Punch TV: Episode #1

Clem says:

04:15pm | 14/08/09

I thought youse all did very well. Well done!

The only thing I thought that could’ve been improved was that Pembo overburdoned himself by trying to be both commentator and anchorman. This meant his questions were very long statements - you could sense the vision switcher getting antsy about when to switch to the next talking head. The anchorman’s job should be to try and introduce new ideas into the conversation with as few words as possible, and let the rest of the panel be the wordy ones. And cut them off if they go on for too long!

Thomas says:

07:50pm | 14/08/09

Firstly can I begin by saying I enjoyed watching this on youtube - I didn’t realise it was on Sky Channel and certainly would’ve tuned in if I did. I am a long time reader (right from the start), and commented on the online Question Time before, but this commenting is a first!

Secondly, about the show!

I think Clem actually raised a good point about the length of time each member spoke for. However, I don’t think this was the fault of individual panelists or of the host. My opinion is that, due to the fact only two issues were really canvassed, a quick pace was not required. I enjoyed this change of pace (excuse any pun) as guests were not rushed and thus could articulate their argument properly and the debate was able to provide true insight.

Another point to consider is on the structure of the show. The fact that there were two topics, only on sport, seemed almost relentless towards the end. I think it might have been more successful to have two different tolpics, and therefore the range of panelists could’ve been broader, and more varied. For example you would’ve had a Sports Minister discussing a different topic, and an expert in that topic discussing sport - providing rather varied opinions. I think this makes for interesting viewing - plus, represents the fact that not everyone is an expert on every topic.

As well, a quick ‘three minute’ discussion, or giving panelists sixty-seconds to outline their argument for a very topical point might break-up the longer segments and provide another interesting point for the show. It simply depends what type of show you want to create.

To conclude, I must admit it did actually look like a ‘first episode’ - obviously because it was. I really hope that you continue with this, growing and developing TV skills (like asking questions more succinctly, and maybe a little faster) and covering a broader range of topics. From reading articles here daily I know ThePunch has a lot to offer and look forward to seeing this transferred to the TV show!

Well done and congratulations on the launch!