TONY Abbott’s bizarre 7.30 Report admission that he sometimes gilds the lily to win arguments led off a pretty dismal week for the Opposition.

Cartoon: The Herald Sun's Mark Knight

But with Labor doing so badly at explaining its case, all is far from lost. Liberal MPs shuddered as their ``honest-to-a-fault’’ leader dropped into confessional mode to surrender his singular advantage over the mealy-mouthed Kevin Rudd. ``My jaw just dropped,’’ said one.

Others were similarly mystified. Instead of explaining his volte face on paid parental leave funded by a new company tax he’d previously sworn against, as a change of mind, he went the other way. The original promise on Melbourne radio had come ``in the heat of verbal battle’’ and was therefore not to be taken literally.

There were always going to be missteps on the slippery path to the 2010 poll but this was gobsmacking.

With the previously unsinkable HMAS K Rudd listing, it defies belief that the ascendant Liberal leader so creatively found a way to take on water himself.

But then picking Tony Abbott as captain would always make for an interesting voyage. The quirky leader once quipped that he was the ideological love-child of John Howard and the right-wing factional warrior, Bronwyn Bishop.

Perhaps he should have studied his papa’s methods more closely because the uber-disciplined Mr Howard never made such an unforced and unnecessary error.

For a politician, words are pretty much the only tool in the box. To admit you willfully misuse them, when people already find it a stretch believing what your saying, seems at best, counter-intuitive. It’s like a used car salesman volunteering just as you go to shake hands: ``Oh, by the way, this heap really chews the juice and is a real bitch to start on cold mornings.’‘

Of course, discussing things that are counter-intuitive automatically brings to mind the Resource Super Profits Tax. What a gift to the Opposition this is. Forget cold mornings, this sucker may never start.

For Labor though, it is difficult to imagine a less convenient pre-election policy proposal than this one. Let’s be frank, the billionaire tycoon Andrew ``Twiggy’’ Forrest, probably digs holes better than he constructs arguments. But even he is doing better than the communicationally challenged Rudd Government at present. Ditto Twiggy’s less colourful equivalents in BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto.

Kevin Rudd’s problems started from the moment he announced this idea because he had not done the political spade-work. Right up until he dropped it like a hot potato, hospital reform was the only game he seemed interested in playing.

Like so many big moments in this year’s policy log-jam, the RSPT came out of the blue effectively shunting previous ``core’’ policy imperatives like health into the background. Two weeks after Kevin Rudd failed to get WA Premier, Colin Barnett over the line on the supposedly ``national’’ hospitals reform package, he was back in the west on a whole new fight. Resources. What happened to health?

The RSPT struck voters as a solution in search of a problem. There was no public clamoring for a bigger slice of the pie - even if it is justified on closer inspection.

Kevin Rudd also misjudged its unveiling by presenting it as a matter of class warfare. Warning of increasing of profits leaving Australia was a dog whistle about robber-baron capitalists, and foreigners to boot, stealing our national resources.

From a Government that has proudly invited foreign investment, it jarred. Besides, evoking `class’, as we’ve seen time and again, is a dog that will no longer hunt. Plenty of ``working’’ people theses days, own shares in superannuation or investment portfolios. They actually like profits.

The argument that the taxpayers’ share of extraordinary profits has actually declined over the past decade is more convincing. But even here, while many ordinary people suspect the big end of town should to pay a bit more, the sudden leap to take 40 per cent of all profits above a 6 per cent return seems harsh.

However, the point the Government really needs to win on is the one it is getting caned on daily: this is the counter-intuitive claim that skimming $9 billion annually off the sector, will actually result in more mining. To `Joe Voter’, this seems absurd. After all, it is the polar opposite of the rationale used to justify the $5 billion tobacco tax grab: higher prices will see fewer people smoking.

Yet there is no deception being attempted here. Treasury’s modelling shows the tax’s preferential treatment of exploration including shared risk on losses, means a likely increase in mineral developments over time. The trouble is, explaining that complex reasoning to voters, let alone inoculating them against credible claims of mine-closures, job losses, regional atrophy, and a flight of capital, is an enormous task.

This is the same government that took overwhelming public support for action on climate change, and a consensus between the major parties, and yet still produced a comprehensive defeat leading to a humiliating backdown.

Everything rides on the outcome of this. With just months to go to the election, a Reuters Poll Trend released this week combined recent Newspoll, Morgan, and Neilsen polls and found the electorate is as near as damn it to evenly divided. Labor, untouchable for most of this term, holds a miserable 1.2 per cent edge - not even enough to secure a majority.

The next few polls will be very interesting. Mr Abbott’s stumbles and the Opposition’s shabby attempts to avoid scrutiny of its budget saving measures could play badly with voters looking for competence. But they may also go unnoticed in the current RSPT noise.

For Kevin Rudd however, there is no hiding. He simply cannot afford to back down after the ETS debacle. And lest he thinks he might, Treasury boss Ken Henry has hemmed him in further demanding there be no change to either its 40 per cent rate or its 6 per cent cut in.

The Government complains that the miners are over-egging the pudding, which is undoubtedly true. The gap between extraction costs and sale prices is so wide in this resource-hungry world that miners are making a killing selling our finite resources. But the miners are winning the argument and they figure they can defeat the tax outright if they get Tony Abbott over the line. As such, they appear in no mood to compromise.

Labor MPs must be wondering which bright spark came up with this idea and thought it smart to float it now.

41 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John A Neve says:

      06:35am | 22/05/10

      Mark,
      Your comments endorse for the most part my own view. The parlous state of our major parties does not speak well of this countries future.

      Surely it is time for the electorate to start looking for some new ideas, either a new party to support or some good independents.

      Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum have both had a good run and both have let the people down. Members on both side spend more time slagging off at their opponents than they do looking after their electorates. Parliament has become a battle ground for smart assed lawyers, out of work teachers and ex union leaders.  To think one of our best PM’s used to be a train driver!!!
      Oh for a PM today that knows what is going on in the real world, away from the airconditioned edifice of parliament house.

      Our pollies need a wake up call, let’s put the majors parties last on the ballot paper and vote 1 for the best of the minor parties or an independnt.

    • Joan says:

      09:56am | 22/05/10

      So you reckon Bob Brown and Stephen Fielding, or any local Tom, Dick or Mary could do a better job at PM- Ha Ha Ha I really can’t stop laughing at that one

    • Anthony says:

      10:05am | 22/05/10

      John we had a perfectly good PM, but the dumb voters dumped him for the clown we now have

    • NeilM says:

      05:54pm | 22/05/10

      Great idea and worth doing something about. Both sides are not doing much.

      Admittedly I do think that Rudd would have gone with the ETS if he had been able to get a deal with what must rank as the most lothesome untrustworthy opposition ever. Admittedly I do think the RSPT is a good move for us as a matter of national interest, rather than just getting elected style policy. Unfortunately the message isn’t getting across well enough (where are the comms guys?).

      Perhaps a parliament of independents is the way to go?

    • acotrel says:

      07:59am | 23/05/10

      Do you mean independents like Stephen Fielding?

    • John A Neve says:

      10:43am | 23/05/10

      Joan & Acotrel,

      You two are the reason we are in a mess. Short term vision, prevents you seeing what our future might hold.

      Steve Fielding & Bob Brown will pass like wind. Hopefully their replacements will be better, but remember, both were elected so what does that say for the voters?

      But again change is not about today, that’s lost, rather change is about improving our future.

    • David says:

      07:41am | 22/05/10

      Where is Rudd lately? Have they admitted him to hospital permanently until after the election?

    • stevie says:

      09:07am | 22/05/10

      Instead of being the Labor Government’s puppet mouthpiece - Dr Henry has made this impossible for Rudd.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      09:07am | 22/05/10

      Labor’s RSPT will haunt it all the way to the ballot box and the spectre of Treasury Head , Ken Henry , will drive the government over the precipice into the dark abyss of defeat. Rudd has placed all of his party’s bets on the Henry horse and it is racing unerringly towards the edge of that same abyss.The P.M. has gambled everthing on one roll of the dice in a last ditch effort to refill the nation’s coffers , designed to put the budget back in to surplus and restore his ” fiscal conservative ” facade.
      The ” Krazy Kev ” image of mad spending has seriously damaged the government’s standing in the polls and it is unlikely that we will ever again see anything remotely like the lunacy practiced by this Prime Minister in our history as a nation.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      01:29pm | 22/05/10

      What about Gough Whitlam, Rex O’Connor and Jim Cairns?  Anybody remember them? ...the Khemlani Affair? the 21/2% letter?..the dodgy gas pipeline across Australia?...No, KRudd is not alone in the lunacy department.

    • watchingwithinterest says:

      09:45am | 22/05/10

      I think labor has decided that it has no chance in WA so it is hanging the state out to dry, hoping that what it looses in WA it will pick up in the east.  They probably forgot they have no policitcal capital left especially in NSW where the NSW Labor Government stumbles from one disaster to another.  Perhaps they should have encouraged the states to increase their royalties in order to obtain a fair return on our resource, oh I forgot that wouldn’t fill Canberra’s coffers so they could waste more billions of dollars

    • Damili says:

      09:06pm | 23/05/10

      It will be interesting to see whether Rudd even retains his own seat in his electorate; or whether Maxine McKew retains hers.

    • Chris says:

      09:49am | 22/05/10

      As someone else commented recently, it was just another bright, shiny idea that looked good at the time. It was pushed through without any warning, consultation or policy work after being mentioned in a report that the government sat on for months. The health “reform” has not been mentioned for about three weeks. One would presume it is still going ahead, but you never know. Now it seems like the much-promised legal action against Japanese whalers may have been secretly ditched. I wonder how much back-tracking there will be on the mining tax before they quietly put it in the too-hard drawer. Is it any wonder that people are crying out for good, effective government?

    • Ben81 says:

      12:51pm | 22/05/10

      Chris “I wonder how much back-tracking there will be on the mining tax before they quietly put it in the too-hard drawer”

      I’d actually be surprised if that happened, even considering their form on other issues.  They just cannot afford to lose that one, their budget depends on it another failure would surely be the last straw, especially getting close to an election.  It’ll be fought to the death. 

      The interesting part will be seeing if the unions keep up their resurrected booga booga workchoices campaign, or latch onto the government’s latest crusade to tax the crap out of an easy target in the name of morality and try to tell us it will protect jobs or something to justify funding the ads.  I’m guessing a bit of both, watch this space.

    • persephone says:

      05:30pm | 22/05/10

      And as others have pointed out, Chris, such statements are a load of hooey.

      It wasn’t pushed through (at present, it’s just a proposal); the mining companies had suggested the idea themselves to Henry and obviously the three months was spent doing the policy work - this package is complex, and the thinking behind it has been described as ‘elegant’.

      As for health reform - exactly what is there to mention? It’s been approved by the States, and the funding for it is in the Budget - so, unless Coalition government is elected and junks it, it’s going ahead.

      And what’s this ‘now it seems’ stuff about whaling? Very soon after his election Rudd said that he wanted to make sure that all diplomatic efforts were exhausted before he looked at others.

      I doubt that there will be any major backdown on the mining tax. The negotiations with the mining industry are on the basis that 40% is it. However, the government will have given itself plenty of room to manouvre, just as it did with the Health Package, and will get its way in the long run, just as it did with the Health Package.

    • Ben81 says:

      12:48pm | 23/05/10

      Wow persephone, the mining companies suggested that the government impose this tax on their profits because they were making too much money did they?  Now i’ve heard it all.  That is what you’re implying isn’t it?

      I guess it is an ‘elegant’ way to dig us out of a hole, slapping a tax on mining profits and convincing the faithful that any opposition to it or concerns must be some kind of baseless fear campaign by the big bad fat cats.  I’m sure you truly believe that too, by the way.  I’d describe it as ‘sneaky’.

    • mtdd says:

      03:03pm | 23/05/10

      From Persephone: “the mining companies had suggested the idea themselves to Henry “. Misleading. The mining industry did not propose to Henry what the govt is now trying to foist upon them. Indeed Henry did not even propose what the govt proposes. From Persephone: “As for health reform - exactly what is there to mention? It’s been approved by the States”. Misleading. Not all the States have approved it - unless of course you are writing off WA? From Persephone: “the government will have given itself plenty of room to manouvre, just as it did with the Health Package, and will get its way in the long run, just as it did with the Health Package”. Misleading. Read what the govt wanted and then look at what it got - besides it hasn’t even got a national agreement (which is what it wanted - unless of course you are writing of WA).

    • persephone says:

      07:22pm | 23/05/10

      Ben

      yes; there’s numerous admissions on the record, from the likes of Clive Palmer, that they’re not paying enough tax.

      They were also dissatisfied with the mish-mash of taxes imposed at the moment and wanted something simpler and clearer - but you can read their submission to the Henry report yourself.

      It is the package which has been described as ‘elegant’, because it addresses not only problems with the mining industry per se - risk, lack of infrastructure, lack of incentive to ‘exhaust’ mines - but those that the two speed economy causes as well.

      It has little or anything to do with budget problems, as the programs the tax proceeds are being used for are all new initiatives - savings incentives, a drop in company tax, government input into superannuation. As these programs don’t exist at present, if the tax doesn’t go ahead, then they don’t either.

      So it’s nothing to do with digging the budget out of holes.

      mtdd

      No, this proposal is more sophistocated and better thought through than either of those suggested.

      Well, that makes WA irrelevant when we’re talking about what’s happening with the health package. We’re not hearing about it because it’s in the planning for implementation stage. Even if WA was involved, we wouldn’t be hearing about it.

      And I’m pretty sure that Rudd didn’t trade away anything he hadn’t already decided he was prepared to trade away. The concessions to the states were not only minor but fairly predictable.

      WA wrote itself off, when it comes to health. That’s their loss.

    • Ben81 says:

      11:53am | 24/05/10

      I wish I had your endless optimism persephone.  If you think the Mineral Council of Australia has anything like what it wanted from its submissions then perhaps you should go to their website and check out their responses to what’s actually happened.  They’ve even gone to the point of advertising against it in the media, anyone saying they got what they wanted is just looking for an easy way to brush them off. 

      It’s just yet another tax, this one being used to play Robin Hood with other industries, fund the new personal tax return arrangements, and help pay off debt.  Nothing to get excited about and quote people talking of its elegance as if it’s some kind of genius solution to everything.

    • Cameron Price-Austin says:

      01:10pm | 24/05/10

      @persephone

      We’ve covered this. They were campaigning for a single commonwealth taxation scheme to replace existing inconsistent state royalties. Their proposal would have been prospective, not retrospective.

      It’s not the same thing.

    • persephone says:

      01:19pm | 24/05/10

      Ben

      the Mining council has to defend its members and get the best deal it can for them. Of course it’s against the tax - in an ideal world, they’d like to pay no tax at all.

      This is all just posturing and doesn’t change anything.

      Cameron

      and, given that it’s not in the power of the Feds to remove state royalties, this is the best compromise and has exactly the same effect.

      There is nothing retrospective about the tax - it won’t tax profits made in the past but only those made after its introduction.

    • Ben81 says:

      10:52pm | 24/05/10

      Yes persephone, in their idea of an ideal fantasy world they wouldn’t pay tax but in the real world they would like to point out that they already pay a metric shitload.

    • acker says:

      09:55am | 22/05/10

      I reckon Julia Gillard and Malcolm Turnbull would think it’s been a pretty good week for their personal leadership aspirations. Young turks Greg Hunt and Tony Bourke have probably bumped themselves up the pecking order as well

    • Joan says:

      10:11am | 22/05/10

      The only budget that counts 2010-2011 is the governments and already global events and Rudds 40% Tax have fizzled Swans budget .Ken Henry -Australias Greenspan ( the guy who wept as he admitted he got things wrong after USA economy went down gurgler) - our Henry said events in Greece would have no effect on Australia, yet days later the market crashes.Ken Henry the same guy who knows that mining will grow with a 40% Super Profit Tax.

    • mtdd says:

      03:05pm | 23/05/10

      Yes. During Swan’s Budget speech the focus was on 2011 to 2012 - very little about 2010-2011. No surprise there given the big deficit forecast. All spin no substance. In fact a lie really.

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:54am | 24/05/10

      I dont mind governments planning long future in fact it should be encouraged. But surely given the recent history of treasury forecasting and he fact that an election is looming the budget focus should be on next years budget yet all I get to hear is 5 second sound bites of a proposed surplus in 2012-2013. I shouldn’t have to do my research it should be readily provided by an accountable and transparent government and a robust and aggressive media.

    • Darryl Price says:

      10:42am | 22/05/10

      Kevin Rudd is rusted onto the politics of envy. Only because he believes it is playing well to the masses - with whom he shares no real connection. This union perpetuated “us and them” bullshit marginalises the aspirational blue collar workers who ARE part of the engine room driving this economy and the continual improvements in standards of living for ALL Australians. Remember the union movement has money, not members - 15% of the workforce at my last recollection (Persephone, consort of Hades, feel free to correct me with a link). Members of my family and I are blue collar workers in the coal mining industry and pay a proportionate amount of tax. Yet everything that comes out of this government is about taking more money out of my family’ pocket; or directing allowances and benefits engineered to exclude my family. We spend money in the town, live in a regional area (gladly), and generally save and invest. Plenty of people like us who only finished high school are on good money, and similarly aspire to a comfortable life. Kevin Rudd belongs back in the ‘60s & ‘70s - they would have been his heyday. The man, his politics, and all those of his ilk have nothing to offer aspirational Australians.

    • Sherekahn says:

      11:00am | 22/05/10

      Keeping up with Kevin Rudd’s wonderful and clever back-flips.  Here are some pointers.

      Many people are showing typical crowd behaviour about Kevin Rudd’s mining tax and other issues.  Charles Dickens has a great description of crowd mentality in his book, “Tale of two cities.” (Chapter 11?)  It stands true today.
      Before the Financial crash and before the Indian student problems, Kevin saw the prospect of a “great leap forward.”  As with a previous event, that coined the phrase in China, his fell flat.
        Thinking of Hawke’s welcoming of the Chinese students here after the;
      Tiananmen Square massacre, (Rudd was just a kid then), and the hindsight success they have brought to Australia, Mr Rudd thought it could work with Indian students.  The floodgates were opened for them to gain visas in the hope that India’s burgeoning growth would prove them useful business ambassadors.  They may also have the skills for the future needs of the mining industry.  Perhaps as hairdressers or cooks in the mining camps.  They would also be bringing extended family, which if England’s figures are to be trusted, can be as many as 20 to 50 more migrants per Indian visa. 
      When the public got a glimpse of a possible population growth to 36 million to fulfil Kevin’s dream, there were rustlings heard around the country.  ASPP was in the news. (Kerry O’Brien’s 7;30 Report February 2010.).  People were quick to see the possibilities of a new hopeful and responsible Political Party forming to save Australia from the attempts by overpopulated countries to swarm to Australia.
      Here are the new and experienced workers for the Gorgon project thus diminishing the need for thousand of migrants!  Thus keeping Australia’s population steady and Kevin Rudd’s popularity up with those who have a mind for the welfare of Australia. 
      GO, GO, GO, Kevin from heaven; You have solved the chinese puzzle!


      Kevin’s popularity plummeted.  He started at last to hear the people!  His ETS delay was ridiculed by the dreamers.  Australia anyway was never going to drive the world policy on global warming.  With a population of 22 million, how could we tell people with populations of 100’s of millions how to do it?
      CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME.
      Our carbon footprint is said to be very high with 22 million; surely, it can only get worse with 36 million!
      Therefore, stabilise our population to help the world and create a viable alternative to the ETS.
        Genius, wonderful however, what about the Gorgon project?
      From Chevron Australia’s, web site:
      “Gorgon will be an important pillar of the Australian economy for more than 40 years.  Economic benefits: from the first 30 years of the initial project scope, according to ACIL Tasman will include a projected AU$64 billion boost to Australia’s Gross Domestic Product and direct and indirect employment of around 10,000 people at peak construction. Australian businesses also will benefit”

      Where will the workers come from?
      Easy! Slap a tax increase on Mining for Mineral Ores!  FMG threatens to delay future upgrades to its IRON ORE projects, theoretically ditching 10 to 20,000 workers.
      Here are the new and experienced workers for the Gorgon project thus diminishing the need for thousand of migrants!  Thus keeping Australia’s population steady and Kevin Rudd’s popularity up with those who have a mind for the welfare of Australia. 
      GO, GO, GO, Kevin from heaven; You have solved the chinese puzzle!

    • Against the Man says:

      11:08am | 22/05/10

      Rudd’s image as the in control, micromanager has been smashed! We see him for what he truly is => a bad tempered, incompetent pm who will hang out his ministers (roxon, garrett, wong etc) to dry and take the bullet for HIS failed policies or mistakes. Achievements = 0   Time for change!

    • biff says:

      11:33am | 22/05/10

      Both leaders may be feeling a little stressed after a week of bloopers. What about a nice taxpayer funded trip for both leaders to Paris, Rome, London, Vienna and New York to ease those frazzled nerves. I’m sure that some weak excuse can be found to justify the trip. What about using the old fact-finding-mission excuse to justify the trip? Yeah, that will satisfy the great unwashed. Off you go boys; have a good time.

    • Damili says:

      11:38am | 22/05/10

      What a shambles Australian politics has become. It is quite discouraging.  On one hand, we are at the mercy of a government who thinks up policies that are so laughable (and expensive) one is tempted to believe they are deliberately trying to pull the rug from under us.  Our next best hope, the Opposition, has been kicking the most improbable home goals that would test the skills of the most practised contortionist.  Is it too much to wish for a leader who is endowed with practical common sense and an ability to see the broader picture; is strong, and has the courage of his/her convictions tempered by an understanding of his/her limitations and a willingness to consult and heed the advice of wiser heads on difficult issues, both without and within the political sphere; someone who can communicate simply and intelligibly; who has worked in the real world;  who is prepared to do their best to put our country first, rather than the next election?  Does such a person exist in the political sphere in Australia? If they do, please tell me who that may be.

    • Mathew J says:

      12:14pm | 22/05/10

      I feel the trouble with both sides is they are out of touch with real Australia, its a case of stop giving us the BS and get on with the facts. Most of the stuff they say is gobblygook, I saw Abbotts plan for older workers today, early super ect. Well listen mate it ain’t gunna work and I am sure you will change your mind anyway so we just haven’t got any confidence in you. What is to stop people taking their super early, spending it, then going on the pension? Or spending it then going back to work to retire later on the pension? You need to think a bit more carefully, you asume we can’t add up. And what an amazingly silly and arrogant thing for Rudd to do but hit smokers BEFORE an election!! He’s kidding himself that we would all just say “ok anything for kevy babe” and still vote for him. Both sides need to get out in the real world where people actually work for a crust and talk to them

    • nosthow says:

      01:59pm | 22/05/10

      Another foolish brainsnap by a lightweight contender for the job of prime Minister of Australia. Now we know for sure we cant trust Abbott. Joe hockeys poor poor performance at the National Press Club and Barnaby Joyces recent idiotic statements should give Australia a little insight into what they are in for if they were to vote in an Abbott govt. Dills all.

    • Tom says:

      02:16pm | 22/05/10

      I am all for the RSPT - the reason?

      1) Share of Australian profits in mining has reduced from $1 in $3 in the early 90’s to $1 in $7 - read the treasury reports to see this for a fact. Why do I care about rich mining executives and their whining about losing potential profits ? The reality is that the equilibrium share of mining profits in our nation needs to be adequately and rationally taxed relative to previous benchmarked returns. Introducing this to more adequately allow a balance of income to the Australian people is a fantastic result in my mind. Take a look along the perth river - $10, $20, $30, $60 million dollar homes - do I care if these people loose a few million ? Not particularly.

      2) The argument that superannuation funds will falter is a flawed one. Superannuation funds should have adequate diversification plans otherwise they are not doing there job anyway. To contend that “billions will be lost in superannuation” funds is non-nonsensical considering the largest superannuation funds (and in fact all superannuation should) divest their funds across large industry segments and into multiple asset classes of investment.

      3) The reality that treasury modelling indicates that more mining will occur. China and Indias growth spectrum isn’t going sideways any time soon - the commodity pricing will continue to rise on our planet as resource scarcity increases. Natural resources are a natural boon for our Country for our country - and to argue that a minute few corporations - who already make, and who have already made, billions of dollars in profits and sit in their million dollar homes and yachts to complain is just a sad joke of the richest 0.01% of our society.

      4) Increasing the return on natural resources for Australians will result in a large portion of income for other areas of government.

      The question is not whether the RSPT tax should exist - in my opinion the tax is a well-structured and thought out plan. The real question that remains is whether the Rudd government will adequately, properly and seriously distribute those funds without waste. You only need to look at the education, insulation, environment and internet plans in place to realise what funds wastage is. I am neither labour nor liberal - rather a swing voter - but I agree in the RSPT. How the funds from it are distributed is more my concern. That is, the value in return from the collection of such funds.

    • Jason says:

      12:21am | 23/05/10

      I can’t believe how many journalists use the expression ‘gild the lily’ completely out of context. To gild the lily is to add unnecessary adornment to something already beautiful. Or to spoil something naturally beautiful. Why do so many people use it to describe something that has been made more attractive? The expression you twits are looking for is ‘sugar-coating’.

    • acotrel says:

      08:06am | 23/05/10

      Abbott must be conditioned by the successful telling of lies in the howard era?  What he doesn’t seem to realise is that when we vote, it’s on the basis of politicians promises.  And we reasonably expect a measure of TRUTH in their statements.  In any case it’s an offence to mislead parliament, and he should be aware of that, even if John Howard treated it with disdain!

    • Glorfindel says:

      08:46am | 23/05/10

      You don’t turn on the TV much then Chris? If you do how on earth have you missed the flood of health reform adds that are on ?

    • Rob says:

      02:48pm | 23/05/10

      How many of you had made a plans and commitments and then had to change them or drop them as the circumstances in your private lives has changed?
      The same go for Government you can plan and make a wishful thinking that things will go as they plan ,but this is life and as long as you try your best to do what you promise that is OK with me.
      Only fanatics and terrorists jump to their deaths.
      The thing I don’t like with politicians they don’t admit that things can’t be done as they thought ,or they will improve,change and do their best to achieve its promises.
      There is nothing wrong with changing one mind,as long as you admit the wrongs and try to do better next time.
      It is very different to lie , deceive and cheat to win or to take advantage.
      Lie is a Lie , to change your mind is not a lie.

    • Shelley says:

      02:22pm | 24/05/10

      A bloody good question.

      What happened to health?

    • persephone says:

      02:36pm | 24/05/10

      It got a heap of money allocated to it in the Budget.

    • Shelley says:

      06:25pm | 24/05/10

      WA didn’t sign so therefore no deal.

      And fancy. Not one hospital takeover.

      Big talk. No delivery.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter