It’s sobering to know that Australia has now joined the ranks of nations lining up to grapple with the obesity epidemic affecting its citizens.

Where did all the happy little Vegemites go?

Equally dismal is the news relating to mental health, that tells us that suicide is now the number one killer of all Australians under 35.

What does this say about the image of ‘the lucky country’ and the land of the ‘fair go’ that we hold so close to our national identity? What has happened over the last decades that has brought us to this point, and most importantly, how can we move forward in creating a healthier Australia?

The good news is that as a nation we are now beginning to recognise that we need a similar kind of ‘revolution’ in healthcare as we do in education. The bad news is that we are still thinking of this in terms of increasing doctors, nurses and hospital beds to meet demand, rather than creating a more dispersed system of preventive health embedded in community and recalling the ‘self-help’ ethic that surfaced some 40 years ago.

Building more institutional infrastructure and attracting greater numbers of staff to the medical profession may well be needed, but is not a sustainable solution within the context of a population that is both ageing and increasing at a rapid rate.

Instead, we need to consider a broader reorganisation and redistribution of roles and relationships associated with supporting physical and mental health, taking the focus away from treating the symptoms within the walls of hospitals and clinics and supporting the family to play a greater, more informed role in addressing the root causes of obesity and mental health.

The findings of the latest Australian Social Trends report released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics suggest that disadvantaged communities are a critical place to start.

We have known for many years that there are significant disparities in the health outcomes of different populations within Australia, and that people who live in areas with poorer socioeconomic conditions tend to have worse health - including higher levels of disease risk factors and lower use of preventive health services – than those who experience socioeconomic advantage. This disparity persists because the burden of addressing it has been focused squarely on the health care sector rather than society as a whole.

This approach has failed and indeed will continue to fail because the health of individuals is today dependent not on treating isolated symptoms with particular medicines, but on lifestyles and deeply ingrained behaviours that are influenced and maintained by a range of social and market forces over which health care providers have no control.

We all understand that as the first and most influential role models of future generations, it is parents who sow the seeds of positive healthy behaviours and attitudes from the pre-natal period well into their children’s teenage and adult lives. 

And yet the way we have organised our society hinders disadvantaged parents from doing exactly that – pricing fresh food beyond the means of their limited disposable income and instead allowing cheap fast-food outlets to proliferate in low SES communities as the most convenient alternative.

With few opportunities to improve their own typically poor levels of education or to role model positive nutrition to their kids, it becomes clear why unhealthy behaviours quickly become embedded across family generations.

We need to put these families back at the centre of social change and recognise that health is a peculiarly social as well as physical phenomenon.

It is not the provision of more doctors and nurses, needed though they may be, that will create a healthier Australia, but rather increasing the capacity of all individuals to engage in the responsible, collaborative maintenance of their own health through self-help. 

While disadvantaged communities may be overly represented in the cohort of unhealthy Australians, the challenges encompass all of us, regardless of background. Many parents today spend long hours commuting into congested and polluted cities, where expensive fitness clubs jostle for access to the half-hour of free time these people may have to get active in their day.

Art, sport and music programs are being cut from school budgets across the country, depriving kids of opportunities to develop the self-esteem and emotional literacy they need to help them develop into effective and contributing adults.

And as safe, outdoor spaces shrink as we rush towards an ever more urbanised, high-rise society, there are fewer opportunities and incentives for kids to leave the various digital screens of the tv, computer or mobile phone and engage in outdoor physical activity (often not encouraged by time-poor parents juggling the work life balance).

Are we really surprised at the unhealthy lifestyles and impacts this kind of society is creating? 

Responsibility for a healthier Australia also rests with our corporate community. In an era of transparency enabled by technology and the Internet, how companies are seen to respond to the social impact of their work is becoming increasingly important.

We now need them to demonstrate a longer-term perspective and take responsibility for the impacts they have on the world for which they are not necessarily obliged under law to be accountable for.

Some companies have already recognised the importance of this approach, proactively changing their practice with a view to avoiding community backlash, such as the swift move by members of the food industry in the last decade to remove trans-fats from their products well before legislation came in to enforce such a move.

The status quo in Australia is not an option. If this situation is to change, we need to redistribute healthcare responsibilities, resources and expertise across communities and households, rather than concentrating them solely within the walls of institutions.

We need to use these resources collaboratively to share ideas, provide mutual support and give voice to user needs; and we need to recognise and act upon the responsibility we all share in creating a healthier, happier and more harmonious Australia.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:54am | 23/04/10

      “Equally dismal is the news relating to mental health, that tells us that suicide is now the number one killer of all Australians under 35.”

      Of those suicides, approximately four-fifths are male. Yet this is rarely mentioned.

      Why are young men killing themselves so often? What is it about our society that disproportionately affects men’s perception of the value of their own lives?

      One important indicator of high suicide rates is social disadvantage. Another, I suspect, may be social discrimination and vilification.

      Of course, even without taking suicide into account, men die seven years earlier than women. But this doesn’t seem to be regarded as a major health issue.

    • Peter K says:

      09:17am | 23/04/10

      Good point. But I think Howard was disingenuous carrying on about the threat of terrorism and the threat of other races for so long. (And he had a choice to direct public monies into male mental health or the “war on scarier”.) The statistics are as you say - you are more likely to die by your own hand than by terrorism, sharks or other scary things. Howard (and Rudd to a lesser extent) could have showed leadership and focussed all the war hysteria into saving Aussie lives… but then that doesn’t get votes… Good segue way into ANZACs sacrificing males for whatever the current excuse is.

      Likewise hundreds of thousands of Aussie women, kids and men are daily terrorised by domestic violence (or ghetto violence if they are living in dysfunctional suburbs ) but again that’s not really a headline grabber or vote winner..and doesn’t sell
      newspapers as much as terrorists do!

    • T.Chong says:

      09:31am | 23/04/10

      Ecca, havent you learnt that some subjects are strictly taboo?
      To raise any issue about mens health is just clear evidence to the misandists (the men hating women, and their gormless male supporters) that you are part of the patriarchal conspiracy to deny women their place in the sun.
      To believe anything other than all women are all victims all the time is what stops every woman from being incredibly successful in any and everything they do.
      Be ashamed, very ashamed .

    • Sam says:

      09:52am | 23/04/10

      This may shock you to hear but most women love men, they do, they love their partners, their sons, their brothers and their friends.  Most women do not hate men or go out of their way to do what they can to hurt, humiliate and bring them down.  It is quite concerning that so many of our young men are hurting in such a way that they take their own life just like it is quite concerning that so many of our young women are.  The fact that there is more of one sex than the other doing it shouldn’t be the point as even just one life lost because they see no hope for themselves or their future is a terrible thing.

      It’s sad that you see women as the enemy and the cause for all pain and heartache amongst men and I suspect it is because you yourself have experienced abuse from women.  You probably have every right to feel this way, just like a woman who has been victimised or abused by a man will feel distrust and fear and anger towards man. 

      I would suggest anyone who has experienced a hurt from the opposite sex to make every effort they can to reconnect with women/men again as it is this that will repair that hurt and essentially help you to get over what happened and become one of those blissfully happy people who hear about horrible things one sex says or thinks or does to the other and doesn’t despair or become angry and bitter because they know in their world life just isn’t like that for them.

    • marley says:

      09:59am | 23/04/10

      Eric - you’re quite right that the male suicide rate is something like 4 times the female suicide rate.  That is not something new.  It has been the case for the last 100 years.  It’s a serious issue, of course, but it has nothing to do with social “vilification” (which I take to mean the rise of feminism.)  It’s roots like much further back in time.

    • Eric says:

      10:03am | 23/04/10

      Sam, where exactly did I say that I see “women as the enemy and the cause for all pain and heartache amongst men”? You are making assumptions about something that isn’t there.

      I have never blamed women collectively for anything. Feminists, on the other hand, are very much to blame for a great deal of sexism, hurt and misery.

    • Eric says:

      10:13am | 23/04/10

      Incidentally, there is some interesting information about suicide statistics in this ABC News article.

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/04/29/2556259.htm

      “The research found major factors that contributed to suicide included the breakdown of relationships, debilitating injuries and family problems.”

      The relationship breakdown/family problem correlation would definitely include the large number of men who kill themselves because of unfair family law decisions.

      Imagine losing your children, being denied the right to see them, and on top of that being forced to hand over much of your property and income to the person who took them away. That’s a significant factor in male suicide which usually goes unreported.

      “The conference has also been told the Australian Defence Forces have a lower level of suicide than the general public.”

      I speculate that this is because men have a valued role in the ADF, where masculine virtues are appreciated and rewarded. In society at large, men are continually denigrated in the media, during education, and at other times, resulting in feelings of depression. Again, it’s not an issue that is pursued with any vigour.

    • OldGirl says:

      10:17am | 23/04/10

      Sam my son is the apple of my eye, I feel totally blessed to have had the privilege of being in his life. Eric I have no idea what has happened to you in life dear, but you seem to dislike women. Without us their would be no population, we have partners and children because we genuinely love them. I have no idea why young men would want to take their lives, but I feel underneath the problem , mental illness would be a big part of the issue

    • Eric says:

      10:22am | 23/04/10

      OldGirl, where do you get the idea that I dislike women? Exactly what was it in my comment that indicated any attitude toward women in general at all?

      I simply pointed out some of the problems faced by men. If you think that merely *mentioning* the fact that men are suffering is somehow an attack on women, I have to wonder about your own attitude.

    • T.Chong says:

      10:33am | 23/04/10

      Sam, if referring to me, than you are wrong.I consider myself a humanist. I believe everyone is equal I dont hate women, or men or any other group. What I do hate is the appalling sexism that binds all women as victims and all males as perpetrators, all men as “haves”,all women as “have nots.”
      The real difference in society is between socio / economic groups.
      “Well off “(economic, education, socio etc) women have far more in common with “well off ” men than they do with their sisters on Struggle street.
      Just as many men do it tough as the women, and in our society, just as many women live the good life as men.
      We live in a class based society. Thats obvios.
      If you really believe in real equality that you must concede that women are as good and as bad as men.

    • thatcherschild says:

      11:26am | 23/04/10

      Why are young men killing themselves so often?
      Well Eric, it has been proven time and time again that approximately one third of all young male suicides are due to sexuality issues, you know, scared young men who darent come out due to being “continually denigrated in the media, during education etc”, or the other words you trotted out “social discrimination and villification”.
      So Im just wondering if you consider these guys worthy of your protests, or just the ones killing themselves cos of the feminists.

    • OldGirl says:

      11:56am | 23/04/10

      Sorry Eric I guess I got the wrong end of the stick, happens from time to time love, I am not perfect by any means

    • Eric says:

      12:20pm | 23/04/10

      @thatcherschild, I’ll take your statistics on face value, for arguments’ sake.

      Yes, of course I consider that young gay men who kill themselves because of discrimination against homosexuality deserve to be recognised and helped. Everyone who is unfairly vilified deserves that.

      @OldGirl, I am far from perfect myself, so don’t fret yourself over that. Sometimes I do get a bit angry - but my beef is not with women, but with political activists, both male and female.

      I love women, I have had no bad relationships and some good ones. I have been treated fairly by female bosses in some jobs I have held.

      I am criticising social assumptions, political policies, and particular people. I include many men among those I attack.

      My arguments are about attitudes, not identities.

      Thanks for your understanding.

    • Craig Lambie says:

      08:35am | 23/04/10

      Well said, I couldn’t agree more.

      Everything is linked.  The fact that some people commute for 1 hour or more a day instead of walking or cycling to work is due to bad choices, often forced on them by Housing affordability and/or societal pressures.

      I am happy the Fed’s are taking responsibility for Health, but Mental health and all the things that are linked to that is a very important element to physical health, and preventative measures!

    • Sahara says:

      09:40am | 23/04/10

      “pricing fresh food beyond the means of their limited disposable income and instead allowing cheap fast-food outlets to proliferate in low SES communities”

      This is an urban myth. Last night I cooked a meal of fresh chicken, potatoes, Fresh corn on the cob as well as some fresh leeks which fed three adults for under $10.

      If I go to a certain well known chicken based fast food outlet by myself I spend more than that. In fact I find fast food to be incredibly expensive which is how they pay for those big buildings, the computer systems, the fancy and expensive cooking equipment and all those staff.

      To say that cooking your own fresh food is more expensive than buying take-away is ridiculous beyond belief.

      The abundance of fast food outlets in the poorer areas has nothing to do with cost and everything to do with indolence and stupidity which has a lot to do with why they’re poor in the first place

    • John A Neve says:

      09:54am | 23/04/10

      Sahara,
      You are spot on, “fast food” isn’t cheap food, it’s lazy food. If you are prepared to shop and cook for yourself, you can eat well for less.

      Australia is still one of the best and cheapest countries for food. Any one who tells you other wise has never been overseas.

    • Bitten says:

      12:29pm | 23/04/10

      I agree with the ‘myth’ that fresh good food is expensive. We cook a huge pot of minestrone with fresh veges and a little bit of pasta and that with a slice of bread each feeds 4 of us for two nights. It’s about $15 for all the ingredients, works out to about $1.90 per person per night. There isn’t a fast food outlet in town that could match that for value, not to mention the healthy nutrition we get from it. I suppose though people have an excuse for everything and the next thing anyone would say would be ‘Well, most people don’t know how to cook.’

    • TracyS says:

      01:29pm | 23/04/10

      Sahara, you are absolutely right.

      Cooking and eating at home is healthier than takeaway. Not only are the meals nutritionally healthier, studies have shown that children in families that sit and eat at least one of their daily meals as a family (around a table, not in front of the TV) do better psychologically and socially.

      And it is significantly cheaper than the empty calorie, high oil, high salt takeaway foods that are being spruiked these days.

    • Robert Smissen of God's Own Country, Rural SA says:

      12:20am | 25/04/10

      It isn’t just junk food that makes people (especially the poor) fat, it is also what they eat at home. Professor Sir C. Stanton-Hicks gathered data for Australia’s then government in the early 30s. Once a family goes past 2 kids & the budget doesn’t stretch, we buy bulk up foods, rice, potatoes, bread & pasta & cut back on the protein deliverers like meat & fish. We know what the problem is but nobody want to do anything about it. It is so much easier to blame the poor for being poor.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @jackaargh: @farrm51 @murpharoo Is the plural of humdrum hadra?

tory_maguire

Why didn't he cop a contempt charge? http://t.co/kO9wqscaQH

ToryShepherd

@anderson_lainie He he. And congrats to Max!

ToryShepherd

@VictoriaPurman Then you should have included sex toys and yoga ;-)

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter