A swirly pastel painting that looks like a kid’s crayon drawing has just sold for $120 million at a Sotheby’s auction in New York. It is the most expensive artwork ever sold.

A Labor voter ponders their options

The buyer is unknown, but the likely purchaser of Norwegian symbolist Edvard Munch’s The Scream, at least according to the Los Angeles Times, is one of the world’s 1200 billionaires. The LA Times goes on to suggest somewhat tantalisingly that the buyer could be a criminal.

The yarn revealed that the painting was shopped around the world, so collectors could see if it went nicely alongside their other artworks, doomsday devices and assorted accoutrements on the interior walls of their heavily-guarded compounds.

Munch actually painted four Screams, but the other three are held by museums. Expectations were around the $80 million mark today but up to seven bidders forced the price up to record heights.

The previous high for an artwork was Picasso’s “Nude, Green Leaves and Bust”, which sold for $106.5 million two years ago.

Australia’s Alan Bond is high on the list. He bought Van Gogh’s Irises in 1987 for $54 million before he sold it back to Kerry Packer for 20 cents. Wait, that was Channel Nine, wasn’t it. Anyway.

The Australian government bought Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles for US $2 million in 1973, and it’s probably the best thing Gough Whitlam ever did. Aside from the fact the abstract masterpiece is now thought to be worth as much as $50 million, it is actually one heck of an awesome thing to behold.

Here at The Punch, we’d love to know if you think buying The Scream was $120 million well spent. How would you spend a lazy $120 mill if you had it lying around?

We’re just as keen to hear whether you like the painting. Inspired by a particularly blood red Norwegian sunset, Munch painted the thing in 1895 as a study in the agony of existence, or the futility of the human condition or some such uplifting theme.

The painting has certainly inspired others. When The Simpsons, Andy Warhol and even the animal cartoonist guy Gary Larson pay homage to you, you know you’ve made it.

Personally, the thing gives me the willies. Donald Trump bought a plane with gold seat belt buckles and suede ceilings last year for $100 million. I’d take that any day.

Most commented

61 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Inky says:

      02:44pm | 03/05/12

      I couldn’t even begin to imagine what I’d do with $120mil, probably buy an apartment somewhere so I’m not renting anymore.

      That’d be most of the money gone thesedays, right? (do hoh hoh)

      Beyond that, I dunno, maybe invest in some start up businesses. Find some good ideas that need funding and see if they can get off the ground. If it takes off, fantastic and if not, well, easy come easy go, it’s not like I worked hard for this hypothetical $120mil.

    • HappyCynic says:

      03:48pm | 03/05/12

      Ugh I know it’s your choice and everything but that all sounds a bit pedestrian, boring and terribly average does it not?  Where’s the idea for resurrecting the dinosaurs so you can set an army of T-Rexs and velociraptors loose in the Canberra to clean the place up a bit?

      You could hold bets online to recoup some costs (the ratings alone would spank Masterchef and the Voice like the little b*tches they are), have odds on who runs the farthest and fastest before being munched, you could test which dinosaur’s digestive tract is most suited to eating politicians, if there’s a difference between chewing on journos and/or pollies, which ones keel over die from indigestion from chewing on all that leathery blubber etc.  smile

      You may not like art or anything but some ridiculous vices are required if you’re rich whether it’s mad science (muhaha), guns, babes and booze or aliens and the CIA taking over your mining ops or whatever… you aren’t truly rich until you’re nuts smile

    • Inky says:

      04:27pm | 03/05/12

      The biggest problem I see with your proposed idea is that the dinosaurs will inevitably turn on their creator. It’s pretty much an established fact and I prefer myself undigested.

      “Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!”

    • Bear says:

      02:56pm | 03/05/12

      The said tantalisingly it ‘might be a criminal’. and? They’re a billioinaire right!? It’s odds on regardless..

    • Knemon says:

      02:58pm | 03/05/12

      “pastel painting that looks like a kid’s crayon drawing” - Tad unfair Ant, even ignorant perhaps!

      Personally, I love the painting, to admire these paintings they are best seen ‘in the flesh’ (so to speak), but in saying that, if I had 120 million to spend, I certainly wouldn’t buy artwork…I would prefer to spend it on women and booze.

      BTW - Great headline Ant grin

    • Inky says:

      03:09pm | 03/05/12

      @Knemon

      Ant is many things, but I don’t think he’s ever suggested to be the sophisticated sort.

      Did laugh at the headline myself though. Still sorta chuckling along about it.

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      03:24pm | 03/05/12

      yeah I saw Van Gogh’s Starry NIght in Canberra 2 years ago and It was amazing to see.  Your eyes were drawn to it as soon as you walked in the room. It just jumped out from the other paintings.

      Same as sitting in the Sistine Chapel and seeing Michaelangelo’s work.  Simply breath taking, pictures don’t do it justice

      Definitely have to be seen “in the “flesh.

    • Bev says:

      03:57pm | 03/05/12

      Pastels are a difficult medium to work with and much of the texture comes from the special texured paper used.  I don’t think I wouldlike that much money.  We see people who win large amounts on Lotto and it brings nothing but misery for many of them.

    • Simon says:

      03:03pm | 03/05/12

      I just had to laugh at the title of this thread.

      Appropriate I think smile

    • SteveKAG says:

      09:39pm | 03/05/12

      it brought me in to read it but then realised what the story was about and went straight to the comments however i agree it is a fair description!

    • John says:

      03:07pm | 03/05/12

      Pathetic headline Mr Sharwood

    • daf says:

      03:29pm | 03/05/12

      ... au contraire John - you’ve absolutely NAILED it this time Ant !!!

    • nihonin says:

      03:33pm | 03/05/12

      It only hurts if you’re a ‘believer’.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      04:53pm | 03/05/12

      While funny its one of those things you shouldn’t say.

      I agree with the sentiments behind the headline, but your going to have a hard time saying you are a fair an impartial organisation after you ok a headline like that.

      For example - I think Collingwood Football Club getting numerous home games is a cancer killing the AFL.

      But I would keep that to myself if I was due to commentate on a West Coast v Collingwood game.

    • Northern Steve says:

      07:48pm | 03/05/12

      I thought it was politically incorrect to pick on disenfranchised minority groups, like the ALP.

    • Muggles says:

      08:09pm | 03/05/12

      The headline does presume a sense of humour in the reader.

    • daf says:

      08:54am | 04/05/12

      @ @ Northern Steve - you’re absolutely correct mate - even a Tarago has one more seat ...

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      11:50am | 04/05/12

      Agreed Joh - but offensive as well.

    • Paul C says:

      01:04pm | 04/05/12

      It must be terrible being John - All evidence suggests that the Gillard government is incompetent and finished, but he just can’t help himself and can’t become a non-believer under any circumstance.  A very hard existence, I pity him.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      03:12pm | 03/05/12

      The Billionaire/Criminal (with blood funnels and all that, is there a line between them anymore?) Who bought this probably did so as a way to express their cathartic guilt after reading Stephen King’s article today.

    • fml says:

      03:19pm | 03/05/12

      Anthony,

      I found a rock the other day, its pretty neat, want to buy it? I will even glue on some suede eyes.

      $120 million o.n.o.

      Good value really, will be worth double that soon.

    • nihonin says:

      03:37pm | 03/05/12

      I had a pet rock, but it died.

    • TimB says:

      05:51pm | 03/05/12

      My rock keeps tigers away. I can prove it too. When was the last time you heard of a tiger prowling through western Sydney?

      The bidding starts at $5. Alternatively will trade for a rock that repels politicians.

    • Anniebello says:

      09:57am | 04/05/12

      @ TimB. I have a rock that repels pollies (and feral cats and other undesireables in the backyard). Picked it up on the side of the road last time I was out walking the dogs. Trade you, although the last tiger I saw in my town was sleeping behind a barrier. smile

    • Chris says:

      03:24pm | 03/05/12

      If I had $120 million I would spend it all on two things:
      1) Buy Collingwood and then shut it down
      2) Create some kind of parallel universe, sneak in and move Acotrel into it while sleeping one night, and then let them blog away in some ALP friendly zone, happy as larry but not disturbing our world.

    • Bomb78 says:

      04:55pm | 03/05/12

      Chris: these were #1 and #2 on my list too - although I had them the ther way around.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      03:27pm | 03/05/12

      Try to keep as much of it and the subsequent proceeds out of the hands of The Lying Redhead and her henchman as possible. When I want my money spent on puppet workshops for alleged refugees and left-handed, whale-watching, tree-hugging lesbian parents without partners and other such worthwhile recipients, I’ll be ready for laying out.

      I’d rather drive around the city throwing $50 notes at homeless Australians than give it to Gillard to waste.

    • Tim K says:

      03:58pm | 03/05/12

      Man, shut up. You do yourself no favours by talking.

    • Economist says:

      04:25pm | 03/05/12

      Well that’s not hard. Put it in a bank. Even if you only got 5% return, you’d earn $6 million which at most Gillard would get $2.7m. So don’t stress I think you’ll get to keep it (if only I could type this in sarcastica (ArjB))

    • HappyCynic says:

      03:31pm | 03/05/12

      I’d buy this painting if I had a spare $120 million just lying around collecting dust.  I think it’s worth every cent and more, but I wouldn’t keep it to myself, rather I’d lend it indefinitely to a public gallery somewhere so everyone can see it because fine art, like fine scotch, should be shared.

      Interesting fact: (or not depending on your POV) I’ve heard it was painted shortly after Krakatoa blew and the ash from the explosion suspended in the upper atmosphere is what caused the spectacular sunset, people in Europe hadn’t yet heard what had happened (no 24 hour news cycle yet), and being quite superstitious still, were panicking about omens and other bullsh*t which in turn is the inspiration for the subject of the painting.

    • S.L says:

      03:33pm | 03/05/12

      It’s only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.

    • daf says:

      03:59pm | 03/05/12

      ... that makes it worth ... errr ... $120M - doesn’t it ??

    • HappyG says:

      03:38pm | 03/05/12

      I’d buy an English Premier League team and then file for bankruptcy in a fortnight.

    • Darren says:

      03:44pm | 03/05/12

      $120m = super yacht with all the trimmings.

    • Al says:

      04:04pm | 03/05/12

      I could a afford a TV from a Harvey Norman store, or Ralf Lauren jeans from David Jones.

    • Paul C says:

      01:13pm | 04/05/12

      You could even get one of those 3D TVS that Harvey Norman heavily promoted - If only something was actually broadcast in 3D.

    • Rosie says:

      04:06pm | 03/05/12

      I bet if Anthony wasn’t being funny and the painting was a representative of how the people have responded to the Gillard Labor Govt, Clive Palmer wouldn’t hesitate to purchase it and donate it to some museum preferable the one in Canberra as a reminder to all future Govts! “This is the reaction you will receive from the people when you do not try to be just a good govt but govern only to beat the opposition.

      That is my take on the painting and my gut instinct if I had the money would definitely buy it as an investment. The Gillard Labor Govt is unique, there will never be another one like it!

      By the way, good work Anthony to link the painting to Gillard Labor and what most of us are having to endure.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      07:41pm | 03/05/12

      Must be a bit like doing your make-up Rosie.

    • Punters Pal says:

      04:06pm | 03/05/12

      I would go down to the Star and put it all on the black. That’ll teach them.

    • M says:

      04:14pm | 03/05/12

      I’d move to the slums of Monaco.

    • Merchant Banker says:

      04:14pm | 03/05/12

      Looks like one of the conservative faithful after Abbott loses the next election.

    • Shane* says:

      04:31pm | 03/05/12

      The most expensive artwork ever sold?

      Earlier this year a version of The Card Players by Paul Cezanne (one of five paintings in a series) sold for 160 million pounds, or around USD$240million.

      The Mona Lisa has been valued for insurance purposes at $700million. The Louvre don’t insure it… they just spend a tiny percentage of that amount on security.

    • Kika says:

      04:46pm | 03/05/12

      I’ve been to Norway. The painting makes sense.

    • Disco Stu says:

      05:05pm | 03/05/12

      Meaning? You did not like Norway? Are you insane!? I guess you weren’t there for the babes huh?

    • M says:

      12:45pm | 04/05/12

      Kika is a chick, so probably not.

    • Ian1 says:

      04:52pm | 03/05/12

      Funny.

      I do wonder whether the proceeds from the sale could match Australia’s current interest bill on it’s debt repayments.

    • Anubis says:

      10:24am | 04/05/12

      It would cover a single days borrowings of this ridiculous Government

    • SD says:

      05:04pm | 03/05/12

      “A Labor voter ponders their options”. haw haw haw, i split my sides, so funny. Everything comes back labor doesn’t it!? That being so, I think you people are the ones with the problem!

    • long live labor says:

      05:23pm | 03/05/12

      the man with the headache in the painting will be topny abbott if he loses the nexty federal election.

    • long live labor says:

      05:25pm | 03/05/12

      Labor will be the Federal Government from November 24 2007 to november 2081 ! Labor will give the media and the Liberal National Party millions of headaches until 2082!

    • Don Paul says:

      06:06pm | 03/05/12

      Are you taking the piss sir?

    • Richard says:

      05:56pm | 03/05/12

      I think its fabulous. Probably my favourite piece of iconic artwork. I never did understand what all the fuss about the Mona Lisa was, but the archetypal impact of this image can really speak to me. So I were a billionaire, for sure: I’d buy this painting in a heartbeat (if I had the chance).

    • Muggles says:

      08:08pm | 03/05/12

      Excellent title.

      Agreed on the meritlessness of Mona Lisa.

    • stephen says:

      08:28pm | 03/05/12

      Yeah I agree, Gough’s best act was buying Blue Poles.
      I’ve seen this picture and it is magnificent.

      ‘The Scream’ would have made a better photograph.
      The painting expresses an idea that, at the time it was painted, was best expressed through Literature and especially Music, and Photography, at this time, (and before it could stand on its own as a thorough form or Art) conceptualized emotional states, visually (in fact it only really headlined Freud’s best ideas) better than oils or pastels.

      It’s not a bad painting, but there’s too many of them, and concepts after one turn into narrative, and one figure who looks like they’ve burnt the scones does not a Poem make.

    • Tyson Po says:

      10:05pm | 03/05/12

      Yeah, exactly. Maybe it would have been better as a 3-part documentary broadcast over consecutive nights.

      Eddie made his painting for himself, not for Tafe-edukated tossers like you.

    • stephen says:

      10:50pm | 04/05/12

      No-one makes paintings for them self.
      Not Music, not Poems, not even Pasta.

      Mr. Munch was too much a spreader of news to be a silent progenitor of theory, (and this painting set off too much interest of a mind kind at the expense of colour and form. It’s not a good painting.)

      It made money for Sothebys because of the interest it spread when it was first exhibited ... and we all like a fictional figure to suffer what we do ... or at least, we want an artist to be at least sympathetic to what we, the art buyers and lookers of the world, should feel and look if we want to be truly tragic.
      Actually, the painting is not that bad, but the sentiment there is like a dot on the sun : after a while, it’s gone, and we can smile again, and all that pain is part of the sun, itself.

    • Chonko says:

      10:07pm | 03/05/12

      $120m? they could have got it off the internet for well under $100m,  but at least we know now the screamer is screaming “HOW MUCH?”.  That aside, artistic value is now the dollar value,  famous artistic pieces are just an asset class and a trip around a gallery just a perverse version of “the price is right”.  May be all artists are really hoping to achieve is just a very high price and the meaning, message and emotion is just phoney sales boll0cks .

    • Le Postmoderne says:

      11:50pm | 03/05/12

      Fish gotta swim, shark’s gotta eat. Starving artists don’t actually want to starve.

    • Sam says:

      11:42pm | 03/05/12

      I just printed out an A3. Cost about 70 cents.

    • Brutus Balan says:

      10:16am | 04/05/12

      That is exactly what it is, “A swirly pastel painting that looks like a kid’s crayon drawing…:”  I love art but no art particularly this one seen in pictures or in the flesh is worth this obscene price.  To those who consider themselves as some sort of superior art lovers here are like the ones admiring the exquisite invisible robe of the Emperor who walked naked admiring himself.  Ignorant fools patting themselves to their aesthetic prowess. The one who bought this is a fool with lots of money to spare and I hope moths eat this painting out of existence.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      11:56am | 04/05/12

      If I had a “lazy” 120 million dollars it would hardly matter what I spent it on.
      However as a retiree who came into $120 million I’d probably take a couple of million just to see me through, give my kids a wad of it and give a substantial amount to selected charities. No one person needs that obscene amount of “lazy” money while there are children dying from preventable disease and hunger every second of the day.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

Best print journo to @mcguiremi woot! #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter