The man who never voted Liberal in his life has now done the dirty on the man who never tried to join Labor in his life.

Before considering the impact which Brendan Nelson’s sudden and petulant departure from politics will have on Malcolm Turnbull’s flimsy leadership, it’s worth noting its cost to you, the taxpayers.

By refusing to serve out the (very short) remainder of this parliamentary term, Brendan Nelson has forced the public to underwrite the significant expense of a completely unnecessary by-election.

 

OK – so it’s not going to send the country broke. The estimated cost is somewhere in the range of $500,000. But it’s a totally unnecessary bit of expenditure, brought about by one thing only – Nelson’s refusal to honour his contract with the people of Bradfield by serving for three years.

Nelson can argue that because he is off to take up some job in the defence industry that the position could not have remained open until next year’s federal election. He can also argue (insincerely) that his departure from politics gives Malcolm Turnbull some clear air, as opposed to the reality that he’s created a shocking political nightmare for the man who seized his job last year.

The people of Bradfield are hardly battlers and are unlikely to suffer anything other than minor inconvenience at having to go to the polls for a frivolous by-election, and then return again next year for the big one.

But given the size of the pension and super entitlements which can be accesseds by a veteran MP such as Nelson - who served as a minister and opposition leader – it seems a bit rich that none of the costs of this by-election of his own making will be borne by him.

As for Malcolm Turnbull, if it were legal, he’d probably be prepared to pay good money to make this hideous state of affairs go away. The dangers to Malcolm Turnbull from the Bradfield by-election are two-fold.

The first threat is that, even though the seat is held by the Liberals with a 13.5 per cent margin, and has never gone to preferences, any swing away from the Libs will be interpreted as a slight on his leadership. Labor is lying doggo by refusing to field a candidate meaning that a vociferous local Greens campaign can capitalise on any protest vote over the Coalition’s vacillation on climate policy, while also simply capitalising on the fair go factor as voters try to even up what in Labor’s absence is a one-sided contest.

The second threat to Turnbull is an all-in brawl over pre-selection for this blue chip Liberal seat, set against a backdrop of already toxic factionalism in NSW, where the Right Faction has split into Judean People’s Front/People’s Front of Judea groupings, and effete Young Liberals are slapping each other’s faces at karaoke bars in juvenile intra-factional squabbles.

The best hope for the party is that a potentially unifying figure (such as John Howard’s former chief of staff Arthur Sinodinos) can emerge as a consensus candidate and sweep the field. In his absence it may well be a moshpit, and one that takes place in Turnbull’s backyard.

Whatever happens, the events of yesterday confirm that when you’re luck is running against you in politics, the smallest glimmers of hope are generally blown away by a whopping great storm cloud.

As was the case earlier in the year, when the smile on Malcolm Turnbull’s face over Peter Costello’s retirement was wiped away by a fellow called Godwin Grech, the Opposition Leader would have been feeling uncharacteristically chipper yesterday when Newspoll found that he still has a pulse after all. It was hardly a scorching comeback – his satisfaction rating rose four points to 30, his dissatisfaction fell one point to 56 – but when you’re going as badly as he is you take what you can.

But the warm afterglow lasted about three seconds courtesy of Nelson. And it’s hard not to conclude that Nelson – whatever he says about the urgent timing of his private sector job opportunity – knew that it would also come with the happy bonus of letting him skewer the man who shafted him.

So where does it leave Turnbull?

In short, it’s underscored the widely-held public belief that the Libs are indeed an unelectable rabble.

The problem with stories like this for politicians isn’t that the public devours them. On the contrary. They absorb just enough of them to draw a steadfast conclusion which is hard to reverse – such as “gee, what a shambles that lot are” – then shake their heads and move on to reading something more interesting.

After the low-rent vaudeville from the nuttier elements of the Coalition over the ETS in the final fortnight of Parliament, the distractions of Tony Abbott’s book, the Andrew Robb speculation, the well-sourced story over Malcolm Turnbull’s expansive flirtations with the ALP, the conservatives do not currently look like an alternative government.

They look like some kind of broadly-based conservative think tank, where on any given day one of their number might advocate a policy, go forth with an idea, not because the party believes in it, just because it seemed like something interesting to say at the time.

There’s no authority, there’s no discipline, there’s no sense of camaraderie or unity. There’s no direction. And as Brendan Nelson showed yesterday there’s no respect either, not for Malcolm Turnbull, nor for the mug voters who will foot the bill so that Dr Nelson can sashay off into the political sunset with a big bucket of super, and leave the public with the bill for this indefensible by-election.


Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

57 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • alan cotterell says:

      07:44am | 26/08/09

      At least Brendan wasn’t poisonous like most of the other Lib pollies!

    • watty says:

      08:47am | 26/08/09

      Nice to see Penberthy is still on his “Global Warming” kick as ordered by the “boss” the Younger Murdoch.

      Obviously” Penbo” ses nothing “nutty” about imposing a new tax so Rudd and his super ego can be seen to be “leading the world” whilst “developing"countries construct 20 new coal fired power stations annually.?

      As for Nelson deciding to hang up the boots before serving out his time I suggest he is not alone.

      Nelson has done no more than the Labor rats deserting a sinking (or sunk) ship.

      Do the names John Kerin,Ros Kelly,Gareth Evans,Steve Martin ,Neill Blewett ring a bell?

      They all pulled the pin and cost the taxpayers for a bi-election

      Not so long ago Labor with Latham at the wheel were an “unelectable rabble”. With a change of Leader and support from major dailies like the Daily Telegraph Labor creamed the Coalition.

      Perhaps the Coalition could learn from this?

    • Old Clive says:

      08:58am | 26/08/09

      One day, maybe one day all the factions of the Alp will get the same publicity that the Libs are getting, giving credit where credit is due, Krudd has kept the lid on a boiling pot by controling the mouths of his heap of rabble. Rudd won his leadership by a smear campaign and any smear campaign relies on the press to advertise it. Well done the press you have managed to bring the Political Administration of this country down to the level of a third world country with Krudd as our Dictator.

    • Tekko R says:

      09:04am | 26/08/09

      Going out with a bang, having this by-election, rather than out with a whimper at next federal election, makes sense to me. And if I was a voter in Bradfield, I’d revel in the knowledge the whole of Australia was watching to see which way i vote.

    • charlie says:

      09:10am | 26/08/09

      Haha, after the way Turnbull and his backers undermined Nelson from the first day he took over the leadership, why would Nelson give a damn what his resignation does to Turnbull.
      Also whilst by-elections are expensive, would people rather have politicians serving in parliament that don’t want to be there? How would that benefit the nation’s governance? I’ve got a better solution to funding by-elections, how about excepting a legitimate medical reason for the MP’s departure, the people of their electorate pay for the by-election, after all they’re the morons that chose an uncommitted MP in the first place.

    • Roy says:

      09:13am | 26/08/09

      At least Brendan was basically HONEST unlike the other Libs

    • Jonangel says:

      09:14am | 26/08/09

      At least Brendan is doing the right thing, unlike borne to rule Peter.
      An election now will clear the decks, give all parties an insight as to how the electorate is feeling. More importantly, it is worth remembering we get the
      government we deserve.

    • peter from brisbane says:

      09:15am | 26/08/09

      Your comments as truthful and correct as they are, are mistakenly aimed at the possibility that politicians actually give a rats about anything or anybody other than themselves, and the money that they can extract from the gullible taxpayers of our country.
      The same proposition is put forward each and every time that a by-election is called for, the same reasons are proffered and the same reult is arrived at. It doesn’t matter if it is State or Federal, Liberal or Labor it’ always the same, and there is nothing that any media reporting can do about it.

    • Peter says:

      09:58am | 26/08/09

      Better to have a local MP in there who is interested and engaged, rather than one who is merely serving time until he can go at the next election. 

      In my book, Brendan has been honest and done the right thing, both for his party and his constituents.

    • Lester P says:

      10:59am | 26/08/09

      “After the low-rent vaudeville from the nuttier elements of the Coalition over the ETS in the final fortnight of Parliament, the distractions of Tony Abbott’s book, the Andrew Robb speculation, the well-sourced story over Malcolm Turnbull’s expansive flirtations with the ALP, the conservatives do not currently look like an alternative government.”
      The Coalition did nut out their differences (that’s democracy) we just never saw the media run after Rudd and crew when they nutted out their differences. Many other ministers and parliamentarians have flirted with other parties as well, what’s the problem with that?? media beat up again and Labor trying to dig up more dirt on Turnbull, instead of focusing on more important issues of the country. Distractions of Tony Abbotts book?? distraction?? says who? the media again. Andrew Robb specualation? was rubbish, another media beat up and leaked from Rudd and crew to give more bad publicity for Turnbull. The conservatives don’t look like an alternative government, thanks to media and Rudds smear campaign. Rudd and crew have an unhealthy interest in smearing Turnbull instead of more important issues like running the country. There needs to be more focus on the Government of the day. The media play a very dangerous game of letting this Government get away without any scrutiny what so ever.

    • Anthony says:

      11:01am | 26/08/09

      They are not volunteers. They are doing a job. Most people in the country would not remain in their position if a better job came up, or if they thought they were damaging their employer by not doing a good job. Who would want them there? Seems a bit bit rich talking about waste in the public sector in this current environment,. A healthier opposition will prevent waiste in the government

    • Lucy says:

      11:01am | 26/08/09

      The only ‘petulance’ being displayed here is from David Penberthy. Brendan Nelson has served his electorate well for the past 13 years and he has had enough.

      The best way to serve his constituents is to vacate the seat and allow someone new - with all the enthusiasm Nelson had in 1996 - to take over.

      Seriously, if Nelson had hung around, sought outside work, and not given his full commitment, I am sure Mr Penberthy would be urging him to ‘get out of the way’.

      How about a simple ‘thank you’ for his service, and wishing him well for the future.

    • Chris says:

      11:39am | 26/08/09

      Brendan better not be planning on getting a job with Boeing. (6.6 billion dollar Superhornet anyone????).

    • Justin Turner says:

      11:49am | 26/08/09

      Brendan Nelson has already cost the country millions of dollars in poor defence hardware contracts (often against expert advice) in his time as defence minister, so causing a by-election is small fry.

    • Vicki PS says:

      11:50am | 26/08/09

      Anthony, it’s incorrect to think of parliamentarians as “doing a job”.  Representing an electorate is a voluntary service for the public good, or at least that’s the idea.  The munificent salaries paid to members are intended to compensate them for what they might otherwise be earning doing a “real” job.  If you want to talk about waste in the public sector, the costs associated with a change of minister or portfolio are considerable, albeit usually well-hidden.

    • Annie says:

      12:02pm | 26/08/09

      Good on you, Brendan.  Why shouldn’t you get a job which gives you a future.  The Liberal Party have made sure you don’t have one in parliament.

    • Louise says:

      12:13pm | 26/08/09

      Nearly every political blog (including the ABC) has a significant percentage of comments complaining about the media focus on ALP spin and the constant derision of the coalition and Malcolm Turnbull. What do we have to do to get some quality journalism that will help to hold this deceitful and incompetent Rudd government to account? There is simply no way that Rudd’s true approval rating is 66%. Staunch Labor voting friends of ours can’t stand the man.

    • pc says:

      12:30pm | 26/08/09

      Louise, the fact that alleged “staunch labor voting friends of ours” cant stand the Ruddbot doesnt demonstrate his incompetence, merely your inability to actually produce an argument or issue that can explain his persistently high approval ratings and its relationship to a lack of quality in Australian journalism. While I think Australian journalism is pretty poor if you re confined to the NEWSCORP world its doing a better job of holding the Ruddbot to account than the opposition or you for that matter.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      12:33pm | 26/08/09

      The only reason a politician would remove his snout from a trough is that he has spied a bigger trough somewhere else.

    • Mark says:

      12:36pm | 26/08/09

      I could only read the first couple of paragraphs of this artical - gee, what a shambles that lot are, I think I will go & find something intresting to read now.

    • bella says:

      03:00pm | 26/08/09

      I live in bradfield. I’ve never voted in a bielection before so its a bit exciting, it would be more exciting if the result wasnt basically predetermined.

    • Louise says:

      03:24pm | 26/08/09

      pc, it’s very simple to explain the reported ratings of Rudd. They are a complete fabrication produced by ex-ALP staffers who now call themselves pollsters, fed to a complicint Hakwer-Britton controlled media, many of whom are probably soon to be ALP candidates. Today for example, there is a significant issue with proposed changes to the Youth Allowance, Peter Garret has given environmental approval to the Gorgon project despite some significant environmental concerns remaining, Nathan Rees is MIA as most of NSW is about to collapse, Stern Hu is still imprisoned in China without explanation etc, etc . And what is dominating the media cycle. A by-election is an oppostion safe seat. Who cares?

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:01pm | 26/08/09

      I seriously doubt that Brendan Nelson and Peter Costello would be retiring from politics if the Liberals had won the last election. It’s less fun being in Opposition and that’s when the true test of character comes out. I still think John Howard was too ideological but at least he was never a quitter.

    • Old Clive says:

      04:02pm | 26/08/09

      I thought that a by-election is a by-election I think there are too many bi’s around at the moment maybe we can have a bi-election in Rudds seat when he goes back to nerdland from whence he came, there are a lot of nerds in bi-land.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      04:30pm | 26/08/09

      Hmmmm. The bias in this piece was evident, but as I am not a scholar of Australian politics, I thought that perhaps it was nevertheless on the mark. To figure out whether this was bias or truth (though it could be both), I Googled this Penberthy guy…....

      Clearly, it is mostly a product of bias.

    • pc says:

      04:33pm | 26/08/09

      Louise, this is a website owned and run by Murdochs newscorp - He and his empire - a pretty hefty chunk of the media - are enemies of anything remotely left wing, particularly if it may actually help people. This is not because he is an ideologue but because he makes money selling news to rigthards such as yourself who dont think its news if it isnt a repetition of their opinion.
      Clive, the only people I’ve met worried about too many bi’s, are nerds. You’re obviously one of those special kinds of nerds the conservatives clone. The kind of nerd that isnt actually that smart.

    • Louise says:

      05:39pm | 26/08/09

      pc, I’m not making any left v’s right ideological statements. It would be difficult to determine who is left of whom when it comes to Rudd and Turnbull. I am making the observation that there is a complete lack of scrutiny applied to our current government’s actions by almost all of our current media.

    • pc says:

      05:55pm | 26/08/09

      You were making left vs right ideological statements Louise and if I could be bothered to look up at your previous comments I could quote them. Ok I did it but I didnt enjoy it.  “They (reported ratings of the ruddbot) are a complete fabrication produced by ex-ALP staffers who now call themselves pollsters, fed to a complicint Hakwer-Britton controlled media, many of whom are probably soon to be ALP candidates.” Lousie make as many political statements as you like but make statements - for example can you give me a specific example of the lack of scrutiny being applied to the present government? At the moment you sound like a liberal party press release and not a real person. Do you think I could be on to something?

    • Mr Pastry says:

      06:40pm | 26/08/09

      Louise - there is always lack of scrutiny by the press of current government.  There are no hard questions ever,  just approved scripted pieces pretending and redistributed press releases.  The press appear to court a too cosy relationship with government as it is easy.  Do you think the government would agree to be interviewed by a smart journalist with balls enough to veer away from the script? 
      Lazy journalism rules.

    • Louise says:

      06:41pm | 26/08/09

      Sure pc, I can give you lots of examples of the failings of the Rudd government that have received scant if any media coverage. $36 million spent on Fuel Watch ($21mil), Grocery Watch ($13mil), and 2020 Summit (over $2mil) that has amounted to nothing. The unlimited Bank Guarantee that distorted the fixed interest market and continues to deny approx 200,000 pensioners access to money in their Allocated Pensions.  The Education Revolution debacle that will give my sons’ school $2.2 mil to rebuild some old, but perfectly functional classrooms but not allow them to buy the Interactive Whiteboards and Computers that they actually want which would cost about 1/10th of the new classrooms they don’t need. Meanwhile some Public schools have playgrounds full of demountable classrooms. Other schools are now being charged 3 times the original quote for buildings that were already planned. Then there are the grand pre-election promises that have disappeared into the abyss: we will stop the Japanese whaling, we will deliver a faster National Broadband Network, if hospitals have not improved by June 2009 we will take them over,  the Government will pay small business invoices on time, we will deliver one stop childcare clinics. Or the promises that are currently in the process of being broken, we will not change any part of the Private Health insurance rebate, we will not increase taxes as a percentage of GDP. Hmm, because Alcopops tax is a health measure and the Henry tax review is not looking to increase total tax revenue!? Then there’s the change to Refugee Immigration visas and processing that is apparently not responsible for the increase in attempted boat crossings, or the on-going removal of Aboriginal children despite what Rudd said the apology. (Although I’m not debating the rights and wrongs of such removals, just that HE promised it would never happen again. That’s just a few off the top of my head. That’s the point pc. How are you going to be aware of these issues if they’re not in the media. Instead, I’m sure we can all cite Malcolm Turnbull’s approval/disapproval rating for every week of the last 9 months, name a dozen liberals who allegedly have leadership ambitions and quote several conversations that any number of the current opposition may or may not have had with everybody from ALP powerbrokers to government staffers.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      07:32pm | 26/08/09

      PC: judging by your resort to personal insults, i.e. “The kind of nerd who isn’t that smart.”, I’m guessing you vote Labour?

      Do you think I could be on to something?

    • ShaneO says:

      08:30pm | 26/08/09

      Wow Louise!

      Can you please get a job in journalism?! That is the most succint summary of what is wrong with both this government and the media that I have ever read!

      Well written!

    • pc says:

      08:53pm | 26/08/09

      Louise, if it hasnt been covered in the media how do you know about it? And size might matter in the bedroom but not here.  The more you write the more incoherent and desperate you sound. You seem to be disappointed basically that the Ruddbott hasnt granted you three wishes and installed taps that pour forth champagne rather than water.
      Steve: I’m astounded by your perspecacity Steve - are you some kind of detective? If not you should be. If it wasnt for Kato I would happily recommend you to inspector closseau. Better yet Sir Digby Chicken Caeser.

    • pc says:

      09:55pm | 26/08/09

      IF YOU WANT TO see the beginning of the liberals attempt to “Astroturf” labor, (henceforth I shall call it “Gabba Grassing”, then read Louise, Steve and Shane-O. Plastic people for a plastic party.

    • Louise says:

      12:23am | 27/08/09

      ShaneO, thanks for the compliment. I find the aggressive bloggers like pc a bit affronting, so clearly I’m not thick skinned enough for a career in journalism (or politics).
      pc, How do I know all these facts when faced with such a media deficit? Well firstly, as my husband will ruefully attest, I have a good memory. In the 2007 election I felt that Howard had lost touch, it seemed WorkChoices went too far and Australia would end up with a working poor.  I listened to the promises made by Rudd. In addition to what I have quoted so far, he promised to be economically responsible whilst delivering better social outcomes for working families (remember that first “on-message” buzz phrase) and justice for Indigenous Australians. Secondly it is my personal circumstances. My children are in primary school and our P&F can’t believe the stupidity of the Education Revolution spending. Add to that, the fact that some of the pensioners affected are my clients and I have spent hours and hours lodging hardship applications to circumvent the Government’s incompetence. You asked for specific examples and the length of my reply is a reflection of the fact there are so many examples. Your bedroom reference is juvenile, but fairly typical of your posts.

    • ShaneO says:

      01:08am | 27/08/09

      Pc you clearly have anger management problems. Please don’t drive for awhile mate you will no doubt put a baseball bat through some poor defenceless old ladies windscreen.

      If you can’t make comment without resorting to insults then please go back to Ninemsn or other appropriate outlet.

    • Rod says:

      07:28am | 27/08/09

      And the other news is: Labor are the ones in power; News Limited dare not scrutinise the Laborites; Massive new tax being introduced under the guise of Global Warming; Industrial relations dragged back to the 1960s by Laborites; Kevin checks on Pope to get Sainthood.

    • Worker says:

      08:48am | 27/08/09

      Unlike the writer of this article, Nelson has made his contribution to the public and there is no obligation for him to remain in his seat. The public were dumb enough to vote ALP both federally and in NSW in 2007 despite previous abysmal performances, let them have it.

    • Old Clive says:

      01:00pm | 27/08/09

      If I am a nerd, it doesn’t say much for the 48% of people who elected all my fellow nerds, and the subnerds who write pithy comments trying to justify themselves for making what is an obvious lack of understanding of the history of politics in this country, If you ignore history you are doomed to repeat it, but unfortunately a lot of other people are going to suffer because of you lack of understanding.

    • Douglas says:

      01:45pm | 27/08/09

      Louise,

      Mr Rudd lifted the yoke of SerfChoices off the back of your grandkids, saving them from the fate of working lives of rip-off and exploitation from miserable Liberal-supporting “employers”. You should be kissing his feet - that is, of course unless you wanted that bleak future for your or other people’s offspring?

    • Lincoln says:

      02:44pm | 27/08/09

      Well said Louise! Also don’t forget the aboriginal housing debacle, not one house has yet been built.

    • Bill says:

      11:33am | 28/08/09

      Isnt interesting how after almost 2 years we still have the Liberal pollies and their supporters are still sulking and coping with opposition.

      Rudds high approval rating is very simple, the people see what is the alternative and they vote accordingly, very simple.

      So Louise get used to it, given the rabble led my Turn BULL, you will be crying in your weeties for years.

    • Jane Renwick says:

      03:23pm | 28/08/09

      Bill
      You sound like you just can’t stand any scrutiny of your beloved leader. Rudds approval rating won’t stay there for long, although considering most of the pollsters are ex Labor staffers they may remain high for awhile. I deal with many people from all walks of life in my occupation and I certainly don’t find Rudd as popilar as those polls reflect.

    • Bill says:

      04:30pm | 28/08/09

      Jane, you need to get out more and meet some real people, it might broaden your perspective on what is real and stop dreaming that it is all a conspiracy.

      Ex Labour staffers, my my you can do better than that, next we will have the old chestnut the reds are under the bed.

      Kid yourself how much as you like but Rudd is popular because the alternative, is so so much worse in the eyes of most clear thinking, hard working Australians.

      The only bright spark the libs have is Costello and he knows he doesnt want to spend the next 10 years in opposition, so he is getting out like Nelson. Rats deserting a sinking ship.

      Jump before you drown.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      06:37pm | 28/08/09

      Hey Bill, you may be right in saying that Lib supporters need to get over the fact that Labour are now in power, but then I’d also like to see a single speech from Rudd, Gillard, et al that doesn’t start and end with bagging the previous gov’t for every ill that ails Australia. If our own PM can’t forget the past, why should we?

      Mind you, while Rudd and his minions love to blame the Libs for every problem (as though the Libs were still in power) they somehow accept that Labour are in control when something good happens. Can you explain how this works?

    • Ian Higgins says:

      09:42pm | 28/08/09

      Yes Bill , I see a few wheels are starting to come loose on the Rudd machine. Not suprising, considering they have spent the best part of their term in Government concentrating on attacking Turnbull and the opposition. Santa Clause Rudds roosters are about to come home to roost. Rudd needs to get over chasing Turnbull down, blaming the previous Government,  worrying about his popularity and get on with his job.

    • Bill says:

      01:10am | 29/08/09

      Ian and Steve, you would think the country is in a mess, it is gloom, the sky is about to fall down, they way you are carry on, when are you guys going to accept the people voted in this govt, they like this govt. Well the vast majority.

      The win by labour was so emphatic that even poor little Johnny got kicked to kingdom come by a TV reporter, thats how much his own electorate thought of him in the end.

      I am 60 years of age and for the first time in a long time I am proud to be an Australian, because we have a govt in place that is there for the people, irrespective of colour or creed.

      We have finally an inclusive govt not an exclusive govt for business and the rich.

    • Jacinta Grove says:

      08:06am | 29/08/09

      Bill - Your friend Mr Rudd hasn’t even been PM for 2 years yet. The mess he is making of this country with his ETS, CPRS, Education Revolution, the mess of the Aborigianl housing in the N.T. etc.. is yet to unfold.  He’s more interested in his own self promotion. Wanting to push through his ETS fast and without serious consoltation so he can run off to Copenhagen to grandstand and be noticed at the depriment of our country’s economy. His bottom line is to impress the UN so he can get a job with them after he’s finished stuffing up our country. You seem to be stuck on the previous Government and Howard. If it weren’t for Howard and his Government and the surplus they left for your Mr Rudd to inherit, we wouldn’t have survived the GFC as well as we have. He’s yet to make any serious decisions on anything in case it effect his popularity, so we will wait and see what unfolds with him, he may seem sweet to you now but I’m quite sure you won’t think so further down the track..

    • Louise says:

      09:30am | 29/08/09

      Jane, I’ve had the same experience with people who voted for Rudd and now feel they were conned. Bill, Labor’s 83 seats in the House of Reps gives them a 55.33% majority, and only 41 of those seats were won on first preferences. That’s not a very “emphatic” victory. The Benelong victory was a very clever and cunning political play, especially engaging the Chinese consulate in a fear and smear campaign against Howard with the new Chinese residents of Benelong. I am however genuinely interested to know what you think the Rudd Government has done in (almost) 2 years to earn your enthusiastic support. Could you give some examples of real achievements or improvements, without reference to any the opposition (past or present)?

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      10:50am | 29/08/09

      No Bill, the country isn’t in a ‘mess’ and I didn’t say so. Another Labour trick - putting words in other people’s mouths…....

      In fact, our country is in quite good shape - thanks largely to Peter Costello and the Libs!

    • Bill says:

      01:42pm | 29/08/09

      Tricks, conspiracy theories on why this and why that, you libs are all the same, all you want to see is what you want to see. It is the born to rule mentality, if the libs get kicked out it has to be tricks, it has to be conspiracy, it just cant be democracy can it.

      Howard was the most dishonst PM this country has ever had, he was the one who invented the line of CORE promises, he presided over the lies of children overboard, weapons of mass destruction, he even lied to Peter Costello.

      In the end he was only the 2nd PM in history to get kicked out of his own seat, that says a lot about his legacy. The ultimate political shame.

      Look you can live in the past, the world is changing day by day, thank goodness we have Government who thinks for the future and not the past.

      Keep sulking in true liberal fashion.

    • Lana says:

      03:26pm | 29/08/09

      Bill, you should call the nurse I think you’ve missed your medication!

    • Louise says:

      07:51pm | 29/08/09

      Bill, I really am interested in what it is that the Rudd Government has done to deserve your continued passionate support. I’m not being a smarty. I like to be able to see both sides of an argument, but I just can’t see any basis for your view on Rudd. (Howard, I get why you think what you do, even though I don’t agree). Can you give some examples of Rudd’s achievements that impress you so much (without reference to anyone in the opposition)?

    • Bill says:

      09:40pm | 29/08/09

      I get my medication everyday, by waking up to a Labor Government, so I will be in good health for many years to come.

      Thats an absolute guarantee with TurnBULL, Hockey and Abbott leading the rabble on the other side. Talk about the three blind monkeys.

      No wonder you libs are so down in the dumps and clutching at straws.

    • Bill says:

      12:48am | 30/08/09

      Louise,

      The Rudd govt has not been in power for yet 2 years, yet you seem to want to compare what it has achieved to a previous govt that had 11 years in power.

      But okay I will play your game, first of all they made the aplogy to our fellow Australians that Howard was gutless to make.

      Second they acknowledged that climate change was real and not take the ostrich head in the sand approach of Howard’s govt.

      Third they removed WORKCHOICES.

      Fourth they acted with authority, calmness and direction re the financial crisis and have put Australia into the best position of any Western Country in the world.

      Now there are other points I could mention, but you need to compare what Rudd has achieved in 22 months in office as compared to what Howard achieved in his first 22 months.

      There is no comparison, Rudd is forging a direction that is imperative to this country moving forward , while the opposition wants to live in the past.

      Let me throw to you, what one positive thought or idea has Turnbull or his rabble come up with in the last 22 months.

      We have one side with a positive agenda, the other disorganised, negative with no ideas.

      Thats the point.

    • Douglas says:

      07:38am | 30/08/09

      Listen to all these whingers, mourning for WORKCHOICES. Get over it. Mr Rudd and Ms Gillard have take WORKCHOICES out the back and executed it. Your kids / grandkids will not face the fate of being made virtual slaves to be exploited by miserable Liberal-supporting employers.

      Depressing isn’t it, Liberals? That Labor mob, they’re such evil buggers eh.

    • Haven Maven says:

      05:22pm | 31/08/09

      I’m bi-election curious.

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Time to put this summer of cricket out of its misery, writes Anthony Sharwood. Hear hear! http://bit.ly/9OLM07

David Penberthy

@geoffb oh, diddums.

David Penberthy

@Adam_Sims hell yeah. the recent past of australian tennis is in doubt!

David Penberthy

Libs reckon the future of australian tennis is in doubt due to rudd's ETS. They're smoking the same stuff as screaming lord monckton #qt

Gentle jabs to the ribs

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

Usually, when it comes to watching your favourite sport or movie on television, ads are the last thing… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter