Credit card bill hurt?  Rate hikes hitting the mortgage payments?  Tired of endless waits on hold or in your local branch?
CEOs give an up-yours to shareholders, staff and customers. Jon Kudelka in The Australian.

Fret not.  It’s all for a cause. Not yours, of course.  Our big banks.  Why, they’re so grown up, it’s like bonus season on Wall Street.  Makes you proud to be an Aussie.
Sure, wage increases for bank workers hover around 1-2 per cent. Yes, 5000 jobs have been off-shored. True, dividends are down 20 per cent. But spare a thought for Cameron Clyne, CEO of NAB.  He only made $14,246 a day last year.  A pygmy among the seven or eight figure giants - if you don’t include smaller banks like ME.

Yes, it’s annual report season at the banks.  That time to forget about personal data being shipped abroad to follow Australian jobs.  Or taxpayers underwriting banks’ risk.  Or a sales-and-bonus culture tanking the world’s economy.
Take Commonwealth’s Ralph Norris.  His bank admitted its botch-up in getting people into Storm Financial.  That wasn’t just bad.  It was world-class bad.  Well worth $767,500 a month.
Or Gail Kelly, over at Westpac, who earned $10.62 million.
Her executive team clocked raises of 36% in fixed pay.  They offered employees 2%.  That is, to those workers judged lucky come appraisal time.
Back in the day, we’d have to rent an American movie to see that kind of greed.  Now we don’t even have to leave home.
And then there’s Mike Smith of ANZ.
True, he did offer workers a 3.5% raise.  That’s almost as much as inflation.  Well, those workers whose jobs weren’t sent off-shore.
And he did take a $2.02 million pay cut last year. 
But still raked in $10.94 million.  $911,677 a month.  $210,384 a week.  $29,972 a day.  $1,249 an hour. 
We know you want to know.  So we figured it out for you.
Every minute of the last year—at work, at dinner, asleep, on the beach, wherever—Mike Smith earned $20.81.
It makes you all sentimental, really. Our banks, and their CEO salaries, growing up right before our eyes.  All courtesy of us.

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • paulm says:

      04:44pm | 17/11/09

      People will whinge, moan and scream blue murder, and then turn around and keep voting for the labor-liberal duopoly and wonder why nothing ever changes…

    • Biff says:

      05:54pm | 17/11/09

      My bank manager greeted me the other day with a ‘hello, how are you’ but I told him I charged a fee to provide an answer. He scurried off to his office with a strange look on his face.

    • Glen says:

      06:01pm | 17/11/09

      I agree with you Paulm, we shoul vote anything other than labor (including their defactos the greens) or the Liberals.
      The only way they are goig to learn is if we hurt them.  Don’t worry all of you rusted on labor/liberal supporters one of them will get in, they have manipulated the system to ensure they do, but imagine the pain they could feel and the terror of not having it all their own way.  Maybe they could even try somethjing new like representing their constituents.

    • Steve says:

      06:48pm | 17/11/09

      Has nothing to do with politics ........

      the shareholder agree on executive pay however if 10 funds own over 50% of stock in bank A and bank A happens to do all the banking work for those 10 funds then “you scratch my back I scratch yours”......go complain to ASIC or APRA

      it is ludicrious sure - Cameron Clyne looks about as qualified as Rudd for PM or Obama for President but hey, its a new age pal (thanks Michael Douglas Wall Street 1987)

    • Pedro says:

      08:19pm | 17/11/09

      Wow - to do all these calculations you’d need to be a ... banker.

    • Bruce says:

      09:43pm | 17/11/09

      Agree, nobody, bank or otherwise, deserves the pay these people are on. However, governments will never be able to control, and should not get involved in private enterprise remuneration.  Giving shareholders “real” voting power and “real influence” should be part of the acknowledged remuneration process, NOT under “Advisory”.

    • davido says:

      09:52pm | 17/11/09

      Steve I disagree the average shareholder has almost no influence on the board’s pay.

      ASIC and APRA are made up of bankers. Surprise surprise what they will do.

      The banks in this country amount to a form of government authorised taxation.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      10:22pm | 17/11/09

      The solution is astonishingly simple.

      Don’t bank with them.

    • Joe Stephens says:

      10:45pm | 17/11/09

      Oh the joys of capitalism… but what other choice is there? Hopefully Communism becomes cool again and we can get rid of this nanny/PC state.

    • Anthony says:

      11:44pm | 17/11/09

      Uh…communism becoming cool will get RID of a nanny state?? I think I’m missing something here…

    • Andrew Goff says:

      12:02am | 18/11/09

      @Anthony:

      I think Joe Stephens might be a couple of comrades short of a politburo.

    • Paul says:

      04:14am | 18/11/09

      How is it ‘capitalism’ or a ‘nanny state’ in banking, petrol or groceries to run huge state-sponsored monopolies/cartels and send the profits to the elite? I thought that was how feudal and communist systems, and pyramid schemes worked. Put Australia first: Don’t vote for Liberal and Labor corporate muppets.

    • Joe Stephens says:

      07:40am | 18/11/09

      @Anthony: LOL I understand sarcasm doesn’t travel well through text, but at least think before you reply.

    • Shannon says:

      08:19am | 18/11/09

      My problem is not with the CEO salaries, its the hypocrisy of paying themselves that much while the bank profits tumble, workers get measly - if any - pay rises and jobs are sent overseas. If profits were up, workers got the same percentage increases as the CEO and they kept jobs in Australia, I’d say ‘good on ‘em’. But they don’t. Thanks Leon for pointing out the discrepancies - great to see a union boss using the Punch to take the fight to the bosses and not just industrial action.

    • CJ says:

      08:31am | 18/11/09

      When I grow up I want to be a banker.

      Seriously though, what do these guys (and gals) do to earn this kind of dosh?

    • RGG says:

      08:43am | 18/11/09

      How dare people with influence, drive and charisma use their skills and provide services in exchange for money in a capitalist society I am outraged!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • AFR says:

      09:06am | 18/11/09

      Welcome to capitalism.

      The same people complaining of executive salaries, are often the same people who complain we are becomming a “nanny state”. Just make up your mind.

    • Paul says:

      09:45am | 18/11/09

      @rgg @afr No you make up your mind. Are we a nanny state or a suite of uncompetitive cartels advertising ourselves as ‘capitalism’? Expensive delusions fellers.

    • Tim says:

      10:03am | 18/11/09

      I agree with Paul,
      i would hardly call the current banking system a shining beacon of capitalism.

    • AFR says:

      10:16am | 18/11/09

      Where is this “cartel” you speak of? Last I looked there were dozens of options when it came to placing your savings or borrowing money.

      I don’t work for a bank, but just don’t really give a rats about how much someone else is paid - whether it be a bank executive or, say, Tiger Woods, because they did the hard yards and are now reaping the benefits, as are others around them. We choose to Bank with the big four, just like we choose to pay for a ticket to the Australian Masters.

    • Mum and Dad says:

      11:18am | 18/11/09

      I really like how none of the “mum and dad” shareholders bare any responsibility. In 2008 $77 billion was traded on the Australian sharemarket and around $300 million was handed out in “CEO payouts”.
      If everyone took a 1% cut in their “profits” there would be more money saved than by not paying any CEOs anything.
      Don’t get me wrong, these payouts are ridiculous - even if they’re commissions - but so are the totals of shareholder’s profits and their ridiculous expectations that everyone deserves to get rich on the stockmarket.
      I heard a guy in the queue at the Qantas terminal the other day complaining that there was only one person serving customers on the desk. In the next breath he said he should sell his Qantas shares… How about putting the pieces together, morons?

    • Paul says:

      12:56pm | 18/11/09

      @afr where is the competition? Yes we still have some choices but the bulk of the market is still charging what they want, making record profits and jacking up reserve interest rate rises. Does that appear like an actively competing market or a cash cow, like the finger-licking profit monuments of food and fuel cartels?  So afr would you then agree that the ACCC is a tough watchdog?

    • Suzanne Brewster says:

      05:01pm | 19/11/09

      I don’t know how the CEO’s lay straight in bed @ night when their income is equal to gold lotto number 1 division, and our income is just above the poverty line…. If we recieved that sort of income we would retire! Why not reward the ‘workers’ after all without us there would not be any profits. Why is it so hard for the powers at be to go over the inflation mark with wage increases.

    • Jenny says:

      10:28pm | 19/11/09

      I wonder what they do with that amount of money, I mean how can you spend that much? Are they reinvesting it in shares in their own company to again reap more rewards!! As Suzanne said we would retire if that sort of income was received.  There definitely should be more equalising of the profits. The workers are worked harder for little or small reward and their bosses are reaping the benefits. Only benefit to the worker is if they keep their job from going offshore. I wonder what will happen when the existing australian workers burn out in the sweat shop branches and call centres and the Banks cant replace these workers with a skilled workforce that can speak australian and understand products and services to explain processes to customers. Australian branches who need to call India for assistance is a joke when staff were retrenched in Australia who could answer queries with the correct information. Errors and customer dissatisfaction is the fallout from this.

    • Nick Bankworker says:

      12:48pm | 20/11/09

      Yet again the greed of the bank’s CEO’s shines through,while i work unpaid overtime(its viewed as not being part of the team if you don’t stay to finish off things and help fellow workers catch up) i get a subsistance pay raise of 4%.Times are hard we are told and based on the banks performance this is all we get this means i earn the same amount as last year taking into account inflation and therefore not moving forward at all,and yet somehow based on the same bank performance my CEO gets a raise of some 36% how is the possible and why is it allowed to happen ah yes its because the exec boards vote on their bosses pay rise they’re going to give them a good one because they want to keep their cushy jobs as well,my targets go up,i’m expected to do more and more to look after customers needs whilst at the same time serve them quickly so as not to keep them waiting causing them to complain about wait times (they took the customer area clock away so they don’t know how long they’ve been waiting) .In the glc our targets did go up,i receive no ongoing training as a part timer they tell me they can’t send me on them as they’d have to pay me a full day and thats not in the branch budget.My manager then moans we’re not meeting targets but with poor training and a subsistance salary what do they expect as the adage goes ,you pay peanuts ,you get monkey’s

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter