Update: Lleyton lost, again.

Excuse the disturbing imagery, but imagine for a moment Lleyton Hewitt as a burlesque dancer.

Lletyon and Marcos share a moment. Photo Andrew Tauber


Imagine Lleyton as one of those Dita Von Teese types that have lead a popular resurgence for the art in recent years. Emerging out of a large bowl and dressed in emu feathers, Hewitt begins the Australian Open by holding an expectant crowd’s attention with his potential to nude-up with a win.

But year after year the tease is interrupted by a stern order from backstage and Lleyton goes running off, leaving the crowd to go home frustrated and merely fantasize at the potential of what we might have been treated to. 

Like a good burlesque dancer, this trance continues to work for Lleyton because he’s never going to be completely crap. He always shows enough promise prior to the tournament and in its early rounds, but goes on to get knocked out by a 12-year-old Serbian or Spanish Matador called Jose.

The fact that tonight he is playing Roger Federer is no surprise because it’s classic Hewitt to play with our emotions like this. In his forfeit win over Marcos Baghdatis Hewitt looked on fire, and has appeared so the entire tournament.

But now he’s stuck facing Roger Federer. He hasn’t beaten this guy in 14 straight matches and hasn’t looked like doing so. Granted he took a set of the Swiss great when they met in the US Open last year, but one set is a long way off three with Federer.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love Lleyton to beat Mr Perfect.

Unlike the top players running around today, there’s no particularly compelling trait to Hewitt’s game other than the guts with which he plays it.

Australia has a weird relationship with Lleyton these days. We’re kinda like a nation of mothers who preferred his old girlfriend Kim Clijsters to his current wife:

“Yes that Bec Cartwright is fine, but why did you stop going out with that lovely Dutch girl? We all liked her.”

But besides secretly disliking his wife, we largely respect the way our son has coped with the way history has consigned him to be a good, but not great player, when compared to the rise of Federer and Nadal.

That’s why we’ll all turn up or tune in to watch Lleyton Hewitt tonight in the vain hope that maybe this year he’ll go the Full Monty at the Australian Open just once.

******

Actually Mr Tiley, Tomic was right

Besides the petulant nature of Bernard Tomic’s post-match tantrum on Thursday morning, the predictable scorn being poured on the 17-year-old ignores the fact that he’s right about late finishes.

What other sport does expect its athletes to be performing at 2 am during one of its marquee events? And, perhaps more importantly, what fan wants to see that?

Australians are regularly getting up at bizarre hours to watch sport being played in Europe, America or South Africa, and given the Australian Open is one of the rare occasions where we host the world would it be too much to ask that we don’t have up to 2 or 4:34 am (as was the case in 2008) watching a match?

Australian Open director Craig Tiley’s reply to Tomic was that he would be given an “education on how scheduling works. You’re playing a grand slam event, a global event, and while it’s nice to always get exactly what you want, it’s not always possible. But on the other hand, feel privileged that you were on Rod Laver Arena playing in front of an excited crowd and having that many people watching you play.”

Perhaps somebody could educate Craig Tiley that at 2 or 4 am there is not a stadium full of fans at Melbourne Park or anyone much watching it on television (except in Europe and America of course).

Maybe they could also educate Mr Tiley that despite his “this is just the way it goes son” line, as the only other Grand Slam to have night games the US Open doesn’t seem to have the same level of problems with late finishes (there was a one-off under the roof night match during Wimbledon last year as well).

The record late finish there was 2.26 am back in 1993 and last year a minor controversy at the US Open was that fact that Andy Roddick’s first round match finished at 12:45 am.

Whatever the reason for Aussie Open finishes I did like the Tomic’s honest reply to reporters who were expecting him to admit what a bad boy he’d been:

“What’s there to learn? I just finished the match and I said a thing … what was I supposed to say? It was two o’clock in the morning.”

From the mouths of babes.

I'm tired, so tired

 

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Retired Soldier says:

      07:33am | 25/01/10

      You say there are not many people watching the game at 2 am except the USA and Europe. Have you considered the number of Australians who actually watch this bunch of whining petulant spoilt brats. Not many in the scheme of things i would think. The fact that the other countries have greater populations who want to watch this self centred and overpaid mob of ball hitters probably means more to the TV industry than the hand full of Australians. It’s all about the almighty dollar and it won’t come from little ole Australia. As for Master Atomic, he had better get used to doing what he is told before he is spending all his time training young a kids to be wannabe whingers like the rest of them.

    • Darren says:

      08:14am | 25/01/10

      In WA it would have only been 11pm - so lots of people may have been watching

    • Martin G says:

      03:02pm | 25/01/10

      No guarantees they are getting it live. In SA we are on the receiving end of a half-hour delay for some reason.

      The coverage is also shocking, I hear about Channel 7’s new shows so much I will likely go out of my way NOT to watch them, and viewers generally miss the first point back from an ad break because 7 need to fit one more ad in.

      Leo, wanna write an article about terrible sports coverage on Australian TV these days? 7, 9 and 10 are all as bad as one another.

      Oh and agreed with the Tomic part, but I don’t think Lleyton will have many better chances to beat the Fed than tonight. I think he can pull off a win.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      09:21am | 25/01/10

      I devote my entire two weeks to the Australian Open - unashamedly.  And I’de like to see the critics of tennis see if they can play at the same level as the professionals do - they would soon see how hard it is.  It is a legitimate sport and professionals are entitled to be paid.  I do not accept that they are all petulant spoilt brats at all.  This is a sweeping statement like many that I see on The Punch from time to time on different issues.  Having said all that I do believe that the scheduling needs to be reviewed so that players are not up at 2am in the morning.  Perhaps the officials could look at that during the next 12 months.

    • Retired Soldier says:

      11:07am | 25/01/10

      I agree not all of them are what i stated and for that i will apologize. The sad thing is that many of them are and the worst of all tend to be Australians. As for officials reviewing the late night/early morning games, it really comes back to a larger population wanting to watch when it is convenient to them not what we in this country might like. In the end it is all about dollars to the players and the power brokers of tennis. By the way , how do you manage to “devote” an entire two weeks to watching this sometimes interesting game and do you want them to change the timings for the players or for yourself ? Getting a bit tired by 2 AM are we ?

    • Stan Wills says:

      10:32am | 25/01/10

      The tennis has been fun .....except for the idiotic cries and pointing to his empty head by Lleyton ..Why can’t we put some dignity and sportsmanship back into sport ? We cringe every time when our cricket team carries on like pommie footballers when they bowl out some tailender with a bouncer   Nothing like some quiet dignity when excelling in sport

    • A country member says:

      10:48pm | 25/01/10

      Bless you Stan,

    • Leo Shanahan says:

      10:37am | 25/01/10

      Hi Julie,
      I agree, tennis is, among other things, a really mentally tough sport. Not sure if you watched that Roddick v Gonzalez match last night but it was amazing to watch the Chilean crumble under what was purely psychological pressure, even though he could put Roddick away. Still I’m not sure how many other people were watching it when it ended.

    • Mike says:

      10:39am | 25/01/10

      Thanks for coming out in support of Bernard - even if guardedly. But I thought I’d raise a point about the global nature of the timing.

      2am in Melbourne is 7am in Los Angeles and 10am in New York (on a work day no less), which means Americans would have had to have woken up in the dark to watch a non-American play. Really, it’s not going to happen. Similarly in Europe. 2am here is between midday and 5pm (depending on where you are), also on a workday.

      The fact is that late night games here in Australia are not prime-time events anywhere in the world, except perhaps for some of the more populous areas in Siberia.

      Craig Tilley is wrong and deep inside he must know it. I guess he just didn’t like being told it by a seventeen year old.

      How about they institute a rule that once it hits midnight, the set that’s being played is to be finished with the remainder of the match to be played first up in the night session the next day? That’s an off the top of my head suggestion which seems to be fair for spectators and both players alike. Surely with the brainpower at the disposal of Australian Tennis they will be able to come up with something even better before next year’s tournament.

    • Little Miss SciFi says:

      02:09pm | 25/01/10

      Mike that is rediculous. you can’t have a game stopping one night and then starting again the next day. That takes all the psychological play out of the game, not to mention the physical endurance aspects.  Tennis is a deeply psychological game - giving someone time to regroup overnight just defeats the purpose of the competition.

    • Grumbles says:

      03:17pm | 25/01/10

      I think a better rule would be no matches starting after 9.30pm then only the long games would drag past midnight.

    • Davo says:

      10:51am | 25/01/10

      “In WA it would have only been 11pm - so lots of people may have been watching”

      You would have thought that, but no. They delay the telecast of the matches three hours over here in the west so that they air (and finish) at the same time as they did over east.

      It means we have to avoid any media that might tell us a result as well as stay up to 2am to see the end of certain matches. It is ridiculous.

      And while it is true that not all players are petulant spoilt brats it is easy to think that when we concentrate on the biggest spoilt brat of them all - Hate ‘n’ Spewitt.

    • MKR says:

      01:32pm | 25/01/10

      You’re right - they do the same in Queensland. So so silly. I end up getting fed up and going online to see the result. Especially when they play a delayed telecast - and include the rain delays in the DELAYED telecast!

    • Adam says:

      01:10am | 27/01/10

      What I want to know is why we can get live coverage for the tennis in the day sessions in Queensland but as soon as 7 goes to the news, Today Tonight and its unneccessary Home and Away (couldn’t they wait another week? Viewers have had all summer) we’re on the delayed feed which in some sort of convoluted sense meant to work in with our schedules.

    • smclennan@lycos.com says:

      11:39am | 25/01/10

      Love him or hate him, Hewitt’s fighting qualities are undeniable.  After a cushy win against Baghdatis, Hewitt will be primed for this.  He isn’t the player he once was, but Federer probably isn’t either.  The $6.50 on offer about Hewitt looks like value to me.  He can win

    • Budz says:

      12:33pm | 25/01/10

      I think the $6.50 is a rip off! I reckon it should be closer to $11. Baghdatis clearly wasn’t any where near his peak after playing a massive 5 setter a couple of days before and being injured too. Fed will luckily put Hewitt back in his place.

    • H of SA says:

      01:12pm | 25/01/10

      Budz, this is a little cheeky so I don’t mean to be disrespectful…but when are the bookies not ripping you off? There is a reason its a profitable industry and they don’t exactly give the odds they do to have less money in their pockets.

    • MKR says:

      01:42pm | 25/01/10

      “cushy win” lol

      give me a break - Baghdatis retired due to injury. Hence, he can’t have been playing at his peak. Proven just a couple of weeks ago when he beat Hewitt…

      good luck with the bet - just put on a $1 so you’re not too much out of pocket when he loses.

    • SM says:

      12:45pm | 25/01/10

      @Budz - if you think Hewitt is an $11 chance, then that would make Federer a $1.05 chance. Would you seriously back Federer at that price??

    • Budz says:

      02:12pm | 25/01/10

      Well if I had to put $10 on one of them and Fed was paying $1.05 and Hewitt was paying $11, I would still put it on Fed at $1.05. But that’s just me, and that’s how much confidence I have in Fed over 5 sets.

      But if he wins and plays Davydenko next, I think anything over $2.30 is good value for him.

    • SM says:

      02:15pm | 25/01/10

      @MKR
      what I meant by “cushy” was not having to play a long match late into the night.  Hewitt’s been hampered a little by injury lately and having to play Federer after a gruelling 5 setter would have made it even tougher for him.

      Everyone wants to bag Hewitt but he’s still a very good player. He’s into $5.50 now as a matter of fact.  But good on you for sticking your neck out and declaring the $1.14 favourite a good thing.

    • Paul says:

      06:07pm | 25/01/10

      When they get rid of the peanut commentators like Courier and Alexander I might just tune in for more than 5 minutes. Totally cringe worthy post match interviews aaagghh!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter