adelaide @matt_gilbertson Oh I much prefer a gherkin to a virgin #misheardlyrics#springgully

ToryShepherd

“@JessAdamson7: @jhwakelin I like Grace's version. I learned the hard way Alex the Seal was actually Our Lips Are Sealed”#misheardlyrics

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter