In October 2010, Syria’s heavy-weight ambassador Tammam Sulaiman left Australia a disappointed man. He had failed to convince Australia to reopen our embassy in Damascus.

It's a country too, not just a building. Picture: AAP

In 2008-10 Syrians were very anxious that Australia bolster its credibility building exercise with the United States. Just before the beginning of the Arab Spring, President Obama had very unwisely reopened an American diplomatic post in Syria. 

Looking back it’s hard to re-imagine the Middle East before the successful revolutions against authoritarian leaders in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Then, the received wisdom in Western foreign policy circles was that Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad was a “man we could do business with”. Democrats would now be horrified to recall the prevailing view in Western chanceries that this “London” ophthalmologist and his glamorous wife (who subsequently appeared in Vogue magazine) was a closet democrat.

As I persistently warned at the time, especially after the (then) Liberal Foreign Minister’s 2003 decision to allow the opening of a Syrian embassy in Canberra, this was a delusional diplomatic miscalculation. In fact the Syrian Mission in Australia spends much of its time monitoring Australia’s Lebanese community.

How that is in Australia’s interest I leave to the Arabists in DFAT to explain. Now, more than a year after the fall of Mubarak and Gaddafi was beaten to death on television, the longest insurgency in the Arab Middle East sees nearly 10,000 civilians dead in the streets of Syrian towns Deraa, Homs and Aleppo.

It used to be said that only the US vetoed resolutions at the UN Security Council, and then usually to oppose condemnatory resolutions against its ally Israel. Now, the world decries Russia and China for their veto of the Arab League proposal for the resignation of Assad and a negotiated settlement to the Syrian crisis.

When he was in Sydney last month, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov certainly gave me the impression that, unlike the fickle West, Putin would stick with his Syrian client to the end. But Russia won’t get the last word. Even at the UN, Syria’s brutality is being denounced by Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and the General Assembly’s Human Rights leader Nava Pillay.

Europe has imposed further sanctions. After its almost comedic month-long, on the ground ‘investigation’ in Syria, that somehow managed to make things worse, now the Arab League now demands action from the international community despite Russia’s Syrian veto. Indeed Arab states have kicked out Damascus diplomats from several Middle East countries!

This past week in Tunis, an international “contact group” convened to assist an Arab intervention in Syria despite the Security Council’s inaction. The participating 60 states, including Australia, (represented by Secretary of DFAT Dennis Richardson) could only reach a modest consensus on a final declaration which agreed to tougher sanctions.

Yet for all the international goodwill, there was heated debate and a weak support for the establishment of “humanitarian corridors” into the conflict zone and no agreement for military intervention. Some Arab states, including host Tunisia, put a proposal for an Arab peacekeeping force.

If it happens it will be without the support of the UN, where inevitably any request by the Arab League for a UN mandated force to separate the warring parties will be met by another Putin/Hu Jintao “Nyet” in the Security Council.

It is of course unfashionable to invoke what I regard as a just cause, but one cannot ignore the palpable differences in the treatment of the current Syrian crisis and that of Israel following the Gaza exercise of early 2009. In the Gaza conflict some 1,400 people died, 750 admitted by Hamas to be either police or armed combatants.

Remarkably, Israel’s did not respond militarily until some 8,000 Hamas rockets were launched from Gaza, all aimed at Israeli cities. That response brought swift international condemnation. How galling it is for those of us who support democratic Israel to witness the relative inaction of the international community to the mass murder in Syria.

Where are the street demonstrations, where are the impassioned ads in newspapers, where are the protest ships sailing beneath flags of freedom? On Q&A comedian Austen Tayshus repeatedly asked the hard left Greens Senator Rhiannon where he might join the convoys sailing the Mediterranean to support the victims of the Syrian carnage? He is still waiting for an answer.

Israel is the victim of an inverse calculation that sees it excoriated ever more often and ever more loudly as the threats to its survival increase.

But not even authoritarian dictatorships can survive the distorting gaze of the backward telescope of CNN, the BBC and Al Jazeera. No regime, however secretive, Stalinist, or with the support of substantial minorities, can sustain the military suppression of a civilian uprising. Bashar’s father, Hafez, was a far worse butcher, killing, according to the Swiss Red Cross, 20,000 people in the Syrian city of Hama in 1982.

At that time the Ba’athist regime, facing an earlier Islamist uprising, used massed artillery batteries to reduce by grid the centre of that city. You can’t do this in the days of CNN, YouTube and handheld cameras.

Frankly I am politically indifferent to the equally obnoxious competing ideologies of some of the Syrian opposition and the holdouts of this dying Ba’athist regime. Let us have no illusions about the Free Syrian Army or some of the Islamist elements that will try to take over in Damascus. Yet it was less than 5 years ago that Ehud Olmert, to his enduring credit, flattened a North Korean built nuclear plant in northern Syria.

The Alawi/Ba’athist/Assad regime has shown an enduring and demonic hatred for Israel, refusing even the most generous Israeli peace offers, including the return of the Golan Heights to the edge of Lake Tiberias. It operates as a vassal state of Russia and provides crucial support for terrorists in Hezbollah and strategic depth for the Mullahs in Tehran.

However, as humanitarians we should hope and demand that the civilian slaughter ends. The sooner Assad and the Ba’athists are removed the better, and as an added consequence both Iran and Hezbollah, deadly enemies of Israel and the West, will be thrown into confusion. It may even derail Iran’s march to the weaponisation of its increasingly refined uranium.

We should note the advice of former Israeli national security adviser and Mossad chief Efraim Halevy, who believes that the crucial question for Israel is not whether Assad falls, but the dismantling of Iran’s ongoing influence in Syria.

Finally we should keep an eye on Turkey. The Turks are Sunni Muslims, like the majority of the Syrian population. They are geographically adjacent to Syria and have long standing territorial claims on Alexandretta (part of Syria).

If the Turkish army was to intervene, or even to agree to use the NATO base in Incirlik to establish a no fly zone over northern Syria, the days of Bashar and his Ba’athists would be quickly numbered. From there we should hope that Tunisian style democrats will emerge from the new Sunni ascendency.

They can’t be worse than the current mob.

Michael Danby is the Federal Labor MP for Melbourne Ports.

Most commented

39 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Fiddler says:

      06:17am | 02/03/12

      Funny how lefties demand that we intervene and then as was seen in yesterdays posts about Ben Roberts-Smith will then call us invaders etc

    • Nathan says:

      06:59am | 02/03/12

      hahaha Lefties my ass this is an opinion held by people on both sides of politics. Direct from the Liberal website: http://liberal.org.au/Latest-News/2011/08/02/Julie-Bishop-Address-to-Free-Syria-event.aspx

      I don’t think we should intervene in Syria but Iraq and Afghanistan where Ben Robert-Smith served are different situations to the ones seen here. Iraq an Afghanistan required an occupation this does not, people are asking for help, Iraq and Afghanistan where invaded (not saying we should or shouldn’t off gone).

    • acotrel says:

      07:59am | 02/03/12

      ‘Reaching out to Syria was a delusional miscalculation’

      Could not the same be said about invading Iraq ?

    • Nathan says:

      06:23am | 02/03/12

      “They can’t be worse than the current mob”
      Well that is yet to be shown or even the possibility to be demonstrated. In the west we watch these terrible atrocities but have no understanding of the background to them. The west cannot solve every countries problems and they don’t want us to

    • Greg says:

      05:21pm | 02/03/12

      The West does not even try to “solve every countries problem”.

      It just intervenes to do what is best for Israel.

    • Nathan says:

      03:25am | 03/03/12

      @Greg
      It is a shame but i think you have a point

    • John says:

      07:55am | 02/03/12

      The west is behind the Syrian uprising just like they were behind the Libyan one. The dead in Libya and Syria rests on the hands of western leaders who fund it covertly and support it. They trying to take out Syria by funding a phoney uprising just like in Libya in order to get to Iran. I suspect the western leadership are getting orders from Israel.

      Israel being the core of the guilty party that cause’s death and destruction in the middleast. If russia and china didn’t VETO then Israel would of got it’s no fly zone over Syria. If Israel persists with it’s aggressive foreign policy it’s going to cause WWIII which will end up with millions of Chinese, Westerns and Russian dead, all over a little criminal state called Israel.

    • Nathan says:

      08:08am | 02/03/12

      “The west is behind the Syrian uprising just like they were behind the Libyan one. The dead in Libya and Syria rests on the hands of western leaders who fund it covertly and support it.”
      Sorry i don’t follow are you saying the west is both behind the civilians and the government?

    • Bruno says:

      11:44am | 02/03/12

      I do not agree with the manner in which John expressed his final sentence however there are things that I do not follow either. For e.g. I do not follow how we can send our troops to another country to “fight for their freedoms and rights” yet Australian companies send our jobs overseas because the workers in the countries that our jobs are sent to have less working rights and freedoms. I do not follow how we can expect to educate our kids when countries, prime ministers, presidents and business leaders are the biggest bullies. How can we improve our internal society when nations behave like gangs and leaders like gangsters. I do not follow how we can send a soldier to Afghanistan to fight for “their freedom of speech” yet we cannot jestly comment on a VC recipient who happens to be a specimen of a man.

    • Greg says:

      05:14pm | 02/03/12

      @Bruno, when it comes to Middle Eastern politics, the truth is never spoken or reported by our politicians or in our media. That is why there appears to be so much conflicting information.

      If you really want to follow what’s going on, you will have to find other sources of information.

      As for commenting on VC recipients, people can do that. And in case you hadn’t noticed, they recently did so.

      The freedom of speech was what allowed those who disagreed with what they said to respond.

      The denial of freedom of speech would resulted in the people who made offensive comments being taken to court. That happens too, in case you hadn’t noticed, but only for one side of the political spectrum.

    • Doc says:

      08:58pm | 02/03/12

      John, I think you need to take your meds before your ask mummy to borrow her computer next time! Dr Help

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      08:00am | 02/03/12

      Hi Michael,

      No offence intended to you but! Even the very people who have lived in the Middle East Region for centuries, don’t really have a true understanding of what is going on Syria, right now!  Yes, Turkish society is largely Sunni society like Syria.  However, actual comparisons stop there, for the most obvious reasons to everyone involved in the Middle East Region.

      And I honestly don’t think that Turkey will get involved in this very disturbing situation any time soon!  If countries such as Russia and China with vested interests in the region don’t seem to care, I truly don’t think that the situation in Syria will change for the better and very drastically overnight.

      Because it is rather complex, even the News Networks around the world and journalist don’t feel safe and besides the fact that are not allowed inside Syria. So who can actually tell us about what is really going on Syria besides the everyday reality of needless bloodshed and human suffering at its worst?

      Even the United Nations is feeling very powerless right now, at the very idea of sending humanitarian essential needs to the very people of Syria who actually need it desperately.  What hope does the rest of countries in the region have really to smooth things over so quickly, that every thing will go back to normal for the Syrian people anytime soon?

      Syria is considered to be Sovereign State.  May be it is high time that the world and United Nations, with a combined effort try to look in a very different direction, with a whole new attitude.  That is if they really want to help and ease this very serious situation of the mounting civilian casualties in Syria.  Kind regards to your editors.

    • subotic says:

      09:59am | 02/03/12

      “Even the very people who have lived in the Middle East Region for centuries, don’t really have a true understanding of what is going on”.

      Finally NESLIHAN KUROSAWA, something I agree on with you. Towel heads themselves pretty much have no idea about their own lands or peoples, and usually solve things by blowing themselves up. Which I fully agree with and support 100%.

      Let’s hope they finish the job soon…

    • Bertrand says:

      10:38am | 02/03/12

      @subotic - towel heads? Really.

      Oh well, at least you are straight up about your prejudices and don’t cloak your opinions with “I’m not racist, but…”

    • subotic says:

      12:10pm | 02/03/12

      Yeah Bertrand, nothing worse than dishonesty or gutlessness when it comes to so-called “personal opinion”.

      A spade is a spade, and a sand monkey is a sand monkey.

    • acotrel says:

      08:04am | 02/03/12

      How much say did our elected representatives in parliament have when our troops were sent to invade Iraq - must have been an emergency ?

    • subotic says:

      08:06am | 02/03/12

      Can’t we just leave the sand dwellers alone and let them sort their own crap out (i.e. blow themselves up to kingdom come), and once they’ve killed every man, woman and child in the Middle East the rest of the Free World can just march on in and get whatever the hell it is we need from that part of the planet.

      Realistically, if we leave the buggers alone for long enough, they really will just kill each other and the place will be up for grabs. They have NEVER been able to get along with themselves, NEVER, let alone each other as separate nations. So logically, let’s just leave them be for a second or two and they’ll snuff themselves and each other out. It’s poetically beautiful if you think about it.

      All too easy.

    • che says:

      11:21am | 02/03/12

      The same could be said for the human population of this whole planet. War is not just an Arab problem subotic. Oh and the Free World? What are you? George Bush?

    • acotrel says:

      08:07am | 02/03/12

      ‘Israel being the core of the guilty party that cause’s death and destruction in the middleast’

      Great Britain created the situation in Palestine , and they should solve it.

    • john says:

      08:29am | 02/03/12

      How can Israel solve Israels problems? Think about this, why is that Britain has supported all the bombings and invasions in middleast for Israel interests. They went after Saddam, they went to Afghanistan to surround Iran. I’m sure if the evil UN got their no fly zone, Britain would been the first one to bomb and kill thousands of Syrians. Yet we talk about how evil the Assad regime is, when the west who wiped out the Libyans with weapons of mass destruction.

      The west is so corrupt and skewed, it states it wants justice yet, commits the most injustice, hypocrites.

    • L. says:

      11:43am | 02/03/12

      “Yet we talk about how evil the Assad regime is, when the west who wiped out the Libyans with weapons of mass destruction.”

      What WMD’s would these be..? because for the life of me I can’t think of a single chemical, nuke or biological weapon used by the West forces in Lybia.

      Seriously, could you answer that? Because I’m betting you can’t.

    • Greg says:

      04:31pm | 02/03/12

      “What WMD’s would these be..? “

      I suppose that they would be exactly the same type of WMDs that Saddam Hussain had in Iraq.

    • Mark of Brisbane says:

      09:33am | 02/03/12

      And yet again neither China nor Russia, after vetoing UN action that could help stop the slaughter, are not made to account for the decision. The Lefties will ride every one of the USA’s interventions, but never question the motives of China and Russia who are doing so much damage. I would never expect a member of the Australian media to have enough of a club to write a story about it, but the rest of you are just foolish hypocrites.

    • Greg says:

      05:29pm | 02/03/12

      There was a lot more slaughter and damage done when Iraq was invaded on a false pretext, and none of the invaders have been held to account.

      It’s a pity that China and Russia did not veto that decision, but maybe they have at least learned from their mistake, unlike other countries.

      What was it that you were saying about hypocrits?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:55am | 02/03/12

      Strange article. Started off OK and then just went into a pro Israel and anti Muslim diatribe with no solutions but only to slag people/countries off. But Mr Danby is a Jew so wasn’t surprising in that sense.

      Syria won’t be solved anytime soon, the West can’t fix all the Middle Easts problems even though some were created by them. The Middle East will never be some place of unity and harmony.

      You overthrow Assad and then what? Same thing different person.

    • AdamC says:

      11:08am | 02/03/12

      Yeah, those pesky Jews again!

      All Danby was doing, Simon, was illustrating the double standard by which people treat the actions of Israel as compared to those of the Arab States. Your comment highlights my suspicion that this double standard is applied because Israel is populated primarily by Jews. Other people dispute this, but can never provide a better explanation.

      I don’t really get Danby’s wider point, though. On the one hand, he seems pretty unenthusiastic about Assad’s possible successors, on the other, he criticises Russia for not supporting ‘regime chnage’ measures. Me, I simply don’t care. Baby Assad, Sunni extremists, the Syrian army: they are all as bad as each other.

      The West made a grave error in assisting the overthrow of an increasingly pro-Western Gaddafi. They should just stay out of Syria.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      11:31am | 02/03/12

      @AdamC

      Take the paranoia cap of bud. The Jew reference was because he is Jewish so it wasn’t surprising that he was backing them even though it wasn’t related to a story - no different to a pro union piece by Ged or a pro Liberal piece of Sophie.

      “Your comment highlights my suspicion that this double standard is applied because Israel is populated primarily by Jews”

      TBH no one expects any better of Arabs Id say. Israel is a 1st world country with a bigger military and a higher support from Western Countries. The Palestinians have a few missiles and some rocks.

      Doesn’t really matter what I say, you and I will never agree.

    • Greg says:

      05:57pm | 02/03/12

      @ SimonFromLakemba, I think that some people have the paranoia cap super-glued on.

      Lucky that you didn’t mention that Alexander Gutman (aka Austen Tayshus) was also another pro-Israeli Jewish activist, or the conspiracy theorist accusations would have been coming thick and fast.

      But then again, who else but the Israeli lobby (and their puppets)  really cares if Assad is overthrown or not?

    • bruce says:

      10:42am | 02/03/12

      Deposing dictators and replacing them with Islamists via the ballot box has been very foolish. The region will have a pause, of sorts, then more bloodbaths. It is what Islam has always done. Polite fictions when dealing with Islam, are dangerous and useless. Sad but very true.

    • Roberto Hull says:

      03:40pm | 02/03/12

      A few points: 1) Australia is truly blessed to have at least a few MPs like Michael Danby willing to frankly speak about human rights issues in these ways 2) Syria’s vile tyranny will soon topple, making those who were desperate to prop up the regime looking rather foolish and 3) Syria’s regime will no doubt initially be replaced by maddies, initially as the place sorts itself out. But assuming that Arabs are incapable of instituting democracy in their way is a racist and foolish notion. Freedom’s contagious, just wait and see.

    • billy says:

      04:04pm | 02/03/12

      Roberto you have absolutely no ideal what you are talking about. I can guarrentee you that majority of people living in Syria are 100% behind the president. I have family living in Homs Syria and they cannot wait for the Army to kick out those who are causing problems and get back to what life was like. Did you know that Syria have some of the oldest Churches and religious artifact in the old, and if it wasnt for the current president the extremist would of taken them down. You try to build a church in Saudi, they will have you executed.

    • billy says:

      03:50pm | 02/03/12

      I lived in Syria in 2009 and it was the most friendly country I have ebery been to. Name me a country in the Middle east where a church and a mosque stand side by side without any issues. Can I build a church in Saudi, look at the violance againt Cristian in the other Arab countries.
      Did you know all the Christian in Syria support the Present. I can guantee you if the President falls all the Christain and Alawi will migrate to Lebanon.

    • marley says:

      06:16pm | 02/03/12

      “Name me a country in the Middle east where a church and a mosque stand side by side without any issues. “

      Turkey. And probably Israel. Maybe Jordan.

    • Doug says:

      04:09pm | 02/03/12

      Michael Danby is certainly right. Where are the BDS demos against Syria? Does Israel mow down 100 civilians a day, as Assad does. Last year I stood on the footpath in Jerusalem watching a 4000 strong Gay and Lesbian Pride march through an orthodox neighbourhood. Singling out and blamingt Israel while ignoring Syria is not rational but emotionally based.

    • Greg says:

      05:47pm | 02/03/12

      No, you are wrong. Michael Danby is only “right” on issues affecting Israel, on everything else he is hard left. The Greens noticed the hypocrisy, which is why the BDS demos were initiated.

      And yes, Israel has often mown down 100 civilians a day. Sometimes they facilitate even higher death rates, like with the Sabra and Shatila massacre. Then they ensure that the guilty are elected to Parliament.

      Not sure what your point is about the gay march in Jerusalem.

    • Rocko says:

      05:08pm | 02/03/12

      Michael Danby, you should know better by now: you can’t support two masters. Your article started off fine with the anti-violence theme before going straight into pro-Israel rhetoric we’ve heard another of from plenty of other pro-Israel lobby groups around the nation.

      Pick Israel or Australia and if it’s not Australia; then get out of parliament since you clearly don’t represent the Australian voters. Leave Syria to sort out their own internal affairs as they are an independent and sovereign nation. Just like Australia did when we sorted out our own sovereignty affairs when Stephen Smith expelled Israel representatives after stolen Australian passports were used for an assassination by Mossad. And heck, just like Israel does by having America veto any censoring of their actions by the UN.

      We don’t need another “intervention action” in the Middle East: we already have the quagmires of Iraq and Afganistan to deal with. While the Australian forces have made progress in both nations, we never should have invaded Iraq in the first place and Afganistan could have been a lot different if America had of finished what that started back when they covertly aided the defeat of Russian forces there in the 70-80s.

      The region will sort out their own troubles, just like with the Arab Spring movement. We’re not the policemen of the world and neither is anyone else.

      And if there’s anything we should do, we should replicate what was successfully done to aid in breaking the South Africa apartheid. That’s it.

    • cha cha says:

      08:54am | 04/03/12

      The key difference between Israel’s actions in Gaza in 2009 and Syria now is that Israel was taking action against a foreign militia in a disputed territory - you know this Michael. The analogy is misleading. On Israel, nothing and no-one can defend anything Israel does until it withdraws to the 1967 borders (I would prefer the 1948 border myself). On Syria, do you know that these rebel groups are not foreign terrorist backed or indeed have the support of the whole population? On your reasoning, the 54% of voters who on opinion polls support the Coalition would be entitled to take up arms and rebel against the Labor government and expect the support of the international community in doing so. Get real Michael. I am equally appalled by the brutality and needless bloodshed that has been perpetrated by Syria for decades in both Lebanon and now within its own borders, but don’t put forward silly arguments advancing Israel and calling for regime change.

    • Toros says:

      11:13am | 09/03/12

      Mr. NZ comment # 175:Overall, I like what Bassam Junied wrote, gholtuah there are things I would disagree with him here and there. Therefore I will discuss few points: 1- As for the first paragraph in the article about al-Baath and the fall of its slogans about Arab unity, I say that I never was impressed with anything al-Baath had produced. Also, I was never a fan of Arabic nationalism, and nationalism in general.  I like Syria with its multi ethnic composition, and always saw how Arab nationalism is bad for these ethnic groups like the Kurds in Syria and the Amazigh in North Africa, for example who were stripped from their rights to know who they are and teach their language for the sake of Arabism.  al-Baath put its bet on the wrong horse and did not know that the Arabs are tribal, of course sectarian, and racist when it comes to talk about themselves vs other races.  al-Baath never made that distinction between the Arabic culture and the Arabic race, and instead brainwashed the masses, I lived through this myself, telling them that the Arabs wish to be united, and of course you know that is a lie.  Do you think that the rich illiterate rulers of the Gulf who have money want to unite with Syria?  Even the other Baathis in Iraq did not wanted to be united with Syria because they had oil money and Syria did not.Arab Unity was a drug the Baath was selling over the counter without the approval of the right authorities (logic in this case).2- Bassam Junied was a little emotional when he said that Syria is a very rich country and could be one of the best places if its sons and daughters built it correctly.  Here I agree with him about the need for the Syrian people to build their country, but, I think Syria today is a country that is getting poorer by the day with a huge demographic problem.  Limited resources and population growth unplanned and not calculated for.  Syria will also get poorer with this civil war taking place now.  They are not going to get out of it in a long time and wish if an economist would try to estimate the real loss.3- I totally agree with Bassam Juneid when he said that we are in desperate need for historical decisions and actions ASAP.  We need something today before tomorrow that could change things. I like to be optimistic sometimes but the reality is telling me otherwise. This decision/decisions has to be the RIGHT ones that will keep this country together otherwise Syria is going to hell.Point Four: His last sentence is an example of his emotional thinking and I do not blame him because he is living in Syria and can see the destruction and chaos around him. He said that he wants the Arab League and the UN and everyone else to leave Syria alone.  Here, the first thing I do not agree with him in this sentence is that I believe in the role of the UN, no matter how much of a joke it could be here and there.  The second thing I do not agree with him in this sentence is that I think the USA could really play a positive role in Syria and the whole region for a long time, because it is the real superpower of this world with a good democratic record and a law that Syria should copy and learn from especially there are tons of Syrian who could show their co-patriots the right way.  3 4

    • Somaye says:

      11:05pm | 09/03/12

      Yup, that sholud defo do the trick!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter