Private debt has been fattened up like a porkie

The debate the government deficit reminds me of the slogan that The Sheep from Animal Farm chanted in support of The Pigs: “Four legs good, Two legs bad”. Anything The Pigs did was OK, because they were Animals, and therefore good. Anything Humans did was not, because they walked on two legs and were therefore bad.

Ditto the debate over the debt levels being accumulated by the Federal Government in response to the Global Financial Crisis: it seems that Government debt is “two legged”, while private debt incurred is “four legged”.

How else can you explain the complete indifference that both sides of politics have displayed to the explosion in private debt over the last two decades, and the scorn and shame associated with the recent increase in government debt?

For the record, “two legged” private debt now stands at $1,917 billion. Households owe over $1 trillion on mortgages and $139 billion on personal debt, and businesses owe the remaining $755 billion.
“Four legged” government debt currently stands at a comparatively trivial $47 billion, and is projected to rise to $188 billion by 2013.

I think the Treasury’s projections of government debt levels are fantasy, based on the rosy belief that “the deepest global recession since the Great Depression” (as Treasury itself describes it), will result in an unemployment rate of only 8.5 percent. But even so, a debt level twice that bad would still be less than a third of what Australian households currently owe on their bricks, mortar and plasma TVs.

So why is government debt bad and private debt good? Because both Labor and Liberal subscribe to what might be called the Pig theory of economics, in which private debt is supposed to reflect rational decisions by the private sector, while government debt reflects wasteful expenditure by the government.

I hope enough Australians are not as Sheep-like on this issue as the Pigs think we are.

Baaaa, wasn’t this crisis caused by excessive private debt—especially in the USA with its Subprime Scam, but also here and across the rest of the OECD? Wasn’t a lot of that debt utterly wasteful—borrowed money betting that share and house prices always rise? Or even worse, borrowed to concoct financial products that were once called “Derivatives” and are now more accurately described “Toxic Assets”?

Baaaaa, aren’t governments worldwide going into debt to try to spend their economies out of the recession caused by a collapse in private spending? Isn’t the recession itself is a direct result of all this private borrowing going bad? Wouldn’t the Liberals be running up public debt now, if they had won the last election? So why criticise Labor for doing what you’d do, if you were in their hoofs?

Baaaaa, weren’t public assets run down during the last two decades while tax revenue was handed back as tax cuts? Don’t we need to spend on our hospitals, schools and rail now, to make up for a decade of neglect as the private sector partied?

But while The Sheep may doubt the Pig theory that private is always good and public always bad, it takes a while for such realism to seep into The (Parliament) House, where the two Pig factions fight it out over ideology rather than sense. Just as the Animals in the end couldn’t pick the difference between Pigs and Humans, distinguishing Liberal from Labor over debt is pretty challenging.

Maybe we need to replace The Pigs with an entirely different breed of Animal.

7 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve Keen says:

      09:36pm | 11/06/09

      Peter called the crisis very well from his Austrian economics perspective. There are similarities between Austrian economics and parts of Hyman Minsky’s work, which is the foundation for my analysis, so I agree with some of Schiff’s arguments.

      But I think he is wrong on a number of monetary issues again because he subscribes to the Austrian school of thought on that front. it’s too technical a thing to try to answer in a simple reply here, but the basic story is that he would blame the entire crisis on Greenspan keeping interest rates too low in the first 6 years of the 21st century; I instead see this as merely the end game of a long period of debt-financed Ponzi behaviour, and blame Greenspan for delaying what should have been a corrective crisis back in 1987 for a further 20 years.

    • Anthony says:

      05:07am | 12/06/09

      Steve
      Your full of critisisms but don’t have much positive to say yourself.
      Private debt is less bad then government debt. If a company goes bankrupt the costs are limited to the stakeholders. If a country goes bankrupt we are all screwed.
      I think your so named ‘Pig theory of economics’, in which private debt is supposed to reflect rational decisions by the private sector, can work with the right regulations and reduced complexity.

    • Peter H says:

      02:21pm | 12/06/09

      How silly is that Anthony -  Govt’s can stop going bankrupt if debt is well managed and controlled.

      The big problem arises when Government encourages people (as in the previous Howard Govt.) to go into debt to purchase bigger homes than they need, flashier cars than they need, etc. etc. - and then that said Government wastes a windfall in taxes from the mining boom.

      $314bill. from a boom and what to show for it.  Rudd may or may not have a $300bill debt but we will have a lot to show for it.

    • Anthony says:

      02:37am | 15/06/09

      Kruddy better have something to show for it!
      Or he will be back in opposition darn soon. We shall wait and see.

    • AupdambSyday says:

      02:07am | 18/09/09

      Hello,
      baserdasew
      <a >meridia no prescription</a>
      The generic name of meridia is sibutramine.
      <a >meridia cost</a>
      Furthermore, it’s necessary to intake Meridia with a diet program of reduced level of calories.
      http://www.acid-reflux-symptoms.net/ - buy meridia
      Moreover, due to a huge risk for infants, never breastfeed while preferring Meridia.

    • AupdambSyday says:

      12:03pm | 27/09/09

      Hello
      baserdasew
      <a >purchase phentermine</a>
      With this, you would be able to lessen a possibility that an allergic reaction or a harmful side effect due to factors related to using Phentermine without identifying first if it suits the person.
      <a >phentermine diet pills</a>

      This drug works by releasing certain chemicals in your brain.
      http://www.therapymarketing.net/ - phentermine no prescription
      If your intention is to help somebody with the same condition as you have, it is advisable to talk to hat person about Phentermine and suggest that they have a consultation and ask the doctor if they could give a prescription if that person is qualified to take Phentermine.

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Time to put this summer of cricket out of its misery, writes Anthony Sharwood. Hear hear! http://bit.ly/9OLM07

David Penberthy

@geoffb oh, diddums.

David Penberthy

@Adam_Sims hell yeah. the recent past of australian tennis is in doubt!

David Penberthy

Libs reckon the future of australian tennis is in doubt due to rudd's ETS. They're smoking the same stuff as screaming lord monckton #qt

Gentle jabs to the ribs

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

Usually, when it comes to watching your favourite sport or movie on television, ads are the last thing… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter