Today marks the return of Parliament in Canberra, in an election year. For some this will be of no interest, for others it is a captivating period in which the intrigue, dynamics and more subtle nuances are followed each sitting day.

I am firmly of the view that as Australians, we should be very proud of the vigorous nature of our democratic processes.

After all, millions of people throughout the world are prepared to risk their lives in pursuit of democratic principles being introduced to their nation.

Parliament is an opportunity for Governments to promote their ideas and implement their practical plans for the nation. For Oppositions, Parliament provides a forum to hold the Government to account and present alternative policies.

Australia’s democratic process stands up to comparison with any Parliament in the world.

Visiting Leaders, Ministers and Parliamentarians are invariably astonished that the entire Ministry, including the Prime Minster, attends question time every day and take questions which are genuinely without notice.

In the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister only attends Question Time once a week, for half an hour, and questions are placed on the notice paper three days in advance.

In the New Zealand Parliament, questions also appear on the notice paper and supplementary questions must relate directly to these. In the United States of America, there is simply nothing to compare with our House of Representatives Question Time.

In 2009 there were 1187 questions without notice asked during Question Time in the House of Representatives. In addition there were 616 questions on Notice and 9,313 Questions placed on notice through the Senate Estimates process.

For this 42nd Parliament there have been 21 occasions where there were more than 20 questions asked during Question Time in the House. This contrasts with the 41st Parliament, with John Howard as Prime Minister and Tony Abbott as the then Leader of the House, when there were never more than 20 questions asked.

During our first two years, the Rudd Labor Government has delivered 103 Ministerial Statements to the House, compared with 105 statements delivered by the Howard Government over more than 12 years in office.

Labor’s record includes 9 Prime Ministerial Statements on issues such as: Climate Change; Responding to the Global Financial and Economic Crisis; Closing the Gap on Indigenous disadvantage; the economy; relations with India; the actions of North Korea and weapons testing; Iraq; Terrorist attacks in Mumbai; and, World Environment Day.

The Opposition receives an equal amount of time to respond to these statements.

In 2009 the House of Representatives passed 205 pieces of legislation, the most for a decade. The majority of these were carried with unanimous support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

There are 54 Bills which have been passed by the House of Representatives, but not yet dealt with by the Senate.

During this session, legislation debated will include the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, the establishment of a National Broadband Network, creating a framework for National Consumer Law and a National Occupation Health and Safety regime, as well as reforming election funding.

From time to time oppositions will express frustration at the Parliamentary procedures which are in place. It is particularly the case that when Oppositions have nothing to say about issues of substance they will make substantial statements about nothing much, including about process.

This point is proven when in 2009, the current Opposition, even voted against the approval of the Parliamentary Sitting Calendar for 2010.

No amendments proposed, just opposition for oppositions sake. Given that Tony Abbott has pledged this oppositionist approach will characterise his Leadership, I guess we can expect more of this unproductive approach.

For those who doubt the significance of events in the House of Representatives Chamber, they only need to think back to the week beginning 21 June 2009. Malcolm Turnbull’s demise as Opposition leader can be traced to the week in Parliament when his lack of judgement was on full display through his irrational pursuit of the fake email affair.

During that week, Australians paid attention to the events in the Parliament with far greater scrutiny than usual. From that point on, Malcolm Turnbull’s days were numbered.

The challenge for the new Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, is to counter the alienation that many Australians already have from his extreme right-wing views and his aggressive style.

17 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      05:06am | 02/02/10

      Anthony, I refer to your quote
      “Visiting Leaders, Ministers and Parliamentarians are invariably astonished that the entire Ministry, including the Prime Minster, attends question time every day and take questions which are genuinely without notice”.
      What I would love to see is you guys answering a couple of questions this time around. Could you also tell Kev for me that when he stands with his elbow on the dispatch box with his back to the opposition and that smug look of arrogance on his face it turns my stomach. Not that that matters I suppose. My Labor voting wife is very shallow and that is the reason she will not be voting for Krudd again. Turns her stomach too.
      Malcolm Turnbull’s demise come about because he blindly supported Labors great new tax.  Oh and while I’ve got ya, how come as soon as big Tony took the reigns of the Libs, Kev’s voice has changed? Does he have a different persona depending on whom he is talking to? And in regards to the utegate scandal, many of us haven’t forgotten how the media allowed Kevin and Wayne to breeze through that one without asking the hard questions (again).
      Oh well, I’ve got the set warming up, a full esky and nowhere else to be. My vocal chords have had a break so I am ready for Parliament on the tele. Bring it on…

    • Luke says:

      06:47am | 02/02/10

      “The challenge for the new Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, is to counter the alienation that many Australians already have from his extreme right-wing views and his aggressive style”.
      Didn’t you see the polls this miorning Anthony? Nice of you to be giving the Opposition tips. I don’t think he needs them Maybe you should be giving Kevin some tips on how NOT to lose “The Unloseable Election” for you.

    • Bernie McGurgan says:

      11:28am | 02/02/10

      What a lot of garbage by Albanese! Question time is wasted time with Rudd and Coy never answering the question! Besides the fact both sides carry on like ” a pack of school children” at the best of times!
      Perhaps if the speaker took more control and ran question time as it should be run, more Australians would actually watch! I understood he was supposed to be impartial?
      Parlieament is becoming a “stage” wherin all MPs, particularly on the Government side, get up and say how good a job” we are doing!
      It certainly holds true that the Rudd Government “is all talk and NO action” when Albanese sprouts such rubbish!
      As for the PM, his stance, denmenour, arrogance, sneering are there for all to see! Not for much longer I hope!

    • T.Chong says:

      07:24am | 02/02/10

      Wayno, a brave Connedserfative supporter who would want to reviisit ute gate. Exactly what was the relationship between Godwin and the LNP ?
      Someone was doing a bit of compromising, either Good Liberal Gretch,or the LNP ,or both.

    • Gerard Hoyle says:

      08:06am | 02/02/10

      What was the relationship between Swann and the car dealer?

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:11am | 02/02/10

      I should be ashamed of myself comrade!

    • Ken says:

      07:25am | 02/02/10

      Thanks for nothing, Albo. I just wasted five minutes of my life reading that drivel. Typical of Rudd and his cronies, a lot of fluff without really saying anything constructive. Fancy - more people prefer the coalition than Labor - who would have thunk it?

    • Anna says:

      07:54am | 02/02/10

      Would you please tell the Speaker of the House that his position is supposed to be impartial, because until now Harry has been a joke.  The arrogant attitude of the PM (and you are not far behind) is sickening.  I used to love watching Question Time but very soon got sick of it after you lot came in!  I will watch today to see if there is an improvement in the standard of behaviour.  Please just answer the questions instead of a lot of meaningless waffle.

    • fluffy says:

      09:31am | 02/02/10

      worthless if noone asks the right questions… and just because you can ask a question doesnt mean your going to get an answer.

      why did we participate in the illegal invasions of iraq and afghanistan, based on lies. why are we still being told we its to make us safer, when in fact, terrorism has increased and we are now more of a target than ever before? - why do the perpetrators of these war crimes get to walk away without having to answer these questions?  why are our rights and liberties being taken away, because of the false flag of 911.

      i wont hold my breath..  i know how our so called democracy works.. you make a statement on the punch, then ignore all the responses, because you have no answers.

    • ChrisG says:

      10:17am | 02/02/10

      First point: Parliament is not “an opportunity for a Government to promote its ideas” – it is meant to be a body to generate, debate and revise legislation. Our system, in practice, delivers the legislative initiative to the Executive, and your statement betrays an unconscious view of the chamber as a theatre in which the Government of the day orchestrates ideological performance.

      Second point: could you remind us of the occasions you remonstrated with Paul Keating about the damage his ‘style’ had on the process and perceptions of the Parliament?

      Third point: the volume of Ministerial statements does not equate with increased substance and good government. It is just possible that the volume of Rudd Government statements reflects its proclivity for thinking out loud and mistaking pronouncements for achievements. The risk is disappointment from all the voters who mistook the talk for likely action.

      Fourth point: will a Government so committed to generating new laws and so legislative workload proportionately increase the sittings days and resources of the Senate to allow adequate scrutiny?

    • Harquebus says:

      11:16am | 02/02/10

      “vigorous nature of our democratic processes”. What a joke. Parliamentarians represent their parties, not their constituents. Comrade Conjob’s compulsory internet censorship being just one example. 90%+ just do not want it but, which Labor parliamentarian will vote against it?
      Democracy in action? Yeah right.

    • Tom says:

      11:29am | 02/02/10

      Yeah Labor in front by four points 2PP and Kevin Rudd smashing Abbott as preferrred PM…your point?

    • Geoff Brown says:

      11:48am | 02/02/10

      I firmly believe that the re-introduction of the ETS TAX bill in this session will be one of the most significant in Australia’s history.

      As Mr Rudd and Ms Wong keep saying “It’s the science.” If pushed they refer to the IPCC and sometimes the CSIRO. Our CSIRO that suppressed a report that said the ETS TAX was the wrong way to go.

      The IPCC? Well, they showed their true colours in their third Assessment report when they included the fraudulent hockey stick graph. When it was exposed as a fraud, they quietly retired it before AR4. (Penny Wong still uses it.)

      And AR4 is like a house of cards and is gradually being blown away. The IPCC has admitted (I can show you the letter) that they have no proof that Carbon Dioxide causes Anthropogenic Global Warming.

      So why are Mr Albanese’s party pushing ahead with a new TAX based on flawed science? An all encompassing tax that will cost each taxpayer $4550 per annum, add costs to business which will cause some businesses to go bust, some businesses to contract and even more businesses to re-locate off-shore where such an iniquitous tax does not exist. A tax that will cause great unemployment and contract the Australian economy.

    • Richard says:

      10:02pm | 02/02/10

      Some people sound more like American Republicans than Australian.
      Selfish, ignorant and greedy.
      Obsessed with tax.
      You get what you pay for - Americans get bugger all.
      Europeans, Scandinavians pay way more tax, and enjoy a much better standard of living. And less crime!
      Most important, they believe in science and invest in their grand-children’s future.

    • soultrader says:

      12:37pm | 02/02/10

      reading this waffle, drivel and utter self gratification leave me with a wram fuzzy feeling. The problem is the feeling is in my jocks after I have split my sides laughing.
      Is this arrogant government for real??????????

    • granma says:

      12:39pm | 02/02/10

      i notice tones climate policy is that we pay not the polluters.
      now that is not a polular move and he said a great big tax
      it seems he is the one with the big tax

    • mick hubble says:

      03:22pm | 02/02/10

      Start looking for a job mate.your in for a rude shock

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter