When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming.  You expect you’ll get a whack when you protect an endangered plant which if people saw in their garden, they’d presume was a weed. You know there’ll be some red hot political point scoring if jobs are meant to be put at risk to make way for the interests of some thrice mutated rare frog.

New depths: apparently this old reef isn't worth saving. Photo: Cairns Post

But what I never expected was to have the Queensland Liberal National Party go after me for wanting to look after koalas and the Great Barrier Reef.

Queensland Premier Campbell Newman had turned up to his first COAG meeting with the other Premiers and the Prime Minister saying he’d be willing to help speed up processing times for business by enforcing the national environmental standards when he gives state approvals.  But only a fortnight later he flicked the switch from wanting to enforce those standards to wanting to tear them down.

The example which he thought went way too far was my decision to put the koala on the threatened species list.  Even though koala numbers in Queensland have plummeted by 40% since 1990 in Queensland he argued this was a bridge too far, citing the wonderful koala things he believed he was responsible for when he was a Mayor.

It got even sillier this week when his Deputy Premier went after me for caring too much about the Great Barrier Reef.  There’s an application on its way to me from Rio Tinto for its South of Embley project.  The original application didn’t refer to an increase in shipping movements as a result of the project, but it came out in the Environment Impact Statement that vessel movements would go up significantly and some of these additional movements will be through the Great Barrier Reef.

So I’ve insisted that these vessel movements need to be taken into account when the final decision comes to me.  The company is off doing this work now in good faith, and my department has been working to make sure subsequent delays are minimised.

There’s someone claiming to be a journalist at the Australian Financial Review by the name of Matthew Stevens who has decided the Queensland Government hasn’t gone nearly far enough in its rhetoric and is adding a fair bit of his own.

So for two days in a row now he’s invented motivations for me, guessed at how advice was put together and taken up the cause himself.  You can’t be precious in politics about someone having a go at you, but it’s important to note that at no stage has this bloke made any attempt to contact me or my office to verify whether any of his claims are true.  I put in a letter to the editor correcting the record yesterday which the Fin has decided to not publish.  A phone message I left for the editor was not returned.

Even from a purely business perspective it would have been madness for me to ignore the impact of shipping.  The easiest way for an environmental decision to be overturned in the courts is if you fail to consider something which was relevant.  Consider the impact on Rio Tinto if I had issued an approval which was then overturned in court in eighteen months time and they had to start all over again. 

The Queensland Government claimed my demand that shipping through the reef be considered is a classic example of Federal state duplication.  The only problem with that argument is the Queensland process didn’t consider those shipping impacts at all.

With the mining boom there are a series of projects coming up which potentially add up to very significant increases in shipping movements through the reef.  Demanded that those impacts be considered doesn’t necessarily mean the projects won’t be able to proceed. 

But to ignore those cumulative impacts would be negligent.

Most commented

52 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Lucas says:

      02:23pm | 24/05/12

      I own shares in Rio Tinto directly and through my super fund but care more about the reef (i don’t live in Queensland) than the increased cost to Rio. Too many times we have had vessels break down in and around the reef zone. It is quite simply a special place that should be protected. Accidents happen, oversights occur and the reef should not be put at risk of a broken down boat or a captain reading the charts slightly wrong. I’m sure the tourists that come to the reef can quite easily go to Indonesia instead where the biodiversity is fantastic and prices cheaper. Last thing we want is to make the reef less beautiful by having an accident killing off a species or section, or even just the sight of ships in the area.

    • GetRidOfCommies says:

      02:46pm | 24/05/12

      If we aren’t maximising the economic value of the reef we are wasting an opportunity to advance this country. Arguments about beauty or intrinsic value border on the absurd. The reef should be treated the same as every other patch of water.

      If our miners need it as a transport route it is economic vandalism to deny them this. As far as I’m concerned the miners should look into doing some exploratory surveys of the reef to see if there’s not more value in mining the reef.

    • Lucas says:

      03:01pm | 24/05/12

      The problem is how can you put a dollar value on that reef. So many people with a mind for environmental conservation value that reef and would feel poorer in a social sense if it was not around. But how do you measure that? It is not as easy as the value of the shipping lane (extra cost incurred by each vessels x number of vessels to use the lane)

      Just becuase you place a instrinsic value of zero on it does not mean everyone else does, the argument is not absurd but takes into account what many people in Australia value. Then there is also the issue of being a world heritage area, and that Australia has a duty to the world’s future generations to protect it. As other countries destroy their natural wonders, ours become ever more valuable to us as a commodity to market.

      By all means they can explore the reef, maybe there is the equivalent of the Saudi Arabian oil reserves under there. I might re-consider at that point but it would have to take some very serious economic advancement to make it worthwhile. The minister is not talking about mining the reef here but merely a shipping lane.

    • Steve says:

      03:06pm | 24/05/12

      I hope your taking the piss GetRidOfCommies, otherwise you’re a disgrace.

    • Chris L says:

      03:15pm | 24/05/12

      @GROC - It may do you some good to take a break from chasing dollars and have a look around at the world. Appreciating beauty can be cathartic and good for the blood pressure.

    • M says:

      03:18pm | 24/05/12

      GROC, whilst I agree with you that hobbling exporters with onerous environmental restrictions is suicide, we have to remember that the reef has taken tens of thousands of years to get to it’s current state, we can’t just fire tankers through it willy nilly for the sake of a quick buck.

      There’s no reason projects can’t be environmentally neutral or have their impact minimized and mitigated as much as possible. Capitalism and environmentalism aren’t mutually exclusive.

    • HappyCynic says:

      03:19pm | 24/05/12

      @GetRidOfCommies

      I’m sure you’re trolling and not serious but you do realise the reef isn’t just a simple stretch of water.  Since you’re looking at it from purely an economic perspective, people fly in from all over the world to swim on the Great Barrier Reef and it’s worth a shit load more than a few rocks in the ground are over the longer term.  It may only collect a few billion dollars a year in tourist money but the difference is the reef will still be there centuries after the rocks in the ground have been dug up and sold to our commie friends in China.

      Destroy it and you never get that long term value out of it.  Not even Campbell Newman would be as stupid as you to suggest mining the reef is a great idea.  Your suggestion is the only economic vandalism around here.

    • GetRidOfCommies says:

      03:24pm | 24/05/12

      No, it’s a disgrace that inner city communists put more value on a sea turtle than our mining companies who make this country run.

      Let me know when a turtle gives you a job.

    • Joe says:

      03:40pm | 24/05/12

      @GetRidofCommies…The problem is the great barrier reef is not like any other patch of water, it is the largest barrier reef in the world and a major tourist attraction for Queensland, with Access Economics estimating the reef generates over $1 billion worth of tourism annually, with other estimates being as high as $5 billion.

      Yet you say it is economic vandalism to deny industry the use of shipping, but wouldnt it also be economic vandalism to allow the reef to be damaged or destroyed and harm the tourism industry?

    • Inky says:

      03:44pm | 24/05/12

      @M

      Shut your filthy communist lies. We need to destroy nature premeptivly, before it can infringe on our business. Pre-emptive strikes and scorched earth tactics, before nature can respond with any so called “global warming” in retaliation. Only by completly destroying the environment in a co-ordinated, systematic strike can we ensure to be free to green retribution.

    • Lilly says:

      03:55pm | 24/05/12

      It’s more than beautiful it’s a food source for humans. Kill it and you kill not only the food but also a lot more jobs than Rio tinto could make up for.

    • M says:

      04:12pm | 24/05/12

      @ Inky,
      Shall we dust off and nuke it from orbit? it’s the only way to be sure.

    • Inky says:

      04:25pm | 24/05/12

      @M

      By the emperor, it shall be so!

    • Don says:

      07:46am | 25/05/12

      The federal government exists for the states - not the other way around. The sooner this snoozer realises that, the better.

    • NigelC says:

      02:29pm | 24/05/12

      ‘There’s someone claiming to be a journalist at the Australian Financial Review by the name of Matthew Stevens’. Minister, he doesn’t claim to be a journalist at all, he is the senior business columnist for the paper.
      Having worked for you in the past I suggest that the invented motivations, guessing at how advice was put together and not making contact with people is precisely the way you operate.
      As for the shipping through the reef, you got this one right and should be applauded for that and while I’m not making excuses for the columnist for poor behaviour on this occasion its amazing how karma works.

    • Maria says:

      08:52pm | 24/05/12

      I don’t think you did ever work on Tony Burke’s staff - aren’t you the one who used to put out media releases for Brendan Nelson?

    • NigelC says:

      11:52am | 25/05/12

      I know I didn’t work on his staff. I worked for one of his departments.

    • ghg says:

      02:29pm | 24/05/12

      Tony, You’ve forgotten Labor and its mindless ecologic were thrown out by people power at the last election. Yet you still persist with the same old rhetoric. This is not a Koala led economy is it?.

    • Gomez12 says:

      02:47pm | 24/05/12

      ghg,

      Totally agree, surely the election which handed The Greens their highest share of the vote in history can only be seen as Australia rejecting “ecologic”, how could it possibly be read otherwise?

    • ghg says:

      04:35pm | 24/05/12

      errr Gomez12, the Greens were trounced in the Qld State elections. Their vote decreased and they have no seats in Parliament.

    • Blue Light says:

      02:37pm | 24/05/12

      The big mining giants have too much sway on everything these days and something should be done to limit their lobbying power. I don’t envy your position Tony. On the one hand you have corporate sharks watching your every move, willing to wage war with you at any time if they don’t get their way and on the other hand you have the people of Australia screaming that their farms, their businesses, their environment are all being wiped out by the mining corporations. As a citizen, all I can do is urge you to be brave and to please do your best to preserve our beautiful natural resources which are far more valuable than money.

    • Gratuitous Adviser says:

      06:59am | 25/05/12

      Blue Light - Agree.  I lost faith in the big miners when they undertook that outrageous publicity campaign.  The great unwashed are so gullible.

      M - You must be very young.  I made a very nice living out of environmental and quality compliance and I can advise you that the only reason companies have anything to do with their environmental responsibilities is because of legislation and the potential for bad publicity leading to financial losses.

    • Tom says:

      02:44pm | 24/05/12

      I think most Australians have made their decision with regards to environment conservation -  they don’t think looking after it is worth its cost on the taxpayer.  The economy and working families are all that matters

    • last man standing says:

      02:53pm | 24/05/12

      Did someone pay you for this content fluff Tony?

      As they say, In politics the devil is in the detail.

    • year of the dragon says:

      03:09pm | 24/05/12

      First the Murdoch press now Fairfax: everyone’s out to go you aren’t they Mr Burke.

      Ban them all - Government approved publications only.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      03:33pm | 24/05/12

      Projects that can damage the great barrier reef are the height of stupidity.

      You don’t even have to make an environmental argument.

      The reef is much like the Murray River - you wreck it and your ****ed econimcally as well as environmentally.

    • M says:

      04:15pm | 24/05/12

      Damage can be mitigated. You might not realise this, but all the companies involved in this sort of thing are highly aware of the impact their projects have on the environment.

      We have 15 people employed in the Environmental department on the project I’m working on up here in gladstone, and they have no hangups about shutting the project down if the right criteria are met.

      Big business isn’t the uncaring, poluting, vandalising entity that it’s made out to be.

    • BrianP says:

      04:32pm | 24/05/12

      M, The trouble is that the Labor Party heavily relies on this rhetoric to muster support even though they know its a lie. If big business wrecks the environment then this means that in the 20 yr reign of Qld Labor they were unable to introduce any laws to counteract the problem. This is just an attempt to gain support form the gullible wannabe dogooders who don’t check facts and believe anything the Labor Party says.

    • Nat says:

      03:55pm | 24/05/12

      Toby Burke is one of the good ones in the Labor camp. Each decision he has made hasn’t been one that has destroyed the environment for short term gain. Stick to your guns tony. Most logical minded, caring Australians support you.

    • che says:

      04:04pm | 24/05/12

      Every time a politician says the word ‘bloke’ I shudder. It’s like they have a little pocket book of words ‘How To Sound Like a Normal Person’.

      This article doesn’t adress any real problems for the reef, it is just a whinge about how hard his job is and how everyone is picking on him.

    • Mattb says:

      04:51pm | 24/05/12

      campbell newman is nothing more that a little tinpot dictator with small mans syndrome. wouldnt be to concerned about him, hes just doing a bit of strutting and chest puffing, over-inflated by his resounding election win and the first negetive opinion poll will blow the wind right out of his sails.

      that negative poll isnt to far off
      -theres 40000 qld public service workers and their families he’s made redundant that arent to happy
      - his broken election promise not to increase rego, he claims he hasnt increased rego, just the insurance component of the rego!
      -and he’s talking about clawing back the rights of gays to civil unions aswell, another broken promise, which is putting some noses out of joint among the progressive voters that backed him.
      -then his over reaction in sending 200 police to move along 50 peacefull aboriginal protestors revived some memories of ‘sir joh’ and his police state antics.

      won be long before the polls turn against him and his cocky little attitude changes…

    • Steve Putnam says:

      05:21pm | 24/05/12

      Campbell Newman is obviously after Tony Abbott’s position as Clive Palmer’s no1 rent boy!

    • year of the dragon says:

      05:50pm | 24/05/12

      Keep it coming boys. Low-brow, personal attacks worked a treat for Anna Bligh.

    • Mattb says:

      06:26pm | 24/05/12

      captain blight, pfft, she’s yesterdays news, got the boot up the arse she rightly deserved.

      unfortunately she’s been replaced with something worse, corporal newman, the egotistical midget.

    • AnthonyG says:

      05:20pm | 24/05/12

      Tony Burke go back to punter to punter where you were relevent

    • Billy B says:

      05:24pm | 24/05/12

      MattB - For God’s sake put a few capital letters and some punctuation in you uneducated nob.

    • Chris L says:

      06:01pm | 24/05/12

      Try replying to the post you’re talking about.

    • Monorail User says:

      05:47pm | 24/05/12

      Labor will save The Barrier Reef and the Great Dividing Range !
      Liberal will destroy both and rip them both down!
      Remember what happened to the Monorail !

    • Against the Man says:

      06:11pm | 24/05/12

      Labor can’t even save itself!
      It is 3/4 of the way to extinction smile

    • Terry2 says:

      09:21pm | 24/05/12

      All commercial shipping over a certain tonnage, travelling via the GBR should have an Australian pilot onboard. It is a fundamnetal risk management measure. Failing to so legislate is inviting a major environmental disaster.

    • Arthur says:

      07:23am | 25/05/12

      If there’s oil there. It will be mined. Anyone thinking we will stop it long term is deluded.

    • Putin needs to improve his maths says:

      09:20am | 25/05/12

      What would Putin (I mean Newman) do? Oh yes. We know that. Ignore the risks from increased shipping.

      The problem I find with Mr Newman is that he is just no good at maths. He admitted that when talking to a young child during the election campaign when he couldn’t help them with a maths problem in the classroom.

      Now, outside the confines of a primary school classroom he has to use his basic maths to deal with real issues. He has stated that additional shipping does not increase risk to the reef. If you don’t change the way you manage the risk, the probability of any ship having an accident is the same. If you have more ships then the probability of an accident occurring on the reef is greater.

      Putin and his sidekicks needs to get better at maths, or listed to people who did pay more attention in year five.

    • I Live and work there! says:

      10:32am | 25/05/12

      Had this come from a credible Minister for the Environment instead of Tony Burke, unquestionably the most incompetant MP ever to hold a position, I would probably listen to his pathetic bleatings.

      Sadly, he has as much credibility as his PM does with the public and as such can only be treated as a joke.

      On his best day and on Newman’s worst day, the latter is about ten times more believable and professional!

      Burke is totally controlled by the Greens and the Unions and his track record to date reveals absolutely nothing credible or outstanding in way of significent achievements.

      The Great Barrier Reef is politically controlled by the kiss fishers of the far left Greens and the needs and concerns of the recreational and professional people living and working on the reef have been ignored since Labor took power.

      My home town of Cardwell on the FNQ coast was once a thriving, boisterous little town whose population knew how to care for the reef and the environment.

      Along came Burke and his Greens, and voila, five years later, Cardwell is dead! No tourism, no recreational fishermen, pro fishermen all gone and the population of this lovely little town is more than halved! The banned fishing and recreational zones, conceived without any REAL inputs from our communities ensured the killing off of all the industries that relied on a natural heritage system we KNEW how to look after!

      To make a living now, all tourism industries have doubled and tripled their prices trying to keep going and of course this has had the reverse effect of further killing tourism.

      Unemployment, particularly among the younger residents is around 15-17% and an eflux of population from most coastal towns has resulted in the loss of highly skilled and experienced operators who knew how to look after their own environment.

      I don’t have any experience with Koalas but if Burke has treated the members of the community with the same ill conceived insanity the Labor Government has brought upon we residents of FNQ, I can only assume that yet again his decision has been 100% influenced by the power grubbing Greens.

      What MP’s will do to hold their job eh? aka Gillard and Thompson!

      Hurry on 2014 when this wretched Government will be slaughtered like the Qld Labor party was .........................!

    • Oh How True says:

      01:11pm | 25/05/12

      OMG! Finally someone who has had the courage and ability to stand up and say it as it is!!

      I also live in FNQ and the above post is 110% correct in every way!

      We were never ever asked for our opinions on ANY issues over the GBR. My husband was a tourist operator doing no damage to the reef that he knew and loved more than any MP ever did!

      When Labor came in with their absurd and irresponsible laws for green zones, no go areas, we lost our business in a matter of a few months! And Tony Burke stood in our municipal hall and guaranteded that “none of you will lose you jobs”.

      He said “our research is correct. Trust us, this is the way to go ............”

      Tell that to my hubby who is now cutting grass part time for the local council!

    • Billy B says:

      05:18pm | 25/05/12

      Chris L - I did.  Read it for yourself Chris L.  MattB starts off - campbell newman is nothing more that a little tinpot dictator with small mans syndrome. wouldnt be to concerned about him, hes just doing a bit of strutting and chest puffing, over-inflated by his resounding election win and the first negetive opinion poll will blow the wind right out of his sails.  No capitals letters to start off the sentence and no punctuation.  Read it you lard head and you will see.

    • Billy B says:

      05:18pm | 25/05/12

      Chris L - I did.  Read it for yourself Chris L.  MattB starts off - campbell newman is nothing more that a little tinpot dictator with small mans syndrome. wouldnt be to concerned about him, hes just doing a bit of strutting and chest puffing, over-inflated by his resounding election win and the first negetive opinion poll will blow the wind right out of his sails.  No capitals letters to start off the sentence and no punctuation.  Read it you lard head and you will see.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter