Emmanuel Jal was around seven years old when he was recruited as a soldier for the Sudanese Liberation Army. He’s now become a hit musician. But how did he get from one to the other? He explained his story to The Punch.

Emmanuel Jal in Sydney in 2009. Picture: Renee Nowytarger

Can you describe for us how you were recruited to the Sudanese Liberation Army, and how you felt at the time?

I was 7 years old and I had been sent to a refugee camp in Ethiopia by my father to receive schooling and to leave the war behind. Whilst I was at the camp, under the UN’s nose SPLA commanders were rallying the children and young people together.

They told us ‘your families are not here anymore, your family and mother are the Ak47s’. As a result it was easy to indoctrinate us with their ideologies and take revenge on the Arabs from the North.

I wanted to kill as many as possible at the time, I was angry by what had happened to me, I was young, alone and didn’t know otherwise.

When they wanted to pick us as soldiers I didn’t think about my age, there were no other opportunities and I was determined to fight for what I’d lost.

What made you feel bitter, and as though killing Muslims was the right thing to do?

Since I was born I saw cruelty to my family and community from what we called ‘jalabas’ from the north. The hatred grew inside me as the war ruled my childhood. My first sights were of war, bombs dropping, the ground shaking, people running.

Some of my clearest earliest memories were of people being attacked: I remember my mum’s guard motionless on the ground as she tried to push his intestines back into his dying body, fleeing on a boat which turned upside down and people drowning and worst of all losing my mum as bombs dropped and having to leave for Ethiopia alone at 7 years old.

By the time I arrived, I was vulnerable and bitter. Killing Muslims was a solution to me, a way of releasing my anger and to fight for what had happened to us.

What would you like the world to know about child soldiers?

Child soldiers are not different to any child in the world. Children in war and without education are vulnerable and are easily indoctrinated by people who want to use them.

The situation forces them to do other things, they are not evil or bad, but they have no one and the army is their family. The way out of this is to ensure that children are safe and educated.

Safety will protect them and education will give them confidence and knowledge to seek another way and learn that conflict is never the solution. There are always 2 sides to a story, but you won’t learn about this unless there’s education. 

How did you turn your life around?

Through education. Education allowed me to see things in a different way and also how to forgive. I learnt about other conflicts in the world and about great leaders who promoted peace, like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King.

This gave me a different perspective on how to deal with things and also I learnt most importantly that it wasn’t necessarily the Muslims killing us but the economics behind the issues in South Sudan.

The North had the power and wealth, so through religion they brought people together in order to discriminate the ‘Christians’ in the South and the tribes they saw as inferior.

People always try to divide and conquer, even amongst the South Sudanese there are still issues of tribalism amongst the Dinka and Nuer. We have to learn we are one people and in order to move forward and develop we have to resolve things peacefully in order to prosper.

Education helps this immensely as it gives young people the opportunity to learn and appreciate our differences in the world, be emotionally intelligent and not to discriminate. From this I learnt how to forgive, and through forgiving myself and the people who hurt me I found a way of moving on.

Tell us about the role of hip hop in protest and social justice?

Hip Hop is like the CNN of the ghetto. It’s the voice of the people and highlights social injustices. I turned to hip hop because it was a form of expression which I could identify with.

I liked the way it called out against social injustice without having to be politically correct. It’s a passionate and exciting way to voice your message. I’ve also learnt how to have fun with it, and now my songs are also about things I can celebrate in life too.

Emmanuel Jal appears at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas, Sydney Opera House in: War: Keep Out of Reach of Children, with journalist Kate Adie on Sunday October 2, 2.30pm, Opera Theatre.

55 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Nathan says:

      06:24am | 30/09/11

      I have heard people on here comment that we should not accept any refugees and send them all home (before anyone tries to defend it they where not only talking about boat people) saying rip up the UN this and rip up the UN that….after reading this i wonder what kind of person would still believe it, i can’t believe anybody would in the first place

    • Erick says:

      07:59am | 30/09/11

      “I have heard people on here comment that we should not accept any refugees and send them all home ...”

      That’s one of the problems caused by the pro-boat-people brigade. Their tactics give all refugees a bad name that they don’t actually deserve.

      In effect, people who demand we admit everyone who rocks up on a boat are harming genuine refugees in the long run.

    • RyaN says:

      09:04am | 30/09/11

      @Nathan: And if the boat people had been coming regularly back when he was waiting for refugee status, he would still be sitting in a camp somewhere.
      This mans story is yet another reason why we shouldn’t be accepting these country shoppers over proper refugees.

    • GOLD says:

      09:14am | 30/09/11

      i have never seen anyone on here say we should not accept refugees.

      Do you honestly believe this 7yo boy has the resources to pay a people smuggler to get him to Australia? of course not. But those who do come here and are by law made to be taken in ahead of him.

      We have a quota each year of how many refugees we take in. As long as people still come here by boat to jump the q. Children like Emmanuel will continue to rot in refugee camps

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:16am | 30/09/11

      It likens to a stroy of my friends dad who was recruited by the Khmer Rouge, came to his parents house and kidnapped him and turned him into a soldier and then had the unfortunate experience of having to live in a Thai UN refugee camp where rapes and beatings were a daily occurrence before being settled into Australia.

    • fml says:

      09:17am | 30/09/11

      Erick,

      Who is doing the actual harming? The people arriving on the boats, or every one else condemning them and all other refugees, and the people who call for the withdrawal from the UN refugee convention??

      “That’s one of the problems caused by the pro-boat-people brigade. Their tactics give all refugees a bad name that they don’t actually deserve.”

      So somebody else is responsible for your point of view?

    • Erick says:

      09:57am | 30/09/11

      @fml - You need to improve your reading comprehension.

      I’ve already said who is doing the actual harming: the pro-boat-people campaigners who smear the reputation of genuine refugees by associating the word with asylum shoppers.

      “So somebody else is responsible for your point of view?”

      We are not discussing my point of view. We are discussing the point of view of those who would deny genuine refugees entrance to Australia.

      You wouldn’t need to ask these questions if you read what I actually said in the first place.

    • Bonestar says:

      10:16am | 30/09/11

      He’s seems like a strong and intelligent man imagine the good he could do for his people back in his homeland.

    • fml says:

      10:50am | 30/09/11

      Erick,

      I know what you meant, Its still a bit early and i may have not got my point across sufficiently. What i was trying to say, albeit poorly, when you are talking about the bad name refugees have, its not because of the pro-boat-people brigade, its because you have cast judgement upon them.

      Now for the comprehension lesson, Do you (As in you personally) understand that the “you” can be used as both a singular and plural. (i.e. you are, in common with we are and they are). It is perfectly acceptable, so in that context i was not talking about the singular “you” but infact the plural which means as a member of a general group.

      ” the pro-boat-people campaigners who smear the reputation of genuine refugees by associating the word with asylum shoppers.”

      The above its false, when has a proboat person ever called them asylum shoppers? Asylum seekers yes, its the anti boat people that call them shoppers, so that point is absurd.

    • AdamC says:

      11:12am | 30/09/11

      Sorry, fml, but it is definitely the ‘boat huggers’  who habitually use the term ‘refugee’ to describe both those people who make use of the formal humanitarian resettlement programme and those who front up in leaky tubs. Most of us in the anti-people smuggling camp use terms like ‘boat people’, ‘boat arrivals’ or, in Erick’s less neutral parlance, ‘asylum-shoppers’ to describe the latter. That is, we normally distinguish irregular, boat-arrived refugees and formally resettled refugees. You guys usually don’t and therefore tar everyone with the same brush.

      It’s a bit of a compassion fail when you think about it. Which in turn is a bit of a problem for a movement which is best known for its holier-than-thou moral narcissism.

    • fml says:

      12:09pm | 30/09/11

      AdamC

      I understand, and agree that “boat huggers” use the term refugee, they dont use the term “Asylum shoppers”.

      ” You guys usually don’t and therefore tar everyone with the same brush.” Well thats what they are, refugees, red and green apples still falls under the category types of apples.

      “It’s a bit of a compassion fail when you think about it. Which in turn is a bit of a problem for a movement which is best known for its holier-than-thou moral narcissism.”

      It is only known for that by its detractors, hence i doubt its validity, if the anti-boat crew were categorised by their detractors they would be known   by less flattering terms as well.

      But i seriously doubt the “compassion” of what you now call the Anti people smugglers. If that is the primary issue and that group are primarily concerned with the welfare of these people and stopping people smuggling, then money can be thrown at the problem, we spend on education and making a more direct route via the australian government to get here that doesnt take years, but i suspect this “compassion” is nothing more than a front for hidden concerns. I counter act the holier-than-thou moral narcissism with a thinly veiled cloak of compassion hiding fiscal and societal integration concerns.

    • Erick says:

      12:27pm | 30/09/11

      @fml - I am not a member of the general group that thinks Australia should reject all refugees. If you wish to ask questions of members of that group, it’s pointless to ask me.

      In this thread I’m just pointing out that when the “boat huggers” falsely associate the term “refugee” with violent and greedy boat people, they slander refugees in general and turn people against them.

      Boat huggers are hurting genuine refugees in many ways, but their lack of compassion makes them oblivious.

    • fml says:

      01:16pm | 30/09/11

      @Erick,

      Irony isnt just a pre-pubescent description of a type of metal, it is also a description of your second paragraph :p

    • AdamC says:

      01:20pm | 30/09/11

      Fml, Erick and I do not oppose ordered refugee resettlement, only disorderly, people-smuggled boat arrivals. However, the anti-people smuggling church is a broad one (and much larger than the boat-hugging community) so there are many different views. I don’t dispute that some people who oppose people smuggling do so on the basis that they are concerned that irregular boat arrivals may have trouble fitting into Australian society.

      But that is not really the point of this discussion. What Erick pointed out and that I agreed with was that boat huggers, by insisting that all refugees are plain vanilla ‘refugees’ irrespective of how they arrived in Australia, are stigmatising humanitarian arrivals. Boat huggers should, like everyone else, distinguish between the two. For example, you could use the word ‘asylum seeker’ to describe boat arivals.

    • John Smythe says:

      01:30pm | 30/09/11

      Dunno FML…Erick’s comments seem the more clear. Yours, however seem hell bent on being pedantic, completely bypassing what the original point he is making.

    • Erick says:

      01:51pm | 30/09/11

      @John Smythe - fml is displaying the political squid reaction. When faced with truths he doesn’t like, he squirts out a cloud of semantic ink in an attempt to obscure and confuse the issue.

    • fml says:

      03:08pm | 30/09/11

      John,

      Thats fair enough, first i had issue with Erick, because i do not think its the boat huggers giving refugees a bad name, i think that is a cop out. Even if Erick isnt talking about himself, i think the attributing negative connotations are not placed upon refugees by the boat huggers but rather from their detractors. I essentially see this as these individuals (who Erick is referring to) not taking responsibility for their views on asylum seekers or at the very least not admitting ownership, i see it as these people saying, my views on asylum seekers are not formed by my own intellect, but the negative view of them are forced on me by the actions of the “boat huggers”. This is what i have an issue with, i find it absurd that someone can have an opinion on a subject but distance themselves from ownership of their own opinion.

      @Erick, I am trying to have a pleasant conversation, the comparison to cephalopods is unnecessary. I find your style of debate intriguing, you more often than not employ the same tactics that you deride others of using.

      “I agreed with was that boat huggers, by insisting that all refugees are plain vanilla ‘refugees’ irrespective of how they arrived in Australia, are stigmatising humanitarian arrivals.”. No of course they are all not.

      Why i argue points like the ones Erick makes, when people calls boat people violent and greedy, these statements, which come from ericks finger tips make me laugh, I then almost have an heart attack when i realise he honestly thinks someone can make a statements such as this (I am accepting the fact that Erick says it isnt his opinion, even though i think it is) and claim that it is possible that its the fault of the boat huggers that they has this opinion.

      it may seem pedantic to you, john and erick, but i feel its an important element in the post.

    • fml says:

      03:10pm | 30/09/11

      @AdamC,

      Just want to say, I know we do not agree on much, but i do enjoy conversing with you.

      Good day to you sir smile

    • Erick says:

      03:43pm | 30/09/11

      @fml - Ummm, what? That last comment was just ... incoherent.

    • John Smythe says:

      03:54pm | 30/09/11

      fml…if only you put that much effort into your normal posts you wouldn’t come across the way you usually do. I’m happy to read both sides of an argument, but more often than not, your arguments are usually nothing more than trying to be pedantic on a small point, or try and force meaning other than what the original poster intends just to have an argument you want to have.

      I still think you’ve missed what Erick was saying, and AdamC clarified further. You are actually proving his point further.

    • Joe says:

      11:44pm | 30/09/11

      Erick is a Refugee Advocate


      fml is a People Smuggling Advocate

    • gran5 says:

      07:22am | 30/09/11

      Regardless of the coersion techniques used to create the sodier.

      Shouldnt people who commit crimes against humanity be prosecuted appropriately.

      How many people has this guy brutally mutilated kiled and raped?  10? 50? 200?

    • Fiona says:

      08:45am | 30/09/11

      He was a kid when they got him. Wasn’t old enough to make an independent choice. Notice how he’s not doing it now, now that he’s grown and has a choice? I’m not defending what he probably did, but I guess he’s got to live with the memories of it.

    • Chris says:

      09:17am | 30/09/11

      Picture your own child, scared and alone, and along come some people who are offering to allow your child to be a part of the group.  In a way, feel cared for and included in a “Family”.
      What’s vile and disgusting is not a child that allows themself to become apart of this, but a person who would take advantage of a child’s innocence in that way.
      Innocence and guilt are associated with intention, and children in this position have the intention of being a part of a “family” that provides them with some comfort.  Something every child deserves.
      This young man is inspirational in the way he has individually bettered himself, for his own benefit and the betterment of the world in which he grew up.

    • fml says:

      09:24am | 30/09/11

      Gran5,

      Who were the aggressors, the south or north sudanese? or doesnt it matter?

    • Danielle says:

      10:52am | 30/09/11

      I agree with the with the comments remarked so far, but it’s also important to bear in mind the legal frameworks. The Convention on the Rights of the Child ascribes him particular rights and protections. Furthermore, I believe it’s under the ICC through the Rome Statute made the recruitment of child soldiers a war crime.
      Of course, such legal constructions are underpinned by normative (and arguably, moral) and practical contexts. The realities of contemporary civil conflicts means that protections are not always protected and enforced, which allows boys like Emmanuel to be exploited: either by mental coercion or controlled by drugs.
      In the context of thinking about prosecution for crimes against humanity, it is an enormous effort on the part of international prosecutors to bring major coordinators of human rights atrocities to justice. Tracking every single adult abuser, never mind children who are rarely responsible for their own actions, is a difficult and lengthy process.

    • John says:

      07:50am | 30/09/11

      Hi-hop is for criminals. It’s like giving criminals a voice. Walk into any western prison and ask all what type of music the inmates listen to. I’m sure you will find that 80% listen hi-hop. It’s no surprise the Marxists in Hollywood( MTV) music industry who’s primary aim is weaken and divide western culture and society promote this music. This then pass’s onto the youth which decays culture and the youth themselves. Next thing you know woman are breeding with criminals because they think it’s hip!, boys are running in streets shooting at each and the law, and looting becomes wide spreed “London 2011” “Paris Burns”. This is what you call social decadence which is the primary aim of the red socialists. I also forgot, this culture also breeds socialist handouts. So hi-hop is burden on the tax payer, and the legal system, which costs the tax payer more. Just remember even criminals are used by Marxists as force to criticize western society, they are said to be VICTIMS of western oppression!! amazing isn’t it! Feminism, Homosexuals, Criminals, Atheists all oppressed by Christian Western society!! Then add animals, environment all victims of christian and western oppression! I can’t believe this music in bombarded onto out television screens! The Music should be label as a Cultural Virus, what would cause future social problems.

    • Fiona says:

      08:48am | 30/09/11

      Words fail…..and I don’t even like hip hop.

    • Steve says:

      09:22am | 30/09/11

      With this much hate it’s no wonder there are wars and things are so divisive. You can listen to Gospel music and I’ll listen to Wu Tang, why hate what others listen to? If you don’t like it, don’t listen to it. Pretty simple.

      Oh and all my mates and I listen to hip hop (among many other genres) and we’ve all got degrees and work in respectable jobs. Not everyone who listens to hip hop are criminals (and not all criminals listen to hip hop - somehow I doubt Brejvik did).

      The only virus is your hate, the same hate found in Sudan.

    • fml says:

      09:26am | 30/09/11

      so what you are saying is giving a voice to the under classes of society is a socialist concept, so we should limit their voice, for the sake of democracy.

    • sneakers says:

      10:46am | 30/09/11

      John, that was freakin hilarious. Thanks for the laugh!

      Props to Emmanuel Jal.

    • John says:

      11:46am | 30/09/11

      Brejvik wasn’t anti-rap, he was anti-Muslim. Like the Western Media Western Leaders. Mohammed Cartoonists and the Neo-Consertives. Personally i think he was an agent, fighting for establishment interests. The establishment tried to tie him to the Anti-EU Nationalist movements Europe but failed.  I wouldn’t be surprised if his manifesto was written by some establishment controlled intelligence agency. Many people called it for what it was, another false flag operation by the establishment. I suspect the establishment are now threaten by the growing nationalist sentiment growing europe that they are devising plan’s on how to tackle them. False flag operations are most likely on their list, in order to try and turn the people against their threats. SO basically fictional Al-Qaeda is not the enemy anymore, but Europeans are now the enemy’s because they are resisting establishment control. European are now the new terrorists according to establishment media networks. We are walking into a 1984 super state with ruthless western establishment who will do anything to remain in power.

    • Sam says:

      12:08pm | 30/09/11

      John is always always good for a laugh!

    • Lloyd says:

      04:13pm | 30/09/11

      I completely agree! John. I didn’t think it would be appropriate to say because of his sad background. But I do agree. It is vile music, firstly, encouraging violence, sexism and homophobia, and secondly it is stupid music. Just sounds so ugly.

    • James1 says:

      04:29pm | 30/09/11

      What about Christian and nationalist hip hop?  There is such a thing as both.

    • Wynston Cruso says:

      04:38pm | 30/09/11

      Haha John, good stuff. I’d be pissed at you if your post wasn’t so delusional, ignorant and down right hilarious. Have you ever heard any hip hop? A Tribe Called Quest, De La Soul, Common, Mos Def, Talib Kweli? The least violent music you’ll ever hear.

      I suggest you research things before you form an opinion, classing all ‘hip hop’ into the same category as gangster rap and commercial lolly pop ring tone rap is a mistake often made by the ignorant hip hop haters. You have no idea how stupid you sound.

    • Steve says:

      05:01pm | 30/09/11

      But don’t ya know Wynston, Mos Def, Talib Kweli & Q-Tip are muslims!

      This John character would never appreciate The Roots anyhow…still sad they haven’t toured in like 4 years :(

    • Wynston Cruso says:

      05:42pm | 30/09/11

      hehe good point Steve.

      I still to this day remember The Roots coming to Perth around 4 years ago, had a smile on my face the whole time and didn’t murder a single person smile

    • subotic says:

      10:52am | 03/10/11

      @John, wow, I think I’ve finally found someone who trumps Cathy O’Brien or David Icke in the totally delusional stakes. All you need to do now is confirm your belief in CIA sponsored underground reptilian aliens who secretly control the planet and you get the prize mate. Trance-Formation, MK-Ultra or Project Monarch got nothing on you….

    • OchreBunyip says:

      08:00am | 30/09/11

      Gran5, killed I’ll go with but why the assumption that soldiers rape, or even that this child soldier raped? As for prosecution for crimes against humanity, in war there are a number of excuses for killing people, whether they be in uniform or not.

    • baal says:

      08:36am | 30/09/11

      Can people here for once look at situation and recognise it as being what it is. Complicated. Very very complicated.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:41pm | 30/09/11

      Ah, but that would confuse the myriad of people who think you can solve the world’s problems in 400 posts or less on a blogsite.

    • Venetia says:

      08:57am | 30/09/11

      Wow, great read. It’s unimaginable what some people have to go to. Makes you feel very lucky. Good on him.

      I’ve actually heard stories like this before. In fact this article on SBS’s website is remarkably similar: http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1562111/long-road-to-freedom-for-former-child-soldier

      Just goes to show what people can overcome in the face of adversity - even if they’re recruited to an army as kids!

    • Casey says:

      09:31am | 30/09/11

      Congratulations Emmanuel for turning your life around. An amazing story and I wish you every success with your music.

      Erick, I wish I could say I’ve missed you since I left Australia and don’t read your comments regularly anymore, alas… you are the same old hater you were a year ago. Shame.

    • Erick says:

      09:59am | 30/09/11

      @Casey - What have I said that was “hateful”? It seems you’re the one who is dishing out hate at me, for no reason.

    • Bonestar says:

      10:21am | 30/09/11

      You went overseas and you still think about someone who posts on this site a year later! Wow! You must’ve went to New Zealand no one has a life there

    • Anna C says:

      09:33am | 30/09/11

      Hmmm from child soldier to hip hop artist. He’s gone from murdering people to now murdering music instead. I guess it’s a step in the right direction but I really don’t like hip hop.

    • Gaia says:

      01:13pm | 30/09/11

      Anna C, do you really understand where this boy has come from, the struggles he has had to endure and face? Your blatantly ignorant attitude is simple and shallow.

      “From murdering people to now murdering music instead”. It is not about the music. It is about the message that he is trying to spread THROUGH that music, regardless of its genre. It would be the same thing if he set on a path of politics to alert the world to the problems facing his part of the world. Ultimately it is the message that matters, and the outcomes that emerge out of it reaching people.

      Please try and think beyond your initial interpretations of such issues.

    • Anna C says:

      02:24pm | 30/09/11

      Gaia I was just being flippant and trying to lighten the atmosphere. Don’t take everything I say so seriously. Yes, I get the gist of the article ... the guy overcame adversity against all odds to become the success that he is today. Good for him.

    • Wynston Cruso says:

      04:45pm | 30/09/11

      Why? Have you ever listened to any apart from what is on the radio? By the way, the radio ‘hip hop’ is shite, and shouldn’t at all give you any preconceptions about what hip hop is and actually sounds like. Until you’ve actually tried it, don’t hate. I’d start with The Roots if you’re a hip hop noob.

    • magpie says:

      01:16pm | 30/09/11

      If this man’s remarkable story interests you, please read ‘What Is The What’ by Dave Eggers. It is the most inspirational, life-changing, fascinating, horrific book I’ve ever read, and I’m sure you’ll agree if you give it a chance.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      04:32pm | 30/09/11

      I grew up in the UK during WWII. We did not become “Child Soldiers” but if it had meant we got fed regularly we probably would have!
      We were, however, taught to hate all Germans, all Italians & all the Japanese. Not so much by our parents as by the Government, teachers, clergy & the very tightly controlled Media (there were really only two types of that: Wireless & Newspapers). Our Dad’s were away in the Forces & our Mum’s were far too busy making ends meet & scraping together nutritious meals for us all. Remeber there was no TV, little or no Birth Control so families were quite large!
      We were brought up to believe in God, to say our prayers every night before going to bed, be obedient, go to school &, when Mum had time to take us, go to church on Sundays.
      That Emmanuel Jal was able to reach here &, despite all he had been through put aside his almost second-nature Hatred, speaks volumes not just for him but for Australia as well.
      Isn’t this what Australia is really all about? Isn’t what Emmanuel has done a perfect example of what , indeed almost certainly initially was, a very, very angry young person can do to set aside the violence & hatred & make a decent life for himself & bring pleasure to untold numbers of others?
      Yet there are still bigots, racists, xenophobes who would prevent that wonderful change from taking place by denying people like Emmanuel entry, by whatever means, to Australia.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      11:42pm | 30/09/11

      Hi Punch Team,

      Great story about a young man, I have found it very uplifting & remarkable, to say the least!  It is not so much listening to hip hop, but living in ghetto like environments & civil war that determine the future of people like Emmanuel. 

      There is so much misconception & stigma attached to being an African!!  Being poor, uneducated, & from a very different background is a heavy burden to bear already!!  However, I feel that successful & determined young people like him should be applauded & encouraged!!

      Just like he has mentioned in the article that there are always two sides to everything & the ultimate truth.  His story seems to have a happy ending!! Most importantly he managed to rise above his troubled upbringing, feelings of hatred & poverty. He should be a role model for all young people from his background & the rest of the world as well!!  Best regards to your editors.

    • Joe says:

      09:57am | 01/10/11

      I hardly think someone becoming a hip hop artist is success.  And I hope this is not held out to the Somali children in Australia as an ideal of success.  It would be good to see examples of doctors, lawyers, accountants, business people, teachers, nurses etc, etc than a hip hop star. 

      This no doubt is a very appealing story to young children but it is typical of the African American culture, where its more important for African American teenager boys to have their jeans hanging around their bottom just right than to do well at school and receive a good education.  And the African American teenage girls think its more important to pick up the next up and coming JayZ or the next Snoop Dog than to do well at school and receive a good education.  When the boys don’t make it to being a hip hop star and the girls don’t end up with a recognized hip hop artist then they go through a major identity crisis which unfortunately many of these people don’t make it.  Only a very few people can make it as hip hop artists.

      The Somali community in Australia should make sure that they celebrate the success of people like Emmanuel Jal but at the same time recognise that potential jobs in this industry are small.  You need to be offering your children many other dreams and make sure they focus on getting a good education. If your children are struggling with education go and get help from the education authorities, from politicians, etc, etc because education is the most important thing to the future success of you children in Australia.

    • stephen says:

      01:15pm | 01/10/11

      Hip-hop and rap is not music ; it’s an excuse for the nervous and vacant to appear busy, and at the same time, wear tatoos and drug-manufacturing t-shirts, whilst crapping on about societ’ys inclusiveness.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter