The word ‘cancer’ still strikes fear into the minds of many people. The idea that a person can be walking about, apparently healthy, but secretly hosting a opportunistic disease which may have no cure, remains a concern for many. Add the rigours of chemotherapy treatment, and it is easy to understand the sentiments.

Screening like this can prolong the life of one person per year. Photo: Alan Pryke.

Yet some of the most common cancers can be prevented, or treated successfully, if detected early enough. Breast cancer is an example. A free screening program was introduced in 1991.

It provides free biennial mammograms to women aged 50 – 69 with no clinical manifestations of malignancy. Women in their 40s and over 70 can also access the program. The cost of the service is about $150 million a year.

According to the Cochrane Collaboration, an authoritative source on the effectiveness of health care interventions, for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will have her life prolonged.

The death rate from breast cancer has fallen from 30 per 100,000 women in 1994 to 22 per 100,000 women in 2008. (The actual numbers increased slightly from 2,655 in 1994 to 2,788 in 2008).

According to various studies, the cost-effectiveness of the screening ranged from approximately $20,000 to $50,000 per life year saved.

By comparison, bowel cancer kills 4,000 Australians each year – a rate of 73 each week. The incidence is expected to increase by up to 10 per cent a decade. Yet more than 90 per cent of these cancers can be cured if detected early.

The National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines recommend screening for bowel cancer at least every two years from age 50. This is because bowel cancer often develops without symptoms.

Despite these national health guidelines the current National Bowel Cancer Screening Program offers just one-off screening and is only available to those lucky enough to be in one of three select age groups – those turning 50, 55 or 65 before December .

There has been no commitment to the Program beyond this year. More than five million Australians aged over 50 are missing out on a simple test that could save their lives.It costs about a billion dollars a year to treat bowel cancer. Yet for about $150 million per year, all Australians over 50 could have the simple screening test.

About one in 20 people having the faecal occult blood testing require a colonoscopy. Eleven per cent of these are detected with cancer. According to data from Biogrid Australia, 41 per cent of cancers found through screening are at the most curable stage, compared with just 18 per cent found outside the Program after the presentation of symptoms.

Screening also detects 19 per cent of patients with an advanced adenoma and 16 per cent with a small adenoma, which can be readily treated with the removal of the polyps.

If fully implemented, the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program could prevent 1,300 cancer deaths each year.

Providing free two-yearly screening for every Australian over 50 will result in substantial savings in hospital costs. Removing a precancerous polyp detected through screening costs around $1,600, while treatment at a public hospital for bowel cancer can cost in excess of $70,000.

Over the past three years, the Labor government has wasted billions of dollars on handouts, pink batts, inadequate school halls and the like, while failing to guarantee a health prevention program that would save the lives of people and comfort many family members.

Most commented

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      05:35am | 08/12/10

      Perhaps Food Standards Australia, and the Australian Quarantine Inspection Service should play a greater role in assuring the quality of imported food? What controls are there on the chemicals used on crops in other countries?
      http://australia.gov.au/directories/australia/food-standards

    • Jim says:

      06:24am | 08/12/10

      What the bloody hell does that have to do with Kevin’s piece? You truly are on another planet acotrel…

    • Jotun says:

      04:34pm | 08/12/10

      Not sure Jim, could be a very tenuous link between chemicals present on imported foods and cancer maybe?

      Also, Kevin Andrews talking sense? I am amazed, and pleased.

    • dead to me says:

      06:11am | 08/12/10

      Health care. With the ALP what can I say. Remember KRudd (Wikileak hero of the day) and his ‘the buck stops with me’? That was in 2008. Remember the promoise of 100% take over of health by the Federal ALP? What a flat out lie that turned out to be. Billions spent but we still see a shortage of doctors and nurses and the training of doctors and the development of preventative health programs as well as improvements in Aboriginal health. Has the great Miniter Roxon been asleep at the wheel or what?

      Families I work with all over NSW and QLD are saying that health care is getting worse, long ED waiting times, increase length of waiting times for elective surgeries, patient kicked out of hospital prematurely because beds are needed etc.

      The ALP zombies can say whatever they like but the number of Australians growing disenchanted by Miss Gillard and her incapable Minister Roxon is increasing on a daily basis.

    • acotrel says:

      07:48am | 08/12/10

      Jim, Do you know anything about cancer, and the likely causes of it?

    • NicoleG says:

      08:29am | 08/12/10

      Look Jim, acotrel want to play hide and seek with you again. Oh well, if anything acotrel, you make me laugh. At you that is.

    • TChong says:

      08:46am | 08/12/10

      Dtm, lotsa people talking to you, about this issue ?, You work in “Health”?
      If you did work in the area, you’d know that waiting lists, ED waiting times etc etc, have always been unacceptable , outrageous etc since civilisation began.
      As some one who does work in “Health”, I can assure you ,the problems are exactly the same Liberal / Labor , state or federal.
      And, what was Howards and Abbotts plan ?- the commonwealth takeover of ONE hospital in a marginal electorate in Tasmainia, and promise to relive Wandin Valley , with local boards - a guaranteed path to nepotism, and vested interests holding sway.
      This was the reality of “boards “in regional / rural Oz.
      Neither side of politics has anything to be proud about in relation to “health”.

    • Mr Jackie says:

      10:47am | 08/12/10

      TChong aka ALP stooge. I work in health and the ALP and minister Roxon are the ultimate failures who have let us down. This current government has had enough time to fix this problem. Look at the Sydney Morning Herald today about how doctors are not able to give patients the pallative care they deserve due to more Medicare cuts. Roxon is an incompetent lawyer who has not one iota of knowledge of how health care should be managed. Shame on the ALP and all their supports for supporting a government that doesn’t support Australia!

    • Call for fresh elections says:

      11:55am | 08/12/10

      @TChong Don’t ever try to pin this on the Howard era government mate. Rudd/Gillard had since 2007 to get things right, not to make things worse. The good Minister Roxon is famous for boasting about all the Federal spending on healthcare but where are the results. Don’t just brag to the media about more physical hospital beds without telling the public there are no staff to manage those beds; you can’t fool all of us all of the time.

    • Jim says:

      06:31am | 08/12/10

      I think there should be an age limit on treatment…the human body isn’t designed to live much past 55-60. Callous maybe, but when the treatments cost so much and research funding falling short of where it needs to be, I’d much rather see the millions wasted on keeping a +75 year old alive for another 6 months diverted into research.
      I’m also not very surprised at the breast cancer statistics versus those of bowel cancer. All diseases are terrible, but some seem to be more ‘newsworthy’ than others and get a disproportionate level of attention. The story a few days ago about anorexia was a good example - a tiny proportion of mental health cases get a large slice of the pie.

    • acotrel says:

      08:19am | 08/12/10

      ’ I’d much rather see the millions wasted on keeping a +75 year old alive for another 6 months diverted into research.’

      Big on the ‘value judgements’, aren’t we ,JIm? Perhaps the 75 year old you’re referring to has lead the Liberal Party for 50 years, paid millions in tax to justify getting looked after, and is a really good guy with a sense of humour, and likes cricket?  Would you still divert the money required to treat him?

    • marley says:

      09:24am | 08/12/10

      Well, even in the days of the Bible, man’s lifespan was three score and ten, so the argument that we’re not designed to live past 55-60 is nonsense.

      And I’d rather see the money going to an active 70 year old who needs knee surgery than to a chronically obese 40 year old smoker who refuses to change his lifestyle, notwithstanding type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and emphysema. 

      By the way, my Dad had a hip replacement at the age of 77, and enjoyed another 15 years of life.  Was that a waste of dollars?  I don’t think so.  It was certainly worth it to my Mom, my sister, myself, all his siblings, nieces and nephews and friends.  And of course to my Dad.

    • Jim says:

      09:36am | 08/12/10

      What the hell does cricket and politics have to do with anything?? You amaze me Mr C…

      Even if it was me at 75, I would much rather see the hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep me around spent on research to prevent kids even needing treatment.

    • True Believer says:

      03:41pm | 08/12/10

      This is the sad, sick, mindless thinking that makes intelligent, caring, people of integrity shudder at the thought of putting human lives in the hands of a seemingly callous generation through legalising murder/assisted suicide under the euphemism of “euthanasia”.

      I think Jim if and when you ever get to 75 you thinking will be much more mature and this attitude will be something that hopefully you will have shed with the wisdom of years.

    • True Believer says:

      03:41pm | 08/12/10

      This is the sad, sick, mindless thinking that makes intelligent, caring, people of integrity shudder at the thought of putting human lives in the hands of a seemingly callous generation through legalising murder/assisted suicide under the euphemism of “euthanasia”.

      I think Jim if and when you ever get to 75 you thinking will be much more mature and this attitude will be something that hopefully you will have shed with the wisdom of years.

    • Bitten says:

      07:50am | 08/12/10

      Screening programs are always controversial. People would do better to simply take responsibility for their own health. If you want to go preemptive strike for a particular disease, then do so. The choice is yours. Breast, ovarian and skin cancers are my personal furbies, so I have an annual skin check, self-check my breasts regularly and have annual gynae and breast ultrasounds (late 20s, so mammograms not indicated for screening as yet). My choice, my health, my peace of mind. No one else can give that to me.

    • acotrel says:

      08:10am | 08/12/10

      Bitten, my two younger sisters died as a result of breast cancer.  There should be more research into causes, rather than detection.  We know the gene is in the family, however that is not a ‘cause’. It seems to be related to hormone levels.

    • acotrel says:

      07:53am | 08/12/10

      Preventive medicine is not about discovering you have a disease.  It’s about PREVENTION! For example sun dried tomatos from asian countries where Hep A is endemic are a health risk - who’s checking our imports?

    • acotrel says:

      08:04am | 08/12/10

      I don’t want to discover I have cancer, I want to AVOID it ! The’ buy everything offshore and make a big profit’ ideology is flawed.  The level playing field is not level, when other countries don’t have the same amount regulation in the interests of food safety, and health. For years the Australian Government conducted tests on beef exports to Japan,  for pesticide residues.  Are we really supposed to believe that Asian and middle eastern countries act similarly towards us, and control the quality of their products so we don’t get chronic exposure to cancer causing materials?

    • Holly says:

      08:06am | 08/12/10

      Maybe people can request an occult blood test from their doctor.  If they are on a benefit or have health care card then they will be bulk billed for Dr’s visit and screening test.  Maybe doctors could be a bit more proactive in this regard in advising their patients.

      Yes, breast screening is available for women but we still have to have the nous to get ourselves there. 

      Maybe we should be asking why bowel cancer is increasing at the rate of 10% per year.  Is it lifestyle related?  I think that is the tack Acrotel was trying to take.

    • acotrel says:

      08:23am | 08/12/10

      Holly, certain pesticides and fertilisers are banned in Australia, for very good reasons!

    • Jim says:

      08:36am | 08/12/10

      Holly…you’ll go crazy trying to interpret anything acotrel says or does…he is incapable of (a) making sense, and (b) posting a reply in the correct thread.
      I’m 99% sure I’ve met him in RL years ago, and I had the same opinion back then as I have now after 6 months reading The Punch!

    • Shane says:

      08:24am | 08/12/10

      That’s all well and good, Mr Andrews, but there was Bi-partisan agreement on a Bowel Cancer Screening Program long before Kevin07. Howard and the Liberal party are as much to blame for the hand-wringing and hesitancy around this life-saving test.

      As such, your attempt to play politics with the situation sounds hollow at best and opportunistic at worst. Both sides of politics should be out-and-out ashamed about this. It is beggars belief that the full bowel cancer screening program is not in place. Every Australian, every two years after 50, should be entitled to this test for free. Yes, it is available at the chemist or your GP, but population-based screening saves lives that self-motivated screening does not. If it were a similarly effective and economical test for breast cancer we would have had it a decade ago. But no no no, not with the less glamouress and Kylie-less *hushed tones* bowel cancer.

      Acrotel, the rise in bowel cancer can be pretty easily linked to the obesity epidemic. After all, it’s been shown that once you reach measurements of an 85cm waistline in women or a 100cm waitline in men, there is a sharp rise in the risk of bowel cancer. Perhaps there is merit to your imported food theory, but that is for a different discussion…

    • acotrel says:

      09:32am | 08/12/10

      ‘Acrotel, the rise in bowel cancer can be pretty easily linked to the obesity epidemic.’

      That’s a pretty brave statement - because there is correlation, doesn’t prove causality! If we stop eating, we won’t get bowel cancer.  I agree with your assertion that Kevin Andrews is trying to play politics with people’s fear of cancer!

    • Jim says:

      09:41am | 08/12/10

      “...because there is correlation, doesn’t prove causality!”

      But it did yesterday? What’s changed?

    • Shane says:

      10:05am | 08/12/10

      Some light reading, acotrel -

      “Body Mass and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the NIH-AARP Cohort.” American Journal of Epidemiol,ogy 2007

      “Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC Study).” Journal of the National Cancer Institute

      “Obesity and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.” World Journal of Gastroenterol, 2007

      Long story short? If you are arguing semantics, then obesity itself doesn’t cause cancer, in the same way that smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer. In either case the direct cause is an error in cell production. However, a risk factor for the likelihood of such a cell mutation occuring in the bowel is, loosely, a higher Body Mass Index. The BMI is a flawed measure, for sure, but waistline and overall weight have been shown over large population-based and peer-reviewed studies to increase the risk of bowel cancer.

      At the very least, I can point to evidence. Your food-import conspiracy relies on your own suspicion and the fact that two events (importing foreign food without regulation and a rise in cacner rates) occur at the same time. What was that again about correlation not proving causality?

      Oh, and FYI, the cancer rate is rising in large part due to an aging population, improved diagnostic methods, and better treatment resulting in a second diagnosis for an unfortunate number of people. Feel free to query this claim, I am more than willing to provide some more light reading.

    • acotrel says:

      08:38am | 08/12/10

      The National Heath & Medical Research Council should do more research into the relationships between chronic exposure to pesticides in imported food,  therapeutic substances, and cancer. - instead of recommending more testing of likely victims!

    • Jacob says:

      09:05am | 08/12/10

      OK, we get it, you don’t trust food imports. Three comments is enough, I would think…

    • Jim says:

      09:39am | 08/12/10

      You forgot to say ‘paradigm’ somewhere…we know context is extremely, ummm, optional(?) with you…so do us all proud mate. Throw it in today somewhere…I think the count is up over 60 now!

    • acotrel says:

      01:18am | 09/12/10

      Shane, the obesity factor in cancer, could be explained by the fact that most organic chemicals are lipophilic.  I’m only aware of one Australian authority which has investigated the effects of pesticides etc. on the human body.  It was the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Aviation Medicine Branch, quite a few years ago.  I was involved, and I have an idea what’s in our bodies. There is indication of an effect in the evidence of increasing occurrence of asthma, and autism amongst our kids.  If I was looking for causes, I’d be analysing the food.  I know there is a reporting process which doctors undertake, but I wonder who’s looking these days?  I doubt the NH&MRC; is up to the task of ringing the warning bells!

    • Mr Mustela says:

      08:48am | 08/12/10

      Guess they didn’t have bowel cancer back in the days when the coalition ruled the world.

    • commonsensegirlonline says:

      09:18am | 08/12/10

      Politics aside, what we put into our bodies in the way of food and beverages certainly does have an effect on our health.  That has been substantially documented and acotrel is very much on the right track. Imported foodstuffs often produced in less than clean, hygenic circumstances and filled with ingredients nobody can pronounce do not go through the same testing processes that our own homegrown produce does.  The bottom line is: if you put chemicals into your body that it does not require or want, you suffer the consequences. The problem is made worse when we simply do not know what is in the foodstuffs we are consuming and there has been ample evidence of “stuff” coming into our country which is highly unsuitable for any body, human or animal. In the days prior to “fast food” the incidence of cancers of any kind in our country was extremely low.  One doesn’t have to be Einstein to work out why the increases now.

    • acotrel says:

      09:57am | 08/12/10

      With the cancer thing, even though I love roast chicken, I’m apprehensive about the growth hormones used in production of it.  We’ve moved to a new PARADIGM which reflects the US mindset of anything goes, as long as we make a profit! (OK, Jim?)

    • Andrew says:

      10:59am | 08/12/10

      Your logic is utterly, fatally, flawed.  Incidence of cancer was ‘lower’ back in the ‘good old days’ mainly because of one simple thing - it wasn’t diagnosed.  People got sick and died, death certificate read ‘natural causes’ or ‘old age’, and that was it.  No examination, no proper diagnosis.  The same thing still happens.  Did you know that if you did an autopsy on every dead male over 60, more than 80% would have prostate cancer.  Yup, 80%.  However because it is mostly a slow-acting form of cancer (mostly, certainly not always), and affects primarily older men, most sufferers die of something else before it becomes their primary health concern.  But they still have it.  Yes, certain chemicals seem to increase the likelihood of cancer, as do many other things such as weight, lifestyle, cardiovascular health, air quality, etc, etc.  But saying that these are the primary and only cause of cancer is ridiculous.  There’s strong evidence that many ‘historical figures’ from thousands of years ago died of cancer of one form or another, well before the invention of pesticides, preservatives, or MSG.  It happens, for many reasons, and early detection is still the BEST form of treatment.  Sure, live a healthy lifestyle and try to avoid risk factors, that’s only sensible.  But if you think that will give you immunity from cancer, you’re sadly mistaken.  Screening programs not only save thousands of lives, but also billions of dollars in treatment costs.  They make sense.

    • Shane says:

      12:22pm | 08/12/10

      acotrel, There haven’t been hormones or steroids added to Aussie chicken in generations.

    • candy hunter says:

      10:49am | 08/12/10

      cancer still strikes fear into the mindd and hearts of most people.
      aries, Taurus, gemiini,Leo ,Virgo, Libra, scorpio, sagitarrius , capricorn, aquarius and pisces can match the perfection, the excellence, the beauty, the brains, the emotions, personalities and talent of Cancer. Your comment:

    • jane wallace says:

      10:51am | 08/12/10

      cancer is more than just a disease.
      cancer is a way of life.
      cancer takes over all life.

    • BT says:

      11:05am | 08/12/10

      Vegetarians experience 40% less cancer than meat eaters, and 50% less heart disease. Australians don’t like being told this and governments don’t make this widely known because it means that farmers of beef etc will be out of a job, and also because they will have to stop stuffing their faces with fast food and actually prepare something for themselves that is healthy.
      http://www.cancerproject.org/survival/cancer_facts/meat.php

    • Shane says:

      11:25am | 08/12/10

      The only decent study into vegetarianism and cancer showed a 40% reduction in blood cancers, not all cancers. It showed only a slight reduction in cancers overall. It also conceded that these figures could be attributed (at least in part) to people overconsuming meat of poor quality ie fast food. Modest servings of lean, good quality meat two or three times a week has been proven to have little to zero affect on cancer risk overall. You are right, self-preparation is a great thing. But you inflate the ability of vegetarianism to cut someone’s cancer risk.

    • Jim says:

      11:48am | 08/12/10

      No doubt those stats are real BT, but does it say anything about lifestyle? I may be drawing a long bow here, but most vegetarians I know are living the life in places like Bellingen or Kangaroo Valley…totally stress free.

      I knew a vegetarian that was one of the world’s most well known radio-astronomer in the 80’s. She died of multiple brain tumours aged 32’ish. I also know a 104 year old who still smokes a pack a day and still complains that you cannot buy Ardath anywhere. In my family there is not one incidence of cancer, ever. Even going back several generations.

      It’s something that cannot be pidgeon holed into a particular cause or group…it’s just a nasty, evil disease.

    • BT says:

      12:16pm | 08/12/10

      Shane not sure what study you are referring to but the British Medical Journal and United Nations both state these statistics and I know there are many other studies that have confirmed this. Jim, 20% of the world’s population is vegetarian, a high percentage of those living in Asia so it’s not entirely lifestyle based (although yes I think stress does play a part in overall health).

    • Kate says:

      01:35pm | 08/12/10

      Vegetarians who preach are 50% more annoying than meat-eaters. True facts.

    • Shane says:

      01:36pm | 08/12/10

      BT, do you mean the BMJ study of 10,000 or so people that concluded “Our data do not provide justification for encouraging meat eaters to change to a vegetarian diet.” They couldn’t say that vegetarianism was the sole or even major cause of the reduced mortality.

      Alternatively, you might want to check out the more recent WHO EPIC study involving over half a million people that concluded that a diet high in red meat (particularly processed red meat) absolutely does increase the risk of bowel cancer. On the other hand Fish, chicken, poultry and a moderate intake of lean red meat saw no increase in bowel cancer risk.

      So, ultimately, if someone such as myself chooses to eat read meat twice a week in a moderate serve, chicken one night, and fish another, my risk is the same as a vegetarians.

    • Gee Jay says:

      02:37pm | 08/12/10

      As a survivor of both prostate and bowel cancer; i can attest to the yearly checkup for both conditions.. But saying that governments should be pushing us for these tests is passing the buck!  We are responsible for our own longevity…

    • Alyssa KT says:

      04:25pm | 08/12/10

      There was no money wasted on pink batts; it was the dodgy brothers who installed the foil because there was more profit in it (and they employed unskilled workers to do it) who caused the deaths and fires. Pink Batts don’t conduct electricity - or require staples.

    • acotrel says:

      01:25am | 09/12/10

      Alyssa, we should never let the truth get in the way of a good story!  Far better to slander Peter Garrett, it might cause the collapse of the Labor government!

    • Alyssa KT says:

      09:04am | 09/12/10

      Exactly Acotrel, it’s interesting how they need to run with all of these mistruths…
      I’ve also seen some data that shows there were LESS fires caused by roof insulation during the scheme than on previous years… curiously no one mentions that…
      It’s this lack of rebuttal that annoys me about Labor - how is it I can find out this information and yet they allow Liberals to make the most (hollow) noise?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @jackaargh: @farrm51 @murpharoo Is the plural of humdrum hadra?

tory_maguire

Why didn't he cop a contempt charge? http://t.co/kO9wqscaQH

ToryShepherd

@anderson_lainie He he. And congrats to Max!

ToryShepherd

@VictoriaPurman Then you should have included sex toys and yoga ;-)

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter