-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Watch it, sunshine
1010
Winston Churchill once said that there are two things in life that are guaranteed, death and taxes.
A strong, healthy marriage unfortunately didn’t make the cut.
And this is why I believe wholeheartedly in pre-nups.
Bad divorces can happen to good people and pre-nups act as a financial safety net.
Kanye West may have forgotten his table manners at the MTV Video Music Awards but he’s right about one thing.
People who refuse to sign pre-nups are gold diggers, pure and simple.
Pre-nups are a colloquial term for what is now legally known as a binding/financial agreement in Australia and contrary to popular belief; the agreement can be made before, during and after marriage.
There are similar contracts for de-facto couples and same sex couples. For argument’s sake, let’s just call them pre-nups.
While normally reserved for the rich and famous, pre-nups are on the rise in Australia and being drawn up for baby boomers, young professionals and people heading into their second marriage who have acquired a lot of assets and may need to support children from a previous marriage.
When it comes to protecting our emotional and physical well-being, we seemingly have no problem doing Google searches, stalking Facebook accounts and asking for STD tests but discussing pre-nups is a stigma and financial hurdle we can’t seem to get over.
Money is the number one reason why marriages end in divorce and yet more couples are likely to discuss their sexual history than their financial one.
Asking someone to sign a pre-nup is a good way to find out about their attitudes to money and to stop ignoring the elephant in the room.
Marriage is a spiritual union but it’s also a financial one.
A pre-nup is simply insurance in case your marriage breaks down.
You don’t take out home insurance thinking your house will ever burn down or wanting it to burn down but in the likelihood it happens, you will be covered.
It’s also about protecting your partner’s assets and reassuring them you’re not just after them for their money and if you’re the more asset rich of the partnership, it’s about preparing for your partner’s future in a way that’s fair and equitable in the case of a break-up.
If you’re a starter wife or husband who supported your partner through business school or a stay at home parent who gave up their chance to earn money and acquire assets to look after a spouse and family, then you shouldn’t be left high and dry if your spouse wants to trade up (or trade down in my opinion).
You can’t put a price on love but you can certainly put a price on the cost of a mortgage, bringing up children and general living expenses.
It’s much better to hammer out the financials when everything is amicable than deciding who is going to have the family pet and wrestling over the heirlooms when bitterness and resentment has set in.
And call me new fashioned but I don’t believe all your financial security should ever lie in the hands of your partner.
They say you should never put all your eggs in one basket and I certainly don’t want to be left penniless or paying off someone’s debt if the chicken flies the coop. And on that financial note, I believe a husband and wife should have separate bank accounts.
However, this is the only time in a marriage where something on the side is encouraged unless you’re dining out.
Now I know what you’re going to say, that there is no ‘I’ in team but there is an ‘I’ in marriage, matrimony, alimony and divorce. I can rely on myself to be faithful, to act with integrity and honour my marriage vows but I can’t control what someone else will do.
Everyone starts out wanting the fairytale marriage but when one in three marriages end in divorce in Australia, statistics tell a different story.
And just remember too that the financial tables may turn and you might find yourself in the 4-inch shoes of Jessica Simpson who didn’t have a pre-nuptial agreement in place when she married Nick Lachey. At the time of their marriage, he was part of a successful boy band and the richer of the two.
However, Lachey’s solo career wasn’t as lucrative and at the time of their divorce, Simpson was the breadwinner and under California law, he was entitled to half of her assets.
With a good lawyer, she managed to get him down to less than half of her earnings, putting the dumb blonde theory to rest.
Jessica Simpson suffered the same fate as famous couples: Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, Madonna and Guy Ritchie and Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy who did not have a pre-nup agreement in place.
Let’s just hope the Great White Shark now separated from his second wife Chris Evert was bitten and twice shy from his first marriage and learnt from his mistake. And as for Kate Gosselin ... shudder!
A marriage is for better and for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health but in the worst case scenario and it’s ‘till debt do us apart and I’m left holding the baby, then I want all my paperwork in place.
And if your spouse is screwing you over, then at least let it only happen in the bedroom and not the boardroom.
Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Julia’s triumphant return: The story in photographs
Instead of a conventional piece of writing about today’s triumphant ALP Caucus meeting, we thought…
Gillard’s big cabinet headaches
Despite it being the dawn of the Sunshine Parliament, Julia Gillard is going to have to make some decisions…
Little rubber band gives my journalism extra balance
Great news! This article is 73 per cent more coherent than anything ever written on this website, and…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: The deliverance of cash to those who squeal loudest
Michael says:
Abbott nailed it in his election launch when he said that for labor, this election was not about Australia, but about labor & their lust for power. They would do - and did give - anything for power. labor have sold out the people of Australia for the interests of a few simpleton ego maniac independents.… [read more]From: Little rubber band gives my journalism extra balance
Adam Diver says:
I have tested it and it worked for me. How it works is beyond me, but then again I have no idea how physical products such as silicon process information, does not mean this computer doesn't work. The thing is I am a skeptical person and I noticed a massive difference when I tested it, and my skepticism… [read more]Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
RT @MrTimms: Thats a keeper. @Matt_Gagger: @QuadeCooper Might have to call @kurtley_beale'Gilbert', considering it's probably still on his forehead
Awesome mashup of Wallaby win v SA http://bit.ly/cGD1aH More of the same please from @QuadeCooper@kurtleybeale& the crew on Sat #rugby
Funny piece on those Power Balance bands http://bit.ly/dcZlkZ by irrepressible sports funk writer @antsharwood (go on, follow him)
Julia's triumphant return: the story in photographs. Our new piece on the punch #auspollhttp://tinyurl.com/34tn496
Gentle jabs to the ribs
Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover
Warning: this has nothing to do with politics. We thought we’d see how the Prime Minister and Opposition… Read more
Most commented