I often get asked what will be the lasting effects of the Global Financial Crisis and the Australian recession on Australian attitudes and behaviours. What will be the lesson to be learnt from all this?

Better than a bonus: turning your back on debt

In many ways, it is early days for Australian consumers. Sure the finance media has been full of bad news for over twelve months.

But up until the end of January we were still finding that consumers were taking a cautiously optimistic approach to the economy.

We’ll have to wait and see how long our economic troubles last before we can predict any lasting changes to the outlook of any generation of Australian.

However the one definite change already happening is in the area of attitudes to debt, particularly credit card debt.

We ran a poll of more than 1000 Australians last week and asked them: “If there was one thing you could change about your current financial situation, what would it be?”

We gave them the following options:

• To be free of all credit card debt

• To reduce the interest rate on my mortgage by 0.5%

• To get a job raise of $10,000

• To have a better performing superannuation

• To be eligible for six months of parental leave

• None of the above

It was no surprise that almost a third (31%) opted to be free of all credit card debt, outstripping by one per cent those who opted for a $10k pay rise.

These numbers square with what we have been finding in our research since December.

More than anything else, Australians are now aware of the traps of credit card debt, particularly at a time when they are anxious about job security and wage restraint.

These poll results give us some insight into the reasons why the Rudd government had taken a popularity hit in recent weeks.

From the point of view of our research, it’s not so much a reflection of people’s dissatisfaction with the budget, rather the almost universal disapproval for the $900 stimulus package approach to jump-starting the economy.

In our qualitative research we have found that while consumers reported having various plans for their bundle of Rudd dollars, they were unanimous in the view that it was bad policy.

The reasoning? More retail spending on ‘stuff’ isn’t going save us from an economic meltdown created by us spending too much on ‘stuff’. 

The government’s stimulus package has been seen by many consumers as the equivalent of melting the credit card on designer shoes.

They haven’t fully grasped onto the concept that spending equals jobs.

Perhaps, they are too focused on cutting back and sitting tight until they see how bad the recession will get.

This is clearly an opportunity for Malcolm Turnbull. Interestingly, while we have found that consumers express views about the stimulus package and deficit akin to Turnbull’s public pronouncements, they haven’t joined the dots. He has been listening to them but they haven’t been listening to him.

But given the recent focus on the deficit, consumers might start tuning in to his message of irresponsible government spending and a debt burden for future generations.

5 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Michael says:

      11:41am | 04/06/09

      Great piece Rebecca, and very interesting findings.

      Can I be the first to predict that Australia will record flat or negative growth in the next quarterly GDP figures?

      I don’t think we’re out of the woods yet.

    • zebadiah81 says:

      01:55pm | 04/06/09

      I’m sorry Rebecca, but the majority of people have no idea about fiscal policy and economic theory, and the GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) principal definitely holds true.

      Most people buy a house with massive loan, paid off over many years, and think that this is a completely reasonable means to an end, but then they express concern when doing the same thing to avoid an economic depression or recession.

      Whether people use the money to free up their credit card debt (thereby reducing interest, and increasing disposable income), or to buy a new TV (or whatever), the injection of capital back into the economy will ultimately reduce the time required to pay it back.

      If the government had ignored the current situation and delivered a budget that did not have a deficit, or a much smaller deficit, the impact on every-day Australians would be much worse than it has been, raising unemployment, increasing welfare payments, leading to future budgets that would require an even larger deficit to counter these effects, with even less tax being collected to repay said deficit, a spiral that would be harder and harder to get out of.

      Malcolm Turnbull (who is actually pretty good at making money) should know better, and his response to the budget was entirely politically motivated, and not in the interest of the future of Australia.  But in times of crisis (and we must all believe that this is one), we don’t need mud-slinging accusations about the words used to describe the deficit, we need bi-partisan support of the tough measures required to deal with the situation.

    • Aaron says:

      11:44pm | 08/06/09

      People chose clearing credit card debts over a $10k pay kick?

      Do people really have either no idea about their personal finance or do they have $50k credit card debts?

    • Feesnundelf says:

      08:16am | 19/01/11

      dAedbneblsp   <a >natwest internet banking</a> TorkSmoneelBaNtt   mJmmamacq <a >cibc online banking</a> esuaeerfarzmas ryerlearegg <a >bmo internet banking</a>  nnaodoooldpdAgedsbeelsp,,  <a >cna training</a>  ceAllsdHaavsedxr GesTwtyybeaulel <a >barclays online banking</a>  eGraLozdal nUenycREdos,  <a >chevy chase bank online</a>  whuklasodkoo

    • stootoFrism says:

      11:18pm | 30/09/11

      mezoehRFeuemn <a >famous footwear coupons</a>  Fepsioftwrrio

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@diversionary#wading

Paul Colgan

Tip for young journos. Have a short CV. A page, two max.

Malcolm Farr

@cjjosh Only communications satellites please (Limited field).

Malcolm Farr

@DarrenFerrari @andrewcatsaras And so he should be. He might be the chap humming in the background to the end of the recording.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter