It’s the battle of the baby bonus today as Tony Abbott’s wildly ambitious plan to pay parents bucket loads of money gets put through the wringer. Join us here from 2pm for live coverage of Question Time.

Meanwhile the BBC’s Australia correspondent has written a piece about Kevin Rudd BC and AC - Before Copenhagen and After Copenhagen. Interesting outsider perspective.

7 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      02:26pm | 09/03/10

      I just saw an online poll, asking whether I thought the taxpayer or business should foot the bill for paid maternity leave. I didn’t vote, because a third option should have been included - I vote that parents should pay for their own maternity leave!

    • Stefano says:

      02:51pm | 09/03/10

      Couldn’t agree more>

    • stephen says:

      02:47pm | 09/03/10

      Mr Abbott reckons his daughters thought up the latest policy of paying rich people to breed ; probably on the assumption that the rich are deemed successful, and successful people have good genes, and good genes should be maintained by taking money off everyone else.
      Market forces, anyone ? I don’t think so, and if the Abbott family wish to promote Capitalism, they should go back to theory, in which case they have two to choose from : Liberal, and nsdap.

    • AJ says:

      02:58pm | 09/03/10

      OK, let me get this straight.  Under Labor’s plan, everyone gets the minimum wage, but it doesn’t cost very much (comparatively).  Under the Libs plan, minimum wage earners earn no more than they would under the Labor plan, but the wealthy earn their income up to a cap of around $150k, and it costs a bucketload?

      Without wanting to state the obvious about the equity, who the hell is writing these policies which are antithetical to Liberal Party core values?  Is securing Family First preferences that darn important?

    • Keith Hammersmith says:

      03:16pm | 09/03/10

      My wife and I own our own business, we are having a baby next month, we have to put more people on to cover the diminished workload myself and or my wife would be able to accomplish,  do we get anything?  Nope.  Just thanks for stimulating the economy by running a business and employing. There is going to be no way to make this a fair policy accross the board, so I am of the opinion it should not be implemented.

    • AJ says:

      03:53pm | 09/03/10

      Keith,

      To make a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, and to highlight the inadequacies of the scheme, you could very well put your wife on the payroll for $150,000 a year for the next month, and get a free $75k from the Government (if the Coalition’s scheme was implemented)

    • preciouspress says:

      03:40pm | 09/03/10

      Clear today that it’s the Opposition Tactics Committee needs ‘pink batts’. Without them their incompetence and lack of consequential thought was again there for all to see. As described by the PM, Abbott’s ‘thought bubble’ on maternity leave, denied his previous conviction on this issue, wasn’t discussed with or costed by his finance ministers, and sprung upon big business who would be expected to pay for the largesse. Despite this the opposition ask questions based upon this furphy - a gift to the Government.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@diversionary#wading

Paul Colgan

Tip for young journos. Have a short CV. A page, two max.

Malcolm Farr

@cjjosh Only communications satellites please (Limited field).

Malcolm Farr

@DarrenFerrari @andrewcatsaras And so he should be. He might be the chap humming in the background to the end of the recording.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter